"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Friday, August 14, 2009

Friday Big Blue Smurf Blogging: What They Said: Everyone Knows that the Dice Are Loaded Edition
Posted by Jill | 10:41 PM
Today's honoree: Howie Klein, for Obama Agonistes.

Money quote:
I tried to persuade myself that I was supporting this Obama. I really wanted to believe it-- and sometimes I did/do. But when he chose the single most ruthless Machiavellian and corrupt slime on the Democratic side of the aisle as his chief of staff, I knew that not only would he be another in a long line of shitty presidents but a failed one at that. None of this should have come as a surprise to me-- or to any DWT reader. All during the campaign, while the Republican media plants insisted Obama had the #1 most liberal voting record in the Senate, I kept pointing out that it wasn't #1 or even in the top 10, nor in the top 20, nor among the top half of the Democrats. In fact, Obama's Senate voting record could at best, be called "moderate." In actuality he was at the bottom of the barrel, never even nearly as progressive a Senate voter as Hillary Clinton, let alone Dick Durbin. His was more in line with Joe Lieberman (his mentor), Blanche Lincoln, Max Baucus... that's right, all the worst members of the House of Lords preventing a progressive agenda from going forward under... President Obama.

I disagree with the implication that Hillary Clinton would be a more leftish president than Obama is. After all, she is the candidate who still insists that if she'd had the information that so many of us out here in the real world had, she wouldn't have voted for the Iraq War. She is the candidate who stood up at Yearly Kos 2007 and said "Lobbyists are Americans too." So I think the elevation of Hillary Clinton to Progressive Sainthood is as misguided as the pre-election elevation of Barack Obama to progressive sainthood was. But he is right that the minute Rahm Emanuel became Obama's Karl Rove (only Rahm isn't anywhere nearly as good at it), many of us knew that the fix was in.

And now everybody knows:


Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, July 12, 2009

Is anyone actually surprised by this?
Posted by Jill | 8:20 AM
This is supposed to be Big!! Breaking!!! News!!!!!??? My reaction to this is a Cheneyesque "So?"

Why is anyone surprised by this:
The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency’s director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.

The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy.

Mr. Panetta, who ended the program when he first learned of its existence from subordinates on June 23, briefed the two intelligence committees about it in separate closed sessions the next day.

Efforts to reach Mr. Cheney through relatives and associates were unsuccessful.

The question of how completely the C.I.A. informed Congress about sensitive programs has been hotly disputed by Democrats and Republicans since May, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the agency of failing to reveal in 2002 that it was waterboarding a terrorism suspect, a claim Mr. Panetta rejected.

The law requires the president to make sure the intelligence committees “are kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States, including any significant anticipated intelligence activity.” But the language of the statute, the amended National Security Act of 1947, leaves some leeway for judgment, saying such briefings should be done “to the extent consistent with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other exceptionally sensitive matters.”

In addition, for covert action programs, a particularly secret category in which the role of the United States is hidden, the law says that briefings can be limited to the so-called Gang of Eight, consisting of the Republican and Democratic leaders of both houses of Congress and of their intelligence committees.

The disclosure about Mr. Cheney’s role in the unidentified C.I.A. program comes a day after an inspector general’s report underscored the central role of the former vice president’s office in restricting to a small circle of officials knowledge of the National Security Agency’s program of eavesdropping without warrants, a degree of secrecy that the report concluded had hurt the effectiveness of the counterterrorism surveillance effort.

Newsweek reported yesterday in a profile of Eric Holder that the Attorney General is considering appointing a prosecutor to investigate the Bush Administration's torture activities. That doesn't have me as excited as it does some of my compatriots, because the Justice Department is still lousy with Bush appointees, and I suspect any "investigation" will end in a proclamation of "bad activities done out of goodwill for our nation" and nothing will be done.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Now we know the financial bubble is really over
Posted by Jill | 7:51 PM
I guess that when Jim Cramer called Lenny Dykstra a natural in a segment done byh Bernard Goldberg, that should have been our first clue:



Now it seems that the House of Nails was a house of cards:

The house of cards finally came down Wednesday on former New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies centre fielder Lenny Dykstra.

For those who aren't familiar, Dykstra parlayed a successful car wash chain into a career as a supposed stock-picking wizard — touted by CNBC's own embattled guru Jim Cramer — and started a much talked about magazine for pro athletes (The Players Club), before one business associate after another started noticing that Lenny wasn't actually paying for anything.

Dykstra filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Wednesday. The filing claims he has assets of no more than US$50,000 while claiming debts of between $10-million to $50-million. There are estimates that the actual figure is much closer to the latter.


I admit it: I was one of those people charmed by the Lenny Dykstra saga. You have to realize what it was like to be a 4'10" person in 1986 and watching this little fireplug of a guy play his heart out for the then-cocky, swaggering, fun-to-watch Mets. That Lenny Dykstra, who stayed married to his first wife and never struck anyone as being the sharpest knife in the drawer, should find a second career as a financial genius, had a certain Capra-esque charm that was very seductive. Many of us wanted to believe the Cinderella story of Lenny Dykstra. But like much of the events of the last eight years, it was a ll a mirage, and Dykstra instead of being a Capra hero, appears to have been more of a mini-Madoff:
Just in the past two years, Dykstra has been the subject of at least 24 legal actions, including 18 since November. Three suits hit the courts on Jan. 29. He's been sued by publishers and print companies, by three different groups of pilots and by a Maryland-based financial and litigation consulting firm that offered expert testimony on his behalf in an earlier lawsuit. He's even been sued by a die-hard Mets fan who was the best man at his wedding 20-some years ago, though that New York investor claims there is no bad blood.

One of the angry souls is Dr. Festus Dada, a Nigerian-born gastric bypass specialist, who filed a fraud/breach of contract suit and alleges Dykstra kept a $500,000 deposit after a deal fell apart to purchase a Southern California car wash and retail center then owned by Dykstra. Dada walked away from the transaction, claiming in the suit that Dykstra had made significant changes to the final escrow agreement, including the insertion of a five-year contract for Dykstra's old Phillies teammate, Pete Incaviglia, to serve as general manager under the new ownership.

"We had a closing date, but the good doctor thought there were no rules in this country," says Dykstra, pointing out that Dada himself has been a defendant in dozens of civil suits since 2000. "You'll see a laundry list [of suits], dude. OK, so much for Dr. Dada's credibility, huh?"

Dada's side of the story, not surprisingly, is different. He suggests the ex-ballplayer set out to rip him off, saying he believes Dykstra was desperate for cash and rushed to close on the $27.5 million deal within 30 days. Dada's attorneys say the property was so encumbered by liens that it was impossible to close so quickly.

"He thought he could keep my $500,000 and nobody would have the resources to go after him," Dada says. "But in this case, I am going after him. General surgeons are not intimidated by professional athletes.

[snip]

Two Players Club vice presidents filed claims for unpaid wages after they quit in January. The Minneapolis-based firm hired to design his Players Club Web site alleges Dykstra stiffed it on a $1 million contract, and then bounced two separate $125,000 checks.

In a particularly curious hunt for cash, Dykstra borrowed $250,000 from New York literary agent David Vigliano last May with an agreement to repay him $300,000 in November -- a robust 40 percent annual percentage rate. Vigliano filed suit after Dykstra didn't come up with the money.

[snip]

Even members of Dykstra's family are lined up on the list of those to whom he owes money. His older brother, Brian, has yet to collect a $12,000 judgment awarded by the California Labor Relations Board. His younger brother, Kevin, alleges Dykstra cheated him out of $4 million on the sale of the family-run car washes, though Kevin hasn't filed suit.

On April 16, Terri, Dykstra's wife of more than 20 years and the mother of their three boys, filed for divorce. Through her attorney, she declined to comment for this story.

The family rift runs so deep that until recently, Dykstra had spoken to his mother only once in the past three years, according to his brothers, and wasn't allowing her any contact with his sons, her grand children.

Last month, though, on March 23, Dykstra picked up the phone and woke up his mother with a call at around 6 in the morning, according to Kevin Dykstra, his younger brother. Lenny was stranded in Cleveland. He wanted to charter a jet so he could get to a business meeting on the West Coast, and his credit cards were maxed out. He needed nearly $23,000 and asked his mother for it, Kevin says.

His mother agreed to let him use her credit card.

Kevin Dykstra says she has yet to be repaid.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, April 21, 2009

And it isn't going to stop, either
Posted by Jill | 5:20 AM
It's almost a conspiracy theorist's dream scenario, =ahem =, OK, an independent speculative investigator's dream scenario. Here's a centrist president whose very existence so freaks out the right that they start amassing guns 'n' ammo at a furious rate; a former Constitutional law professor whose campaign was built on hope and change and accountability, and within his first 100 days, makes very clear that where his predecessor's war crimes are concerned, it's "Ah, that's in the past now, let's just look ahead."

This is such a specious argument it's laughable. There's the old Yiddish joke about the definition of chutzpah being the man who kills his parents and then pleads for mercy because he's an orphan. The idea that crimes are not prosecutable because they have already happened is preposterous, particularly for someone who claims to have as one of his administration's goals to bring in Osama Bin Laden. Weren't "I really am not that concerned about him" the words of Barack Obama's predecessor? We expected lack of accountability to be an integral part of the Bush Administration, but we never dreamed that Obama, even if we knew he wasn't the progressive dreamboat most of the netroots thought he was, would sign onto the "move on, nothing to see here" doctrine.

So what does YOUR spidey-sense tell you? A deal made where Bush wouldn't declare a state of emergency so as to avoid handing over power in return for this sort of executive immunity? Some kind of Ivy League torture cabal? Remembrance of John F. Kennedy and how there have always been rumblings of the CIA being involved in his assassination? The potential for investigations to demonstrate that many high-profile Democrats in Congress knew and approved of torture as well? Or is it a matter of Barack Obama being corrupted by Washington this quickly?

Well, he may not have a choice as to whether to investigate, because except for the most sick, rabid wingnuts, most people are horrified that even a monster like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was waterboarded 183 times:
Pressure mounted on President Obama on Monday for more thorough investigation into harsh interrogations of terrorism suspects under the Bush administration, even as he tried to reassure the Central Intelligence Agency that it would not be blamed for following legal advice.

Mr. Obama said it was time to admit “mistakes” and “move forward.” But there were signs that he might not be able to avoid a protracted inquiry into the use of interrogation techniques that the president’s top aides and many critics say crossed the line into torture.

And while Mr. Obama vowed not to prosecute C.I.A. officers for acting on legal advice, on Monday aides did not rule out legal sanctions for the Bush lawyers who developed the legal basis for the use of the techniques.

The president’s decision last week to release secret memorandums detailing the harsh tactics employed by the C.I.A. under his predecessor provoked a furor that continued to grow on Monday as critics on various fronts assailed his position. Among other things, the memos revealed that two captured Qaeda operatives were subjected to a form of near-drowning known as waterboarding a total of 266 times.

Some Bush administration officials, including former Vice President Dick Cheney, accused the administration of endangering the country by disclosing national secrets. Mr. Cheney went on the Fox News Channel to announce that he had asked the C.I.A. to declassify reports documenting the intelligence gained from the interrogations. Gen. Michael V. Hayden, the former C.I.A. director, has also condemned the release of the memorandums and said the harsh questioning had value.

On the other side of the spectrum, human rights activists, Congressional Democrats and international officials pressed for a fuller accounting of what happened. Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat and chairwoman of the Intelligence Committee, wrote Mr. Obama asking him not to rule out prosecutions until her panel completed an investigation over the next six to eight months.

Mr. Obama tried to calm the situation with his first visit to C.I.A. headquarters since taking office. Concerned about alienating the agency, Mr. Obama went out of his way to lavish praise on intelligence officers, using words like “indispensable,” “courage” and “remarkable” and promising his “support and appreciation.”

“Don’t be discouraged by what’s happened in the last few weeks,” he told employees. “Don’t be discouraged that we have to acknowledge potentially we’ve made some mistakes. That’s how we learn. But the fact that we are willing to acknowledge them and then move forward, that is precisely why I am proud to be president of the United States and that’s why you should be proud to be members of the C.I.A.”


I don't know what's more disheartening, that an erudite guy like Barack Obama can come up with no better term for willful and gleeful torture as a policy than resorting to the Kissingerian passive voice of "mistakes were made"; or that there's some kind of "It's OK if you're an American" exception to Nuremberg Principle IV ("The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him."). It's either intellectual laziness or the height of cynicism. Either way, if he thinks that giving the Bush Administration a free pass for its crimes is a way to ingratiate himself with the right, last week's hysteria and the fact that the eliminationist militia movement has awakened from its eight-year-long slumber already disproves that notion.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, March 27, 2009

Any day now.....ANNNNY day....
Posted by Jill | 6:13 AM
Remember that ad for some online mortgage company that promised quick turnaround and contrasted itself with banks by showing a mortgage officer at a brick and mortar bank sitting at his desk saying "Your loan approval should be here day day now....[pause]....any day....."? It's kind of an unfortunate analogy these days, but that ad was what I thought of yesterday when I saw the "dramatic" unveiling of the Republicans' "alternate budget" (which apparently exists only in an "alternate universe"). Are they freakin' kidding?



This is the Great Republican Budget Plan (via John Cole and the Great Orange Satan):



On the other hand, what else would you expect from a political party whose base thinks scientific method consists of throwing up your hands and saying "I don't understand it....it must be MAGIC!"

MSNBC's Contesse Brewer was simply flabbergasted by what she saw, and it was left to her blond newsbot cohort to valiantly carry the GOP water all by herself by dismissing Brewer's expectation that we actually see NUMBERS coming out of the GOP's alternate universe -- I mean PLAN:




Later on, Robert Gibbs seemed to be having the time of his life over in the White House Press Room, seemingly amazed that the Republicans had just lobbed him a big fat hanging curve ball, waist-high, right down the center of the plate. Watch his face as he knocks it out of the park; it's priceless:




I would disagree that the budget indicates that the Republicans are the party of no new ideas. They are the party of no ideas, period.

But over in the alternate universe outside of consensus reality in which conservatives live, this was a firm, forceful parry of the President's challenge. In a post rife with male performance anxiety in the face of the Big Black Man, sniveling little rat-faced git Jeff Emanuel congratulates the Republican Clown Car for the very same ridiculous performance that the rest of us saw.

And now a parenthetical, just to put some rich gooey frosting on the cake: John Cole has some of the snarkiest commenters in the universe. Some choice quotes:

"Between these twits and Bush, how did they manage to avoid accidentally sending the Earth into a collision course with the Sun over the last 8 years?"

"I’m becoming convinced that Obama is Lord Vetinari from Terry Pratchett’s Discworld books. We’ll know for sure if he starts sending mimes and other street artists to the scorpion pits that Dick Cheney had installed under the White House."

"Not only am I making popcorn, but I’m putting truffle oil on it."

"This is so many layers of awesome covered in awesome sauce I can’t even begin to comprehend it."

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, September 13, 2008

Because Osama Bin Laden has been of more use to George W. Bush alive than dead
Posted by Jill | 9:22 AM
Would the Bush Administration have been able to get away with systematically eviscerating the Constitution and the Bill of Rights if Osama Bin Laden had been captured before now? Hardly. So now we know: Just as with everything else this Administration has done, its handling of Bin Laden has never been about justice or about national security. It's been about politics all along. And now that George W. Bush needs SOMETHING....ANYTHING to try to mitigate his legacy as the most destructive, horrific president this country has known in its entire history -- NOW he's decided it's time to get Bin Laden:
NPR has learned that the raid by helicopter-borne U.S. Special Operations forces in Pakistan last week was not an isolated incident but part of a three-phase plan, approved by President Bush, to strike at Osama bin Laden and top al-Qaida leadership.

The plan calls for a much more aggressive military campaign, said one source, familiar with the presidential order, which gives the green light for the military to take part in the operations. The plan represents an 11th-hour effort to hammer al-Qaida until the Bush administration leaves office, two government officials told NPR.

"Definitely, the gloves have come off," said a source who has been briefed on the plan. "This was only Phase 1 of three phases."

Pentagon and White House officials have declined to discuss the new plan.

The intelligence community already had approval from the president to carry out operations inside Pakistan, which included attacks by Predator drones, which can carry 100-pound Hellfire missiles.

Additional authority came from the president just recently that allowed incursions by U.S. Special Operations forces, the source said.

[snip]

Both sources say those in the intelligence community and on Capitol Hill are raising questions about the political intent of this new aggressive stance.

"The question is," said one of the sources, "Why wasn't this done a year ago?"


For that matter, why not seven? Of course we know the answer. It's because a frightened population was a necessary condition for the Administration to eliminate our right to be left alone by our government and for it to stay in power for two terms.

Because for the Republicans, and this includes John McCain, it's never, ever "Country First." It's politics first. It's victory first. Country comes in at around #1,485.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, September 10, 2008

If she's tough enough to be president, why treat her like a fragile flower?
Posted by Jill | 4:36 PM
Ah, the big strong military hero protecting the flower of white wimminhood against the Evil Black Man:




Wait a minute...haven't the Republicans used this kind of wolf imagery and footage before, in a different context?




I didn't even have to read the whole post at TPM, where the new ad was posted, to remember the wolf imagery used to represent Islamic terrorists in 2004. Nice dogwhistling, Mr. Rove. You get to evoke the earlier ad and reinforce the notion of Barack Obama as a Muslim Terrorist AND a Big Black Buck out to Debase Our White Women.

If the McCain campaign wants to use wolf imagery, why not just cut to the chase and run this as an ad:



I'm not sure how you fight this kind of thing, these lies and innuendo that play to people's most base fears; the things that keep them up at night, the notions they don't dare talk about. It's long past time for Obama to take the gloves off, but with the McCain campaign tapping the reptilian brain like this, I'm not sure what would work.

It's pretty much all up to the press at this point, and since the press has latched onto the "lipstick on a pig" thing and taken the McCain line that it's a slur against Palin, I guess we're pretty much screwed seven ways to Sunday.

Enjoy your new Christian Dominionist overlords, and enjoy yourself when they get the Battle of Armageddon they so desperately want.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, August 04, 2008

So the fearmongering and racism is working. Does that surprise anyone?
Posted by Jill | 1:08 PM
Joe Sudbay notes that Rasmussen now has Obama and McCain in a statistical tie. This should surprise no one. I've been saying since this election season really got into gear that the next president would be the Republican.

Despite the large number of Democratic candidates in the beginning, I always knew that this nomination was going to come down to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John Edwards. And I always figured none of them could possibly win.

With Edwards the biggest problem was the recurrence of his wife's illness, but the media's willingness to ignore everything the man said and talk for weeks about his haircut and his house, showed me that he couldn't win. And you can bet that if he were the nominee right now, the nothing-but-hearsay Story We Will Not Repeat would be the nonstop topic on MSNBC.

Hillary Clinton certainly had the ability to fight back, but he came with steamer trunkloads of baggage and a an attention-hogging husband who was going to be a problem no matter what. And let's face it -- this country still doesn't like women who fight back and who stand up for themselves. Look at the adulation given Cindy McCain, whose job is to be a pretty, smiling cipher out on the campaign trail, and the attention given to Michelle Obama for daring to speak her mind. Hillary Clinton might have gone after the McCain smears with both barrels, but then we would have heard nonstop about what a castrating bitch she is and how much white working class males, who we all know are the only voters who matter in Media-Land, are threatened by her.

That left Barack Obama. The reason I didn't support Obama at the start was because of this annoying habit he has of believing that you can somehow do business with Republicans; that you can somehow reach across the aisle without pulling back something other than a bloody, gnawed stump. These people play for keeps, and with the exception of Bill Clinton, whom they hated because he was capable of getting just as down and dirty as they did, every Democratic nominee since I've been old enough to vote has made the same mistake of believing that Americans vote with something other than their worst impulses.

And their worst impulses are getting a good workout with Barack Obama.

I keep talking about this friend of mine who has decided to believe all the smear e-mails. I talk about her because she is not a Rush Limbaugh conservative. She is a centrist who insists she votes for the person, not for the party. She hates George W. Bush, she hates what he's done to this country. She dislikes John McCain, too. This is a woman who has a one-year-old granddaughter that she loves more than life itself. If she had to gouge out her own eye with a meat fork so that this baby could see, she would do it in a heartbeat. And yet she is not going to vote for Barack Obama, because she fears that he's "not loyal enough to this country." Why does she believe this? Because of e-mails she's received; e-mails that reach into that dark, scared, childish place in all of us and tap into our fears. John McCain may be awful, but at least he's not "a ni--" as Mel Brooks said in Blazing Saddles, a movie that is almost no longer funny because it's so spot-on. And he doesn't have a funny name that sounds like an Arab terrorist and his wife is a little lady, not someone with brass balls and her own opinions.

John McCain may be awful, but at least with him we know what we're going to get -- more screwing over of the middle class, more oil wars, more fear, more evisceration of our Constitution. In other words, more of the same. And at least he's not "a ni--".

Barack Obama, like Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, and John Kerry before him, wants to believe that "The American people are too smart to believe this." That kind of hope and optimism may be laudable, but it doesn't win elections. Because the truth is no, the american people are NOT too smart to believe it -- not when Republicans are right there with their sharp metal probe poking at the reptilian brain 24 x 7 on cable news.

And so here we are, with a Republican party in disgrace, led by as appalling a man as has ever held the office of the presidency. That party has put up a senile old man with anger management problems and a need to win a war at all costs to get over his Vietnam demons. And he's going to win. Because the Democrats Just. Don't. Get. It. They don't get that the media is not their friend. They don't get that Americans respond to fear every time. They don't get that if they would just STAND for something, they might do better.

Either that or Mr. Brilliant is right and it's all a scam and they're all on the same team...and the Democrats are only there to make you think you have a choice.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, July 10, 2008

Of course they do, because for them, anyone to the left of Mussolini is a liberal
Posted by Jill | 6:40 AM
Hey, Senator Obama....if you thought that voting to give George W. Bush unfettered power to spy on Americans for any reason at any time and to give the telecom companies immunity would somehow inoculate you from charges of being some sort of raging Commie, guess again:

Republicans see a different Obama. The National Journal rated him the most liberal member of the Senate last year. His advisers say the rating system is faulty, but McCain and other Republicans say it is an accurate reflection of Obama's political philosophy.

Peter Wehner, a former Bush administration official who is now at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, considers Obama someone who can move his party to new places on race and religion. But on policy, he sees him as conventionally liberal. "The Democratic Party today is quite liberal, and Obama, if anything, will deepen the roots of its liberalism," he said.


One would think you'd have learned, after the last decade and a half, that it doesn't matter how much a Democrat moves to the right -- Republicans will still tar you as some kind of raging socialist Threat to the Very Survival of the Republic™.

Clearly you haven't learned that yet. I wonder what it's going to take to get through to you.

Or maybe it IS clear, and you're part of a rigged system that just puts out Democrats to be sacrificial lambs to fool us into thinking that the government represents us, when it doesn't at all.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Not with a bang but with a whimper
Posted by Jill | 9:57 PM

And so it ends, this Great Experiment of ours, this free nation forged by a bunch of hemp-smokers and womanizers who dared say no to a king and founded a nation that not so long ago was not just the most powerful nation on earth, but one admired and emulated by the rest of the world.

No more.

No longer does the rule of law take precedence over the insanity of a despotic leader. No longer does the document in which the laws that make this country what it was mean anything. It's all about perception, and not the perception of the voters, but perception of the media talking heads with their marching orders by their corporate masters to ensure that only those who would consolidate as much wealth as possible into the hands of the few, who would yoke the unwashed, impoverished masses unto themselves in a state of permanent indentured servitude, grateful for the scraps fed to them like dogs after the CEOs and board chairmen get done stuffing themselves to stupefaction, make it to the finish line.

It didn't all die today, of course. This country has been an aspirated corpse on a ventilator, a Terri Schiavo of nations, if you will, ever since the USA PATRIOT Act was passed by a House and Senate full of cowards who were too lazy to explain to the American people that turning this country into East Germany circa 1965 is not the way we defend freedom against attack.

And Barack Obama -- our party's nominee, the guy who told a generation of young people too young to remember how they killed our prophets while we stand aside and look, the guy who for a few brief moments made us think that perhaps -- just perhaps -- he might be even one iota different, succumbed to the siren song of unfettered power and said "Want. Srsly." -- as he pushed the "Yes" button when voting today.

A president completely discredited by three-quarters of the American people still has the power to cow 535 representatives into submission simply by threatening them. Whether it's threatening them with exposure of misdeeds, or threatening them with terrorist attacks for which he will hold them responsible (when he knows exactly when and where they will take place because he will allow them to happen, just as he did last time because he wanted the war and he wanted the power and he wanted Americans to be willing to give up their freedom so he could try to fill the empty hole in his soul with more money and more power), or whether it's all a sham and they're all on the same team -- the result is the same.

The rule of law only applies to us -- the citizens of what used to be the United States. And the government will be watching us for any transgression, no matter how slight. One out of every six Americans serving prison time today are in for nonviolent marijuana offenses. In some states, a felony conviction means your right to vote is rescinded forever. A president was impeached for lying about a blowjob in a civil case that had no right even being heard at that time. But today, thanks to Nancy Pelosi, who upon becoming Speaker of the House in 2007, declared herself to be George W. Bush's protector against impeachment, and Harry Reid, with his sternly worded statements with no teeth, and a bunch of venal, greedy cowards who inhabit the People's House, our elected officials, the people who long ago forgot that THEY work for US -- are no longer bound by the rule of law.

The flag for which generations of American boys have died was spat on today in the Senate -- defiled beyond recognition in a conflagration that dwarfs any protest by an irate citizen. Some of the same Senators who felt it so important to protect the flag that they would have voted for a Constitutional amendment to protect it, no longer think the Constitution is even relevant. They would protect the flag against one person trying to make a statement, but they won't protect it against an insane president and sixty-nine corrupt, craven Senators who have zero understanding of what the flag really means. It's not a cheap Chinese-made trinket to put on your lapel at election time in a display of faux-patriotism. It's not something to grandstand about when it's politically expedient. That flag stands for the document that the Senate defecated on today. The flag stands for the Great Experiment which has now irrevocably failed. Or at least it used to.

And the damnedest thing is that those sixty-nine Senators didn't even have the balls to set the damn thing aflame.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, May 04, 2008

Thirty Eight Years Ago Today
Posted by Jill | 11:19 AM


Kent State, May 4, 1970.



Thirty-eight years ago today, four students at Kent State University were gunned down by National Guard troops during antiwar protests held a week after President Richard Nixon announced plans to begin bombing Cambodia.

Only two of those killed actually participated in the protest.

Today, much of the National Guard is deployed in Iraq, and many of those fighting George W. Bush's war oppose it as much as many of us stateside do, so it's difficult to imagine a similar response by the U.S. military to a protest against the Iraq occupation. However, George W. Bush has assembled his own Praetorian Guard in the form of Blackwater, which seems to be subject to absolutely no authority under the law. Meanwhile, Rush Limbaugh's dream is for Kent State and Chicago 1968 to become a reality for today's young people as he vocalizes his "dream" of having riots take place at this summer's Democratic National Convention.

From the 1968 election through that in 1972, we were subject to cries of "America: Love it or Leave It" by conservatives who refused to believe that anything an American government could do could possibly wrong. Many of those conservatives, and also people like John McCain, believe to this day that we could have "won" the War in Vietnam just as they believe now that we can somehow "win" the "war" in Iraq.

Nothing ever changes.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Friday, April 11, 2008

Is Condoleeza Rice to be John McCain's Dick Cheney?
Posted by Jill | 6:09 AM
The rumors that Condoleeza Rice is lobbying hard to be John McCain's running mate have been flying fast and furiously in the past few days, her denials notwithstanding. Rice would be a compelling choice; after all, the Democrats are now limited to either a black person OR a woman, whereas Rice would raise the ante for the Republicans to both. And for some strange reason known only to that fetid morass that is the conservative brain, Republicans adore her. I suspect it has more to do with Republican male fantasies about Condi in her dominatrix attire than about her competence. After all, we're talking about THIS woman:




And this one:


On June 21, the US Central Command, which controls American military forces in the Persian Gulf, went to "delta" alert - its highest level - for American troops in six countries in the region. The American embassy in Yemen was closed for part of the summer; other embassies in the Middle East closed for shorter periods.

But what had Rice done at the NSC? If the NSC files were complete, the commission's historian Warren Bass and the others could see, she had asked Clarke to conduct inter- agency meetings at the White House with domestic agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration and the FBI, to keep them alert to the possibility of a domestic terrorist strike.

She had not attended the meetings herself. She had asked that the then attorney-general, John Ashcroft, receive a special briefing at the Justice Department about al-Qaeda threats. But she did not talk with Ashcroft herself in any sort of detail about the intelligence. Nor did she have any conversations of significance on the issue with the FBI director, Louis Freeh, nor with his temporary successor that summer, the acting director Tom Pickard.

There is no record to show that Rice made any special effort to discuss terrorist threats with Bush. The record suggested, instead, that it was not a matter of special interest to either of them that summer.


Maybe she's an expert on a country that no longer exists (the Soviet Union), but she's dumb as a box of rocks in terms of her ability to add two and two and get four when it comes to terrorism.

Now it turns out that those fuck-me boots may not just be about Republican male fantasies after all -- the woman really is a masty piece of work:

In dozens of top-secret talks and meetings in the White House, the most senior Bush administration officials discussed and approved specific details of how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the Central Intelligence Agency, sources tell ABC News.

The so-called Principals who participated in the meetings also approved the use of "combined" interrogation techniques -- using different techniques during interrogations, instead of using one method at a time -- on terrorist suspects who proved difficult to break, sources said.

Highly placed sources said a handful of top advisers signed off on how the CIA would interrogate top al Qaeda suspects -- whether they would be slapped, pushed, deprived of sleep or subjected to simulated drowning, called waterboarding.

The high-level discussions about these "enhanced interrogation techniques" were so detailed, these sources said, some of the interrogation sessions were almost choreographed -- down to the number of times CIA agents could use a specific tactic.

The advisers were members of the National Security Council's Principals Committee, a select group of senior officials who met frequently to advise President Bush on issues of national security policy.

At the time, the Principals Committee included Vice President Cheney, former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell, as well as CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft.

As the national security adviser, Rice chaired the meetings, which took place in the White House Situation Room and were typically attended by most of the principals or their deputies.


Can you imagine a more cynical move than a guy who spent five years being tortured in a Hanoi prison choosing a strong advocate of torture as his running mate as a means of upping the "groundbreaking" ante?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share