"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, April 28, 2007

So let me see if I have this right: When they're right wing American nuts, they aren't terrorists?
Posted by Jill | 4:41 PM
Funny how Rudy Giuliani isn't talking about guys like these:


Simultaneous raids carried out in four Alabama counties Thursday turned up truckloads of explosives and weapons, including 130 grenades, an improvised rocket launcher and 2,500 rounds of ammunition belonging to the small, but mightily armed, Alabama Free Militia.

Six alleged members of the Free Militia also were arrested by federal authorities and are being held without bond.

Investigators said the DeKalb County-based group had not made any specific threats or devised any plots, but was targeted for swift dismantling because of its heavy firepower. The militia, which called itself the Naval Militia at one point, had enough armament to outfit a small army.

"We classify these groups as violent and anti-government," said Jim Cavanaugh, who supervises the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives operations in portions of the South. "They stockpile things and live off a fear, a paranoia they're going to need weapons and explosives because some event is going to happen when they will need them."

"Any time you have a self-appointed colonel or a self-appointed major and they've got weapons and explosives, it is a recipe for tragedy," Cavanaugh said.


Uh....duh? While the government has spent the last five years monitoring Quakers and peace groups, the wingnut militias have been amassing weaponry like this?

And of course, because the Administration worships Teh BAYBEEEEEZ (® Amanda), guys like this aren't regarded as terrorists either.

I guess you have to be dark-skinned, Muslim, and Really Really Scary-Looking to qualify as a terrorist in the eyes of this bunch. If the Bush Administration had spent half the energy going after these people over the last five years as they've spent monitoring Moveon.org members, perhaps we wouldn't have guys in the Deep South accumulating rocket launchers.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Does this mean Future Marc may soon be real?
Posted by Jill | 10:35 AM
Wait till I tell Mr. Brilliant that soon he'll be able to have TWO of me yammering incessantly about politics.

On the other hand, it means more help around the house....

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Now what to do about the leathery skin....
Posted by Jill | 10:30 AM
And here I'd just gotten used to schmearing with SPF30 all the time:


For decades, researchers have puzzled over why rich northern countries have cancer rates many times higher than those in developing countries — and many have laid the blame on dangerous pollutants spewed out by industry.

But research into vitamin D is suggesting both a plausible answer to this medical puzzle and a heretical notion: that cancers and other disorders in rich countries aren't caused mainly by pollutants but by a vitamin deficiency known to be less acute or even non-existent in poor nations.

Those trying to brand contaminants as the key factor behind cancer in the West are "looking for a bogeyman that doesn't exist," argues Reinhold Vieth, professor at the Department of Nutritional Sciences at the University of Toronto and one of the world's top vitamin D experts. Instead, he says, the critical factor "is more likely a lack of vitamin D."

What's more, researchers are linking low vitamin D status to a host of other serious ailments, including multiple sclerosis, juvenile diabetes, influenza, osteoporosis and bone fractures among the elderly.


Sayeth pudentilla over at Skippy's place: "your mother was right. go outside and play."

Either that or take Os-Cal.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The times they are a-changin'
Posted by Jill | 7:53 AM
Last night while watching the amazing premiere of the new Bill Moyers Journal (and if you missed it, find out when it will be run again here), it struck me that if the fawning coverage of the Bush Administration in its rah-rah rush to war and the cozy relationship the mainstream press has had with the Administration didn't put the final nail in the coffin of the notion of a press unfettered by government control, the fact that the politically-motivated firing of U.S. prosecutors as a way of disenfranchising Americans was ignored by said press until a blogger noticed that something was just off about these firings should.

Last night Moyers' show featured the future of American news: Jon Stewart -- a stand-up comic who now hosts a fake news show whose viewers are more informed than those who get their news from mainstream media, and Josh Marshall, a blogger without whom Karl Rove would be well on his way to stealing another elections for Republicans.

Stewart continues to display the required modesty about what he's doing, but when a so-called news network like Fox is running stories from parody sites as real news becauee it fits in with their agenda, it's no accident that viewers of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, better informed than those who get their information from Fox News.

If you saw Watching the War on Wednesday night (video here), you witnessed the appalliing spectacle of Tim Russert, one of the most influential so-called journalists in Washington, dance around his role in allowing the Administration to push its lies and fabrications out over the airwaves:

BILL MOYERS: Was it just a coincidence in your mind that Cheney came on your show and others went on the other Sunday shows, the very morning that that story appeared?

TIM RUSSERT: I don't know. The NEW YORK TIMES is a better judge of that than I am.

BILL MOYERS: No one tipped you that it was going to happen?

TIM RUSSERT: No, no. I mean-

BILL MOYERS: The-- the Cheney-- office didn't make any-- didn't leak to you that there's gonna be a big story?

TIM RUSSERT: No. No. I mean, I don't-- I don't have the-- this is, you know, on MEET THE PRESS, people come on and there are no ground rules. We can ask any question we want. I did not know about the aluminum-tube story until I read it in the NEW YORK TIMES.

BILL MOYERS: Critics point to September eight, 2002 and to your show in particular, as the classic case of how the press and the government became inseparable.

Someone in the administration plants a dramatic story in the NEW YORK TIMES And then the Vice President comes on your show and points to the NEW YORK TIMES. It's a circular, self-confirming leak.

TIM RUSSERT: I don't know how Judith Miller and Michael Gordon reported that story, who their sources were. It was a front-page story of the NEW YORK TIMES. When Secretary Rice and Vice President Cheney and others came up that Sunday morning on all the Sunday shows, they did exactly that.

TIM RUSSERT: What my concern was, is that there were concerns expressed by other government officials. And to this day, I wish my phone had rung, or I had access to them.


If you didn't see it, watch it here.

But with the conventional media reduced to being Whores for Bush and then sitting around congratulating themselves on how tastefully they covered the Virginia Tech massacre (video and coverage by -- who else? -- Jon Stewart at C&L, here), where else are people supposed to find out what's real?

Journalists who actually do their job are routinesly punished by their corporate masters. Greg Palast doesn't work for a U.S. outlet, now, does he? And remember this woman?





You don't see her around much anymore, now, do you, not like you see Paula Zahn and the parade of lightweight Blondes for Bush. It's easy to forget what really happened and chalk Ashleigh Banfield up to being the Second Coming of Arthur Kent -- except that as Digby reports, Banfield was the Real Deal who was fired from MSNBC for the unforgivable crime of telling the truth.

When the reward for actual reporting the news is termination, when David Broder calls Harry Reid "an embarrassment" for saying the Iraq War is lost at the same time as 57% of Americans now favor either immediate withdrawal or a timeline for withdrawal, when the mainstream media are STILL, Keith Olbermann notwithstanding, shilling for Republicans in general and the Bush Administration in particular, where else would people be going to find the truth but a stand-up comic on a fake news show and a blogger who went after William Jefferson with as much fervor as he goes after Republicans?

UPDATE: Hey, Greenwald! I was here first! Régardez la timestamp.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Mission accomplished
Posted by Jill | 7:24 AM
Riverbend is an Iraqi blogger whose heartbreaking first-person accounts of the impact of the Iraq war on the very real people who live there have been must-reading for the last few years. Now she is throwing in the towel on the country that she has called home all her life:

The Great Wall of Segregation is the wall the current Iraqi government is building (with the support and guidance of the Americans). It's a wall that is intended to separate and isolate what is now considered the largest 'Sunni' area in Baghdad -- let no one say the Americans are not building anything. According to plans the Iraqi puppets and Americans cooked up, it will 'protect' A'adhamiya, a residential/mercantile area that the current Iraqi government and their death squads couldn't empty of Sunnis.

The wall, of course, will protect no one. I sometimes wonder if this is how the concentration camps began in Europe. The Nazi government probably said, "Oh look -- we're just going to protect the Jews with this little wall here -- it will be difficult for people to get into their special area to hurt them!" And yet, it will also be difficult to get out.

The Wall is the latest effort to further break Iraqi society apart. Promoting and supporting civil war isn't enough, apparently -- Iraqis have generally proven to be more tenacious and tolerant than their mullahs, ayatollahs, and Vichy leaders. It's time for America to physically divide and conquer -- like Berlin before the wall came down or Palestine today. This way, they can continue chasing Sunnis out of "Shia areas" and Shia out of "Sunni areas."

I always hear the Iraqi pro-war crowd interviewed on television from foreign capitals (they can only appear on television from the safety of foreign capitals because I defy anyone to be publicly pro-war in Iraq). They refuse to believe that their religiously inclined, sectarian political parties fueled this whole Sunni/Shia conflict. They refuse to acknowledge that this situation is a direct result of the war and occupation. They go on and on about Iraq's history and how Sunnis and Shia were always in conflict and I hate that. I hate that a handful of expats who haven't been to the country in decades pretend to know more about it than people actually living there.

I remember Baghdad before the war -- one could live anywhere. We didn't know what our neighbors were -- we didn't care. No one asked about religion or sect. No one bothered with what was considered a trivial topic: are you Sunni or Shia? You only asked something like that if you were uncouth and backward. Our lives revolve around it now. Our existence depends on hiding it or highlighting it -- depending on the group of masked men who stop you or raid your home in the middle of the night.

On a personal note, we've finally decided to leave. I guess I've known we would be leaving for a while now. We discussed it as a family dozens of times. At first, someone would suggest it tentatively, because it was just a preposterous idea -- leaving one's home and extended family -- leaving one's country -- and to what? To where?

Since last summer, we had been discussing it more and more. It was only a matter of time before what began as a suggestion -- a last-case scenario -- soon took on solidity and developed into a plan. For the last couple of months, it has only been a matter of logistics. Plane or car? Jordan or Syria? Will we all leave together as a family? Or will it be only my brother and I at first?

After Jordan or Syria -- where then? Obviously, either of those countries is going to be a transit to something else. They are both overflowing with Iraqi refugees, and every single Iraqi living in either country is complaining of the fact that work is difficult to come by, and getting a residency is even more difficult. There is also the little problem of being turned back at the border. Thousands of Iraqis aren't being let into Syria or Jordan -- and there are no definite criteria for entry, the decision is based on the whim of the border patrol guard checking your passport.

[snip]

On the one hand, I know that leaving the country and starting a new life somewhere else -- as yet unknown -- is such a huge thing that it should dwarf every trivial concern. The funny thing is that it's the trivial that seems to occupy our lives. We discuss whether to take photo albums or leave them behind. Can I bring along a stuffed animal I've had since the age of four? Is there room for E.'s guitar? What clothes do we take? Summer clothes? The winter clothes too? What about my books? What about the CDs, the baby pictures?

The problem is that we don't even know if we'll ever see this stuff again. We don't know if whatever we leave, including the house, will be available when and if we come back. There are moments when the injustice of having to leave your country, simply because an imbecile got it into his head to invade it, is overwhelming. It is unfair that in order to survive and live normally, we have to leave our home and what remains of family and friends ... And to what?


Doesn't this sound eerily like something one of the tens of thousands of displaced residents of New Orleans might write? As I've spent time every evening and on weekends working to return our basement to pre-nor'easter condition, I've often thought about the people of New Orleans and of the many thousands of people now leaving Iraq and realized how fortunate I am. For the minor inconvenience of having to throw away a few possessions and strip the floor down to the concrete are really insignificant compared to the upheaval and the uncertainty these two populations, now exiled into diaspora in the aftermath of Bush administration botched policy, are enduring.

Imagine leaving everything you know, everything you've ever owned, everything that makes your home a home, and going someplace where you have no idea if you'll be welcomed, if you'll be safe. Imagine turning your back on your entire life for an uncertain future.

Aside from the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi casualties that have resulted directly from the Bush Administration's misbegotten Iraq adventure, an adventure that will go down in history as one of the most heinous international crimes of our lifetime, there are other casualties as well -- casualties like Riverbend, who have chronicled the reality of what George W. Bush and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld hath wrought in their country and who potentially face ostracism and distrust everywhere they go.

Their tribulations are on all of our consciences.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Another sanctimonious Republican can't keep it in his own pants
Posted by Jill | 7:05 AM
And of course this was done as part of the Friday news dump:


Deputy Secretary of State Randall L. Tobias submitted his resignation Friday, one day after confirming to ABC News that he had been a customer of a Washington, D.C. escort service whose owner has been charged by federal prosecutors with running a prostitution operation.

Tobias, 65, director of U.S. Foreign Assistance and administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), had previously served as the ambassador for the President's Emergency Fund for AIDS Relief.

A State Department press release late Friday afternoon said only he was leaving for "personal reasons."

On Thursday, Tobias told ABC News he had several times called the "Pamela Martin and Associates" escort service "to have gals come over to the condo to give me a massage." Tobias, who is married, said there had been "no sex," and that recently he had been using another service "with Central Americans" to provide massages.


It's astounding that these guys are still using the "massages but no sex" excuse. These are the same people who railed against an impending collapse of the Republic because Bill Clinton said he didn't have sex with Monica Lewinsky, when "sex" had already been defined for the purpose of the case at hand as intercourse.

Why don't these Republicans know that if what you want is a massage, there are spas all over the country, many of them in reputable fitness clubs, where you can get a massage without going to an "escort service"?

Tobias was yet another Bush crony appointment, a former chair of Eli Lilly who had little knowledge about AIDS when he was tapped to be the U.S. global AIDS coordinator in 2003.

Here's how Tobias himself described his "credentials" for the job:

I had been in the pharmaceutical business for some years, and so I was certainly aware of the disease here in the United States, but I really didn't understand the impact globally, nor did I understand the changing nature of the population that it is affecting. So it's mostly happened since I've been in this job.


And here's what Tobias had to say about abstinence and condoms in the fight against AIDS in Africa (from the same source):


Well, the heart of our prevention programs is what's known as ABC: abstinence, be faithful, and the correct and consistent use of condoms when appropriate. This is not an American invention; this is something that President [Yoweri] Museveni in Uganda figured out over time when he recognized that there was an enormous problem in Uganda.

And it's also not "ABC: Take your pick." It's abstinence really focused heavily on young people and getting them to understand that the best way to keep from getting infected is to be abstinent and not engage in sexual activity until they are old enough and mature enough and get into a committed relationship, such as a marriage. B is being faithful within that committed relationship. And A and B, those two things together clearly had a huge impact in bringing the infection rates down in Uganda.

C recognizes the fact that there are individuals in high-risk circumstances who either by choice or by coercion are going to find themselves unable to follow A and B, and therefore they need to have access to condoms, and they need to understand the correct and consistent use of condoms. I think more and more of the experts, the people who really understand the prevention requirements with HIV/AIDS, have come to endorse ABC in a very balanced way as the appropriate prevention centerpiece.

But I would also add that as important as ABC is, the fact is that this is a disease where 50 percent of the people infected in the world are women. When I cite those numbers to people here in the United States, I find most people are astonished. They just have no idea about that. In some countries in Africa, it's well above 50 percent that are women and girls. In many cases this is driven by cultural factors, where young girls are having sex with older men and [are] coerced to do that, where women aren't regarded as equal citizens with men. So there are lots of things that need to be done addressing those kinds of cultural issues also.


So I guess we're supposed to believe that Tobias' commitment to abstinence kept him from having sex with the women he hired from a call-girl service to give him "massages". Uh-huh. And I am Marie of Rumania.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, April 27, 2007

Reagan's Assistant General Counsel Speaks Out on the theocratization of the United States Military
Posted by Jill | 2:03 PM
Bookmark and Share

You've got to be kidding
Posted by Jill | 1:30 PM
Rudy Giuliani, twice-divorced, a man who paraded around with his mistress and then brought her to Gracie Mansion while his wife was still living there, now paints himself as the Defender of Marriage:

In a startling departure from his previously stated position on civil unions, Mayor Giuliani came out to The New York Sun yesterday evening in opposition to the civil union law just passed by the New Hampshire state Senate.

"Mayor Giuliani believes marriage is between one man and one woman. Domestic partnerships are the appropriate way to ensure that people are treated fairly," the Giuliani campaign said in a written response to a question from the Sun. "In this specific case the law states same sex civil unions are the equivalent of marriage and recognizes same sex unions from outside states. This goes too far and Mayor Giuliani does not support it."


I for one would like to see him clarify that he means "one man and one woman at a time." Or perhaps even openly invoke the IOKIYAR rule.

Is anyone actually going to buy this buffoon as a presidential candidate? Does he honestly believe that his own sleazy marriage history makes his union with the equally sleazy Judith Nathan somehow more sacred than that of ModFab and Mr. ModFab, or that of my hairdresser and his partner, who have lived and worked together for over 30 years?

I'm sick and tired of this goddamn Republican sanctimony about morality. I am sick and tired of these people hiding behind Jesus, or the Pope, or whatever authority figure they worship and using it as a justification for their own moral turpitude while they judge others. It is high time the Democrats stopped this bullshit about "respecting faith" and forcing "people of faith" to recognize when they are being fed a line of crap. Note to Democrats: The Christofascist Zombie Brigade is NOT going to vote for you. Ever. So don't even bother to grovel before them the way you seem so tempted to. And as for the so-called "spiritual progressives", the liberal Christians who have allowed these people to speak for you? Well, it's time to start defending your faith. Because with your silence, you have allowed these scumbags to hijack your religion just as Islamist terrorists have hijacked the Muslim religion.

(via Raw Story and Americablog)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Melamine-tainted grain in the food supply is OK with the FDA, but vegetable juice is a drug?
Posted by Jill | 12:23 PM
In case you needed any further proof that the FDA is ALL about protecting Big Food and Big Pharma, here you go. Among the provisions of the latest attempts at regulation by the very same people who think there's low to no risk to humans with melamine from tainted pet food having gotten into the human food supply because hog farms bought feed on the cheap:

An analysis:


A Guidance Document open for public comments over at the FDA came to my attention this morning. The comment period ends April 30, 2007 and I strongly encourage my readers to take a few moments today to submit comments along with some additional follow-up.

Why?

Draft Guidance for Industry on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Products and Their Regulation by the Food and Drug Administration, Docket No. 2006D-0480 is as detailed and vague as it gets. It seeks to "tie up loose ends" many feel exist in current regulation around approaches used in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) by establishing guidance for industry about communicating benefits of a "wide array of healthcare practices, products and therapies that are distinct from practices, products, and therapies used in 'conventional' or 'allopathic' medicine."

The critical issues to think about:

1. The guidance document, if finalized as written, will regulate virtually all herbs and supplements as drugs if they actually benefit a medical condition unless it is "generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drugs, as safe and effective for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling."

Not only that, but also...

2. The document, if finalized as written, is extremely vague as to the extent of regulatory reach. For example, the document states, as an example, that vegetable juice (yes, vegetable juice) "absent any claims that would make the juice subject to the drug definition, the juice would be a 'food' under section 201 (f) of the Act because it is used for food or drink for man."

Now earlier in the document, in an attempt to define how vegetable juice might be defined as a drug, it is stated, "This means, for example, if a person decides to produce and sell raw vegetable juice for use in juice therapy to promote optimal health, that product is a food subject to the requirements for food in the Act and FDA regulations...If the juice therapy is intended for use as part of a disease treatment regimen instead of for the general wellness, the vegetable juice would be subject to regulation as a drug under the Act."

The FDA defines a drug as "...(B) articles intended for the use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals..."

So, with that, any person (or product) that states "drink some vegetable juice to prevent [insert disease]" is making a drug claim; and if vegetable juice is not recognized by the FDA as a legally available drug in the United States, the person (or company) making the claim is now subject to prosecution if they are not a medical professional licensed to practice medicine.

Vegetable juice, a drug?

Not only that, but also...

While it may seem unthinkable, consider this, as another blog highlighted, "[i]ts very specificity makes manifest fundamental inconsistencies and absurdities in the DSHEA law. If you substitute "water" for "cranberry tablets" and "severe dehydration" for "urinary tract infection," as found on Page 12, then you've turned water into a drug according to these guidelines. Obviously, the FDA would never turn water into a drug, but the guidelines allow them the option to do so. That "flexibility" alone makes the guidelines dangerous. In reality, what the guidelines do is extend the FDAs authority to arbitrarily decide when to enforce their will."

Not only that, but also...

The most alarming thing to me is the use of language throughout the document - the FDA sets the stage that anyone who is not a licensed healthcare professional (physician, nurse, DO, etc.) will be subject to prosecution for practicing medicine without a license because the terms used, "medicine" rather than modality, "treatment" rather than therapy. This is because of already established regulations and laws in all 50 states as to whom may "treat" medical conditions; these new regulations will specifically limit whom is able to communicate options to consumers to those holding a professional license. Any practitioner - homeopathic, naturopathic, reflexologist, Chinese or Ayruvedc practitioners, nutritionists, etc. - will all be at risk for practicing medicine without a license if they even suggest something like vegetable juice may prevent, treat or mitigate the symptoms of a disease.

Which brings us back to the vague nature of the document...the specific language - everything termed as medicine and treatment - leaves the very real potential that any and all substances - vitamins, minerals, herbs, co-factors, probiotics, etc - could be classed drugs, new drugs, or medical devices if they are being recommended to prevent, treat, mitigate or cure disease states (remember water cures dehydration).

While the media is silent on this, the FDA quietly awaits comments that few know are open.

Well, now you know and now you can let the FDA know what you think - because if we do not comment we'll have no one to blame when we lose access to the vast options available to us right now.

Here is what you can do to let your voice be heard:

1. Submit comments online. Be sure you include the Docket No 2006D-0480 with your comments.

2. You can also send comments via snail mail to:

Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305)
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

3. You can call and chat up the following people and let them know what you think:

Sheryl Lard-Whiteford at 301-827-0379
Daniel Nguyen at 301-827-8971
Ted Stevens at 301-594-1184
Wayne Amchin at 301-827-6739

4. In addition to the above comment submissions, write or call your representatives and senators! You can find the contact information for your representatives in the House and Senate here.



With more people every day becoming frustrated by the limitations of conventional medicine and feeling vulnerable to inadequately-tested drugs that are then taken off the market after people have been killed or suffered permanent damage, alternative treatments are becoming more popular. Obviously, the FDA cannot let this stand. If this were about making sure that supplements were pure and unadulterated and that demonstrably false claims cannot be made, it could be applauded. But this is clearly about placing obstacles in the path of herbals, botanicals, and other treatments not patented by Big Pharma so as to limit their availability. After all, Big Pharma's bidding will be done. They paid for it.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

The grit of Roger Ebert
Posted by Jill | 7:15 AM
While going through old VHS tapes the other day I found a tape I'd made of a special memorial program broadcast after Gene Siskel died in 1999. In some circles, it was Siskel who was regarded as the "real film critic" of the Siskel and Ebert duo, while Ebert was just a hack.

Of course, these are the people who gave me fits during my seven years of reviewing movies; the kind of cinéastes who don't like any movie that isn't made in the Czech Republic or by Lars Von Trier and isn't 4 hours long. People used to tell me I was a good reviewer, but mostly all I did was write about movies and tell people what I thought. I never professed to have any kind of great knowledge of the Art of Cinema. I wrote because I wanted to write, and that was all.

To those in the know, "film critics" are people like Jonathan Rosenbaum, David Denby, Armond White, and of course the Doyenne of All Film Criticism, Pauline Kael. But just as Beverly Sills made opera accessible to those who don't like opera, Roger Eberg has made film reviews accessible to people who just like movies and don't know a gaffer from a key grip.

When you strip movies of all the mystique, what you end up with are "honest stories of working people as told by rich Hollywood stars." This is something that Roger Ebert has always understood. The reason that Ebert's reviews have always been mandatory reading is that Ebert always evaluates a movie within the context of its genre and what it's trying to do, rather than judging an action shoot-em-up by how it stands up against Dancer in the Dark.

Yet Ebert has never been the kind of quote whore whose blurbs are usually the earmark of a movie you should be sure to skip. For while he has never been guilty of taking movies too seriously, perhaps no one else has been a bigger booster of creative filmmaking. And no one's image has been as iconic in its association with film criticism. And so it's hard to underestimate the courage it took for Ebert to appear Wednesday night at the Overlooked Film Festival, which he created.

The recent cancer announcements of Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow caused a nationwide epidemic of discomfort, as Americans faced the prospect of having to look cancer right in the face. Well, Elizabeth Edwards was right there at the Democratic candidates debate last night, and Tony Snow plans to return to work on Monday despite a dire prognosis. Roger Ebert has been rendered unrecognizable by surgery to remove part of his jaw as part of treatment for salivary gland cancer last June. He wrote about it earlier this week:


I have received a lot of advice that I should not attend the Festival. I’m told that paparazzi will take unflattering pictures, people will be unkind, etc. Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn. As a journalist I can take it as well as dish it out.

So let’s talk turkey. What will I look like? To paraphrase a line from “Raging Bull,” I ain’t a pretty boy no more. (Not that I ever was. The original appeal of Siskel & Ebert was that we didn’t look like we belonged on TV.)

What happened was, cancer of the salivary gland spread to my right lower jaw. A segment of the mandible was removed. Two operations to replace the missing segment were unsuccessful, both leading to unanticipated bleeding.

A tracheostomy was necessary so, for the time being, I cannot speak. I make do with written notes and a lot of hand waving and eye-rolling. The doctors now plan an approach that does not involve the risk of unplanned bleeding. If all goes well, my speech will be restored.

So when I turn up in Urbana, I will be wearing a gauze bandage around my neck, and my mouth will be seen to droop. So it goes.

I was told photos of me in this condition would attract the gossip papers. So what? I have been very sick, am getting better and this is how it looks. I still have my brain and my typing fingers.

Although months in bed after the bleeding episodes caused a lack of strength and co-ordination, the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago restored my ability to walk on my own, climb stairs, etc. I no longer use a walker much and the wheelchair is more for occasional speed and comfort than need. Just today we went for a long stroll in Lincoln Park.

We spend too much time hiding illness. There is an assumption that I must always look the same. I hope to look better than I look now. But I’m not going to
miss my Festival.

Why do I want to go? Above all, to see the movies. Then to meet old friends and great directors and personally thank all the loyal audience members who continue to support the Festival. At least, not being able to speak, I am spared the need to explain why every film is “overlooked,” or why I wrote “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls.”

Being sick is no fun. But you can have fun while you’re sick. I wouldn’t miss the Festival for anything!


If we had not recently seen Katie Couric attack Elizabeth Edwards on 60 Minutes for not having the decency to go home, die quietly, and not subject us to having to watch her condition slowly deteriorate, we might think that Eberts' friends concerns about bad press coverage to be misguided. But with cancer still the disease we dread most, it's inspiring to see high-profile people battling the disease refusing to just go away and hide. Roger Ebert loves movies, and for him to not attend this festival even if he had to be carried in on a sedan chair is unthinkable. And while there may yet be unfavorable coverage, so far what most papers are recounting is the standing ovation he received and the love the attendees have for this man who has arguably done more for the movies than anyone else in his field.

For those of us who have been admirers of Roger Ebert's work, the idea of a man who has made his living and his reputation through language being unable to speak is unspeakably cruel. And yet Ebert is right -- as long as he can think and type, he can still do his work. And so Roger Ebert joins Elizabeth Edwards and Tony Snow to form an unlikely trifecta of courage in the face of disease -- and show us how important it is to refuse to go quietly.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Payback's a bitch
Posted by Jill | 6:15 AM
George Tenet, who received a Medal of Freedom, presumably in return for keeping silent about the Bush Administration's determination to invade Iraq and the hell with the consequences, is silent no more:

“There was never a serious debate that I know of within the administration about the imminence of the Iraqi threat,” Mr. Tenet writes in a devastating judgment that is likely to be debated for many years. Nor, he adds, “was there ever a significant discussion” about the possibility of containing Iraq without an invasion.

Mr. Tenet admits that he made his famous “slam dunk” remark about the evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. But he argues that the quote was taken out of context and that it had little impact on President Bush’s decision to go to war. He also makes clear his bitter view that the administration made him a scapegoat for the Iraq war.

A copy of the book was purchased at retail price in advance of publication by a reporter for The New York Times. Mr. Tenet described with sarcasm watching an episode of “Meet the Press” last September in which Mr. Cheney twice referred to Mr. Tenet’s “slam dunk” remark as the basis for the decision to go to war.

“I remember watching and thinking, ‘As if you needed me to say ‘slam dunk’ to convince you to go to war with Iraq,’ ” Mr. Tenet writes.

As violence in Iraq spiraled beginning in late 2003, Mr. Tenet writes, “rather than acknowledge responsibility, the administration’s message was: Don’t blame us. George Tenet and the C.I.A. got us into this mess.”

Mr. Tenet takes blame for the flawed 2002 National Intelligence Estimate about Iraq’s weapons programs, calling the episode “one of the lowest moments of my seven-year tenure.” He expresses regret that the document was not more nuanced, but says there was no doubt in his mind at the time that Saddam Hussein possessed unconventional weapons. “In retrospect, we got it wrong partly because the truth was so implausible,” he writes.


Yet even Tenet is still in the same kind of codpiece-worshipping manlove that has characterized pundits from Chris Matthews to G. Gordon Liddy when talking about the diminutive Drunk-in-Chief:

Despite such sweeping indictments, Mr. Bush, who in 2004 awarded Mr. Tenet a Presidential Medal of Freedom, is portrayed personally in a largely positive light, with particular praise for the his leadership after the 2001 attacks. “He was absolutely in charge, determined, and directed,” Mr. Tenet writes of the president, whom he describes as a blunt-spoken kindred spirit.


I have never understood the appeal of this notion of "in charge, determined, and directed" to which at least 30% of Americans have also been in thrall for the last five years. A strong leader is a positive, especially after a national trauma, but it's troubling that Americans from the least-informed to the former head of the CIA succumbed to this kind of phony macho posturing that was always more about emulating movie tough guys than about real leadership. When you think about Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose demeanor was never that of a tough guy, disability or no, standing up and saying "We have nothing to fear but fear itself", Americans looked at their families and said, "YOu know what? He's right. We'll get through this." But George W. Bush painted himself as the all-potent daddy-protector, but instead of being a nurturing father who puts a child's fear at ease, he played on those primal fears to gain support for consolidation of power.

It's almost too easy to make Cheney the lightning rod for everything that's gone wrong with the Iraq war. His ice-cold demeanor, the snarl which curls every time the man opens his mouth, the utter sang-froid that gives the impression that he could order a bombing that would wipe out an entire population of a medium-size country and then devour a couple of racks of ribs without pausing for breath, make him the perfect embodiment of Darth Vader. But is it really right to let Bush off the hook? Does anyone still believe that given what we know about Bush's issues with his father, that Iraq would have been handled one iota differently if Cheney weren't around?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

OK, now that it isn't just pet food, will people finally start paying attention?
Posted by Jill | 5:53 AM
While Rudy Giuliani talks about how only Republicans can keep you safe from terrorists, American corporate terrorists are not only putting your pets' lives at risk, now it's YOUR life as well:

Several hundred of the 6,000 hogs that may have eaten contaminated pet food are believed to have entered the food supply for humans, the government said Thursday. The potential risk to human health was said to be very low.


And we should believe anything this Administration says....why?


The government told the three states involved it would not allow meat from any of the hogs that ate the feed to enter the food supply.

No more than 345 hogs from farms in California, New York and South Carolina are involved, according to the Agriculture Department. It appears the large majority of the hogs that may have been exposed are still on the farms where they are being raised, spokeswoman Nicol Andrews said.

Salvaged pet food from companies known or suspected of using a tainted ingredient was shipped to hog farms in seven states for use as feed.

The government will compensate farmers if they kill those hogs, said Kenneth Peterson of department's Food Safety and Inspection Service. The department knew of no countries moving to suspend imports of U.S. pork products.

Also, a poultry feed mill in an eighth state, Missouri, also received possibly contaminated pet food scraps left over from production. The fate of the feed made from that waste was under investigation.

The pet food sent to the farms later was discovered to have an ingredient, rice protein concentrate, imported from China that was tainted by an industrial chemical, melamine. Testing also revealed other related and similarly banned compounds, including cyanuric acid. Food and Drug Administration inspectors were preparing to visit China as part of the agency's investigation.

Melamine is not considered a human health concern. But there is no scientific data on the health effects of melamine combined with the other compounds, said David Elder, director of enforcement for the FDA.

Still, the FDA and Agriculture Department believe the likelihood of someone becoming ill after eating pork from hogs fed contaminated feed is very low. Meanwhile, the University of California, Davis, is developing a test to measure melamine levels in tissue, Andrews said.


And they base this belief on....what? Faith in Jesus? The Flying Spaghetti Monster? A game of rock paper scissors? What? Note also how the government plans to reimburse these hog farmers who bought hog feed on the cheap, while flood-stricken New Jerseyans waited a week and a half for just the northern half of the state to be declared a disaster area.

It's all well and good to talk about terrorism, but the kind of fearmongering that has become entrenched in Republican rhetoric is completely disingenuous when this same Republican party is perfectly willing to allow corporations to put not just your pets' lives, but your own, at risk in the name of profit.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, April 26, 2007

Around the blogroll and elsewhere
Posted by Jill | 6:44 AM
...because I'm feeling uninspired today. I've got a bad case of spring fever, I'm tired all the time, I'm sick of prying up floor tiles in the basement, I still have tons of crap to move out of there before the floor guys come next week, and somewhere I have to find a way in the midst of setting up four studies to take yet another day off so the plumber can come and finally replace the upstairs toilet and vanity. Not that I'm complaining; being swamped with work means having a job, and that's a GOOD thing. But my brain has too much buzzing around to write anything coherent, so while I make MP3 files out of old cassette tapes of the long-lost American Radio Company (which was the short-lived, New York-based, edgier version of A Prairie Home Companion and featured the fabulous Ivy Austin), why not take a spin around the outskirts of Blogtopia (® Skippy), where the air is cleaner, there's less traffic, and fewer assholes on the road?

In the wake of the disgusting smears by a United States military officer against Pat Tillman's family, ShakesSis writes about "clean-slate Christianity" and points us to this terrific post at The Thinkery (who joins our blogroll today) about fundamentalism and contempt for life.

Mad Kane has some thoughts on Laura Bush's assertion that no one -- not the Iraqis whose country has been blown to smithereens for no reasons, not the families of those soldiers who have died, not the returning soldiers looking ahead to lives without limbs, without eyesight, and with permanent nightmares -- suffers more than she and Captain Codpiece do about the Iraq war.

The much-missed Sam Seder has an appalling video by someone who fancies herself a Serious Conservative Thinker.

Melina, who can string together seemingly unrelated topics better than anyone else in the known universe, writes about the Loss of the Bees -- and about the New York Times' self-styled Queen Bee. And also about parrots.

Tata gets metaphysical.

And while we're in the realm of bees and the metaphysical, Lynn puts it all together.

Read about the link between homophobia and school shooters at The Republic of T here and here.

ShortWoman has had quite enough of Washington Mutual, thank you very much.

This may not be of interest to anyone outside of New Jersey's Fifth District, but Matt Fretz has a must-read post for anyone still cleaning out the basement about the incongruity between Rep. Ernie Scott Garrett visiting people in his district promising flood help while he has consistently voted against projects that might have helped prevent this very kind of flooding that we saw a week and a half ago. (And just as an aside, it doesn't look like George Bush plans to declare the flood-ravaged areas as disaster areas, so all those good loyal Republican voters in NJ-5 might want to think about a government that will screw over a district to punish its residents for not voting for them).

The other Jill, at Feministe, has a post you must read on the "women as mere vessel" mindset of the Christofascist Zombie Brigade.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

In the Rovian model, governing is ALL about maintaining political power
Posted by Jill | 6:25 AM
As the pet food recall continues and expands (the latest recall is Drs. Foster and Smith Dry Lite dog and cat foods), melamine-tainted grains have found their way into the human food supply, and American chocolate manufacturers, obviously feeling strapped by the expense of increasing the cacao content of dark chocolate, want to pass off artificial sweeteners, milk substitutes and trans fats for actual sugar, milk, and cocoa butter; we now find out that federal agencies have been run as extensions of the RNC during the Bush years:


White House officials conducted 20 private briefings on Republican electoral prospects in the last midterm election for senior officials in at least 15 government agencies covered by federal restrictions on partisan political activity, a White House spokesman and other administration officials said yesterday.

The previously undisclosed briefings were part of what now appears to be a regular effort in which the White House sent senior political officials to brief top appointees in government agencies on which seats Republican candidates might win or lose, and how the election outcomes could affect the success of administration policies, the officials said.

The existence of one such briefing, at the headquarters of the General Services Administration in January, came to light last month, and the Office of Special Counsel began an investigation into whether the officials at the briefing felt coerced into steering federal activities to favor those Republican candidates cited as vulnerable.

Such coercion is prohibited under a federal law, known as the Hatch Act, meant to insulate virtually all federal workers from partisan politics. In addition to forbidding workplace pressures meant to influence an election outcome, the law bars the use of federal resources -- including office buildings, phones and computers -- for partisan purposes.

The administration maintains that the previously undisclosed meetings were appropriate. Those discussing the briefings on the record yesterday uniformly described them as merely "informational briefings about the political landscape." But House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), who has been investigating the GSA briefing, said, "Politicization of departments and agencies is a serious issue. We need to know more about these and other briefings."

In the GSA briefing -- conducted like all the others by a deputy to chief White House political adviser Karl Rove -- two slides were presented showing 20 House Democrats targeted for defeat and several dozen vulnerable Republicans.

At its completion, GSA Administrator Lurita Alexis Doan asked how GSA projects could be used to help "our candidates," according to half a dozen witnesses. The briefer, J. Scott Jennings, said that topic should be discussed "off-line," the witnesses said. Doan then replied, "Oh, good, at least as long as we are going to follow up," according to an account given by former GSA chief acquisition officer Emily Murphy to House investigators, according to a copy of the transcript.


Federal agencies used to help Republican candidates. A Justice Department built around disenfranchising potential Democratic voters. A Congress rubberstamping the Bush Administration's most flagrant attempts to circumvent the United States Constitution. This has been our government for the last six years until George W. Bush overplayed his Iraq hand, George Allen had his macaca moment and Congress was finally turned over to people who will hold this bunch of criminals to account.

The question is this: Will voters in 2008 remember the last eight years when they vote? Or will they succumb to the "vote Republican or die" rhetoric of Rudy Giuliani?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Welcome back, Keith
Posted by Jill | 5:52 AM
It took a scumbucket like Rudy Giuliani, taking a page from the Cheney playbook by saying "Vote for me or die in a terrorist attack", to get Keith Olbermann going again. But Olbermann lost friends in the 9/11 attacks, and he remembers how Giuliani fatigue had set in among New Yorkers until the deaths of almost 3000 people and the disastrous performance of a chickenshit president turned him into the hero of 9/11 -- simply because he showed up.

But enough from me. Keith does it much better:





(Special thanks to our good friend and fellow Jamaicophile Hoffmania for uploading this amazing-quality video.)

Meanwhile, the New York Times, still in thrall to the self-proclaimed Hero of 9/11 just because he showed up for work, writes about this disgusting charge that Democrats = Death as "broadening his message on terrorism."

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, April 25, 2007

The best post on abortion you will ever read
Posted by Jill | 3:38 PM
Go read this and then tell me if ANYONE in the government, ESPECIALLY a bunch of Catholic Supreme Court Justices, ought to control women's bodies.

(h/t: Shakesville)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

From an Angry Soldier
Posted by Jill | 9:20 AM
Hopefully this will make even one person think about that stupid fucking Chinese-made yellow ribbon magnet he has on his gas-guzzling SUV:

I'm having the worst damn week of my whole damn life so I'm going to write this while I'm pissed off enough to do it right.

I am SICK of all this bullshit people are writing about the Iraq war. I am abso-fucking-lutely sick to death of it. What the fuck do most of you know about it? You watch it on TV and read the commentaries in the newspaper or Newsweek or whatever god damn yuppie news rag you subscribe to and think you're all such fucking experts that you can scream at each other like five year old about whether you're right or not. Let me tell you something: unless you've been there, you don't know a god damn thing about it. It you haven't been shot at in that fucking hell hole, SHUT THE FUCK UP!

How do I dare say this to you moronic war supporters who are "Supporting our Troops" and waving the flag and all that happy horse shit? I'll tell you why. I'm a Marine and I served my tour in Iraq. My husband, also a Marine, served several. I left the service six months ago because I got pregnant while he was home on leave and three days ago I get a visit from two men in uniform who hand me a letter and tell me my husband died in that fucking festering sand-pit. He should have been home a month ago but they extended his tour and now he's coming home in a box.

You fuckers and that god-damn lying sack of shit they call a president are the reason my husband will never see his baby and my kid will never meet his dad.

And you know what the most fucked up thing about this Iraq shit is? They don't want us there. They're not happy we came and they want us out NOW. We fucked up their lives even worse than they already were and they're pissed off. We didn't help them and we're not helping them now. That's what our soldiers are dying for.

Oh while I'm good and worked up, the government doesn't even have the decency to help out the soldiers whos lives they ruined. If you really believe the military and the government had no idea the veterans' hospitals were so fucked up, you are a god-damn retard. They don't care about us. We're disposable. We're numbers on a page and they'd rather forget we exist so they don't have to be reminded about the families and lives they ruined while they're sipping their cocktails at another fund raiser dinner. If they were really concerned about supporting the troops, they'd bring them home so their families wouldn't have to cry at a graveside and explain to their children why mommy or daddy isn't coming home. Because you can't explain it. We're not fighting for our country, we're not fighting for the good of Iraq's people, we're fighting for Bush's personal agenda. Patriotism my ass. You know what? My dad served in Vietnam and NOTHING HAS CHANGED.


I wonder if John McCain will read this?

(h/t: Beltway Bump via Fallenmonk)

UPDATE: Joe Sudbay reports at Americablog on Laura Bush's comment that "no one suffers more" than she and the Drunk-in-Chief about Iraq. I think the mother/widow/soldier quoted above might have something to say about that.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Maybe we need to rethink this whole Israel thing
Posted by Jill | 6:38 AM
Is this what we're supporting with our blind support of Israel?

The other day I was waiting for a bus in downtown Jerusalem. I was in the bustling orthodox Jewish neighbourhood of Mea Sharim and the bus stop was extremely crowded.

When the Number 40 bus arrived, the most curious thing happened. Husbands left heavily pregnant wives or spouses struggling with prams and pushchairs to fend for themselves as they and all other male passengers got on at the front of the bus.

Women moved towards the rear door to get on at the back.

When on the bus, I tried to buck the system, moving my way towards the driver but was pushed back towards the other women.

These are what orthodox Jews call "modesty buses".

The separation system operates on 30 public bus routes across Israel.

The authorities here say the arrangement is voluntary, but in practice, as I found out, there is not much choice involved.

'Abuse and threats'

Naomi Regen is one of a group of women now taking the separation bus system to court. She is an orthodox Jew herself.

"I wasn't trying to start a revolution, all I wanted to do was get home," she tells me.

"I was in downtown Jerusalem and I saw a bus going straight to my neighbourhood and I got on and sat down, in a single seat behind the driver.

"It was a completely empty bus, and all of a sudden, some men started getting on, ultra-orthodox men. They told me I was not allowed to sit there, I had to go to the back of the bus."

Not only is the segregation system discriminatory, says Ms Regen, but it can also be dangerous, she says, for those like her who ignore it.

"I said to him look, if you bring me a code of Jewish law and show me where it's written that I have to sit at the back of the bus I'll move.

"And he tried to gain support from the rest of the passengers and I underwent a half-hour of pure hell - abuse, humiliation, threats, even physical intimidation."

[snip]

One man told me that if some people wanted segregation buses they should pay a private company to provide them.

Another told me that in a society that is democratic and where the buses are subsidised by the government, a minority's concerns should not override those of the majority.

But Shlomo Rosenstein disagrees. He is a city councillor in Jerusalem where a large proportion of Israel's segregation lines operate.

"This really is about positive discrimination, in women's favour. Our religion says there should be no public contact between men and women, this modesty barrier must not be broken."


So tell me how this differs from the Islamic treatment of women that the lunatics on the right who are of the Hebraic persuasion (*cough* Debbie Schlussel *cough*) rail against?

And does anyone else think that "modesty buses" sounds just a bit too much like "purity balls"?

(h/t: Cernig)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

This is how it's done, folks
Posted by Jill | 6:10 AM
Maybe those Stewart/Colbert 2008 bumper stickers are on to something.

Jon Stewart has had a peculiar kind of manlove for John McCain for a long time. So it's remarkable that even Stewart has had enough of McCain's peculiar obsession with the Iraq White Whale.

The video of McCain's appearance on The Daily Show demonstrates why people who want the serious questions asked are turning to a fake news show on a comedy channel, rather than the so-called journalists of the conventional news media.

Jon Stewart dares to ask the tough questions that "serious" journalists won't. What does THAT say?

Go watch the video at One Good Move. Democratic politicians, take note.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Maureen Dowd Is Not Our Friend
Posted by Jill | 5:58 AM
It's been tempting during the past six years to think that Maureen Dowd was a voice for sanity with some of her columns about the Bush Administration. But no one should succumb to the siren song of the Fading Flirt, for as the 2008 race gets going, MoDo is sharpening her claws for Democrats only. Last week she picked up Ann Coulter's "John Edwards is a faggot" meme by suggesting that Edwards is somehow not manly enough to be president because he doesn't have a nice military buzzcut like Jon Tester. Today she goes after Michelle Obama:

I wince a bit when Michelle Obama chides her husband as a mere mortal — a comic routine that rests on the presumption that we see him as a god.

The tweaking takes place at fundraisers, where Michelle wants to lift the veil on their home life a bit and give the folks their money’s worth.

At the big Hollywood fund-raiser for Senator Obama in February, Michelle came on strong.

“I am always a little amazed at the response that people get when they hear from Barack,” she told the crowd at the Beverly Hilton, as her husband stood by looking like a puppy being scolded, reported Hud Morgan of Men’s Vogue. “A great man, a wonderful man. But still a man. ...

“I have some difficulty reconciling the two images I have of Barack Obama. There’s Barack Obama the phenomenon. He’s an amazing orator, Harvard Law Review, or whatever it was, law professor, best-selling author, Grammy winner. Pretty amazing, right?

“And then there’s the Barack Obama that lives with me in my house, and that guy’s a little less impressive. For some reason this guy still can’t manage to put the butter up when he makes toast, secure the bread so that it doesn’t get stale, and his 5-year-old is still better at making the bed than he is.”

She said that the TV version of Barack Obama sounded really interesting and that she’d like to meet him sometime.

Many people I talked to afterward found Michelle wondrous. But others worried that her chiding was emasculating, casting her husband — under fire for lacking experience — as an undisciplined child.


Ooh. She's good, isn't she? This is the best use of the Fox News "Some people say..." construct since Katie Couric's hatchet job on the John and Elizabeth Edwards on 60 Minutes.

Then she blames Michelle Obama for not having the foresight to anticipate the indictment of Tony Rezko.

Does anyone smell a Bill and Hill Reduz on the Land of Mo[r]Do[r] here? That Obama is within seven points of Hillary Clinton in South Carolina obviously made it more urgent for MoDo to unsheath her claws on him than to do another snarky Hillary column in response to Clinton's statement about using her husband as a roving ambassador if elected.

If I were going to guess who Dowd is supporting for 2008, I would say it's probably Rudy Giuliani. She loves all that tough talk stuff.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

It isn't just about food safety, either
Posted by Jill | 5:37 AM
Since 9/11/01, the Bush Administration's mantra has been that everything it does, that every botched military adventure (Afghanistan), every war based on lies (Iraq), every invasion of Americans' privacy, is in the name of "keeping us safe."

There's more to keeping Americans safe than stuffing your pockets with taxpayer cash from no-bid military contracts just lashing out at whatever country looks at you crosswise today. There are things like a food supply that's safe to eat and workplaces that are safe to go to every day. And on those fronts, the Bush Administration has shown time and time again that its focus is not on the Americans it says it wants to keep safe, but on the corporatists stuffing their pockets at the expense of Americans' safety. This bunch runs everything the way they run the military -- as long as Bush and Cheney and their cronies get even richer, the hell with everyone else.

The latest horror story: OSHA:


Seven years ago, a Missouri doctor discovered a troubling pattern at a microwave popcorn plant in the town of Jasper. After an additive was modified to produce a more buttery taste, nine workers came down with a rare, life-threatening disease that was ravaging their lungs.

Puzzled Missouri health authorities turned to two federal agencies in Washington. Scientists at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which investigates the causes of workplace health problems, moved quickly to examine patients, inspect factories and run tests. Within months, they concluded that the workers became ill after exposure to diacetyl, a food-flavoring agent.

But the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, charged with overseeing workplace safety, reacted with far less urgency. It did not step up plant inspections or mandate safety standards for businesses, even as more workers became ill.

On Tuesday, the top official at the agency told lawmakers at a Congressional hearing that it would prepare a safety bulletin and plan to inspect a few dozen of the thousands of food plants that use the additive.

That response reflects OSHA’s practices under the Bush administration, which vowed to limit new rules and roll back what it considered cumbersome regulations that imposed unnecessary costs on businesses and consumers. Across Washington, political appointees — often former officials of the industries they now oversee — have eased regulations or weakened enforcement of rules on issues like driving hours for truckers, logging in forests and corporate mergers.

Since George W. Bush became president, OSHA has issued the fewest significant standards in its history, public health experts say. It has imposed only one major safety rule. The only significant health standard it issued was ordered by a federal court.

The agency has killed dozens of existing and proposed regulations and delayed adopting others. For example, OSHA has repeatedly identified silica dust, which can cause lung cancer, and construction site noise as health hazards that warrant new safeguards for nearly three million workers, but it has yet to require them.

“The people at OSHA have no interest in running a regulatory agency,” said Dr. David Michaels, an occupational health expert at George Washington University who has written extensively about workplace safety. “If they ever knew how to issue regulations, they’ve forgotten. The concern about protecting workers has gone out the window.”


That's because American workers, like the soldiers George W. Bush insists on sending to their deaths rather than admit he was wrong about Iraq, are just so much cannon fodder so that corporate executives and Bush family cronies can stuff their pockets with ever-increasing amounts of cash. Business is about one thing: profits. And if profits can be maximized by putting employees at risk every day, then the hell with the employees.

Most Americans, even those who have allowed Republicans to focus their attention down the economic ladder at illegal immigrants while corporatists outsource their jobs, bust their unions, eliminate their raises, trash any workplace standards that ever existed, and withdraw their health coverage, still hold with great regard this notion of an American work ethic. By allowing corporations and those who run them a free hand to put the lives of their employees at risk in the name of profits, the Bush Administration and the rest of the Republicans who are trying to eliminate all regulatory agencies by making them stupendously ineffective, are spitting in the face of American workers every day.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, April 24, 2007

So now melamine is in the human food supply. Had enough of Republicanism yet?
Posted by Jill | 8:25 PM
Thousands of dead pets aren't enough for these people who want to drown government in the bathtub and let corporations run amok. Now the quest for ever-increasing profits has meat producers feedchickens and pigs adulterated grains on the cheap, even if it means people become sick or even die:

The Food and Drug Administration says it will, for the first time, test ingredients imported for use in the human food supply in connection with the nationwide pet food recall that has killed, by some estimates, thousands of pets.

In addition, the FDA on Tuesday announced plans to expand testing of the animal food supply after hogs on farms in three states were quarantined after testing positive for the substance at the center of the recall, the toxic agent melamine.

A poultry farm in Missouri is also being investigated, federal officials said.

Wheat gluten, corn gluten, corn meal, rice bran and rice protein are among the imported products being tested in both the animal and human food supply.


Had enough of "less government" yet?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

No, Jessica, you're wrong. You ARE a hero
Posted by Jill | 8:12 PM
You became one today when you testified before Congress and the American people that "the American people are capable of determining their own ideals for heroes. And they don't need to be told elaborate lies":





Here's another hero: A mother who understands all too well what war is and that painting this war as something glorious, something out of a John Wayne movie, is an atrocity:





Now for people who AREN'T heroes: The Christofascist ghouls who are increasingly taking over the military -- people like Lt. Col. Ralph Kauzlarich, whose disgusting remarks were repeated today by Mary Tillman:

"His parents continue to ask for it to be looked at," Kauzlarich said. "And that is really their prerogative. And if they have the right backing, the right powerful people in our government to continue to let it happen, then that is the case.

"But there [have] been numerous unfortunate cases of fratricide, and the parents have basically said, 'OK, it was an unfortunate accident.' And they let it go. So this is — I don't know, these people have a hard time letting it go. It may be because of their religious beliefs."

In a transcript of his interview with Brig. Gen. Gary Jones during a November 2004 investigation, Kauzlarich said he'd learned Kevin Tillman, Pat's brother and fellow Army Ranger who was a part of the battle the night Pat Tillman died, objected to the presence of a chaplain and the saying of prayers during a repatriation ceremony in Germany before his brother's body was returned to the United States.

Kauzlarich, now a battalion commanding officer at Fort Riley in Kansas, further suggested the Tillman family's unhappiness with the findings of past investigations might be because of the absence of a Christian faith in their lives.

In an interview with ESPN.com, Kauzlarich said: "When you die, I mean, there is supposedly a better life, right? Well, if you are an atheist and you don't believe in anything, if you die, what is there to go to? Nothing. You are worm dirt. So for their son to die for nothing, and now he is no more — that is pretty hard to get your head around that. So I don't know how an atheist thinks. I can only imagine that that would be pretty tough."

Asked by ESPN.com whether the Tillmans' religious beliefs are a factor in the ongoing investigation, Kauzlarich said, "I think so. There is not a whole lot of trust in the system or faith in the system [by the Tillmans]. So that is my personal opinion, knowing what I know."

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

More melamine in the pet food supply
Posted by Jill | 6:02 AM
More tainted rice protein from a second Chinese source has gotten into the American pet food supply -- and the FDA isn't telling American consumers which pet food manufacturers might be affected:

A second company likely imported rice protein from China that was contaminated with a chemical linked to a major pet food recall, two U.S. senators said on Monday.

Rice protein tainted with the chemical melamine was used in pet foods from at least five manufacturers who obtained the protein from one supplier, U.S. officials have said. It also made its way into feed used at a California hog farm.

Now, another company is suspected of importing rice protein from China, Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin of Illinois and Maria Cantwell of Washington said in a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

“We have learned that in addition to Wilbur-Ellis, a second United States company imported a shipment of rice protein from China that is also likely to be contaminated with melamine,” the senators wrote. “We request the FDA identify this second importer as well as those manufacturers to which it may have sold the contaminated product.”

An aide to Durbin said the senators found out about the second importer from industry sources.

The agency has said the rice protein was supplied by China-based Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd. but the company has denied involvement.

Last week, privately held Wilbur-Ellis said contaminated rice protein was distributed to several pet food makers. Three of them — Natural Balance Pet Foods, the Blue Buffalo Co. and Diamond Pet Foods — have pulled some of their products.

Wilbur-Ellis and the FDA declined to name the other two makers. Durbin and Cantwell called on the agency to make those two companies publicly known.


Meanwhile, kids in California have been sickened by E coli-tainted beef.

The FDA is still protecting corporations over consumers. This is what deregulation means. This is what "less government" does. This is what happens when you allow the "invisible hand" to control the market -- except that there is no invisible hand at work here. When consumers are not informed of the dangers in the food supply because the FDA is protecting the food manufacturers instead of consumers, Americans lack the information they need to punish manufacturers who use adulterated ingredients by withholding their business.

Conservatives will respond by saying that since the FDA doesn't work, it should be disbanded. And I'm sure this is the whole point of this exercise -- to demonstrate the FDA's incompetence so that it can be eliminated as a federal agency. Wouldn't it make more sense to provide oversight and ensure that it does its job properly?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

What about the dead in Iraq?
Posted by Jill | 5:50 AM
With the 24/7 newsotainment cycle only now beginning to emerge from its "All Virginia Tech, All The Time" coverage, is there any chance at all that Americans might start thinking about the young people who aren't college students -- the ones our president seems to have all but forgotten unless they can be used as political props?

Nine of them -- one-quarter of the Virginia Tech death toll -- died yesterday in a single suicide bombing:

A devastating suicide car bombing on Monday killed nine American soldiers near a patrol base in Diyala Province, the military announced early Tuesday morning.

It was one of the most lethal suicide bomb attacks on American troops in Iraq. Another occurred on Dec. 21, 2004, when a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest walked into a mess tent on an American base in Mosul and detonated his charge, killing 14 United States soldiers.

In the past six months, Diyala Province, where several Sunni Arab insurgent groups are active, has become one of the most dangerous places in Iraq for American soldiers.

Twenty soldiers and one Iraqi civilian were also wounded in the blast on Monday, the military said. Eight of the soldiers and the Iraqi civilian were evacuated to an allied medical center; the others returned to duty.

Later, three of the soldiers who were evacuated also returned to duty, according to a statement issued by the military. There was no other information available about the attack.

Other attacks in which large numbers of American military personnel have died include several instances in which insurgents shot down helicopters carrying numerous troops and one attack on United States marines serving in Anbar Province.

In that attack, on Aug. 3, 2005, a huge roadside bomb exploded near Haditha, killing 14 marines who were involved in combat operations and traveling in an amphibious vehicle.

On Monday, an American soldier also died in Muqdadiya when a roadside bomb exploded, the military said in a news release.

Across Iraq, five car bombs exploded Monday, killing a total of 22 people, and a suicide bomber wearing an explosive vest walked into a popular restaurant near Baghdad’s fortified International Zone, formerly known as the Green Zone, and detonated his explosives, killing six people.


That's nine American soldiers and 22 Iraqi civilians killed just yesterday -- one less than the Virginia Tech death toll.

I'm not trying to take away from the tragedy of young people cut down while sitting in college classrooms, nor am I trying to equate the risk of attending college with the risk of fighting in a war. But over the last week we've seen a president who has never attended a single soldier's funeral and who let a city drown before visiting it drop everything to attend a memorial for the Virginia Tech students. We've seen flags flown at half-staff for the slain students, while no flag has ever flown at half-staff for the over 3300 Americans killed in this misbegotten war. This president has never expressed any regret for the tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians who have lost their lives because he had to prove his manhood by invading a country that never attacked us. This president gives constant lip service to the sanctity of human life. But it's clear that the only human life he regards sacred is human life that benefits him politically.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

They did it twice. They'll try to do it again. Will we be ready? Will we even care?
Posted by Jill | 5:20 AM
We all know about the 93,000 people taken off the Florida voter rolls as felons in 2000 when they weren't. We know about Al Gore's negative vote count in one precinct. We know that George W. Bush became president as the result of a partisan Supreme Court decision. But far too many people think he barely squeaked out a legitimate victory in 2004.

Guess again:


Did the most powerful Republicans in America have the computer capacity, software skills and electronic infrastructure in place on Election Night 2004 to tamper with the Ohio results to ensure George W. Bush's re-election?

The answer appears to be yes. There is more than ample documentation to show that on Election Night 2004, Ohio's "official" Secretary of State website – which gave the world the presidential election results – was redirected from an Ohio government server to a group of servers that contain scores of Republican web sites, including the secret White House e-mail accounts that have emerged in the scandal surrounding Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s firing of eight federal prosecutors.

Recent revelations have documented that the Republican National Committee (RNC) ran a secret White House e-mail system for Karl Rove and dozens of White House staffers. This high-tech system used to count and report the 2004 presidential vote– from server-hosting contracts, to software-writing services, to remote-access capability, to the actual server usage logs themselves – must be added to the growing congressional investigations.

Numerous tech-savvy bloggers, starting with the online investigative consortium epluribusmedia.org and their November 2006 article cross-posted by contributor luaptifer to Dailykos, and Joseph Cannon's blog at Cannonfire.blogspot.com, outed the RNC tech network. That web-hosting firm is SMARTech Corp. of Chattanooga, TN, operating out of the basement in the old Pioneer Bank building. The firm hosts scores of Republican websites, including georgewbush.com, gop.com and rnc.org.

The software created for the Ohio secretary of state’s Election Night 2004 website was created by GovTech Solutions, a firm co-founded by longtime GOP computing guru Mike Connell. He also redesigned the Bush campaign's website in 2000 and told "Inside Business" magazine in 1999, "I wouldn't be where I am today without the Bush campaign and the Bush family because the Bushes truly are about family and I’m loyal to my network."

Ohio's Cedarville University, a Christian school with 3,100 students, issued a press release on January 13, 2005 describing how faculty member Dr. Alan Dillman’s computing company Government Consulting Resources, Ltd, worked with these Republican-connected companies to tally the vote on Election Night 2004.

"Dillman personally led the effort from the GCR side, teaming with key members of Blackwell's staff," the release said. "GCR teamed with several other firms – including key players such as GovTech Solutions, which performed the software development – to deliver the end result. SMARTech provided the backup and additional system capacity, and Mercury Interactive performed the stress testing."

On Election Night 2004, the Republican Party not only controlled the vote-counting process in Ohio, the final presidential swing state, through a secretary of state who was a co-chair of the Bush campaign, but it also controlled the technology that allowed the tally of the vote in Ohio's 88 counties to be reported to the media and voters.

Privatizing elections and allowing known partisans to run a key presidential vote count is troubling enough. But the reason Congress must investigate these high-tech ties is there is abundant evidence that Republicans could have used this computing network to delay announcing the winner of Ohio's 2004 election while tinkering with the results.

Did Ohio Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell or other GOP operatives inflate the president's vote totals to secure George W. Bush's margin of victory? On Election Night 2004, many of the totals reported by the Secretary of State were based on local precinct results that were impossible. In Clyde, Ohio, a Republican haven, Bush won big after 131 percent voter turnout. In Republican Perry County, two precincts came in at 124 percent and 120 percent respectively. In Gahanna Ward 1, precinct B, Bush received 4,258 votes despite the fact that only 638 people voted for president. In Concord Southwest in Miami County, the certified election results proudly proclaimed at 679 out of 689 registered voters cast ballots, a 98.55 percent turnout. FreePress.org later found that only 547 voters had signed in.

These strange election results were routed by county election officials through Ohio's Secretary of State's office, through partisan IT providers and software, and the final results were hosted out of a computer based in Tennessee announcing the winner. The Cedarville University releases boasted the system "was running like a champ." It said, "The system kept running through the early morning hours as users from around the world looked to Ohio for their election results."

All the facts are not in, but enough is known to warrant a serious congressional inquiry. Beginning with a timeline on Election Night after a national media consortium exit poll predicted Democrat John Kerry would win Ohio, the first Ohio returns were from the state's Democratic urban strongholds, showing Kerry in the lead.

This was the case until shortly after midnight on Wednesday, Nov. 3, when for roughly 90 minutes the Ohio election results reported on the Secretary of State's website were frozen. Shortly before 2am EST election returns came in from a handful of the state's rural Republican enclaves, bumping Bush's numbers over the top.

It was known Bush would carry rural Ohio. But the vote totals from these last-to-report counties, where Karl Rove said there was an unprecedented late-hour evangelical vote giving the White House a moral mandate, were highly improbable and suggested vote count fraud to pad Bush’s numbers. Just how flimsy the reported GOP totals were was not known on Election Night and has not been examined by the national media. But an investigation by the House Judiciary Committee Democratic staff begun after Election Day 2004 and completed before the Electoral College met on Jan. 6, 2005, was first to publicly point to vote count fraud in rural Ohio.


At this late date, not even I am calling for a "do-over" of 2004. But just like terrorists, to paraphrase George W. Bush, the Republicans are innovative and resourceful, and never stop trying to come up with new ways of using technology to avoid accountability rules -- and to rig elections. The so-called "lost e-mails" are a test case for the Democrats. If they blow it on this one, don't expect a fair election in 2008. Most Democrats aren't as technologically illiterate as Ted "Series of Tubes" Stevens. But how much they actually understand, despite the many computer scientists and investigative journalists who have devoted the last six years to this problem, remains to be seen. The problem goes far beyond touch-screen voting. Will we vigilant?

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Monday, April 23, 2007

We are so screwed
Posted by Jill | 9:42 AM
The loss of honeybees would seem to be a relatively insignificant development as part of climate change, were it not for the fact that 1/3 of the U.S. diet depends on pollination:

Go to work, come home.

Go to work, come home.

Go to work -- and vanish without a trace.

Billions of bees have done just that, leaving the crop fields they are supposed to pollinate, and scientists are mystified about why.

The phenomenon was first noticed late last year in the United States, where honeybees are used to pollinate $15 billion worth of fruits, nuts and other crops annually. Disappearing bees have also been reported in Europe and Brazil.

Commercial beekeepers would set their bees near a crop field as usual and come back in two or three weeks to find the hives bereft of foraging worker bees, with only the queen and the immature insects remaining. Whatever worker bees survived were often too weak to perform their tasks.

If the bees were dying of pesticide poisoning or freezing, their bodies would be expected to lie around the hive. And if they were absconding because of some threat -- which they have been known to do -- they wouldn't leave without the queen.

Since about one-third of the U.S. diet depends on pollination and most of that is performed by honeybees, this constitutes a serious problem, according to Jeff Pettis of the U.S. Agricultural Research Service.

"They're the heavy lifters of agriculture," Pettis said of honeybees. "And the reason they are is they're so mobile and we can rear them in large numbers and move them to a crop when it's blooming."

Honeybees are used to pollinate some of the tastiest parts of the American diet, Pettis said, including cherries, blueberries, apples, almonds, asparagus and macadamia nuts.

"It's not the staples," he said. "If you can imagine eating a bowl of oatmeal every day with no fruit on it, that's what it would be like" without honeybee pollination.

Pettis and other experts are gathering outside Washington for a two-day workshop starting on Monday to pool their knowledge and come up with a plan of action to combat what they call colony collapse disorder.

"What we're describing as colony collapse disorder is the rapid loss of adult worker bees from the colony over a very short period of time, at a time in the season when we wouldn't expect a rapid die-off of workers: late fall and early spring," Pettis said.


While it's undetermined whether Einstein's famous quote about mankind having about four more years after the honeybees are gone is in fact attributable to Einstein, we know enough about pollination to know that if it doesn't happen, a lot of crops are in serious trouble.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

How Republicans planned to rig elections as more states banned touch-screen voting
Posted by Jill | 5:55 AM
I'll say this much for the bunch of criminals in the White House. They prove that George Bush revealed much about how his Administration works on August 5, 2004 when he said:


Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.


Nor do they ever stop thinking about new ways to disenfranchise those voters they believe most likely to vote Democratic:

For six years, the Bush administration, aided by Department of Justice political appointees, has pursued an aggressive legal effort to restrict voter turnout in key battleground states in ways that favor Republican political candidates.

The administration intensified its efforts last year as President George W. Bush’s popularity and Republican support eroded heading into a midterm battle for control of Congress, which the Democrats won.

Facing nationwide voter registration drives by Democratic-leaning groups, the administration alleged widespread election fraud and endorsed proposals for tougher state and federal voter identification laws. Presidential political adviser Karl Rove alluded to the strategy last April when he railed about voter fraud in a speech to the Republican National Lawyers Association.

Questions about the administration’s campaign against alleged voter fraud have helped fuel the political tempest over the firings last year of eight U.S. attorneys, several of whom were ousted in part because they failed to bring voter fraud cases important to Republican politicians.

Civil rights advocates charge the administration’s policies were intended to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of poor and minority voters who tend to support Democrats. By filing state and federal lawsuits, civil rights groups have won court rulings blocking some of its actions.

[snip[

Since President Bush’s first attorney general, John Ashcroft, a former Republican senator from Missouri, launched a “Ballot Access and Voter Integrity Initiative” in 2001, justice department political appointees have exhorted U.S. attorneys to prosecute voter fraud cases and the department’s Civil Rights Division has sought to roll back policies to protect minority voting rights.

On virtually every significant decision affecting election balloting since 2001, the division’s Voting Rights Section has come down on the side of Republicans, notably in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Washington and other states where recent elections have been decided by narrow margins.

Joseph Rich, who left his job as chief of the section in 2005, said these events formed an unmistakable pattern.

“As more information becomes available about the administration’s priority on combating alleged, but not well-substantiated, voter fraud, the more apparent it is that its actions concerning voter ID laws are part of a partisan strategy to suppress the votes of poor and minority citizens,” he said.


When the problems of touch-screen voting began finally to enter the public consciousness, this adminstration took the term "vote fraud", which widely meant deliberately tossed votes and voting machines that flipped votes as part of their inner workings, and added an "r" to it and made it "voter fraud", which allowed them to zero in on those most likely to vote against them and least likely to kick up a fuss about it.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share