"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, September 13, 2008

Joan Cusack explains how the world works, for the benefit of Sarah Palin
Posted by Jill | 5:56 PM
From Working Girl, 1988:




I can see birds out my window. Doesn't make me an ornithologist. Never will.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Hooray! An actual newspaper uses the "L" word
Posted by Jill | 10:49 AM
And in Florida, no less.

From the St. Petersburg Times in tomorrow's paper:
Campaign of lies disgraces McCain

McCain's straight talk has become a toxic mix of lies and double-speak. It is leaving a permanent stain on his reputation for integrity, and it is a short-term strategy that eventually will backfire with the very types of independent-thinking voters that were so attracted to him.

[snip]

McCain's faux chivalrous outrage over Obama's purported insult is beneath him. He has been a serious public servant willing to say unpopular truths when he thought it best for the country, but he's more than willing in this election to put his name on campaign lies. The leader who says he would rather lose an election than lose a war now risks losing his reputation in an attempt to win the White House.


Risks? McCain's reputation should be just about nonexistent by now, were it not for the barbecue ribs he used to bribe reporters into covering him favorably.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Because Osama Bin Laden has been of more use to George W. Bush alive than dead
Posted by Jill | 9:22 AM
Would the Bush Administration have been able to get away with systematically eviscerating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights if Osama Bin Laden had been captured before now? Hardly. So now we know: Just as with everything else this Administration has done, its handling of Bin Laden has never been about justice or about national security. It's been about politics all along. And now that George W. Bush needs SOMETHING....ANYTHING to try to mitigate his legacy as the most destructive, horrific president this country has known in its entire history -- NOW he's decided it's time to get Bin Laden:
NPR has learned that the raid by helicopter-borne U.S. Special Operations forces in Pakistan last week was not an isolated incident but part of a three-phase plan, approved by President Bush, to strike at Osama bin Laden and top al-Qaida leadership.

The plan calls for a much more aggressive military campaign, said one source, familiar with the presidential order, which gives the green light for the military to take part in the operations. The plan represents an 11th-hour effort to hammer al-Qaida until the Bush administration leaves office, two government officials told NPR.

"Definitely, the gloves have come off," said a source who has been briefed on the plan. "This was only Phase 1 of three phases."

Pentagon and White House officials have declined to discuss the new plan.

The intelligence community already had approval from the president to carry out operations inside Pakistan, which included attacks by Predator drones, which can carry 100-pound Hellfire missiles.

Additional authority came from the president just recently that allowed incursions by U.S. Special Operations forces, the source said.

[snip]

Both sources say those in the intelligence community and on Capitol Hill are raising questions about the political intent of this new aggressive stance.

"The question is," said one of the sources, "Why wasn't this done a year ago?"


For that matter, why not seven? Of course we know the answer. It's because a frightened population was a necessary condition for the Administration to eliminate our right to be left alone by our government and for it to stay in power for two terms.

Because for the Republicans, and this includes John McCain, it's never, ever "Country First." It's politics first. It's victory first. Country comes in at around #1,485.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Around the Blogroll and Elsewhere: Fighting Off Despair edition
Posted by Jill | 6:56 AM
Joshua Holland makes me wonder why, if Americans are so hungry for "deep and substantive change", John McCain is ahead of Barack Obama.

And Jed Lewison has video of Barack Obama in Concord, New Hampshire yesterday that will make you agree with our good friend jurassicpork that Republicans really ARE the stupidest voters on the face of the planet. (And before the e-mails come in howling about JP's equating Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton, let me say this: 1) The opinions of other posters on this blog are theirs alone and they are entitled to them; and 2) if you think that the Republicans weren't watching very carefully the hissyfits and relentless cries of sexism everywhere on the part of the Hillarions during the primaries, you're kidding yourself.)

The Great and Awesome Driftglass has the best blog post on the 9/11 anniversary EVAH, and makes us miss Steve Gilliard all over again.

Blue Girl points out that Sarah Palin is the Hugo Chavez of the tundra.

DCap says we've seen this movie before.

Jen Clark is too young to be this cynical already.

If you're not ready to put your head in the oven yet, Monkeyfister will just about provide you with the necessary push.

Heh-heh. PhysioProf said "stool".

And our OTHER favorite curmudgeon, Ornery Bastard, has some choice words for Joe Lieberman.

From the "That Didn't Take Long" file: Archcrone reports on gasoline price-gouging in Knoxville. Whatever happened to that notion that corporations would automatically serve the public good?

And on that note, have a nice day. Or a day. If you can.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Live Hurricane Ike Coverage
Posted by Jill | 6:10 AM
If you're interested in the on-the-ground situation in Houston, there's a live news video feed here. (h/t John Cole)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Gentlemen, why not call them what they are: LIES
Posted by Jill | 6:02 AM
Why can't the press use the "L" word? Is it because John McCain was a POW and therefore gets a pass on being a baldfaced, craven, pandering liar? Because if that's not the reason, if they're just being too "delicate" to say that perhaps the Senator from Arizona is "confused" or "muddy in the memory", they might have to say he's too senile to be president.

But in today's New York Times, two of the papers hacks di tutti hacks, Michael Cooper and Jim Rutenberg, write about the "outcry" over the McCain campaign's "distortions" -- as if defending yourself against outright lies and attacks were, to use Phil Gramm's favorite word, "whining", while holding Sarah Palin up like a human shield the way Martin Sheen's Greg Stillson character in The Dead Zone held up a baby and screaming "SEXISM!!" any time anyone criticizes her for any of her ignorance and hypocrisy:
Harsh advertisements and negative attacks are a staple of presidential campaigns, but Senator John McCain has drawn an avalanche of criticism this week from Democrats, independent groups and even some Republicans for regularly stretching the truth in attacking Senator Barack Obama’s record and positions.


No, you morons, it's not "stretching the truth." Stretching the truth means there's a kernel of truth in there somewhere. It's called lying. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "lie" as:

1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2: to create a false or misleading impression

So, Messrs. Cooper, and Rutenberg, why is this so difficult for you to understand? And why not use the word?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

America, as told by viral e-mails
Posted by Jill | 6:00 AM
This is the country you live in:
* If you grow up in Hawaii, raised by your grandparents, you're "exotic, different."

* Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American story.

* If your name is Barack you're a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.

* Name your kids Willow, Trig and Track, you're a maverick.

* Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.

* Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you're well grounded.

* If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate's Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran's Affairs committees, you don't have any real leadership experience.

* If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you're qualified to become the country's second highest ranking executive.

* If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you're not a real Christian.

* If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you're a Christian.

* If you teach teach children about sexual predators, you are irresponsible and eroding the fiber of society.

* If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state's school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant, you're very responsible.

* If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family's values don't represent America 's.

* If you're husband is nicknamed "First Dude", with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn't register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that hates America and advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, September 12, 2008

Putting Lipstick on a Pachyderm

By now, it ought to be obvious to all that Sarah Palin is nothing more or less than a political gold digger from the Klondike. It's like Anna Nicole Smith and her late 80-something year-old oil tycoon husband again, only of a much more massive magnitude. It ought to be obvious to all but isn't.

Instead, we're getting interviews conducted by ABC's Charles Gibson that seem to be following the lead not of formerly feral interviews of Mike Wallace but fluff pieces on Entertainment Tonight. Last night's edition of ET (followed up by Part Two tonight), whose very title should prohibit them from essaying political pieces, purported to show in 120 seconds "the real Sarah Palin."

Funny, but somehow they were unable to fit into their analog of the two minute hate her religious zealotry, attempts at book banning (including one written by a gay pastor), the petty firings, the cozy ties to lobbyists, a previous affection for pork barrel projects, her championing of disgraced lawmakers Ted Stevens and Don Young...

I guess there's only so much you can fit into 120 seconds so better to show nothing at all aside from the inside of her office. OK, you may say, it's only ET and ET phones home with nothing but celebrity glitz and other blathering. And you'd be right.

But the MSM, for the most part, is taking this laissez-faire, kid gloves approach to Palin while laughably trying to give the impression of bringing her half of the GOP ticket in-depth coverage.

Because to be critical of Palin is to be misogynistic, just as being critical to John "Incoming!" McCain is as subversively, seditiously unAmerican as an al Qaeda terrorist.

Yet, attacking a man for the color of his skin, his Muslim father, his Muslim middle name, his wearing African garb on a trip to Kenya, for being a community organizer aiding his fellow African Americans in Chicago's slums...

...well, all's fair in love, war and presidential campaigns. We'd be remiss in our responsibilities if we didn't faithfully pass on the conservatives' legitimate concerns about the Democrat.

If they can attack Michelle Obama, we can go after Palin's open-collared, gigolo-looking better half. We can go after her non-abstaining pregnant high school junior of a daughter. If they can attack Obama for what his former pastor said, then Palin's own Pentecostal church leader's comments, and her own, are fair game.

But Sarah Palin shouldn't be a sacred moose just because she has an X chromosome. Just because she wears a dress doesn't mean she's any less capable of the same evil that has characterized the present criminal enterprise in the White House, because the Devil has been seen wearing both red and blue dresses.



And it seems the more of Palin's ethical blackouts that come to light, the more arch and belligerent the McCain campaign gets, as if they're trying to hide with bluster their buyer's remorse for McCain settling on Palin like an elderly suitor who knows his time is running short without vetting her or meeting her more than once.

As far back as June of last year, when the Straight Talk Express was temporarily pushed to the wayside, wingnuts were setting up websites trying to draft Palin for Vice President (in conjunction, according the comments section, with anyone but McCain).

It's just putting lipstick not on a pig but a pachyderm. And the idiots who are sick and tired of retributory firings, pork barrel spending, politicians getting into bed with lobbyists while ignoring the concerns of voters and holy crusades in the Middle East look at Palin and think that she'll take them in a bold new direction. Which is proof positive that Republican voters have got to be the stupidest carbon-based life forms on the planet earth.
Bookmark and Share

It's not nice to fool Mother Nature
Posted by Jill | 9:32 PM


This awe-inspiring photo of Hurricane Ike is from Jeff Master's blog over at Weather Underground.

I wonder what Sarah Palin has to say about this storm and the impact of global warming, which has created the warm temperatures that seem to have turned the Gulf of Mexico into a virtual hurricane oven. I'm sure she'll say we have no impact on it whatsoever. But will she regard hurricane relief as "earmarks"?

I wonder what people like Pat Robertson and the like, who enjoyed saying that Katrina was God's revenge on New Orleans for having a gay pride parade, think about this storm hitting George W. Bush's home state.

I hope that those who for whatever reason had to stay behind and ride out the storm stay safe.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Well, at least we know now they were talking about at the RNC when they shouted "Drill, baby drill!"
Posted by Jill | 12:21 PM
Geez, Republicans....get a room already.





(h/t)

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

At the very least, this is about the double standard for rich, well-connected white women
Posted by Jill | 5:40 AM
I wonder...if Michelle Obama had been addicted to painkillers and had stolen drugs from a charity, and committed fraud to get them....would the DEA have largely looked the other way? Would she have been able to cop a plea as a "first-time offender", enter treatment, and perform community service instead of going to jail for twenty years?

I think not.

Not only that, but the McCain campaign would be yowling 100 years to Sunday about her addiction and degeneracy.

But Michelle Obama has NOT been addicted to painkillers. Michelle Obama is a woman who is the product of a strong marriage and family, rather than of a philanderer and his trophy wife. Michelle Obama is a woman who attended and graduated from Princeton and Harvard Law School. She's a woman of supreme confidence, grace, intelligence and wit, whose husband treats her like an equal and revels in her achievements.

But Cindy McCain is blonde, and extremely wealthy, and knows that her place is to stand silently by with a frozen smile gazing adoringly at her husband, who is a United States Senator who is running for president and feeds barbecued ribs to the press. So when a whistleblower comes out about just how Cindy McCain got out of serving twenty years for fraudulently obtaining drugs, and John McCain (or one of his surrogates) orders the Washington Post to scrub the story from its web site, the paper obliges. After all, it isn't as though they can get barbecued ribs anywhere else, so they'd better fall in line.

But a newspaper in Everett, Washington isn't under the purview of WaPo, but obviously has some kind of distribution agreement with the Paper of Barbecued Ribs, so the article appears at HeraldNet instead.

The Phoenix NewTimes wrote about the case in 1994:

You're U.S. Senator John McCain, and you've got a big problem.
Your wife, Cindy, was addicted to prescription painkillers. She stole pills from a medical-aid charity she heads and she used the names of unsuspecting employees to get prescriptions.

The public is about to find out about it.
Until now, you've managed to keep it all quiet. When Tom Gosinski, a man your wife fired, sued for wrongful termination and threatened to expose the whole sordid story, you didn't hesitate to call in the big guns.

John Dowd, the attorney who got you out of your Keating Five mess, worked on getting your wife a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors. He also made Gosinski's lawsuit go away.

He didn't stop there.
To help maintain your reputation and discredit your wife's accuser, Dowd called Maricopa County Attorney Richard Romley and complained that Gosinski was trying to extort money. Romley, your Republican ally, promptly launched an extortion investigation.

But now New Times makes a public records request for documents in the extortion case. It's only a matter of days before the story gets out.

Here's what the senator does.
He calls in another big gun, political strategist Jay Smith, who conceives a rather remarkable plan.

On August 19--just three days before the records are to be made public--Smith parades your wife before a select group of journalist friends. She tells a tale of pain and triumph, and, incredibly, all the reporters agree to sit on the story until August 22. When Cindy McCain says her confession is intended to quell rumors and to inspire other druggies to turn their lives around, the journalists lap it up. They write about her "bravery." The first round of stories is one-sided. There is no mention of Tom Gosinski or Romley's extortion investigation.


Ariel Levy touched only briefly on the matter in an article in the September 15 New Yorker, in which he writes about the discrepancies between the official stories about how John and Cindy McCain met and about Cindy's drug addiction and the Gosinski matter, but instead of calling the McCains' lies what they are, Levy refers to their version of these stories and the truth as "leaving out a detail or two."

John McCain sponsored a bill on drug testing for major league sports, and has fully supported the so-called War on Drugs, but when it's his own wife, it looks like he goes so far as to call off the DEA. Because like all other laws in the eyes of Republicans, drug laws are also only for those without the resources to strongarm federal investigators into backing off.

UPDATE: Looks like WaPo didn't take into account its comment section when it scrubbed this story. It's back up -- AND linked from the home page.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, September 11, 2008

OK, that's it. This woman is a wacko who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near Washington
Posted by Jill | 7:52 PM
Is anyone else reminded of Britney Spears in Fahrenheit 9/11 while watching this clip from Sarah Palin's interview by Charles Gibson?




This is what's scary:

GIBSON: Are you in favor of putting Georgia and Ukraine into NATO?

PALIN: (shrugs) Ukraine, definitely yes...and Georgia. Putin thinks otherwise, obviously he thinks otherwise, but --

GIBSON: But under the NATO treaty, wouldn't we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: (Nods) P..perhaps so. I mean, if that is the agreement, when you are a NATO ally is that when another country is attacked, you're going to be expected to be called upon and help.


She's clearly just throwing words around and making stuff up. Her peeps like tough talk, so she's talking tough. Yes, folks, Sarah Palin wants to prove how big her penis is by going to war with Russia. But hey, at least she's not black, right? Who cares if she's willing to provoke global thermonuclear war, at least she's not a ni---- with a funny name. And hey, she's a hockey mom and you can see Russia from Alaska. That makes her a Russian expert, right?

In Idiot America, yes.

(h/t)

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

And they'll spin this as "he was only trying to help his poor, drug-addicted wife"
Posted by Jill | 2:13 PM
I wish I could believe that this would have an impact on the campaign. But since Tom Brokaw has come out and said that John McCain gets a free pass on everything in his life because he was a prisoner of war, I guess he'll get a free pass on this one too.

I'd heard that there was something nasty about to come out about the McCains after the convention, and I guess this is it. Matt Stoller has the story:

A whistleblower is coming forth against John and Cindy McCain, and the picture he is painting is not a pretty one.  You've probably heard about Cindy McCain stealing prescription drugs from her charity in the 1990s.  Today, Tom Gosinski, her former employee and a close friend of the McCain's, came out on the record about the entire sordid episode.  And it appears that McCain used his Senate staff and resources to cover up Cindy's drug use, and potentially to prevent the Drug Enforcement Agency from investigating his wife's theft of illegal prescription drugs.  John McCain certainly used his political connections to begin a campaign of intimidation against Gosinski, because at the time - this was after the Keating 5 scandal - another major scandal would have derailed his career.  Gosinski stayed quiet out of fear until today; a recent fight with cancer has strengthened his resolve.  As he told me today, if he can beat cancer, he can go on the record regarding how the McCain's do business.



Now if this were Barack Obama, not even endless repetition of the 9/11 attacks would stand in the way of an endless media drum. But because, sort of like Jesus dying for our sins, John McCain suffered 40 years ago and therefore is not to be held responsible for any vile, crooked, greedy, ugly thing he does ever in his entire life (unlike other ex-POWs, who aren't granted the same free pass), I'm sure this will not make one bit of difference and the media won't touch it. There are lipstick on a pig stories to be told after all, and what's a presidential candidate using his Senate position to a) help his wife obtain prescription drugs to abuse, and b) squelch a DEA investigation into her drug use?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Thursday Big Blue Smurf Blogging: What They Said
Posted by Jill | 8:37 AM
Today's honoree: Craig Ferguson:




OK, yeah, I'm a sucker for Scottish accents. Ferguson could stand there and read the Book of Leviticus and I'd be here laughing. But when stand-up comics are the electoral conscience of the nation while the so-called "experts" are behaving like Mary Hart and Pat O'Brien, we have a serious problem.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

And so the annual orgy of grief takes place once again
Posted by Jill | 7:21 AM
It almost seems as if we enjoy this, this annual celebration of grief and horror and fear and terror. We know that Republicans enjoy it; they made a lovely pornographic snuff film about it to show at their convention, one which tacked on the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis at the beginning, just to lay the groundwork for the attack on Iran for which they lust. But what about the rest of us?

It is now seven years on, and all over the country, people and politicians are going to glom onto the memories of the 9/11 attacks, reliving the images and watching the television specials. Next thing you know, and it's already been rumbled in some quarters, someone will want to declare it a national holiday and you'll have all Dockers 40% off at Kohl's in "celebration" of 9/11 Day.

I was fortunate. I didn't lose anyone that day. Mr. Brilliant came into LaGuardia that morning on a flight from North Carolina on one of the last flights allowed into the New York area before the planes hit the towers. He'd been held up the night before due to a severe thunderstorm. I didn't lose any relatives, friends, or even people I used to know. A neighbor wasn't so lucky. She lost her husband. She has since moved, and her daughter lives in the house now with HER husband. I don't know them well, but every year I wonder how they feel about these memorials. There is another family in the area that I do know about because a friend knows them. They have spent the last seven years wearing flag pins and supporting George W. Bush (which I suspect they would have done anyway) and trying to comfort themselves with the notion that their son died a hero because he was sitting at his desk working while an airplane flew into his office building and the President they support sat in a third-grade classroom doing nothing.

I can't imagine what it must be like to watch your husband, son, father, brother, wife, mother, daughter, or friend die on national television in a spectacle that is replayed over and over and over again. I can't imagine what it's like to have the event in which your loss took place used to justify some of the worst atrocities ever committed by this country's leadership. I can't imagine what it's like to flip through your cable provider's program guide during this week every year and see one program after another on "how the towers fell", or movies in which actors who get to go home to their families portray people who died. Real people. YOUR people.

I know that there has been much controversy at the idea of terminating the practice of reading the names at Ground Zero every year. I can't imagine what it would be like to place importance on burial of one's remains and have to live every day knowing that YOUR loved one's remains are out in the unfortunately-named Fresh Kills landfill. It's no wonder that these families work so hard to keep the memory alive, to make sure that people know the faces and stories of these people who had children and families and hobbies and gardens and who loved the Yankees or Mets and puttering in the workshop on Saturdays and making Christmas cookies. It's no wonder the wounds are still so raw. Our government and our culture demands that they remain raw forever. It's in their interest that those wounds remain raw, in order to justify endless war and blockbuster movies.

I wonder if some of them resent this annual orgy of grief, held at their expense, by people in many places where the likelihood of being struck by lightning or wiped out hitting a deer on the road or dying from a gunshot in a bar fight or being killed in a tornado is greater than the likelihood of terrorists coming to their towns. I wonder if the idea of these observances is a comfort to the bereaved, or if it comes across by this late date as an attempt to be a part of something that can only be truly understood by those who have had to live with the immediate consequences every single day for the last seven years.

I have a friend who lost a daughter a couple of years ago. I remember someone we worked with saying that you never get over a loss like this, but you find a place for it. I always envisioned that place being like a room in your mind, where you go to visit the lost person every now and then. You know that person can't accompany you out of that room and that you have to live without that person except when you go into that room. Some people make that room literal when they leave the person's bedroom or office or workshop just as that person left it. You find a place. You find a place because the person is part of your heart and your soul and to not have that place is to cut a chunk out of your own being.

None of us expects to lose someone quickly and senselessly, and yet it happens every day. Car accidents. Stray bullets. A mugging gone bad. But when it happens so spectacularly, on national television, with many souls leaving us at the same time, and when the event is used as a political football for seven straight years, how do you find a place for it? How do you find a place when at every opportunity, politicians insist on not only going into that room with you, but on dragging your loved one out of it into the real world to use in a photo-op?

I realize that grief is an individual and private thing. But I wonder if the relentless invocation by Republicans of the 9/11 attacks, the trademarking of the event (as Keith Olbermann put it last night), is doing these families a disservice by insisting that their grief be kept raw in perpeutity for the political gain of Republicans. And I wonder if Americans' insistence that this is an event that affected all of us somehow cavalierly dismisses the very real hole in the lives of those families who actually WERE affected.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

MAAA! HE'S SAYIN' MEAN THINGS! MAKE 'IM STOP!!
Posted by Jill | 7:05 AM
What a bunch of crybabies:




Look, folks, I know hypersensitivity. I live hypersensitivity. If someone's in a bad mood, it's something I did. If someone hasn't e-mailed me for a while, it's because they're angry at something I did. Every day I have to sort out reality from my personal baggage. As I get older I get better at it, but believe me, I understand what it's like to be hypersensitive.

But then, I'm not running for president.

If John McCain and Sarah Palin are so hypersensitive to even imagined insults that they and their surrogates can make something out of this, then how can we expect them to stand up to terrorists and Vladimir Putin? How can we expect them to keep this country safe in a dangerous world, when they can't even handle insults that never even happened?

If you needed further proof that John McCain and Sarah Palin are just too emotionally fragile to be trusted with the Executive Branch, then you've just seen it in the above video.

(By the way, this is a great idea. "Fish for Obama." Love it.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Meanwhile, lost amidst the pearl-clutching of the McCain campaign...
Posted by Jill | 6:09 AM
While the McCain campaign is having the vapors over an expression that McCain himself has used in the not-so-distant past, Barack Obama is trying to do something about the atrocity that is the golden parachutes being offered to the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as rewards for running their companies into the ground and passing their mismanagement on to future generations via a government bailout:
Senator Barack Obama and two other prominent Democrats urged federal housing regulators on Tuesday to cut the golden parachutes of the ousted leaders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, another sign that the government bailout of those mortgage giants could reverberate through the presidential campaign.

Mr. Obama, the Democratic presidential nominee, asked that any “inappropriate windfall payments” to the chief executives and senior managers of those agencies be voided, in a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the new regulator for Fannie and Freddie.

Together, Daniel H. Mudd of Fannie Mae and Richard F. Syron of Freddie Mac are eligible for as much as $24 million in severance, retirement benefits and deferred compensation.

“Under no circumstances should the executives of these institutions earn a windfall at a time when the U.S. Treasury has taken unprecedented steps to rescue these companies with taxpayer resources,” Mr. Obama wrote.


Funny how it's only Democrats in Congress (including Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Chuck Schumer of New York) writing these letters. Perhaps Congressional Republicans approve of these pay packages. Their standard bearer, Sarah Palin John McCain, has given lip service to the rescue not turning into a bailout for executives and investors while on the campaign trail, but is obviously unable to do his job for Americans at the same time.

Meanwhile, another big brokerage house is trying to keep afloat by throwing ballast overboard and a major bank is about to founder as well:
Amid mounting worries about its viability, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. said it would unload a chunk of troubled assets, sell a majority stake in its money-management unit and slash its dividend 93 percent.

Its problems shook the rest of the financial sector.

The 158-year-old investment bank announced the moves as it reported a $3.9-billion fiscal third-quarter loss - far bigger than its $2.8 billion second-quarter hit.

The loss came after the Wall Street firm wrote down the assets on its books by $7.8 billion. That included a $5.3 billion reduction on investments tied to residential mortgages. The company, which has operations in Utah and 24,000 employees worldwide, also said it would shift up to $30 billion in commercial real estate assets to a new entity, which will be spun off to shareholders.

To conserve cash, Lehman is chopping its annual dividend to 5 cents a share from 68 cents.

''This is an extraordinary time for our industry and one of the toughest periods in the firm's history,'' CEO Richard Fuld said in a statement.

Fuld, 62, the longest-serving CEO on Wall Street, said the firm would examine all other options - including a total sale of the company he joined right out of college. Finding a buyer might pre-empt any hostile takeovers now that Lehman's stock has plunged from $67.73 a year ago to $7.25 Wednesday, down 54 cents.

The contagion spread to other financial companies. Washington Mutual Inc. plunged 74 cents, or 22.4 percent, to $2.56 after setting a multiyear low of $2.30 earlier. WaMu, among the banks hit hardest by the housing mess, has seen the value of its shares plunge 76 percent this year, as it battles rising mortgage delinquencies and defaults. The drop also signaled that the company's recent CEO shake-up may not have been enough to placate anxious investors.

Shares of Citigroup, JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp. and Wachovia Corp. also fell.

And the dominoes are beginning to fall. Great Depression, anyone? It's coming.

Of course, there is no situation Republicans cannot use for political gain. Keith Olbermann had a special comment last night on their appropriation of the 9/11 attacks into a brand:



...and now a county Republican chairman in Michigan is about to use the foreclosure crisis to throw a bunch of voters off the voter rolls for the November election.

It's no wonder the McCain campaign is resorting to "MAAAA! He called me names!!" If they can get voters to regard Barack Obama as a Mean Tough Black Man Who'll Stick a Knife In Your Gut As Soon as Look At You, they won't bother to look at their own checkbooks.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, September 10, 2008

If she's tough enough to be president, why treat her like a fragile flower?
Posted by Jill | 4:36 PM
Ah, the big strong military hero protecting the flower of white wimminhood against the Evil Black Man:




Wait a minute...haven't the Republicans used this kind of wolf imagery and footage before, in a different context?




I didn't even have to read the whole post at TPM, where the new ad was posted, to remember the wolf imagery used to represent Islamic terrorists in 2004. Nice dogwhistling, Mr. Rove. You get to evoke the earlier ad and reinforce the notion of Barack Obama as a Muslim Terrorist AND a Big Black Buck out to Debase Our White Women.

If the McCain campaign wants to use wolf imagery, why not just cut to the chase and run this as an ad:



I'm not sure how you fight this kind of thing, these lies and innuendo that play to people's most base fears; the things that keep them up at night, the notions they don't dare talk about. It's long past time for Obama to take the gloves off, but with the McCain campaign tapping the reptilian brain like this, I'm not sure what would work.

It's pretty much all up to the press at this point, and since the press has latched onto the "lipstick on a pig" thing and taken the McCain line that it's a slur against Palin, I guess we're pretty much screwed seven ways to Sunday.

Enjoy your new Christian Dominionist overlords, and enjoy yourself when they get the Battle of Armageddon they so desperately want.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

More like this please.
Posted by Jill | 2:10 PM




This is a start. But you're going to have to crank it up even more, Senator. Call them "liars." Yes, liars. Say that John McCain can no longer claim the "honor" mantle based on his military service. Point out that McCain has squandered that on lies and trivia. And point out that the Governor of Alaska is a plain old bald-faced liar. None of that it untrue. So start calling these sleazebags what they are.

I do question, however, your assumption that the American people deserve an election based on issues, since they seem to, as they always do, be responding so forcefully to lies and fabrications.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The Lion in Winter
Posted by Jill | 8:24 AM



No, I'm not talking about John McCain, I'm talking about Carlos Delgado. After all, if Rachel Maddow has to be talked off the ledge, it's time to turn to the spiritual life, which as anyone who's seen Bull Durham knows, is baseball.

I've long had a soft spot for Carlos Delgado, largely because of his political courage and his history of humanitarian work and activism for peace. It was no small thing in 2004 when, as a member of the Toronto Blue Jays, he stayed in the dugout during the playing of God Bless America during the seventh inning stretch in a July game against the Yankees. You could criticize it as an empty, unnecessarily inflammatory gesture -- the kind of gesture that Democratic politicians don't dare to make, lest Chris Matthews and Charlie Gibson say mean things. But Delgado simply stated what has now become a fairly mainstream view:

"It's a very terrible thing that happened on September 11. It's (also) a terrible thing that happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. I just feel so sad for the families that lost relatives and loved ones in the war. But I think it's the stupidest war ever. Who are you fighting against? You're just getting ambushed now. We have more people dead now, after the war, than during the war. You've been looking for weapons of mass destruction. Where are they at? You've been looking for over a year. Can't find them. I don't support that. I don't support what they do. I think it's just stupid."


Today, outside of those who think they're going to get a chance to nail Sarah Palin and have decided to support the Endless War agenda of John McCain, this is hardly a controversial view at this point. We now know that nothing has been done in terms of actual national security, but a great deal has done to make the world less stable. And this baseball player knew it in 2004.

Delgado doesn't just talk the talk, though, he also walks the walk. He took an active role in the protests against the use of Vieques, P.R. for U.S. bombing target practice in 2003. He brings toys to hospitalized children in his Puerto Rico hometown on Three Kings Day every year. He provided videoconferencing equipment to his hometown's hospital so it could communicate with doctors in Boston. He's been awarded, in 2006, the Roberto Clemente Award for exemplifying humanitarianism and sportsmanship. And oh, yes -- having made his point, he now stands for the singing of "God Bless America."

Here's Delgado teaching a class on "Mental Preparation for Athletes" in Santurce, Puerto Rico on November 8, 2007:




And did I mention that he's also gorgeous?

Earlier this season, it was easy to hate Carlos Delgado. As his batting average hovered around the .200 mark, and the lackluster Mets under the laconic Willie Randolph looked to be sinking slowly and painfully in the National League East, it was easy to figure that Delgado was done; that at age 36, with the injuries and the slow bat speed and the attitude, it was time to cut ties with Delgado as quickly as possible and look towards the future.

That was then.

This is now.

Under interim manager Jerry Manuel (who has, in my opinion, done the kind of work with this team that warrants at least a 2-year contract to stay on), Delgado has looked like the Delgado of old. He's raised his average to an incredibly productive .266, with 35 home runs and 103 runs batted in -- extraordinary statistics when you take into account his dismal first-half production. Whenever you see the Mets dig in their heels and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat -- something they just did not do in the first few months of the season, Delgado is right there. Last night, with Ollie Perez looking like the Pittsburgh Ollie Perez instead of the New York Ollie Perez, Delgado smacked two home runs to help the Mets to a 10-8 win.

Now instead of the boos that met him earlier in the season, Delgado comes to the plate to chants of "MVP! MVP!" With Billy Wagner out for the season, and perhaps for his career, the role of "closer" may not be filled from the Mets' always-suspect bullpen, but from the aging first baseman with the social conscience.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

OK, sign me up.
Posted by Jill | 8:20 AM
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, September 09, 2008

Here's what the stakes are, and why John McCain simply cannot win this election if we care about the future
Posted by Jill | 10:45 PM
I'm under no illusions that Barack Obama is a progressive dream candidate. But I fear for the future of this world if the lunatic pair of John McCain and Sarah Palin is elected:




(h/t)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

So will the press end their love affair with John McCain now that his "soulmate" is off-limits?
Posted by Jill | 9:19 PM
The media's shameless sucking up to John McCain has largely been due to the kind of backslapping familiarity he's allowed them over the years. Now he's putting Sarah Palin into the campaign equivalent of a high tower with a moat full of crocodiles around it -- off limits to anyone who might dare catch her in one of her many outright lies speak to her:

More than 40 million people tuned in last week to listen to the speech from Palin, the 44-year-old, first-term governor whom McCain announced as his surprise vice presidential pick just days before. Since then, that basic script is all anyone has heard from her publicly, and her only interaction with the media was a brief conversation with a small group of reporters on her plane Monday _ off the record at her handlers' insistence.

Associated Press reporters were not on the plane, but an aide told the journalists on board that all Palin flights would be off the record unless the media were told otherwise. At least one reporter objected. Two people on the flight said the Palins greeted the media and they chatted about who had been to Alaska, but little else was said.


Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O'Donnell were just discussing how the McCain camapaign gets away with having Palin lie over and over and over again, and O'Donnell talked about Palin's "popularity." It seems to me that Barack Obama was, until this shiny new object was dangled before the media, also "popular" and yet the media were all too willing to give credence to the notion that he was some kind of secret Islamic terrorist. So why the media should cower from calling Palin the liar that she is just because the wingnuts think she's some kind of small-government reformer when her record actually shows that she'll grab all the Federal cash she can; that she's some kind of "maverick" when she's actually a Dominionist theocrat; that she's just like your average soccer mom; and for the wingnut men, that somehow they'll have the opportunity to have sex with her, is a mystery.

It will be interesting to see whether the media respond to the placement of Palin as off-limits to them, the positioning of her as beyond questioning, the way they would if her name were, say, "Hillary Clinton."

Given who owns the media companies, I'm not putting my money on yes. For I am no fool.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

No, Senator McCain, it's YOUR campaign that's playing the race card
Posted by Jill | 5:39 PM
As one of our readers pointed out, "community organizer" is simply Karl Rove-speak for "n***er". And if you watched any of the speechifying at the Republican National Convention, the way speaker after speaker spat out the words "community organizer" as if it were spoiled meat, the implication was clear.

New York's increasingly awesome governor, David Patterson, called it this morning:
The McCain-Palin campaign is taking aim at Gov. David Paterson for his suggestion this morning that Republicans are making a "racist appeal" in their denegration of Barack Obama's days as a community organizer.

"I think that there are overtones of potential racial coding in the campaign," Paterson said during the Crain's Business Forum breakfast.

"...I think the Republican party is too smart to call Barack Obama 'black' in a sense that it would be a negative. But you can take something about his life - which I noticed they did at the Republican convention -- a 'community organizer.'

They kept saying it, they kept laughing, like what does this mean? It means that an individual who could have gone to Wall Street and made a lot of money and then run for office because he could buy media time chose to go back and work in programs in a neighborhood where he thought he could make a difference and became an elected official based on his involvement right in his own community."

McCain-Palin spokesman Peter Feldman fired back, calling Paterson's comments "disappointing" and accusing him of following Barack Obama's lead in "playing the race card" (an accusation initially levied at Obama by McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis).


I think it's hilarious that a campaign that is crying "sexism" every time someone dares ask Sarah Palin a question about the increasing number of lies she's telling about her views and her experience out on the campaign trail...





...a campaign that's demanding "deference" as if Palin were a queen instead of the "hockey mom" they also want her to be known as, is crying foul when a representative for Barack Obama calls them out on their obvious racism.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

With all due respect, Senator Obama....yes they are
Posted by Jill | 8:55 AM
This is some good stuff from Obama in Flint, Michigan yesterday:




I'm liking the "They must think you're stupid" meme. It creates a "you and I know what they're doing" community vibe and it provides a linkage between Obama and his audiences. And perhaps "They must think you're stupid" will work better than the third-person "The American people aren't that stupid", which was used by the Kerry campaign in 2004 to explain its refusal to fight the Swift Boat Liars for Horsepuckey. Except there's only one problem: Far too many of the American people ARE that stupid. They believe Obama is a secret Muslim at the same time that they decry his CHRISTIAN ex-pastor. They think John McCain is pro-choice. They think Sarah Palin is just some "hockey mom" from Alaska -- one of them -- instead of a dangerous ideological Christian Dominionist theocrat who's as corrupt as Dick Cheney no matter how "hot" some men think she is.

I'm not sure how you get around that. Maybe this "You and me, buddy" thing will do it, except whoever is making Obama's ads doesn't seem to use it.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The Daily Outrage: A Compendium of Sarah Palin Hypocrisy, Sleaze, and General Wingnuttia
Posted by Jill | 6:12 AM
Sarah Palin looks more like George W. Bush on steroids every day.

TPM: The Alaskan Independence Party, whose secession work Sarah Palin has cheered for years and of which Todd Palin has been a long-standing member, has ties not just to white supremacists, but also to the Chechen separatists who in turn have ties to Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden. I wonder what Jim Inhofe, who demands that Barack Obama prove that he loves his country thinks of this?

Washington Post: The alleged "reformer", Sarah Palin, "has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a "per diem" allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business."
The governor also has charged the state for travel expenses to take her children on official out-of-town missions. And her husband, Todd, has billed the state for expenses and a daily allowance for trips he makes on official business for his wife.

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official "duty station" is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post.

The governor's daughters and husband charged the state $43,490 to travel, and many of the trips were between their house in Wasilla and Juneau, the capital city 600 miles away, the documents show.


HuffPo: The McCain campaign's efforts to squelch the abuse of power investigation into Sarah Palin in regard to the firing of the state's public safety commissioner for refusing to fire her ex-brother-in-law have failed. For now.


AP: Sarah Palin's church preaches that you can "pray away the gay." Will Charlie Gibson ask if she believes that gays can be made straight through prayer? Don't bet on it.

Telegraph U.K.: John McCain plans to make Sarah Palin the public face of energy independence. So what does that mean? Does that mean that he doesn't have to show that he has any energy or stamina because Palin is like Bart Simpson on speed? Or is Palin the latest face of American energy policy being the private fiefdom for the enrichment of Administration members' family and friends, and in Palin's case, entire home state?

Andrew Halco (Alaskan blogger): In an eerie echo of Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin has requested a conference call with oil company CEOs to try to get a natural gas pipeline project that's gone nowhere jump-started. After all, she crowed about this pipeline during her speech last week; it kind of looks bad that the project has been languishing. This also gives Palin the framework she needs to put on a big show of being "tough on the oil companies.

Michael Kinsley: Separating the myth (or as they say in common parlance, LIES) told by the McCain camp and by Palin herself from the facts (or as they say in common parlance, TRUTH).

Juan Cole: Sarah Palin's values are not much different from those of the Islamic fundamentalists against whom John McCain claims are our "transcendent challenge.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, September 08, 2008

Wow...and all I got was 6 weeks notice and 6 weeks vacation pay for time I hadn't taken
Posted by Jill | 11:09 PM
But of course, I'm just a Web developer who left my former workplace with stellar references. I didn't mismanage an entire company, endangering the financial system of the entire country. If I'd done that, I'd never have to work again:

But even after the government seized the mortgage finance companies on Sunday and dismissed their chief executives, the companies’ outgoing leaders could see big paydays — a prospect that angers many investors, particularly because ordinary stockholders could be virtually wiped out.

Under the terms of his employment contract, Daniel H. Mudd, the departing head of Fannie Mae, stands to collect $9.3 million in severance pay, retirement benefits and deferred compensation, provided his dismissal is deemed to be “without cause,” according to an analysis by the consulting firm James F. Reda & Associates. Mr. Mudd has already taken home $12.4 million in cash compensation and stock option gains since becoming chief executive in 2004, according to an analysis by Equilar, an executive pay research firm.

Richard F. Syron, the departing chief executive of Freddie Mac, could receive an exit package of at least $14.1 million, largely because of a clause added to his employment contract in November of last year as his company’s troubles deepened. He has taken home $17.1 million in pay and stock option gains since becoming chief executive in 2003.


$9.3 million to get fired? Hell, I'll run a company into the ground for HALF that.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Rachel!!
Posted by Jill | 10:42 PM
It's clearly a show that's got to get itself together yet, but the debut tonight of "The Rachel Maddow Show" on MSNBC got off to a promising start, even if it did have a bit too much Keith Olbermann. We are huge Keith fans here at B@B, but the segment on the Obama interview felt a bit like "repurposing content", which is of course exactly what it was.

While I love the cheeky snark of calling a segment featuring Pat "Culture Wars" Buchanan "It's Pat" (with Buchanan seemingly unaware of the irony), I think the last thing Pat Buchanan needs is yet MORE air time on MSNBC. And Rachel doesn't seem quite able yet to keep him under control:



I'm not getting a funny, SNL-type Point/Counterpoint "Jane you ignorant slut" vibe out of this; both seem a bit too angry for this to do what it's clearly supposed to. But this is the oddest couple on television, and if it works better over time it'll be replayed right up there with the opening monologues on The Daily Show.

And of course the return of the great Kent Jones to Rachel's side caused much joy and huzzahs to emanate from Casa la Brilliant. Now if "Lawton Smalls" returns to the upcoming Seder v. Maron video show (watch this blog for updates and premiere dates), I can almost think the good old days are back.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Monday Big Blue Smurf Blogging: What They Said
Posted by Jill | 6:11 PM
Today's honorees: Christy Hardin Smith, who is in a better position than most of us to know why a woman's right to determine her own destiny is between her, her family, and her doctor AND NO ONE ELSE, least of all Sarah Palin and her false Army of God; and Marie Cocco, to whom Christy links.

Money quotes:

Smith:
Now you know why I feel so strongly about this issue. Because I've lived it and because my entire adult life has forced this issue to the forefront. Life is messy and people get caught up in situations that are not of their own making far too often. We never asked for an ectopic pregnancy, but we got one nonetheless. Pro-life folks want you to think that abortion is the only facet of being pro-choice but they could not be more wrong or dishonest.

Being pro-choice is to be compassionate and honest about the world around us, and to value the life of the mother just as much as the life within her -- and to trust the women and others involved in each circumstance to weigh all of the issues involved. Because that is what they already do. Most of the women that I have ever known who faced unenviable difficulties in these decisions chose to have their child where it was medically possible. Which is...a choice.

Pretending otherwise is simply to lie.


Cocco:
Anti-abortion activists promote a policy of official meddling — yes, by government bureaucrats — into the private lives of millions of American women, and the lives of their husbands and boyfriends.

Their pleas to now give the Palin family privacy in one of its most difficult moments are easily understood and no doubt supported by every American who has ever had a family crisis. That is, by all of us.

No one who supports abortion rights would wish for any unmarried, 17-year-old girl to become pregnant. No advocate of abortion rights would even suggest that a teenager in Bristol's situation should terminate the pregnancy without weighing her own conscience and deciding, with her family, on her own course.

And yes, we believe she should make her decisions in a private cocoon, embraced by loving family and friends. We just wish that anti-abortion crusaders would afford every family the same respect for privacy they now demand for one of their own.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

If you liked the secretiveness of George W. Bush, you'll LOVE Sarah Palin
Posted by Jill | 11:24 AM
Sarah Palin doesn't believe in open, accountable government either:
In June, Andrée McLeod, a self-described independent government watchdog in Alaska, sent an open records act request to the office of Governor Sarah Palin. She requested copies of all the emails that had been sent and received by Ivy Frye and Frank Bailey, two top aides to Palin, from February through April of this year. McLeod, a 53-year-old registered Republican who has held various jobs in state government, suspected that Frye and Bailey had engaged in political activity during official business hours in that period by participating in a Palin-backed effort to oust the state chairman of the Alaska Republican party, Randy Ruedrich. (Bailey has been in the national news of late for refusing to cooperate with investigators probing whether Palin fired Alaska's public safety commission because he did not dismiss a state trooper who had gone through an ugly divorce with Palin's sister.)

In response to her request, McLeod received four large boxes of emails. This batch of documents did not contain any proof that Frye and Bailey had worked on government time to boot out Ruedrich. But there was other information she found troubling. Several of the emails suggested to her that Palin's office had used its influence to reward a Fairbanks surveyor who was a Palin fundraiser with a state job. In early August, McLeod filed a complaint with the state attorney general against Palin, Bailey, and other Palin aides, claiming they had violated ethics and hiring laws. Palin, now the Republican vice-presidential candidate, told the Alaska Daily News that "there were no favors done for anybody."

But more intriguing than any email correspondence contained in the four boxes was what was not released: about 1100 emails. Palin's office provided McLeod with a 78-page list (PDF) cataloging the emails it was withholding. Many of them had been written by Palin or sent to her. Palin's office claimed most of the undisclosed emails were exempt from release because they were covered by the "executive" or "deliberative process" privileges that protect communications between Palin and her aides about policy matters. But the subject lines of some of the withheld emails suggest they were not related to policy matters. Several refer to one of Palin's political foes, others to a well-known Alaskan journalist. Moreover, some of the withhold emails were CC'ed to Todd Palin, the governor's husband. Todd Palin—a.k.a. the First Dude—holds no official state position (though he has been a close and influential adviser for Governor Palin). The fact that Palin and her aides shared these emails with a citizen outside the government undercuts the claim that they must be protected under executive privilege. McLeod asks, "What is Sarah Palin hiding?"


Hmmmm....vindictiveness towards political opponents, claiming executive privilege, believing oneself as God's anointed agent -- John McCain may not be George W. Bush, but Sarah Palin sure as hell is.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

If Jeremiah Wright is fair game, let's take a look inside Sarah Palin's church, shall we?
Posted by Jill | 7:09 AM
Palin's church is less a house of faith than it is a house of politics -- specifically Dominionist politics, as Bruce Wilson of Talk to Action reports:

Sarah Palin's churches are actively involved in a resurgent movement that was declared heretical by the Assemblies of God in 1949. This is the same 'Spiritual Warfare' movement that was featured in the award winning movie, "Jesus Camp," which showed young children being trained to do battle for the Lord. At least three of four of Palin's churches are involved with major organizations and leaders of this movement, which is referred to as The Third Wave of the Holy Spirit or the New Apostolic Reformation. The movement is training a young "Joel's Army" to take dominion over the United States and the world.

[snip]

The pastor, Ed Kalnins, and Masters Commission students have traveled to South Carolina to participate in a "prophetic conference" at Morningstar Ministries, one of the major ministries of the Third Wave movement. Becky Fischer was a pastor at Morningstar prior to being featured in the movie "Jesus Camp." The head of prophecy at Morningstar, Steve Thompson, is currently scheduled to do a prophecy seminar at the Wasilla Assembly of God. Other major leaders in the movement have also traveled to Wasilla to visit and speak at the church.

The Third Wave is a revival of the theology of the Latter Rain tent revivals of the 1950s and 1960s led by William Branham and others. It is based on the idea that in the end times there will be an outpouring of supernatural powers on a group of Christians that will take authority over the existing church and the world. The believing Christians of the world will be reorganized under the Fivefold Ministry and the church restructured under the authority of Prophets and Apostles and others anointed by God. The young generation will form "Joel's Army" to rise up and battle evil and retake the earth for God.


More here.

Somehow I don't think Charlie Gibson is going to ask Sarah Palin about her church the way Barack Obama was called to task for his, even though Sarah Palin's religion explicitly calls for taking back the earth for Christ -- and being a melanoma away from the Presidency puts her in a position to impose her lunatic religious views on the rest of the country.

But there is MSNBC, quaking in its boots before the Almighty McCain Campaign, lest people start questioning the extent to which Mrs. Palin is prepared to follow George W. Bush as the self-appointed architect of Armageddon.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

MSNBC capitulates to Karl Rove and the Republican Party
Posted by Jill | 6:49 AM
So now the Republicans get to pick and choose who gets to cover the presidential campaign and how it is covered:
MSNBC tried a bold experiment this year by putting two politically incendiary hosts, Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews, in the anchor chair to lead the cable news channel’s coverage of the election.

That experiment appears to be over.

After months of accusations of political bias and simmering animosity between MSNBC and its parent network NBC, the channel decided over the weekend that the NBC News correspondent and MSNBC host David Gregory would anchor news coverage of the coming debates and election night. Mr. Olbermann and Mr. Matthews will remain as analysts during the coverage.

The change — which comes in the home stretch of the long election cycle — is a direct result of tensions associated with the channel’s perceived shift to the political left.

“The most disappointing shift is to see the partisan attitude move from prime time into what’s supposed to be straight news programming,” said Davidson Goldin, formerly the editorial director of MSNBC and a co-founder of the reputation management firm DolceGoldin.

Executives at the channel’s parent company, NBC Universal, had high hopes for MSNBC’s coverage of the political conventions. Instead, the coverage frequently descended into on-air squabbles between the anchors, embarrassing some workers at NBC’s news division, and quite possibly alienating viewers. Although MSNBC nearly doubled its total audience compared with the 2004 conventions, its competitive position did not improve, as it remained in last place among the broadcast and cable news networks. In prime time, the channel averaged 2.2 million viewers during the Democratic convention and 1.7 million viewers during the Republican convention.

[snip]

The McCain campaign has filed letters of complaint to the news division about its coverage and openly tied MSNBC to it. Tension between the network and the campaign hit an apex the day Mr. McCain announced Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. MSNBC had reported Friday morning that Ms. Palin’s plane was enroute to the announcement and she was likely the pick. But McCain campaign officials warned the network off, with one official going so far as to say that all of the candidates on the short list were on their way — which MSNBC then reported.

“The fact that it was reported in real time was very embarrassing,” said a senior MSNBC official. “We were told, ‘No, it’s not Sarah Palin and you don’t know who it is.’ ”

Tom Brokaw and Brian Williams, the past and present anchors of “NBC Nightly News,” have told friends and colleagues that they are finding it tougher and tougher to defend the cable arm of the news division, even while they anchored daytime hours of convention coverage on MSNBC and contributed commentary each evening.

Mr. Williams did not respond to a request for comment and Mr. Brokaw declined to comment. At a panel discussion in Denver, Mr. Brokaw acknowledged that Mr. Olbermann and Mr. Matthews had “gone too far” at times, but emphasized they were “not the only voices” on MSNBC, according to The Washington Post.

Al Hunt, the executive Washington bureau chief of Bloomberg News, said that the entire news division was being singled out by Republicans because of the work of partisans like Mr. Olbermann. “To go and tar the whole news network and Brokaw and Mitchell is grossly unfair,” he said, referring to the NBC correspondent Andrea Mitchell.


"Incendiary"??? You're damn right. How can you NOT be incendiary when we see a 72-year-old man with a history of anger management issues, a complete lack of insight into foreigh policy OR economic affairs, whose ONLY claim to the presidency is a sense of entitlement that he was shot down over Vietnam 40 years ago and held captive -- as if he were the ONLY one with this experience, demanding a free pass from the media because he was a POW? How can you NOT be incendiary when an obvious theocrat who is lauded for spewing hate-filled bile at her party's convention is hailed as the Republican Party's newest rock star because she popped five kids and some American men think they'd like to nail her?

And all this is happening as Rachel Maddow prepares to debut her new show tonight. Who knows what kind of muzzle they're going to put on her?

And why IS everyone so frightened of the Republicans anyway? Is it because the election is already fixed and they don't want to get on the bad side of the New American Authoritarian Theocracy?

A free press is the hallmark of a free society. When the campaign of a presidential candidate can make a few phone calls and get an entire network to try to silence its public faces, then our relentless march towards a propaganda-driven dictatorship is all but complete.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, September 07, 2008

Sunday Night Blogger Blogging: Around the blogroll and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 9:42 PM
Some perennial favorites, and some that I neglect horribly:

Hoffmania: Even fancy coffee drinks are OK if you're a Republican.

Dave Neiwert: The FBI wanted to charge the meth-heads accused of plotting to kill Barack Obama during the Democratic National Convention, but a U.S. Attorney who is a Karl Rove operative said no.

Fact-esque: I'll bet this story won't get a lot of media attention: A former Halliburton executive has pleaded guilty to bribery in connection with a contract to build a liquefied natural gas pipeline in Nigeria. This occurred when Dick Cheney was CEO.

Oliver Willis: The contrast between the Democratic and Republican conventions reminded him why he's a Democrat. (Me too.)

Walter Brasch: What Sarah Palin's lust for killing says about her.

Pam: Michael Reagan, instead of seeing the Virgin Mary on a grape (I think it looks more like the woman on the Sun-Maid raisin box, sees his father in a dress.

Brad Friedman: subbing for Randi Rhodes tomorrow (Monday) on NovaM Radio from 3-6 PM Eastern time.

Sam Seder and Marc Maron: doing a VODcast tomorrow (Monday) from 3-4 PM. If you do not have a NovaM subscription, your head will explode trying to decide what to do.

James Wolcott: on Sarah Palin's speech.

Tata: ...is never one to shy away from a fashion statement, but as she so aptly and succinctly notes, this particular piece of headgear really IS vile.

Andy Ostroy: It isn't that Palin is a woman, it's that she's the WRONG woman. (But I have to wonder just how much the Hillarion Hissyfits had to do with creating this mess.)

And finally...

Blue Girl: McCain has a Napoleon Complex.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Today we call it "Oppositional Defiant Disorder"
Posted by Jill | 9:29 PM
John McCain's anger management problems didn't start when he came home from Vietnam; they've always been there:
At age 2, McCain's tantrums were so intense that he'd hold his breath for a few minutes and pass out. His parents would dunk him in cold water to "cure" him, he wrote in his memoir, "Faith of My Fathers."


Behaviors that are symptomatic of ODD:
Frequent temper tantrums
Argumentativeness with adults
Refusal to comply with adult requests or rules
Deliberate annoyance of other people
Blaming others for mistakes or misbehavior
Acting touchy and easily annoyed
Anger and resentment
Spiteful or vindictive behavior
Aggressiveness toward peers
Difficulty maintaining friendships
Academic problems


Just think about it: Our next president, unless the media gets off its collective knees and Barack Obama stops talking about how successful the surge was and what an honorable man John McCain is, may very well be a hothead with a religious nutball as his Vice President.

(h/t)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Tell me about it.
Posted by Jill | 9:20 PM
Heck of a job, Bushie. Is this your way of getting women out of the workplace and back to the kitchen where they belong? (All except Sarah Palin, of course, because it's OK to be a career woman if you're a Republican.)

The unemployment rate jumped to 6.1 percent in August, the highest level since September of 2003. The establishment survey showed the economy losing another 84,000 jobs in August. With downward revisions to data for the prior two months, the economy has lost an average of 81,000 jobs over the last three months.

Virtually all the data in the household survey indicates that the labor market is weakening at a rapid pace. The 6.1 percent unemployment rate is only 0.2 percentage points below the 6.3 percent peak reached in June of 2003. The employment to population ratio (EPOP) ratio fell to 62.1 percent, only slightly above the 62.0 percent low hit in September of 2003.

Unemployment rose among almost all demographic groups, but women were hit hardest, with a rise of 0.7 pp to 5.3 percent.

[snip]

The only sectors that continue to show healthy job gains are health care, which added another 26,900 jobs, and state and local governments, which added 18,000 jobs. Job growth in both of these sectors is likely to fade as state and local budget shortfalls force cutbacks.


Now that's funny, my job was in both state and (arguably) health care, and here I am. Ha ha ha.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

How John McCain and Sarah Palin will win the election
Posted by Jill | 9:08 PM
...in true Republican fashion, by mass disenfranchisement:

Ohio election officials are sending out a mass mailer stamped “do not forward” to all registered voters today (Sept. 5) with an absentee ballot application and other important notices for Nov. 4.


What’s important here is not so much what’s going out as what’s being returned to sender.


Unbeknownst to the would-be recipients, the same mailer — just 60 days before the election — has the potential to determine their eligibility to vote, challenged not by election officials but by partisan opposition.


A similar mailer in March netted nondeliverable mail from almost 600,000 registered voters in just five Ohio counties who could now have their ballots thrown out for voting under the wrong address.


The National Voter Registration Act prohibits any state from purging names from the voting rolls within 90 days of an election.


The law doesn’t, however, preclude mass partisan challenges on or shortly before Election Day — known as voter caging — based on the same returned envelopes from state-sponsored mailers like the ones in Ohio and others going out across the country.


In 2004, the year the national election hinged on results from Ohio, the Ohio Republican Party challenged 35,000 voters based on returned mail from the GOP's own friendly reminder notices. From 2004 to 2006, Republicans challenged 77,000 voters this way nationwide. A consent decree issued in 1982 and amended in 1987 enjoins the GOP from instituting “ballot security programs” that focus on minority voters.


No evidence so far suggests Republicans — vote caging is essentially a GOP sport — have mounted a caging campaign this year. Yet, in July, Franklin County Election Director and County GOP Chairman Doug Preisse told reporters he didn’t rule out challenges before November, particularly because of increased home foreclosures, which would make failures to change address on voter registration records more common.


A challenged voter will likely cast a provisional ballot, which often requires voters to return to election divisions to prove their identity and address. Nearly a third of all 1.6 million provisional ballots cast in 2004 were thrown out.




It all becomes clear now, doesn't it? It's almost enough to make you think that the easy credit "liar loans" and interest-only mortgages were specifically designed to result in massive foreclosures and the accompanying mass dislocation of lower-income (read: Democratic) voters all across the country. Send them non-forwardable mailings at the address from which they were foreclosed, and bingo! An invalid voter.

You've got to hand it to the Republicans -- they sure know how to cover all the bases. It will be interesting to see how these voters respond when they show up and aren't allowed to vote -- and how Americans will respond when they find out that in addition to being homeless, John McCain's health plan consists of yanking the rug out from under them and giving them a tax credit of only $2500 to $5000 with which to buy a $12,000/year family health insurance policy. But of course John McCain would think that $5000 is enough; after all, HE has the best health insurance in the country, and who else matters? And by the way, did you know that he was a POW?

MONDAY UPDATE: Kansas, Michigan, and Louisiana are also illegally purging their voter rolls.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

No surprise here
Posted by Jill | 7:06 PM
It should come as a surprise to no one that the biggest Republican brownnoser on all the major networks has landed the first interview with Sarah Palin:
Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin has agreed to sit down with ABC's Charles Gibson later this week for her first television interview since John McCain chose her as his running mate more than a week ago.

Palin will sit down for multiple interviews with Gibson in Alaska over two days, most likely Thursday and Friday, said McCain adviser Mark Salter.

The interview with Palin was confirmed Friday, ABC News spokesman Jeffrey Schneider said.


In case you've forgotten about Charles Gibson's disgraceful performance as a moderator of the Democratic primary season debate lasta April, Keith Olberman dissected it immediately after it took place:



Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

What the McCain/Palin theocracy will look like
Posted by Jill | 3:49 PM
Oh, that Sarah Palin is a piece of work. No wonder she makes the Republican base so happy, she sees nothing wrong with using state funds to travel to her to her old church in Wasilla to exhort the youth to "make sure God's will be done here":

State records show that Palin submitted a travel authorization for a quick round-trip visit to attend the June 8 graduation of the Master's Commission program at the Wasilla Assembly of God, the church where she was baptized at age 12. The only other item on the agenda for that trip was a "One Lord Sunday" service involving a network of Mat-Su Christian churches earlier that morning at the Wasilla sports complex.

The records show Palin flew from Juneau to Anchorage on Saturday, June 7. She returned to Juneau that Monday afternoon. The plane tickets cost the state $519.50, and she claimed an additional $120 for meals and other expenses.

Palin couldn't be reached for comment Friday as she campaigned for vice president. Her spokeswoman at the McCain campaign said she wouldn't grant an interview.


Of course not. Asking any questions of Sarah Palin is sexist, don'tcha know.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

This Is Why Joe Biden, Women's Sovereignty Over Their Own Bodies Edition
Posted by Jill | 2:19 PM
THIS is why I wanted Joe Biden for the #2 spot. Because no one in politics has ever explained the issue of abortion, religion, and the role of government, better than this:


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share