"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, June 30, 2007

Not even Olbermann had the stones to do this
Posted by Jill | 9:02 PM
But Mika Brzezinski did:





You go, girl.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

R.I.P. Joel Siegel
Posted by Jill | 5:34 PM
Is it my imagination, or is the day of the film critic over?

I did movie reviews online for seven years. For seven years, I spent just about every weekend day in a darkened movie theatre, then went home and wrote about them. Then one day in 2005, after plodding my way through a review of the Jet Li film Unleashed, it all just seemed just so trivial.

Back when I was in the Online Film Critics Society, and later on as a founding member of Cinemarati, working towards gaining credibility for online film reviewing seemed like a worthy goal, if not necessarily an attainable one. Film festivals proliferated and for a while it seemed that everyone was reviewing movies. Some of those writing were better than others, but it seemed like a worthy endeavor. Then one day I just didn't want to do it anymore. To some degree, blogging is having the same trajectory, so far with better results. But with Roger Ebert being out of the picture due to illness, and now with the death of Joel Siegel, it seems that the quote whores have won the day -- and reading movie reviews has less impact than ever on people's decision to see a movie -- witness the success of Evan Almighty.

Still, I can't help but feel that yet another door is closing on the art of film reviewing with Siegel's death. For one thing Siegel wasn't was a whore. Like Ebert, Siegel always seemed able to evaluate a movie not in terms of how it compared to some four-hour film about World War II filmed entirely with handheld cameras in the Czech Republic, but in terms of what it was trying to do -- and he managed to do it without Ebert's unfortunate tendency to filter Angelina Jolie movies through the filter of her two co-stars.

What I'll always remember about Joel Siegel is the way he convinced me that Titanic was a film I should see. I had been a Rivethead ever since reading A Night to Remember since the sixth grade, and when I'd heard that James Cameron was going to do this film with a painstaking re-creation of the ship, I was geeked -- until the reports of cost overruns and talk of "Waterworld II" begam seeping (so to speak) out.

But after seeing Siegel on Good Morning America the day it opened, I knew it was someting I wanted to see.

Yes, I know, melodrama, crappy dialogue, propeller guy, and all of that. And the film has aged badly. But the first time in, it was magic -- and Siegel saw that.

It's easy for cinéastes to mock guys like Siegel; the kind of people who worship at the altar of Jonathan Rosenbaum and think Anthony Lane is a hack -- as if reviewing actors pretending to live lives is some kind of Great Cosmic Endeavor. And perhaps this is why I never really was cut out to be a film critic. But I couldn't help but feel sad upon hearing about Siegel's death, because it's just another sign that the art and the industry of movies is changing radically -- and we just don't really know where it's going.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Around the blogroll and elsewhere -- weekend edition
Posted by Jill | 9:17 AM
Busy weekend after being away for a week, so blogging will be light. But there's much going on, so let's take the old keyboard out for a spin:

DUUUDE!! Cliff Schecter has the goods on Norm Coleman's stoner days. I can't wait to watch this guy:





...paint Al Franken as a hippie.

Brynn Craffey at the DOS attack-proof Shakesville temporary home thinks something is fishy about the London car bomb story (and I agree...)

Cernig on the Administration's contention that if Americans kill people in Iraq, they are therefore by definition al-Qaeda, not civilians.

Liberal Talk Radio on the state of news media.

Sean Daniel on how using the term "Animal House" to describe bad political behavior disses the denizens of Delta House.

Jon Swift on desegregation and original intent. (Warning: do not click unless you appreciate finely-honed snark.

At the Berlin Zoo, Knut's surrogate parent Thomas Dörflein begins to get his life back, not without some ambivalence at cutting the umbilical cord to his furry adopted progeny. Women worldwide weep, and parents everywhere relate.

He's still 0-for-8: John Amato on Bob Shrum's appearance on The Daily Show.

And speaking of The Daily Show, Hoffmania links us up to Lewis Black in perfect form as he explores the conservative Toobz.

Auguste explores the demented, and yes, misogynistic, world of Debbie Schlussel.

Jurassicpork is going on hiatus to finish his novel. Let me know how it goes, JP....I have one that needs finishing too, and at this rate, I don't have enough life expectancy ahead of me, despite ridiculously hardy genes, to finish it.

And finally, Badtux the Rude Penguin (is he related to the missing Jeffy?) gets his rant on about the health insurance industry.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Blogswarm this!
Posted by Jill | 8:55 AM
I realize that this little bloggeroo doesn't have the kind of high traffic to mount an effective blogswarm, but it's worth a try.

As someone who has watched a spouse go through a number of job searches, plowing through ads with long lists of requirements for completely unrelated skills that no one person can possibly have, it's been clear to me that job recruiting is done with the clear goal of NOT finding qualified American workers, so that H-1Bs can be hired instead.

Thanks to Carrie, who commented here for the first time yesterday and who is being blogrolled as a way of expressing our thanks, we now see that there are, in fact, immigration attorneys who are in the business of helping employers disqualify American workers to facilitate the hiring of foreign workers:





If you are not a tech worker and you think this doesn't affect you, guess again. It affects all of us.

And if you're thinking of supporting Hillary Clinton for president, call her campaign headquarters and refer them to this video and ask what the candidate's official response to this kind of practice is. If you're supporting Bill Richardson, ask how "education" addresses the problem of a policy that allows companies to rig the system to exclude American workers. Then please share with us in the comments what you find.

(More at Information Week and lots more videos of media coverage here. Note how all of the representatives interviewed in the media coverage are Republicans. Does this mean the Democrats support excluding Americans from the job force via these tactics? I think it's worth contacting our Democratic representatives and Senators, as well as our presidential candidates, and finding out.)

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 29, 2007

From now on I am a "thinness-free person"
Posted by Jill | 12:51 PM
Eavesdropping on American citizens without a warrant is now a sign of FREEDOM, get it?

This reeks of classic Rove.

The AP — and therefore official mainstream media — wording for Bush/Cheney’s warrantless wiring taping program is suddenly the new and improved “warrant-free program” or alternatively, “warrant-free eavesdropping.”

Think about it. Warrantless wiring taping sounds as if what you did was without a warrant, which would make it illegal. Warrant-free just means you were unfettered by warrants. That sounds so much nicer, doesn’t it? Like sugar-free is superior to sugarless, or law-free is better than illegal.

And eavesdropping is what Lucy did to Ethel when she was trying to find out what Ricky was getting for her birthday. Wiring tapping…well, that makes makes you think of Watergate.


This is now the official lapdog media meme for the new police state -- it's not warrant-less, it's warrant-FREE! And FREE!! is good, right? After all, to phrase it the other way might make us think of Watergate, right? Good heavens, if we do that, then Barack Obama might have to find his balls and stop reaching across the aisle to the Bush Administration and insisting that going to war based on lies, announcing via signing statements that you have no intention of obeying laws, and conducting mass surveillance of American citizens aren't crimes because golly gosh gee whillikers, it might make the president MAD, and we are just too genteel for that.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Did the Democrats have a debate last night?
Posted by Jill | 7:26 AM
Of course they did. Unfortunately, I missed most of it, but I did tune in just in time to hear the entire crew of them talk about education as the cure for outsourcing. I hate to tell this bunch of nimrods this, but there are hundreds of thousands of displaced tech workers, many of them over 40, who cannot find jobs due to outsourcing and age discrimination. You can talk about education all you like, but this bunch has only been listening to the corporate executives who stuff their campaign coffers complaining that there aren't enough skilled Americans to fill the available jobs and that's why they need to bring in more H-1Bs and outsource their programming to India. Try talking to the actual tech workers sometime; the people sitting at home learning Flash and C# and ASP.Net out of a book and who still won't be able to find jobs because they don't have practical work experience with these skills.

Only Gravel, Edwards, and Kucinich directly implicated U.S. trade policy. Obama delivered some typical Obama pap about "retraining". I wonder for which jobs he thinks people should be retrained? The tech jobs that are being outsourced? Richardson delivered some typical DLC pap about "education." Clinton was completely disingenuous about this, since she's shown far more interest in what India's business executives say about outsourcing than talking to actual Americans who have been affected.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

You'd almost think this is the terrorism equivalent of a horse's head in the bed
Posted by Jill | 7:06 AM
Remember that infamous scene from The Godfather when movie producer Jack Woltz woke up with the bloody severed head of his prize racehorse in his bed, placed there as a warning by the Corleone family after he refused to give Johnny Fontaine a movie role?

After years of having Tony Blair as his own personal valet, George W. Bush now has to deal with Gordon Brown. Brown has been a supporter of the Iraq War, but there's no guarantee that he's the kind of true believer in the PNAC neocon agenda that Blair was. So it's just perhaps a bit too convenient for George Bush that a car packed with fuel was found in London's West End early this morning.

However, it's worth noting that ABC News reported 11 days ago that the Taliban -- remember the Taliban -- the guys in Afghanistan we supposedly defeated before detouring to Iraq? -- had trained and dispatched teams of suicide bombers to the U.S. and Europe. If this morning's find is, in fact, just the first of many attacks to come, we will no doubt hear from not just the Bush Administration, but also from Rudy Giuliani, who despite putting his command center in the World Trade Center AFTER the 1993 attacks, is blaming Bill Clinton for 9/11, that only Republicans can keep us safe. With one major attack and perhaps teams of suicide bombers roaming the U.S. under their belts, Republicans have a very difficult case to make. Especially since the perpetrators of the 1993 attack were found, tried in legitimate American courts, convicted, and imprisoned, whereas Osama Bin Laden is not only still at large, but the unit put together to apprehend him was closed by the Bush administration. The Bush family always does take care of its friends.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Nancy Pelosi: Can't win, don't try
Posted by Jill | 6:33 AM
Who knew that Nancy Pelosi would end up adhering to the Bart Simpson view of the universe? In the rarefied Washington air of the Speaker, the sure bet (sic) of winning the White House in 2008 trumps any attempt at holding this Administration accountable for its crimes against the Constitution and the American people. In other words, it's all about the party (and presumably the Benjamins). And if that means that George W. Bush and especially Dick Cheney are never held accountable for their crimes, well so be it. After all, what is the Constitution when compared to the coffers of the DSCC?

Martin Bosworth at Scholars & Rogues was on a blogger conference call with Pelosi, and recognizes what I do, and what you do, and what other bloggers know -- but what Pelosi and the Democrats in Congress either don't know or don't care to know: that an Administration that views itself as above the law can do plenty of damage in two years:

I understand how tough the political process is in the best of environments–and this is anything but. Pelosi is a new Speaker leading the Dems back to power for the first time in 12 years, and she’s a woman, so she gets the 20 percent sexism tax attached to everything she does. I get that. Bush has stacked the government so thoroughly with “loyal Bushies” at every level, in all three branches, that it will take years to get rid of them and undo all their damage. I get that too.

But at the same time, when you look at the sneering defiance with which the Bush/Cheney axis refuses to comply with even the basic tenets of law, or how they’re incapable of passing any sort of legislation without it collapsing under the weight of its own bullshit, or any one of a million other crimes that have been committed under the aegis of the Worst President Ever, you have to ask yourself, “What the hell are we waiting for? How much power can a guy with a historically low approval rating really wield?”

Plenty. Bush’s veto pen can kill all of the progressive, forward-thinking legislation Pelosi wants to push, and without 60 Senators on board to override a veto, that’s that. And do not doubt he will do it–the man has proven time and again that he simply does not care what others think, and will happily kill any legislation out of spite, ignorance, or just plain meanness.

Bush has almost two years left to do incalculable damage and to continue to sully and stain the future and reputation of our country. At a time when the nation’s mindset is leaning more progressive left than ever, and we have strong enough leaders in Congress and elsewhere to make the change, it’s tough to accept that impeaching Bush (and Cheney) for their flagrant violations of law and ethics can’t be done. Right now, they are in the way of making this country a better place.

Indeed, the biggest obstacles to turning this country around are in the White House right now. And when an obstacle is in your way, you find a way around it, or you go through it. If we can’t get around them, then they need to go.


This is all pretty disheartening when viewed in the context of the Administration's view that Congressional subpoenas regarding the illegal domestic wiretapping program are an "unfortunate choice of confrontation" on the part of Congress.

When the executive branch is as out of control as this one is, Congress has an OBLIGATION to hold it to account. If an appeal to a partisan Supreme Court overturns an impeachment attempt, or subpoenas, or whatever other Constitutional measures are taken to hold this bunch to account, so be it. But at least you have to TRY. Betting the ranch on a Democratic presidential win when guys like David Gregory are out there defending the likes of Ann Coulter and partisan Secretaries of State still have the power to withhold voting machines from minority neighborhoods is a sucker bet.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, June 28, 2007

When bad things happen to people who aren't Bush cronies
Posted by Jill | 7:33 AM
The Gulf coast residents displaced by Hurricane Katrina are the forgotten citizens of this country -- forgotten by most Americans now, and not just forgotten, but actively screwed over by their leaders.

The GAO has issued a report on what a disaster the Bush Administration's handling of Katrina and its aftermath was, is, and will continue to be. Think Progress distills many of the salient points:

EPA allowed toxic chemicals to harm poor Katrina victims: A GAO report revealed that EPA publicly downplayed the risk of asbestos inhalation, which is often released during home demolition, to city residents and failed to deploy air monitors in predominantly African-American neighborhoods. Furthermore, EPA waited nearly eight months to inform residents that short-term visits could expose them to dangerous levels of asbestos and mold.


FEMA ignored its own hurricane plan: Prior to Katrina, FEMA created a “Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Backup Plan” which forecasted specific consequences and action-plans in the event of a hurricane. But “post-Katrina FEMA documents demonstrate that that the plan was never implemented.” The day before Katrina hit, FEMA Deputy Director Patrick Rhode sent an e-mail to Michael Brown’s assistant with the subject line, “copy of New Orleans cat plan,” stating, “I never got one — I think Brown got my copy — did you get one?”


FEMA guaranteed billions in profits for big companies: Following Katrina, federal agencies “doled out more than $2.4 billion in cost-plus contracts,” which “offer companies no incentive to save money or keep costs from ballooning.” FEMA was responsible for nearly 94 percent of all of the hurricane-related cost-plus contracts, with the remainder being issued primarily by the EPA and U.S. Air Force.




It's been said that Republicans say government doesn't work because they don't know how to make it work. There has never in my lifetime been an Administration and a Republican Party that has proven this adage more than this bunch. In its handling of one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit this country, just as in its handling of the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, this Administration has proven that if you are not one of its cronies and business partners, they don't even regard you as an American citizen. It's government of the cronies, by the cronies, and for the cronies. And if this country ever elects another Republican president, they deserve exactly what they get. Too bad they'll be carrying the rest of us with them.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Around the blogroll and elsewhere -- all girl edition
Posted by Jill | 7:25 PM
Happiness is a kabob house within walking distance when you're staying in an unfamiliar town that has horrific traffic on the main drag. That the owners are Iranian makes it not just delicious, but subversive too. So there.

Meanwhile, as I sit trying to decide whether to go to an evening session on using both sides of your brain, or one on how to determine if your coding sucks, or to just stay in my room and flip back and forth between Olbermann and the Mets (since the latter are on ESPN tonight), let's take a spin around and see what the rest of the world is saying tonight:

Joan Walsh points out the hypocrisy of wingnuts who want to silence everyone who disagrees with them, but think Ann Coulter advocating the assassination of a presidential candidate is perfectly OK. (Keep in mind that this is also a country in which a kid holding up a banner that says "Bong Hits for Jesus" isn't.) Here's what bothers me about the whole thing, aside from how conservatives are allowed to advocate murder of those who disagree and no one calls it terrorism: Chris Matthews is having entirely too good a time with this. If this builds ratings, are we going to see more of Ann Coulter on TV because she's good for ratings?

Melissa on how Mitt Romney is not only a fucking idiot, but isn't fit to own a dog.

Speaking of Republican idiots, Pam reports on another one: Rudy Giuliani (hearts) Regent University.

Lynn wrote about Ann Thrax last
March
. (Turn your pop-up blockers on before clicking!) If Lynn's right, maybe the best way to get her off the scene is to ignore her, since she seems to fear obscurity more than anything else.

BlueGal says that since Shakesville has been felled by a DOS attack, it's time for another Spartacus. Count me in. I AM SPARTACUS.

You must read Shortwoman's post on outsourcing.

Ah, they just want an excuse to do jello shots and ecstacy but make themselves puke after going to Quizno's. Kate Harding on how a substantial minority of Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 think fat is a greater threat to public health than drugs or alcohol.

One Brown Woman on the rise in use of skin-lightening creams in India. Is this what happens when Pradeep has to call herself Marcie when working Dell's call center?

Tata has a "Come to Jesus" moment. Or not.

Tami gets the birdseye lowdown on compact fluorescent lightbulbs.

Echidne on how a wife-murderer who at least has the decency to kill himself too gets absolved -- if he makes his living with muscles.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Ann Coulter, domestic terrorist
Posted by Jill | 7:19 AM
And here is the section of the very USA PATRIOT Act she so vigorously defends that applies:

(a) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

18 U.S.C. § 373(a).

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Good cop, bad cop
Posted by Jill | 7:13 AM
In a CNN interview, the author of the WaPo series on Dick Cheney states, "It's clear that the president knows what Dick Cheney is doing and it's clear the president could stop it."

But why should he?

It's clear that a calculated decision was made to make Dick Cheney the bad cop -- a role to which he is eminently suited and which he obviously wanted -- and let George W. Bush be the good cop -- the affable guy walking the beat, reassuring the people sitting on their stoops in the summer night that everything would be OK because he was on the beat.

And as such, if we lived in the country we all thought we did, both would be held accountable. However, we live in the United States, where the opposition party doesn't oppose and everyone is terrified of an Administration with a 30% approval rating.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Yay!
Posted by Jill | 9:57 PM
It's about fucking time:

More than half of Americans between 17 and 29 years old — 54 percent — say they intend to vote for a Democrat for president in 2008. They share with the public at large a negative view of President Bush, who has a 28 percent approval rating with this group, and of the Republican Party. They hold a markedly more positive view of Democrats than they do of Republicans.

Among this age group, Mr. Bush’s job approval rating after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, was more than 8 in 10. Over the course of the next three years, it drifted downward leading into the presidential election of 2004, when 4 out of 10 members of young Americans said they approved how Mr. Bush was handling his job.

At a time when Democrats have made gains after years in which Republicans have dominated Washington, young Americans appear to lean slightly more to the left than the general population: 28 percent described themselves as liberal, compared with 20 percent of the nation at large. And 27 percent called themselves conservative, compared with 32 percent of the general public.

Forty-four percent said they believed that same-sex couples should be permitted to get married, compared with 28 percent of the public at large. They are more likely than their elders to support the legalization of possession of small amounts of marijuana.

The findings on gay marriage were reminiscent of a survey of voters leaving the polls on election day 2004: 41 percent of 18-to-29-year-old voters said gay couples should be permitted to legally marry, according to an exit poll at the time.


The current generation of Americans who are about to reach voting age have seen what conservatism means. It means hate and bigotry and narrow-mindedness. To be young is to be by definition expansive. Conservatism flies in the face of what youth is. That young Americans are becoming more liberal means that the universe is once again ordered as it should be.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Ann Coulter has a right to say what she wants. She does not have the right to national exposure for it
Posted by Jill | 9:52 PM
How much longer are mainstream media outlets going to continue to give this woman a microphone?





Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Sometimes not being able to read blogs is not such a bad thing
Posted by Jill | 9:41 PM
Like today. If I'd read this before getting into the car and driving 270 miles today, I'd have screamed all the way to Bethesda:

A PEDOPHILE who raped a 10-year-old girl will be free in just four months after a British judge said his victim had "dressed provocatively".

Window cleaner Keith Fenn, 24, could have been jailed for life after twice attacking the girl in a riverside park.

Judge Julian Hall was at the centre of a storm over the "pathetic" sentence he imposed after hearing the girl had appeared much older than her age.

The same judge caused uproar earlier this year by setting free another paedophile and telling him to give his victim money "to buy a nice new bicycle".

In the latest case, Oxford Crown Court heard harrowing details of the assault on the 10-year-old. She was attacked in a park in South Oxfordshire by Fenn and his accomplice Darren Wright, 34, on October 14 last year.

Fenn removed all her clothes and raped her, then Wright took her to his home and sexually assaulted her.

Yet Judge Hall said the case was exceptional because the "young woman" had been wearing a frilly bra and thong.

The girl has been in local authority care since the age of four.

She was on her own when she met the pair in the street. They went to the park together. The judge said he faced a moral dilemma.

The court heard that the girl regularly wore make-up, strappy tops and jeans.


This may have taken place in England, but as western culture becomes more in thrall to Christian conservatives, we are going to see more of this.

(hat tip: Kate Harding)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Sorry, Mets fans, I can't stay out of town forever
Posted by Jill | 9:28 PM
Last Friday I headed for North Carolina for a family visit and birthday "celebration", about which the less said the better. Now I am halfway home, in Bethesda, for a Cold Fusion conference, and I can't wait to get home.

There's only one problem: The Mets haven't lost since I left town, and going into tonight's game were 3-1/2 games ahead of the Phillies and 4-1/2 ahead of the hated Atlanta Braves, who are near my current location playing the hapless Washington Nationals.

Meanwhile, the Mets had a better time on my birthday yesterday than I did, as they waited for Shawn Green to arrive at home plate from his home run trot in the 11th inning:



As of this moment, the Metropolitans are losing to the Cardinals and the Braves are beating the crap out of the D.C. Expos. Which means that I can go home on Friday after all.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Monday, June 25, 2007

The ones the war hawks don't think about
Posted by Jill | 4:50 PM
Via PJ Sauter comes this story of what George W. Bush's war policy hath wrought:

He lies flat, unseeing eyes fixed on the ceiling, tubes and machines feeding him, breathing for him, keeping him alive. He cannot walk or talk, but he can grimace and cry. And he is fully aware of what has happened to him.

Four years ago almost to this day, Joseph Briseno Jr. was shot in the back of the head at point-blank range in a Baghdad marketplace. His spinal cord was shattered, and cardiac arrests stole his vision and damaged his brain.

The 24-year-old is one of the most severely injured soldiers — some think the most injured soldier — to survive.

"Three things you would not want to be: blind, head injury, and paralyzed from the neck down. That's tough," said Dr. Steven Scott, head of the Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center at the Tampa VA Medical Center, where Briseno has twice been hospitalized for extensive care. In recent days, Briseno was hospitalized yet again, this time at the Washington, D.C., VA Medical Center.

As a high schooler, Briseno liked the Discovery Channel and CSI, and wanted to be a forensic scientist or investigator. He was 20, attending George Mason University, when he was called up from the reserves and sent to war.

After he was shot, he was flown to Kuwait and then to a military hospital in Landstuhl, Germany. His parents and two sisters rushed to his side.

"They told us, 'Prepare for his service.' That's how bad he was," said his father, Joseph Briseno Sr., a retired career Army man.

But he survived. From Germany, he went to Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, then to McGuire VA Medical Center in Richmond, Virginia. In December 2003, he went home, to Manassas Park, Virginia, where his parents, Joseph Sr. and Eva, quit their jobs to care for him.

"All our savings, all our money, was just emptied ... the 401(k)s, everything," said Joseph Briseno, who took a new job a year and a half ago to make ends meet.

The family has help from VA-provided nurses, but not around the clock. Jay's mother and father often do overnight duty, making sure their son is turned every four hours so he does not develop bedsores, which can become infected and threaten his life. If they do not turn him and keep him on schedule, he does not sleep well and becomes agitated.


What happens to Joseph Briseno when his parents can no longer care for him? Will Joe Lieberman pay for his care? Will Willian Kristol pay for his care? Will Michelle Malkin empty his bedpans and bathe him? Of course not. Briseno may be one of the most seriously wounded soldiers, but he isn't alone. The maimed are the forgotten ones of this war. The dead are buried and promptly forgotten by everyone other than their families, while the war hawks continue to slap Chinese-made ribbon magnets on their SUVs and impugn the patriotism of the rest of us. George W. Bush gives speeches about the lives of embryos and cares naught about this young man or any of the others whose blood can never be washed from his hands.

All for greed and lies and oil.

And the Democrats sit in Congress and worry about appearances. And John Boehner goes on a crying drunk rant in Congress asking "When we're gonna go get 'em?" I wonder that too, only I have a different "them" in mind....and a different approach to getting rid of "'em" -- one codified in the U.S. Constitution; the one of which the Democrats are so frightened.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Here's why there will never be accountability
Posted by Jill | 4:30 PM
Bookmark and Share

H-1Bs are not about finding the next Sergey Brin
Posted by Jill | 10:28 AM
They're about lowering the wage base for highly skilled workers in the US:

Bill Gates and Steven A. Ballmer of Microsoft have led a parade of high-tech executives to Capitol Hill, urging lawmakers to provide more visas for temporary foreign workers and permanent immigrants who can fill critical jobs.

Google has reminded senators that one of its founders, Sergey Brin, came from the Soviet Union as a young boy. To stay competitive in a “knowledge-based economy,” company officials have said, Google needs to hire many more immigrants as software engineers, mathematicians and computer scientists.

High-tech companies want to be able to hire larger numbers of well-educated, foreign-born professionals who, they say, can help them succeed in the global economy. For these scientists and engineers, they seek permanent-residence visas, known as green cards, and H-1B visas. The H-1B program provides temporary work visas for people who have university degrees or the equivalent to fill jobs in specialty occupations including health care and technology. The Senate bill would expand the number of work visas for skilled professionals, but high-tech companies say the proposed increase is not nearly enough. Several provisions of the Senate bill are meant to enhance protections for American workers and to prevent visa fraud and abuse.

High-tech companies were surprised and upset by the bill that emerged last month from secret Senate negotiations. E. John Krumholtz, director of federal affairs at Microsoft, said the bill was “worse than the status quo, and the status quo is a disaster.”

In the last two weeks, these businesses have quietly negotiated for changes to meet some of their needs. But the bill still falls far short of what they want, an outcome suggesting that their political clout does not match their economic strength.

Stephen W. Yale-Loehr, a co-author of a treatise on immigration law, said: “High-tech companies are very organized. They have numerous lobby groups. When Bill Gates advocates more H-1B visas and green cards for tech workers, everyone listens.

“But that supposed influence has not translated into legislative results,” Mr. Yale-Loehr, who teaches at Cornell Law School, continued. “High-tech companies have been lobbying unsuccessfully since 2003 for more H-1B visas. It’s hard to get anything through Congress these days. In addition, anti-immigrant groups are well organized. U.S. computer programmers are constantly arguing that H-1B workers undercut their wages.”


There is no shortage of American high-tech workers. There IS, however, a shortage of American high-tech workers who are under 30 and willing to work 100 hour weeks for pay competitive with programmers in Bangalore. To major in computer science is to commit yourself to a career path in which your top skills today will be obsolete in a year, that requires constant updating of skills, which don't make you any more marketable. Because if your current employer uses skill A, B, and C, and you teach yourself D, E, and F on the side, after you've trained your H-1B replacement, your next potential employer, which uses D, E, and F, won't hire you because you haven't used it on the job.

Who needs this?

American tech workers are going the way of manufacturing workers because the investment in continuing education, just so one can get shafted by employers constantly looking to cut costs while increasing the executive pay share of the pie, hardly seems worth the effort.

When companies tell American workers that the special commitments an IT career requires will be rewarded if they make the effort, and when companies stop deciding that anyone over 35 is too old to learn anything new, and when companies realize that the commitment to continuous updating of skills ought to be compensated accordingly, they won't need to hire foreign workers because there WILL be enough Americans to fill the need.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, June 24, 2007

Around the blogroll and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 12:24 PM
So here I am on a Sunday morning in Chapel Hill, NC, having slept a full night without a white cat deciding to appropriate my pillow as her own, and with my first waking sight being two deer staring right at me from the window of the room over my sister's garage that is affectionately known as the "Garage Mahal."

In such a bucolic setting, it's tempting to let the horrors of Life in the Bush Era just slide by, but instead let's take a look at what my compatriots in Blogtopia (®Skippy) are talking about today.

ModFab gives us ModFab's ways to Combat Blog Writer's Block (and my doing this link, I take care of #5).

Because family visits always involve some degree of talk about Weight Issues, I went to visit Kate Harding's place this morning in an attempt to salvage what little self-esteem I have. Given that I will be trying to find a new gynecologist this year that doesn't make you sign a malpractice waiver before she'll do a pap smear or advocate ridiculous crash diets, Kate's entry today on how overweight people are treated by the medical profession, and why it makes us less likely to even bother to get preventive care, let alone care for any active problems, was worth reading.

Cernig reports on Rahm Emmanuel actually planning to do something other than turn the Democratic Party into the Republican Party.

Why I Sometimes Wish I Still Did Movie Reviews: Because sometimes a movie like Sicko comes out that would allow me to blend blogging and reviewing. I may yet do a review after I see it next week, but meanwhile Ezra Klein gives us a sneak peek.

Amanda, no longer having to tiptoe around Bill Donohue, has the latest on Air America host Lionel's BFF.

Pachacutec asks John Edwards to please, kindly, grow a pair. While he's at it, he might ask Obama to do the same.

Be careful what you wish for, Digby -- you just might get it, and then what do we do? (Howie Klein has more on Rudy, the self-appointed Saint of 9/11.)

Frank Rich looks ahead to the sixth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks -- and sees more of the same. (Like this is a surprise?)

Hoffmania on Democratic branding.

Tata on the latest escapades of the Christofascist Zombie Brigade in South Carolina.

And in honor of Steve Gilliard, because dammit, someone has to pick up this particular mantle, let me just note that since I left town on Friday, the Mets have won two straight games and are now two games up on Philadelphia and 3-1/2 up on the suddenly hapless Atlanta Braves. (Does this mean I can't come home till October?) Metsgrrl explains why Paul LoDuca's outburst against the umpire in last night's 1-0 win is EXACTLY what the slumping New York Metropolitans (® Steve Somers) needed. Democratic Party, take note.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

The tipping point of evil, part II
Posted by Jill | 11:40 AM
On May 30 I posed the question: "What will it take to arouse the ire of the American people so that they demand that Nancy Pelosi put impeachment back on the table?"

Every day, as the Bush Administration racks up more crimes against the Constitution of the United States and declares itself subject to no existing law anywhere on the face of the earth, I find myself wondering: Is there a tipping point of evil beyond which a president and his administration can find themselves completely unaccountable? Is there a point where the crimes become so heinous that the will is just not there to remove the perpetrators from office because to do so would mean to acknowledge that there are times when our system just plain doesn't work?

The laws upon which this country was founded presupposed at least a modicum of good will on the part of those who would lead it. Checks and balances were built in to prevent any one individual or any one branch of government from gaining too much power. These were designed to protect us from the kinds of despotic individuals that would set themselves up as kings or dictators.

The words "no one could have anticipated..." have become hallmarks of the Bush Administration, but in the case of the way this bunch has circumvented every attempt by the Founding Fathers to make our system immune from people like them, it's clear that the men who rebelled against a king and created a new government, like the humanists they read, believed in the inherent good will of those that would seek to lead this nation. They never banked on bandits taking over and deciding that the laws codified in the Constitution didn't apply to them.

And so we find ourselves now with an administration and a party that puts its own gain and its own power not just ahead of the good of the nation, but supplanting the good of the nation, so that this country is now nothing but a fiefdom for the corporatocracy, to be plundered by those who seek ever more power and ever more money -- even if it means taking the entire country down.

And yet, Americans are still more interested in who the next Top Chef will be, or how Paris Hilton is doing in jail, or whether Angelina is pregnant again than they are in the world in which their kids will live.

Sometimes I wonder why people with children don't seem more engaged in the process, and why they don't seem to care about the crimes that their government is committing against them and their children. Is it really just about being too busy holding two jobs and taking the kids to soccer practice or is it something more? Is it a willful ignorance because to acknowledge what's happening is to be obligated to do something about it? Isn't part of being a parent and protecting your children protecting their future from those who would destroy it in the name of self-enrichment and the amassing of power?

In other words, do George W. Bush, Alberto Gonzales, and especially Dick Cheney, recognize that there is a kind of criminal tipping point beyond which Americans are unable to believing their government capable? And is that why as the exact nature of this bunch becomes ever more apparent, ever more brazen, and ever more appalling, the sound you hear is only that of crickets chirping?

Last week the Vice President of the United States blatantly declared himself to be not subject to any applicable law, making the indefensible statement that "vice presidency is a unique office that is neither a part of the executive branch nor a part of the legislative branch."

When you think that the last president was impeached for what was said to be lying about sex under oath in a civil case (even though "sex" in the case was defined to be "sexual intercourse, so technically it wasn't a lie), it makes it even more appalling that in a country that fancies itself to be all about law and order, an administration that declares itself to be not subject to any laws gets a free pass.

Meanwhile, Henry Waxman goes through the motions of hearings, while the party he represents has shown itself to be lacking the courage to protect this nation from the criminals now sitting in the executive branch and their lackeys in the Senate and House. Instead, they, just like the president and his war in Iraq, choose to run out the clock rather than honor the many hundreds of thousands of soldiers who have died over the last 231 years defending this country by providing the oversight and accountability for which they were elected.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share