"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, June 23, 2007

OK, then, I want to be a web developer but my religion says I can't use a computer
Posted by Jill | 10:47 AM
Isn't it time to stop making all these allowances for the Christofascist Zombie Brigade? If you aren't willing to practice medicine and provide medical, don't become a doctor. But no, you don't get to decide what you will and will not do for patients:

Lori Boyer couldn't stop trembling as she sat on the examining table, hugging her hospital gown around her. Her mind was reeling. She'd been raped hours earlier by a man she knew — a man who had assured Boyer, 35, that he only wanted to hang out at his place and talk. Instead, he had thrown her onto his bed and assaulted her. "I'm done with you," he'd tonelessly told her afterward. Boyer had grabbed her clothes and dashed for her car in the freezing predawn darkness. Yet she'd had the clarity to drive straight to the nearest emergency room — Good Samaritan Hospital in Lebanon, Pennsylvania — to ask for a rape kit and talk to a sexual assault counselor. Bruised and in pain, she grimaced through the pelvic exam. Now, as Boyer watched Martin Gish, M.D., jot some final notes into her chart, she thought of something the rape counselor had mentioned earlier.

"I'll need the morning-after pill," she told him.

Dr. Gish looked up. He was a trim, middle-aged man with graying hair and, Boyer thought, an aloof manner. "No," Boyer says he replied abruptly. "I can't do that." He turned back to his writing.

Boyer stared in disbelief. No? She tried vainly to hold back tears as she reasoned with the doctor: She was midcycle, putting her in danger of getting pregnant. Emergency contraception is most effective within a short time frame, ideally 72 hours. If he wasn't willing to write an EC prescription, she'd be glad to see a different doctor. Dr. Gish simply shook his head. "It's against my religion," he said, according to Boyer. (When contacted, the doctor declined to comment for this article.)


I would like to know if this doctor is willing to prescribe Viagra.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

On the road
Posted by Jill | 10:30 AM
I take one day off from blogging, and look what I missed. Yesterday I spent the day driving to Chapel Hill, NC, where I'll be till Tuesday, when I head north to the CFUNITED conference in Bethesda.

It's an enjoyable ride, up until the last 60 miles, when I start wishing for Star Trek-style transporters. But I have to wonder about human nature, when, just as I got south of DC, I ran into no less than five bumper-to-bumper traffic jams, none of them due to lane closures, all of them due to rubbernecking, and only one of them due to an accident.

Why is it that we feel we need to stpo and gawk at a disabled vehicle because we think it might be an accident with some nice juicy carnage, but we can't handle images of the war dead on television?
Bookmark and Share

OK...explain this one
Posted by Jill | 10:17 AM
By the tiime the book on the Bush Administration and the 9/11 attacks is written, the conspiracy theorists will turn out to have been right:

Newly released documents reveal the FBI suspected that a plane hired to transport members of the bin Laden family from the United States back to Saudi Arabia might have been chartered by Osama bin Laden himself. The documents raise new questions about the FBI investigation into the 9/11 attacks.

Truthout reviewed the 224 pages of newly released documents over the past two days.

A heavily redacted FBI report on the incident begins by describing a private jet that was hired to pick up members of the bin Laden family that were in the US eight days after the 9/11 attacks. "The plane was chartered either by the Saudi Arabian Royal Family or Osama bin Laden," according to the declassified pages of the FBI investigation titled PENTTBOMB (page 3).

Subsequent references to the chartered flight in the released documents state that it was "chartered by the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Washington, DC" (page 106). The possibility that the flight was arranged or paid for by Osama bin Laden was not addressed again in the subsequent 221 pages released by the FBI.

The FBI report was prepared in response to an October 2003 Vanity Fair magazine article by Craig Unger which raised questions about the FBI procedures after 9/11 that allowed six planes of Middle Eastern nationals to fly out of the United States. Most of the people on these planes were members of the Saudi Royal family, the wealthy rulers of Saudi Arabia, who have high-level contacts with the Bush administration. One plane, Ryan International Flight 441, made four stops around the country on September 19, 2001 to pick up members of the bin Laden family. According to the FBI, these individuals were half-siblings or the children of half-siblings of Osama bin Laden with no connections to the international terrorist. Critics accuse the FBI and possibly the White House of being complicit in allowing individuals with direct connections to Osama bin Laden to flee the country after the attacks. The FBI maintains that their interviews, conducted primarily at airports right before the nationals were to board planes, were sufficient and did not garner any actionable intelligence or warrant the detention of any of the nationals.

A set of documents compiled by the FBI in 2003 sheds some light on the procedures the FBI followed prior to allowing the bin Laden family members and other Saudi nationals to leave the country in the weeks following 9/11. The documents also raise new questions.

An internal FBI email described the effort to collect and compile all of the information about the Saudi nationals. "The point of this mess is a sort of damage assessment of those people leaving the US" (page 136).

The documents were obtained by the conservative government watchdog group Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act. These documents had previously been released but all mention of Osama bin Laden and the bin Laden family were blacked-out by the FBI. After a protracted legal fight, these FBI redactions and their accompanying explanations were ruled unacceptable by a Washington, DC District Court judge, who ordered the FBI to reassess the redactions and re-release the report.

Judicial Watch made the re-released report public on Wednesday, with many of the blacked-out sections restored. All mention of Osama bin Laden or the bin Laden family were made readable, revealing the sentence stating that Osama bin Laden may have chartered the flight that collected members of the bin Laden family in the days following the attacks.


It has never made sense that there was no national outcry, or even an investigative report, about the connection between the Bush and Bin Laden families. One wonders what Fox News, or even CNN, would have done had Bill Clinton had the kind of connections with the Bin Ladens that Bush had. And now, if the controversial flight out of the country carrying members of the Bin Laden family following the 9/11 attacks turns out to have been chartered by the supposed "black sheep" of the family, it debunks the entire notion of Osama Bin Laden as being somehow unaffiliated with the rest of his family.

So why WAS George Herbert Walker Bush in a meeting with members of the Bin Laden family on the morning of the attacks anyway? And why WERE the Bin Laden family members allowed to leave the country? And if this plane was chartered by Osama Bin Laden, then put the pieces together. And once you do that, it it at all still possible to believe the official story?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, June 21, 2007

So...has the surge started yet?
Posted by Jill | 10:27 AM
Or does it only count as soon as things like this stop happening:

The U.S. military announced the deaths of 14 American troops, including five killed Thursday in a single roadside bombing that also killed four Iraqis in Baghdad.

Elsewhere in Iraq, a suicide truck bomber struck the Sulaiman Bek city hall in a predominantly Sunni area in northern Iraq, killing at least 13 people and wounding 70, an Iraqi commander said.
[snip]

The deadliest attack was a roadside bomb that struck a convoy in northeastern Baghdad on Thursday, killing five U.S. soldiers, three Iraqi civilians and one Iraqi interpreter, the military said.

A rocket-propelled grenade struck a vehicle in northern Baghdad about 12:30 p.m. Thursday, killing one soldier and wounding three others, another statement said.

Four other U.S. soldiers were killed and one was wounded Wednesday when their convoy was struck by a roadside bomb in a western neighborhood in the capital, the military said separately.

Southwest of Baghdad, two U.S. soldiers were killed and four were wounded Wednesday when explosions struck near their vehicle, according to a statement earlier in the day.

Two Marines also were killed Wednesday while conducting combat operations in Anbar province, west of Baghdad, the military said.

Bomber hits mayor’s office; 10 dead
Earlier, a suicide truck bomber struck a mayor’s office in northern Iraq, killing at least 10 people and wounding 40, an Iraqi commander said. Meanwhile, a barrage of mortar bombs hit Baghdad’s heavily fortified Green Zone, according to Reuters reporters.

The explosion in the north of the country, which occurred about 10:30 a.m. in the predominantly Sunni Arab town of Sulaiman Bek, caused part of the government building to collapse and destroyed at least four vehicles at the site, said Brig. Gen. Anwar Hamah, commander of the Iraqi army’s 2nd Brigade.

Hamah said at least 10 people were killed and 40 were wounded but he expected the casualty toll to rise as people were pulled from the rubble.

In Baghdad, several plumes of smoke could be seen rising near buildings housing the Iraqi parliament and government offices.

On the other side of the river Tigris, a thick plume of black smoke could be seen near the area where a suicide truck bomb partly demolished a Shiite mosque and killed 87 people on Tuesday. The origin of the smoke was not immediately known.

Slamming mortars

At least seven mortar rounds could be heard slamming into the Green Zone, which houses many Iraqi government ministries as well as the U.S., British and other Western embassies.

It was unclear if there were any casualties.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Gee, ya think?
Posted by Jill | 7:34 AM
What a shock: WaPo is reporting that Bradley Schlozman filled jobs based on candidates' political leanings.

Are we going to just have investigations, or are the Democrats going to actually do something about the Justice Department being revamped as the policy action wing of the Republican Party:

Karen Stevens, Tovah Calderon and Teresa Kwong had a lot in common. They had good performance ratings as career lawyers in the Justice Department's civil rights division. And they were minority women transferred out of their jobs two years ago -- over the objections of their immediate supervisors -- by Bradley Schlozman, then the acting assistant attorney general for civil rights.

Schlozman ordered supervisors to tell the women that they had performance problems or that the office was overstaffed. But one lawyer, Conor Dugan, told colleagues that the recent Bush appointee had confided that his real motive was to "make room for some good Americans" in that high-impact office, according to four lawyers who said they heard the account from Dugan.

[snip]

Schlozman's efforts to hire political conservatives for career jobs throughout the division are now being examined as part of a wide-ranging investigation of the Bush administration's alleged politicization of the Justice Department. The department's inspector general and Office of Professional Responsibility confirmed last month that their inquiry, begun in March, will look at hiring, firing and legal-case decisions in the division.

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee plan today to shine a renewed spotlight on decision-making in the division by questioning Schlozman's replacement, Wan Kim, about hiring practices and about its support for state voter-identification programs that could inhibit minority voting.

Democrats also plan to ask about the dwindling diversity of the staff in a division whose core mission includes fighting racial discrimination. The Bush administration, largely under Schlozman, hired seven members as replacements or additions to the 14-lawyer appellate section where Stevens, Calderon and Kwong worked. They included six whites, one Asian and no African Americans.


Schlozman, who really needs to learn how to speak without the helium, is like Karl Rove's mini-me. Can you recall ever seeing a more loathsome bunch of people than those in this Administration?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Compassionate Conservatism
Posted by Jill | 7:16 AM
There. Are. No. Words:

While the U.S. military searches for a soldier missing in Iraq, kidnapped by insurgents possibly allied with al Qaeda, his wife back home in Massachusetts may be deported by the U.S. government.

Army Spec. Alex Jimenez, who has been missing since his unit was attacked by insurgents in Iraq on May 12, had petitioned for a green card for his wife, Yaderlin Hiraldo, whom he married in 2004.

Their attorney, Matthew Kolken, said 23-year-old Hiraldo illegally entered the United States in 2001 to reunite with her husband, whom she had met in her native Dominican Republic and later married at his New York State Army base in 2004.

Her husband's request for a green card and legal residence status for his wife alerted authorities to her status, Kolken said.

She now faces deportation, reports CBS station WBZ correspondent Beth Germano, and would be barred from applying for a green card for 10 years.

Her attorney is seeking a hardship waiver, which so far the government won't grant.


Of course writing about this is exactly the same as being obsessed with Bill and Hillary Clinton, right?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Wow...playin' with the Kool Kidz
Posted by Jill | 6:35 AM
So does this mean I get invited to the Kool Kidz lunch table now? (And do I even WANT to?)

After being on the sidelines of most of the more interesting blog fraci, I am now in the pool, thanks to Ann Althouse deciding that my little 600-page-views-a-day bloggie warrants a visit from someone of her Exalted Status® in response to my snarky musing in this post yesterday, in which I relied on the old Yiddish "needs a schtup" construct as a facile and sarcastic way of attempting to explain what TRex so vividly refers to as Althouse's "Clinton Derangement Syndrome."

Now, I do think that much of the problem with the Christofascist Zombie Brigade is their antipathy towards Teh Sex, which is as far as I'm concerned the main reason why they end up running reform schools in which abuse is part of the "treatment", or setting themselves up as egg harvesters from teenage girls, or as any variety of sex offender. I'm not saying that Althouse is a card-carrying member of the Christofascist Zombie Brigade, but when I read that onion rings symbolize the vagina, or that carrot sticks are a phallic symbol, I have to wonder just what the deal is.

Of course, since wingnuts never let their complete and utter lack of a sense of irony stand in the way of salivating over what they see as a catfight, our own resident troll, Barry, gets in on the fun -- with the predictable reptilian responses from his commenters, who opine that being appalled at a president who lies us into war and systematically destroys the middle class is somehow analogous to obsessing about another president's sex life.

I'm sure that Barry is envisioning some sort of Amazonian catfight, perhaps in spandex and leather with studs and push-up bras, but I have to dash that notion -- my figure, when combined with spandex and leather, is NOT the stuff of which fantasies are made.

Meanwhile, in an echo of the Infamous Jessica Valenti How Dare She Wear Her Breasts to a Lunch with Bill Clinton fracas, TRex reports that La Althouse is now trying to defuse the controversy with levity. Too bad she didn't do this before trashing Jessica Valenti all over the Toobz. I mean, if you're going to talk about women bringing their sex characteristics with them, at least be clever about it. Wanda shows how it's done:





UPDATE: Now all's right with the universe, because Jon Swift has weighed in.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, June 20, 2007

These are the people with whom Zionists have decided are their allies
Posted by Jill | 8:13 PM
Why on earth any Jew, no matter how Zionist, would think that the Christofascist Zombie Brigade is their friend, is a mystery.

Christian support of Israel is based on one thing: conversion or annihilation of the Jews.

Cernig uncovered this little tidbit from Jesusland that explains it all:

Prophecy continues to unfold. The Bible has warned about Middle East turmoil increasing "in the latter times."

In Ezekiel 36-39, God speaks of bringing Jews from around the world to Israel, not because they deserve their own land but to vindicate His holy name. They besmirched deity's holy name by repeatedly sinning over centuries; but God will not tolerate His holiness smeared without vindication, hence Jews gravitating to Israel "in the end times."

So look to the divine miracle: May 14, 1948, when Israel became a nation for the first time in centuries. Jews from all over the globe went to Israel, their homeland.

Ezekiel predicted Israel's flourishing: herds, flocks, fruitage, ruined cities rebuilt.

With Israel having settled in, however, biblical predictions go on to state that the enemies surrounding Israel attack Jews mercilessly. Blood flows like rivers.

Natural calamities come also upon Israel, convincing Jews and Gentiles alike that God is God and that His holiness must be recognized.

At the close of the Church Age — "in the latter days" — Israel will then come under the blessing of the returned Messiah Christ's peace.


This is with who Joe Lieberman and William Kristol and Paul Wolfowitz and the rest of the Jewish neocons break bread. This is whom they think are "friends of Israel."

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Digby Unleashed!!
Posted by Jill | 7:58 PM
I found out quite a while ago that Digby is, in fact female, and it was a surprise, for I, like most people, just assumed Digby was a man. I'm not sure why; maybe it's because Digby doesn't post through a female prism the way most female bloggers, including myself, do. Or maybe it's the screaming Howard Beale image on her blog side banner. Or maybe it's just that if there was ever a blogger who came across as gender-neutral, it's Digby.

With the loss of Steve Gilliard, Digby and Driftglass are, from where I'm sitting, the smartest and best political writers on the web -- not that they weren't before, but with the Holy Trinity of Blogtopia (® Skippy) now diminished by one, we need them even more.

Again, I'm not trying to diss anyone else out there. Every blog I put on my blogroll is there for a reason, and I read all of them regularly.

As a middle-aged blogger, I often feel like the creepy old person playing in the kids' sandbox. Maya's Granny might disagree, but she occupies a niche all her own, while I sit here on the outskirts of the Kool Kidz Klub looking in -- a place where I occupy just about every aspect of my life, as a matter of fact. But while the political blogging sandbox isn't, contrary to popular belief, occupied by today's version of the antiwar marchers of the 60's, it's still a bastion of thirtysomething.

So when like most bloggers, I went to Google Video to see for myself Digby's amazing speech at the Take Back America conference accepting the Paul Wellstone award, imagine my delight to see that Digby is not just one hell of a public speaker and someone whom we can all be proud to have as a public face, but is also another wise woman of years.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

The company they keep
Posted by Jill | 4:46 PM
You've got to love those moral values Republicans. From so-called pastors involved in sexual abuse to Rudy's Bible Belt campaign chair being a coke dealer -- I'm beginning to understand why they NEED Jehovah -- because without a Big Daddy deity to make them afraid and a good, forgiving Jesus to wash away their disgusting, foul, vile, inhuman perversities -- sins that ONLY religious wingnuts seem to commit -- they'd probably slit their own throats from having to live in their own heads.

Now the Mittster has one too:

In a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 133 plaintiffs have alleged that Robert Lichfield, co-chairman of Romney’s Utah finance committee owned or operated residential boarding schools for troubled teenagers where students were “subjected to physical abuse, emotional abuse and sexual abuse.”

The complaint, which plaintiffs amended and resubmitted to the court last week, alleges children attending schools operated by Lichfield suffered abuses such as unsanitary living conditions; denial of adequate food; exposure to extreme temperatures; beatings; confinement in dog cages; and sexual fondling.

A second lawsuit filed by more than 25 plaintiffs in July in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of New York alleges that Lichfield and several partners entered into a scheme to defraud them by operating an unlicensed boarding school in upstate New York. The suit does not allege physical or emotional abuse.

These are two active lawsuits against Lichfield. Several others suits have alleged child abuse on behalf of dozens of plaintiffs, but judges have thrown out the suits for procedural reasons. As a result, the merits of the allegations have not been weighed. In some suits, plaintiffs have settled their cases for undisclosed amounts of money.

The allegations could force Romney to re-examine his relationship with his Utah finance co-chairman or put pressure on him to give away the contributions Lichfield helped raise.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

But as long as gay people aren't getting married and women aren't having abortions, that makes it all OK.
Posted by Jill | 7:27 AM
Via Americablog comes this report on just how badly the red-staters who have been reliably voting Republican are getting screwed:

A new study released this week revealed that Americans' health care varies dramatically from state to state. It should come as no surprise that in general Southern states ranked at the bottom in almost every category. After all, whether the issue is health, education, working conditions, or virtually any indicator of social pathology, things are worst in precisely those states that voted for George W. Bush.


The Commonwealth Fund report, "Aiming Higher: Results from a State Scorecard on Health System Performance," examined states' performance across 32 indicators of health care access, quality, outcomes and hospital use. Topping the list were Hawaii, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. Bringing up the rear were the Bush bastions of Kentucky, Louisiana, Nevada, Arkansas, Texas, with Mississippi and Oklahoma. The 10 worst performing states were all solidly Republican in 2004.


The extremes in health care performance are startling. For example, 30% of adults and 20% of children in Texas lacked health insurance, compared to 11% in Minnesota and 5% in Vermont, respectively. Premature death rates from preventable conditions were almost double (141.7 per 100,000 people) in Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana and Mississippi compared to the top performing states (74.1 per 100,000). Adults over 50 receiving preventative care topped 50% in Minnesota compared to only 33% in Idaho. Childhood immunizations reached 94% in Massachusetts, compared to just 75% in the bottom five states. As the report details, federal and state policies, such as insurance requirements and Medicaid incentives, clearly impact health care outcomes.


[snip]

But health care isn't the only area where denizens of the Republican heartland suffer relative to their blue state brethren. As Perrspectives detailed in January, minimum wage levels also vary significantly from state to state. Unsurprisingly, many of the "bluest" states lead the way in exceeding both the previous ($5.15 an hour) and recently passed ($7.25) federal requirements, with Washington, Oregon, California, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut mandating wages as high as $7.93. Only one of the 21 states (New Hampshire) mired at $5.15 an hour voted for George W. Bush in 2004. (Click here to view a map of the minimum wage by state.)


And the minimum wage is just the beginning. A December 2005 report Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts showed that Americans' working conditions in general closely follow the 2004 electoral map. The report's Work Environment Index (WEI) rated the quality of Americans' working lives by a weighting of three factors: job opportunities, job quality, and job fairness. The top five states were Delaware, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Vermont and Iowa, the bottom five were South Carolina, Utah, Arkansas Texas and Louisiana. Unsurprisingly, all five of the cellar-dwellers are so-called "Right-to-Work" states featuring outright hostility towards union organizing. (Click the following links for maps of WEI by state and right-to-work states.)




More here.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

This is clever and funny, but is it a good idea?
Posted by Jill | 6:48 AM
Something tells me that Steve Perry had better enjoy it while he can, because the number of Sopranos Finale parodies is going to wear thin very quickly.

But until that happens, I can't decide whether to give props to Hillary Clinton's ad people for coming up with this, or if it's a really dumb move:





I especially like the way the video shows the interaction between Bill and Hill. Every marriage has its own dynamic, and it's clear that whatever the problems they've had, this couple has a very intense and affectionate bond that transcends all of their marital strife. I also like the way it "Homer Simpsonizes" Bill Clinton. He is the 800-pound gorilla (cue the wingnuts who come here from Memeorandum and Real Clear Politics to post about his weight battles in the comments) who sits over the entire party, let alone this campaign, and while Hillary ordering carrot sticks because of Bill's inclination to the fried and the fatty may make the phallus-worshippers quiver with anxiety about Hillary's Terrible Penis Knife, I think it's effective in underscoring just who is the candidate here. And the presence of Vincent "Johnny Sack" Curatola to play the guy in the Members Only jacket is hilarious.

But a note to the campaign: are you guys really sure that you want to associate a candidate who, along with her ex-president spouse, has been accused by the must wingnut segments of wingnuttia of murdering forty-seven people, with Tony Soprano? There's something rather delightfully cheeky about tweaking this kind of nuttiness by doing so, but does this defuse the Clinton Conspiracies lunatics, or will this just trigger another round of elevating a couple that are still regarded inside the Beltway as rubes who don't belong as being the most Machiavellian duo in history?

At the very least, it provided the opportunity for Maureen Dowd to unsheath her claws again. I guess Bill never made a pass at her and she's still angry. I'm about as far from being a Hillary Clinton supporter as it's possible to be without an "R" after one's name, but every time Dowd does this kind of hatchet job I wonder if I should reconsider. Even if the Journey song "Don't Stop Believing" played in the show's finale would be far more appropriate, and at least marginally less horrible, than the Celine Dion shrei-fest she actually chose. Now I'll grant MoDo that one: Anyone choosing anything that comes out of Celine Dion's mouth as a campaign song by definition has questionable judgment.

(UPDATE: MoDo isn't the only one. Via TRex at FDL comes, right on cue, teh lunacy from Ann Althouse, Clinton obsessive de luxe. You know, I work in a building full of shrinks, most of whom are pretty liberal. There is a car with a "Stewart/Colbert '08 or the Terrorists Win" bumper sticker in the parking lot. And I don't think one of them would make the Freudian connections that Althouse does. Another one who's pissed because Bill never made a pass at her.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Another good, law-abiding moral Republican
Posted by Jill | 8:02 PM
This one's a cocaine dealer. And he's Rudy Giuliani's South Carolina campaign chairman.

(Via the ever-vigilant Josh Marshall.)

That's the same "law and order" Rudy Giuliani who calls the jail sentence given Scooter Libby by a judge who's a Bush appointee "grossly excessive."

This is such an entertaining evening I'm thinking I don't dare go to sleep.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Hey Fred Thompson, don't start picking out drapes just yet
Posted by Jill | 7:40 PM
The 2008 presidential race is barely underway and I'm already depressed. After vascillating back and forth between Barack Obama and John Edwards about fifty times, I keep coming back to John Edwards, although I still have some nagging distrust of his metamorphosis from Southern Dream Democrat to populist, and he hasn't given me that "YES!! This is the guy!!" feeling that I had the first time I saw Howard Dean on Press the Meat in late 2003. As for Obama, I'm finding that he doesn't wear very well. His campaign staff seems inexperienced, and I'm still seeing a cautious, creeping Joe Liebermanism to him that bothers me. And the thought of another Clinton administration, particularly one run by Hillary the Warhawk, makes me want to stick an icepick in my own forehead.

So unlike much of the political blogosphere, which is at least giving lip service to being just THRILLED with our choices (and of course compared to the pantysniffers and bloodbathers that constitute the Republican field, anyone would look good), I have been facing the 2008 campaign with more dread than excitement.

But today things look if not better, at least more interesting, because New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is leaving the GOP and registering as in independent:

New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday switched his party status from Republican to unaffiliated, a stunning move certain to be seen as a prelude to an independent presidential bid that would upend the 2008 race.

The billionaire former CEO, who was a lifelong Democrat before he switched to the GOP for his first mayoral run, said the change in voter registration does not mean he is running for president.

"Although my plans for the future haven't changed, I believe this brings my affiliation into alignment with how I have led and will continue to lead our city," he said in a statement.


Since he hasn't really talked about his plans for the future, this sure looks like a fairly significant toe being dipped into the 2008 waters.

At the very least, an independent Bloomberg candidacy would be interesting. Rudy Giuliani has crowned himself the King of 9/11, but it's this diminutive little billionaire Jewish guy who did the heavy lifting of bringing the city back. Bloomberg is pro-choice, favors stem cell research and gun control, and while you may not like some of his ideas, like ridding the city's restaurants of trans fats and smoking, or his new congestion pricing plan for the city's bridges and tunnels, you can't say the man isn't capable of thinking out of the box.

Conventional wisdom would indicate that a guy with this kind of record would pull more from Democratic than from Republican voters. But Republicans this time out don't seem enamored of ANY of their candidates, which is why the dour, lazy, and intellectually lacking Fred Thompson is now leading the Republican pack. With McCain in free-fall, Giuliani sounding more and more fascist every day, and Christian conservatives uncomfortable at the thought of supporting a Mormon, Thompson is the blank slate on which Republicans can paint their vision of their party's future -- or more accurately, its past. But once he throws his hat into the ring, the fact that Fred Thompson is a dumbass will become as clear as day to all but the most deluded kool-aid drinkers.

All this is of course why a Bloomberg candidacy would be so intriguing. He doesn't have to worry about money; he could put a billion dollars into his campaign and not have to give up so much as a manicure. He has a business record that makes Mitt Romney look like the proprietor of a lemonade stand. His social issues stands made even Rachel Maddow and David Bender giddy on this evening's Rachel Maddow Show. And he's not a nut or egomaniac spoiler like Ross Perot or Ralph Nader. If Bloomberg gets in it, he's in it to win it.

There is a lot to dislike about Bloomberg. His elitism and insensitivity during the December 2005 transit strike was appalling, and it's hard to imagine him representing Americans who are not of Wall Street. It's even harder to imagine him coming up with a plan for universal health insurance and health care that doesn't involve shoveling a shitload of money into the pockets of United Healthcare and Bill Frist's hospitals.

But I have to tell you, this is one staunch progressive that if the Democrats nominate Hillary Clinton, will give Bloomberg some heavy consideration. I may not vote for him, but I'd certainly give him a look.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

So...are Democrats ignoring information given them by IT experts, or has someone just not told them?
Posted by Jill | 6:44 AM
It's time someone gave Democrats a lesson in what happens to e-mails when they are deleted.

Rob Pegoraro, WaPo's IT columnist, explained it back in April:

The secret life of e-mail isn't obvious from looking at your mail program. It sensibly simplifies things, presenting a message as a single object you can open, read, and then delete. Once you empty your mail program's trash, no trace of the message remains.

But under normal circumstances, nothing you delete on a computer vanishes immediately. The computer clears its own record of where it put the file, but the file itself won't disappear until enough other data gets written to that same spot. Given the vast size of most new computers' hard drives, that can take years.

The same thing happens with theoretically erased e-mail. Most mail programs don't store each message as its own separate document; instead, they squirrel away all your messages in one database file. When you hit the delete key, your mail program can just update its internal records to mark that message's location as vacant. You could say it conveniently forgets about the e-mail.

You can try specialized software that can overwrite a deleted file to prevent later retrieval -- for example, the Eraser program for Windows and Mac OS X's "Secure Empty Trash" option -- but those products may not work inside an e-mail program's database.

E-mail also leaves a long trail as it hops from computer to computer across the Internet. Most of the copies aren't kept, but at the receiving end, at least two can stick around: one on the mail server that delivers new messages to each user's computer, the other on the user's own machine.

So even if both the sender and recipient strive to make a message disappear, "data forensics" companies can dig it up. Brian Karney, the director of product management for one such firm, Guidance Software of Pasadena, Calif., bragged about how easy it is to unearth a long-buried message from the database file created by Microsoft Outlook -- the software used by many businesses and organizations, including the White House.

"Anybody can recover an e-mail," Karney said. "You just need to know how to look and find that stuff."


The House Oversight Committee gives little indication that it understands or is willing to do what's necessary to recover the e-mails by White House officials that have been deleted from RNC servers:

There are several next steps that should be pursued in the investigation into the use of RNC e-mail accounts by White House officials. First, the records of federal agencies should be examined to assess whether they may contain some of the White House e-mails that have been destroyed by the RNC. The Committee has already written to 25 federal agencies to inquire about the e-mail records they may have retained from White House officials who used RNC and Bush Cheney ’04 e-mail accounts. Preliminary responses from the agencies indicate that they may have preserved official communications that were destroyed by the RNC.

Second, the Committee should investigate what former White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales knew about the use of political e-mail accounts by White House officials. If Susan Ralston’s testimony to the Committee is accurate, there is evidence that Mr. Gonzales or counsels working in his office knew in 2001 that Karl Rove was using his RNC e-mail account to communicate about official business, but took no action to preserve Mr. Rove’s official communications.

Third, the Committee may need to issue compulsory process to obtain the cooperation of the Bush Cheney ’04 campaign. The campaign has informed the Committee that it provided e-mail accounts to 11 White House officials, but the campaign has unjustifiably refused to provide the Committee with basic information about these accounts, such as the identity of the White House officials and the number of e-mails that have been preserved.


I'm sure that someone has already gone after the hard drives in question with a sledgehammer, but just on the off chance that the RNC has no tech guys who understand that any e-mail can be retrieved, the Committee ought to be impounding those hard drives at once.

There is a great deal of technical talent in the blogosphere. One would think that Nancy Pelosi or John Conyers or Henry Waxman would make use of some of them to recover these e-mail from these drives. Unless, of course, they don't want to....

(h/t: Cernig)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Protecting the "life" of the fetus, but when you're a real live child, you're on your own
Posted by Jill | 6:40 AM
This is "pro-life" Republicanism in action:

You won’t see these stories on television, but Marian Wright Edelman and Dr. Irwin Redlener could talk to you all day and all night about children whose lives have been lost or ruined because they didn’t have health insurance.

This is not a situation one associates with a so-called advanced country. That you can have sick children wasting away in the United States, the wealthiest nation on the planet, because medical treatment that could relieve their suffering is withheld by men and women with dollar signs instead of compassion in their eyes is beyond unconscionable.

Ms. Edelman is the president of the Children’s Defense Fund, and Dr. Redlener is president of the Children’s Health Fund.

Both are appalled at the embarrassing fact that nine million American children have no health coverage at all. Among them are children with diabetes, chronic asthma, heart conditions, life-threatening allergies and so on. In many instances they are left untreated until it is too late.

Leaving children uninsured is a form of Russian roulette, Dr. Redlener said.

“All children should be covered,” said Ms. Edelman.

[snip]

The Congressional Budget Office and most researchers have agreed on the six million figure for the number of youngsters who are eligible for government-sponsored health coverage but remain unenrolled — roughly four million for Medicaid and two million for S-chip. This has not been controversial.

Yesterday, the Department of Health and Human Services began circulating a study that tries to make the case that the total number of eligible but uninsured youngsters is a mere 794,000, an absurdly low figure.

If you can wave a magic wand and make five million poor kids disappear, you no longer have to think about caring for them.

Advocates like Dr. Redlener and Ms. Edelman don’t have that luxury.

“Kids who grow up with poor access to health care carry a high risk of having underdiagnosed and undertreated chronic illness, both physical and emotional,” said Dr. Redlener. “We know what to do. We should fully fund this effort at the $50 billion level and make coverage mandatory for all children.”

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

So we fought 'em over there and they followed us home anyway
Posted by Jill | 5:58 AM
I thought the whole point of endless war in Iraq was to feed terrorists an endless supply of American soldiers to kill so they wouldn't come here and kill civilians.

Well, if this report is correct, they're here anyway.

Brian Ross reports:

Large teams of newly trained suicide bombers are being sent to the United States and Europe, according to evidence contained on a new videotape obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com.

Teams assigned to carry out attacks in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Germany were introduced at an al Qaeda/Taliban training camp graduation ceremony held June 9.

A Pakistani journalist was invited to attend and take pictures as some 300 recruits, including boys as young as 12, were supposedly sent off on their suicide missions.

[snip]

U.S. intelligence officials described the event as another example of "an aggressive and sophisticated propaganda campaign."

Others take it very seriously.

"It doesn't take too many who are willing to actually do it and be able to slip through the net and get into the United States or England and cause a lot of damage," said ABC News consultant Richard Clarke, the former White House counterterrorism official.


Let's assume for a moment that this report is true and that there are suicide bombers that have been dispatched to the U.S. to carry out attacks. For six years, we've been told that only Republicans can keep us safe. For six years we've been at war in the Middle East, squandering lives and money and America's financial future. Americans have sat by like sheep while this Administration played on our fears of another 9/11 to tap our phones, monitor our e-mail and Web searches, strip-searched old ladies with hip replacements before they can board airplanes, and tried to disenfranchise those who would recognize that they have done a great deal to make us less free and nothing effective to keep us safer from terrorists.

And now that Americans have finally woken up and begun to realize just what they have given up to a bunch of criminals because they were traumatized on that day in September, suddenly we have terrorists that have already been dispatched to the U.S. If this story is true, all that money, all that surveillance, all that war, all those corpses, have been for naught -- twelve-year-olds are now here in a supposedly great nation with the biggest military in the world to commit Israel-style suicide bombings

If there are suicide bombers in this country, and just on the off-chance that all of this surveillance actually manages to track them, you can bet your life that this Administration will make sure that corporate leaders and other important Republicans will know where and when they are going to take place -- so they can stay away. For the rest of us, well, we're going to be just so many extras in the Administration's apocalyptic war movie and it'll be time to fire up the popcorn in the White House microwave, because for the bunch of incompetent fearmongers that both run this country and that aspire to the Republican nomination, terrorist attacks on our soil will mean that happy days are here again.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Must read IMHO
Know Iraq policy.

This is a must read above all other must reads.

Perhaps a MUST, must read?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Monday, June 18, 2007

This is what happens when you skip Skippy for a day...
Posted by Jill | 11:59 AM
You miss stuff like this:

The US is considering introducing a limited military draft if it is to keep its present force levels in Iraq and Afghanistan, Pentagon advisers have warned British colleagues. Next month, US forces in Iraq will peak at around 170,000, and GIs in the new units are being told they could be on operations for at least 15 months.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Whatever happened to the anthrax investigation, anyway?
Posted by Jill | 7:04 AM

And why on earth would anyone want to threaten Sam Champion? Aside from the fact that the Handsome Weatherman looks like he's had some not-great plastic surgery, what on earth could someone's beef with him possibly be?

A portion of a sixth-floor ABC News office housing "Good Morning America" was closed down for five hours Friday afternoon after an employee found a letter containing an unidentified white powder.

A portion of a floor in the building at 147 Columbus Ave. was shut down after 1 p.m. when the unnamed employee found the letter. Addressed to "Good Morning America" weatherman Sam Champion, the letter mentioned anthrax.

The area was sealed off, with employees still there, as police and hazardous-material specialists scoured the area and worked to identify the suspicious substance that had been sent with the letter. Initial tests on the substance were negative for anthrax, and the all-clear was given to return around 6 p.m.

ABC News said police were questioning a "person of interest" in connection with the case. The news organization said that "Good Morning America" operations would resume Friday and continue throughout the weekend. Even though tests for anthrax came back negative, the area would be thoroughly cleaned.


Actually, it's not as ridiculous as it sounds. New York is due to have two hot days this week, and who knows what kind of offhand remarks Champion may have made about global warming.

The "politicization of weather" is one of Wingnuttia's latest pet grievances. The flat-earthers specifically target their ire at the Weather Channel.

Here's what El Rushbo had to say about the Weather Channel being a subversive commie liberal media outlet in January of this year:

They've turned it now into a political cable channel with this mess. “Many of you have accused me and the Weather Channel of taking a political position on global warming. It's not our intention.” Who cares about your intentions, the result is that you have. The reality is you've taken a political position because this is a political issue. It has not been settled by science. Our goal at the Weather Channel has always been to keep people out of harm's way. How you gonna keep 'em out of harm's way on global warming? There's nothing we can do about it. That's the big little secret, there's nothing we can do about it, and even some of these global warming scientists have been saying for 20 years, “It's too late! It's too late!” Who's to say if it is warming, manmade or not, that it's all bad?


But still -- why Sam Champion? Of course no one ever accused these folks of having a large amount of grey matter, so it would not surprise me if some nut couldn't tell the difference between one weatherbot and another.
Bookmark and Share

Where are you going to get the troops, General?
Posted by Jill | 6:13 AM
In case there was anyone who still believed a word out of this Administration's collective mouth, the "surge" is turning out to be "throw money down a black hole in Iraq in perpetuity":

Conditions in Iraq will not improve sufficiently by September to justify a drawdown of U.S. military forces, the top commander in Iraq said yesterday.

Asked whether he thought the job assigned to an additional 30,000 troops deployed as the centerpiece of President Bush's new war strategy would be completed by then, Gen. David H. Petraeus replied: "I do not, no. I think that we have a lot of heavy lifting to do."

Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker, his diplomatic counterpart in Baghdad, said a key report they will deliver to Washington in September will include what Crocker called "an assessment of what the consequences might be if we pursue other directions." Noting the "unhelpful roles" being played by Iran and Syria in Iraq, Crocker said: "We've got to consider what could happen."

Comments by Petraeus on "Fox News Sunday" and Crocker on NBC's "Meet the Press" were an indication of the administration's evolving strategy for confronting rising congressional demands to begin planning troop withdrawals. In addition to warning about the possible regional consequences of withdrawal, both men emphasized a "mixed" picture on the ground, citing successes while acknowledging the difficulty of the task ahead.

Asserting steady, albeit slow, military and political progress, Petraeus said that the "many, many challenges" would not be resolved "in a year or even two years." Similar counterinsurgency operations, he said, citing Britain's experience in Northern Ireland, "have gone at least nine or 10 years." He said he and Crocker would make "some recommendations on the way ahead" to Congress, and that it was realistic to assume "some form of long-term security arrangement" with Iraq.


Nice work for someone who's not supposed to be a politician. He prepares the American public for the fact that this so-called "surge" isn't temporary at all, but is instead an escalation of the occupation of Iraq, and also warns of dire consequences of pursuing "other directions." And here we thought the military wasn't just another political arm of the Republican party. But since the Justice Department is, why NOT the military? Yesterday Petraus gave ol Crying John Boehner and the rest of the warmongers in Congress exactly what they needed to get on the floor of the House and Senate in September and once again wax all lachrymose about "When are we gonna get 'em?"

When indeed.

And who is "'em" anyway? Roger Cohen of the International Herald Tribune believes that George W. Bush decided to use Iraq to try to resolve his psychological issues with his father, he unleashed demons that may never be vanquished:

The Iraqi conflict is going to be with us for years if not decades. The country has become the focus of a crisis of Islamic civilization that is closer to its onset than its conclusion. Violent conflict between the now dominant Shiite community and Sunnis nostalgic for power is but one aspect of this epochal upheaval.

As in the Palestinian territories, the Iraqi struggle has been complicated by the presence of forces driven not by national goals but by the global objectives of jihadist Islamism. These jihadists, finding inspiration in their reading of the sacred texts of Islam, have embarked on a holy war against the West.

It is against such fanatics, some of whom call themselves Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, that General David Petraeus, the top American commander in Iraq, has just announced a major offensive. I wish Petraeus and the 155,000 troops now in Iraq luck, but I am not hopeful.

The fact is that however many bomb makers are taken out, however many cells broken, the social and religious forces driving angry young men across the Muslim world into this sort of fight are not about to abate.

A population explosion is pushing these men into societies with few jobs and scant hope for the future beyond a range of causes - from Palestine to Iraq to the perceived debauchery of modernity - capable of drawing them into a consoling, if nihilistic, zealotry.

Against this reality, exacerbated in Iraq by the whirlwind fragmentation that often occurs in multi-ethnic societies when the lid of despotism is lifted, America's September deadline for measuring the progress achieved by the addition of 30,000 troops looks almost comical.

Let's face it folks, things are not going to be measurably better in Iraq by September. They may be about the same; they could be worse. The destructive energy disaggregating the country is still building. Wars tend to end when their participants are exhausted. We are not there yet, not even close.


The question, then is from whence the troops for this endless occupation of Iraq will come, after Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani or Fred Thompson becomes president (as they will, because Chris Matthews will extol their manliness while either Clinton scandals or veiled racism directed at Barack Obama or resentment of John Edwards managing to be wealthy but not a greedy scumbag will scuttle any Democratic hopes of winning the presidency). Will the existing troops do fourth and fifth and sixth and seventh tours? Will the mentally ill and the wounded and felons be recruited? Or will the entire effort be privatized, even further bankrupting the country?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, June 17, 2007

Around the blogroll and elsewhere -- and a word of advice
Posted by Jill | 3:10 PM
Driftglass on Republican Treasonal Affective Disorder.

Matt Stoller and Chris Bowers explain why saying any Democrat is better than any Republican and telling other bloggers they suck just doesn't work for them anymore.

Cernig on the Neocon Bait and Switch.

ShortWoman on a bunch of stuff, including a link to AN ENTIRE BLOG DEVOTED TO NORMAL-SIZED PEOPLE!!

This afternoon I found a bunch of photos from our trip to the late and lamented Enchanted Garden in Ocho Rios about five years ago. This amazing place, which alas is no longer open and has been in Jamaican Tax Hell for years now, had an aviary where you could go in and feed the birds. And since there was a photo of conures eating out of my hand, I figured I'd check in on our Official B@B Parroteer. Today Melina just posted a short post and link back to me, which seemed awfully self-serving to link to. But yesterday she wrote about Karl Rove, the retirement of Bob Barker, and Tech Support Hell. And oh yeah -- parrots. And an Elvis Costello song embedded in there somewhere.

How many of THESE things have you told yourself while dieting?

Anyone who lives in this God-forsaken level of reality won't be surprised to find out that the planet named after the Goddess of Discord is bigger than the one that shares its name with a dumbass Walt Disney dog.

Live Nude Modfab! Well, not nude, but live -- at the Knitting Factory in New York City, Tuesday evening at 6 PM.

The day that 40-plus-year-old women can appear in TV series without Botox is the day we can celebrate. Archcrone deconstructs Alessandra Stanley's article in today's New York Times Arts and Leisure section.

Oh, good Lord. The intrepid Pam wades through the sewer of Wingnuttia -- and reports on how out there in Toontown, women's demands are why men leave and create single-parent homes.

Now, here's the advice: If you're attaching cove molding to old REALLY HARD solid pine cabinets, GET A FUCKING NAIL GUN. Don't do what I did and try to hammer in ordinary nails. Or you too will end up ordering edge veneer and hoping it's a) the same color; and b) hides the bumps left from bent nails in the molding.

AARRGGGHHH...

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Utterly Shameless
Posted by Jill | 1:16 PM
This bunch in the executive branch really does see itself as above the law.

It looks like the spineless Democrats are going to allow Gonzo to dodge a proverbial bullet and keep his job, so what's his reaction to investigations into his politicizing the Justice Department?

To politicize the Justice Department even further:

Gonzales described what he delicately calls "a more vigorous and a little bit more formal process" for annually evaluating prosecutors. What that means, as he explained it, is hauling in every U.S. attorney for a meeting to hear, among other things, politicians' beefs against the prosecutor.

If that should happen, expect the fair-mindedness and independence Americans still count on from their Justice Department to slip.

In testimony to Congress and comments at the National Press Club, Gonzales framed the meetings as a way of improving communications. But it also looks a lot like a way to remind recalcitrant U.S. attorneys what the home team expects.

On Friday, a spokesman for Gonzales insisted in a written statement that the attorney general has no intention of holding one-on-ones with every U.S. attorney.

"The view of the overwhelming majority of U.S. attorneys is that they do not want a new, formalized review process -- including one that might involve annual one-on-one meetings between each U.S. attorney and the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General. We have listened and agree with these views," the spokesman said.

But later Friday a senior Justice Department official said one-on-one meetings are still on the table. "We haven't ruled that out," the official said.

Here's what Gonzales told the House Judiciary Committee last month about what he would do to avoid another uproar in the event he wants to fire more prosecutors:

"At least once a year every United States attorney is going to sit down with either myself or the deputy attorney general, and we're going to have a very candid conversation about issues and problems in their districts," Gonzales said. "If I've heard of complaints from a member of Congress, it gives me an opportunity or the deputy attorney general an opportunity to tell the U.S. attorney what we're hearing."

For an idea of the effect that "what we're hearing" can have, consider the case of former U.S. Atty. David Iglesias of New Mexico. Iglesias was fired after Republican Sen. Pete Domenici -- his one-time sponsor -- complained repeatedly to Gonzales and the White House that Iglesias was reluctant to prosecute vote fraud cases, a sensitive topic in a state George W. Bush lost by 366 votes in 2000.

Domenici also phoned Iglesias last fall and asked him if a certain high-profile Democrat was going to be indicted before the election, an inquiry Iglesias told lawmakers made him feel "leaned on."

Gonzales said he fired Iglesias based on "what I understood to be the consensus recommendation of the senior leadership in the department," but he offered no specifics -- except Domenici's complaints.

What, exactly, would a sit-down with the attorney general have been expected to yield in Iglesias' case?

Whatever Gonzales does to review prosecutors' performances will, by design, be murky, in the interests of maximizing executive power, the attorney general has indicated.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Maybe it's because people have less money to spend?
Posted by Jill | 6:37 AM
You'd think Federated Department Stores paid for this story:

Since the inception of the Web, online commerce has enjoyed hypergrowth, with annual sales increasing more than 25 percent over all, and far more rapidly in many categories. But in the last year, growth has slowed sharply in major sectors like books, tickets and office supplies.

Growth in online sales has also dropped dramatically in diverse categories like health and beauty products, computer peripherals and pet supplies. Analysts say it is a turning point and growth will continue to slow through the decade.

The reaction to the trend is apparent at Dell, which many had regarded as having mastered the science of selling computers online, but is now putting its PCs in Wal-Mart stores. Expedia has almost tripled the number of travel ticketing kiosks it puts in hotel lobbies and other places that attract tourists.

The slowdown is a result of several forces. Sales on the Internet are expected to reach $116 billion this year, or 5 percent of all retail sales, making it harder to maintain the same high growth rates. At the same time, consumers seem to be experiencing Internet fatigue and are changing their buying habits.

John Johnson, 53, who sells medical products to drug stores and lives in San Francisco, finds that retailers have livened up their stores to be more alluring.

“They’re working a lot harder,” he said as he shopped at Book Passage in downtown San Francisco. “They’re not as stuffy. The lighting is better. You don’t get someone behind the counter who’s been there 40 years. They’re younger and hipper and much more with it.”

He and his wife, Liz Hauer, 51, a Macy’s executive, also shop online, but mostly for gifts or items that need to be shipped. They said they found that the experience could be tedious at times. “Online, it’s much more of a task,” she said. Still, Internet commerce is growing at a pace that traditional merchants would envy. But online sales are not growing as fast as they were even 18 months ago.

Forrester Research, a market research company, projects that online book sales will rise 11 percent this year, compared with nearly 40 percent last year. Apparel sales, which increased 61 percent last year, are expected to slow to 21 percent. And sales of pet supplies are on pace to rise 30 percent this year after climbing 81 percent last year.

Growth rates for online sales are slowing down in numerous other segments as well, including appliances, sporting goods, auto parts, computer peripherals, and even music and videos. Forrester says that sales growth is pulling back in 18 of the 24 categories it measures.

Jupiter Research, another market research firm, says the growth rate has peaked. It projects that overall online sales growth will slow to 9 percent a year by the end of the decade from as much as 25 percent in 2004.


It may very well be that some stores are sprucing up and beefing up customer service to make them more appealing, but in a world in which Circuit City just fired thousands of experienced workers and hired new ones at three bucks an hour less becaue they didn't want to pay for experience, I don't buy it. Yes, my local K-Mart has been spruced up with new flooring and brighter lighting and Sears Craftsman tools and Kenmore appliances, but it still takes just as long to check out.

But if you look at reports for May retail sales figures, they tend to bear out a general slowing down of spending among those companies catering to Americans of modest means:

Consumers' "worries about gas prices have increased from January through April," Wal-Mart said in a June 7 statement. The company, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, predicted June same -store sales will be unchanged to a gain as much as 2 percent.

[snip]

Consumer spending and retail sales were "generally up," and several banks reported faster sales of "luxury items" than lower-end goods, according to the Fed's compendium of regional economic activity, known as the Beige Book, issued this week. In four districts, Fed contacts reported sales were "disappointing or below expectations."


Luxury goods tend not to be sold online, whereas those goods that represent discretionary spending -- books, CDs, DVDs, computers for home use, low-end electronics, and the like -- are more likely to be purchased online.

Fuel prices have also caused already-high shipping costs to shoot through the roof. Yesterday I bought a roll of edging veneer from Rockler, and a $2.99 roll is going to cost $6.98 to ship. Five filters for my furnace's dehumidifier cost over $10 to ship. On the other hand, how long would it have taken me to track down these things in meat world? In even ONE Home Depot store? This way the whole mess took me about fifteen minutes.

Given the amount of advertising revenue the New York Times receives from brick and mortar retailers, it's not surprising that it would run a story gleefully hailing "internet retailing fatigue" among the American people. But the truth is probably more one of a retail channel that is maturing into a more modest, normal growth track. There are those who will never shop online no matter how easy it is, and those who, for reasons unknown to me, actually enjoy the experience of going to a mall and shopping.

For me, you can move it all outdoors, cover it with stucco, call it a Towne Center instead of a strip mall, and put in as many Panera Breads and Green Mountain Coffees as you want -- it's still a shopping mall, and it still carries a bunch of clothes I can't wear and cooking supplies I'll never use and furniture I don't need. When I buy software, or books, or hard-to-find items, or bulky goods I don't want to have to rent a truck to shlep home, you'll still find me online.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

This will not be reported by the pundits who love faux-macho leaders
Posted by Jill | 6:15 AM
Last week Glenn Greenwald took a page from Digby's book and wrote about Chris Matthews' manlove for Fred Thompson in a larger post about the celebration of (faux) masculinity on the right, a milieu in which toughness is all about talk and not at all about action.

Republicans have long tried to exploit masculinity images and depict Democrats and liberals as effeminate and therefore weak. That is not new. But what is new is how explicit and upfront and unabashed this all is now. And what is most striking about it is that -- literally in almost every case -- the most vocal crusaders for Hard-Core Traditional Masculinity, the Virtues of Machismo, are the ones who so plainly lack those qualities on every level.

There are few things more disorienting than listening to Rush Limbaugh declare himself the icon of machismo and masculinity and mock others as "wimps." And if you look at those who have this obsession -- the Chris Matthews and Glenn Reynolds and Jonah Goldbergs and Victor Davis Hansons -- what one finds in almost every case is that those who want to convert our political process and especially our national policies into a means of proving one's "traditional masculine virtues" -- the physically courageous warriors unbound by effete conventions -- themselves could not be further removed from those attributes, and have lives which are entirely devoid of such "virtues."


Meanwhile, the REAL tough guys, the guys who have put their asses out there on the line, are coming back like this:

U.S. troops returning from combat in Iraq and Afghanistan suffer "daunting and growing" psychological problems -- with nearly 40 percent of soldiers, a third of Marines and half of the National Guard members reporting symptoms -- but the military's cadre of mental-health workers is "woefully inadequate" to meet their needs, a Pentagon task force reported yesterday.

The congressionally mandated task force called for urgent and sweeping changes to a peacetime military mental health system strained by today's wars, finding that hundreds of thousands of the more than 1 million U.S. troops who have served at least one war-zone tour in Iraq or Afghanistan are showing signs of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety or other potentially disabling mental disorders.

"Not since Vietnam have we seen this level of combat," said Vice Adm. Donald Arthur, co-chairman of the Department of Defense Mental Health Task Force. "With this increase in . . . psychological need, we now find that we have not enough providers in our system," he said at a Pentagon news conference yesterday unveiling the report. "Clearly, we have a deficit in our availability of mental-health providers."

The ongoing "surge" of more than 30,000 additional U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan will exacerbate this gap, as will the rapid growth in the number of soldiers, Marines and other troops -- now about half a million -- who have served more than one combat tour, heightening the risk of mental illnesses, the report said.

As in the aftermath of Vietnam, the costs of untreated mental illness will rise dramatically over time, the report warned. "Our nation learned this lesson, at a tragic cost," it said. "The time for action is now."

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates is required by law to develop a plan of action within six months on the 95 recommendations included in the 64-page report.

The task force, composed of seven military and seven civilian professionals with expertise in military mental health, was formed in May 2006. It based its report on visits to 38 U.S. military care facilities in the United States, Europe and Asia; interviews with care providers, military personnel and their families and commanders; as well as expert testimony and research.


Good luck getting a plan in action in place -- and funded -- by this bunch. This country is led by a guy who couldn't even lay off the blow long enough to show up for his cushy stateside National Guard assignment and a guy with a bum ticker who "had other priorities" when it was his time to serve, and who thinks doing the quail equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel makes him a tough guy. These guys are cheerled by a wizened little Jewish man whose idea of being in combat is to pump his fist at the screen and shout "Yeah!" and "All right!" while watching a fictional portrayal of American troops in Bosnia and a cadre of talk show heads not one of whom has ever served.

In the faux machismo world of these chickenshit politicians and the pundits who worship them, PTSD is a sign of weakness -- and flies in the face of the myth of the American soldier. Military training may be designed to turn human beings into killing machines, but when even those killing machines have what remains of their souls after the military tries to pry them out of them ripped from their bodies, we owe it to them to try to help -- and to speak out against those who would continue to worship the kind of dick-waving bullshit that brought them to this state.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share