"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, December 04, 2004

A wingnut finally 'fesses up...
Posted by Jill | 7:26 AM
...as to the real reason for the outrage over the infamous Nicolete Sheridan/Terrell Owens Monday Night Football ad.

As you no doubt suspected, it's that old miscegenation / protect our white wimmen against the oversexed, overendowed Negro (sic) male / insatiable evil immoral temptress daughter of Eve fears of conservative white men -- all rolled up into one short but to the point piece of tape.

Samuel Francis, VDARE.com:

In the aftermath of the similar reaction to CBS’s showing of the Janet Jackson-Justin Timberlake flap during the Super Bowl last February, there can be little doubt the ABC ad was not just a blunder.

It was an intentional act of moral subversion.

[snip]

Like the Jackson-Timberlake performance, the Owens-Sheridan ad was interracial and brazenly so—if only morals and taste had been the targets, the producers could easily have found white actresses who are less obviously Nordic than the golden-locked Miss Sheridan, but Nordic is what the ad’s producers no doubt wanted.

For that matter, if you only wanted to take a swipe at morals and taste, you could find a black woman to rip her towel off or replace Mr. Owens with a famous white athlete (there are still a few).

But that wasn’t the point, was it? The point was not just to hurl a pie in the face of morals and good taste but also of white racial and cultural identity. The message of the ad was that white women are eager to have sex with black men, that they should be eager, and that black men should take them up on it.

So far only one voice has mentioned the ad’s racial meaning and denounced its “insensitivity“ (to blacks)—that of black Indianapolis Colts coach Tony Dungy.

Blacks are permitted to notice race. Whites aren’t.

But the ad’s message also was that interracial sex is normal and legitimate, a fairly radical concept for both the dominant media as well as its audience.

Nevertheless, for decades, interracial couples of different sexes have been sneaked into advertising, movies and television series, and almost certainly not because of popular demand from either race. The Owens-Sheridan match is only the most notorious to date.

In the minds of those who produced the ad, race is at least as important as the moral and aesthetic norms their ad subverts.

To them, the race as well as the religion, the morality, and the culture of the host society are all equally hostile and oppressive forces that need to be discredited, debunked and destroyed.

If the destruction can’t happen at the polls or through the courts, they can always use the long march through the culture that control of the mass media allows.

Breaking down the sexual barriers between the races is a major weapon of cultural destruction because it means the dissolution of the cultural boundaries that define breeding and the family and, ultimately, the transmission and survival of the culture itself.

It was filmed the Friday before, and in the aftermath of all the jabber about “moral issues“ in the election, it ought to be transparent that it was intended as an act of political-cultural subversion as well.


And if you think that's bad, go read the comments at the end of the article. They'll make your head explode.

Now, I'm all in favor of stuff like this getting out. "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out," as Robert Graves wrote Emperor Claudius saying. It may no longer be fashionable for people to talk like this, but articles like this one demonstrate dramatically that for many people, race issues haven't progressed one iota.

(via Atrios)
Bookmark and Share
Friday, December 03, 2004

So what are the new new NEW jobs of the 21st century?
Posted by Jill | 6:01 PM

Remember when education in technology was supposed to be the key to a bright career future in America? Not anymore:

In an eyebrow-raising forecast, Gartner Inc. researchers said they believe that as many as 50 percent of the IT operational jobs in the U.S. could disappear over the next two decades because of improvements in data center technologies.

Donna Scott, a Gartner analyst, said IT workers face a situation similar to that in the manufacturing field, which has lost jobs over the past several decades as automation has improved. Similarly, standardization of IT infrastructure, applications and processes will lead to productivity improvements and a major shift in skill needs, she said.

"There will be more room to automate, and that means there will be reduced labor cost," said Scott. "This is a long-term change."

Gartner calls this change "real-time infrastructure," which involves service-oriented architectures, the elimination of communications barriers and dynamic alignment of IT with business priorities. Technologies enabling the shift have less need for human intervention because they are more intelligent and can automatically provision services and self-heal.

IT operations, which encompass areas such as systems administration, incident response and change management, today account for about 55 percent of an IT department's labor cost, said Scott, who spoke at the Stamford, Conn.-based research firm's annual data center conference here in Las Vegas. But as companies improve automation, IT operations become "more like a factory," said Scott. Demand will grow for employees who have IT architecture skills as well as those with business and customer-liaison knowledge. Project management, for instance, will rise in terms of the percentage of IT labor costs, she said.


Not so long ago, system administration was regarded as a safeguard against outsourcing. Everyone knew that the programming jobs were being shipped overseas, but if you were a hands-on guy -- network administration, help desk, that sort of thing -- you were safe. So much for that delusion.

So where are the high-paying jobs of the 21st century going to come from? Alternative energy research? No, the Bush Administration wants nothing to do with that, it might interfere with their oil money. Stem cell research? No, that kills blastocysts. Geology? No, that might produce evidence that the Biblical account of creation can't possibly be true. AIDS research? No, after all, we want those sinners and fornicators to die, right?

No, folks, we are headed down the road to third world-dom, where global corporations will pit populations of workers in various countries against each other in an ever-increasing race to the bottom.

I enjoyed my stay in the middle class. I hope you did too.
Bookmark and Share

I say it's bullying, and I say to hell with it
Posted by Jill | 2:50 PM

More on the Saga of Ken Jennings. As speculation swirled regularly for the last few months on just when KenJen's reign as Jeopardy champion would end, much of it pretty open about the $2.5 million figure that was touted as the benchmark, Sony Corporation, which owns Jeopardy, was strangely silent. In fact, radio spots run on Air America over last weekend and on Monday and Tuesday made it pretty clear that Ken's time was nigh. James Zambon even notes that the venerable Washington Post spoiled the outcome in their November 30 morning edition.

But when long-time blogger Jason Kottke posted an audio clip and redacted transcript of the Ultimate Moment, it wasn't enough for Sony to simply ask Kottke politely to take the clip down (which he did, when asked), now Sony is taking legal action.

Kottke, a longtime blogger who was profiled in no less than The New Yorker is now considering shutting down his blog rather than deal with this kind of bullshit. Meanwhile, the Detroit Free Press reports that WMAZ-TV in Macon Georgia, ran the End of Ken four days early when a technician popped in the wrong tape. Somehow I don't think Sony is going after them.
Bookmark and Share

Another nutball who thinks God talks to him
Posted by Jill | 1:32 PM

But hey, as long as he's a Christian, it's possible God really IS talking to him, right?

Police said the Valparaiso High School student accused of slashing five of his classmates told officers God directed him to do it because they were "sinners."

However, the suspect, 15-year-old James Lewerke, wasn't targeting any specific students, but rather put them all in the same category, police said.

[snip]

The suspect said he obtained the weapons -- a machete and a tree saw -- from his family's barn and, after planning for "quite awhile," decided to carry out the act on that particular day, Stone said.

"He kept it quiet," Stone said.

"It was between him and God. ... He said kids were sinners and God had given him direction."


So how does that differ from God telling George W. Bush to smite Saddam Hussein?
Bookmark and Share

HoDee or Bust!
Posted by Jill | 1:27 PM

As interesting a choice as Simon Rosenberg might be to head the DNC, the rumblings out of the Democratic Governors' Conference calling for yet more "moderation", which as we all know is code for "becoming even MORE like the right wing kooks in power" make me believe more firmly than ever that nothing short of a complete retrenchment of the Democratic Party will bring me back into the fold.

It's really starting to look like Dean or Nobody to me.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean gave an animated, hour-long speech to about 1,700 students at an ASSU Speakers Bureau event at Memorial Auditorium Monday night, where he talked about the future of the Democratic Party, moral values, globalization, public service and that scream.

[snip]

While Dean praised Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry for running a clean campaign, he criticized the Democrats for mimicking the Republican Party.

“We don’t need two Republican Parties in this country,” Dean said. “Truman once said, ‘If you run a Republican against a Democrat who acts like a Republican, the real Republican wins every time.’”

Dean urged the Democratic Party leadership to present “an opposition model, a real difference” to the Republican platform. “If you ever want to win again, then stand for something, stand for what you believe in,” he said.

Democrats are “bad at messaging” their moral values, which Dean said are rooted in “a sense of obligation to each other.” He advocated speaking about charged issues on Democratic terms.

“Instead of fighting about gay marriage, what we ought to be fighting about is that every single American has the same rights as every other American,” he said. “We don’t have to debate on their terms, let’s debate them on our terms.”

Dean also talked about the impact of globalization on the world community.

“Globalization is neither good nor bad, it’s how you do it,” he said. “All we’ve done is globalized the rights of corporations.”

“The role of government in a capitalist society is to make sure we don’t have 12-year-olds working 12-hour days in cotton mills, either in this country or in Malaysia where they’re putting together Nike shoes,” Dean said.

“Let’s globalize worker protections and environmental protections and level the playing field,” he added.

Dean also said that young people have a unique stake in the future of the world due to new information and communication technologies like the Internet.

“Yours is the first generation in America to see the whole world as your community.”

Dean and his former campaign manager Joe Trippi have been credited with revolutionizing political campaigns by using the Internet as a powerful tool for fundraising and organizing supports.

“You really do have the power,” Dean said. “But you get a ‘D’ for voting - it’s the bare minimum for your democracy to thrive.”

Dean encouraged the audience to make change happen by running for office, even if it’s just within their communities. “You can’t win if you don’t run,” he said.

In one of the many humorous moments of the night, Dean poked fun at his impassioned campaign speech after the Iowa primaries almost a year ago, which was replayed by the news media countless times.

“First of all, let me just get this out of the way: YEEAWW!” Dean yelled, inciting a thunderous wave of applause and laughter. “Was that so terrifying?” he asked.


Exactly. What was so terrifying? Because a bunch of media pundits thought that turning down the ambient noise in order to turn Dean into their own private pinata seemed like fun?

Dean UNDERSTANDS what the rest of the party doesn't -- that it's not the ideology, it's the message. Passive pussy-ass Democrats have allowed Republicans to define them, because either they have forgotten what they used to stand for, or they are owned by the same people. Doesn't matter. They've lost ground steadily over my entire life, Clinton notwithstanding.

People really do have progressive values. They believe in hard work being rewarded as opposed to the accident of birth determining where you end up. They believe in helping their neighbors. They believe in equal rights. Democrats have allowed Republicans to distort this into something bad. It's time to take back the agenda. And only Dean is equipped to do that.
Bookmark and Share

The New American Monarchy
Posted by Jill | 1:27 PM

Like this is some kind of a surprise?

There's this theory going around that President Bush will govern in his second term as a lame duck, with nothing more to gain or lose politically.
But that isn't how Bush is thinking about it. He has Jeb to consider.

Even before this year's election, Jeb Bush was being asked about his aspirations. On Oct. 17, he declared on ABC, "I'm not going to run in 2008. That's not my interest."

But last week, in a meeting with The Washington Times editorial board, Ken Mehlman, the new chairman of the Republican National Committee, put Jeb back in the race.

Responding to a question, Mehlman mentioned eight potential candidates for 2008: Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Virginia Sen. George Allen, Colorado Gov. Bill Owens, Arizona Sen. John McCain, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, George Pataki, Rudy Giuliani - and Jeb Bush.

RNC spokesman Brian Jones insists Mehlman was just speculating about politicians who are being discussed in the media. But Mehlman is not a neutral commentator. He works for George Bush. If the President's brother were really out of the running, the RNC chairman would not mention him.

In fact, the Bushes have been thinking about Jeb's candidacy for years.


I hope you REALLY like the Bush family, because they are going to be pillaging the country for their own gain for a very long time.
Bookmark and Share

Never Mind [/Emily Litella]
Posted by Jill | 1:25 PM

NOW he tells us:

Kenneth Starr says he never should have led the investigation that resulted in the impeachment of former President Bill Clinton.
The former independent counsel, now dean of the Pepperdine University law school, says "the most fundamental thing that could have been done differently" was for somebody else to have investigated Clinton's statements under oath denying he had an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.


And HOW many lives did you destroy, Kenny-boy?
Bookmark and Share

Ashcroft: The Sequel
Posted by Jill | 1:11 PM

And you thought this lunacy might disappear once Ashcroft left and the Boobs of Justice were revealed once more.

Running Scared directs us to this:

US distributors of the film Merchant of Venice, which premiered in London this week, have asked the director to cut out a background fresco by a Venetian old master so it is fit for American television viewers.

US networks have been embroiled in controversy over naked flesh since Janet Jackson exposed a breast during a half-time performance during the Superbowl. A lesser fuss has blown up about a trailer for the hit television series Desperate Housewives on Monday Night football, in which an actress with her back to the camera drops her towel in a locker room.

Distributors regularly ask for cuts in films so that they can be shown on US tele-vision and by airlines. The request to "paint-box the wallpaper" - cover over the fresco - was contained in a letter from the US distrib-utors, Sony, to Michael Radford.

The director had already anticipated one request by shooting extra scenes for television in which bare-breasted prostitutes are fully clothed.

He was also asked to remove scenes of male kissing, a brief female kissing scene - and simulated slaughtering of goats.

The fifth request was to cut out footage showing meat carcasses.

Finally, according to Mr Radford, there was "a very curious request which said 'Could you please paint-box out the wallpaper?'. I said wallpaper, what wallpaper? This is the 16th century, people didn't have wall-paper."

When he examined the scenes, he realised the letter was referring to frescoes by Paolo Veronese, the acclaimed Venetian 16th-century artist, which, when examined closely, showed a naked cupid.


Only in this fucked-up country in this fucked-up millennium can 16th century cherubs in paintings be likened to kiddie porn. Kind of makes you wonder what kind of bizarre sexual fantasies the people making the rules have.
Bookmark and Share

Friday Pet Debate Blogging
Posted by Jill | 11:01 AM

No flames, please. I love dogs. I grew up with dogs. I'm even fond of my mom's 120-pound Rottweiler. But this is still pretty funny, and has more than a soupçon of accuracy.



(from Kirktoons)
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, December 02, 2004

More 20's Nostalgia
Posted by Jill | 1:02 PM

While'we're strolling down memory lane, let's bid a regretful au revoir for now to Messrs. Mackintosh, Morris, Hunter, and Stickley, and visit the farmer at Corrente, for some good old fashioned evangelizin' and morality circa 1927.
Bookmark and Share

Another reason to love Barack Obama
Posted by Jill | 10:28 AM

Ok, this isn't really important in the larger sphere of things, but when you've been as immersed in All Things From the Arts and Crafts Period as I've been for the last few months in my vain quest to emulate some of the look of that movement in a 1950's Cape Cod, the mere sight of a bungalow fireplace can send one into fits of rapture.

From the treasure trove that is House in Progress, here's an entry spotlighting the fabulous prairie green tile fireplace in chez Obama in Chicago.
Bookmark and Share

A Celebration of Heartland Values!
Posted by Jill | 9:41 AM

"Simply astounding...this film fills a much needed void" -- Mixed Reviews

The family film of the year:

Dubya: The Movie

(Yes, I know...no need to tell me)
Bookmark and Share

The Bush Administration wants to turn your children into idiots
Posted by Jill | 7:12 AM

Here's the kind of utter horseshit your kids will learn in the "abstinence-only" programs being touted by the Bush Administration:


  • Half the gay male teenagers in the United States have tested positive for the AIDS virus

  • Touching a person's genitals "can result in pregnancy"

  • A 43-day-old fetus is a "thinking person."

  • HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, can be spread via sweat and tears.

  • Condoms fail to prevent HIV transmission as often as 31 percent of the time in heterosexual intercourse.

  • women who have an abortion "are more prone to suicide" and that as many as 10 percent of them become sterile

  • Chlamydia is linked to heart disease

  • Men need "admiration" and "sexual fulfillment" and women need "financial support", As a result, "Occasional suggestions and assistance may be alright, but too much of it will lessen a man's confidence or even turn him away from his princess."



There is ZERO accountability to the truth in these programs. There is ZERO evidence that ignorance promotes chastity. On the contrary, ignorance has NO effect on chastity, but it sure has an effect on unwanted pregnancy, and not the one the advocates of these programs want. 61% of graduating high school seniors have already had sex. This is reality, folks. Either they're going to have sex armed with information about how to handle it responsible and with maturity, or they're going to fumble around in ignorance and find themselves with an STD or unwanted pregnancy. Obviously, the latter is the "punishment" the wingnuts feel these kids deserve.

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, December 01, 2004

Actionable Fraud
Posted by Jill | 11:40 AM

Here's a terrific post at Kos about the recent election fraud. Not only is there a precedent for dealing with it (other than shrugging shoulders and walking away, as our two most recent nominees have done), but it's pretty clear, when all the shenanigans are put down in one place, that there was actionable fraud on the part of the Republicans in the most recent election, just as there was in 2000.

I'm not laboring under the delusion that we'll be able to do anything about what just occurred. But if we want to assume that there will be another presidential election in 2008 (and I'm not convinced there will be), we need to fix this NOW. They must NOT be allowed to steal another one.

So to all those who demand absolute proof, I once again state that absolute proof of fraud (or a smoking gun) is not needed at this point in the proceedings. However, for those who still want to hear about some quite definitive fraud, please consider the following:

(1) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they have counted all ballots, when they have in fact tossed huge batches of ballots in the trash canisters, then that is actionable fraud.

(2) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they have counted all ballots, when they have in fact loaded huge batches of ballots in the back of a pickup truck that just happens to have a pro-Bush sticker on it, then that is actionable fraud.

(3) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they have turned over all official voting tallies, when they have in fact tossed some official vote tallies that they said didn't exist into trash containers, then that is actionable fraud.

(4) That when voting officials state that they have turned over all official records pursuant to an appropriate Freedom of Information Request (FOIR), when they have in fact not done so, then that is actionable fraud.

(5) That when voting officials secret or destroy public voting records in order to conceal it from the public, then that is actionable fraud.

(6) That when voting officials dissemble anything of significant import concerning an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(7) That when voting officials intentionally give the voting public wrong information about who can or cannot vote in an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(8) That when voting officials intentionally give the voting public wrong information concerning where a person can or cannot vote, then that is actionable fraud.

(9) That when voting officials intentionally give the voting public wrong information about who can or cannot register to vote in an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(10) That when individuals, under the color of authority, accept voter registrations from members of the voting public and promise to bring them to the Registrar of Voters, but instead tear them up or throw them away, then that is actionable fraud.

(11) That when members of the opposing party give the voting public wrong information about who can or cannot vote in an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(12) That when members of the opposing party give the voting public wrong information about where a person can or cannot vote in an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(13) That when members of the opposing party give the voting public wrong information about when a person can or cannot vote in an election, then that is actionable fraud.

(14) That when members of the opposing party tell the voting public that they will be arrested for overdue parking tickets at the polling site when they vote, then that is actionable fraud.

(15) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they do not have any additional machines to put on site, when they know there are another 87 of them sitting in their warehouse, then that is actionable fraud.

(16) That when Blackwell states in a media interview that there were only a few minor problems during the Ohio election, when he knows the statement to be completely false and untrue, then that is actionable fraud.

(17) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they have enough voting machines on site, when they know that they do not, then that is actionable fraud.

(18) That when voting officials tell the voting public that they have sent out by mail, as per individual request, 50,000 absentee ballots, when in fact they did not, then that is actionable fraud.

(19) That when voting officials hide from the voting public the fact that they have thrown out thousands of provisional ballots, then that is actionable fraud.

(20) When voting machine manufacturers actively hide the fact that their key people who generate the secrets codes for their voting machines and tabulators are convicted embezzlers, hackers and felons, then that is ACTIONABLE FRAUD.
Bookmark and Share

Networks join in the gay bashing
Posted by Jill | 10:08 AM

First ABC (writing with John Stossel's fine hand) decided lo these many years on that the lynching/crucifixion of Matthew Shepard was a simple robbery in the course of a meth-fueled murder, and his sexual orientation had nothing to do with it.

Now CBS and NBC refuse to run an ad from the United Church of Christ which points out that Jesus didn't turn away anyone, because "the fact the Executive Branch has recently proposed a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable for broadcast on the [CBS and UPN] networks."

Since when is the rule "The Executive Branch Proposes, the Networks Dispose"?

Joe in DC at Americablog is right: This is the networks cowering before the Almighty Jesus H. Bush. NBC's agenda is pretty straightforward; its parent company General Electric makes a shitload of money from Bush's warmongering. CBS' capitulation is far more craven. This is their way of saying "Thank you sir, may I have another" in the aftermath of the Dan Rather/TANG documents fiasco.

I wonder how many atrocities Bush will be able to get away with before Sumner Redstone feels he's done enough penance?

Maybe I do post on gay issues more than any straight person from the suburbs has any business doing. But I am two generations removed from a whole much of relatives being shoveled into Hitler's ovens, and when I hear the administration of an American president issuing hate screeds against an entire group of people, simply because they are what they are, I have to speak out. And so should anyone with even a shred of decency. Because it CAN happen here.
Bookmark and Share

Safer, my ass
Posted by Jill | 7:10 AM
If Yossef Bodansky is right, all those people who thought that George W. Bush putting on a flight suit, stuffing socks into his crotch, and talking tough had made us safer, are in for one nasty surprise.

Via Salon:

According to the Jerusalem Post, Yossef Bodansky, the Israeli-born former director of the U.S. Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare and author of "Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America," says that an al-Qaida attack on the U.S. with nonconventional weapons is virtually "inevitable," and that the organization is likely "tying up the knots" for such an attack. "All of the warnings we have today indicate that a major strike -- something more horrible than anything we've seen before -- is all but inevitable," he told the Post on Sunday.

After 9/11 and the launch of the U.S. global war on terrorism, a theological debate began within the operational arm of al-Qaida, Bodansky says, over whether the mass killing of innocents using weapons of mass destruction was permissible. Former CIA analyst and bin Laden expert Michael Scheuer asserted in his book "Imperial Hubris" that bin Laden has had the Islamic world's approval to use nuclear weapons against U.S. civilians since May 2003, when a Saudi cleric condoned it in a "lucidly written" treatise citing Islamic law and rebuking U.S. transgressions against Muslims.

Bodansky argues that Bush's reelection has poured fuel on that fire.

"While bin Laden and his associates argued that by virtue of their participation in US democracy, US citizens were enabling their rulers to fight, other Islamic luminaries contended that this does not permit such massive attacks, Bodansky said. The reelection of Bush in November, he said, was viewed by bin Laden and his cohorts as a decisive answer to this deliberation, with Americans now 'choosing' to be the enemies of Islam. In bin Laden's mind-set, he said, the stage was set for a non-conventional attack. While there may still be some vestiges of debate and doubt within Islamic circles, he believes that planning for such an attack is finished. 'They got the kosher stamp from the Islamic world to use nuclear weapons,' he said."


By the way, Bodansky is a conservative.

That's all right, though. When millions of Americans are dead in a terrorist attack, Bush will just stuff more socks into his codpiece and invade Iran and Syria, Sean Hannity will continue to blame Clinton's penis, and Jerry Falwell will blame homosexuals.
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, November 30, 2004

And so an era ends....
Posted by Jill | 8:40 PM

OK, it's a short and relatively insignificant era, but tonight Ken Jennings' Jeopardy! Reign of Terror came to a rather ignominious end, with a wrong answer to a preposterously easy question: "Most of this firm’s 70,000 seasonal white-collar employees work only four months a year." He was defeated by realtor (that's for you, Lynn!) Nancy Zerg, who came away from slaying Goliath with a paltry $14,001 in beating a guy who averaged $34,063.51 per game.

This is no real secret; speculation has been running for days, and Kottke.org had an audio file of Jennings' defeat up yesterday, though they got nailed by Sony's attorneys and had to take it down.

Still, for all that I'd stopped watching once I'd heard the spoiler that Jennings lost once he hit around $2.5 million in winnings, I can't help but have a sense that the world is just a bit more drab today without the "How high can he go?" speculation of Jenningsmania.

Somehow I don't think Mr. Jennings is going to go away any time soon. The only question is what products and services he's going to endorse. I suspect that both Federal Express and H&R Block will be among his suitors.
Bookmark and Share

Tell me what is so threatening about this family
Posted by Jill | 2:59 PM
I received a year-end newsletter today from a gay friend who lives with her partner and their collective four children.

Excerpts:

"...during the early part of the year, we began searching for a home to buy. In February we signed the purchase agreement, though we couldn't move into the house till June. In May my mom came into town for Memorial Day weekend and we all spent the weekend with N's parents in [city deleted]. The visit was great and gave the two sides of our family a chance to get to know each other. We spent most of the spring preparing for our move, and the rest of the summer was filled with days of unpacking, organizing, and decorating the house. On the 4th, N. and I had a brief getaway to [place deleted]....The next week we travelled to [Red State name deleted] for a reunion with my family...our whole family stayed with my Aunt V. and Uncle E. and we appreciate them so much for opening up their home to us and giving us time to enjoy each other."

"Truly home is where the heart is, and of course our hearts are with our children and each other. But this year, N. and I learned a new meaning of the word 'home' when we bought our own house. We have experienced an abiding peace and contentment since the first night we tucked our kids into bed in the new house, knowing that we were doing so in the place in which we plan to stay until they are grown. We love the feeling of putting down roots in the community and investing in our future.....This house is a dream come true for our family."

"Throughout the year, my loving partner and our beautiful children have continually shown me who I am, who I want to be, and what I value most."


Can someone please tell me how this loving couple, who simply want to bring up their children in a stable home, put food on the table, put down roots in a community, pay their bills, and have a home full of love and laughter, are a threat to ANYONE's marriage?
Bookmark and Share

Here's the war Bush is fighting in our name
Posted by Jill | 2:37 PM

Eric Blumrich does it again. [Note: Not for the squeamish, though if you can handle it, this is must viewing for anyone wanting to be informed of what we're doing to civilians in Iraq.]

Even if you are still clinging to the mistaken delusion that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, and even if you think "they're getting what they deserve" (you're wrong, but whatever), how many dead and disfigured Iraqis does it take before we're "even"? How much destruction are we going to wreak before we can consider 9/11 "avenged"?
Bookmark and Share

Is this related to the gynecologists Bush wants to "share their love...
Posted by Jill | 11:42 AM
...with women across the country?"

With the three Cabinet replacements Bush has announced so far for his second term, he kept his circle tight by dispatching White House staff members to take over the State, Justice and Education departments. Aides said many other such moves will be announced, because Bush and senior adviser Karl Rove are determined to "implant their DNA throughout the government," as one official put it.


(WaPo, via Corrente)
Bookmark and Share

Amen.
Posted by Jill | 11:39 AM
Bookmark and Share
Monday, November 29, 2004

Disclaimer stickers for science textbooks
Posted by Jill | 4:26 PM

Lay in a goodly supply of these for comparison, folks. I suspect you'll be seeing some of them on your child's textbooks within the next four years.
Bookmark and Share

The Danger of American Fascism
Posted by Jill | 1:30 PM

(Source: Air America Place)

Must reading for the DNC. Emphases mine:

The Danger of American Fascism
By Henry A. Wallace
The New York Times
From Henry A. Wallace, Democracy Reborn (New York, 1944), edited by Russell Lord, p. 259.

Sunday 09 April 1944

... A fascist is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an intensity of intolerance toward those of other races, parties, classes, religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends. The supreme god of a fascist, to which his ends are directed, may be money or power; may be a race or a class; may be a military, clique or an economic group; or may be a culture, religion, or a political party.

... The obvious types of American fascists are dealt with on the air and in the press. These demagogues and stooges are fronts for others. Dangerous as these people may be, they are not so significant as thousands of other people who have never been mentioned. The really dangerous American fascists are not those who are hooked up directly or indirectly with the Axis. The FBI has its finger on those. The dangerous American fascist is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.

... They are patriotic in time of war because it is to their interest to be so, but in time of peace they follow power and the dollar wherever they may lead.
...

Still another danger is represented by those who, paying lip service to democracy and the common welfare, in their insatiable greed for money and the power which money gives, do not hesitate surreptitiously to evade the laws designed to safeguard the public from monopolistic extortion. ... The symptoms of fascist thinking are colored by environment and adapted to immediate circumstances. But always and everywhere they can be identified by their appeal to prejudice and by the desire to play upon the fears and vanities of different groups in order to gain power. It is no coincidence that the growth of modern tyrants has in every case been heralded by the growth of prejudice. It may be shocking to some people in this country to realize that, without meaning to do so, they hold views in common with Hitler when they preach discrimination against other religious, racial or economic groups. Likewise, many people whose patriotism is their proudest boast play Hitler's game by retailing distrust of our Allies and by giving currency to snide suspicions without foundation in fact.

The American fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate perversion of truth and fact. Their newspapers and propaganda carefully cultivate every fissure of disunity, every crack in the common front against fascism. They use every opportunity to impugn democracy. They use isolationism as a slogan to conceal their own selfish imperialism.... They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.

Several leaders of industry in this country who have gained a new vision of the meaning of opportunity through co-operation with government have warned the public openly that there are some selfish groups in industry who are willing to jeopardize the structure of American liberty to gain some temporary advantage. ... Monopolists who fear competition and who distrust democracy because it stands for equal opportunity would like to secure their position against small and energetic enterprise. In an effort to eliminate the possibility of any rival growing up, some monopolists would sacrifice democracy itself.
...

Democracy to crush fascism internally must demonstrate its capacity to "make the trains run on time." It must develop the ability to keep people fully employed and at the same time balance the budget. It must put human beings first and dollars second. It must appeal to reason and decency and not to violence and deceit. We must not tolerate oppressive government or industrial oligarchy in the form of monopolies and cartels. As long as scientific research and inventive ingenuity outran our ability to devise social mechanisms to raise the living standards of the people, we may expect the liberal potential of the United States to increase. If this liberal potential is properly channeled, we may expect the area of freedom of the United States to increase. The problem is to spend up our rate of social invention in the service of the welfare of all the people.
...
Democracy can win the peace only if it does two things:

Speeds up the rate of political and economic inventions so that both production and, especially, distribution can match in their power and practical effect on the daily life of the common man the immense and growing volume of scientific research, mechanical invention and management technique. Vivifies with the greatest intensity the spiritual processes which are both the foundation and the very essence of democracy.

The moral and spiritual aspects of both personal and international relationships have a practical bearing which so-called practical men deny. This dullness of vision regarding the importance of the general welfare to the individual is the measure of the failure of our schools and churches to teach the spiritual significance of genuine democracy. Until democracy in effective enthusiastic action fills the vacuum created by the power of modern inventions, we may expect the fascists to increase in power after the war both in the United States and in the world.
...

It should also be evident that exhibitions of the native brand of fascism are not confined to any single section, class or religion. Happily, it can be said that as yet fascism has not captured a predominant place in the outlook of any American section, class or religion. It may be encountered in Wall Street, Main Street or Tobacco Road. Some even suspect that they can detect incipient traces of it along the Potomac. It is an infectious disease, and we must all be on our guard against intolerance, bigotry and the pretension of invidious distinction. But if we put our trust in the common sense of common men and "with malice toward none and charity for all" go forward on the great adventure of making political, economic and social democracy a practical reality, we shall not fail.
Bookmark and Share

Meet Your New Commerce Secretary
Posted by Jill | 1:09 PM
Meet Carlos Gutierrez:


US President George W. Bush (news - web sites) nominated 51-year-old Carlos Gutierrez, the Cuban-born head of cereals giant Kellogg Co., as his new commerce secretary.

[snip]

said Gutierrez, who began with Kellogg Co. selling cereal out of a van in Mexico City and is now chairman and chief executive of the group, knew the world of business from the first rung of the ladder to the top.

"Carlos's family came to America from Cuba when he was a boy. He learned English from a bellhop in a Miami hotel and later became an American citizen," Bush said at a joint news conference.

"When his family eventually settled in Mexico City, Carlos took his first job for Kellogg as a truck driver, delivering Frosted Flakes to local stores," the US leader said.

"Ten years after he started, he was running the Mexican business. And 15 years after that, he was running the entire company."

The president called on the Senate to confirm the nomination as quickly as possible.

Bush vowed to reform the "outdated" tax code so as to eliminate pointless paperwork while stimulating savings, investment and growth.

He promised to cut the burden of "junk lawsuits" on business.

The administration also would help more Americans, especially minorities and women, start small businesses, he said.

"He knows exactly what it takes to make American businesses grow and create jobs," Bush said.



Here's how Gutierrez was creating jobs in 1999:

In a move to cuts costs, Kellogg Company said it is considering the closure of the South Operations portion of its Battle Creek, Mich., cereal plant. The closure would eliminate up to 64 percent of the jobs at the facility.

"Streamlining our operations and avoiding future costs would help keep our North American cereal business cost-competitive going into the 21st century," said Kellogg chief exec Carlos Gutierrez.

Under the proposal being considered, up to 700 of the current 1,100 "hourly and salaried positions at the plant would be eliminated as early as the first quarter of 2000. The news comes seven months after Kellogg cut 525 jobs -- 21 percent of its salaried workforce -- as part of a reorganization of its North American operations.


So I guess what we can read from this is that women and minorities can plan to start businesses selling their worldly goods on Ebay.

(via Kos)
Bookmark and Share

I guess that means I can't have those mission-style built-ins...
Posted by Jill | 11:33 AM
Maybe this is why the RAND corporation doesn't make home PCs:



I love this part: "With teletype interface and the FORTRAN language, the computer will be easy to use."

FORTRAN.....brrrrr.....
Bookmark and Share

Which war is this, anyway?
Posted by Jill | 10:47 AM

This time I hope the captains of these boats bring their video cameras, or some millennial John O'Neill will be after THEM for 30 years after Bush decides to cut and run from Iraq after he gets bored.

As marines aboard fast patrol boats roared up the Euphrates on a dawn raid on Sunday, images pressed in of another American war where troops moved up wide rivers on camouflaged boats, with machine-gunners nervously scanning riverbanks for the hidden enemy.

That war is rarely mentioned among the American troops in Iraq, many of whom were not yet born when the last American combat units withdrew from Vietnam more than 30 years ago. A war that America did not win is considered a bad talisman among those men and women, who privately admit to fears that this war could be lost.

But as an orange moon sank below the bulrushes on Sunday morning, thoughts of Vietnam were hard to avoid.

Marines waded ashore through soft silted mud that caused some to sink to their waists, M-16 rifles held skyward as others on solid land held out their rifle barrels as lifelines.

Ashore, sodden and with boots squelching mud, the troops began a five-hour tramp through dense palm groves and across paddies crisscrossed by deep irrigation canals.

There were snatches of dialogue from "Apocalypse Now," and a black joke from one marine about the landscape resembling "a Vietnam theme park."

But behind the joshing lay something more serious: the sense expressed by many of the Americans as they scoured the area that in this war, too, the insurgents might have advantages that could make them a match for highly trained troops, technological gadgetry and multibillion-dollar war budgets.

The 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit conducted the river raid as part of a weeklong offensive billed as a sequel to the battle for Falluja, less than 20 miles upriver from the village where the marines landed Sunday.

The 40-foot river craft they used are called Surcs, for Small Unit Riverine Craft, a high-tech update on the Swift boats used in Vietnam. The craft were flown into Iraq aboard giant C-5 transport aircraft and were first deployed with five-man crews during the battle for Falluja this month, patrolling the stretch of the Euphrates that runs along the city's western edge to prevent attempts by insurgents to escape that way after American troops had thrown a cordon around the city.

Those patrols were judged a success by American commanders. Now they are eager to exploit the potential the patrol boats give them for mounting fast, unexpected attacks along the Tigris and the Euphrates. The rivers run through many of the cities and towns that are rebel strongholds, and the long stretches of verdant riverbank provide ideal hiding places for insurgents and their weapons caches.
Bookmark and Share

Safe, Legal, and Rare
Posted by Jill | 10:30 AM
The American people, seemingly completely ignorant of the implications of re-electing the theocratic wahoo who never made any secret of his wahoo-ness, still oppose overturning Roe v. Wade:

U.S. President George W. Bush's nominee for the next Supreme Court vacancy should be willing to uphold the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed abortion rights, according to a majority of Americans in an Ipsos-Public Affairs poll for the Associated Press.

Fifty-nine percent said Bush should choose a supporter of Roe v. Wade, while 31 percent said they want a nominee who will try to overturn the decision, according to the poll. Support for Roe v. Wade was seen among both men and women, across most age and income groups, and in urban, suburban and rural areas, AP said.

Bush, whose supporters in the Nov. 2 election included groups that oppose abortion, is expected to get an opportunity to put his stamp on the court during his second term, as a result of departures from the bench caused by retirement or illness. All but one of the nine justices are over 65, including Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 80, who has thyroid cancer.

More than 60 percent of all respondents said a nominee should reveal his or her position on abortion before Senate confirmation, according to the Nov. 19-21 telephone poll of 1,000 adults.


Boy, are they in for a surprise when Miguel Estrada or Edith Jones become the next Supreme Court Justice.

Prediction: After they get rid of Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut is next.

All you folks who decided that John Kerry was a flip-flopper and George W. Bush will keep you safe? THIS is what you voted for. Don't come crying to me.
Bookmark and Share

Can Saint Hello Kitty be far behind?
Posted by Jill | 9:57 AM

Following on the heels of the $28,000 grilled cheese sandwich that supposedly bears the image of the Virgin Mary (I think it looks more like the Steichen photograph of Greta Garbo, myself) comes the Hello Kitty Miracle Sandwich.

Bidding closed at $61.00. And we wonder how George W. Bush was re-elected?
Bookmark and Share

Moral values indeed
Posted by Jill | 9:53 AM

Hecate at Atrios points out that "In 1996, when 40 percent of Americans based their votes on "moral values," they re-elected Bill Clinton. Now that the number of Americans who base their votes on "moral values" has been cut almost in half, they selected George Bush. And this gives the Racist Radical Clerics the ability to force their "religion" down everyone's throats?"

I have nothing to add but "Amen."
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, November 28, 2004

One state two state red state blue state
Posted by Jill | 10:06 PM

Fascinating stuff....on the heels of Jerry Falwell's blunderbussing on Meet the Press this morning comes Middle Earth Journal, which blows Falwell's ideas about Good Kristian Families in the red states to smithereens. Turns out those red staters extolled by Mr. Falwell and his ilk aren't as moral as he thought. Whether it's alcohol, teen birthrates, or divorces, the red states have us Godless liberals in the northeast beat by a mile.
Bookmark and Share

The Death of Science in America: Chapter 1
Posted by Jill | 9:58 PM

ModFab reports on the new Museum of Earth History, which will feature creationist rebuttals to scientific principles. Check out the exhibits, which include "The Tower of Babel", "The Ice Age", "Eden", "The Fish Aquarium", and for some reason, "The Curse". Why they're including an entire exhibit on my grandmother's term for menstruation, I have no idea.

All your relatives who voted for George W. Bush? Tell them this is what they voted for, and ask them if that was their intention.
Bookmark and Share

Now Osama REALLY Bin Forgotten
Posted by Jill | 7:03 AM

I wonder how all those who voted for George W. Bush because he'd keep us safe from terrorists feel about this:

PESHAWAR, Pakistan - The Pakistan army said today it will withdraw hundreds of troops from a tense tribal region near Afghanistan where Osama bin Laden and his top deputy were believed to be hiding.
The withdrawals from the South Waziristan area come after several military operations by thousands of troops against remnants of bin Laden's Al Qaeda organization and its supporters in recent months.

Although the tribal region is considered a possible hiding place for bin Laden and his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, a senior Pakistan general said earlier this month that no sign of bin Laden has been found.

Bin Laden, architect of the Sept. 11 attacks against the United States, has been on the run since U.S. forces invaded Afghanistan in October 2001, routing the Taliban rulers, who harbored Al Qaeda militants.

The army will remove checkpoints in Wana, the main town in South Waziristan, Lt. Gen. Safdar Hussain, the top general in northwestern Pakistan, said after meeting with tribal elders Friday.

He said the moves are "in return for the support of tribesmen in operations against foreign miscreants." Some troops will remain in the area, he said.

"We have been assured by tribal elders that they will not allow miscreants to hide in areas under their control," Hussain said.

Between 7,000 and 8,000 Pakistani forces were deployed in a three-pronged offensive in the eastern reaches of the rugged region this month. U.S. military forces remain largely on the Afghanistan side in hopes of capturing or killing any Al Qaeda operatives crossing the border.


For those who have forgotten, here's the official scorecard:

Terrorists under the direction of Osama Bin Laden attacked the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. After ousting the Taliban in Afghanistan, who were believed to have been harboring Osama Bin Laden, but without apprehending Bin Laden Himself, the United States invaded Iraq, a country that had absolutely nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11. Saddam Hussein is now in custody, and Iraq is now overrun with terrorists. Osama Bin Laden is still out there, and Pakistan has withdrawn its help in finding him. Meanwhile, George W. Bush was re-elected "to keep us safe from terrorists."

Does any of this make sense to anyone? I myself now believe more strongly than ever that Bush and Bin Laden are in cahoots with each other, because both of them have benefitted hugely from both 9/11 and the Iraq war.

Happy holidays, everyone.
Bookmark and Share