"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, May 12, 2007

The Daily Knut
Posted by Jill | 8:40 AM
How DO you teach a polar bear cub to swim?

[UPDATE: video deleted because it was mucking around people's browsers. You can view it here.]

The adult polar bear pictured is Knut's father, Lars. I'm told that the footage of the frightened cub is Lars in his youth to illustrate how it is not unusual for cubs to be somewhat afraid to swim at first.

Whenever I'm tempted to think that Thomas Doerflein has the coolest job in the known universe, I remind myself that we never see Knut poop in these videos, nor are the videos in smell-o-vision.

UPDATE: Oh. My. God. This is "Peace", who was hand-raised in Japan's Tobe Zoo in 1999. You have been warned, though -- Japan is where they have elevated Cute to an art form:



Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Worst New Web Site
Posted by Jill | 8:26 AM
via Cliff Schecter comes must-not-see TV.

At this point, I say let's just give them South Carolina and be done with it.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Render Unto Caesar
Posted by Jill | 7:46 AM
I would not find it nearly so disheartening to hear Democratic candidates for the presidency talking about "respecting people of faith" were there not so many such "people of faith" trying to ram their religious beliefs down the throats of the rest of us via the legislative and judicial processes.

We've already seen five Roman Catholic Supreme Court justices decide that even a doomed fetus' short life is more important than that of its mother in Gonzales vs. Carhart. And while Dick Cheney's ambitions in the Middle East may be to own it all for Halliburton, George W. Bush's seem more as if he's trying to fulfill his self-styled role as God's Anointed Architect of the Rapture. The other day we saw the Pope use the "E" word -- excommunication -- to describe Catholic politicians in Mexico who legalized abortion there. Of course in keeping with the current trend of the sanctimonious refusing to actually deal with the consequences of their edict, he said that they have "excommunicated themselves." But the message was clear -- support abortion and risk being kicked out of the church.

It's mind-boggling that forty-seven years after we thought the election of John F. Kennedy had put the "religion before policy" argument to rest, we have to deal with it again. But this is largely because of the Republican adoption of the most extreme elements of those so-called "people of faith" as the party's base. And that base is tired of being good soldiers, of having their concerns be the focus of lip service followed by what they see as insufficient action. When Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson found colleges and law schools and think tanks, and their graduates are guaranteed jobs in Republican-controlled government, I don't care if you're mandating believing that a Jewish carpenter who got nailed to a cross 2000 years ago was the literal son of some great white Alpha Male in the sky -- you are establishing religion in direct conflict with Amendment I of the Bill of Rights.

Now Mitt Romney, in what I wish I could be sure was a ridiculous pandering to the Christofascist Zombie Brigade, is citing Scripture to defend his stand against gay marriage:

The former Massachusetts governor, who in his 1994 Senate bid pledged to be a more effective champion for gay causes than his Democratic rival, discussed gay marriage in an interview set to air Sunday on CBS' "60 Minutes."

"This isn't just some temporary convenience here on Earth, but we're people that are designed to live together as male and female and we're gonna have families," he tells interviewer Mike Wallace, according to an excerpt CBS released Friday. "And that, there's a great line in the Bible that children are an inheritance of the Lord and happy is he who has or hath his quiver full of them."


You have to admire how deftly he managed to get opposition to gay marriage and an embrace of the "quiverfull" movement in the same paragraph. You know what "quiverfull" is, right? It's a movement among these lunatics to pump your wife full of sperm every minute that she isn't pregnant and produce as many people as possible. Under the Jeebolunatic doctrine now endorsed by Mitt Romney, the ideal family looks like this:



That's Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar and sixteen of their children. Baby #17 is due in July. Michelle Duggar has been pregnant seventeen times in nineteen years. Now if that is her choice and they can afford it, more power to them. Far be it for me to sit in judgment. But there seems something cruel about force-weaning a baby at only a few months of age, which is what you'd have to do in order to become pregnant again so quickly. It also seems cruel to enlist the older memebers of such an army to care for the younger, as happens in such large families. I used to work with someone who was the oldest of thirteen, and she would tell us about making dinner for her younger siblings while in her early teens.

But still, one of the arguments about choice is that the choice to, as the parody poster of this family says, use your vagina as a clown car is to be defended as much as the choice to remain childfree. That said, when you look at how the next judicial bastion of mandated fundie life is going to be Griswold v. Connecticut, a presidential candidate, or any candidate for federal office for that matter, who "allows his faith to inform his decision-making" over his obligation to the United States Constitution, has as far as I'm concerned disqualified himself from holding office.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Friday, May 11, 2007

So much for enlightened Gen-Xers and sellout boomers
Posted by Jill | 4:13 PM
Attaturk cites a Gallup poll which shows that the biggest percentage of war hawks by age is in the 30-39 age range.

So I don't want to hear any more about how boomers sold out. George W. Bush spent his college years opposing all of us who marched in the streets, and HE got us into this.

'nuff said.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Around the blogroll and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 6:21 AM
Here is your required reading for today:

Cernig reports on high-level FBI intervention to exonerate Ann Coulter from, yes, actual, real-live voter fraud prosecution. Friends of the Bush Administration get FBI intervention, people who make honest mistakes get prosecuted and jailed. That's America under Republican rule.

Every day Mike Gravel makes me wish he were a viable candidate. Pam has another reason why.

John Batiste has been fired as a military expert for CBS news following his appearance in this ad:





This of course means he's free to talk to the recipient of the first Molly Ivins Award.

C&L has a clip of James Sensenbrenner participating in a hearing about the politicization of the Justice Department by advocating politicization of the Justice Department. Also, check out the Canandian Quarters of Mass Destruction.

Ah, the hell with it. To counteract Spiidey's unique take on cat blogging, here's another Kute Knut fix:




Here's what Knut is missing:




(Maybe he's better off being hand-raised...)

Terrance on why Marriage Means Something. Which reminds me: yesterday my place of employment sent out a notice that as of this month, same sex spouses will be eligible for the same health insurance, life insurance, and long-term care insurance as opposite-sex spouses. Which means that I work in what is now officially the Coolest Workplace Not Involved In the Arts.


Watertiger has one from the "God, I hope this isn't real" files. (WARNING: Do not consume food or beverages after clicking the link.)

At HuffPo, Rahm Emannuel's brother defends his buddy Chris Albrecht. As Curmudgette says at My Left Wing, "Sure he beat up his girlfriend, but he's a really good at spotting talent!" Sure, I loved Six Feet Under and The Sopranos as much as the next guy, and I recognize that without those shows there's no Dexter and no The Tudors but that doesn't mean I think he gets a pass on domestic abuse.

Stephen at The Thinkery calls hate crimes what they are: terrorism.

Demosthenes on The Overton Window and porn.

And if any of you are left who haven't clicked on the above just because it contains the "P" word, Driftglass has a peace treaty for the New Iraq.

(CORRECTION: The first video above is not of Knut, it is Ittybitty, a cub of about the same age at the Brookfield Zoo in Chicago. Insert your own Chicago Cub joke here.)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Rudy Giuliani: Making the world safe for Oxycontin marketing
Posted by Jill | 6:09 AM
Funny how the New York Times has buried Rudy "Law 'n' order" Giuliani's connection to Purdue Pharmaceutical deep in its article about the company's executives' guilty plea to marketing Oxycontin withoug mentioning how addictive it is, repeating the assurance of Bracewell and Giuliani's spokeswoman that "Mr. Giuliani had not been involved in representing the company for several months."

And how long has this case been brewing?

ABC News finds that Giuliani was, in fact, connected with the case:

Drug Enforcement Administration officials tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com Giuliani personally met with the head of the DEA when the DEA's drug diversion office began a criminal investigation into the company.

According to the book "Painkiller," by New York Times reporter Barry Meier, both Giuliani and his then-partner Bernard Kerik "were in direct contact with Asa Hutchinson, the administrator of DEA."

Hutchinson told the Blotter on ABCNews.com today that Giuliani asked for a meeting, "and we gave him a meeting." Hutchinson says he was aware the company was under investigation at the time, and "any time a company is under investigation I like to give them a chance to make their case."

Kerik told New York Magazine at the time that Giuliani had raised $15,000 in donations for a "traveling museum operated by the DEA."

Some officials told ABC News there were questions inside the agency of whether the donations were an attempt to influence the DEA.

Meier wrote that "with Giuliani now in the mix, the pace of DEA's investigation into Purdue's OxyContin plant in New Jersey slowed as Hutchinson repeatedly summoned division officials to his office to explain themselves and their reasons for continuing the inquiry."

Giuliani publicly praised the company, Purdue Pharma, when it hired him in May 2002 for an undisclosed amount. "Purdue has demonstrated its commitment to fighting this problem," he said, referring to the issue of drug addiction.

According to Giuliani Partners, Kerik, a New York City police commissioner under Giuliani, was in charge of helping Purdue improve security at the New Jersey plant.

Kerik left Giuliani Partners after disclosures he was under criminal investigation.

In hiring Giuliani, Purdue said, "Giuliani Partners is uniquely qualified" to address the issue of preventing drug abuse.

The Web site for Giuliani Partners lists Purdue Pharma as one of its current clients.


Funny how Bernie Kerik always shows up in Giuliani's shadier dealings isn't it? Good old Bernie Kerik, the guy Giuliani vouched was so flawless that he didn't need vetting to become the head of the new Homeland Security agency?

Imagine, if you will, a presidential race between Rudy Giuliani and John Edwards. You know as well as I do that Giuliani would hammer Edwards over the head for being a "trial lawyer", and the spin machine at Fox and Elsewhere would thump the meme till it screams for mercy. But that's the Republican way, isn't it? Attack a trial lawyer for trying to get justice for a child whose intestines were sucked into a faulty pool pump when its own standard-bearer lobbied the FDA to go easy on the makers of Rush Limbaugh's narcotic of choice.

The pattern of Rudy Giuliani's corruption becomes clearer every day. From "gifts" of 200,000 worth of World Series rings in return for a subsidy for a new stadium for the Yankees to bribing the DEA, Mr. Tough Prosecutor's chumminess with Bernie Kerik is obviously for reasons far beyond a shared interest in canasta.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

If Karl Rove did nothing wrong, why are they hiding his e-mails?
Posted by Jill | 5:39 AM
What is in Karl Rove's e-mails about his role in the firing of U.S. attorneys that the White House doesn't want us to see?

Murray Waas:

The Bush administration has withheld a series of e-mails from Congress showing that senior White House and Justice Department officials worked together to conceal the role of Karl Rove in installing Timothy Griffin, a protégé of Rove's, as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas

The withheld records show that D. Kyle Sampson, who was then-chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, consulted with White House officials in drafting two letters to Congress that appear to have misrepresented the circumstances of Griffin's appointment as U.S. attorney and of Rove's role in supporting Griffin.

In one of the letters that Sampson drafted, dated February 23, 2007, the Justice Department told four Senate Democrats it was not aware of any role played by senior White House adviser Rove in attempting to name Griffin to the U.S. attorney post. A month later, the Justice Department apologized in writing to the Senate Democrats for the earlier letter, saying it had been inaccurate in denying that Rove had played a role.

Brad Berenson, an attorney for Sampson, said in an interview that his client did not intend to mislead Congress. Sampson, he said, signed off on the February 23 letter based on representations made by the White House that it was accurate.

The withheld e-mails show that Sampson's draft was forwarded for review to Chris Oprison, an associate White House counsel, who approved the language saying that Justice was not aware of Rove having played any role in supporting Griffin. But an earlier e-mail from Sampson to Oprison that has already been made public indicates that the two men discussed Rove and then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers as being at the forefront of Griffin's nomination.

Several of the e-mails that the Bush administration is withholding from Congress, as well as papers from the White House counsel's office describing other withheld documents, were made available to National Journal by a senior executive branch official, who said that the administration has inappropriately kept many of them from Congress.

The senior official said that Gonzales, in preparing for testimony before Congress, has personally reviewed the withheld records and has a responsibility to make public any information he has about efforts by his former chief of staff, other department aides, and White House officials to conceal Rove's role.

"If [Gonzales] didn't know everything that was going on when it went down, that is one thing," this official said. "But he knows and understands chapter and verse. If there was an effort within Justice and the White House to mislead Congress, it is his duty to disclose that to Congress. As the country's chief law enforcement official, he has a higher duty to disclose than to protect himself or the administration."


Of course Gonzales doesn't believe that's true, as is obvious both from his ridiculous testimony, in which he'd rather appear to be a complete moron than complicit. And that the White House doesn't want Karl Rove's role known is yet another indication that the right-wing story of the firings being for cause and something every president has done is utter bunk. Rove's entire career has been about one thing and one thing only: getting his man elected by whatever means necessary. And those means have included tactics from bugging his own office and blaming it on his candidate's opponent to methodically starting and spreading utter falsehoods about his candidates' opponents (from "Ann Richards is a lesbian" to John McCain's illegitimate black baby) to the Florida voter purges of 2000 and the Ohio shenanigans of 2004.

But with more and more states getting the message about the unreliability of touch-screen voting after the many irregularities associated with George W. Bush's 2004 re-election -- phantom votes in New Mexico, the shenanigans in Ohio -- and a GOP in disarray, Rove had to come up with a new way for Republicans to remain in power in 2008. And using U.S. Attorneys to intimidate minority, immigrant, and elderly voters off the rolls was his method of choice.

Nine U.S. attorneys have been fired, but many more who DIDN'T refuse to do the Administration's corrupt bidding are still on the job (*cough* Chris Christie *cough*). So it remains to be seen just how much Rove has been stopped -- unless Congress starts realizing that it is dealing with people who have no respect for the rule of law and stop dealing with them as if they do.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, May 10, 2007

Didn't this used to be called "entrapment"?
Posted by Jill | 9:22 PM
So it turns out that the leader of the so-called Fort Dix Seven and their Pizzas of Mass Destruction Plot was the very FBI informant who broke the so-called terrorist ring:

It was August 2006 when one of the young Muslim men accused of plotting to kill soldiers at Fort Dix first broached the idea, according to the authorities. Talking to an informer who was secretly taping the exchange, the young man said that he thought he could round up six or seven other men willing to take part, and that a rocket-propelled grenade might be the most effective weapon, the authorities said.

And he had one more notion: He wanted the informer to lead the attack, according to a federal complaint. “I am at your services,” the young man is quoted as telling the informer, who had presented himself as an Egyptian with a military background.

That moment, recorded on tape and submitted in federal court this week in Camden, N.J., as the authorities charged six Muslim men in the plot, captures something of the complexity of using informers in terror investigations. The informer, sent to penetrate a loose group of men who liked to talk about jihad and fire guns in the woods, had come to be seen by the suspects as the person who might actually show them how an act of terror could be carried off.

Indeed, over the months that followed, as the targets of the investigation spoke with a sometimes unfocused zeal about waging holy war, the informer, one of two used in the investigation, would tell them that he could get them the sophisticated weapons they wanted. He would accompany them on surveillance missions to military installations, debating the risks, and when the men looked ready to purchase the weapons, it was the informer who seemed to be pushing the idea of buying the deadliest items, startling at least one of the suspects.


So here we have a U.S. attorney for the state of New Jersey, Chris Christie -- the same guy who started an investigation of Bob Menendez right before the November election, an investigation about which you've heard nothing since -- crowing about thwarting a terrorist attack, and it turns out that the informant himself escalated the plot beyond anything this ragtag band of nimrods could come up with. Yes indeed, it's the Miami Seven all over again. God help us if a real terrorist plot is ever hatched while self-serving prosecutors are trying to further their career by busting groups of morons.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Cat blogging
Its early, but...



And its a twofer.



Aren't they just so cute?

Now back to real life for a while.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The Daily Knut
Posted by Jill | 8:01 PM
I don't care what Stephen Colbert says, he's still cranium-combustingly cute:





In case you've never seen the videos at RBB Online, when Knut nibbles on Thomas Doerflein's hand like that? He's PURRING.

All together now:

AWWWWWWWWWWWWW.......

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Now that their careers are at stake, Republicans take action
Posted by Jill | 5:51 AM
It isn't much action, it's more like an agreement to feed America's youth into a meatgrinder for another couple of months, but Congressional Republicans are starting to feel the heat on Iraq:

Participants in Tuesday's White House meeting said frustration about the Iraqi government's efforts dominated the conversation, with one pleading with the president to stop the Iraqi parliament from going on vacation while "our sons and daughters spill their blood." The House members pressed Bush and Gates hard for a "Plan B" if the current troop increase fails to quell the violence and push along political reconciliation. Davis said that administration officials convinced him there are contingency plans, but that the president declined to offer details, saying that if he announced his backup plan, the world would shift its focus to that contingency, leaving the current strategy no time to succeed.

Davis, a former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, also presented Bush dismal polling figures to dramatize just how perilous the party's position is, participants said. Davis would not disclose details, saying the exchange was private. Others warned Bush that his personal credibility on the war is all but gone.

Snow, who sat in on the meeting in the president's private quarters, said it should not be overdramatized or seen as another "marching up to Nixon," a reference to the critical moment during Watergate in 1974 when key congressional Republicans went to the White House to tell President Richard M. Nixon that it was time to resign.

"This is not one of those great cresting moments when party discontents are coming in to read the president the riot act," he said. But Snow acknowledged that the meeting included some blunt, if respectful, discussion.

Davis stressed that Republicans will remain united against the Democratic bill in the House today. But the search for an exit is almost inevitable. "The key for everybody is to try to find a way to declare victory and get out of there," he said.


In other words, the key is to find a way to fool the American people into thinking that we have won some sort of gret victory in Iraq and continue to vote Republican.

I just wish I had more faith in the American people than to think they'll fall for this crap. Alas, look at how FUBAR Iraq has had to become to even get us this far.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, May 09, 2007

If melamine is so safe for human consumption, why are FDA employees being warned
Posted by Jill | 9:54 PM
Itchmo:

Itchmo has learned that the FDA has issued a surveillance order for Chinese vegetable proteins on May 1 — including corn gluten and wheat products — based on melamine contamination.


Despite repeated FDA statements saying that there is no risk to human health from contaminated pigs and chickens, the FDA surveillance order indicates otherwise. It states: Pregnant women should not perform this assignment. (Emphasis ours)


Melamine and additional related contaminants have been found in concentrations of up to 20% in analyzed samples. The MSDS for pure melamine is attached as Attachment B and includes warnings “to avoid breathing dust, avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing”. Chronic exposure may cause cancer or reproductive damage.


Clearly, the FDA is concerned with the safety of their own staff’s exposure to melamine-tainted foods. Despite this warning, the FDA told the press and us yesterday that animals that ate tainted foods were safe for human consumption.


This PDF document contains the basis for FDA’s warning to it’s staff.


In fact, the Chinese factory that produced melamine-tainted wheat products was long associated with toxic symptoms. (Reg. required)


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

The legacy of the "sanctity of human life" president
Posted by Jill | 9:59 AM
Abortion is murder. Embryonic stem cell research is murder. Birth control is murder. A war in which one in eight Iraqi children dies before reaching age 5 is somehow perfectly OK with the Bush Administration and their evil minions in Congress and elsewhere:

The chance that an Iraqi child will live beyond age 5 has plummeted faster than anywhere else in the world since 1990, according to a report released Tuesday, which placed the country last in its child survival rankings.

One in eight Iraqi children died of disease or violence before reaching their fifth birthday in 2005, according to the report by Save the Children, which said
Iraq ranked last because it had made the least progress toward improving child survival rates.

Iraq's mortality rate has soared by 150 percent since 1990. Even before the latest war, Iraq was plagued by electricity shortages, a lack of clean water and too few hospitals.


But I guess those children aren't suffering any more than George and Laura Bush are.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Swiftboat this, bitchez!
Posted by Jill | 8:12 AM
Bookmark and Share

Here's why George W. Bush likes Nicolas Sarkozy so much
Posted by Jill | 7:05 AM
They truly are kindred spirits:

France's next president Nicolas Sarkozy holidayed on Tuesday in Malta ahead of launching a radical reform programme, while back home cities across the country were hit by more violent "anti-Sarko" protests.

Sarkozy boarded a yacht in the Mediterranean island with his wife Cecilia and their 10-year-old son Louis on Monday at the start of a three-day break, far from the hectic post-election atmosphere in Paris.

The family arrived there on a private plane after the 52-year-old right-winger's election victory on Sunday. He won 53 percent of the votes to 47 percent for his Socialist rival Segolene Royal.

Sarkozy, who has relentlessly manoeuvred his way to power over the past five years, had pre-planned the break to recover from his gruelling campaigning and to mentally ready himself for France's highest office.


I'm sure the working classes in France are encouraged by their new president so desperately needing a vacation before actually doing anything.

(h/t: Larisa Alexandrovna)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Time to start that food blog
Posted by Jill | 6:17 AM
I've been kicking around the idea of starting a participatory food blog. Part of it is that I want to get my hands on a Drupal project, but part of it is that it becomes more clear every day that the meat-centered way I've been cooking most of my life just isn't viable anymore. This sucks royally, because I do like meat and I seem to have the sort of metabolism that remains satisfied longer from a meal with meat than without one.

So if I ever have a chance to breathe without water in the basement or bathroom floors that need replacing because when they took the old vanity out they found that there was no flooring underneath it, I'll be moving towards that as a side project.

But meanwhile, the melamine problem gets worse.

David Goldstein reports that melamine has now been found in farmed fish. Of course the FDA won't tell us which kinds of fish are affected (though it's a pretty safe bet that it's salmon). He also reports that the so-called "wheat gluten" that was tainted with melamine is actually just plain old wheat flour:

I just have to say that this is STUNNING. Two months after first determining a problem with “wheat gluten flour” they only now determine it was really plain old wheat FLOUR? Anybody who has ever baked bread would have been able to tell the difference… the two products have different color and texture. Mix in a little water and rub it between your fingers, and you can tell the difference with your eyes closed.


He's absolutely right. I have a box of vital wheat gluten that I often use when I make bread in the bread machine. And yes, you most certainly can tell the difference. But it's clear now that the so-called "wheat gluten" imported from China had such high levels of melamine because they were trying to pass off flour as gluten by artificially pumping up the protein readings using an industrial chemical used to make plastic.

Yesterday on the ghastly WWRL morning radio show, the idiotic Sam Greenfield posited the possibility that this was some sort of exercise in terrorism on the part of the Chinese. I think he's completely off-base here. I don't think it's terrorism, it's just plain old good old-fashioned corporate greed -- greed on the part of the Chinese companies that sold adulterated products as something else, greed on the part of ChemNutra, which sought to save a few bucks by buying cheaper Chinese product, and greed on the part of Menu Foods, which sought to save a few bucks by buying ChemNutra's cheaper products.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 6:15 AM
Kevin Drum:

Is al-Qaeda recruiting these doofuses just to lull us into a false sense of security? Or maybe they're Jon Stewart fans and want to provide him with fresh material? WTF?


(h/t: ShakesSis)

I will monitor Crooks and Liars on this. When Jon Stewart reports it, we'll have the story.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

It isn't just Rumsfeld who shook hands with Saddam Hussein
Posted by Jill | 6:07 AM
It's Saint Condi, too, who was involved in shady dealings with Hussein in the name of cold hard cash:

Chevron, the second-largest American oil company, is preparing to acknowledge that it should have known kickbacks were being paid to Saddam Hussein on oil it bought from Iraq as part of a defunct United Nations program, according to investigators.

The admission is part of a settlement being negotiated with United States prosecutors and includes fines totaling $25 million to $30 million, according to the investigators, who declined to be identified because the settlement was not yet public.

The penalty, which is still being negotiated, would be the largest so far in the United States in connection with investigations of companies involved in the oil-for-food scandal.

The $64 billion program was set up in 1996 by the Security Council to help ease the effects of United Nations sanctions on Iraqi civilians after the first gulf war. Until the American invasion in 2003, the program allowed Saddam’s government to export oil to pay for food, medicine and humanitarian goods.

Using an elaborate system of secret surcharges and extra fees, however, the Iraqi regime received at least $1.8 billion in kickbacks from companies in the program, according to an investigation completed in 2005 by Paul A. Volcker, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve.

By imposing surcharges on the sale of crude oil, the Iraqi regime skimmed about $228 million from its oil exports.

A report released in 2004 by an investigator at the Central Intelligence Agency listed five American companies that bought oil through the program: the Coastal Corporation, a subsidiary of El Paso; Chevron; Texaco; BayOil, and Mobil, now part of Exxon Mobil. The companies have denied any wrongdoing and said they were cooperating with the investigations.

As part of the deal under negotiation, Chevron, which now owns Texaco, is not expected to admit to violating the U.N. sanctions. But Chevron is expected to acknowledge that it should have been aware that illegal kickbacks were being paid to Iraq on the oil, the investigators said.

The fine is connected to the payment of about $20 million in surcharges on tens of millions of barrels of Iraqi oil bought by Chevron from 2000 to 2002, investigators said.

These payments were made by small oil traders that sold oil to Chevron. But records found by United Nations, American and Italian officials showed that they were financed by Chevron.

[snip]

According to the Volcker report, surcharges on Iraqi oil exports were introduced in August 2000 by the Iraqi state oil company, the State Oil Marketing Organization. At the time, Condoleezza Rice, now secretary of state, was a member of Chevron’s board and led its public policy committee, which oversaw areas of potential political concerns for the company.

Ms. Rice resigned from Chevron’s board on Jan. 16, 2001, after being named national security advisor by President Bush.

Sean McCormack, a State Department spokesman, referred inquires to Chevron.


Sort of makes all of Condi's bloviatings about Saddam Hussein being the Most Evil Man Ever seem just a wee tad disingenuous now, doesn't it? So can we stop touting her as presidential material now?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Meanwhile, how's the surge working?
Posted by Jill | 6:03 AM
BBC:


We were at the airport. Just before we were due to leave, the entrance car park was hit by a car bomb.

US troops and private security forces who guard the perimeter locked the whole area down for the next four hours. No traffic was allowed in or out.

While we waited with scores of other vehicles, mortars were fired at the airport. Fortunately for us they landed on the other side of the runway, plumes of smoke shooting into the air.

You won't have heard about any of this because at the same time a series of other far more serious attacks was taking place.

One was at the Sadriya market in the city centre, where a massive car bomb killed more than 140 people.

[snip]

As we drove into the city, we counted six blast holes left by recent roadside bombs along just one 100-metre stretch of road.

A large patch of damaged, blackened Tarmac on a bridge spoke of another attempt to destroy a key crossing.

The Sunni extremists held to be responsible for these attacks seem to be making a mockery of the US and Iraqi security plan, which is now into its third month.

So far, their surge seems to be having more effect than the American one.

Last month alone there were more than 100 car bombings, and the number of attacks has continued at a similar rate so far this month. This indicates a high level of organisation.

This despite the fact that there are many extra US and Iraqi troops in the city now. There are more raids and patrols.

On our drive into the city, we encountered several Iraqi army checkpoints. But almost every vehicle - including ours - was being waved through.

Many new checkpoints have been set up across Baghdad.

But what is their purpose, many Iraqis ask, when they seem to stop so few people?

It is not always encouraging when they do - a couple of times we have been pulled over by Iraqi soldiers who ask us if we have any bullets to give them.


If you needed further proof that even with the so-called "surge",, this war is being fought on the cheap, there you are. How on earth are another 35,000 underequipped troops going to deal with this?

This president is quite simply just trying to run out the clock on his presidency and, as has been characteristic his entire adult life, leaving the mess for the next president to clean up. And since it looks increasingly likely that the next president may very well be a Democrat, it's clear that he wants to leave as big a mess as possible.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

President Bush Aspires to Kill 35,000 Troops in Iraq
Posted by Jill | 5:49 AM
Yes, it's a ludicrous headline. But is it any more ludicrous than the media's current hysteria over six terrorist wannabes in Jersey who only had access to purchase the weapons they wanted because an FBI sting operative said he'd sell them to them?

While the media dutifully does its job of attempting to whip the public into a frenzy about the latest misfits in search of self-styled jihadist glory and the loathsome Chris Christie tries to play on public fears to launch whatever seat in Washington for which he's planning to run next year, let's look again at what the troops' own Commander-in-Chief is doing to them:

The Pentagon announced yesterday that 35,000 soldiers in 10 Army combat brigades will begin deploying to Iraq in August as replacements, making it possible to sustain the increase of U.S. troops there until at least the end of this year.

U.S. commanders in Iraq are increasingly convinced that heightened troop levels, announced by President Bush in January, will need to last into the spring of 2008. The military has said it would assess in September how well its counterinsurgency strategy, intended to pacify Baghdad and other parts of Iraq, is working.

"The surge needs to go through the beginning of next year for sure," said Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the day-to-day commander for U.S. military operations in Iraq. The new requirement of up to 15-month tours for active-duty soldiers will allow the troop increase to last until spring, said Odierno, who favors keeping experienced forces in place for now.

"What I am trying to do is to get until April so we can decide whether to keep it going or not," he said in an interview in Baghdad last week. "Are we making progress? If we're not making any progress, we need to change our strategy. If we're making progress, then we need to make a decision on whether we continue to surge."


35,000 troops is not going to pacify Iraq. And as for progress, well, is Odierno saying it's going to take A FULL YEAR to determine if we're making progress? This country took less time to defeat Hitlerm Mussolini, and the Emperor of Japan. Of course during WWII, Americans were asked to sacrifice to finance the war effort, whereas this president is financing it with crushing debt that the children of the very people who voted for him will never be able to pay back, because HIS constituency -- the beneficiaries of much of his tax cuts -- refuses to sacrifice a nickel, and he knows that the rest of the American people are not inclined to give him another year of a blank check to feed tens of thousands more soldiers into a meatgrinder in an increasingly futile attempt to save his pathetic little ego.

This must stop. Rather than being willing to sacrifice even more of our civil liberties to this lunatic in the name of "safety", it's time for us to demand that he stop the gratuitous killing of a generation of young Americans in the name of his ego. And it's also time to not allow this Administration to play on the reptilian part of the human brain by flogging this arrest in south Jersey the way they have been. If we want to be outraged about plots to kill American soldiers, let's look at the man who is directly responsible for the deaths of over 3300 of them.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Miami Redux
Posted by Jill | 7:54 PM
Remember the infamous "Miami Seven"? The bunch of misfits who dressed up in ninja costumes and had aspirations of "a full ground war against the United States and we knew this because one of them had been to Chicago?

Well, here we are again, with a new bunch of clowns, who again had "aspirations", this time of inflicting massive casualties on American troops....stationed at Fort Dix. Yes, that's FORT Dix. Fort. As in "fortified"? Presumably with weapons? Weapons they hadn't been able to get UNTIL AN FBI GUY OFFERED TO PROVIDE THEM???

Let's look at this sinister bunch of people and the clues, shall we?

OMIGOD, they played PAINTBALL!

Levine recalls seeing some of the brothers shooting paintballs at trees in their front yard, an incident that seemed harmless at the time. Authorities say the group spoke of playing paintball as a training exercise for the attack.


And a video store clerk says that a videotape the men had wanted transferred to DVD showed 10 men shooting at a firing range, calling for jihad and shouting "Allah Akbar!" Do we know that the six arrested today are among the 10? Do we know how old the tape is?

Meanwhile, the loathsome and media whorish Chris Christie, often touted as a Republican challenger to whatever Democrat is up for re-election in any given year, was out in front of the cameras today saying that if six guys with guns had infiltrated a heavily-armed military base, "It could have been a disaster."

If six guys with guns can take over an armed military base, then we are in much bigger trouble than just six Albanians doing some kind of Islamofascist version of imitating what they saw on YouTube.

Shawn Mullen over at The Moderate Voice also notices the similarity of this case to the feckless Miami Seven:

Maybe it’s just me, but there seems to be considerably more caution in the blogosphere today over the announcement that the feds have arrested six men who were planning to attack soldiers at Fort Dix, New Jersey, than breathless reports yesterday that an explosion in a Las Vegas parking garage was a terrorist attack.

That is well and good, because the preliminary reports call to mind those feckless Miami-based terrorist wannabes who were going to take a bus to Chicago and blow up the Sears Tower. Or something.

These alleged terrorists had been under surveillance by the FBI for months, practiced by shooting paintball guns and real weapons in a rural area of the Pennsylvania Poconos and allegedly watched jihadist videos in which Osama bin Laden urged them toward martyrdom.

Captain Ed cut to the chase at Captain’s Quarters in noting that these guys do not appear to have the smarts of typical Al Qaeda operatives insofar as they made a videotape of their training sessions and then went to a retail store to get it made into a DVD.


All I know is that once again, we have George W. Bush in very real danger of losing support from his own party for his much-beloved war in Iraq, and we have an Attorney General who's got one foot out the door and the other on a banana peel -- and right on cue, we have a report of would be "terrorists" who had NO WEAPONS IN THEIR POSSESSION when raided, but had been "trying to acquire" them from an FBI agent who set it up to try to sell it to them.

Now, it's entirely possible that these guys had some notion of being Big Bad Jihadists About to Bring Down America, but let's not forget that this is, after all, six guys. And frankly, if six guys with weapons sold to them by an FBI agent can destroy an entire nation, then perhaps the Twenty-Eight Percent Squadron ought to re-evaluate their worship of the Big Daddy in the Codpiece who Said He'd Keep Them Safe.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Maybe it's only Democratic woman governors named Kathleen who get screwed over by the Bushistas
Posted by Jill | 7:51 PM
Haven't we seen this before?:

This is absolutely ridiculous. It's always the victim's fault. Why can't these people ever just admit they're incompetent and can't run a government? (Rhetorical question.)

AP via HuffPo:


The White House fought back Tuesday against criticism from Kansas' governor that National Guard deployments to Iraq are slowing the response to last week's devastating tornado.


White House press secretary Tony Snow said the fault was Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius'.


In a spat reminiscent of White House finger-pointing at Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco after the federal government's botched response to Hurricane Katrina, Snow rapped Sebelius for not following procedure to find gaps and then asking the federal government to fill them.


"If you don't request it, you're not going to get it," he said.



One slight problem: Governor Sebelius did request it. In fact, she took her concerns to Bush personally in 2006:


Sebelius, a Democrat, has written the Pentagon twice and spoke about the issue at great length with Bush in January 2006 when they rode together from Topeka to a lecture in Manhattan.


"He assured me that he had additional equipment in his budget a year ago. What the Defense Department said then and continues to say is that states will get about 90 percent of what they had," Sebelius said. "Meanwhile, it doesn't get any better. I'm at a loss."



So apparently it doesn't matter if you "request it"; you're still not getting it. What's more, ThinkProgress notes three other times Governor Sebelius lobbied the Pentagon to replace missing equipment.


The governor is not to blame here. She didn't start the war, and she didn't decide to send to send the National Guard equipment to Iraq. And despite her constant efforts to get that equipment back in order to deal with disasters like last weekend's tornado, it's still her fault. Have they no shame? (Another rhetorical question.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

And this differs from what their Commander-in-Chief is doing to them -- how?
Posted by Jill | 10:58 AM
AP:

Six men described by federal prosecutors as "Islamic militants" were arrested on charges they plotted to attack the Fort Dix Army base and "kill as many soldiers as possible," authorities said Tuesday.
Bookmark and Share

Around the blogroll and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 6:46 AM
Because it's a really nice morning and I need to get some oxygen into my lungs, I'm going for a walk and encourage you to do the same. And if you don't feel like it, why not visit some of these interesting people:

Stephen on fundamentalism vs. science.

Pierre Tristram remembers Kent State.

Joshua on The Many Faces of Terror.

ShakesSis on Maggie Gyllenhaal's contribution to the Decline of Western Civilization by daring to show that breasts are for something other than titillating men.

Pam on Bush's towel-snap at the Queen of England, which makes me wish that British royalty still had the power to declare war because of personal slights. Obviously his mama never taught him any manners. We knew he he had issues with his father, but does he have to work out his mother issues on the world stage TOO?

Digby on what George Tenet's book tells us about Bush in the summer of 2001. I don't know about you, but in recent days I've seen a lot more blog comments around from people willing to believe that yes, this Administration IS capable of knowing a massive terrorist attack is about to happen and allowing it to play out for its own political advantage.

Steve Benen on how the White House is dealing with dissent in the ranks by closing ranks.

Larisa Alexandrovna has one of the best blog entry titles ever.

Cernig on how now our enemy IS our friend.

CE Petro has her own blog roundup, which makes me think we should start a blog roundup chain and see how long it takes to make an infinite loop.

And ModFab's theatre roundup documents the atrocities of the upcoming theatre season.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

I know I'm always reassured when a crony appointee says that plastic in the meat is OK
Posted by Jill | 6:29 AM
Of course there are no studies about the risks to humans of consuming melamine, but why should that stop Bush Administration officials from deciding to turn the American population into human guinea pigs in the name of corporate profits?

Consumers face little risk from eating pork, chicken and eggs from farm animals that ate feed mixed with pet food scraps contaminated by an industrial chemical, government scientists said Monday.

Mixing in material contaminated at low levels diluted it such that humans who eat the animals won’t be harmed, the scientists said.

“We literally found that the dilution is so minute, in fact in some cases you can’t even test and find melamine any more in that product,” Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said in Chicago, speaking to the Organic Trade Association.

The government also recommended lifting holds placed on some pigs and chickens after their feed tested negative for the chemical, melamine, and related compounds. Those animals may be slaughtered and enter the food supply, the Agriculture Department and Food and Drug Administration said.

Other animals, including some that ate feed that has tested positive for contamination, are likely to be held for another week pending completion of an assessment of the overall risk of the chemicals to animal health.

Melamine, used to make plastics, and the related compounds contaminated pet food that either sickened or killed an unknown number of dogs and cats. Scraps left over from the manufacture of that dog and cat food was sold for use in animal feed before the pet food was known to be tainted and recalled from store shelves.


You used to have to complete an informed consent form and go through a screening process consisting of various medical tests before being accepted into a study. Now all you have to do is eat chicken and trust the Bush Administration.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Now the Republicans may have to come up with another way to rig elections
Posted by Jill | 5:51 AM
They've lost the sure-bet of black box voting in many states, and now that their scheme to replace U.S. attorneys who refuse to intimidate voters with political operatives who will is imploding, I wonder what they'll come up with to retain power in 2008?

The Senate Judiciary Committee asked Bradley Schlozman, a former senior civil rights attorney and U.S. attorney, to speak with investigators. The Justice Department, meanwhile, said it wouldn't try to prevent Congress from granting immunity to White House liaison Monica Goodling if she testifies before a committee.

Lawmakers want to talk to Schlozman and Goodling as part of an inquiry into whether the department played politics with the hiring and firing of department officials. The inquiry began as a question about whether U.S. attorneys - presidential appointees who serve as the top federal law enforcement officials in their state districts - were fired for political reasons.

It has grown, however, into an investigation of whether the agency let politics affect criminal investigations and whether officials made employment decisions for political reasons.

Lawmakers want to question Schlozman, who now works for the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, about a voter fraud lawsuit he filed against Missouri in the lead-up to the 2006 election. Committee members said they wanted to know whether Schlozman's predecessor was forced out for not endorsing that lawsuit, which was ultimately dismissed.

``The Committee would benefit from hearing directly from you in order to gain a better understanding of the role voter fraud may have played in the administration's decisions to retain or remove certain U.S. attorneys,'' Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., wrote in a letter co-signed by the committee's top Republican, Arlen Specter of New York.

The letter asked Schlozman to voluntarily submit to interviews and testimony and provide documents to the committee.

Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman, said politics do not influence decisions about whether to bring a case.

``The Justice Department brings its civil actions and criminal prosecutions based on evidence, not on politics,'' Boyd said. ``We expect U.S. Attorneys to bring election and voter fraud cases where evidence of such fraud exists.''


You have to admire the ability of people who work for this administration to so baldfacedly lie with a perfectly straight face.

Meanwhile, Congress might consider hiring Greg Palast, who seems to be able to get his hands on documents that Congress is told are "lost":

Voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called for prison time for the new US Attorney for Arkansas, Timothy Griffin and investigation of Griffin’s former boss, Karl Rove, chief political advisor to President Bush.

“Timothy Griffin,” said Kennedy,”who is the new US attorney in Arkansas, was actually the mastermind behind the voter fraud efforts by the Bush Administration to disenfranchise over a million voters through ‘caging’ techniques - which are illegal.”

[Hear Kennedy on Griffin, Rove and ‘caging lists’ below or here]

Kennedy based his demand on the revelations by BBC reporter Greg Palast in the new edition of his book, “Armed Madhouse.” On one page of the book, Palast reproduces a copy of a confidential Bush-Cheney campaign email, dated August 26, 2004, in which Griffin directs Republican operatives to use the ‘caging’ lists.

This is one of the emails subpoenaed by Congress but supposedly “lost” by Rove’s office. Palast obtained 500 of these, fifty with ‘caging’ lists attached.

‘Caging’ lists are “absolutely illegal” under the Voting Rights Act, noted Kennedy on his Air America program, Ring of Fire. The 1965 law makes it a felony crime to challenge voters when race is a factor in the targeting. African-American voters comprised the bulk of the 70,000 voters ‘caged’ in a single state, Florida.

Palast wrote in his book, “Here’s how the scheme worked. The Bush campaign mailed out letters,” particularly targeting African-American soldiers sent overseas. When the letters sent to the home addresses of the soldiers came back “undeliverable” because the servicemen were in Baghdad or elsewhere, the Republican Party would, “challenge the voter’s registration and thereby prevent their absentee ballots being counted.”

The Republicans successfully challenged “at least one million” votes of minority voters in the 2004 election.


Every day, it becomes more apparent that the "spoiled brat" factor in the Republican Party that has always characterized the life of George W. Bush has infected the entire Republican Party. George W. Bush has ALWAYS insisted on changing the rules so that he wins every time:


Even if he loses, his friends say, he doesn't lose. He'll just change the score, or change the rules, or make his opponent play until he can beat him. "If you were playing basketball and you were playing to 11 and he was down, you went to 15," says [childhood best friend Doug] Hannah, now a Dallas insurance executive. "If he wasn't winning, he would quit. He would just walk off.... It's what we called Bush Effort: If I don't like the game, I take my ball and go home. Very few people can get away with that." So why could George get away with it? "He was just too easygoing and too pleasant."
.

And now, after being drunk with power for over six years, Bush's socipathy has infected the entire Republican Party. They want ALL the marbles. They feel they're ENTITLED to all the marbles. They've held ALL the power for the better part of the last six years, and as soon as anyone dares stand up to them, they cry like babies. When it looks like there's a chance they can't win an election fairly, they rig the system, whether it's through racially-based "felon purges" of people with similar names to actual felons, or thuggish intimidation of people trying to accurately recount votes, or the use of unverifiable voting machines made by companies run by Republican campaign contributors, or as we see now, the hijacking of the entire Department of Justice to serve the electoral needs of the party.

Americans like to believe that we believe in fair play. We give lip service to "playing by the rules" and to obeying the law. So why is it that so many Americans have been so willing to look the other way for this man who has a history of changing the rules until he wins? Why has George W. Bush been granted an exemption to the rules the very people who have supported him hold sacrosanct?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, May 07, 2007

The President of the Republican States of America....and ONLY the Republican states
Posted by Jill | 7:04 AM
Yesterday George W. Bush declared Kiowa County, Kansas a disaster area -- a day and a half after a mile-wide tornado destroyed the town of Greensburg.

Last month's nor'easter hit New Jersey on April 15. Bush didn't declare a disaster and make New Jersey residents eligible for federal help until late Wednesday, May 2.

Kansas voted 62% for George W. Bush in 2004 and 58% in 2000. New Jersey voted 53% for John Kerry in 2004 and 56% for Al Gore in 2000.

Any questions?
Bookmark and Share

Pouring gasoline on the fire
Posted by Jill | 6:55 AM
In what universe does anyone think it's a good idea to send Dick Cheney to the Middle East on a diplomatic mission? Yet that's exactly what's coming.

Jeffrey Feldman:

If the Bush administration was serious about saving lives, building U.S. credibility in the world, involving regional allies, and ending the Iraq occupation -- then they would put Dick Cheney back in his hidden location, lock the door from the outside and throw away the key.

Cheney should not be allowed anywhere near Middle East diplomacy. Any diplomatic effort that involves Dick Cheney will result in one thing and one thing only: more violence, more failure, more death.

An Icon of Violence
Of all the people in the world, today, there is not a single person who symbolizes the arrogance, violence and deceit of the Bush era more than Vice President Dick Cheney.

More than just a failed leader, Cheney has become an icon of violence -- a man whose name and face are synonymous with the an authoritarian view of politics rooted in the ignorant idea that unilateral force can sow everlasting peace.

There have been other icons of violence in history, but Cheney is the most dominant in today's world. Even more than Bush, who has become a symbol of a failed Machiavellian prince, Cheney iconic status is built on his soulless bureaucratic tenor, his relentless commitment to long-since-debunked propaganda, and his constant repetition of doomsday scenarios predicting nuclear Holocaust. Al this means that Cheney did not happen up on his iconic status by chance. He created it himself.

Is there anyone in America -- anyone in the world -- who does not know this about Dick Cheney? No. We all know it. Even in the vile and twisted tangle of the Bush White House, they all know what Cheney symbolizes in the world. They all know that no person is more hated, more distrusted than Dick Cheney. They all know that the world is waiting -- hoping -- not for Dick Cheney to take on a greater role in the mess of the Iraq occupation, but for Dick Cheney to just go away. Far, far away.

Despite all this, next week the White House will send the icon of violence on a diplomatic mission to the Middle East -- ostensibly, in Dana Perino's words, to "follow-up" on the diplomacy of the recent meetings in Sharm el Sheikh.

What a ridiculous idea. What a foolish idea.

Dick Cheney's visit to the Middle East will do to that region what saltwater does to an open wound, what gasoline does to an open flame. Cheney's visit will bring more pain, more flames, more bombs, more lost limbs, more piles of corpses, more puddles of blood, more destroyed Iraqi hopes, more destroyed U.S. military families.

Cheney's visit will send diplomatic efforts backwards, not forwards. It will destroy alliances, not build them.

The first step to ending the mess in Iraq is not to give Cheney a greater role, but to strip him of any role whatsoever.


Dick Cheney is like some kind of succubus who feeds on death. A man whose ticker ought to give out any second seems somehow to be made stronger the more death he can engender. It remains to be seen whether the damage done to America's standing in the world can ever be healed, even by the most skilled diplomats. To send Dick Cheney on a diplomatic mission is to damage our standing beyond all repair.

But given the Republican party's prospects in 2008 at this point, perhaps that's Cheney's real agenda -- to make damn sure to piss off everyone else in the world who isn't already pissed off at us so that no one of the other party, not even someone who makes Bill Clinton Secretary of State, can repair the damage.

(h/t: Cernig)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 6:49 AM
You have no idea how much it pains me to do this, but today's quote comes from the asshole di tutti assholes in Democratic politics, the power-greedy and self-serving Rahm Emmanuel:

"It's clear Congressman Boehner's new timetable for Iraq has less to do with the troops coming home, and has everything to do with his fear that House Republicans will be sent home."

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

So where are the adults already
Posted by Jill | 6:16 AM
Remember when the Bush team came into office and with their stiff grey suits and power ties assured Americans that the pizza-and-khaki days were over and now the adults were in charge?

Obviously in Bushland, adulthood as meaning just wearing a big man suit is just another drag costume, and as far as it goes.

The architect of the so-called "surge" is getting outta Dodge while the getting's still good and people aren't yet asking questions:

Deputy national security adviser J.D. Crouch II, who helped spearhead the recent policy review that led President Bush to send more U.S. troops to Iraq, announced yesterday that he will step down early next month, becoming the latest key aide to depart the White House at a critical juncture.

Crouch, the No. 2 official at the National Security Council, has been a pivotal figure on a series of difficult issues, including Afghanistan, North Korea, Iran and the detention policy for terrorism suspects. And it was his interagency group meeting at the White House complex for many weeks last winter that resulted in the ongoing troop buildup in Iraq, which has become the defining decision of the year for Bush.

In an interview, Crouch said he is leaving to devote more time to his family after six years in the administration. He expressed confidence that Bush's policy of trying to build democracy in Iraq and spread it around the world will ultimately pay off. "I worry about it," he said. "I think it's important to question your assumptions, always ask yourself if you're on the right track. But as I look at the agenda that the president has set out, I think it's the right agenda, and history will vindicate that."

Crouch becomes the second top official involved in crafting the new Iraq strategy to leave before it is clear if the new approach will work.


The next time Americans are tempted to vote for the guy who has the most tough-talk, they might want to keep this in mind.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, May 06, 2007

Playin' with the Big Boyz
Posted by Jill | 9:02 PM
See? I can have a blog reader survey too! Please take a few minutes to complete the survey. Maybe then someone might even buy some ads.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

So much for Rudy Giuliani as the tough guy
Posted by Jill | 5:02 PM
"WAAH! WAAH! WAAH!! Keithy's being mean to me, Ma! Make him stop!"

What a WATB:

Last week, MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann delivered a special comment criticizing Rudy Giuliani for his recent partisan fearmongering. This week, he hosted MSNBC’s coverage of the Republican presidential debate.


Olbermann’s presence on debate night coverage angered the Giuliani campaign. The AP reports:


The Giuliani campaign privately expressed its concern to NBC News about Olbermann’s role in the days leading up to last Thursday’s debate. … MSNBC spokesman Jeremy Gaines said a Giuliani campaign representative had called NBC News to complain about Olbermann being part of the debate telecast following his commentary.


The Giuliani campaign has a right to make its complaints known, just as many on the left have raised arguments about the bias of Fox News’ participation in Democratic debates. But it’s the role of the media to place the story in its proper context, and the AP account fails to do that.


Blindly accepting the Giuliani campaign’s argument, the AP story singles out Olbermann for criticism. “Olbermann’s popularity and evolving image as an ideologue has led NBC News to stretch traditional notions of journalistic objectivity,” the story reports. It continues, “Even for television hosts unafraid to say what they think — Chris Matthews, for instance — there’s still a little mystery about what they’ll do inside a voting booth.”


The AP fails to note that another MSNBC host who was involved in debate night coverage — Joe Scarborough — campaigned for President Bush in 2004. Media Matters has noted that Scarborough also helped propagate partisan talking points. There is certainly no mystery as to who he voted for.


The issue here isn’t Olbermann, who fairly and ably quarterbacked the debate coverage. By uncritically reporting the Guiliani campaign’s argument, the AP engaged in the very bias that its report implies it is above.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 11:16 AM
Yes, I'm being lazy today, after spending much of yesterday taking the crap we took OUT of the basement family room when we pulled up the carpet and putting it BACK and suffering some nasty new-carpet-formaldehyde-related side effects.

But damn if the room doesn't look awesome, and much bigger without that bigass old 1970's bar that we finally dismantled and will put out on household pickup day on Wednesday.

But the quote of the day comes from Tristero:

Even assuming the next president makes Lincoln look like a log, would you trust this country if you were a foreign leader, knowing that not only had it enabled a George W. Bush to run the show but, worse, never held either him or his administration accountable for its serial crimes and failures?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Around the blogosphere and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 6:59 AM
Before taking your tour around Outer Blogtopia (® Skippy), go have a laugh at Paul Wolfowitz blaming "unclear rules" at the World Bank for the furor over him giving huge pay increases to a woman he's fucking. I don't know about you, but in the reality-based community I live in (as opposed to Neocon Delusionland), special treatment for your paramour is usually frowned upon.

Fallenmonk appears to be having the same musings I am over whether the combination of mad cow disease, E coli, and melamine is enough to tip me over into vegetarianism. I'm not sure, however, that this recipe, as tasty as it sounds once you get past the tofu, is enough to do that.

SpinDentist thinks Captain Codpiece has a few rungs yet to drop on the Ladder of Iniquity. I'm not sure I agree, given that his current 28% constitutes those members of the Christofascist Zombie Brigade that are his most loyal and ferocious minions.

If I won the lottery, I'd give some money to ShakesSis to open the Surgetastic Surginating Surge Saloon.

So much for racism no longer being an issue. Pam reports that fresh on the heels of Barack Obama's unprecedented early Secret Service protection comes news that CBS has had to shut down comments on stories about Obama because of they have been attracting racist comments.

Please join me in sending felicitations and kvelling naches to Tata, who is going to be a GRANDMAMA!! If you know Tata, you know just how cranium-exploding this notion is. Would that we all had grandmothers this cool.

And in other baby news, Jackson the Miracle Baby (#20 on our Brilliant of 2006 List) is a month and a week shy of his first birthday. It's not too early to start thinking about presents.

ModFab predicts the Tony Awards, Musicals Edition.

For those of you without Times Select, Jurassicpork has today's Frank Rich column.

How the heck did I miss this story? CE Petro on the theft of a hard drive (I'm sure this is a flash stick) containing personal, payroll, and bank information of 100,000 current and former TSA workers.

The Blogging Curmudgeon thinks that with Captain Codpiece hovering close to the political Mendoza Line, the cornered animal factor will kick in and now bombing Iran is inevitable. I'm afraid I agree

I don't know about you, but at this point I need ever increasing doses of Teh Cute. Videos at Knut's blog usually do it for me.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share