"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, March 05, 2005

The Bush Administration: Screwing Over Americans since 2000®
Posted by Jill | 9:30 PM

This morning I was listening to the Morning Sedition weekend reruns, specifically a discussion on the giant blowjob to the banking industry that is the bankruptcy bill currently being bulldozed through Congress by Republicans.

This bill is a travesty, and any middle class American who supports it ought to have his/her head examined. The Bush Administration is selling this bill as a means to crack down on abuse of the bankruptcy system; focusing on the example of the spendthrift who spends nineteen cards up to the limit and then files for bankruptcy so he can be a deadbeat.

But as Kevin Drum points out, amendments to the bill that would have exempted those who end up bankrupt through no fault of their own, either because of illness, divorce, or other disasters, have been summarily dismissed by Republicans. Those proposed exemptions include:

From Russ Feingold, an amendment that would have allowed senior citizens to protect $75,000 of the value of their homes during bankruptcy proceedings.

From Ted Kennedy, an amendment focused on helping people who are forced into bankruptcy due to major medical expenses.

Also from Ted Kennedy, an amendment that would have protected $150,000 of the value of patients' homes from being seized to pay creditors.

From Daniel Akaka, an amendment to force credit card companies to disclose how long it would take a consumer to pay off his bill making minimum monthly payments, and what the interest rate would be.

From Dick Durbin, an amendment that would have exempted veterans from the most onerous provisions of the bill and prevented creditors from recovering debts from military personnel if the loans had annual percentage rates higher than 36%.


An exemption that's being allowed to stay? You guessed it:

What loopholes have been left in the bill? Answer: the bill does nothing to address the growing use of "asset protection trusts," used by rich people to shield income from bankruptcy proceedings, or to rein in the unlimited use of the homestead exemption, which allows them to shield multimillion dollar homes from bankruptcy courts.


One caller to the show was a fellow who had emergency open-heart surgery and then his insurance company refused to pay on the grounds that the heart condition which was diagnosed when he didn't feel well was a "pre-existing condition." The hospital sued him for $280,000. He hired an attorney, and the insurance company ended up settling with the doctors and hospitals for far less than they would have had to pay up by covering the cost. Under this bill, this fellow would NOT be able to seek any redress. He'd have to pony up the $280,000 if they had to take his house to do it.

As the policy journal Health Affairs reports:

In 2001, 1.458 million American families filed for bankruptcy. To investigate medical contributors to bankruptcy, we surveyed 1,771 personal bankruptcy filers in five federal courts and subsequently completed in-depth interviews with 931 of them. About half cited medical causes, which indicates that 1.9–2.2 million Americans (filers plus dependents) experienced medical bankruptcy. Among those whose illnesses led to bankruptcy, out-of-pocket costs averaged $11,854 since the start of illness; 75.7 percent had insurance at the onset of illness. Medical debtors were 42 percent more likely than other debtors to experience lapses in coverage. Even middle-class insured families often fall prey to financial catastrophe when sick.

[snip]

More than one-quarter cited illness or injury as a specific reason for bankruptcy; a similar number reported uncovered medical bills exceeding $1,000. Some debtors cited more than one medical contributor. Nearly half (46.2 percent) (95 percent confidence interval = 43.5, 48.9) of debtors met at least one of our criteria for “major medical bankruptcy.” Slightly more than half (54.5 percent) (95 percent CI = 51.8, 57.2) met criteria for “any medical bankruptcy.”

[snip]

In our follow-up telephone interviews with 931 debtors, they reported substantial privations. During the two years before filing, 40.3 percent had lost telephone service; 19.4 percent had gone without food; 53.6 percent had gone without needed doctor or dentist visits because of the cost; and 43.0 percent had failed to fill a prescription, also because of the cost. Medical debtors experienced more problems in access to care than other debtors did; three-fifths went without a needed doctor or dentist visit, and nearly half failed to fill a prescription.


So there's the bill that Republicans are going to force down the throats of all Americans. That's what we all have to look forward to. Think about it....The next big Republican push after they succeed in dismantling Social Security will be to dismantle the health care system. They're already pushing a plan in which health care will be removed from the employment system (not altogether a bad thing), but it will be replaced by a system in which individuals will be required to purchase catastrophic illness insurance, but for everything else, you'll pay out of pocket from tax-free health savings accounts. If you're too poor to afford to put money away after paying your rent and food and to clothe your kids, too bad for you. You can lay down and die for all they care.

Another benefit for the wealthy in this bankruptcy bill will be that you will no longer be able to keep your home in the event of bankruptcy -- your creditors will be able to take your house and put you out on the street.

Funny, isn't it, how these so-called "Christians" who run the Republican party hate Darwinism when it comes to scientific study, but they just LOVE Darwinism when it's applied to socioeconomic policy....especially when it means the rich will be able to loot what little people have left in the event of misfortune.

UPDATE: Via Factesque, we hear of an amendment being proposed by Charles Schumer that would specifically bar anti-abortion groups from filing for bankruptcy as a way to avoid paying damages assessed by courts. Interesting that this is even necessary; that Republicans want Americans who lose their jobs, are abandoned by their spouses, or have catastrophic medical expenses, to be utterly screwed for the rest of their lives, but let's not make it hard for anti-abortion activists.

Assholes.
Bookmark and Share

No doubt about it; this is ILLEGAL. Where is the outrage?
Posted by Jill | 9:23 PM

If Clinton had tried to do this, the Articles of Impeachment would be being drawn up even as we speak.

A new Social Security (news - web sites) war room inside the Treasury Department (news - web sites) is pumping out information to sell President Bush (news - web sites)'s plan, much like any political campaign might do. It's part of a coordinated effort by the Bush administration.

The internal, taxpayer-funded campaigning is backed up by television advertisements, grass-roots organizing and lobbying from business and other groups that support the Bush plan.


This is blatantly and profoundly ILLEGAL:

Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-199, div. F, title VI, § 624, 118 Stat. 3, 356 (Jan. 23, 2004) (fiscal year 2004); Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-7, div. J, title VI, § 626, 117 Stat. 11, 470 (Feb. 20, 2003) (fiscal year 2003); and Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-67, § 626, 115 Stat. 514, 552 (Nov. 12, 2001) (fiscal year 2002).

The language of these provisions is identical: "No part of any appropriation contained in this or any other Act shall be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States not heretofore authorized by the Congress."


Does anyone care anymore? And if not, WHY NOT?????
Bookmark and Share

Wow.
Posted by Jill | 8:59 PM

Just go read this amazing story. I have nothing to add.
Bookmark and Share

God, what a moron....
Posted by Jill | 8:52 PM

"I like doing this, by the way - I like going around the country, saying, 'Folks, we have got a problem.' " -- George W. Bush, Westfield, NJ, March 4, 2005 (source: New York Times)
Bookmark and Share

Any Adobe Acrobat gurus out there?
Posted by Jill | 7:07 AM
Brilliant at Breakfast®: Using the Power of the Internet To Scrounge Up Free Tech Support Since 2004.

But seriously, folks, can any of you fine readers explain why a calculated field on an Acrobat form would suddenly start concatening the values in its component fields instead of adding them together? On the day the project is being moved to production? And why replacing the calculation Javascript in that field with the Javascript in another field that does something similar, then changing the field values in the code as required, would solve the problem?
Bookmark and Share

I saw Satan buying a snowblower at Home Depot
Posted by Jill | 6:47 AM

This may be the most astounding piece of video you'll see all year. It shows Bob "Prince of Darkness" Novak actually correcting himself for a LIE he came out with earlier in the week.

Novak had claimed that no less a liberal icon than Howard Dean had claimed a week ago that if Social Security was not addressed now, benefits would lose 80% of their present value in thirty years.

What Dean ACTUALLY said, in a speech at Cornell University, was that if Social Security were left alone for 30 years, its benefits would be reduced to 80 percent of what they are now.

Novakula, of course, did NOT mention that Dean had also said:

"I think that privatizing Social Security has much more to do with the enormous amount of money that corporate Wall Street poured into the President of the United States's campaign than [helping] senior citizens," Dean said. "[Social Security] was a response toward [overcoming] abject poverty...it is not meant as a retirement program...it was meant as a social safety net for people who had reached the end of their working careers and did not deserve, after a long lifetime of dignified work, to live in poverty. ... It's not supposed to be a pension."


What surprises me is that there was enough to take out of context in what Dean DID say that he didn't have to resort to outright lying (or displaying his own stupidity, take yer pick). He COULD have said "It's not supposed to be a pension", and said that Dean had alluded to the fact that people also have to save for their own retirement, and accomplished the same thing (even though what Dean means is that Social Security is that thing wingnuts hate most -- a social safety net to ensure that aged Americans can live in something approaching dignity. (Amazing how conservatives have no problem with old people being penniless and living on the street, and they call themselves "pro-life". I guess being old and homeless is regarded by them as a just punishment for not making it in their Darwinist vision. And by the way, while we're on the subject, how come wingnuts reject Darwin when it flies in the face of the Bible, but embrace him on social policy? Just wondering.)

But a chastened Novak appeared with the equally whorish Judy Woodruff on Inside Politics the other day and issued a correction. Crooks and Liars has the video.

(And if you can spare a few shekels, you might want to toss them into C&L's tip jar. Scroll down the right-hand column till you see the "make a donation" button. C&L is the best source around for those priceless clips most of us don't have time to watch, let alone record, and bandwidth costs money. And while you're at it, why not toss some in John Aravosis' direction as well. Without him, a hooker would still be sitting in the White House press room every day uttering polemics disguised as questions. He's about as close to an investigative reporter as we have right now.)

Anyway, of course, since he's Bob Novak, he still had to get in his "I was right anyway" moment, by saying that Dean was still not toeing the party line.

He IS still Bob Novak, after all.
Bookmark and Share
Friday, March 04, 2005

Welcome Home, Martha
Posted by Jill | 7:34 AM
Martha Stewart may be the most polarizing figure of our time whose name is not George Walker Bush. Either you loved her or you hated her.

I always fell into the latter category. The last thing I, a mediocre housekeeper at best, wanted to hear was some multikazillionaire telling me to grow my own herbs. I remember channel surfing once and watching an astounded Julia Child asking Martha Stewart in that wonderful, affable deadpan she had, whether painting a blush on handmade marzipan cherries was really worth the trouble.

When faced with a choice between dusting or going to the movies, the movie always wins out. Life is just too damn short to spend all your leisure time cleaning.

Martha Stewart was the original patron saint of the kind of overstressed supermoms who were the subject of a recent Newsweek article. Yeah, just what we need. More pressure.

But when Martha Stewart was convicted of refusing to acknowledge guilt in the timing of her sale of ImClone stock, at a time when Kenny-Boy Lay, Bernie Ebbers, Scott Sullivan, and the rest of the corporate crooks who caused hundreds of thousands of people to lose all of their retirement money, and in many cases, their jobs, it became clear that this was a Federal witch hunt against a relatively small player who just happened to be a Democrat....sort of like impeaching a Democratic president for a blowjob while a Republican president gets a free pass for lying to the American people to justify a war.

So today Martha Stewart goes home, and this former Martha-hater is cheering. I'm not the only one, either. Shares of Martha Stewart Omnimedia have been rallying of late, and rather than being a pariah, she will go back to running the company after her release from home confinement, AND she'll get her own version of The Apprentice. And there are a bunch of people like me, former Martha-haters, who are now cheering, "You go, girl!"

Dorothy Parker was right. Living well truly IS the best revenge.
Bookmark and Share

Friday Cat Blogging
Posted by Jill | 7:21 AM
It's never too early to train for the Olympics. Maggie and Jenny work on their synchronized snoozing.



Bookmark and Share
Thursday, March 03, 2005

I KNEW I was too immature to be this old
Posted by Jill | 9:26 PM




You Are 24 Years Old



24





Under 12: You are a kid at heart. You still have an optimistic life view - and you look at the world with awe.

13-19: You are a teenager at heart. You question authority and are still trying to find your place in this world.

20-29: You are a twentysomething at heart. You feel excited about what's to come... love, work, and new experiences.

30-39: You are a thirtysomething at heart. You've had a taste of success and true love, but you want more!

40+: You are a mature adult. You've been through most of the ups and downs of life already. Now you get to sit back and relax.


Bookmark and Share

Oh, shit.
Posted by Jill | 5:11 PM

I've always been blessed with excellent health; something I took for granted until this year, the year in which I'll officially pass the half-century mark (yikes).

I spent this morning wrapped in a white terrycloth robe, in a room full of other anxious women in identical terrycloth robes, in that ritual of middle-aged femaledom known as "We need to take some more films."

Because of a shortage of radiologists, the excellent facility where I go annually for what I call the "Boobie Smash" often can't have mammography films read the same day, so instead they give you an ominous-sounding phone call a few days later telling you that you have to come back so they can smash you into a pancake yet again.

If you're lucky, you walk out of there bruised and battered, but with a nice sheet of paper that says you should come back in a year for your next scheduled screening. If you're not so lucky, the prescription they require that must include "ultrasound and FNA [fine needle aspiration] if necessary" kicks in.

I was lucky today.

I'm not much of one to follow the lives of celebrities. I do the whole clothes/dish thing three times a year (Golden Globes, Independent Spirit Awards, and Oscars), but other than that, I couldn't care less about how celebrities live.

But the news that Scott Hamilton, figure skater extraordinaire and all-around good guy, is now battling craniopharyngioma, a slow-growing, benign, non-cancerous brain tumor in the region of the pituitary gland, after beating testicular cancer seven years ago and returning to skating that same year, kinda knocked me flat today.

I used to follow figure skating avidly, until the Kerrigan/Harding incident turned it into a circus. I watched in 1984 as this skinny little kid beat out David Santee, a skater whose style I preferred, for the Olympic gold medal. In the early 1990's, I did some marketing, desktop publishing and database work for Ice Theatre of New York, and from all accounts, the "nice guy" demeanor we saw from this guy on TV is the real thing.

As far as I'm concerned, Hamilton may be the most influential man in skating history, Dick Button notwithstanding. From creating the "Stars on Ice" shows that showcased individual talent not encased in a Disney costume to being an advocate for cancer research through efforts such as the Scott Hamilton CARES Initiative, this elfin, prematurely balding man with his ever-present humor, unbelievable footwork, and gleefully corny choreography, is impossible for even a cynic like me to dislike. This isn't just a great skater, this is an amazing human being, and if he's reading this, I hope he knows that I, along with everyone who's followed his career, am hoping for his full recovery.
Bookmark and Share

Journalists Held Hostage: Day Two
Posted by Jill | 5:54 AM

FishbowlDC has been trying to obtain the same kind of day pass to White House press briefings that Gannonguckert received EVERY DAY for two years, so far to no avail. Day One had him showing up in person. On Day Two, he works the phones -- still to no avail. Stay tuned; we'll provide ongoing coverage of the White House Stonewalling of Non-Whores as it happens.
Bookmark and Share

Now THIS is what an opposition party does
Posted by Jill | 5:47 AM

Looks like some Democrats dusted off those dusty old books on Being an Opposition Party, because they're going to force Republicans to go on record about investigating the Gannonguckert/Plame outing connection:


House Democrats say they will force a vote in the House Judiciary Committee to put the Republican majority on the record with regards to investigating discredited White House correspondent Jeff Gannon who allegedly had access to confidential information, including a memorandum naming CIA operative Valerie Plame, RAW STORY has learned.

The procedure, called a Resolution of Inquiry, will be directed to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and departing Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge, senior House aides say. Ridge has jurisdiction over the Secret Service, which is responsible for presidential security; Gonzales oversees the FBI, whose databases are used for criminal background checks.

The resolution requests all documents on how Gannon was personally cleared and repeatedly allowed access to the White House, aides tell RAW STORY. It also calls for any information the departments have on White House policies about how an applicant would go about getting clearance in general.


This lays the ground for some nice attack ads to be run against these morally relative Republicans, who think it's perfectly OK to reveal the names of CIA agents, give press passes to hookers if they pass the wingnut test, and don't give a shit about national security.

THIS is how Republicans play the game, and it's time our side did too.
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, March 02, 2005

Bamboozlepalooza is coming to NJ
Posted by Jill | 5:17 PM

I grew up largely in Westfield, NJ. It's your archetypal suburban town; with a reasonably thriving downtown area that's been largely taken over by chain stores, a movie theatre, restaurants, and not enough parking. It's fairly diverse, with many older homes occupied by middle-class folks, newer (1950's vintage) houses on the far fringes of town, one street that used to be a pretty tumbledown ghetto, which has been improved since I was in high school, and a couple of extremely wealthy sections, such as the Wychwood section, which is about as close to a gated community as you can get without an actual gate. When I was growing up, the story was that at one time, there was a sign right under the Wychwood sign that read "No n-----s, Jews, or dogs allowed."

Which kind of says it all. Needless to say, Westfield is a pretty Republican town; one of those picture-book towns that looks nice and genteel, until someone rocks the boat. When I was a kid, there was a big to-do one year about the high school's Christmas tableau. This was a bunch of kids posing as the nativity, while the school orchestra and choir played and sang Christmas songs. It wasn't the songs that were the issue, or even Jesus On Stage. It was because in order to be in the orchestra or the choir, you were REQUIRED to participate in this. Now the obvious thing to do would have been to exempt the Jewish kids, and anyone else who had a problem with this, from the Christmas tableau, and let them participate in the other programs. But no, instead they killed the Christmas tableau.

Well.

Suddenly there were anti-Semitic letters in the town paper, and organized boycotts of Jewish-owned stores, and even some stores with swastikas spray-painted in their windows, before it all died down.

Sounds sort of like today, doesn't it?

I don't go to Westfield much, mostly because I was pretty unhappy there, and I have no real reason to go back. But Westfield is in the news because George W. "Brother Justin Crowe" Bush is bringing his Social Security Bamboozlepalooza there on Friday, to spread his Gospel of dismantling Social Security to the masses.

Except that the masses are going to be pre-screened to be a kind of Stepford flotilla of Jeff Gannons:

Don't let the growing cadre of dark-suited men in Westfield alarm you. President Bush is appearing at the Westfield Armory Friday morning to discuss Social Security reform, and his Secret Service agents are already showing up.

But his suited guards are probably the most you'll see of the president.

Some 1,500 audience members were hand-picked by the White House, or received invitations doled out by local office-holders and organizations.

Bush has been traveling the country to try to build support for his proposal that would allow workers to put some of their Social Security taxes into private accounts.

Rep. Michael Ferguson (R-7th Dist.), who invited Bush to Westfield, said Friday's event will be "a conversation."

"He wants to speak to, listen to and talk to residents from around the state," Ferguson said.

The lone Democrat on the town's nine-member council objected to a town hall-style meeting being run like a campaign visit, with supporters packing the crowd.

"If the event is being billed as a town hall meeting for the purpose of eliciting views on one of his policy initiatives, there would be an expectation that people having differing views may be in attendance," Councilman Lawrence Goldman said.

But the public "hasn't been informed about how individuals can be selected to attend," Goldman said.

Most of the passes are being given out by the White House, according to Ferguson.


Given that people who aren't toadies can't get the kind of day passes to the White House Press Briefings that JimmyJeff Gannonguckert did, I don't know why anyone would think that those who don't worship C-Plus Caligula would be welcome.
Bookmark and Share

You think giving the Christofascists their way on abortion will shut them up?
Posted by Jill | 1:22 PM

Guess again.

Rev. Mark H. Creech, Agape Press:

The question I now have concerns those who own, operate and work in the retail drug establishments. What happens if a pharmacist elects not to sell the morning-after pill -- high doses of hormones that can kill the human embryo early, before it implants in the uterus. If over-the-counter sales of the drug become legal, will they be forced to provide it?

Amazingly, pharmacists across the country are already dealing with this issue because they have decided not to fill birth-control pills of any kind. Late last year, CBS News featured one such pharmacist in Louisiana, Lloyd Duplantis.

The Christian Action League recently spoke with Mr. Duplantis about his decision not to fill birth-control prescriptions. We wanted to know how the exposure on CBS News had affected him and his business. Duplantis said he had heard nothing but encouragement for his stand. "The local community has been very supportive," he said. "It's really been quite overwhelming. They seem to understand very clearly my motives are not just religious, although they're religious based, but I'm concerned that these are dangerous chemicals that can kill, maim or destroy either the person taking them or their unborn child."

"This is the same issue that's being raised about VIOXX," Duplantis added. "We don't have an issue with controlling fertility; we are just saying that the pill is destroying people."

Duplantis belongs to an organization known as Pharmacists for Life International, an association of pharmacy professionals that is exclusively pro-life. The organization's motto is: "Let the gift of medicines promote life, not destroy life."

It's unfortunate, but you can believe if Duplantis had received attention on CBS News for refusing to fill a prescription for VIOXX, because he was concerned for a patient's health, he would have been hailed as a national hero. But because he refuses to provide drugs that are dangerous abortifaciants, CBS News portrayed him as an intolerant religious bigot who forces his religious views onto health care.

Duplantis agrees the issue is politically fueled. "I'm raising this issue because it's dangerous, but they're hearing 'birth control, Catholic church, religion,'" he said. "I'm trying to say 'dangerous' while they're saying 'religious fanatic.'"

According to Pharmacists for Life's website, the organization has over 1,600 professional members and hundreds of lay supporters. Pharmacists for Life was birthed in part because of the number of pharmacists who are facing legal action for refusing to fill birth-control pills on the basis of religious and moral objections. With the morning-after pill already on the scene -- and the possibility it may soon become almost as simple to buy as aspirin -- members of the organization are deeply concerned about legal action that may be forthcoming against their colleagues, if they refuse to provide the medication.

For instance, Pharmacists for Life is currently following the case of Neil Noesen, a pharmacist in Wisconsin, who in 2002 worked as an independent contractor at a K-Mart pharmacy and refused to refill a woman's birth-control prescription because it was against his religion. Amazingly, Wisconsin responded by trying to take away Noesen's license to dispense medication in that state.

Because of such cases, and the potential for others like it, Pharmacists for Life is calling for federal and state lawmakers to pass "conscience clause" legislation that would protect the rights of pharmacists who wish to avoid dispensing hormone-containing birth-control pills, which can operate by abortive means -- that is, by taking a human life.


Sorry, folks, but if you don't want to dispense birth control pills, don't become a pharmacist. It is not a pharmacist's job to decide what prescriptions he/she will or won't fill. This is bullshit. This is NOT about women's safety, it's about female chastity, just as everything else in the Christofascist briefcase is....frightened little men with small penises who are so afraid of women that they hate female sexuality and love war (see previous post about the anxious masculine posturing of the Bush Administration).

We all sell out a bit when we go to work. I used to work for a company that had the manufacturer of Hummers as a client. It's up to us as individuals to determine how much selling out we can handle and still look at ourselves in the mirror. If these pharmacists can't handle dispensing birth control pills, which are LEGAL MEDICATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES, then they should choose another profession.

Period.
Bookmark and Share

Another reason Hillary Clinton is the WRONG choice for 2008
Posted by Jill | 12:31 PM

If the Democratic Party can't come up with someone better for 2008, we are in deep shit indeed:

Hillary Clinton made it apparent where she stood on outsourcing during her India visit, in an attempt perhaps to clear the Indian misgivings received during the Kerry campaign. "There is no way to legislate against reality. Outsourcing will continue," she told an audience of Indian big-wigs. She pointed out that there were 3 billion people who feel left behind and are trying to attack the modern world in the hope of turning the clock back on globalization. "It is not far-fetched to imagine ... if the Indian miracle would be the one of choice of those who feel left behind," said Hillary.

Hillary has been at the forefront in defending free trade and outsourcing. During the height of the anti-outsourcing backlash in the US last year, she faced considerable flak for defending Indian software giant Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) for opening a center in Buffalo, New York. "We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences," Hillary said firmly, despite inevitably invoking the ire of the anti-free trade brigade.

Hillary further clarified her position during her recent visit as well as solutions that could be beneficial to both countries. She urged Indian industries to invest more in the US to allay negative outpourings over outsourcing of American jobs to India. "I have to be frank. People in my country are losing their jobs and the US policymakers need to address this issue," she said. She ruled out that the anti-India feeling was a reflexive reaction, and explained that the feeling was more because of the imbalance in trade between the two countries, which in turn caused anguish among Americans about the nature of the economic relationship.

"In 2003, US merchandise exports to India was $5 billion, while India exports to the US was $13.8 billion. Though the US understood that the economic vibrancy of India was in its own interest, there are people who feel left behind and might stir up negative feelings against India because they do not understand the economic benefits of outsourcing," Clinton remarked.

"If the feeling was to be arrested, Indian companies should invest more in the US to create a balance in trade relations," she said. Hillary added that she had personally wooed Indian companies to establish partnerships with American counterparts. "In June 2002, TCS partnered with the University of Buffalo to bring patented research to the market place. I would like to see more of such partnerships," she said.


Yeah, like THAT's gonna happen. There is a company called Cognizant, headquartered in Teaneck, NJ. Cognizant is in the business of outsourcing, primarily to India, and it's growing by leaps and bounds. Cognizant's CEO likes to crow about the "hundreds of jobs" here in the U.S. his company is creating, at the same time as he is facilitating putting tens of thousands of American IT workers out of work.

If Hillary Clinton thinks this is an adequate trade-off, and that Democratic voters will buy into it, she's got another guess coming. If she's the nominee, THIS particular Democratic voter will stay home. Because I can get screwed over just fine by the Republicans, thank you very much, I don't need my own team twisting the knife.
Bookmark and Share

The Bush Administration as Scared Little Men With Castration Anxiety
Posted by Jill | 12:27 PM

Check out this Buzzflash interview with Stephen J. Ducat (great name), author of The Wimp Factor: Gender Gaps, Holy Wars, and the Politics of Anxious Masculinity.

I think he's on to something here; something that explains a lot, from the right's rabid hatred of Hillary Clinton for reasons OTHER than that she's perfectly willing to sell Americans down the river for political expediency; to why the White House embraces gay men like Gannonguckert at the same time as want to crush others into oblivion.

Excerpts:


I also saw the Republican National Convention as essentially a hyper-masculine strut-fest. The real point of the convention was to make John Kerry their woman. That’s what they wanted to do. They had already done that with John Edwards by dubbing him the “Breck girl.” And Arnold Schwarzenegger went on to proclaim that any men who were anxious about the loss of jobs under the reign of George W. Bush were, as he put it, “economic girlie-men.” The inference was that Democratic candidates who were always whining about pink slips may as well be wearing pink slips. Real men, you know, don’t worry about the losers in the new global Darwinian economy.

[snip]

BuzzFlash: To cooperate, then, is to give up one’s masculine prerogative to assert oneself as a male leader?

Stephen J. Ducat: Absolutely. In the world they live in, you’re either a top or a bottom. Mutuality, democracy, equality--that makes no sense to them.

BuzzFlash: Well, as Jon Stewart said recently in the context of the John Gannon/Jeff Guckert scandal in Washington, if you’re on top, you’re not gay. That may explain the inner circle acceptance of gays within the Republican Party, in spite of the gay-bashing national political line they give to their followers.

Stephen J. Ducat: The Republican homosexuals are not only honorary heterosexuals; they become honorary homophobes, as the most recent scandal illustrated.

BuzzFlash: Well, you know, Matt Drudge is gay and yet engages in homophobia. Ken Mehlman, who is the head of the RNC, is reportedly gay and was a leader of the homophobic charge. There are numerous Congressman who have been outed and Senators who are known as gay, and yet who stick to the homophobic line. It’s a strange permutation of anxious masculinity, but maybe, as Jon Stewart said, if you’re on top, you’re not gay.

Stephen J. Ducat: He has intuited something that is actually pervasive across cultures and across historical time--that in male-dominant cultures, homosexuality is only taboo when it’s perceived as feminizing. This has its foundation in ancient Greece, where it didn’t really matter who you had sex with. What mattered was what position you occupied in the relationship of domination. If you were a penetrator, you were an unambiguous guy. If you were penetrated, you were virtually a woman. That dynamic operates in American prisons, and it operates in Middle Eastern cultures. It’s really a question of domination.

BuzzFlash: So with Gannon, who said on his web sites, you know, that he was a military guy, a Marine, and always on top, he’s acceptable because he’s a man’s man?

Stephen J. Ducat: Yeah.

BuzzFlash: He’s not penetrated; he penetrates.

Stephen J. Ducat: That’s right. Militarystud.com.

[snip]

Stephen J. Ducat: ...Hillary Clinton has been seen alternately as a castrating woman, the engulfing mother, or a phallic, penetrating woman. Some people may feel I'm kind of going over the top with Freudian metaphors, but I’m not making it up. One of the covers of Spy Magazine actually put a penis on her.

This is why political campaigns work so hard at presenting their male candidates as phallic. But the interesting thing about the phallus as a symbol is that it moves around, unlike the penis, it isn’t really attached. This is something I document in the representations of Bill and Hillary Clinton. For a while, Hillary was literally portrayed as having the phallus. There were cartoons of her using a men’s urinal, and cartoons of her dressed as a man. The Monica Lewinsky scandal was an interesting development precisely because it shifted the phallus from Hillary to Bill. In fact, the popularity of both Bill and Hillary Clinton went up dramatically as a result of the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which may seem kind of paradoxical for some.


I don't sleep any better knowing that this country is being run by men who have this level of castration anxiety. There are therapists who can help with this sort of thing.
Bookmark and Share

And V.C. Andrews continues to write from beyond the grave
Posted by Jill | 8:23 AM

There ain't no justice, I tell ya.

V.C. Andrews was perhaps one of the worst fiction writers who ever walked the earth. She wrote these aggressively bad mystery/family drama books that touched on most of the seedy underside of the human psyche. Her most famous book, FLOWERS IN THE ATTIC, has everything -- parental abuse, incest, you name it. And the prose is just God-awful.

Andrews died a number of years ago, but a variety of ghostwriters continues to turn out crap fiction in the Andrews style, because people just eat up that nasty stuff that turns up under the rocks of American life.

And no one objects to that. Perhaps it's because there isn't any gay sex in those books (or maybe there is; I stopped reading after about five of her books, because there's only so much giggle and howl quotient that compensates for just plain unreadable stuff.

But while the Andrews style of grand guignol continues to be cranked out, a kid in Kentucky, who engaged himself in the dying art of fiction writing, wrote a story about a zombie takeover of a high school. Now this sounds like pretty standard fare for a 1950's American International Pictures cheapie drive-in horror movie, right? Or maybe even a 1990's one, starring Sarah Michelle Gellar.

But in the post-Columbine, post-9/11 Era of Official Insanity, this kid now finds himself under arrest for making terroristic threats:

A George Rogers Clark High School junior arrested Tuesday for making terrorist threats told LEX 18 News Thursday that the "writings" that got him arrested are being taken out of context.

Winchester police say William Poole, 18, was taken into custody Tuesday morning. Investigators say they discovered materials at Poole's home that outline possible acts of violence aimed at students, teachers, and police.

Poole told LEX 18 that the whole incident is a big misunderstanding. He claims that what his grandparents found in his journal and turned into police was a short story he wrote for English class.

"My story is based on fiction," said Poole, who faces a second-degree felony terrorist threatening charge. "It's a fake story. I made it up. I've been working on one of my short stories, (and) the short story they found was about zombies. Yes, it did say a high school. It was about a high school over ran by zombies."

Even so, police say the nature of the story makes it a felony. "Anytime you make any threat or possess matter involving a school or function it's a felony in the state of Kentucky," said Winchester Police detective Steven Caudill.

Poole disputes that he was threatening anyone.

"It didn't mention nobody who lives in Clark County, didn't mention (George Rogers Clark High School), didn't mention no principal or cops, nothing,"
said Poole. "Half the people at high school know me. They know I'm not that stupid, that crazy."

On Thursday, a judge raised Poole's bond from one to five thousand dollars after prosecutors requested it, citing the seriousness of the charge.

Poole is being held at the Clark County Detention Center.


And it was his GRANDPARENTS who turned him in! Did they ask him what it was? No. Did they even confront him with it and demand an explanation? No. Did they contact a psychologist? No. Instead, they ran right to the cops. And now this kid is going to have this arrest on his record and quite probably a file at the FBI, which in the age of ChoicePoint, means he's unlikely to ever be able to get a job.

Nice work, Grandma.
Bookmark and Share

Terrorists: If they're not Muslim, they're useless to this White House
Posted by Jill | 7:10 AM

The White House is curiously silent on the case of a Chicago judge whose husband and 89-year-old mother were murdered on Monday. It sure looks like white supremacist hate groups are involved:

White supremacist Matthew Hale, 33, who was convicted in April 2004 of soliciting an undercover FBI informant to kill her, is awaiting sentencing on murder solicitation and obstruction of justice.

Prosecutors charged that Hale was angry because Lefkow ruled that he could no longer use the name World Church of the Creator for his group since another organization had a copyright on that name.

Judge Lefkow received police protection after Hale was arrested in 2003, and a spokeswoman for the U.S. Marshal's Service said at Tuesday's news conference that a special protection detail also was assigned to the judge for several weeks last year in response to an unspecified threat. The detail was removed after an investigation, the spokeswoman said.

Hale had become notorious in 1999 when a follower, Benjamin Smith, went on a deadly shooting rampage in Illinois and Indiana. Targeting minorities, Smith killed two people, including former Northwestern University basketball coach Ricky Byrdsong, and wounded nine others before killing himself as police closed in.


Only when terrorists are dark-skinned and scary-looking; only when they practice a religion different from the President's, and only when the President's cronies can make money off of it is terrorism worthy of mention, I guess.
Bookmark and Share

Attention anyone who voted for Bush because you think he's made you safe
Posted by Jill | 6:59 AM

The latest episode of Administration grandstanding about increasing American safety without actually doing anything constructive is its ban of cigarette lighters on airplanes. Now I don't have a problem with this; it seems silly that someone can bring something that can CREATE A FIRE in a high oxygen environment on a plane, though I believe you can still bring matches on board, so I'm not sure what the point is. However, it does create a problem for smokers, and those traveling with smokers, who have now had about an hour tacked onto the amount of time without a fix, which may result in some extreme nastiness occurring on planes on the part of smokers in the throes of a nicotine fit.

Still, it's not a major issue to me, except taken in the context of what remains perfectly legal: .50 caliber sniper rifles, available for purchase over the internet, that anyone, including terrorsts, can purchase. These rifles are capable of shooting armor-piercing bullets for a distance of 200 yards. This is more than enough distance for terrorists to shoot down civilian aircraft during takeoff and landing. Needless to say, gun kooks -- some of Bush's biggest supporters, and the guys with the biggest flags and the most ribbon magnets on their trucks -- are 100% opposed to any kinds of restrictions on this type of firearm, even though this is sort of like protecting your family with a nuclear warhead.
Bookmark and Share

Someone tell Ann Coulter that words have consequences
Posted by Jill | 6:53 AM

It's one thing when the foul stench that comes out of Ann Coulter's pen reaches the vile, frightened, miserable, ignorant, mutant Americans who lap it up like a fine, aged Coors Light and then belch loudly. But sometimes her words reach beyond our shores, and at a time when Bush Administration policies are inflaming hatred of the U.S. in the Middle East, we need this like we need a second navel:

Arab bashing reached a new low in Washington last week when Ann Coulter, a loudmouthed, mean-spirited, pro-Bush columnist, decided to defend the White House press pass controversy over faux-reporter James Guckert (a.k.a. Jeff Gannon) by writing in her syndicated column: “Press passes can’t be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the president.”

Thomas, whose Hearst column is distributed by King Features Syndicate, is of Lebanese descent. The former United Press International reporter has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, and has covered every president since John F. Kennedy. She was the first female president of the White House Correspondents Association.

Even her syndicators realized the gaffe. When Coulter’s column was posted on Universal Press Syndicate’s (UPS) website, someone edited out the race-based slur “that old Arab Helen Thomas,” using instead: “that dyspeptic, old Helen Thomas.”

But the “old Arab” reference still appears the column posted on Coulter’s website: www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi.

Coulter was, perhaps, taking a cue from the White House, which has slighted Thomas several times since 2003. During a televised news conference, President George W. Bush deliberately snubbed several reporters he ordinarily calls upon, including journalists from the Washington Post, Newsweek, and USA Today. But the most conspicuous recipient of the Bush freeze-out was Thomas, who has barbed and grilled every president since Kennedy and almost always gets to ask a question. Bush pointedly ignored her.

Bush then dealt Thomas a second slight. By custom, Thomas concludes White House press conferences at the president’s signal by saying, “Thank you, Mr. President.” Bush instead ended the conference with his own sign off, “Thank you for your questions,” and killed a decades-old White House custom. Lastly, she was removed from her front row seat, and delegated to a back seat in the press choir.

Is this treatment due to the fact that Thomas has been critical of the Bush administration? She has condemned the terror-fighting Patriot Act and slammed Bush’s domestic and international policies. She also called the Iraq war “a violation of international policy under any circumstance,” and said it is “immoral.”

But she has never been known to mince her words to any president.

There has been disappointingly little reaction in defense of their colleague by White House journalists.

In an article entitled “Lipstick Fascism,” James Wolcott, a Vanity Fair contributing editor, writes: “I wonder what would happen if a writer, say me, were to refer in a Vanity Fair column to ‘that old Jew Norman Podhoretz’ or, naughtier still, ‘that old Jewess Lucianne Goldberg.’



Source: The Arab News
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, March 01, 2005

Bush Administration Declares War on Americans
Posted by Jill | 7:18 PM

Last time I looked, our system of government was such that it was designed to reflect the will of the people, not impose its own will on them. The word "war" may seem overly dramatic, but what else would you call it when the Administration has to set up a "war room" to propagandize for a policy no one outside of Bush's own wealthy constituency and their wingnut ideologue compatriots wants?

White House officials are telling Republican lawmakers and allies on K Street that they must begin to overcome opposition to President Bush's proposal for changing Social Security within six weeks, GOP strategists said yesterday.

The GOP strategists stressed that the six-week goal is not a hard deadline for a political breakthrough, but they said the public's tepid view of Social Security change cannot be allowed to continue indefinitely. The directive raises the possibility that Republicans will have to reconsider whether legislation can be passed this year, as Bush wants.

Polls show widespread skepticism of Bush's proposal for creating individual Social Security investment accounts for younger workers, and Democratic lawmakers have voiced nearly uniform opposition. The Washington Post reported over the weekend that some allies of the president are focused on possible split-the-difference deals that would significantly scale back Bush's proposal, yet enable him to claim an incremental victory.

The Treasury Department yesterday announced the formation of a Social Security "war room" and the hiring of three full-time employees to help coordinate and refine the administration's message on the issue. The war room, which the administration is calling the Social Security Information Center, will track lawmakers' remarks to their local news outlets, to help the White House detect signs of Republican concern or Democratic compromise.


"...the public's tepid view of Social Security change cannot be allowed to continue indefinitely." Doesn't that scare anyone? Doesn't it seem completely counter to the spirit of representative democracy that public opinion about an issue cannot be ALLOWED to continue? What are they going to do, start arresting people en masse for thought crimes?

The center is to be headed by Mark Pfeifle, an administration veteran who has been a spokesman for the Interior Department and last summer's Republican National Convention. Working with him will be Shannon Burkhart and Jill Willis, both of whom worked on the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign. The three were hired about two weeks ago.


Interesting how this isn't about getting the FACTS out, it's about the POLITICS, and about SELLING a policy that is going to screw over every working American and put the elderly out on the street where they used to be before a Democratic president decided that Americans had a right to live in at least some semblance of dignity in their final years. If Bush REALLY wanted to fix Social Security (in something other than the veterinary connotation of the word "fix"), wouldn't he hire an economist instead of a political salesman to get the word out?
Bookmark and Share

Abortion in real life
Posted by Jill | 1:20 PM

One of the most fascinating posters at Daily Kos is "advisorjim", a self-described "former dittohead." He's been writing a series of eye-opening articles over there about how wingnuts think. Today he takes on abortion, writing about how his view changed when he actually knew someone whose life was being destroyed by an unplanned pregnancy at 15. It's must reading, no matter what side you're on. The crux of the matter:

I still want to stop abortions. I'd rather no one had them. But you do that by treating the real cause of abortion, and not abortion itself. Republicans like to say they're the party of personal responsibility, but when it comes to abortion they're only wiling to hold the woman accountable. It takes two to tango. If a pregnant woman knew strong laws existed to force the dad to provide for the mother and child financially, maybe we'd have fewer abortions. But strangely that's not a plank in the Republican Party's platform.


It's a must-read.
Bookmark and Share

Right On Cue
Posted by Jill | 7:06 AM

In the days before the 9/11 attacks, George W. Bush's approval ratings were hovering around 45%, and many people were writing off his presidency already. The 9/11/01 attacks were the best thing that could have happened to this most inept of presidents. It was big, it was dramatic, it united Americans in common cause, and it made everyone forget what a moron they'd been stuck with.

Since the start of the Iraq war, every time Bush's approval ratings have started to hover around the critical 50% mark, there's been yet another terror attack warning, with no change in Tom Ridge's silly "color alerts". But usually it does the trick. People are reminded that only Big Daddy Bush can keep them safe, and he continues to wage a disastrous war, raid the treasury, and put future generations in the hole in perpetuity while Americans are trembling in a fetal position in the corner.

These days, Bush's approval ratings range between 46 and 52 percent hardly the "mandate" he likes to boast that he has (unless he's referring to....oh, no, I'm not going to do that this time...). If you figure that there's a hard-core 30% who would support Bush even if he was revealed to be the Antichrist, was having sex with hundreds of small boys, and shot 150 children to death in a drunken rampage, these are hardly results to write home about.

The Gannonguckert story won't go away, and even major news outlets are starting to pick it up. USANext's anti-AARP tactics have hit the national news, and the two men pictured in the ad are considering filing suit for using their image without their consent. 115 people were killed by a suicide bomber in Iraq yesterday. The reverse Robin Hood scam that is Bush's Social Security plan is losing more support across the board every day. AND, it's starting to look like Democrats have a shot at taking the House of Representatives in 2006, which would mean an end to the free pass for this most corrupt Administration in my lifetime.

In short, it's not good times for C-Plus Caligula.

So, just as last time, we have the confluence of two factors that should make us all vigilant:

1) The attorney general is focused like a laser beam on pornography and prostitution.

2) Right on cue, the CIA is announcing that the deputy Osama Bin Laden (remember him? Bush doesn't) is trying to enlist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to plan attacks in the United States. As with all the other warnings we've received over the last three-plus years, these warnings are called "credible but not specific". What this means is "Don't forget that the boogeyman is still out there and he's gonna getcha unless you fall in line and worship Our Lord Jesus W. Bush."

And what's worse is that Americans are going to fall for it. Just as they always do.
Bookmark and Share
Monday, February 28, 2005

And the award for utter shamelessness in the face of irony goes to....
Posted by Jill | 9:26 PM
The Bush Administration!

Un-frickin-believable. Last time we had an Attorney General whose main focus was porn, ten guys with boxcutters (or so they say) brought down the World Trade Center. And these are the same guys who decided that a guy who sold his services as an "escort" and posted nude photos of himself all over the internet was a legitimate journalist.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Monday he would move aggressively to prosecute obscenity cases, and he laid out a broader agenda much like that of his predecessor, John Ashcroft.

In his first lengthy address since becoming attorney general in early February, Gonzales said people who distribute obscene materials do not enjoy constitutional guarantees of free speech.

"I am committed to prosecuting these crimes aggressively," he said to a Washington meeting of the California-based Hoover Institution.

The Justice Department is appealing the dismissal of an obscenity case in Pittsburgh in which a federal judge said prosecutors went too far in trying to block the sale of pornographic movies over the Internet and through the mail. The case initially was prosecuted under Ashcroft.


Meanwhile, back at the Pot 'n' Kettle Ranch:

Bush Administration To Require U.S. AIDS Groups Take Pledge Opposing Commercial Sex Work To Gain Funding

[Feb 28, 2005]

The Bush administration is requiring that U.S. HIV/AIDS organizations seeking funding to provide services in other countries make a pledge opposing commercial sex work, and some Republican lawmakers and administration officials are pushing for a similar policy for needle-exchange programs, the Wall Street Journal reports. Under the new policy, even groups whose HIV/AIDS work in other countries has "nothing to do" with commercial sex workers will have to make a written pledge opposing commercial sex work or risk losing federal funding, according to the Journal. In addition, the Bush administration might refuse to fund HIV/AIDS groups that do not accept Bush's "social agenda" on issues such as sexual abstinence and drug use, according to the Journal.


Unless, of course, said prostitutes are willing to shill for the Bush Administration's policies. Then it's OK. Because....

....all together now....

....sing it, sistah!.....

....follow the bouncing ball and sing along!


IT'S OK IF YOU'RE A REPUBLICAN!!

(Thanks to Americablog, which really ought to start charging me for redistributing the gems they find)
Bookmark and Share

Lunchtime Oscar® Recap Blogging
Posted by Jill | 1:35 PM
So I stayed up for every last gruesome, boring, stultifying, scared shitless of the FCC minute of it.

How sad is it that THIS particular monologue by Chris Rock sounded edgy? This monologue was to Chris Rock as Jell-o instant vanilla pudding is to crème brulée. How sad is it that there was NO cleavage in sight, not even after Rock's hideous joke about the four biggest Spanish-speaking stars? How sad is it that no one wore anything really, terrifyingly awful? Are they that afraid of Kathy Griffin? And how sad is it that, as Cintra Wilson so aptly puts it in today's Salon:

Now, "Million Dollar Boobies": That was NOT the best movie of the year. That was the Champ, the Jackie Coogan, 1930s, gloves, tears, sweat 'n' snot classic, rewritten for a younger female and older male, who exercise their sexless intimacy through broken noses and mercy-killing. It was a solidly good film, but for me, it was like paying $325 a night to stay in a four-star hotel -- Clint, Morgan and Hilary are pretty much the Gold Standard, and if it you can't pull the wagon with those three majestic Clydesdales of the Thespian Craft, it has no wheels. That film had tasteful wallpaper, thick towels, a rose on the bedspread, and no real funk or character. But you can cry a world of hurt while watching that has nothing to do with the film itself, and I think that's why it won: It was cathartic. We're in a lot of collective pain, we're weary and confused, and Clint hit the right release valve. Big Daddy's going to put you out of your misery now, Tiger. You just rest.


...that Kill a Cripple for Clint swept just about everything, leaving poor, ever-more-diminutive-by-the-day Marty Scorsese, sitting there with that painted-on smile YET AGAIN? OK, last time his lugubrious, ponderous, bloated Gangs of New York was justifiably beaten by Adrien Brody's fascinatingly majestic schnozz. But just because a reasonably attractive girl can do a whiz-bang-up job playing trailer trash but can't do anything else, and just because it's Clint Fucking Eastwood behind it, and just because it involves a bunch of the Required Factors for Victory (see also: Scott Renshaw's interesting scoring system at Cinemarati, and Nathaniel R's spot-on analysis of Why It Pays For Actresses To Ugly Down), doesn't make it Great Cinema.

Of course I'm in the minority on this.

Still...it was a pretty boring evening overall. It's a shame how Hollywood has been beaten into submission by stupid billboards and right-wing shills; so that they seem to actually believe now that they are responsible for the decline of western civiliation. It's amazing to watch all these people that Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity love to point fingers at shower accolades on this guy:

In the spring of 2000 Eastwood joined forces with Rep. Mark Foley (R. FL) to support the ADA Notification Act, a bill that would require disabled people to wait yet another 90 days, requiring them to ask a business, nicely, to please make their premises accessible, before suing them under the Americans with Disabilities Act for their lack of access. Since 1992, the federal law has required access. But almost no small businesses have bothered to obey the law.

Yet, according to Eastwood in his media blitz during the spring of 2000, businesses were being picked on by "unscrupulous" lawyers out to make a fast buck.

Eastwood appeared on the talk shows Hardball and Crossfire; he was covered in a Fox News Special. The National Journal quoted him. Columnists covered his comments. Newsweek used the "Mercedes" quote on its "Perspectives" page ("What happens is these lawyers, they come along and they end up driving off in a big Mercedes," Eastwood told reporters, "and the disabled person ends up driving off in a wheelchair."),


THIS is the face of "Hollywood Liberals"? Sure, Rock did that great bit comparing Bush's lack of accountability to someone who works at the Gap and declares war on Banana Republic for selling toxic tank tops that don't even exist. But once you got past that, the "Face of Hollywood Liberalism" was a puffed-up and self-important (and humorless) Sean Penn sniffing indignantly at what he perceived to be a bitchslap at Jude Law in Chris Rock's monologue, which had ME yelling at the TV, "Hey, Penn! Get over yerself already!" I haven't been so annoyed by condescension since someone reminded me that NASA stands for "National Aeronautics and Space Administration."

For me the high point of the evening wasn't even on the Oscar telecast itself, but in, of all places, Barbara Walters' interview with Jamie Foxx. Now I recognize that these people are ACTORS, and you can figure that there's a certain amount of performance in everything they do, but Fox was so articulate about what having African-Americans win these silly things means for the larger community, and so loving in the way he talked about his late kickass grandmother, that it almost made me forget I really wanted Don Cheadle to win.

After the show I went to sleep and dreamt that Clive Owen had won Best Supporting Actor. I woke up and my bed was filled (as it is every morning), with two sprawling cats.
Bookmark and Share
Sunday, February 27, 2005

Good Christian Moral Values
Posted by Jill | 2:27 PM

Los Angeles Times:

He called himself a monster, but in 31 years of hunting the serial killer known as BTK, Wichita police made it clear they were searching for a man who appeared in every way ordinary. On Saturday, they announced they finally had caught him.

Dennis Rader, 59, a church-going family man, a Cub Scout leader, a dog-catcher for the trim suburb of Park City, is in custody on suspicion of torturing and killing seven women, one man and two children from 1974 to 1991 — including two victims linked only this week to BTK.

Authorities would not discuss the specifics of their investigation into BTK. (The "code word" the killer used to describe himself described his method: bind, torture, kill). But they have compared Rader's DNA with the semen that BTK left at several crime scenes.

They said they were confident that Rader was the man who terrorized this industrial city for decades, taunting detectives with poems, word puzzles and boastful letters — including one in which he declared that there was "no help, no cure" for his sadism, "except death or being caught and put away."

"Bottom line: BTK is arrested," Wichita Police Chief Norman Williams said at a news conference Saturday morning. "Doggone it, we did it."

[snip]

Although some of his neighbors said he was friendly — and he was well-respected enough to serve as president of his church council— others called him mean and arrogant. "He wore a badge and would swagger around the street like he was above the law. I always considered him a bully," said James Reno, 42, who has lived across the street from Rader for more than a decade.

[snip]

They all have questions they'd like to ask: How did he pick his victims? Why did he claim credit for some murders and not for others? Why did he start communicating with police again after 25 years of silence?

One question that they do not need to ask is how he eluded capture for so long.

"We always said he was invisible because he was most likely so ordinary," said Smith, the retired detective. "As it turned out, he was exactly ordinary. He went to work. He went to church. He went to Boy Scouts. He did family things. Just an ordinary guy."


I, by comparison, never, ever set foot in a church. I'm not a serial killer, either. So much for church making you a more moral person.
Bookmark and Share

Six Degrees of Leonardo DiCaprio
Posted by Jill | 7:58 AM
Usually I cede the culture beat to our brother site Modern Fabulousity, but I heard this on Newsradio 88 this morning, and in the spirit of the Festival of Ridiculousness that is Oscar® weekend, I wanted to pass it on.

Out of 20 acting nods, at least seven, or 35%, are connected to fellow nominee Leonardo DiCaprio (a.k.a. The Actor Who For Some Reason Scares the Bejeezus Out of Straight Men in America):

Thread 1:

Leonardo DiCaprio worked with Kate Winslet in Titanic.

Kate Winslet worked with Jim Carrey in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Carrey worked with Morgan Freeman (nominated for Million Dollar Baby in Bruce Almighty.

Thread 2:

Leonardo DiCaprio worked with Johnny Depp (nominated for Finding Neverland) in What's Eating Gilbert Grape.

Johnny Depp's co-star in Finding Neverland is Kate Winslet.

Thread 3:

Leonardo DiCaprio worked with nominee Hilary Swank (Million Dollar Baby) in the 1980's television series Growing Pains.

I'll add a couple more:

Leonardo DiCaprio worked with Meryl Streep in Marvin's Room. Meryl Streep worked with Clint Eastwood (nominated for Million Dollar Baby) in The Bridges of Madison County.

Leonardo DiCaprio worked with Ioan Gruffudd in Titanic. Gruffudd appeared with Clive Owen (nominated for Closer) in 2004's King Arthur.

OK, now you try it. Post your findings in the comments.
Bookmark and Share