"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, August 13, 2005

Americans silent over gas prices
Posted by Jill | 7:05 PM

Remember back in 2000, when Americans were screaming bloody murder over gas prices?

Here's Joseph Farah of World Nut Daily on June 27, 2000:

Here are some more facts: The cost of crude oil 18 months ago was $10 a barrel. It is in excess of $30 today. Because we as a nation have grown more dependent on foreign oil, we are paying the inevitably higher prices that follow such political irresponsibility.

So, let's figure this out: Retail marketing costs for gasoline are about 15 percent. Federal excise taxes are about 17 percent. Then the Clinton administration comes along and decides it's best for our nation if we produce less oil and grow more dependent.

Sixty percent of federal land is now off limits to oil drilling. Offshore the situation is even more restrictive. Forty-three million acres of federal land is off limits even to road building, which means you can't even think about drilling.

On top of all that, it is the Clinton-Gore Environmental Protection Agency that has imposed tough new blended-gas regulations that added 25 cents to the cost of a gallon of gas.

What's Gore's latest response? As gasoline prices and frustration at the pumps soar, he unveils a Carteresque multibillion-dollar national energy strategy that includes a proposal for weaning America off its reliance on foreign oil with tax incentives for building and buying energy-saving products.

That's what I would call way too little, way too late.


Let's fast-forward now, shall we?

Today is August 13, 2005. Oil is at $67 a barrel. Average pump price nationwide is $2.41. And Bush just signed a so-called "energy bill", about which he said:

...the bill I sign today will help diversify our energy supply by promoting alternative and renewable energy sources. The bill extends tax credits for wind, biomass, landfill gas and other renewable electricity sources. The bill offers new incentives to promote clean, renewable geothermal energy. It creates a new tax credit for residential solar power systems. And by developing these innovative technologies, we can keep the lights running while protecting the environment and using energy produced right here at home. When you hear us talking about less dependence on foreign sources of energy, one of the ways to become less dependent is to enhance the use of renewable sources of energy.


Joseph Farah is curiously silent. And so are the same Americans who were screaming bloody murder when they were paying a buck and a quarter during the Clinton years.
Bookmark and Share

If Bush cares about the troops so much, let him get them some fucking body armor!
Posted by Jill | 6:59 PM

NYT:

For the second time since the Iraq war began, the Pentagon is struggling to replace body armor that is failing to protect American troops from the most lethal attacks by insurgents.

The ceramic plates in vests worn by most personnel cannot withstand certain munitions the insurgents use. But more than a year after military officials initiated an effort to replace the armor with thicker, more resistant plates, tens of thousands of soldiers are still without the stronger protection because of a string of delays in the Pentagon's procurement system.

The effort to replace the armor began in May 2004, just months after the Pentagon finished supplying troops with the original plates - a process also plagued by delays. The officials disclosed the new armor effort Wednesday after questioning by The New York Times, and acknowledged that it would take several more months or longer to complete.

Citing security concerns, the officials declined to say exactly how many more of the stronger plates were needed, or how much armor had already been shipped to Iraq.

"We are working as fast as we can to complete it as soon as we can," Maj. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sorenson, the Army's deputy for acquisition and systems management, said Wednesday in an interview at the Pentagon.

While much of the focus on casualties in Iraq has been on soldiers killed by explosive devices aimed at vehicles, body armor remains critical to the military's goals in Iraq. Gunfire has killed at least 325 troops, about half the number killed by bombs, according to the Pentagon.

Among the problems contributing to the delays in getting the stronger body armor, the Pentagon is relying on a cottage industry of small armor makers with limited production capacity. In addition, each company must independently come up with its own design for the plates, which then undergo military testing. Just four vendors have begun making the enhanced armor, according to military and industry officials. Two more companies are expected to receive contracts by next month, while 20 or more others have plates that are still being tested.


Uh, maybe you just don't go to war unless you have the right supplies?
Bookmark and Share

Wal-Mart Employees in Summary Execution of Shoplifter
Posted by Jill | 11:42 AM

This ought to make law 'n' order conservatives in Texas happy:

A man suspected of shoplifting goods from an Atascocita Wal-Mart — including diapers and a BB gun — had begged employees to let him up from the blistering pavement in the store's parking lot where he was held, shirtless, before he died Sunday, a witness said.

An autopsy for the man, identified as Stacy Clay Driver, 30, of Cleveland, was scheduled for Monday, but officials said results probably would be delayed by a wait for toxicology tests.

Driver's family, as well as one emergency worker, are questioning company procedure, including whether Wal-Mart workers administered CPR after they realized he needed medical attention.

When Atascocita Volunteer Fire Department paramedics arrived, Driver was in cardiac arrest, said Royce Worrell, EMS director. Worrell said Monday he heard from investigators that Wal-Mart employees administered CPR to Driver, but he was not sure that happened.

"When we got there, the man was facedown (in cardiac arrest) with handcuffs behind his back," Worrell said. "That's not indicative of someone given CPR."


Texas and Wal-Mart: Perfect together.
Bookmark and Share

Well, this is a relief
Posted by Jill | 8:50 AM

I get the sense that someone ran the name of Bush's old Skull and Bones buddy Robert McCallum to take over as Patrick Fitzgerald's boss up the flagpole and nobody saluted. In fact, Michael Isikoff and bloggers everywhere pointed out that assigning a buddy of the president whose staffers are being investigated to oversee the guy conducting the investigation was not qualitatively different from Nixon firing Archibald Cox.

So the Administration has backed off. Instead, the departing Deputy Attorney General James Comey, has made the pick, assigning instead one David Margolis, a 40-year veteran of the Justice Department.

I suspect this means they're going to go the pardon route when indictments come down. If Rove is indicted, he'll be pardoned on the grounds that "the President needs his wise counsel during these trying times." Bush's supporters will think he's talking about war and terrorism. We will know that he's talking about his poll numbers.
Bookmark and Share

Courage, "resoluteness", a foolish consistency, and the Daddy state
Posted by Jill | 8:10 AM

Digby points us to this graven image of the god that is not Jehovah which the wingnuts worship, many of them the same ones who want the Ten Commandments posted everywhere.

Here's the rationale for purchasing this graven image:

President Bush is a Leader who has the courage to lead. It is political courage. It is not poll driven it is conviction driven. It is consistent and does not change because of pressure or threats of political survival. It is reconfirmed every day. It differs from combat courage in that it is thought oriented not reaction oriented. Combat courage does not necessarily translate into political courage. Combat courage is admirable and you only know if you have it when you are in combat. President Bush has demonstrated that he has political courage and this is why he was re-elected. By owning a bust of President Bush, Commander in Chief you will be making a statement and in a politically charged environment, it takes courage.


The other night I was at the home of a friend, her ardent and staunch Republican mother in attendance. The mother said that she likes George W. Bush because "he's honest." Her feeling was that Bush is honest because he's too stupid to be anything else, which is hardly a ringing endorsement, but when you talk to Bush supporters, the same themes keep coming to the forefront -- honesty, straightforwardness, resoluteness. These have largely replaced the "He's a guy you'd want to have a beer with" meme, which I suppose is fortunate, for while Barney Gumble is a funny character on The Simpsons, I'm not sure that hanging out at the corner bar is a qualification for the presidency.

This theme of constancy, though, is something we see in childrearing guides, particularly when dealing with children after trauma. The National Association for the Education of Young Children, in an article written after the tsunami in the south Pacific earlier this year, states:

it is important to remember that young children may be especially affected by disasters. Families and others who care for young children need to provide comfort, reassurance, and stability.

The most important thing families and other adults can do is make sure children aren't over-exposed to media coverage of the disaster. More than any other action, avoiding media coverage will protect children from confusing and disturbing images.

When young children witness troubling events, directly or on television, they are likely to feel afraid and confused. Images of destruction and suffering can cause high anxiety and even panic. Young children are most fearful when they do not understand what is happening around them. Their strong feelings and reactions are natural and should be expected.

[snip]

Offer reassurance through physical closeness.
Holding children brings comfort and a sense of security. Children may need extra hugs, smiles and hand-holding. If they seem worried, tell them they are safe and that there is someone there to take care of them. Hearing a family member or a teacher say, "I will take care of you," helps children feel safe. Young children have great faith in the competence of adults and respond to adult reassurances.

Maintain structure.
Children need consistency and security in their day, especially when the world around them seems confusing or unpredictable, or when adults are preoccupied or upset. Provide a framework that stays the same from day to day. Emphasize familiar routines at playtime, clean-up, naptime, meals, and bedtime. Make sure children get appropriate sleep, exercise, and nutrition. Children may find it difficult to accept routines and limits, but persevere by being firm, calm, and supportive. Make decisions for children when they cannot cope with choice.



In the nearly four years since 9/11, Americans have been like the young children who are the subject of the above article, and they have responded to the President's "consistent" message the way a child would -- as a sign that everything's going to be OK, instead of as an adult should -- by comparing the message to the reality and realizing that this president isn't "resolute", he's delusional.

Changing one's mind and one's approach in light of new evidence is what an adult does. Only a child continues to insist that Santa Claus is real even after catching Mommy and Daddy putting the presents under the tree and eating the cookies. But this insistence on believing everything George Bush says is a symptom of the persistent juvenile state in which American adults have wallowed since 9/11. His "consistency" and the petulant way he has of continuing to insist that the Iraq war ws the right thing to do are reassuring to adults who are still unable to accept that there's nothing special about our status as Americans that is going to keep us safe in this current world. It's that reassurance that keeps them from facing the lies that he told about why he wanted to go to war in Iraq. Because if Daddy doesn't know what he's talking about, it feels to many people as if the rug was pulled out from under them.

In view of the evidence that has come to light that the war was entered under false pretenses, with information they cooked up themselves, and that they haven't got a clue where to go next, other than to continue the failed tactics we're currently using, Bush supporters are like children after the tornado hits, crouched in the corner in a fetal position, sucking their thumbs and waiting for Daddy's reassurance that the danger is past and everything is OK.

In a child, a need for a Daddy who knows everything and who makes them "feel safe" is important and necessary. In an adult, it's pathetic.
Bookmark and Share
Friday, August 12, 2005

This is what a principled conservative sounds like about Cindy Sheehan
Posted by Jill | 1:56 PM

We've all seen the attack dogs come out against Cindy Sheehan for any number of things -- refusing to be silent, making Dear Leader look bad, and the unforgivable sin of changing her mind (which she hasn't).

ONE conservative in Blogtopia has the courage (unlike some of the wingnuts who take such delight in playing in our sandbox) to speak out against the disgusting attacks on a bereaved mother who wants the truth.

The Cunning Realist:

The essence of the right-wing smear machine's "outing" of Cindy Sheehan is her supposed flip-flop from supporting President Bush in 2004 to disapproving of him in 2005. As details of this have become clearer, it's obvious the flip-flop is nothing more than a canard. But setting aside the Sheehan story for a moment, have any of the shameless smearsters seen the public opinion polls recently? Here's some breaking news for them: a whole lot of Americans who supported Bush a year ago---including an increasingly large part of his "base"---have turned against him. And that includes many millions of people who haven't lost a parent, child, or sibling in Iraq.

There are so many side issues of shamelessness and crass opportunism in this story it makes my head spin. Think about the gall of a political and media machine "accusing" a private citizen of changing her mind (imagine that!) about an elected and supposedly accountable public official. When did a private citizen supposedly changing her opinion about something rise to the same level as a flip-flop about firing anyone involved in the leaking a CIA agent's name? At what point did the ability to change one's mind about a politician become something to be ridiculed and accused of instead of cherished as a basic right? And it's not as if in the past year we haven't learned anything about the pre-war manipulation of intelligence, as well as the incompetent planning, that resulted in the death of Cindy Sheehan's son and thousands of others like him.

Something else about this story that infuriates me is the vision of feckless, smarmy smearsters and cowards hiding behind keyboards in cities like Washington and New York (and yes, Miami), punching out electronic missives in a pathetic and desperate attempt to impugn the integrity of a woman sitting in the dust and August heat of Texas---a woman who, along with her dead son, embodies everything that's right about this country. The growing division between the professional class of spinning punditry and the vast expanse of Middle America that actually does the working, the fighting and the dying so the pundits can spend their time chattering has never been more clear than with this story.

If I had lost a parent, child or sibling in Iraq, I'd be right next to Cindy Sheehan sitting in that dust and heat. And I wouldn't budge until the president---ensconced within that reassuring bubble of faith, brush-clearing and mountain bike-riding---found a few moments to come listen to me. I hope as many people as possible join her protest and offer her food, water, and whatever legal or media assistance she may need.

In the meantime, it behooves the rest of us to do our part and engage in some "outing" of our own. That includes identifying and relentlessly shaming those who have become so unmoored from morality that not only have they abandoned the uniquely American ideals of accountability and sacrifice, they openly ridicule them.


Word.

Those who would attack this woman ought to be ashamed of themselves. But of course they aren't. Fascists never are.
Bookmark and Share

If the shoe fits...
Posted by Jill | 12:01 PM

It's hard not to do the math.

Steve Gillard received an interesting e-mail that's worth your time.
Bookmark and Share

If you build it, they will come
Posted by Jill | 9:38 AM

Remember that speech that James Earl Jones gives towards the end of Field of Dreams:

The one constant through all the years, Ray, has been baseball. America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It's been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt, and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. This field, this game, is a part of our past, Ray. It reminds us of all that once was good, and that could be again. Oh people will come, Ray. People will most definitely come.


And remember that last shot of cars lining up for miles, making the pilgrimage to Ray's cornfield, to try to recapture "all that once was good"?

I'm reminded of that every time I hear about the many Americans whose lives have been affected by Bush's game of Biggest Dickus in Iraq, who are dropping everything and going to Crawford, Texas to wait with Cindy Sheehan.

Here's an aggregation of articles about just some of them.
Bookmark and Share

Al Qaeda wants the 9/11 Bush-Worship and Goosestep to go on
Posted by Jill | 8:19 AM

What city is missing from this picture?

A group of F.B.I. counterterrorism analysts warned this week of possible terrorist attacks in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago around Sept. 11, but officials cautioned on Thursday that they were skeptical about the seriousness of the threat.

The warning grew out of intelligence developed from an overseas source indicating that terrorists might seek to steal fuel tanker trucks in order to inflict "mass casualties" by staging an anniversary attack, officials said.

The information led F.B.I. joint terrorism task forces in Los Angeles and Newark to alert other government and law enforcement officials privately this week about the threat, law enforcement officials said. Several government officials in Washington who were briefed on the threat said it was described as credible and specific enough to warrant attention.

But other law enforcement officials in Washington and New York said that while they were aware of the warnings and were concerned about the Sept. 11 anniversary, they remained somewhat skeptical about the latest threat.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was planning to send out another confidential law enforcement bulletin on Thursday to qualify the earlier one and emphasize that the threat of a possible tanker attack had not been verified.

"The information is uncorroborated, and the source is of questionable reliability," said Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security. "This information continues to be evaluated by the intelligence community."


How typical is this? Bush's ratings are in the toilet, his dilemma about Karl Rove is back in the press and the fingers are starting to point right at his office, Cindy Sheehan is a bee buzzing around his bonnet, so of course we're going to have terrorist threats of "questionable credibility. After all, it works for him every time, doesn't it? Keep 'em scared, keep 'em controlled, that's the Bush Junta's motto.

Now, you'd think that Al Qaeda would WANT to stage an attack during a Biggest Dickus celebration like the one Rummy is planning for 9/11, wouldn't you? Unless, of course, Al Qaeda is on the Administration's SIDE, via the close and enduring friendship between the Bush Family and Osama Bin Laden, in which case you'd target cities FULL OF LIBERALS, so as to kill two birds with one stone, as it were -- get rid of a bunch of Democratic voters and keep the heartland scared shitless.

Hell, you could blame it on Iran too, while you're at it, and finally be able to launch those nukes you've been wanting to set off for five years.
Bookmark and Share

The Bush/Rove conundrum
Posted by Jill | 7:40 AM


Here's Bush's dilemma:

If Karl Rove lied to Bush about his involvement in the leak of Valerie Plame's name, then Bush is protecting a staff member who lied to him, and in addition, Rove is in some doo-doo over the federal false statement statute.

If Rove told the truth to Bush, then Bush is participating in a Nixon-style cover-up.

Not a pretty position in which to be in for C-Plus Caligula, now, is it?

It's pretty clear that Bush simply cannot fire Karl Rove. Rove has had this peculiar doppelgänger relationship with Bush for years, and he knows where the proverbial bodies are buried. If Bush fires Rove, an angry, vengeful Turdblossom could spill a lot of beans the Bush Crime Family doesn't want spilled. Or, he could find himself dead in a bathtub -- another convenient suicide of a Bush family enemy.
Bookmark and Share

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 7:31 AM


"To take a nation to war on the basis of any provocation that bears the smell of fraud is to risk losing national leadership's commitment when the going gets rough. When our soldiers' bodies start coming home in high numbers, and reverses in the field are discouraging, a guilty conscience in a top leader can become the Achilles heel of a whole country." -- the late Adm. James Stockdale, The Stoic Warrior's Triad
Bookmark and Share

Green Day: It's not just for punkass kids anymore
Posted by Jill | 7:26 AM

I knew there was a reason why I wanted a copy of American Idiot.

Yeah, sure, the vignette in the beginning sounds cringeworthy, but as someone who WAS a teenaged girl at one point, THIS IS HOW TEENAGED GIRLS TALK IN SUCH A SITUATION.

Aside from encompassing in one seven-minute video the mindset of the red-state kids who enlist, there's some damn slick production here -- and someone studied his Full Metal Jacket very carefully, to the point of lifting scenes right from the film.

But you know what's depressing? I can't believe we have to go through this yet again. One would have thought we'd learned after Vietnam, but no -- power-hungry, craven leaders are still sending America's future off to die for no fucking good reason.
Bookmark and Share

Friday Tinfoil Blogging
Posted by Jill | 6:50 AM

OK, this is Alex Jones, who never met a conspiracy theory he didn't like, but given that the military brass are not exactly thrilled with their bosses these days, who knows?

The head of Fort Monroe's Training and Doctrine Command, four star general Kevin P. Byrnes, was fired Tuesday apparently for sexual misconduct according to official sources.

Other sources however have offered a different explanation for Byrnes' dismissal which ties in with the Bush administration's unpopular plan to attack Iran and the staged nuclear attack in the US which would provide the pretext to do so.

According to reporter Greg Szymanski, anonymous military sources said that Brynes was the leader of a faction that was preparing to instigate a coup against the neo-con hawks in an attempt to prevent further global conflict.

Indications are that, much like popular opinion amongst the general public, half the military oppose the neo-con's agenda and half support it.

Further revelations were imparted by journalist Leland Lehrman who appeared today on The Alex Jones Show.

Lehrman's army sources, including a former Captain in intelligence, became outraged when they learned that the official story behind 9/11 was impossible.

They told Lehrman that the imminent Northcom nuclear terror exercise based in Charleston, S.C, where a nuclear warhead is smuggled off a ship and detonated, was originally intended to 'go live' - as in the drill would be used as the cover for a real false flag staged attack.

This website has relentlessly discussed similar style drills which took place on the morning of 9/11 and on the morning of 7/7 in London.

"Speculation exists that he had potentially discovered the fact that it was gonna go live and that he was trying to put a stop to it or also speculation indicates that he may be part of a military coup designed to prevent the ridiculous idea of doing a nuclear war with Iran, " said Lehrman.

Lehrman said that other sources had told him all army leave had been cancelled from September 7th onwards, opening the possibility for war to be declared within that time frame.

Northcom officials also admitted to Lehrman that CNN had been using its situation room as a studio.

Earlier this week, Washington Post reported that the Pentagon has developed its first ever war plans for operations within the continental United States, in which terrorist attacks would be used as the justification for imposing martial law on cities, regions or the entire country.

American Conservative Magazine recently reported that Dick Cheney had given orders to immediately invade Iran after the next terror attack in the US, even if there was no evidence Iran was involved.

Government and media mouthpieces have been fearmongering for weeks about how a nuclear attack within the US is imminent.

Now would be the most opportune time for the Globalists to stage a major attack, as it would head off any potential indictments against the Bush administration for their involvement in illegally outing CIA agent Valerie Plame.

While rumors circulating about indictments having already taken place against Bush and Cheney should rightly be treated very carefully, the fact that there is an ongoing criminal investigation into the matter is something that's admitted and shouldn't be viewed as speculation.


OK, well then...obviously the first thing to do before commenting on a story like this is to consider the sources. What I've always found disturbing about Alex Jones is that there's always just enough truth or plausability in his ravings to make you think, "Well, maybe...." But Jones is one of those Israel/Mossad/CIA Axis Jewish Conspiracy nuts, as is Leland Lehrman. But let's face it folks, in the aftermath of Operation Northwoods, and given some of the stuff about 9/11 that's just plain odd, if not outright disturbing, the idea of Bushcheney ordering a fake attack on a U.S. city in order to create a pretext for attacking Iran seems all too possible. After all, ginning up intelligence just isn't going to cut it anymore, so a new tactic is necessary.
Bookmark and Share

One voice from a red state weighs in
Posted by Jill | 6:40 AM

From Bart Whiteman in The Chattanoogan:

I am always puzzled by big tough guys who claim to want to teach all the bad guys of the world a lesson, but at the same time they shrink from a meeting with an unarmed, middle-aged woman sitting in the shade on a hot August day in a folding chair and wearing culottes. If this menace scares them so much, what would happen if they really had to go toe-to-toe with a very, very bad guy not so delicately dressed? George has avoided using the driveway since the vigil began. Fortunately, he has a personal helicopter to make trips to the drug store and to sign mega-bucks bills related to oil and transportation that are not likely to help the average consumer at all in the near future, but will put gobs of bucks in the hands of his corporate cronies in a hurry. Let’s see, is there a tie between oil and transportation? Oh, I get it.

George W. can probably safely duck one woman for awhile, maybe forever. But what if another mother with a son killed in the Iraq War joins Cindy Sheehan? What if two join? Three? Four? Five? Six? What if some children whose fathers aren’t coming back join the crowd? What if all the people in Iraq who have needlessly had family members killed by George’s actions find a way to get to Texas? Crawford could start looking like a big city.

What if the father of an American daughter killed in Iraq joins the growing metropolis? George might consider moving to New Mexico.

So far, George attempts to console the grieving have been about as lame as they come. It would appear that he has never suffered a moment of grief in his entire life, which may be true. The thin consolation he offers is becoming less palatable with each passing day. Fewer and fewer people are going to accept his sad testimony as a reason to just keep on going and add to the body count and add to the grief. He will have to offer more. He may even have to meet with all the Mrs. Sheehans at the end of his driveway. What a sacrifice he will have made.

Meanwhile, Bush is willing to meet with his dwindling crew of supporters to decide what to do next. Somehow, no one in his camp has had a quiet moment to sit with him during the past few years to say: “Look, George, forget about an exit strategy for the war. What about an exit strategy for yourself? You have walked into a boxed canyon. No one made you do it. You did it all by yourself.”

What is sadder than our President’s pattern of avoidance is the word that somehow Mrs. Sheehan’s vigil is “waking up the national media” to the fact that maybe this infernal war should be questioned. Where have these idiots been? Who robbed them of their eyes and ears? Are they that in love with the corporate trough that supplies their feeding tubes that they have chosen to overlook the obvious waste from the beginning of the war that has not abated an iota since? What will it take to wake this legion of passionless automatons?


Drip drip drip drip...
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, August 11, 2005

Cindy
Posted by Jill | 10:25 AM

This is why they hate her:

As for Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Michelle Malkin, Matt Drudge, etc...nothing you can say can hurt me or make me stop what we are doing. We are working for peace with justice. We are using peaceful means and the truth to do it. I guess the truth frightens people. It frightens them so much, they have to resort to telling lies to rebut my arguments. They are despicable human beings and not even worth our concern.


They can't touch her, and they know it. She's breaking through the wall of their denial and they can't cope. Isn't it funny how so many people who spearhead movements that actually change things are women?
Bookmark and Share

This is a "Freedom Walk"?
Posted by Jill | 10:12 AM

The Carpetbagger Report notes that if you want to join the chickenhawk wingnuts in goosestepping around Washington DC to "celebrate" the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks in Don Rumsfeld's Leni Riefenstahl-esque "Freedom Walk", you'll have to pass muster with the Feds:

Participants are encouraged to arrive at the Pentagon South parking lot between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m. for screening to avoid long lines. The first 1,000 to arrive for screening at the Pentagon on September 11, will receive the official America Supports You campaign lapel pin.


As the Report notes:

That's right, in order to participate in a government-sponsored "Freedom Walk" on public streets past public monuments, from one outdoor public landmark to another, you have to give your name address, phone number, and email address to the Pentagon.


By contrast, if you want to join Cindy Sheehan's vigil, or march against the war, or march with the TRUE defenders of American freedom, all you have to do is show up.
Bookmark and Share

Outside of James Dobson's world, we call this "child sex abuse"
Posted by Jill | 7:43 AM

Via just about everybody (including Norbizness, Sadly No, and Bradford Plumer), come James Dobson's tips for detecting if your son is showing "pre-homosexual tendencies". Go read their comments and links to the tips, but I just have to share with you the money quote from Dobson's prescription for a "cure":

the boy's father has to do his part. He needs to mirror and affirm his son's maleness. He can play rough-and-tumble games with his son, in ways that are decidedly different from the games he would play with a little girl. He can help his son learn to throw and catch a ball. He can teach him to pound a square wooden peg into a square hole in a pegboard. He can even take his son with him into the shower, where the boy cannot help but notice that Dad has a penis, just like his, only bigger.


Yup, naked showers with Dad, complete with games of "Mine's Bigger" are the way to ensure your son grows up straight. Uh-huh.

I knew my analysis of why George W. Bush felt he had to go to war with Iraq was correct.
Bookmark and Share

He who controls the message controls the world
Posted by Jill | 7:15 AM

Good thing Google bought Blogger, or else we might be moving to Powerblogs or Typepad sooner than we thought. Because Rupert Murdoch says he wants to control as much of the content on the Internet as he can:

Rupert Murdoch has announced his intention to dominate the internet the way he dominates newspapers in Australia, and traditional media around the world.

Having recently bought MySpace.com, which he describes as a place "where people put their lives online", News Corp now has 50 million people visiting its websites.

MySpace.com has 24 million of these, which he said was growing at 100,000 people a day, "without any promotion".

Mr Murdoch has recently announced he is bringing all his internet ventures into one division called Fox Interactive Media.

Not all of his newest customers are happy with Fox's plans.

The wire service Associated Press last week reported that some MySpace users "fear" Mr Murdoch's influence.

"There are a lot of counterculture people on MySpace," Scott Swiecki, 34, a member of the MySpace group Faux News told AP. "My concern is Fox will add fees and censor content."

After the sale was announced, some MySpace members added a profile for Mr Murdoch - straight, married, 74 - which says he has joined the site for "networking" and lists his occupation as "world domination".

Today, during a press conference to announce News Corp's annual results, Mr Murdoch said there was "no greater priority for the company today than to meaningfully and profitably expand our internet presence".

Mr Murdoch, who has spent his life building a worldwide media empire, said that with strategic acquisitions "we can very quickly become the major player in this industry".

"News Corp, at its core, is about content. The web, at its core, is about personal choice. What we are aiming to do is to combine the two.

"Our leadership in news, sports and entertainment programming will give access to the best content available, and with the acquisition and development of a full array of web tools, whether it be more advanced search, email, customisation, accessibility, even voice communication, News will be able to personalise your experience to take advantage of the vastness of the internet as a whole."


Translation: We will make sure that you only get the information we want you to have, so all those pesky bloggers who don't support endless war and me running everything are hereby on notice.
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, August 10, 2005

WTF???
Posted by Jill | 7:53 PM

USA Today has drunk the Bush Junta's kool-aid. Now they're claiming too that utter horseshit is just "an alternative fact":


Evolution lacks fossil link
By D. Chris Buttars

The campaign to eliminate God from the public forum has been going on for decades, having accelerated greatly since the Supreme Court's ill-advised decision in 1963 to eliminate prayer from public schools. And I believe those fighting against the teaching of intelligent design in schools have an ulterior motive to eliminate references to God from the entire public forum.
The argument over classroom discussion of evolution vs. divine design is just the latest attack on everything that would mention a belief in God. If you talk against Darwinian evolution in the classroom, you immediately incur the rage of those who don't want God discussed in any way, shape or form.

These vehement critics claim that there are mountains of scientific proof that man evolved from some lower species also related to apes. But in this tremendous effort to support Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, in all these "mountains of information," there has not been any scientific fossil evidence linking apes to man.

The trouble with the "missing link" is that it is still missing! In fact, the whole fossil chain that could link apes to man is also missing! The theory of evolution, which states that man evolved from some other species, has more holes in it than a crocheted bathtub.


But "I don't understand it....it must be magic!" (TMMarc Maron) doesn't?

Of course, what can one expect from an editorial written by a South Park character?
Bookmark and Share

Keith Olbermann is in trouble and needs our support
Posted by Jill | 3:46 PM

Keith Olbermann may be the last real journalist in America. The other night, as part of his coverage of the death of Peter Jennings, Olbermann went into some rather graphic detail about his own bout with what he feared was oral cancer. This account can also be seen on his blog.

As Bob Cesca reports at The Huffington Post, this did not sit will with The Suits Upstairs, and quotes the Daily News:

I hear that MSNBC staffers in the Secaucus newsroom-studio watched in horror Monday night as the volatile Kaplan, the president of the cable outlet, publicly laced into the eccentric Olbermann, anchor of the 8 p.m. show "Countdown," after the latter eulogized lung-cancer victim Peter Jennings with a graphic rant about his own cancer scare.

Olbermann - a former pipe and cigar smoker - is said to have looked stunned as Kaplan raced onto the set and shouted at him after he signed off.

Olbermann had urged viewers to quit smoking and repeatedly mentioned "spitting blood" and "spitting globs of myself into a garbage can" while discussing his bout with a benign tumor in in his mouth.

I'm told that Kaplan erupted angrily and at length, calling Olbermann "out of control" and "not to be trusted," and accusing him of driving away viewers from the 9 p.m. debut of Kaplan hire Rita Cosby's show, "Live and Direct."

Kaplan - a friend and former ABC News colleague of Jennings, and a frequent cigar smoker - apparently got even angrier when Olbermann suggested that the reason he was upset was that "this is about you."

I'm told that the anchor quietly asked the news exec to move the discussion to a private location, but the enraged Kaplan wouldn't hear of it.

"I don't care if you don't come to work tomorrow," Kaplan told Olbermann, according to my spies.


Olbermann is right. He hit a sore spot (no pun intended) with Kaplan because Kaplan is a cigar smoker. Trust me when I tell you that smokers all over America were turning off the television set every time a story relating Jennings' death to cancer came on. They know they should quit, but they can't. And the government is still subsidizing what is a highly addictive drug at the same time as they're putting kids in jail for a quarter-ounce of pot.

Isn't it funny how one person's first-person account using the word "blood" is regarded as inappropriate, but Joe Scarborough has been almost literally drooling on a nightly basis with speculation about what happened to Natalee Holloway on that beach in Aruba -- which is in particularly bad taste given the mysterious death of his young female assistant in his office. You didn't hear about that one, did you. I thought not.

At any rate, Olbermann is the best thing on MSNBC. He's honest, he pulls no punches, and if he goes, then television news really DOES become just a vast wasteland of Bush Junta propaganda.

Write to Rick Kaplan and tell him if the shoe fits, wear it:

Mr. Rick Kaplan
President/General Manager
MSNBC
1 MSNBC Plaza
Secaucus, NJ 07094-2419

Or send an E-mail: rick.kaplan@msnbc.com
Bookmark and Share

Dying for female genital mutiliation
Posted by Jill | 3:41 PM

Here's some of the "freedom" Iraqis are "enjoying" as a result of Bush's war:

KIRKUK, IRAQ – Set on an arid plain southeast of Kirkuk, Hasira looks like a place forsaken by time. Sheep amble past mud-brick houses and the odd sickly palm tree shades children's games. There is no electricity.
Yet along with 39 other villages in this region that Iraq's Kurds have named Germian (meaning hot place), Hasira and its people have become noted for presenting the first statistical evidence in Iraq of the existence of female circumcision, or female genital mutilation (FGM), as critics call it.

"We knew Germian was one of the areas most affected by the practice," says Thomas von der Osten-Sacken, director of a German nongovernmental organization called WADI, which has been based in Iraq for more than a decade.

Of 1,554 women and girls over 10 years old interviewed by WADI's local medical team, 907, or more than 60 percent, said they had had the operation. The practice is known to exist throughout the Middle East, particularly in northern Saudi Arabia, southern Jordan, and Iraq. There is also circumstantial evidence to suggest it is present in Syria, western Iran, and southern Turkey.

But while this practice was suspected in the region, there was never solid proof that the procedure was so prevalent.


This is the Islamic theocracy that's coming to Iraq. Aren't you glad 1800 young Americans have died for this?

ClearChannel is...they're throwing a big anti-Cindy Sheehan barbecue this Saturday, hoping the free food will bring out the lunatics. I guess they figure maybe some nut will take a shot at her. That's what they want, isn't it?

Maybe someone ought to mutilate Michelle Malkin, since she supports this war so much. After all, she's the one who thinks she knows what Casey Sheehan thinks from the Great Beyond.
Bookmark and Share

Today's new vocabulary word is "Plame" (verb)
Posted by Jill | 2:50 PM

PLAME. (v.) to publicly denigrate of an individual opposed to Administration policy, followed by a call to the usual suspects in the wingnut media to beat the person to death metaphorically, then spit on the corpse; i.e. "She was opposed to the war, so they plamed her."

Now it's Cindy Sheehan's turn:

A few weeks ago, David Frum -- the neo-con author of the “axis of evil” doctrine -- had the audacity to call Cindy Sheehan an “anti-war crazy.” The neo-cons are good at that sort of thing. When they come up against compelling arguments for which they have no canned retort, they never hesitate to go for the jugulars. As Ambassador Joseph Wilson or Hans Blix can attest, they have a nasty habit of viciously Plaming dissenters to teach them the proper etiquette for addressing impertinent questions to our White House governors.

Within 48 hours after Cindy marched on Bush’s Texas ranch, the long knives were being sharpened. Instead of answering her questions, the Rove squads made the decision to give her the “Valerie Plame” treatment. Plaming is a two-step process -- first you denigrate the offending serf in the public square. You then call in the mass media muscle guys to dump the remains some place where the victim can safely be ignored. In keeping with the game plan, CNN and FOX are back filming the endless soap opera in Aruba and monitoring shark attacks and Tsunamis. If only they could spare that kind of coverage for Cindy Sheehan -- George Bush would be permanently retired in Crawford and the neo-con brigades would be sharing bunks in a federal penitentiary.

[snip]

George can’t spare the time to discuss the war with Cindy because they both know the questions and they both know the answers. He doesn’t want to talk about it and Cindy wants the whole country in on the conversation.

The loss of a child is traumatic enough for any mother. But Cindy Sheehan has to deal with the additional burden of knowing that her son might still be alive if Bush had made different policy decisions. Driven by the weight of that burden, she is now on a mission to prevent the Pentagon from wasting another mother’s child in the deserts of Mesopotamia. To the everlasting gratitude of tens of thousands of Iraqi mothers, Cindy also insists on holding the President responsible for the many innocent Iraqis who have perished as a result of his decision to invade and occupy a country that posed no threat to American national security.
Bookmark and Share

The story behind the July job numbers
Posted by Jill | 11:28 AM

The Bush moonies have been trumpeting the 207,000 new jobs created in July as some kind of marker of a resurgent economy.

But let's look at little closer at the kinds of jobs that were created, shall we?

Actually, we don't have to, for Paul Craig Roberts has done it for us:

Of the new jobs, 26,000 (about 13%) are tax-supported government jobs. That leaves 181,000 private sector jobs. Of these private sector jobs, 177,000, or 98%, are in the domestic service sector.

Here is the breakdown of the major categories:

• 30,000 food servers and bar tenders;
• 28,000 health care and social assistance:
• 12,000 real estate;
• 6,000 credit intermediation;
• 8,000 transit and ground passenger transportation;
• 50,000 retail trade; and
• 8,000 wholesale trade.
(There were 7,000 construction jobs, most of which were filled by Mexicans immigrants.)

Not a single one of these jobs produces a tradable good or service that can be exported or serve as an import substitute to help reduce the massive and growing US trade deficit. The US economy is employing people to sell things, to move people around, and to serve them fast food and alcoholic beverages. The items may have an American brand name, but they are mainly made off shore. For example, 70% of Wal-Mart’s goods are made in China.


My question is, what happens when no one is making enough money to even buy fast food and Wal-Mart crap? The fact of the matter is that the American job market is in a race to the bottom. Remember all those high-paying, high-tech jobs of the future? Gone...replaced by low-paying jobs, many of them without benefits and most of them without security.

I keep thinking about Jamaica, a country I've visited many times in which most of the so-called "good jobs" are service jobs in the tourism industry. People in these jobs are lucky to make $65/week, and many of them live in fear of being fired for transgressions ranging from fraternizing with the guests to accepting tips (which is a firing offense at many of the large, all-inclusive resorts.

Then I look at where the job market is headed here, the only bright spot is in another 10 years, American young people won't need to pay the $400,000 that college will cost by then, because the only jobs available won't require a degree.
Bookmark and Share

Here's the next guy the wingnuts are going to swiftboat
Posted by Jill | 10:50 AM

Terry Rodgers:

The Humvee finally comes to a stop and the right side is just torn apart and I hear my squad leader screaming, 'I think I lost my arm!' And my best friend Maida was in the front passenger seat where the bomb went off and he was screaming, 'Where's help? Where's help?' And then he went quiet.

"And me, I'm trying to crawl out of the Humvee and I get most of my body out and just this leg is stuck and I thought it must be caught on something in the twisted metal. I look back and I see it's just laying there on the seat, so I'm like, 'Why is it stuck?' So I try to lift my leg up and it won't lift. I just had to pick up my leg and crawl the rest of the way out."

He mimes the action of picking up his leg with his hands, then he continues the story.

"I started patting myself down and that's when I noticed that my face took some shrapnel," he says. "It was all swollen on this side, so when I'm patting myself down, my middle finger went, like, this deep into my cheek where the shrapnel went in."

He points to a spot about halfway down his finger, showing how far it went into the shrapnel wound behind his right eye, which is still pretty much blind, unable to see anything but bright light.

[snip]

"The two trucks behind us had to stop and make sure the area was secure before they could help us," he says. "And the first guys that showed up saw Maida in the front seat, leaning against the windshield and all I heard was, 'Sir, we lost Maida.'

"And then they helped my squad leader, who lost his right arm, and then they came over and helped me. They bandaged us up . . . and when the helicopter finally showed up, they loaded me and Maida into the chopper and flew us to Baghdad.

"And after that, I don't remember anything till like a week after I got to Walter Reed."
[snip]

Terry Rodgers, who just turned 21, grew up in Rockville, son of a carpenter and a courthouse clerk. After graduating from Richard Montgomery High School in 2002, he worked as a mechanic in a Washington gas station, then joined the Army.

"It was something I always wanted to do," he says. "I thought it looked fun. I just wanted to get out on my own for a while. I got kind of bored being around here. I wanted to try something new."

He signed up in October 2002, but he didn't go into the Army until the following July. In between, the United States invaded Iraq, but Rodgers didn't pay much attention to that.

"I didn't have a political view," he says. "I'm not into politics."

[snip]

His real injuries were almost as bad as the ones he hallucinated. He had a broken femur, broken jaw, broken cheekbone. His right calf was blown away. Also, his right ear couldn't hear and his right eye couldn't see.

He spent a month and a half at Walter Reed. The doctors wired his jaw shut, put a metal rod in his leg, did nine hours of surgery on his eye, reconstructed his calf, and did skin grafts.

"I've had way too many surgeries to count," he says.

[snip]

One day a nurse came in to ask Rodgers if he wanted to meet President Bush, who was visiting the hospital. Rodgers declined.

"I don't want anything to do with him," he explains. "My belief is that his ego is getting people killed and mutilated for no reason -- just his ego and his reputation. If we really wanted to, we could pull out of Iraq. Maybe not completely but enough that we wouldn't be losing people -- at least not at this rate. So I think he himself is responsible for quite a few American deaths."

Bill Swisher, a spokesman for Walter Reed, says it's "fairly common" for patients to decline to see visitors. "We've had visitors from Sheryl Crow to Hulk Hogan," he says, but he has no idea how many have refused to see Bush, who has visited the hospital eight times.

Rodgers says he also declined to meet Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice. This wounded soldier has lost faith in his leaders, and he no longer believes their repeated assurances of victory.

"It's gonna go on as long as we're there," he says. "There's always gonna be insurgents trying to blow us up. There's just too many of 'em that are willing to do it. You're never gonna catch all of 'em. And it seems like they have unlimited amounts of ammunition. So I don't think it's ever gonna end."


Here's a good, stolid, patriotic American, just another kid who didn't know what he wanted to do, so he went into the military -- and got one hell of a wakeup call.

More and more soldiers are coming back with stories like this, and fewer of them are inclined to delude themselves about what they experienced -- unlike the College Republicans, the 101st Fighting Keyboarders, and the ass-pimpled Rush Limbaugh, who insist that they know more about what's really going on in Iraq than the people who are serving there.

There's going to come a time when the chickenhawk will no longer be able to tune out these voices, and there's going to come a time when the Chickenhawk-in-Chief isn't going to arrest everybody who interferes with his delusions.
Bookmark and Share

Disgusting
Posted by Jill | 6:54 AM

The Bush Junta is planning to pull out all the stops this 9/11 in order to milk the attacks one mo' time in a feeble, craven, and hopefully ineffective attempt to gain cheap political points over the bodies of the dead:

The Pentagon would hold a massive march and country music concert to mark the fourth anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks, US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said in an announcement tucked into an Iraq war briefing today.

"This year the Department of Defence will initiate an America Supports Your Freedom Walk," Rumsfeld said, adding that the march would remind people of "the sacrifices of this generation and of each previous generation".

The march will start at the Pentagon, where nearly 200 people died on September 11, 2001, and end at the National Mall with a show by country star Clint Black.

Word of the event startled some observers.

"I've never heard of such a thing," said John Pike, who has been a defence analyst in Washington for 25 years and runs GlobalSecurity.org.

The news also reignited debate and anger over linking September 11 with the war in Iraq.

"That piece of it is disturbing since we all know now there was no connection," said Paul Rieckhoff, an Iraq veteran who heads Operation Truth, an anti-administration military booster.

Rieckhoff suggested the event was an ill-conceived publicity stunt.

"I think it's clear that their public opinion polls are in the toilet," he said.

Rumsfeld's march had some relatives of September 11 victims fuming.

"How about telling Mr Rumsfeld to leave the memories of September 11 victims to the families?" said Monica Gabrielle, who lost her husband in the attacks.

Administration supporters insisted Rumsfeld was right to link Iraq and September 11, and hold the rally.

"We are at war," said Representative Pete King, (Republican, New York).

"It's essential that we support our troops."

He also said attacking Iraq was necessary after September 11.

"You do not defeat al-Qaeda until you stabilise the Middle East, and that's not possible as long as Saddam Hussein is in power."


Good Lord, where do I even begin? Do I start with "Nothin' says Amurrica like guys singin' through their noses to celebrate dramatic mass death on national television"? Clint Black??? What, was Toby Keith unavailable Or do I start with the subtle, but unmistakable linking of 9/11 with the Iraq war -- at the same time as Bush's mindless grinning bulldog supporters continue insist that no connection was ever made? Or do I start with Peter King's ridiculous comments about how the Middle East can't be stabilized with Saddam Hussein in power, conveniently ignoring how Iraq is in a state of total anarchy and is breeding terrorists like rabbits?

All that's missing is George W. Bush landing in a helicopter in a flightsuit carrying a giant dildo. But I shouldn't say that. It might give them ideas.
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Note to DLC:
Posted by Jill | 11:47 AM

THIS is the kind of Democrat we want. Not Holy Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton's Crusade Against Indecency. Not Joe Biden's fellation of the credit card industry and Alberto Gonzales ("I like you. You're the real deal.") But someone like Paul Hackett, who tells it like it is, and isn't afraid to puncture the gasbags of the right.
Bookmark and Share

Waiting to Exhale
Posted by Jill | 10:04 AM

All together now:

Wwwwhhhhhooooosssshhhhh.

Ah. Much better:

The space shuttle Discovery glided back to Earth to a pre-dawn landing here in the Mojave desert today, nearly 14 days after its 5.8-million-mile journey began.

The shuttle began the end of its mission at 7:06 by firing its engines over the Indian Ocean for more than two minutes in what is known as a de-orbit burn. About 30 minutes later, at an altitude of 76 miles, the shuttle entered the atmosphere at a maximum speed of more than 16,000 miles per hour, guided at first by its steering jets and later, as the atmosphere became thicker, by its wing flaps and rudder.

During the computer-controlled descent, Discovery bled off excess energy and reduced its speed by performing a series of four banks. The shuttle streaked across the California coast from the southwest and flew north of Los Angeles on a course that took it between Oxnard and Ventura. A characteristic double sonic boom could be heard over Edwards as the craft passed overhead.

Once Discovery's velocity dropped below the speed of sound, Colonel Collins took over the controls and brought the spacecraft - now, essentially, a brick with wings - in for its approach. She executed a 196-degree turn to line up with Edwards' 15,000-foot concrete runway 2-2. Main gear touched down and the parachute was deployed; the nose gear touched down immediately after, at 8:11 a.m. Eastern time, one minute ahead of schedule.

"Discovery is home," said James Hartsfield, the NASA spokesman narrating the return.


Now would NASA please get its shit together?
Bookmark and Share

"My Doorbell"
Posted by Jill | 9:47 AM

I'm the first one to admit that I'm not much up on what's current in music. The last time I latched on to a "current" band was the Dave Matthews Band, and that's 12 years ago already. The last "newish" CD that came into my possession was Green Day's "American Idiot", thanks to Tami, who doesn't find it all ridiculous that a 50-year-old should like Green Day.

Most of what I listen to these days is blues, old reggae, some old swing, acoustic-era music, and the old warhorses of jamming -- DMB, The Allman Bros. Band, that sort of thing; and early Elvis Costello before he became happy and mellowed out.

But by some miracle, a decent music station that doesn't skew so much towards singer/songwriters (which is my only beef with WFUV, the Fordham University station at 90.7 FM) has popped up in the New York Metro area. I have no idea what the call letters are, but the station is known as "The Peek", it's at 107.1, and operates out of someplace in Westchester. It's such a miracle to have a music station that you can just leave on and be 90% assured that it'll play something you can stand to listen to and NOT have to hear Stairway to Heaven for the four millionth time. Because I don't know about you, but most of what's played on "Classic Rock" radio is stuff I would rather have root canal without anesthesia than listen to again.

But this one song by the White Stripes, "My Doorbell", is in heavy rotation on this station. It sounds amateurish, poorly engineered, and I find it not just catchy as hell, but oddly compelling. Is it just me?
Bookmark and Share

Cindy Sheehan talks back
Posted by Jill | 6:44 AM

I'm taking the liberty of re-posting excerpts from Cindy Sheehan's Day 3 update from Crawford (emphases mine):

I conservatively got 3 to 5 phone calls a minute. I did about 25 phone interviews and several TV interviews. I did several right-wing radio interviews. I was supposed to do: The Today Show, MSNBC live interview, Connected Coast to Coast (MSNBC) and Hardball (MSNBC). The Today Show just never showed up and the other 3 MSNBC shows cancelled for no reason. Could it be because NBC is owned by General Electric, a major defense contractor??

Another big story that was going on today was about my first meeting with Bush in June of 2004. For you all I would like to clarify a few things. First of all, I did meet with George, and that is not a secret. I have written about it and been interviewed about it. I will stand by my recounting of the meeting. His behavior was rude and inappropriate. My behavior in June of 2004 and is irrelevant to what is going on in 2005.

[snip]

The VERY LAST THING I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS IS: Why do the right wing media so assiduously scrutinize the words of a grief filled mother and ignore the words of a lying president?


Amen to that. More:

the early afternoon, we got word that if we were still there by Thursday, we were going to be deemed a "security threat" to the president. Condi and Rummy are coning in on Thursday for a "policy" meeting. Don't they mean conspiracy to commit crimes meeting? I just don't understand why we will be a security threat on Thursday when we aren't now? If we don't leave on Thursday, we will be arrested. Well, I am not leaving. There are only three things that would make me leave: if George comes out and talks to me; if August comes to an end, or if I am arrested.

[snip]

People are heading here from all over the country. I have some more Gold Star Families for Peace members coming tomorrow. We are amazed by the outpouring of love and support we are getting. If you can come, then come.


Gotta love it. She is one tough tomato. This is the Bush Administration's worst nightmare made flesh. I can't believe they're still living in enough of a bubble that they don't realize that arresting a bereaved war mom on national television is not going to exactly help their image. More:

Today was so bizarre for me. I got phone calls from famous people pledging their support, and phone calls from mothers with sons in Iraq who are overcome with emotion when they talk to me. And it is so brave for them to call me, because I am their worst fear. We had a young man who is in the US Army at Ft. Hood come this morning and spend hours with us. He has been there and his unit is scheduled to go back in October. How much courage did that take for him to come within earshot of his commander in chief's home and spend time with some old hippy protestors???


And this is where today's antiwar movement differs from that of the Vietnam era. Back then, the movement was spearheaded by kids with deferments, often rebelling against their WWII-generation parents, who couldn't fathom the idea that our government would get us into an unjust war. It even differs from the movement that marched in New York City over three years ago. Today's movement is being hatched at kitchen tables all across America, and it's not being hatched by A.N.S.W.E.R activists. Instead it's being hatched by bereaved war moms, veterans of THIS WAR, men and women with sons in their teens who are pro-military, support our troops, but who don't want to see anyone else's son come back in a box. Cindy Sheehan, a mom from a Republican stronghold, is the face of today's antiwar movement, and she's a tough face to demonize....though God knows they're trying to.

What's surprising is that the MSM didn't wait six weeks, as they did with the Downing Street Minutes, to start covering Sheehan's vigil. Perhaps those 45% approval ratings and the polls showing that a majority of Americans think Bush is a liar have something to do with it.

The New York Times has an editorial about Sheehan today. It's a good piece, which also notes the appalling lack of sacrifice Americans without loved ones in the military are being asked to make. But even the Times has to make a snarky remark that Sheehan also makes a convenient "media figure", alluding to a summer in which there are no recent developments in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and no recent shark attacks.

All Bush has to do is go out there for five minutes. Remember, Bush had time to hobnob with porn star Mary Carey at a Republican fundraiser. Bush had time to fly back to D.C. to sign legislation injecting the government into the Schiavo case. Bush had time to answer softball questions from a hooker in the White House press room. But he hasn't had time to attend any military funerals, and he doesn't have five minutes to spend with the mother of one of the soldiers he sent off to his death?

UPDATE: The Lone Star Iconoclast is posting updates daily.
Bookmark and Share
Monday, August 08, 2005

Wingnut oppo on a bereaved war mom
Posted by Jill | 5:03 PM

First we had Drudge taking Cindy Sheehan out of context as a means of smearing her credibility as she continues her vigil in Crawford, Texas. Now we have an even lower breed of pond scum deciding that he knows more about what a perfect stranger, someone he never met, would think than his own mother does.

Imagine a political apparatus that feels it has to do opposition research on a woman who lost her son in a war. I mean, just how low and chickenshit can you get?

All Bush has to do is go out and talk to Cindy Sheehan, tell her what this "noble cause" is that her son died in -- and not just more platitudes; tell her something real.

What's the worst that will happen, she'll yell at him? She's not stupid, and she's not crazy. She's not going to take a swing at him, and even if she did, he'll be surrounded by Secret Service. Instead, the chickenshit little punk is cowering behind the fences, afraid of a mom from the Republican enclave of Vacaville, California.

THAT's your commander-in-chief, folks -- a man too cowardly to face one woman's questions. A man so terrified of the truth that he's going to brand her a national security threat and have her arrested -- when Osama Bin Laden still runs free.

That's your president.

UPDATE: Hoffmania has a response to Newman's smear of Cindy Sheehan from a reader who's veteran of this war.
Bookmark and Share

Creeping fascism
Posted by Jill | 2:33 PM

NOW can we start calling the Bush regime a "Reich"?

Cindy Sheehan phoned me from Texas a few minutes ago to say that she's been informed that beginning Thursday, she and her companions will be considered a threat to national security and will be arrested. Coincidentally, Thursday is the day that Rice and Rumsfeld visit the ranch, and Friday is a fundraiser event for the haves and the have mores. Cindy said that she and others plan to be arrested.


Notice how Cindy Sheehan isn't being arrested for trespassing, or for any kind of disorderly conduct. She's being arrested because in wanting answers from the President of the United States, who works FOR HER and FOR ALL OF US, she's considered a threat to national security.

It gets more terrifying every day.
Bookmark and Share

Dealing with the deaths of our imaginary friends (SFU spoiler warning!)
Posted by Jill | 6:41 AM

A few months ago I posted about what seemed to be evolving into a pen-and-ink violation of the Turner and Hooch rule in the comic strip "Sally Forth", in which the situation was "$3400 of surgery or your cat dies.

Right now, television watchers and newspaper comic readers are dealing with the dual excruciating crises of Nate Fisher's death on Six Feet Under and potentially cruel fallout from Wally Winkerbean's ill-conceived Honeymoon in Afghanistan.

I don't know about you, but I'm not sure I can take much more of this.

Six Feet Under has seemed of late, particularly last season, as if it had devolved into NOTHING but a soap, its particular brand of screwy, snarky moralism lost in the crises of the various characters that make up Casa la Fisher. But while the series has been difficult to watch this season and often almost intolerably depressing, the last three episodes have been oddly cathartic at the same time. I don't know about any of you, but watching last night's episode felt like being drawn into the television set itself, into the maelstrom of Fisher family drama. Nate Fisher had become such a Peter Pan immature asshole this season it was hard to mourn his death, and yet the imagery of Peter Krause diving into the Pacific Ocean to the strains of Strawberry Letter 23 (23? Discordians, please take note) while "Stoner David" watches, have lodged in my head for the last week.

This week's episode, dealing with the funeral and immediate impact of an unexpected death on a family we've come to know, just ripped apart these characters and let their pain out for us all to see. Say what you will about what's happened to this series lately, there's no denying that you've seen some of the most powerful performances you'll see out of any actors this year. It's not often that an actor is able to pull the viewer inside the character's skin, so you're not just seeing the character, but actually becoming the character -- Diane Lane is an example of one who always can -- but what was so exhausting and subliminally disturbing about this week's episode is how Frances Conroy, Michael C. Hall, Lauren Ambrose, and Rachel Griffiths ALL managed to do that. So if you watched last night, you probably tossed and turned all night the way I did, and are probably just as tired.

The good news is that there are only two more episodes of this, for which I'm truly thankful, though I'm going to miss the Fishers when they're gone. I'm especially going to miss seeing Keith and David thumb their noses at Rick Santorum by doing a great job turning that punk Durell and his adorable brother into Fine Upstanding Citizens.

But if the emotional wringer that is Six Feet Under is almost over, it looks like the emotional wringer that is Funky Winkerbean could go on for another week. For those not familiar with this strip, Wally Winkerbean is the title character's brother. Wally was thought to have been killed in the first Gulf War, but was later found, came home, married his one-armed sweetheart Becky, and the two went off on a honeymoon to Afghanistan, where Wally wanted to go to find and disarm land mines. Well, you can kind of write the rest of this one for yourself, but strip creator Tom Batiuk has spent the last four days presenting Wally wanting to take "one last picture", showing his heel perched dangerously close to what looks ominously like a mine, and finally with a "ta-chink", stepping on the mine itself. In today's strip, Batiuk is essentially rehashing yesterday's Sunday strip, which could go on for another three days.

I don't know about you, but again -- I can't handle much more of this.

I'm not sure why fictional characters on television shows and even more oddly, comic strip characters, seem so real to us, especially when dealing with Great Cosmic Hoo-Hah issues such as death. I suppose that it gives us a kind of "dry run" for dealing with our own demise, a way to try to safely wrap our minds around our own nonexistence by seeing the reactions of those around those characters to theirs.

Which of course brings us to the death of Peter Jennings yesterday at the age of 67. For nothing exemplifies the person we think we know like a news anchor. For millions of Americans, Peter Jennings was their dinner guest every night for over twenty years. The first of the "pretty-boy anchors", Jennings over time proved to be more than a pretty face. He never went to college, but projected a calm authority as he covered tragedies from the 1972 Olympics massacre to the 9/11 attacks. What I always liked about Jennings was that for all that he was deadly serious in front of the camera, he seemed to realize the utter ridiculousness of a guy reading a teleprompter having gravitas and authority. If you ever saw any of the guest segments he did on The Daily Show, you know he was well aware of the absurdity of what he did for a living.

Today, news readers seem to come out of modeling agencies, and the Fox News-ification of news seems to make the intelligence that a Peter Jennings could project a thing of the past. While Jennings wasn't an American institution the way, say, Harry Reasoner or David Brinkely were, his passing seems to be yet another nail in the coffin of television news.
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 07, 2005

I thought wingnuts were opposed to frivolous lawsuits
Posted by Jill | 11:34 PM

I swear, you can't make this stuff up:

A national anti-abortion group yesterday served the administrators of California's stem cell institute with a federal lawsuit seeking to stop their work on the grounds that the civil rights of frozen embryos are violated by stem cell research.
The lawsuit was delivered during a a monthly meeting of the institute's oversight committee at the University of California San Diego. Around the same time it arrived, committee Chairman Robert Klein was announcing that several lawsuits filed in state court had been consolidated to be heard by one judge, in one county, on an expedited basis.

That litigation has blocked the sale of government-backed bonds to fund the institute, which is supposed to award $300 million annually for stem cell research.

The federal lawsuit, filed by the National Association for the Advancement of Preborn Children, could now further delay the sale of bonds.


Atrios is absolutely right:

If I were a cranky liberal lawyer with a lot of time and money on my hands I'd be inspired by this story to file suit against every IVF clinic in the country. It's true that some in the fetus fetish crowd are very quietly opposed to IVF treatments, but as is the case with divorce too many in their flock have had or would certainly pursue the option if necessary so they tend not to say all that much about it.


(hat tip: Pandagon)

Where IS the outrage against IVF clinics, anyway? These people have absolutely no moral high ground on which to stand. A few weeks ago, Garry Trudeau penned a Doonesbury cartoon in which George W. Bush lay awake at night hearing the cries of stem cells. That was a cartoon, but these people aren't all that far removed from this kind of lunacy.

I'm amazed that any self-respecting Republican who still has a shred of sanity is still willing to support a president whose mindset on stem cell research is no different from these nutballs.
Bookmark and Share

Black sheep my ass
Posted by Jill | 2:29 PM

I liked it better when my thoughts about 9/11 made me a crazy person.

But the more time that elapses between 9/11 and the present, and the more we see how the Bush Administration's so-called anti-terrorism is playing out (and doing little to address the problem of terrorism, but a whole lot to plow cash into Dick Cheney's pockets and a whole lot to make Americans less free), the less crazy I seem.

The accepted meme has always been that Osama Bin Laden is the "black sheep" of the Bin Laden family that has been in business with the Bush family for years. This has been a convenient way of separating out the alleged mastermind of the 9/11 attacks from the rest of his clan, who are up to their tits in shady oil and other business dealings with Poppy Bush through the Carlyle Group and other companies.

It's always seemed odd that our military has been so stymied by a 6-foot-plus Arabic guy in kidney failure. Could it be that Osama Bin Laden is more valuable to the Bush Junta as an ever-present boogeyman than he would be as a corpse -- or even a captive?

Yup, it sure can be, and it seems that it is -- either that or this Administration is so fucking inept it shouldn't be trusted to fight terrorists:

in a forthcoming book, the CIA field commander for the agency's Jawbreaker team at Tora Bora, Gary Berntsen, says he and other U.S. commanders did know that bin Laden was among the hundreds of fleeing Qaeda and Taliban members. Berntsen says he had definitive intelligence that bin Laden was holed up at Tora Bora—intelligence operatives had tracked him—and could have been caught. "He was there," Berntsen tells NEWSWEEK. Asked to comment on Berntsen's remarks, National Security Council spokesman Frederick Jones passed on 2004 statements from former CENTCOM commander Gen. Tommy Franks. "We don't know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden was at Tora Bora in December 2001," Franks wrote in an Oct. 19 New York Times op-ed. "Bin Laden was never within our grasp." Berntsen says Franks is "a great American. But he was not on the ground out there. I was."

In his book—titled "Jawbreaker"—the decorated career CIA officer criticizes Donald Rumsfeld's Defense Department for not providing enough support to the CIA and the Pentagon's own Special Forces teams in the final hours of Tora Bora, says Berntsen's lawyer, Roy Krieger. (Berntsen would not divulge the book's specifics, saying he's awaiting CIA clearance.) That backs up other recent accounts, including that of military author Sean Naylor, who calls Tora Bora a "strategic disaster" because the Pentagon refused to deploy a cordon of conventional forces to cut off escaping Qaeda and Taliban members. Maj. Todd Vician, a Defense Department spokesman, says the problem at Tora Bora "was not necessarily just the number of troops."

Bookmark and Share

Operation Get Shitfaced For the Troops
Posted by Jill | 10:00 AM

Take a look how those brave College Republicans -- you know, the ones who support the war and claim to support the troops, but have done absolutely nothing for them -- show their patriotism.

But why not? They're just emulating their Lord and Master and Messiah in the White House.
Bookmark and Share

BREAKING: The Clenis® Gave Steroids to Rafael Palmeiro
Posted by Jill | 8:26 AM

Actually, it's getting to be fun finding out what the wingnuts are blaming Clinton for now:

In the 1990s, we called this "compartmentalizing." It was approved by journalists and public figures alike. President Bill Clinton executed his presidential tasks exuberantly day in and day out while retaining subpoenaed documents from prosecutors, coaching witnesses to deceive and lying brazenly to his staff and the public. He compartmentalized, and to this day, there are public figures who admire his sang-froid. They would agree with John Harris' assessment of him in Harris' recent encomium, "The Survivor," as being one of "the two most important political figures of their generation" -- the other being, who else, Hillary.

One of Clinton's most memorable statements that will ring down from the Decade of Illusions is: "I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again. I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." The Boy President said that glaring into the cameras on national television and pointing his finger for emphasis. Later he failed his drug test or rather his DNA test. Yet he is still arguing that the statement is somehow true.

Palmeiro is one of Clinton's finest students. Under oath before a Congressional Committee on March 17, he declared: "I have never used steroids. Period. I do not know how to say it more clearly than that. Never." He too glared and pointed his finger emphatically. Now that he is suspended after that failed test, he argues with Clintonian indefatigability: "I have never intentionally used steroids. Never. Ever. Period." The New York Times reports that the steroid he tested positive for is stanozolol. It is unimaginable that an adult would not know that he was taking it. Use of it in 1988 cost Canadian sprinter Ben Johnson his Olympic gold medal.


Funny how "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" doesn't count as a lie in Tyrrell's world. Funny also how Bush's denial that Palmiero could possibly have used steroids because he's a persona friend isn't mentioned. But that's how things are on Planet Delusional....Satan is represented not by a red guy with horns and a cape, but instead by an effigy of a giant phallus with "Bill Clinton" written on it in crayon.

(hat tip: ThinkProgress)

UPDATE: John at Blogenlust should give himself a pat on the back, because this is further proof of "Blogenlust's Law":

As an online discussion among wingnuts grows longer, the probability that a Clinton will be blamed for something approaches 1 (i.e., certainty).
Bookmark and Share

I'll give 'em this much: They're shrewd
Posted by Jill | 8:13 AM

The Bush Administration is loath to repeat Richard Nixon's "Saturday Night Massacre" by firing special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald outright. Those of us who were around in those days remember that this act pretty much sealed the deal that Nixon had something to hide.

But the Bush Junta is nothing if not shrewd. They're not going to fire Fitzgerald; they're just going to cut off his investigation at the knees by installing a Bush crony as his boss:

The departure this week of Deputy Attorney General James Comey, who has accepted the post of general counsel at Lockheed Martin, leaves a question mark in the probe into who leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame. Comey was the only official overseeing special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's leak investigation. With Attorney General Alberto Gonzales recused, department officials say they are still trying to resolve whom Fitzgerald will now report to. Associate Attorney General Robert McCallum is "likely" to be named as acting deputy A.G., a DOJ official who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter tells NEWSWEEK. But McCallum may be seen as having his own conflicts: he is an old friend of President Bush's and a member of his Skull and Bones class at Yale. One question: how much authority Comey's successor will have over Fitzgerald. When Comey appointed Fitzgerald in 2003, the deputy granted him extraordinary powers to act however he saw fit—but noted he still had the right to revoke Fitzgerald's authority. The questions are pertinent because law-yers close to the case believe the probe is in its final stages. Fitzgerald recently called White House aide Karl Rove's secretary and his former top aide to testify before the grand jury. They were asked why there was no record of a phone call from Time reporter Matt Cooper, with whom Rove discussed the CIA agent, says a source close to Rove who requested anonymity because the FBI asked participants not to comment. The source says the call went through the White House switchboard, not directly to Rove.


Does anyone honestly believe that an old friend of Bush's is going to let this inevestigation continue? And if he does, does anyone actually believe that the truth is going to be what's important here?

But this is the story of George W. Bush's life, isn't it? He wrecks everything he touches, and then relies on family connections and cronies to bail him out.

And the morons continue to defend him.
Bookmark and Share

This is what "You're either with us or you're against us" leads to
Posted by Jill | 8:09 AM

Wingnuts at Frei Republik and other sites have been throwing around words like "sedition" and "traitorous" to describe everyone who isn't marching in lockstep with the Bush Administration.

Here's what such black-and-white thinking leads to:

A quarrel between two firearms vendors at a Floyd County flea market on Thursday allegedly led both men -- described as "good friends" -- to draw guns. Douglas Moore, 65, of Martin, who supports the war, shot and killed Harold Wayne Smith, 56, of Manchester, who opposed it, investigators said.

Moore was questioned at the Floyd County Jail, but he was released without being charged after Kentucky State Police said it appears he acted in self-defense.

Evidence in the case will be presented to a Floyd County grand jury, said Commonwealth's Attorney Brent Turner, who said the episode might mark the first death in the United States resulting from a dispute over the war.

Both Smith and Moore maintained gun-trading tables at the Bull Creek Trade Center near Prestonsburg, and witnesses said they began arguing over the war early Thursday morning.

One witness, Sam Hamman of Prestonsburg, told The Floyd County Times that the two men always carried guns and bickered frequently about the quality of guns, knives and the war.

"Harold was talking about the 14 people that were killed in Iraq the other day and Doug said that just as many people were killed on the highways here," Hamman told the paper.

Another witness, Chuck Newsome, said yesterday the Sept. 11 attacks also were included in the argument, which quickly escalated into an altercation and then to a kind of showdown in front of the market's snack stand.

After a scuffle, Newsome said he saw Smith stand beside the snack shed, pull a small pistol out of his pocket, cock the hammer and say, "I'm going to blow your ... brains out."

Witnesses said Moore pulled a .38-caliber pistol from his pocket.

"Doug was just quicker," Harold Hannah of Salyersville said.


So that's what you get when you combine simplistic thinking with easy access to guns. Heartland values indeed.
Bookmark and Share