"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, December 18, 2004

Here's why ribbon magnets are bullshit
Posted by Jill | 2:21 PM

Because of what these guys are enduring as they fight a war based on LIES and MISINFORMATION -- for which no one has been held accountable.
Bookmark and Share

Spit-take laugh of the day
Posted by Jill | 11:30 AM
Media Matters:

In response to reports that actor and comedian Chevy Chase called President Bush a "dumb f---" while co-hosting a December 14 People For the American Way awards ceremony in Washington, DC, FOX News host Bill O'Reilly asserted on the December 16 O'Reilly Factor that "you don't see this kind of thing on the right." He added: "You don’t see prominent conservatives cursing out Democratic members of Congress, for example."


To paraphrase Media Matters: Oh, really? In what universe?

(via Pandagon)
Bookmark and Share

The list of scapegoats grows daily
Posted by Jill | 10:33 AM

It's getting ugly out there, folks. I posted a few weeks ago about how gays were going to be the Jews of the Bush Reich, but it looks like it's not going to be just gays. The furor over the increasing likelihood that Mel Gibson's pornographic gore-fest The Whup-Ass of the Christ will be shut out of Academy Award nominations, when simmered slowly along with William Donohue's aspersions on Hollywood Jews' sexual practices, means that all the poisons that lurk in the mud are, in fact, hatching out. And I say, let's see it! Bring it out. I'm sick and tired of evangelicals saying how much they love the Jews, when in reality the only use they have for the Jews is as video game victims when Jeebus comes riding in on his Harley o'Hate to rescue them from having to deal with the rest of us. Cards on the table, I say.

And now there's another group that's going to be added to the mix.

Muslims.

Yes indeedy, folks. Now that the Bush Administration has succeeded in convincing Americans that the Taliban, Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and all citizens of Iraq are interchangeable in their villainy, now it seems that almost half of Americans are in favor of restricting the rights of Muslim Americans (emphases mine):

The survey conducted by Cornell University also found that Republicans and people who described themselves as highly religious were more apt to support curtailing Muslims' civil liberties than Democrats or people who are less religious.

Researchers also found that respondents who paid more attention to television news were more likely to fear terrorist attacks and support limiting the rights of Muslim Americans.

"It's sad news. It's disturbing news. But it's not unpredictable," said Mahdi Bray, executive director of the Muslim American Society. "The nation is at war, even if it's not a traditional war. We just have to remain vigilant and continue to interface."

The survey found 44 percent favored at least some restrictions on the civil liberties of Muslim Americans. Forty-eight percent said liberties should not be restricted in any way.

The survey showed that 27 percent of respondents supported requiring all Muslim Americans to register where they lived with the federal government. Twenty-two percent favored racial profiling to identify potential terrorist threats. And 29 percent thought undercover agents should infiltrate Muslim civic and volunteer organizations to keep tabs on their activities and fund-raising.


Why not just cut to the chase and make them wear yellow scimitars on their clothes? Or just open the camps? Why even go through the pretense that it's going to result in anything other than genocide? What do they think we are, stupid? (Answer: Yes.)

This is just horrifying. For anyone living in a civilized society, especially one that still has residual memory of WWII, hearing stuff like this ought to make your blood run cold. I may be about as lapsed a Jew as you can get, but I Have Not Forgotten, and I will NEVER forget. And part of not forgetting is to not allow the same thing to happen to any other group, either...even if there are members of that group who want to see Israel destroyed. That's between the Arab world and Israel, and it should have NO bearing on the rights of American citizens who happen to be of Arab descent or Muslim. As far as I'm concerned, American Jews have a PARTICULAR obligation to speak out against this.
Bookmark and Share

John Kerry is the new Clinton
Posted by Jill | 8:22 AM

These guys just can never let go once they get a grudge, can they:

The end of the 2004 presidential election campaign doesn't spell the end of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, the well-funded alliance of former servicemen that remains dedicated to preventing Sen. John Kerry from becoming president.

The group, which recently changed its name to Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth, plans to convene next month to celebrate its successes and to consider speaking out further about Kerry's military service, his anti-war activities afterward, and other issues, says William E. Franke, the longtime St. Louisan who ran the organization's day-to-day operations.

In his first interview about his role in the anti-Kerry group, Franke, a Navy veteran who served briefly as publisher of the old St. Louis Globe-Democrat in the 1980s, said his group succeeded in its mission to discredit Kerry and may help distribute a controversial film attacking the Massachusetts senator.

Kerry has given no indication that he might seek the Democratic nomination in 2008 and would probably encounter resistance from many in his party if he did.

Nonetheless, Franke made clear that his disdain for Kerry had not abated and that his group was keeping a wary eye on the senator's activities.

Franke offered no new evidence for his claims that Kerry misstated facts about his Vietnam service.
Bookmark and Share

Did YOU vote for this?
Posted by Jill | 8:18 AM

If you voted for Bush, you did:

Millions of Americans will face an increased threat of bacteria, viruses and parasites in their water thanks to a new federal policy allowing sewer operators to dump inadequately treated sewage into the nation's waterways. The Environmental Protection Agency's new plan, which reverses a current rule requiring sewer operators to fully treat their waste in all but the most extreme circumstances, will allow operators to routinely dump sewage anytime it rains. The EPA is expected to issue the policy sometime in the next few weeks.


So how do you feel about YOUR children consuming disease-causing parasites, viruses and bacteria from raw sewage in YOUR drinking water and in the fish you and they eat?

Surprised? Don't be. The Bush Administration has demonstrated its contempt for consumer safety every step of the way. "Let them drink bottled water", they say. Of course, when Americans don't have jobs that pay more than minimum wage, and seniors are poor again, they won't be able to AFFORD to buy bottled water. But so what? Does anyone really matter, other than the Bush family and their cronies? THEY'LL be able to drink bottled water any time.

(via Hoffmania)
Bookmark and Share
Friday, December 17, 2004

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 1:11 PM

"[Blackwell] claimed that Democrat and Republican areas were equally affected by voting machines, that he's made of Teflon when it comes to lawsuits challenging his authority, and that he is God's Gift To The Earth in every way imaginable. After giving this interview, Mr. Blackwell thanked Jesus, got into his spaceship, and flew back to the outer realms of reality, aka the Abyss of Bullshit, where he shares a lovely one-bedroom apartment with Baghdad Bob."

From "georgia10" at Kos)
Bookmark and Share

Al Franken: A Bob Hope for the Millennium
Posted by Jill | 1:07 PM

For those who are not Air America listeners, you should note that Al Franken is spending the holidays with the USO, entertaining troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yes, folks, Al Franken, that famous anti-American, treasonous LIBERAL is in a frickin' WAR ZONE to show his support for the guys Bush is so merrily and blithely tossing into a meatgrinder.

This is not the first time Franken has done this. Here's what he told Candy Crowley after his return last year:

CROWLEY: I was going to ask you that because unlike some comedians you are so well-known for your political views as well. Do you find that interferes at all, or are they just glad to have you there?

FRANKEN: They are glad to have me there. And also, I just -- my opening joke usually was, "Anybody here from out of town?" And then, you know, "This Army grub, it doesn't agree with me. I've had three MREs -- those are meals ready to eat -- and none of them seem to have an exit strategy."

So it's a different kind of humor I do, but every, you know, I had a number of soldiers come up to me and say, "I don't agree with you politically, but I so appreciate you coming." And they really do.

We had an urban, girl trio, singing group, and their manager -- we did a show in the hangar in Baghdad where the president had served Thanksgiving dinner -- and a soldier went up to the manager of these girls and said, "It's really an honor to meet you," and the manager said, "You don't understand, I'm just the manager of these girls."

And he [the soldier] said, "No, no, you don't understand. I'm a soldier. I had to be here. I met President Bush a few weeks ago. He's the president, and he really should come here. You don't have to be here. You came here because you care, and I -- so it's more of an honor to meet you."


The Freepers are, of course, apoplectic. If you can stomach it, the link gives you an example to some of the finest in completely irrational, uninformed, horseshit on the political scene today. 10 bucks says not one of them has sent a care package to one of the troops they claim to support so much. Certainly none of THEIR heroes -- not Limbaugh, not Hannity, not O'Reilly, not Coulter, not one of them -- has voluntarily expended the effort to put himself (yes, that includes Coulter) in harm's way to actually do something.

I guess that's what's so galling. All the more reason why it's important for our side to get those care packages ordered and those phone cards mailed to Walter Reed.



Bookmark and Share

What the cost of Bush's inaugural would pay for
Posted by Jill | 10:50 AM

Via "garfield" at Kos, here's what the $40 million cost of Bush's Thou Shalt Kneel Before Me Extravaganza would pay for:


According to my rough calculations, for $40 million dollars, we could be buying in between 160-222 newly armored Humvees for our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan and not even all of Rupert Murdock's new Apartment in New York, priced at $44 million.

For each $250K ticket sold to celebrate the event we could buy one of the most expensive armored Humvees.

At $849.00 apiece, we could be buying 47,114 different sets of Level IIIA Ballistic Steel, Ceramic or Polyethylene Body Armor to protect the troops.

For $200 apiece, you could buy a care package for 200K troops deployed overseas that included DVDs, magazines, cigarettes, cigars, letters from home, and some taped ACC basketball games.


All of you who think Democrats are elitists, please note that at this time of war, Captain Codpiece is throwing a party for himself, paid for with corporate lobbyist money, that's the most expensive inauguration in history.

It's good to be da king.
Bookmark and Share

Supporting the troops isn't about those fucking ribbon magnets
Posted by Jill | 9:24 AM

Sometimes I think I'm going to take a baseball bat to the next car that sports one of those Goddamn fucking ribbon magnets that say "Support our troops." No, I'm not going to; for one thing I don't have a baseball bat, and for another thing, I'm not a complete idiot. But sometimes I wish I could. Because it seems to me that far too many Americans think that supporting the young men and women that George W. Bush is feeding into his meatgrinder in Iraq is JUST a question of sloganeering. It's appalling how little discussion I hear about how many of our young men and women are being killed and maimed for life; and how little support there is for them, both in the Middle East and here at home. These kids are as much casualties of American sloganeering and complacency as they are of Bush's ill-begotten war.

What ever happened to the outrage over Rumsfeld's bitchslap of a soldier who dared to ask why they don't have armor? Is it simply because he was given the question by a reporter? What about the 2200 other soldiers who applauded the question? Instead of the kind of outrage that this incident would have engendered had the president's name been "Bill Clinton", we get the government suddenly scrambling to find enough armor, and "All Bernie Kerik All the Time". Not that Kerik doesn't richly deserve what's happened to him, but somehow I suspect this is more about prurient interest in his sex life than about any kind of moral outrage that he's a crook...especially since no one seems to be blaming the Administration for appointing this guy without a proper vetting, and no one seems to be questioning the competence of Attorney General-designee Alberto Gonzalez, who pushed for Kerik's appointment. No, like the Scott Peterson case, it's all about the sex.

Meanwhile, in real life, Iraq vets are already showing up at homeless shelters:

U.S. veterans from the war in Iraq are beginning to show up at homeless shelters around the country, and advocates fear they are the leading edge of a new generation of homeless vets not seen since the Vietnam era.

"When we already have people from Iraq on the streets, my God," said Linda Boone, executive director of the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans. "I have talked to enough (shelters) to know we are getting them. It is happening and this nation is not prepared for that."

"I drove off in my truck. I packed my stuff. I lived out of my truck for a while," Seabees Petty Officer Luis Arellano, 34, said in a telephone interview from a homeless shelter near March Air Force Base in California run by U.S.VETS, the largest organization in the country dedicated to helping homeless veterans.

Arellano said he lived out of his truck on and off for three months after returning from Iraq in September 2003. "One day you have a home and the next day you are on the streets," he said.

In Iraq, shrapnel nearly severed his left thumb. He still has trouble moving it and shrapnel "still comes out once in a while," Arellano said. He is left handed.

Arellano said he felt pushed out of the military too quickly after getting back from Iraq without medical attention he needed for his hand -- and as he would later learn, his mind.

"It was more of a rush. They put us in a warehouse for a while. They treated us like cattle," Arellano said about how the military treated him on his return to the United States.

"It is all about numbers. Instead of getting quality care, they were trying to get everybody demobilized during a certain time frame. If you had a problem, they said, 'Let the (Department of Veterans Affairs) take care of it.'"

The Pentagon has acknowledged some early problems and delays in treating soldiers returning from Iraq but says the situation has been fixed.


Yeah, right. Just like the body armor problem is "being fixed." How does that help the guys who've been blown up already because of inadequate body armor? How does that help a guy who's been kicked to the curb by the military because he's no longer useful as cannon fodder?

Meanwhile, while guys are still scrambling for body armor in Iraq, and veterans are showing up at homeless shelters, and C-Plus Caligula is planning a $40 million extravaganza for his second inaugural.

Does anyone else see a problem here?

So I'm going to repeat...here are two ways you can help:

1) Send a package of useful items via USO Cares. These "care packages" contain items such as deodorant, hand cream, bug guard, bath gel, and lip balm, pre-paid calling cards, disposable cameras, sunscreen, and baby wipes. For $25, you can make the holiday a bit brighter for a soldier stationed in Iraq. The site also includes space to deliver a personal message.

2) Send prepaid phone cards to wounded soldiers recuperating at Walter Reed Medical Center. Any amount is accepted, from $5.00 up. The address to send cards is:

Medical Family Assistance Center
Walter Reed Medical Center
6900 Georgia Avenue, NW
Building 2, Third Floor, Room 3E01
Washington, DC 20307-5001

Bookmark and Share

Friday Cat Blogging
Posted by Jill | 8:12 AM

Peace on earth? Stay tuned...to be continued.


Bookmark and Share
Thursday, December 16, 2004

I swear I have never met any of these people
Posted by Jill | 1:12 PM

It seems bloggers are dropping like flies from what sounds like the same nasty bug I've been down with for nearly two weeks:

John in DC: Americablog:

Someone. Euthanize me. Now.

I gave up on trying to sleep. Is something going around, cuz man it hit me hard right around bedtime. Ugh. This means I'll either be blogging a lot Thursday out of boredom, or I'll be in bed all day begging for someone to smother me. I'll let you know which.


Kos:

I'm feeling a bit under the weather. Sore throat, achy joints, congestion, etc. So I'm resting and overdosing on fluids and vitamin C trying to head this thing off before it becomes a full-fledged illness.


Waveflux:

I came home early today with a soul-destroying cold. It came on all of a sudden last night; this morning my throat felt like three miles of bad gravel road. You know how it is.

So apologies for the dearth of posts. I expect to be home tomorrow. I know I owe some of you an Amazing Race piece, and I'll get on it if this shuddery feeling I have doesn't turn into a fever. Man, I hate being sick this time of year. I gotta go find the damn thermometer now.


It's a goddamn conspiracy, I tell ya...

UPDATE: Maron has been ranting about his cold for two days now, and tonight Sam Seder was coughing like I have for the last two weeks.

I ain't kidding you, folks...something's up. It's Captain Trips, man, cooked up in a lab in Karl Rove's basement apartment at the White House...

ANOTHER UPDATE: Jon Stewart was drinking tea with honey on last night's DAILY SHOW.
Bookmark and Share

Celluloid Heaven
Posted by Jill | 10:25 AM

Oh, it's happy happy at Chez Brilliant, for in addition to the Big Sack O'Screeners I have on loan from a kind, generous, and intrepid soul so I can nominate knowledgeably for the Cinemarati Awards, I also have a box from Amazon.com that when shaken, sounds a whole lot like an extended edition DVD of The Return of the King was waiting at the door when I got home last night.

If blogging is light over the weekend, it's because I'm trying to put my mojo into reviewing.
Bookmark and Share

Spit-take laugh of the day
Posted by Jill | 10:11 AM

...from Scott at Poetic Leanings:

Queens in the Bush Administration?!

When giving George Tenet the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Tuesday, for God only knows what, President Bush commented on Tenet by saying "he still remembers his roots. There's still alot of Queens in George Tenet."

Does Mrs. Tenet know this? Who said the Bush Administration was anti-gay?!
Bookmark and Share

Do you believe in contraceptive use? Then you are a terrorist
Posted by Jill | 9:57 AM

So sayeth Missouri (sorry, shimes) Republican state Rep. Cynthia Davis, who is working on two new bills for the next session of the Missouri Legislature that will:

1) remove the state's requirement that all forms of contraception and their potential health effects be taught in schools, leaving the focus on abstinence

2) require publishers that sell biology textbooks to Missouri to include at least one chapter on alternative theories to evolution. (I myself hope they include the "The Universe Was Created by a Brobdingnagian Child Using Play-Doh" theory.)

More of the wisdom of Ms. Davis, who also runs a Christian bookstore:

"These are common-sense, grass-roots ideas from the people I represent, and I'd be very surprised if a majority of legislators didn't feel they were the right solutions to these problems."

"It's like when the hijackers took over those four planes on Sept. 11 and took people to a place where they didn't want to go," she added. "I think a lot of people feel that liberals have taken our country somewhere we don't want to go. I think a lot more people realize this is our country and we're going to take it back."


By force, if necessary, eh, Ms. Davis? So what's it going to be? Concentration camps and gas chambers for nonbelievers? Or do you just prefer the simplicity of burning heretics and witches at the stake?
Bookmark and Share

Why the Kerry Campaign Failed
Posted by Jill | 7:07 AM

James Verni, a Kerry volunteer on the West Coast, says what no one else dares: It was the Kerry campaign, not MoveOn.org, ACT, or anyone else, that did the campaign in.

It's at Salon, so a subscription or day pass is required, but here are some excerpts:

Let me tell you about the disorder and complacency inside the Kerry-Edwards campaign itself. Look no further for why Democrats lost the election.

[snip]

Most of the Kerry supporters I met on the campaign trail, meanwhile, were really just Bush-haters. The lack of knowledge or even curiosity about Kerry, his career and his proposals, was astonishing. Almost no one working alongside me had the slightest inkling of Kerry's policy initiatives (clearly laid out on his Web site). No one knew what he'd done in the Senate. Many volunteers, even some paid staffers, didn't know how long he'd been a senator.

[snip]

The one thing everyone did know? Kerry was not Bush. For most, that was enough.

[snip]

In the big Southwestern city operation where I spent the most time, a city that was the main population center of its state, and where Kerry's future would hinge on making direct contact with a few thousand urban and suburban swing voters, the campaign was haphazard and impotent. While the operations and press staff sat at their computers, tracking metrics and trying to spin reporters, no one seemed to want to take responsibility for the hundreds of callers and door-to-door canvassers who, like myself, were actually talking to those crucial voters.

[snip]

The precinct captains, whose job it was to decide which precincts to target, and to divvy those precincts up and shuttle canvassers to them, were for the most part poorly paid kids in their early 20s, just out of high school or still in college. They, too, seemed to have only the vaguest idea of who Kerry was or why they working for him, outside of a nameless dread of the future. They were committed but left largely unguided and, it appeared to me, uninspired by their superiors, and they had none of the unshakable confidence I saw among the Bush team.

[snip]

Despite all signs pointing to a massive left-leaning youth turnout, the campaign's presence at the three major Southwestern state universities I visited was nil. Perhaps the Kerry people figured that the 18-24 vote was in the bag. But you should never rely on such assumptions, as the Democrats' increasingly poor showings among minority voters showed.

[snip]

Still, the Kerry staffers I spoke with -- from the operations chiefs to the press crew to the precinct captains -- were possessed of a kind of wishful confidence, based not on any particular allegiance to the senator but on what E.M. Forster would have called panic and emptiness. No one could imagine a Bush win. The prospect was unthinkable. How could America reelect him? It couldn't. So it would elect Kerry. It must. Such went the tortured logic.


The article makes clear what I felt about Kerry from the beginning: All this focus on Kerry's "electability" as opposed to "That insane hothead Howard Dean" wasn't based on the man's voting record, or any sense of him as a human being. It was based on one thing: his military record. No one would dare attack a war hero, the conventional wisdom went. The Kerry campaign was based on one meme and one meme only: "I went to Vietnam and George W. Bush didn't." Way back when Dean was surging and people in my own family thought that Kerry would be a better choice because of the military thing, I told them: "If you think that Kerry's military service is in any way going to inoculate him against attacks, you're fooling yourself."

This is a "What have you done for me lately?" country, and one perfectly willing to believe the lies fed to them over the television screen. John Kerry gave an impassioned speech against Bush's war plans -- and then voted for them. I remember listening to that speech while sitting at my desk at work -- and letting out a stream of invective when he finished it by saying he'd vote for it. It was a cynical, purely political vote, and it backfired on him.

Looking at blogs and messageboards during the campaign, it seemed also that the extent of the Kerry Message was: "Look at who we're running against! How can we possibly lose?" This is a message reminiscent of Jon Lovitz' old sketch on SNL in which he portrays Michael Dukakis at a debate saying about George H.W. Bush: "I can't believe I'm losing to this guy."

I'm convinced that many of Kerry's supporters were of the "He's not Bush" variety, and you can't win elections that way. I saw, I FELT the energy surrounding the campaign of Howard Dean. We would have gone to the ends of the earth for that man. Even political cynics like me, who had long since given up on the process, were energized....and we began to believe that we just might pull this thing off. Of course, there's only so far that simple enthusiasm can take you, and the inexperienced young Dean Team in Iowa wasn't equipped to deal with the Mighty DNC, who behaved like Republicans in helping to derail Dean's candidacy. But most of us, aware that Bush had to be defeated, decided to be Good Soldiers one more time and support John Kerry.

At times he seemed worthy of that loyalty. I blogged right here at one point that I wanted him to be my president. But those moments were few and far between, and as Kerry foundered under the Swift Boat Liars' attacks, and seemed pathetically unable to articulate any kind of a vision, other than "We have a plan" and long-winded position papers delivered verbally, I slowly began to realize that the Democratic Party had put up another loser. Those of us who knew the stakes showed up to vote. But Kerry never put the fire in the belly of enough people to make them go to the polls in droves, regardless of weather or wait time. I'm not sure you need to regard your candidate as the Second Coming of Christ the way the Republicans regard George W. Bush, but you do need to believe in him. And even the people in Kerry's campaign couldn't find it in themselves to do that.

In answer to the inevitable question: Do I think Howard Dean could have beaten George W. Bush? Probably not. I don't think anyone could have beaten George W. Bush, given the Axis of Fraud that is Karl Rove, the mainstream media, and the voting apparatus in this country. But I do believe that Dean would never have turned the other cheek to the vicious attacks of Rove & Co., and he would at least have inflicted a few wounds on the way down.



Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Democracy Dead In O-hi-o
Posted by Jill | 5:27 PM
It may be surprising that I haven't been all over the Ohio recount issue, given that I've been obsessed about the voting machines for two years now, back when most people thought I was a wackjob, including my boss. Well, aside from feeling suckerpunched since November 2nd, I've also been sick for the better part of two weeks, trying to clean up after some home improvements, and swamped at work.

So for those of you interested in this subject, the latest dirt (and it's sure starting to look like there's a smoking gun in Ohio) is nicely covered in this diary at Kos.

So what does this all mean? Do I think that the Ohio electoral vote will be overturned? No. And frankly, the thought of a back-door Kerry presidency obtained via a recount in Ohio that Republicans will never accept, combined with a nearly 3 million vote loss nationwide (though it is probably less if we assume similar chicanery in states like Florida and New Mexico), combined with the absolute mess Bush has made of this country that needs to be cleaned up, does not exactly thrill me with joy.

If we learned anything during the Clinton years, it's that a Democratic presidency all by itself means nothing but a delay of the relentless goosesteppers of the Christian right. It just buys time, that's all.

So what do I hope is accomplished here? Simply exposure of the voting process in this country for the fraud that it is -- a fraud just as heinous as the judicial fraud that led to Bush's first term. This man is in the White House because his side cheated -- and the other side let him get away with it. There's no getting around this reality. So what's to do now? Try to find out what happened, and if it means marching the whole bunch of them out in handcuffs -- Bush, Cheney, Rove, Hastert, Ed Gillspie -- the whole crew -- and a Constitutional crisis, well, so be it. Then let's clean it up and have a fair election. If that's a laudable goal for Afghanistan, Iraq, and Ukraine, why shouldn't it be one here?
Bookmark and Share

And yet more conservative hypocrisy
Posted by Jill | 4:24 PM

Yes, conservative Christians are against abortion -- unless it's their daughters who are knocked up or unless the aborted fetuses from OTHER people might help them:

They come to him in search of miracles. The lame, the sick and the dying; young and old; Christians from the US, Muslims from the Middle East, Buddhists from Japan, agnostics from Europe. Some have been in wheelchairs for years and believe he can help them walk; others are kept alive by respirators, yet hope he can make them breathe. The voiceless have heard he can bring them speech. The terminally ill seek nothing less than more life. In many cases doctors and friends advise them to stay at home, not to waste their money, and warn them of potential risks.
For they come in search of one of the most pioneering - and controversial - medical procedures on the planet: the injection of cells from aborted foetuses into the brains and spines of the sick. And the object of their faith is a Chinese surgeon who spent many of his university years labouring as a peasant and is now conducting trial-and-error experiments on live subjects despite his research being rejected by the western medical establishment.

Dr Huang Hongyun promises nothing. He claims no miracle cure. He admits he cannot fully explain his results. All he knows, and all he tells his patients, is that his method often works, that the results speak for themselves. "Our results change thousands of years of traditional concepts," he says.

The conventional wisdoms that he claims to have turned on their heads are that chronic spinal injuries - injuries that can cause paraplegia or tetraplegia - can never be treated; and that it is almost impossible to stabilise the condition of patients with the wasting disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig's disease.

[snip]

None of these claims has been proven to western scientific standards, but Huang's willingness to think the unthinkable in order to cure the incurable is inspiring hope; so much hope that patients are putting aside ethical qualms, paying tens of thousands of dollars and flying to Beijing to act as his guinea pigs.

Among them is Van Golden, a Christian, anti-abortion Texan who has sold his house so that he can travel to communist, atheist China and have Huang inject a million cells from the nasal area of a foetus into his spine. According to Golden's doctors, his spine was damaged beyond repair in a car crash last Christmas. The damage to his nervous system was so bad that he has been in a wheelchair and racked by spasms ever since. But Golden refused to give up, even if it meant having to compromise his values. "This is the only place that offered us any hope," he says. "Everyone else offered only to help make me sufficient in that chair. But the chair is not my destiny. It is not ordained."


Typical. So, Mr. Golden, how do you figure those cells became available to inject into your spine? Or are you only opposed to CAUCASIAN women having abortions? Or do you think abortion is OK as long as YOU benefit?

(via Atrios)
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, December 14, 2004

A Perpetual Rant Machine
Posted by Jill | 6:06 PM

That's li'l ole me, folks.

In navigating the blogosphere since November 2nd, I'm sensing a bit of burnout among some of the old-timers, and indeed some of the new ones as well.

Not me, boy, no sirree. Of course, B@B is an infant as blogs go, but four more years of the Bush Reich, combined with the hypocrisy of those who would call themselves Christians when they are about as un-Christian as it's possible to get, ensure a constantly-replenishing pool of horrors from which to draw.

We're gonna stick around, folks. So grab a Diet Coke and a bag of Tempting Trail Mix from Trader Joe's, and join us for the ride.
Bookmark and Share

Quote of the Day
Posted by Jill | 2:46 PM

"Even God can't put anything past Noam Chomsky." -- James Wolcott
Bookmark and Share

Now opposing the Iraq war = endorsing terrorist activity
Posted by Jill | 1:55 PM

It's starting (emphases mine):

A Muslim scholar whose work visa was abruptly revoked after he was hired by the University of Notre Dame said Tuesday he has resigned his appointment.

``I'm abandoning the idea of moving to the United States,'' Tariq Ramadan told The Associated Press from Geneva. ``I want to maintain my dignity.''

Ramadan notified the university on Monday, citing the stress on him and his family from the uncertainty of their situation, said R. Scott Appleby, director of Notre Dame's Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies.

Ramadan, a Swiss citizen, was barred from working in the United States in August just days before he was to begin teaching at Notre Dame. The Department of Homeland Security cited security concerns but released no specifics.

Ramadan said Tuesday there is nothing in his past to justify the ban and demanded that U.S. authorities give details of its investigation of him in order to clear him of the ``untrue and humiliating'' claims that he was barred because of ties to terrorism.

``This is an obstacle to academic freedom of expression,'' he said.

He took a year's unpaid leave from his posts in Switzerland in order to work at Notre Dame and is now out of a job. ``I don't have any new plans for the moment,'' he said.

He had been paid by Notre Dame until he resigned, said Matt Storin, a university spokesman.

The revocation of his visa sparked protests from at least four U.S. scholars' groups, led a United Nations-sponsored institution to issue an academic freedom alert and inspired appeals on Ramadan's behalf from some Jewish groups.

Many who have rallied in support of Ramadan believe the scholar's sharp criticism of Israel, the war in Iraq and U.S. policy in the Mideast was the reason for the revocation.


At the time, the Department of Homeland Security said the decision was based on ``public safety or national security interests'' and pointed to federal law applying to aliens who have used a ``position of prominence ... to endorse or espouse terrorist activity.''



Here's a documented case in which someone was denied a work visa simply for disagreeing with U.S. policy, regardless of connections with terrorism. Can mass arrests of dissenters and bloggers be far behind?
Bookmark and Share

What would they do if the president's name were "Clinton"?
Posted by Jill | 11:58 AM

Others, most notably Josh Marshall and Steve Gilliard are covering the ever-escalating and eye-popping Bernard Kerik scandals better than I possibly could, so I defer to their coverage instead of re-inventing the wheel.

Still, I have to wonder: Given that we're looking at hot and cold running potential sleaze ranging from multiple adulteries to stalking to bigamy to hiring illegal aliens to talk of kickbacks from the mob, how on earth is it that the Administration can say this guy was fully vetted? And why, outside of the New York area, doesn't anyone care that a guy this unsavory nearly became our head of homeland security?

At the very least, this points to incompetence and/or extreme cronyism in the ranks of the Administration and the Republican party. At worst, it's arrogance of the first order. Somehow I think that if this guy had been named by a president named "Clinton", and all other facts were the same, House Republicans would be talking impeachment for trying to name a guy this corrupt to a post of this nature.

Of course, when it's a Republican president, and his name is "George W. Bush", he's accountable for NOTHING that happens in his administration.
Bookmark and Share

Christmas is a Pagan Rip-Off
Posted by Jill | 10:23 AM

Middle Earth Journal has the scoop.....
Bookmark and Share

Democracy in Iraq is looking more like U.S. democracy every day
Posted by Jill | 9:27 AM

...and I don't mean that as a compliment.

Riverbend, the Iraqi blogger, explains:

Most people I've talked to aren't going to go to elections. It's simply too dangerous and there's a sense that nothing is going to be achieved anyway. The lists are more or less composed of people affiliated with the very same political parties whose leaders rode in on American tanks. Then you have a handful of tribal sheikhs. Yes- tribal sheikhs. Our country is going to be led by members of religious parties and tribal sheikhs- can anyone say Afghanistan? What's even more irritating is that election lists have to be checked and confirmed by none other than Sistani!! Sistani- the Iranian religious cleric. So basically, this war helped us make a transition from a secular country being run by a dictator to a chaotic country being run by a group of religious clerics. Now, can anyone say 'theocracy in sheeps clothing'?

Ahmad Chalabi is at the head of one of those lists- who would join a list with Ahmad Chalabi at its head?


The not exactly left-wing Washington Times reports that only 1% of Iraqis have registered.

Gee, it took us 200 years to reach that level of cynicism. They've done it before their first election. Impressive, no?

Remember Marshal Tito, the socialist Yugoslav strongman? He may have been a Stalinist dictator, but under his rule, Yugoslavia was quiet. Almost the moment he died, the old blood feuds in the region, which, yes, had been stewing for years, suddenly bubbled over, and countries with names like Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina were suddenly at war -- and in the headlines.

It's starting to look increasingly as if Saddam Hussein played the same role in Iraq -- the military strongman whose despotic rule kept the warring tribes within his country's borders, if not at peace, then at least quiet.

Bookmark and Share
Monday, December 13, 2004

It's Koufax Awards Time
Posted by Jill | 9:50 PM

I'm usually not given to shameless self-promotion, but if you like what you've read at B@B lo these last few months, you might consider nominating this for a Koufax Award, the Oscar®s of blog awards.

The relevant categories are:

Best Blog
Best Writing
Best Post
Best Series (for our Republican Election Theft Watch)
Most Deserving of Wider Recognition
Best New Blog

Here's where to nominate.

Thanks for nominating, and even if you don't nominate, thanks for reading.
Bookmark and Share

Another Good Christian Man
Posted by Jill | 5:00 PM

This one's gonna have my mom quaking in her boots. She always said that an anti-Semite lurked under the surface of every gentile. It's from no less Godly a man than William Donohue of the Catholic League:

Who really cares what Hollywood thinks? All these hacks come out there. Hollywood is controlled by secular Jews who hate Christianity in general and Catholicism in particular. It's not a secret, OK? And I'm not afraid to say it. That's why they hate this movie. It's about Jesus Christ, and it's about truth. It's about the messiah. Hollywood likes anal sex. They like to see the public square without nativity scenes. I like families. I like children. They like abortions. I believe in traditional values and restraint. They believe in libertinism. We have nothing in common.


I'm not so sure I see anti-Semitism here, other than the ravings of a crazy man. These wackjobs have always been around. What I'm puzzling over is exactly HOW HE KNOWS that Hollywood likes anal sex? Has he experienced anal sex in Hollywood? Oh, do tell more! And what does he mean by "I like children"? I'm not sure the head of the Catholic League ought to be saying something like this, given his church's recent history with children. Or is that one of those "traditional values" he talks about?

See? Two can play this game.

(via Josh Marshall)

UPDATE: OK, I was wrong. Donohue really IS a vicious anti-Semite. Alterman reprints a horrifying transcript from Scarborough's MSNBC show (hosted by, appropriately, Pat Buchanan) last week, in which Donohue rips the kindly mask off of Roman Catholicism, and shows that the "blood libel" against the Jews is alive and well.

I'm reprinting it here because it's must-reading (yeah, like anyone actually reads this blog...):

[Rabbi Shmuley] BOTEACH: Stop the anti-Semitic garbage, OK?
(CROSSTALK)
DONAHUE: Who‘s making the movies? The Irishmen?
(CROSSTALK)
BOTEACH: Michael Moore is certainly not a Jew. Let me speak here,
DONAHUE: I didn‘t question that.
BOTEACH: Hollywood has become a cesspit because it‘s secular, period.
Don‘t this us—don‘t tell us that it‘s secular Jews.
DONAHUE: So the Catholics are running Hollywood, huh?
(CROSSTALK)
Is it time for Hollywood to dump Michael Moore, and how will the red states react if Tinseltown awards Michael an Oscar this year, and he trashes the president again in front of a TV audience of a billion people on Oscar night?
Bill Donahue, I said I would give you the right of response to the Rabbi‘s remarks before the break. The floor is yours.
DONAHUE: Yes.
Obviously, he‘s concerned about secularists. I‘m talking about secularists in Hollywood. They‘re not Rastafarians. They‘re Jews. Just pick up any copy of the Jewish...
(CROSSTALK)
DONAHUE: And you‘ll learn that.
BOTEACH: Those Jews.
DONAHUE: You‘re going to tell me that the Chinese don‘t live in Chinatown, right? To say that Hollywood is dominated by secular Jews...
Jennifer GIROUX: Yes.
All I can say, Rabbi, is, you‘ve got to concede the fact—and it‘s difficult because we all at times in life have to say, I‘m sorry, I was wrong—we cannot go back and make it that the Hawaiians killed Christ. Mel Gibson and all Christians...
BOTEACH: What are you talking about?
GIROUX: I‘m saying you can‘t rewrite history.
BUCHANAN: Rabbi, cut the personal insults, please. Rabbi, cut the insults, personal insults, please.
(CROSSTALK)
BOTEACH: Oh, come on, Pat.
(CROSSTALK)
BOTEACH: The Jews are ruining the world and you‘re telling me to cut the insults? Come on, Pat. Get real here, OK?


Am I anti-Catholic? Perhaps. But based on the above, and based on the fact that many members of my grandparents' families were murdered in Polish pogroms in the early part of the 20th centuries, and more in Hitler's camps, if William Donohue is the face of the Catholic Church in America, why shouldn't I be?
Bookmark and Share

Because man cannot live by politics alone...
Posted by Jill | 4:11 PM

...there's movies!

ModFab, which is our "brother site" covering the cultural beat, has all the latest awards news -- the NY Film Critics, Golden Globes, American Film Institute. Go start your awards gossip engines running!
Bookmark and Share

Forgotten Bloggers
Posted by Jill | 1:11 PM

Well, not forgotten, but certainly not as widely read as the Big Kahunas of blogging -- Atrios, Josh Marshall, Jesse, Ezra, and Kos. But there seems to be a growing "second tier" (or more kindly, "new wave") of political/cultural bloggers who ought to have a bigger impact than they do.

One I'd like to spotlight (though I wish he'd allow comments) is Waveflux. This blog has done more than any other to call attention to the plight of Lauren Rainey, the girl in Alabama whose nursing care is being terminated by Alabama Medicaid. This is precisely the kind of story that the MSM tends to ignore, since it's not as sexy as, oh, say, Scott Peterson, fights at NBA games, Nicolette Sheridan's towel, and what happened on Desperate Housewives the night before. But it's one where hopefully bloggers will make a difference.
Bookmark and Share

THIS is smaller government?
Posted by Jill | 11:00 AM

There's something in this lameass idea to offend true conservatives AND cultural laissez-faire liberals (emphases mine):

What should we do with US classics like Cat on a Hot Tin Roof or The Color Purple? "Dig a hole," Gerald Allen recommends, "and dump them in it." Don't laugh. Gerald Allen's book-burying opinions are not a joke.

Earlier this week, Allen got a call from Washington. He will be meeting with President Bush on Monday. I asked him if this was his first invitation to the White House. "Oh no," he laughs. "It's my fifth meeting with Mr Bush."

Bush is interested in Allen's opinions because Allen is an elected Republican representative in the Alabama state legislature. He is Bush's base. Last week, Bush's base introduced a bill that would ban the use of state funds to purchase any books or other materials that "promote homosexuality".
Allen does not want taxpayers' money to support "positive depictions of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle". That's why Tennessee Williams and Alice Walker have got to go.

I ask Allen what prompted this bill. Was one of his children exposed to something in school that he considered inappropriate? Did he see some flamingly gay book displayed prominently at the public library?

No, nothing like that. "It was election day," he explains. Last month, "14 states passed referendums defining marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman". Exit polls asked people what they considered the most important issue, and "moral values in this country" were "the top of the list".

"Traditional family values are under attack," Allen informs me. They've been under attack "for the last 40 years". The enemy, this time, is not al-Qaida. The axis of evil is "Hollywood, the music industry". We have an obligation to "save society from moral destruction". We have to prevent liberal libarians and trendy teachers from "re-engineering society's fabric in the minds of our children".


Read the whole thing. It's horrifying.

At one time, this would be the kind of raving from an obvious closet case that we'd laugh at. No more. These guys are deadly serious, and they feel strongly that Bush owes them one. And anything anti-gay is regarded by the Bush administration as a cheap "gimme" they can toss at the fundie closet case wingnuts to stave off their REAL agenda for a little while, until they create enough of a police state that they won't have to worry about it hurting them in the 2006 midterm elections -- things like mandatory Christian prayer in schools, criminal penalties for both doctors and women who seek abortions once Roe v. Wade is overturned, allowing only broadcasts that are acceptable to these people.

All I can tell you is do NOT think that just because you are not gay, it's OK to tolerate this. Gays are the Jews of the Bush Reich, and I am in no way convinced that they are not headed for the same fate once these people get their way. And in a second Bush term, they just might. All they have to do is continue hammering the idea that gay = 9/11. It worked for Iraq, didn't it?

If you're gay, you're already speaking out. If you're not, you cannot afford to be silent on this. Today it's gays. Tomorrow it'll be all of us who are not right-wing fundamentalist Christians.
Bookmark and Share

Why don't they want the vote audited?
Posted by Jill | 10:42 AM

Of course I know why. It's a rhetorical question. But Karl Rove's lackey in Ohio, Ken "Katherine Harris The Sequel" Blackwell, is sure trying hard to make sure that the vote count in Ohio can't be audited.

Press release from John Conyers' office, December 12:

Yesterday, it came to the attention of the House Judiciary Committee Democratic Staff that efforts to audit poll records in Greene County, Ohio are being obstructed by County Election officials and/or Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. According to Joan Quinn and Eve Robertson, two election observers researching voting records, Greene County officials initially gave Quinn and Robertson access to poll records, and then abruptly withdrew such access. Greene County Director of Elections Carole Garman claimed that she had withdrawn access to the voting records at the direction of Secretary Blackwell. Regardless of who ordered the denial of this access, such an action appears to violate Ohio law. Later, at the same office, election observers found the office unlocked, and what appeared to be locked ballot boxes, unattended. Prior to the withdrawal of access to the books, observers had found discrepancies in election records, and possible evidence of minority vote suppression.

House Judiciary Committee Democrats wrote a letter to Blackwell on December 2 requesting answers to 34 questions about election irregularities and fraud in Ohio. This letter included questions about major discrepancies in Perry County poll books. Since that letter, additional documentation has been provided to the Democratic staff demonstrating similar problems in other counties.

Because of the urgency of the Greene County matter, Congressman John Conyers, Jr., Ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, has requested that Ms. Quinn testify at a hearing scheduled Monday in Columbus, Ohio. Ms. Quinn has agreed to do so and will also present sworn statements from corroborating witnesses. Conyers issued the following statement:

"The Recount effort is simply a search for the truth of what happened during the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio. We have now repeatedly seen election officials obstruct and stonewall this search for the truth. I am beginning to wonder what it is they are trying to hide."


Will Pitt is right (emphases mine):

President John F. Kennedy once said, "We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." It appears all to evident today that the government of this nation is afraid of its people, afraid of the truth.

This is nothing new. Alexis De Toqueville observed long ago that, "The surface of American society is covered with a layer of democratic paint, but from time to time one can see the old aristocratic colors breaking through."

We are seeing those colors breaking through today in the privatization of the vote, in the denial of access to the results of that vote, and in the complete blackout by the mainstream news media of the simple fact that this is happening. Yet here we stand, and here we will remain. I support the effort to pass a constitutional amendment establishing the explicit right to vote in this country. A federal right to vote would bolster the National Voter Registration Act standards for voter registration activities, while also prohibiting voter intimidation and granting the Attorney General the power to intervene where voting irregularities of fraud occurs.

You may groan at that last bit, remembering who sits in the AG chair today, and who will sit there when Ashcroft is gone, but this is a fight for the future, and we will clean that house one day and seat an attorney general who is not...how do I put this? One day we will seat an attorney general who understands his or her job involves more than frightening people on cue whenever Bush lands in political hot water. A federal right to vote makes all of the things we have seen happening since the November election a matter of constitutional law. Diebold would be exposed by this. Blackwell would be exposed by this. The truth would be exposed by this.

I can think of nothing more important than the defense of our right to vote, I can think of nothing more important than the demand that all votes be counted, and I can think of nothing more important than the fight to cleanse our system of those who would steal from us these basic, essential democratic requirements. I can think of no coherent argument against enshrining our right to vote within the sacred document that defines us as a nation.

This is not a partisan political issue. I do not know what the party registration was of the woman going through chemotherapy, who fainted in line while waiting to vote. She left the line without voting because the line was too long, because there were not enough machines at her polling place. I do not know the party registration of the single mom who would have gotten fired from her job had she stood in that long line to vote. What about the man who was in the hospital and did not receive his absentee ballot, so he stood in that line with an IV in his arm. I have no idea who these people would of voted for. I couldn't care less. These people, and millions more besides, were disenfranchised in this last election. This is intolerable. Period.
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, December 12, 2004

Frivolous Lawsuits Indeed
Posted by Jill | 7:06 AM

The hypocrisy of the right knows no bounds. As we all know, one of the favorite bugaboos of conservatives -- right up there with gay people and Those Of Us Who Do Not Partake Of Worship of Joshua of Nazareth -- is trial lawyers. So you'd think that the "decency police" would shrink from even associating with such slime, right?

Wrong.

Via our good friends at Corrente comes a report that not even Jesus Christ himself can stand in the way of venality, greed, and hypocrisy:

The parents of a 13-year-old girl are suing US supermarket giant Wal-Mart over a CD by rock group Evanescence that contains swear words.
The lawsuit, filed in Washington County, alleges Wal-Mart deceived customers by not putting warning labels on the cover.

Trevin Skeens alleges Wal-Mart knew of the offending word because it had censored it on its music sales website.

Wal-Mart said it was investigating the claims but had no plans to pull the CD.

Wal-Mart has a policy of not stocking CDs which carry parental advisory labels.

Mr Skeens said he bought the Anywhere But Home CD for his daughter and was shocked to hear the swearing when it was played in their car.


But of course, this is ONLY about decency, truth, justice, God, the American Way, and the tender, virginal ears of Mr. Skeens' nubile young daughter, right?

Wrong.

"I don't want any other families to get this, expecting it to be clean. It needs to be removed from the shelves to prevent other children from hearing it," said Mr Skeens of Brownsville.

The lawsuit seeks to force Wal-Mart to censor the music or remove it from its stores in Maryland.

It also seeks damages of up to $74,500 (£38,660) for every customer who bought the CD at Maryland Wal-Marts, and also naming record label Wind-Up Records and distributor BMG Entertainment in the legal action.


Hey, even "cultural conservatives" are worried about Social Security. So like legendary bank robber Willie Sutton, they're just going where the money is.
Bookmark and Share

Yeah, and God talks to this guy too
Posted by Jill | 6:54 AM

I know I hammer relentlessly at stories of people who do awful things "because God told me to". But we are saddled with a President who went to war because "God told me to strike at al-Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did...". So I think it's worth noting, despite the claims of certain fundamentalist Christian leaders in this country that Bush is somehow anointed by God, that when you have the confluence of "God wants me to do this" and a whole bunch of people getting killed (see also: Osama Bin Laden, September 11), usually there's an unbalanced mind at work, rather than someone with a direct pipeline to the Almighty.

So in the spirit of reminding people of the kinds of things God seems to tell people to do, here's another one:

A college student who admitted he fatally shot his parents in their bedroom and broke a chain saw cutting up their bodies told investigators: "God told me to."

Philip Badowski made the comment in a recorded interview with police following the Dec. 2 slayings of Cester "Chet" Badowski Jr., 47, and Christine Badowski, 46. Prosecutors played the recording at Badowski's preliminary hearing Friday.


The above appeared in the Bergen Record today, but here are some related links:

WTVC News Channel 9

MSNBC

I'll refrain from commenting on...oh, hell, why should I?...on the fact that this crime took place in Tennessee, which is one of those red-state, heartland-values, God-fearing states that Republicans regard as "The Real America", unlike us heathens here in the Northeast.
Bookmark and Share