"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, August 16, 2008

How the Republicans plan to steal another election
Posted by Jill | 8:51 AM
It's worked for them before, so why not steal another election through mass disenfranchisement of youthful and minority voters?

Nearly 600,000 eligible Ohio voters may be dropped from the voter rolls if Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner doesn't act to protect these voters, according to findings based on publicly available information discovered by Advancement Project and Project Vote.

These voters -- disproportionately voters of color and young voters -- are subject to being removed from Ohio's voter registration rolls without notice or a hearing because of the state's vague regulations on vote caging, a process that enables representatives of one political party to challenge the voter registration credentials of voters at polling places on Election Day.

The Ohio counties with largest numbers of returned notices prior to March 2008 Presidential Primary are Cuyahoga, Franklin, Hamilton, Lucas and Summit, where Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Toledo are located.


This is why Barack Obama needs a double-digit lead in the national polls before Election Day. The only way he wins is via a lead that is too big for the Republicans to steal the election credibly.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

More proof that for conservatives, life begins at conception and ends at birth
Posted by Jill | 8:44 AM
...unless you're born into a wealthy, white, Republican family. Because this is the sort of thing we are doing to those who aren't:

In the first seven months of this year, the United States has deported 90,000 children to Mexico - without a parent or guardian.  (Link goes to a Spanish-language news site.)

Frankly, it is a disgrace that this country has become so overtaken by xenophobic hysteria with regard to human migration that the health, safety and well-being of children is disregarded and they are abandoned to the fates on the streets of frequently violent and crime-ridden border towns.    

According to the report linked, 13,500 of those children, or 15%, find themselves in limbo at the border. With no family and no way to take care of themselves, the lucky ones are taken in by social service and religious organizations, but the unlucky ones are simply abandoned to the streets to beg for their existence, or to fall prey to human traffickers. Many are sexually exploited.
In addition to the unbelievable inhumanity of treating children as de facto felons, the practice of deporting these children is having a huge impact on Mexican states with high migration rates that are ill-equipped to deal with this massive influx of untended children dumped by the United States government.



More from Blue Girl, here.

This is the net result of dehumanizing immigrants. This is what happens when you et the hatemongers take over. You get a society that thinks of these children as vermin instead of children...and that cares not one whit what happens to them, even as politicians in Washington continues to give lip service to the well-being of children.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Saturday Big Blue Smurf Bloggin: What They Said
Posted by Jill | 7:50 AM
I really wish that someone would teach some basic geography to television's pundits.

Today's honoree: Skippy, who systematically and symbolically eviscerates The Idiocy of Peggy Noonan with a finely-honed verbal knife.

Money quote:

she made up a thing, and she does not like it? what is this, a dr. seuss poem?
i do not like a placeness lack
of maverick john or slick barack
i wish this campaign would go back
to rizzlety-diggle dork race quota tack!

because as little peggy noo drones on and on, it becomes clear that what she really misses is not placenss itself, but the time when the all the little raceness knew all their little placeness:
i miss the old geographical vividness. but we are national now, and in a world so global that at the olympics, when someone wins, wherever he is from, whatever nation or culture, he makes the same movements with his arms and face to mark his victory. south korea's park tae-hwan moves just like michael phelps, with the "yes!" and the arms shooting upward and the fists. this must be good. why does it feel like a leveling? like a squashing and squeezing down of the particular, local and authentic.

how dare those koreans act just like a white person! how dare barack be as articulate as john! how dare those uppity coloreds presume to mix w/our people, trying to run things like corporations and cities and states and (shudder) countries!


I'm serious. Why am I about to be out of work while people like Peggy Noonan are actually paid six-figure salaries to proufly display their stupidity?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, August 15, 2008

The Next Food Network Star
Posted by Jill | 8:54 AM
Coming this fall:





I know I'd watch it.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

But are the people who need to be reached going to read it?
Posted by Jill | 8:30 AM
There's no denying that the netroots and blogs have had an effect on the political system in this country. Hillary Clinton knows that better than anyone. But I think we overestimate the power of the Web at our peril, because most Americans still get their news from newspapers, magazines, and television news, not from Web sites or bloggers.

It's admirable and commendable that Truth Fights Back exists, but how many people who receive copies of Jerome Corsi's book from their wingnut friends, or hear about it at the hair salon, or get e-mail excerpts from those same wingnut friends, are going to bother to find out if the claims are true?

"It's got footnotes!", their friend will say. "I read it in a book...that was written...by a guy who writes books." (h/t)

Well, as Eric Burns noted last night on Countdown, most of who Corsi cites is, well, Corsi:





But do you think that's going to matter one bit to people who are looking for any reason to NOT vote for Obama so that they don't have to admit it's about "Can't you see that that man is a ni--"?

It's all well and good for the Obama campaign to issue a 40-page rebuttal, but do you honestly think that people whose brains are so simple that they think Obama isn't a patriot because he used to not wear a cheap Chinese-made flag pin are going to plow through 40 pages of "Oh no he di'int!"?

I don't know what the answer is. I don't know how you fight back when there appears to be a loose conspiracy among the media companies in this country to do whatever is necessary to damage Barack Obama while givng John McCain a free pass. But to think that posting a 40-page rebuttal on a web site is going to somehow counteract the combined muscle of Viacom, General Electric, Disney, Time-Warner, and News Corporation is hopelessly naïve.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Enough, or "Where IS Vicki Iseman, Anyway?"
Posted by Jill | 7:15 AM
Enough.

Let it go.

What is this accomplishing?

Today the New York Times continues to hammer the Edwards affair as if it were vital to the future of this nation.

"But what if?", you might say. "What if he had gotten the nomination?"

If he'd been the nominee, we'd be utterly screwed right now. But he isn't, and to the extent that we are screwed at all because of this, it's because of the double standard in the media in handling Democrats' peccadillos as opposed to those of Republicans.

At this point, I have no concern about the feelings of John Edwards. As someone who supported him in his quest for the nomination, and sent money for that effort, I'm angry at the idea that a dime of my money was spent to pay off Rielle Hunter to keep quiet. I'm baffled at how on earth he thought he could get away with it. And I'm appalled and disgusted at him, not just for cheating on a wife who is smart, attractive, loyal, and may very well have put her own life in danger conceiving two children after they lost their son; but also for choosing such an obvious ditz. It's one thing if your husband has the opportunity to nail Angelina Jolie. That would hurt, but at least you could understand it. But to fall for an aging party girl because she tells you that you have an old soul and that you may be the second coming of Gandhi? Sorry, but that's right up there with "You're beautiful, have you ever done any modeling?"

So now that's out of the way.

But I fail to understand how the very same media that has been kind to Elizabeth Edwards up until this point because of her illness has decided that they need to continue to put this story on the front page in perpetuity. John Edwards is not the nominee, he is not going to even attend the convention, his career in public life is over. Do we need to punish his wife further to feed the insatiable maw of right-wing talk radio? And where IS Vicki Iseman, anyway?

I'm having a hard enough time wrapping my mind around the fact that the ferociously intelligent, passionate, brave, kind woman who stood on the landing of the steps in my house in the summer of 2007 and talked about universal health care has been reduced to staying with this man because it's the best way to ensure as much time with her children as possible in the time she has left.

Let it go already. I don't need to know any more. And neither does anyone else.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, August 14, 2008

Gertrude, would you please file this away under "Why Am I Not Surprised?"
Posted by Jill | 7:07 PM
But of course what difference does it make, the man is dead so we can say anything we want about him...even if the actual evidence is making it less likely that he was the anthrax terrorist -- and even if he was, certainly less likely that he acted alone:

Federal investigators probing the deadly 2001 anthrax attacks recovered samples of human hair from a mailbox in Princeton, N.J., but the strands did not match the lead suspect in the case, according to sources briefed on the probe.

FBI agents and U.S. Postal Service inspectors analyzed the data in an effort to place Fort Detrick, Md., scientist Bruce E. Ivins at the mailbox from which bacteria-laden letters were sent to Senate offices and media organizations, the sources said.

The hair sample is one of many pieces of evidence over which researchers continue to puzzle in the case, which ended after Ivins committed suicide July 29 as prosecutors prepared to seek his indictment.

Authorities released sworn statements and search warrants last week at a news conference in which they asserted that Ivins was their sole suspect. But the materials have not dampened speculation about the merits of the investigative findings and the government's aggressive pursuit of Ivins, a 62-year-old anthrax vaccine researcher. Conspiracy theories have flourished since the 2001 attacks, which killed five people and sickened 17 others.

[snip]

Friends and former colleagues of Ivins, who died before he could see the full array of evidence prosecutors had gathered, continue to demand information about the DNA advances that authorities say led them to a flask in Ivins's lab.

Defense lawyer Paul F. Kemp yesterday said he wonders "where Ivins could have possibly stored this anthrax without any employees seeing it, or if he took it home, why there was no trace" of the deadly spores, despite repeated FBI searches over the past two years of Ivins's car, his work locker, a safe-deposit box and his house.

Meanwhile, government sources offered more detail about Ivins's movements on a critical day in the case: when letters were dropped into the postal box on Princeton's Nassau Street, across the street from the university campus.

Investigators now believe that Ivins waited until evening to make the drive to Princeton on Sept. 17, 2001. He showed up at work that day and stayed briefly, then took several hours of administrative leave from the lab, according to partial work logs. Based on information from receipts and interviews, authorities say Ivins filled up his car's gas tank, attended a meeting outside of the office in the late afternoon, and returned to the lab for a few minutes that evening before moving off the radar screen and presumably driving overnight to Princeton. The letters were postmarked Sept. 18.

Nearly seven years after the incidents, however, investigators have come up dry in their efforts to find direct evidence to place Ivins at the Nassau Street mailbox in September and October 2001.


But since Ivins isn't around to defend himself, why not tie this case up in a neat bow and put it away? After all, isn't Barack Obama a secret Muslim terrorist? And I read in a supermarket tabloid that Batboy is John Edwards' love child.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wingnut humor
Posted by Jill | 7:00 PM
I'm sure that the Unitarians in Knoxville, Tennessee find this line of T-shirts just hysterical. I'm not going to dignify them by reprinting the photo, but I found it at Group News Blog, so go add to their page views if you want to see what wingnuts think is funny instead of going to the site that sells them.

Oh, those conservatives. They're just hysterical, aren't they? After all, advocating the systematic murder of people who don't agree with you is just so quintessentially American, isn't it?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Nice work, Joe, but then, you helped create this environment
Posted by Jill | 11:39 AM
Joe Klein, who had as much to do with the obsession with the Clenis™ as anyone, has finally realized what he hath wrought -- now that it's too late and no one will go along with him:

Back in the day, John McCain was the sort of politician who would stand first in line to call out this sort of swill. (As, I'm sure Barack Obama or John Kerry would do, if some hate-crazed, money-grubbing left-winger published a book claiming that McCain had been successfully brainwashed in Vietnam--as Kerry did indeed do when a group of spurious Bush-backing Vietnam vets tried to claim exactly that about McCain during the 2000 Republican primary in South Carolina.)

But we're not seeing those sorts of claims being made about McCain this year...because Democrats tend not to do that sort of thing. They are the sorts of claims that Republicans--Bush Republicans--make. They range from the blatantly extra-curricular, like Corsi's book, to the official McCain-sanctioned introduction made by Joe Lieberman--of all people--yesterday: that Obama doesn't "put America first."

I know that people like me are supposed to try to be fair...and balanced. (The Fox mockery of our sappy professional standards seems more brutally appropriate with each passing year.) In the past, I would achieve a semblance--or an illusion--of balance by criticizing Democrats for not responding effectively when right-wing sludge merchants poisoned our national elections with their filth and lies. And it is true, as John Kerry knows, that a more effective response--and a bolder campaign--might have neutralized the Swiftboat assault four years ago. It is also true that Corsi's book this time is far less effective than his Swiftboat venture, since it doesn't come equipped with veterans willing to defile their service by telling lies to camera.

But there is no excuse for what the McCain campaign is doing on the "putting America first" front. There is no way to balance it, or explain it other than as evidence of a severe character defect on the part of the candidate who allows it to be used. There is a straight up argument to be had in this election: Mcain has a vastly different view from Obama about foreign policy, taxation, health care, government action...you name it. He has lots of experience; it is always shocking to remember that this time four years ago, Barack Obama was still in the Illinois State Legislature. Apparently, though, McCain isn't confident that conservative policies and personal experience can win, given the ruinous state of the nation after eight years of Bush. So he has made a fateful decision: he has personally impugned Obama's patriotism and allows his surrogates to continue to do that. By doing so, he has allied himself with those who smeared him, his wife, his daughter Bridget, in 2000. Those tactics won George Bush a primary--and a nomination. But they proved a form of slow-acting spiritual poison, rotting the core of the Bush presidency. We'll see if the public decides to acquiesce in sleaze in 2008, and what sort of presidency--what sort of country--that will produce.


We already know, because we've had it for the last eight years. Now if the Obama campaign had a freaking clue and wasn't determined to travel merrily down the John Kerry Let's Be Nice Road, we would see an ad that looks like this one (h/t):





The difference between an ad like this and Jerome Corsi's book? There is NOTHING in this ad that is not a documented fact -- unlike the lunatic ravings of Mr. Corsi.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

I'm losing my job too, but that doesn't mean I'm going to shoot somebody
Posted by Jill | 9:44 AM
I don't even WANT to shoot somebody. I'm not even angry. When you work on grants, you have a job as long as there are grants. No grants, no job. Very simple. No, it isn't fun, and yes, it's scary, and it'll be scarier after August 29 when I am no longer on payroll. But it's nobody's fault, though I suppose I could point to the Republican goal to drown government in the bathtub and its impact on funding for the National Institutes of Health, which is from whence most of the grant money that paid me originated. The 2008 Bush Budget increased NIH funding by 1.1%, when the cost of medical research increases by 5-6% a year and following years of increased funding.

But it is what it is, and my priority right now is not finding scapegoats but to find another job. Because scapegoats won't pay the bills.

But for all that there is a tie, however tenuous you might think it is, between Republican policies and the funding decreases that have indirectly led to the elimination of my job, that doesn't mean I'm going to go track down a Republican party leader and shoot him.

But that seems to be at least part of the rationale driving Timothy Dale Johnson, the man who shot and killed Arkansas Democratic Party chair Bill Gwatney yesterday:

Police said Timothy Dale Johnson, 50, of Searcy, barged into Bill Gwatney's office on Wednesday and shot him multiple times. There were no signs that Gwatney and Johnson, who was later shot dead by officers, knew each other.

A Target retail store in Conway had fired Johnson early Wednesday because he had written graffiti on a wall, police said. Before noon, Johnson was in Gwatney's office in Little Rock with a handgun.

"He said he was interested in volunteering, but that was obviously a lie," said Sam Higginbotham, a 17-year-old volunteer at the party's headquarters.

After the shooting, Johnson sped away in a truck, stopped seven blocks away at the Arkansas State Baptist Convention and pointed a gun at the building's manager, police said. When asked what was wrong, the gunman said "I lost my job," according to Dan Jordan, the church group's business manager.

Officers chased the suspect to Sheridan, 30 miles south of Little Rock. After avoiding spike strips and a roadblock, the suspect emerged from his truck and began shooting at deputies and state troopers, who returned fire. Johnson later died at a hospital. Police found two guns in the truck.

Little Rock police Lt. Terry Hastings didn't say what the men discussed after Johnson entered Gwatney's office but said it was not a heated exchange.

"They introduced themselves, and at that time he pulled out a handgun and shot Chairman Gwatney several times," he said.


It sounds increasingly that Johnson was just a disturbed individual with too-easy access to guns, who was fired for cause rather than being a casualty of Bushonomics.

But in the larger picture, the incident makes me wonder if, as the job base continues to degrade and more and more people lose their homes to foreclosure, we're going to start seeing more of this. Americans have deluded themselves for years that if your values are in the right place and you work hard, you'll succeed. We continue to believe this even in the face of outsourcing, mass layoffs, and skyrocketing executive salaries combined with diminished executive accountability. Republicans have made hay for decades out of the "laziness" of those who can't find work. But if the potential working population is essentially twenty pounds of dung trying to squeeze into a ten-pound bag of available jobs, some are going to be left behind. And for those, perhaps it's time to stop blaming the victim and lionizing those who are behind the erosion of American jobs.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Thursday Music Blogging: Too Short Too Fat Too Old My Ass Edition
Posted by Jill | 7:13 AM
Sharon Jones and the Dap-Kings:



Labels:

Bookmark and Share

I'm not dead yet
Posted by Jill | 6:45 AM
For those of us who are not tall, slim, and leggy, finding clothes has always been a challenge. Whether it's having to cut ten inches off of every skirt because we're short, or having to take tucks in the waist of our jeans because to get them to fit through the hips means they're too big in the waist, or finding V-necks to wear to work that don't expose cleavage, it's a never-ending battle. And when you get older it's even worse. Once you get north of the big five-oh, less is more. Little gathered sleeves are out. Little floral prints look ridiculous. It's no accident that so many of us end up in long tunics and leggings, or "float" dresses, or some other fabric nightmare.

It's no wonder I hate shopping and do all my clothes shopping exclusively through catalogs. When I recently decided it was time to get out of the tunics-and-leggings and into some decent clothes, I found that there were three catalogs where I could always rely on finding reasonably-priced clothes that fit: Woman Within, most of whose stuff is crap, but which has nice pants and jeans for larger sizes that also have a 27-inch inseam; Coldwater Creek, where occasionally something is in their clearance section that I could wear, and J. Jill, which lures in repeat shoppers with e-mails offering good discounts and real bargains in their sale and clearance section.

Coldwater Creek, J. Jill, and other stores like them, use a very simple approach: less is more. Give the customer simple lines, good quality at a good price, a wide range of sizes for all body types, and interesting, rich colors, and you'll have a loyal customer.

It seems, though, that the coveted 18 to 30 demographic isn't interested in these clothes, and today the New York Times profiles the fate of Sigrid Olsen, a higher-end designer of this type of clothing for the too-old-for-Abercrombie crowd, in the context of the struggles of the very emporia where I shop:

THE call came late at night on the first Monday of January, delivering the news that Sigrid Olsen had feared for six months. Liz Claiborne Inc., after a review of its brands, was dismantling her 24-year-old fashion business, closing its 54 stores and laying off dozens of employees, including the designer herself.

Ms. Olsen, who spends much of the year at her longtime home here, began to call her staff in New York to explain what was happening in advance of a corporate announcement that would be made the next day. But what she could not explain was what had led to the demise of a peppy brand with a passionate customer base and peak sales of about $100 million, or why the sputtering Liz Claiborne conglomerate, which had entertained offers for Ms. Olsen’s label and others, had not chosen just to sell it.

“I thought that we were one of the brands they would want to keep and nurture,” Ms. Olsen said. “That was more shocking than anything.”

It is a curious development in the fickle business of fashion that clothing labels like Ms. Olsen’s, made by and for the baby boomer generation, are among those being hardest hit by the current economic turmoil and retail retrenchment. The restructuring of Liz Claiborne early this year also resulted in upheavals at more expensive labels: Ellen Tracy, which was sold; and Dana Buchman, which was pulled from department stores and will be remade more moderately for Kohl’s. At the same time, retailers like Ann Taylor, Talbots and J. Jill have been closing hundreds of stores around the country, and the consolidation of department stores over the last decade has left many malls with more vacancies than options for the enormous demographic of women in their 40s to 60s.


What does it say when empty storefronts in malls are preferable to shops that don't cater to the kinds of teens and twentysomethings that AREN'T seen at Obama rallies? The cruel irony, for both the Juicy Couture set and for those of us buying raisin-colored twinsets at J. Jill, is that because of the collapsing economy, the teens don't have the disposable income , and while at least some boomers have managed to hold onto their jobs and have the income, there are fewer outlets for them to spend it.

This should be a cautionary tale for everyone who thinks YOUR generation will somehow be different; that you will escape getting old; that you won't start to hear comments your mother used to make coming out of your own mouth; that you'll want to wear Kate Spade your entire life. Because if there was ever a generation that never thought it would happen to us, it's mine. And look at where we are.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Wednesday Big Blue Smurf Blogging
Posted by Jill | 9:15 PM
Today's honoree: Who else but the one, the only, Lower Manhattanite, who is the only person on earth (except maybe Driftglass) who can seamlessly tie together John McCain and Joe Besser as "Stinky" on the old Abbott and Costello show.

Money quote:

John McCain has gotten the eight fish stick dinner at Long John Silver's™ gratis for too many Goddamned years over his hyping his victimhood, and he's used the horrible spectre of his captivity as a shield and cudgel to silence anyone wno criticizes him, playing the “pity me” card as handily as if he had twenty of 'em up his sleeve on a spring loaded chute to his hand. It's been a veritable godsend for him whenever he's gotten hemmed up in his self-inflicted prisons of avarice and stupid.


But go read the whole thing. And yes, that's an order.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

It's DemocratIC Party, you heartless bastard
Posted by Jill | 7:27 PM
Nestled in the remarks made by various and sundry officials in response to the senseless shooting death of Arkansas DemocratIC Party chair Bill Gwatney today is this, from Arkansas Republican Party chair Dennis Milligan:

It is with great sadness that we have learned of the tragic death of Democrat Party Chairman Bill Gwatney. He was an admirable Arkansan and gave so much to this state and his party.


Even when a man is shot dead in his office, this -- boy, it's really hard to keep it clean right now -- hyperpartisan, petty, heartless moron, can't even let go of the "Democrat Party" horsepuckey.

These people really are shameless. And vicious. And mean-spirited.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Speaking of Hitmen…

Sometimes right wingers can’t wait for God to get around to doing their dirty work for them so they do things according to their busy schedule.

According to the NY Times:
Bill Gwatney, the chairman of the Arkansas Democratic party, was shot and critically wounded in his office in Little Rock Wednesday morning, police officials said.

The officials said a single gunman fired three shots at Mr. Gwatney, a former state legislator, in his office a few blocks from the state Capitol and then drove away.

A friend of the Gwatney family, who asked not to be identified, said Mr. Gwatney was near death at the medical center of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, and that doctors considered his wound inoperable.


The article doesn’t go on to say whether Mr. Gwatney, who is also a super delegate, pledged support for either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton but the Arkansas superdelegate list shows that he’d endorsed Hillary Clinton earlier this year.

That would at least seem to indicate that this wasn’t Obama-related.

Why did this as unnamed assailant shoot Mr. Gwatney three times, perhaps fatally? We’ll likely never know the exact reasons but I’m going to break from tradition and assume that this was a right winger before the facts start coming in. Because whenever something like this happens and I hang back out of fairness, it’s always shown that a conservative was behind it. As with the Unitarian church shooting in Tennessee earlier this summer.

But since Hillary’s now out of the race, with nothing but fast-fading hopes of getting into an Obama administration, this shooting doesn’t make any sense. But if this guy that the Arkansas police killed was a right winger as I suspect, don’t expect much sense to emerge outside of a four page manifesto written in blood, feces and crayon.

Update: The same article from the NY Times informs us that Mr. Gwatney just passed away. Deepest condolences go out to his family. Is the partisan divide really this deep?
Bookmark and Share

Thomas Friedman is starting to sound like one o'them lefty bloggers
Posted by Jill | 6:58 AM
And damn it, he owes us after spending the last decade extolling the virtues of outsourcing everyone else's job while his own was safe and defending George W. Bush's war.

But even so, we must give credit where it is due, and so kudos to Friedman (good Lord, did I just actually say that?) for pointing out that John McCain's bellowing about how Congress needs to get back to work on an energy plan is just so much hot air:

John McCain recently tried to underscore his seriousness about pushing through a new energy policy, with a strong focus on more drilling for oil, by telling a motorcycle convention that Congress needed to come back from vacation immediately and do something about America’s energy crisis. “Tell them to come back and get to work!” McCain bellowed.

Sorry, but I can’t let that one go by. McCain knows why.

It was only five days earlier, on July 30, that the Senate was voting for the eighth time in the past year on a broad, vitally important bill — S. 3335 — that would have extended the investment tax credits for installing solar energy and the production tax credits for building wind turbines and other energy-efficiency systems.

Both the wind and solar industries depend on these credits — which expire in December — to scale their businesses and become competitive with coal, oil and natural gas. Unlike offshore drilling, these credits could have an immediate impact on America’s energy profile.

Senator McCain did not show up for the crucial vote on July 30, and the renewable energy bill was defeated for the eighth time. In fact, John McCain has a perfect record on this renewable energy legislation. He has missed all eight votes over the last year — which effectively counts as a no vote each time. Once, he was even in the Senate and wouldn’t leave his office to vote.

“McCain did not show up on any votes,” said Scott Sklar, president of The Stella Group, which tracks clean-technology legislation. Despite that, McCain’s campaign commercial running during the Olympics shows a bunch of spinning wind turbines — the very wind turbines that he would not cast a vote to subsidize, even though he supports big subsidies for nuclear power.

Barack Obama did not vote on July 30 either — which is equally inexcusable in my book — but he did vote on three previous occasions in favor of the solar and wind credits.

The fact that Congress has failed eight times to renew them is largely because of a hard core of Republican senators who either don’t want to give Democrats such a victory in an election year or simply don’t believe in renewable energy.


Last week the friend who is afraid to vote for Obama because of the e-mail smears forwarded me another gem from one of her wingnut friends. This one was about the states in the U.S. where there is oil and that we should tell the "dipsticks" in Washington to get drilling. What the e-mail didn't say was that the oil leases in these states aren't being used and that it has nothing to do with Congress; and it also didn't say that at the same time as oil companies want to drill off the coast of the U.S., they are exporting an ever-higher percentage of the oil they do find. I don't usually forward political material to her, because she has pretty much decided who she's going to believe, but on this one I had to send it along. I can't fight vestigial racism, particularly racism that is not acknowledged by those who still have it (much as they would like to believe they don't), but I can fight complete and utter horsepuckey.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Swiftboating Goes Mainstream
Posted by Jill | 6:32 AM
Mainstream as in the front page of the New York Times and the ad sections of some progressive blogs, that is.

Swiftboater nutjob Jerome Corsi has a new book out about Barack Obama that ought to feed nicely into the fears of those "hard working Americans....white Americans" that Hillary Clinton talked about during her campaign. The book attempts to paint him as a stealth Islamofascist.

Now, books like this are nothing new. Regnery Press has been printing them for years. Apparently Regnery saves a ton of money on factcheckers, because the swill that this particular publishing house dishes out always seems to have missed that part of the editing process. But now the smear book has hit the big time, with this one being published by an imprint of Simon & Schuster whose chief editor is Mary Matalin. And just as in 2004, when a similar book about John Kerry, DID sway enough people to make a difference, this book is likely to do the same.

Simon & Schuster is no stranger to wingnuttia. I've written before about my days in the 1980's, working there as an editorial assistant for Erwin Glikes, one of the most respected editors of wingnuts. He went on to manage The Free Press at Macmillan, which published David Brock's book about Anita Hill, and then after Glikes' death, like Brock himself, that imprint switched sides.

I never understood how such a nice man could publish people like Norman Podhoretz, Allan Bloom, Dinesh D'Souza, and other titans of the neocon World o'Lunacy. I also never understood why someone who fancied himself so staunch a conservative managed to surround himself with young liberals, which the three of us who reported to him were. But I have no doubt that if Erwin were alive today, he would have had no qualms about publishing Obama Nation.

So the smear-the-liberals genre has transcended Regnery Press and its shady methodology of buying bestseller status through its network of its own book clubs and through wingnut talk show host web sites, and into the world of mainstream publishing and the front page of the New York Times -- which even admits that much of the book is horsepuckey:

Significant parts of the book, whose subtitle is “Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality,” have already been challenged as misleading or false in the days since its debut on Aug. 1. Nonetheless, it is to make its first appearance on The New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction hardcovers this Sunday — at No. 1.

The book is being pushed along by a large volume of bulk sales, intense voter interest in Mr. Obama and a broad marketing campaign that has already included 100 author interviews with talk radio hosts across the country, like Sean Hannity and G. Gordon Liddy, Mr. Corsi said on Tuesday.

The publisher is Threshold Editions, a division of Simon & Schuster whose chief editor is Mary Matalin, the former Republican operative turned publisher-pundit. And it is a significant, early success for Ms. Matalin’s three-year-old imprint, which is also planning to publish the memoirs of Karl Rove, President Bush’s longtime political guru. Threshold says it has undertaken an extensive printing effort for anticipated demand, with 475,000 copies of “The Obama Nation” produced so far.

“The goal is to defeat Obama,” Mr. Corsi said in a telephone interview. “I don’t want Obama to be in office.”

He said he was planning to aid several conservative groups that intend to run advertisements against Mr. Obama this fall, though he would not name them.

Mr. Corsi, who has over the years also written critically about Senator John McCain, Mr. Obama’s probable Republican opponent, said he supported the Constitution Party presidential nominee, Chuck Baldwin, and had not been in touch with McCain aides. He called his reporting on Mr. Obama, which he stands by, “investigative,” not prosecutorial.

Ms. Matalin said in an interview that the book “was not designed to be, and does not set out to be, a political book,” calling it, rather, “a piece of scholarship, and a good one at that.” She said she was unaware of efforts to link it to any anti-Obama advertising.


And I am Marie of Rumania.

Interestingly, the article does mention Cliff Schecter's book The Real McCain but snarkily notes that Schecter's book only has 35,000 copies in print and did not make the bestseller list. I guess we know which cocktail parties the editors of the Grey Lady and Jim Rutenberg, who wrote this article, attend -- and they aren't the ones at Cliff Schecter's house. Funny how a mainstream publishing house will allow a poorly-sourced book about a black Democratic candidate, but would never deign to touch a well-sourced book about a Republican. Of course, Simon & Schuster IS owned by Viacom, which is headed by Sumner Redstone. Redstone fancies himself a liberal Democrat, but he vociferously supported George W. Bush in 2004, saying:

"I look at the election from what's good for Viacom. I vote for what's good for Viacom. I vote, today, Viacom.

"I don't want to denigrate Kerry," he went on, "but from a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on. The Democrats are not bad people. . . . But from a Viacom standpoint, we believe the election of a Republican administration is better for our company."


Isn't it nice to be able to manipulate the discourse in an election simply by virtue of heading up a company that includes a major book publishing imprint, a major television network, numerous cable networks (and don't let the presence of Jon Stewart fool you; he's only there to make you think Viacom has no agenda and because he makes money for Sumner Redstone) and movie studios.

As for the presence of the ad on progressive blogs, there is an ad server that many of the alpha dog blogs feature, which places the ads right in the content of the blog, instead of on the sidebar. I know you've seen them. I visited one high-traffic blog last night and there was an ad for this book staring me right in the face. Now, I'd like to make a living from blogging as much as the next person, but I think we need to draw the line someplace. This book is getting quite enough help from the corporate media, I don't think we need to add to the money going into Jerome Corsi's pocket and that of Mary Matalin. I realize that one doesn't get to pick and choose with ad servers like this, but as someone who is of the generation that younger people always accuse of "selling out", all I have to say about this particular compromise of principle for lucre is, "Pot, meet kettle."

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, August 12, 2008

God is My Hitman.
(Tip o' the tinfoil hat to Mr. Sully at The Atlantic.)


In Boston back before the Braves went to Milwaukee, there was a saying: Spahn and Sain- Pray for rain. But James Dobson's Focus on the Family isn't resurrecting the rain dance for Boston's former aces Warren Spahn and Johnny Sain. They're literally praying for rain during the weekend at the Democratic convention in Denver late this month.

Yes, it's true. The GOP's long arm of Christ has gotten so desperate that they're asking their flock to bother God for "rain of Biblical proportions" (which still doesn't somehow explain how this bozo can ask for rain that doesn't flood people out of their homes. After the last Biblical flood, everybody on earth had terminal basement damage.).

It wasn't too long ago when Pat Robertson prayed that a hurricane headed for his Virginia headquarters be diverted to, say, a place rife with teh gays. Even more recently, Robertson said that Hurricane Katrina was God's way of saying "Thou Shalt Not Hireth Ellen Degeneres to Hosteth Yon Emmy Awards" to New Orleans (I guess His holy triptych didn't have lavender-colored indicators telling him about San Francisco, Provincetown, and Fire Island.). Then again, Robertson almost outdid himself mere weeks later when he warned Pennsylvania residents to not go crying to God when disaster strikes because it'll be God who'll do the striking because evil science-lovin' lib'rals chose to vote off the Board of Education the eight God-fearers who espoused Creationism.

So there you have it: God is my Hitman. And He will kill you if you're near the Democratic convention.

When called on this, the FOTF said the video was intended to be "mildly humorous." Like John McCain's attack ads on Barack Obama were intended to be humorous. Like every lame Republican attempt at humor with mortal, even murderous subtexts are just "jokes."

Sure it was. Very, very mildly humorous. So mild, in fact, that the video's been jerked off the FOTF's website but not before it went viral when, of all people, other Focus on the Family members objected to God's name being invoked by Christopaths who seem to think that He's their personal hitman.

"We're sorry, delegates. The Democratic nomination for the presidency of the United States has been called on account of rain, so McCain wins. Sorry to bring ya'll out here."

That's what these peckerheads envision. Seriously. I can smell the flopsweat all the way up here in Massachusetts. And my sense of smell sucks.

So, since rain's out, what other desperate plans does Focus on the Family have to derail Obama's chance of getting the nomination?

Well, there's this old standby:

Floodwaters would come in handy, hint hint.

Then there's this mildly humorous way of wasting the Almighty's time:

Hell, we'd even settle for a little more Mad Cow disease.

Then there's this trick that's always popular at birthday parties and exoduses:

But then again, praying for locusts is kind of redundant, anyway, since the Republicans will be flocking to Minnesota next month.
Bookmark and Share

Condolences to TBogg
Posted by Jill | 2:29 PM
It's often seemed as if cats rule the Web, what with Friday Cat Blogging and all. But one intrepid blogger has managed for years to buck the trend, and that is the one, the only, the often imitated but never duplicated TBogg. For years we've watched the Thursday Further Adventures of Satchmo and Beckham, and more recently, of the newest addition to Casa la TBogg, Fenway.

But today the TBogg clan has a hole in it where Satchmo used to be. We here at Casa la Brilliant know what that hole is like. We experienced it in 2000 and we will no doubt experience it again now that Maggie the Idiot Cat and Queen Jennifer Who Does Not Suffer Fools Gladly are getting up there in age. It's part of the bargain we make when we bring pets into our lives, but it's the part we never want to think about.

So our thoughts to out to the TBogg family today. We'll miss Satchmo too.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

"First they outsourced IT, and I said nothing because I was not an IT worker...."
Posted by Jill | 6:52 AM
If your job in any way involves generating paper, network packets, and talk, you are at risk of having it outsourced overseas. Because outsourcing isn't just for IT anymore:

Wall Street’s losses are fast becoming India’s gain. After outsourcing much of their back-office work to India, banks are now exporting data-intensive jobs from higher up the food chain to cities that cost less than New York, London and Hong Kong, either at their own offices or to third parties.

Bank executives call this shift “knowledge process outsourcing,” “off-shoring” or “high-value outsourcing.” It is affecting just about everyone, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Credit Suisse and Citibank — to name a few.

The jobs most affected so far are those with grueling hours, traditionally done by fresh-faced business school graduates — research associates and junior bankers on deal-making teams — paid in the low to mid six figures.

Cost-cutting in New York and London has already been brutal thus far this year, and there is more to come in the next few months. New York City financial firms expect to hand out some $18 billion less in pay and benefits this year than 2007, the largest one-year drop ever. Over all, United States banks will cut 200,000 employees by 2009, the banking consultancy Celent said in April.

The work these bankers were doing is not necessarily going away, though. Instead, jobs are popping up in places like India and Eastern Europe, often where healthier local markets exist.


And cheaper labor, which is the real motivation behind outsourcing. It shouldn't come as a surprise that the very same bankers who got us into this mess are looking to shore up their own jobs by jettisoning the grunts in the trenches -- even if those grunts were making six figures. As the hidden motivations of those behind the financial mess in this country become clear (most notably the systematic and deliberate elimination of the middle class), I have to wonder if jettisoning those six-figure junior level employees was part of the plan all along.

But if you really want to see the back of your own head explode, read this part of the same article:

Press officers for most banks asked not to be quoted or argued over semantics. For example, one spokesman said his bank’s fast-growing India support operations are not an outsourcing facility, but a “center of excellence”; another argued that large cost cuts at his bank’s New York and London headquarters were really “re-engineering” so the bank should not be included in such an article.


"Center of excellence." If the workers in India are so excellent, then why don't you want to pay them what you would pay workers here? For that matter, if they're so excellent, shouldn't you be paying them MORE?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, August 11, 2008

Az di bobe volt gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde!
Posted by Jill | 10:26 PM
...which is Yiddish for "If my grandmother had testicles she would be my grandfather", which is my response to Howard Wolfson for this little gem:

"I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," former Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson told ABCNews.com.

Clinton finished third in the Iowa caucuses barely behind Edwards in second place and Obama in first. The momentum of the insurgent Obama campaign beating two better-known candidates -- not to mention an African-American winning in such an overwhelmingly white state -- changed the dynamics of the race forever.

Obama won 37.6 per cent of the vote. Edwards won 29.7 per cent and Clinton won 29.5 per cent, according to results posted by the Iowa Democratic Party.

"Our voters and Edwards' voters were the same people," Wolfson said the Clinton polls showed. "They were older, pro-union. Not all, but maybe two-thirds of them would have been for us and we would have barely beaten Obama."


On what planet, Howard? Maybe you need to read Nate Silver's analysis of who the second choice of Iowa Edwards voters was. Hint: It wasn't your girl.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

The presumptuousness of John McCain
Posted by Jill | 10:13 PM
Except that when it's a 72-year-old white guy, they don't call it presumptuous when he decides, just like his ads that declare him so, that he's already the president:

It took four days and a growing chorus of criticism from conservatives before George W. Bush on Monday matched John McCain’s tough stance on Russia. Having on Monday morning again been upstaged by the Republican presidential candidate, who had called for the US administration to come together with its allies in “universal condemnation of Russian aggression” in Georgia, Mr Bush finally followed suit.


Sayeth Josh Marshall about this:

I see George "Macaca" Allen is on Fox explaining why John McCain's gonzo antics trying to get us into a nuclear confrontation over Georgia shows why we desperately need to make him president as soon as possible. But I do notice that McCain is bragging about how he's been repeatedly on the phone talking with the President of Georgia (as has Obama) and generally conducting his own mini-foreign policy.


But of course only Obama is being presumptuous. Because the punditocracy does not feel it needs a synonym for "uppity white guy."

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Another dispatch from the "Figure that out all by yourself, Einstein?" file
Posted by Jill | 9:50 PM
And after Queen Latifah went and lost 20 pounds eating miniscule portions of Jenny Craig's sodium-laden rotini and meatballs, too...but some of us knew this already:

You can look great in a swimsuit and still be a heart attack waiting to happen. And you can also be overweight and otherwise healthy.

A new study suggests that a surprising number of overweight people — about half — have normal blood pressure and cholesterol levels, while an equally startling number of trim people suffer from some of the ills associated with obesity.

The first national estimate of its kind bolsters the argument that you can be hefty but still healthy, or at least healthier than has been believed.

The results also show that stereotypes about body size can be misleading, and that even "less voluptuous" people can have risk factors commonly associated with obesity, said study author MaryFran Sowers, a University of Michigan obesity researcher.

"We're really talking about taking a look with a very different lens" at weight and health risks, Sowers said.


And it's about freaking time.

And while we're on the subject, it turns out you may not need Lipitor or Zocor either; that things you can get in the supplement aisle of your supermarket or the health food store can do just as well:

A regimen of supplements and lifestyle coaching is just as effective as statin medication for reducing levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or "bad" cholesterol, and more effective in helping people lose weight, new research shows.

People with high cholesterol who took red yeast rice and fish oil daily and received counseling on diet, exercise and relaxation techniques showed the same 40 percent drop in LDL cholesterol seen among people taking 40 milligrams of simvastatin daily, Dr. David J. Becker of the University of Pennsylvania Health System's Chestnut Hill Hospital and colleagues found. And they pared off an average of 10 pounds over 12 weeks, compared to less than a pound for patients taking the statin.

[snip]

With a grant from the state of Pennsylvania, Becker and his team randomly assigned 74 patients to receive 40 milligrams of simvastatin (Zocor) daily along with printed information on lifestyle changes, or to three capsules of fish oil twice daily and 600 milligrams of red yeast rice daily along with the 12-week lifestyle program.

LDL cholesterol levels fell by 42.4 percent in the red yeast rice group and by 39.6 percent in the simvastatin group, not a statistically significant difference. Triglyceride levels didn't change in the statin group, but fell 29 percent in the red yeast rice group, probably because they were taking fish oil, according to Becker and his team.

People in the red yeast rice group lost an average of 4.7 kilograms (just over 10 pounds), compared to 0.3 kilograms (less than a pound) in the statin group.

Red yeast rice comes from fermenting red yeast with rice. Known as hong ku, the substance has been used as a medicine and food garnish in parts of Asia for centuries, Becker said. It contains a substance called monacolin-K that is nearly identical to the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin (Mevacor), as well as several other monacolins that may also have cholesterol-lowering properties.

People in the red yeast rice arm of the study were taking the equivalent of 10 to 15 mg of lovastatin, Becker said. "This lovastatin dosage is quite small, yet the effects we saw with the red yeast rice were akin to those one would generally see with a much higher dose of lovastatin."


Except for one thing: The FDA goes after red yeast rice supplements containing lovastatin after in 2000, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that red yeast rice IS subject to FDA regulation. Three guesses as to why. Hint: Given the FDA's record of late, do you really think it's to assure that it's safe for you to take?

By the way, for those of you who refuse to take fish oil capsules because you "burp fishy", find a friend with a Costco card and get a big bottle of the Kirkland capsules. Keep them in the fridge, Take a capsule with meals and no burp, no fishy aftertaste.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Lowered Expectations

Did you all know that, like Teh General, Pottersville has its own dating service and that it’s free? It’s true! And, ladies, have I got a guy for you!

He’s conservative, great-looking in a vulnerable, ambiguously Brokeback Mountain sort of way and, best of all, he’s a college boy whose father Bob is in the US House of Representatives and is on the fast track to the US Senate! Say hello to Justin Schaffer, the future of America!

Justin’s original Facebook page, which contained some heartwarmingly nostalgic notions about race and gender relations, has been preserved in all its glory on a mirror site so this humble son of Republican America wouldn’t take it down in deference to his ambitious but equally humble father Bob.

Here’s a brief sample of the admirable political activism of Justin Schaffer:







Ah, ha ha ha! And people wonder where all those hilarious young Republican comedians come from! And, finally, not to be outdone by The manly General, there’s this take on Republican Jesus:



Now, lest you liberal ladies out there think that young Justin’s head is good only for stockpiling product, guess again. It ought to be noted that in addition to his college studies, Justin’s also a member of ROTC whose Facebook nickname is “Cap'n Bootyplunder”, no doubt a moniker that’ll be kept when he finally gets that coveted little gold bar on his epaulets. Until recently, Justin was also a proud member of “Pole Dancers For Jesus” and still belongs to “Hey, My Name’s Justin”, a thriving Facebook forum devoted to other young conservative McCain supporters who share his first name.

With typical Republican fairness and balance, Justin also, despite his hilarious anti-Obama, anti-black polemics, features a paid ad for Obama buttons on the top leftist side of his page. Republican principles be damned, this is money we’re talking about, meaning he’ll be a great provider, ladies!

Ah, but the apple never falls far from the tree as dear ole Dad can and has added to his Senatorial resume, “Supported America’s removal of Saddam Hussein in the war against radical totalitarian Jihadism. (H.J.Res. 64, RC Vote #342, 9/14/01; H.J.Res. 114, RC Vote #455, 10/10/02).” All of which being votes that, no doubt, will pay dividends as soon as we find those darned elusive Hussein/al Qaeda connections, weapons of mass destruction and some tangible evidence of Saddam making jihadist threats against America.

So who wants to be the one to pop this concupiscent conservative’s Republican-red cherry?
Bookmark and Share

I'm no Marc Maron, but I'll do in a pinch
Posted by Jill | 11:57 AM
Does this mean I'm a real blogger now?

I'm keeping this post at the top to remind you to all tune in to Sirius Indie Talk (channel 110) from 5:00 to 6:00 PM Eastern Time today, Monday, August 11, when I will be a featured guest on "The Blog Bunker."

I have no idea yet what topics are being covered, so I consider it to be an adventure.

If you have Sirius, please tune in, and if you can record it somehow and get me a copy of the show, that's even better. If you don't subscribe, you can get a free 3-day pass here.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Just when you think internet memes can't get any better
Posted by Jill | 6:25 AM
Someone tops even the best:





You've been Barack-rolled!

(Welcome to the blogroll, Mr. Atkin. For this you get your own category.)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Government civil service jobs: The Iraq "economic miracle"
Posted by Jill | 6:11 AM
How ironic is it that the Bush Administration's stated dream of Jeffersonian democracy and American-style capitalism in Iraq has instead resulted in a moribund private sector and an explosion in public-sector employment?

Hampered by years of violence, a decimated infrastructure, a lack of foreign investors and a flood of imports that undercut local businesses, Iraq’s private sector, particularly its small non-oil economy, has so far failed to flourish as its American patrons had hoped.

In its absence, the Iraqi government has been sustaining the economy the way it always has: by putting citizens on its payroll. Since 2005, according to federal budgets, the number of government employees has nearly doubled, to 2.3 million from 1.2 million.

The impetus is not only economic: In exchange for abandoning the insurgency that plunged the nation into civil war, many of the 100,000 members of civilian patrols known broadly as the Awakening movement have been promised jobs in the security forces or in reconstruction, though many Sunni Muslim members complain it is not happening quickly enough.

But this growth has not come without problems. Already, a huge wage increase to government workers that was instituted — but then suspended because of fears that it was pushing up inflation — has underscored the difficulties of being far and away the largest employer in an unstable country.

In 2006, 31 percent of Iraq’s labor force was working in the public sector, according to the agency for statistics in the Ministry of Planning. The agency expects that figure to reach 35 percent this year, about 5 percentage points short of where the C.I.A. estimated it to be on the eve of the 2003 invasion.

This figure is not atypical for the region, but it hardly indicates the free market state initially envisioned by the United States-led Coalition Provisional Authority, which pushed for full and rapid privatization in its first few months.


So much for a free-market miracle in the Middle East, eh? Add to that the results of deregulation here in the U.S. -- the mortgage mess, bank failures, the Freedi Mac/Fannie Mae disasters, tainted food, botched and haphazard hurricane Katrina handling and reconstruction, a staggering airline industry making pilots fly with barely enough fuel to get to their detinations if everything goes well -- it ought to be enough to nail the coffin shut forever on Republican so-called free market policies that benefit no one but the cronies of Republicans -- even in Iraq.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 10, 2008

"I don't see America having problems"
Posted by Jill | 10:34 PM
Want another four years of this kind of idiotic cluelessness? Then vote McCain.





(The quote is 2:26 in, in case you have a weak stomach and can't handle listening to this moron smirk and blather for the full nine-plus minutes of the video.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

How much do you think the airlines think your life is worth?
Posted by Jill | 10:01 PM
Before this is all over, I may very well end up ain "any job, no matter what they ask" mode. But for now, one thing I don't want is a job where I have to do a lot of traveling. Because I really hate to travel. Oh, I'd like to see Greece before I die, and do one of those Mediterranean cruises where you don't have to shlep suitcases from hotel to hotel. And I've been to Jamaica 19 times with Mr. Brilliant in our 25 years together. But I hate traveling. I hate the packing, the logistics, the airports, the cramped seating and inadequate ventilation. I hate sitting in airports. I hate sitting on the tarmac. I hate flight attendants who decide it's my job to spend my trip taking care of half-blind elderly women who are so terrified of flying they are praying to Jesus out loud for 4-1/2 hours. I hate turbulence. And you know what I really hate? I hate circling around Newark for an hour and then having the pilot say that we don't have enough fuel to circle any more so we're going to Pittsburgh -- only to find a half hour later that somehow we've miraculously gotten clearance to land at Newark after all.

That happened to us on ou return flight from Jamaica last year, and now I think I know what that was all about -- we were on one of those planes flying with virtually no extra fuel for a contingency. This is increasingly common as airlines try to save money:

Pilots are complaining that their airline bosses, desperate to cut costs, are forcing them to fly uncomfortably low on fuel.

Safety for passengers and crews could be compromised, they say.

The situation got bad enough three years ago, even before the latest surge in fuel prices, that NASA sent a safety alert to federal aviation officials.

There has been no action.

Since then, pilots, flight dispatchers and others have continued to sound off with their own warnings, yet the Federal Aviation Administration says there is no reason to order airlines to back off their effort to keep fuel loads to a minimum.

"We can't dabble in the business policies or the personnel policies of an airline," said FAA spokesman Les Dorr. He said there was no indication safety regulations were being violated.

The September 2005 safety alert was issued by NASA's confidential Aviation Safety Reporting System, which allows air crews to report safety problems without fear their names will be disclosed.

"What we found was that because they carried less fuel on the airplane, they were getting into situations where they had to tell air traffic control, 'I need to get on the ground,' " said Linda Connell, director of the NASA reporting system.

[snip]

Labor unions at two major airlines — American Airlines and US Airways — have filed complaints with the FAA, saying the airlines are pressuring members not to request spare fuel for flights.

American notified dispatchers on July 7 that their records on fuel approved for flights would be monitored, and dispatchers not abiding by company guidelines could ultimately be fired.

American said its fuel costs this year were expected to increase to $10 billion, a 52 percent over 2007. "The additional cost of carrying unnecessary fuel adversely affects American's financial success," the airline told dispatchers in a letter. Union officials responded that "it appears safety has become a second thought" for the company.


When you think about the kind of delays that happen at airports these days, whether due to weather, or increased air traffic, or mechanical problems, the idea that pilots are being pressured to carry only the bare minimum of fuel is downright terrifying. If your flights are in and out of a major hub like Newark, where it's a miracle there aren't more mishaps than there are, and where circling for an hour can be a routine occurrence, the idea of, say, six or seven flights reaching that critical mass of low fuel at the same time, is downright terrifying.

But this is yet another example of what happens when regulatory agencies decide that their mission is not to oversee, but to protect the industries they're charged with overseeing. This is why we have E coli in the meat, and salmonella in the jalapenos and drugs fast-tracked to the market without adequate safety studies. This is another example of what happens when you decide to make government so small you can drown it in a bathtub -- except where surveillance of Americans and sovereignty over women's bodies is concerned.

I don't think most airline pilots and flight attendants really want to play a kind of jet fuel Russian Roulette every time they go to work. And most passengers don't either.

(h/t)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Because everything is good news for John McCain and bad news for Barack Obama
Posted by Jill | 10:35 AM
Would somebody please put David Gregory back out on the dance floor with Karl Rove where he belongs and put Rachel Maddow in that 6 PM slot?

Gregory:

Welcome to Race for the White House on a busy Friday. I'm David Gregory -- happy to have you here. It's your stop for the fast pace, the bottom line, and every point of view in the room. Tonight, more on Edwards and the fallout from his admission today about a sexual affair: Is this another skeleton in the Democratic closet that Barack Obama must struggle to overcome? Will Edwards appear at the Democratic convention? All of that ahead.


"Another skeleton in the closet?" Uh...is there anyone anywhere in the country who has not yet heard by now that John Edwards has an affair? I hate to tell you this, Dave, but it's not in the closet anymore.

And are you SURE you want to talk about closets in the context of Democrats?

Because two can play this game:

Larry Craig:





South Carolina Sen. and McCain lackey Lindsey Graham.

Florida Governor Charlie Crist:




Former Florida state representative Bob Allen.

California Congressman David Dreier.

Do I need to go on?

And why should John Edwards' infidelity hurt Barack Obama, when John McCain's infidelity seems to be off-limits to John McCain's own candidacy? Forget for a moment about Vicki Iseman (who seems to have been disappeared since the story about her alleged romantic relationship with John McCain appeared in the New York Times), though if simple denial of an affair sufficed for John McCain it should have sufficed for Edwards, especially since no one followed up to determine if there was an affair, certainly not the National Enquirer. I'm talking about John McCain's adultery with Cindy Hensley when he was married to his first wife, Carol Shepp, whom he had decided was no longer attractive. But of course in Republican-land, as long as you marry your mistress and your ex-wife keeps her mouth shut, it's all perfectly OK.

I'm not defending infidelity here, not Edwards' nor McCain's nor anyone else's. Cheating is about the most hurtful thing you can do to a spouse, and frankly, if you want nookie elsewhere, at least have the decency to get a divorce BEFORE dipping your wick elsewhere so that at least your spouse is spared that humiliation and is playing on an even playing field where SHE can find someone else too. But when you have a Republican NOMINEE, not someone who dropped out months ago, about whom similar rumors were swirling not that long ago, and who is married to the woman with whom he cheated on his first wife, and who represents the so-called "family values", "sanctity of marriage" party, it seems to me that trying to pin John Edwards' adultery on Barack Obama is a stretch. Or a Stretch, since we're talking about David Gregory.

But given how David Gregory, like just about everyone else in the media, is so firmly in the tank for McCain, and how he's bound and determined to play the guilt-by-association game, let's send him back where he belongs -- at teh Starlight Lounge, dancing cheek-to-cheek with his best buddy, Karl Rove:



Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Wingnut Assassination Threat Against Barack Obama Watch for Sunday, August 10
Posted by Jill | 10:11 AM
Another one:

Authorities say a North Carolina man will undergo a psychiatric evaluation after being jailed on a charge of threatening to kill Barack Obama.

Federal documents identified the man held Friday as 48-year-old Jerry M. Blanchard. A criminal complaint says witnesses overheard Blanchard twice last month threatening to kill the presumptive Democratic nominee.

A Secret Service agent wrote in court documents that Blanchard may have mental health issues related to recent head injuries. Blanchard denied making the threat, according to the documents.


Or he may just be a wingnut whipped into a frenzy by racism and multimillion dollar talk radio hosts who have been saying for over a decade that liberals should be killed and blacks want special treatment.

These two recent threats against Barack Obama's life make the column that Dana Milbank wrote in the Washington Post on July 30, even more reprehensible. In that column, snarkily titled "President Obama Continues Hectic Victory Tour", he showed that in the eyes of the media, Obama can't win no matter what he does. They parrot the McCain campaign's question "Is he ready to lead", and then when he behaves like a leader, they say he's "acting like a president."

In that column, Milbank wrote:
The 5:20 TBA turned out to be his adoration session with lawmakers in the Cannon Caucus Room, where even committee chairmen arrived early, as if for the State of the Union. Capitol Police cleared the halls -- just as they do for the actual president. The Secret Service hustled him in through a side door -- just as they do for the actual president.


...implying that Obama's Secret Service protection was another symptom of his "hubris", or if you want to cut out even this small amount of journalistic nicety, his "uppity n----ishness". Milbank head is so far up the anal canal of John McCain that he has forgotten why Barack Obama was given Secret Service protection in the first place back in May 2007:

The government is not aware of any specific, credible threat against Obama, according to a law enforcement source familiar with the decision. But his office has received hate mail and calls and other "threatening materials" in the past and during his campaign, the source said.

[snip]

The Secret Service is authorized to provide protection to "major" candidates as determined by the advisory committee, under certain guidelines.

Among those guidelines, the candidate must be announced, be actively campaigning in at least 10 states and have some degree of prominence in the polls.


The fact that even as far back as May 2007, there were people intent on stopping Barack Obama by threatening to take his life, isn't enough reason for Secret Service protection, according to Dana Milbank and the other media apologists for John McCain. No, it's just another n---- who doesn't know his place.

And so from now until the election, we will hear media hacks dogwhistling to racists about "President Obama", and if God forbid one of these lunatics succeeds, then we'll hear all the handwringing about racism in the U.S.

Meanwhile, overseas, where they don't have to pretend racism doesn't exist in America, they're covering the very real threat Obama faces:

AMERICAN law enforcement agencies fear Barack Obama will be the target of a violent attack by white supremacists at the Democratic convention in Denver this month.
Ever since the Senator for Illinois emerged as the likely Democratic presidential candidate, neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan and similar groups have been making racist threats.

In an interview on Fox News, Railton Loy, Grand Wizard of the National Knights of the Ku Klux Klan International, said of Obama's presidential campaign: "I'm not going to have to worry about him, because somebody else down south is going to take him out... If that man is elected president, he'll be shot sure as hell. The hate would be so deep down south."

Meanwhile, websites and blogs have been buzzing with racist posts.

"Obama will die, KKK forever," says a post by "Rodney" on a blog run by a person identified only as Strider333. "The KKK or someone WILL assassinate Obama! If we get a N***** President all you N*****'s (sic] will think you've won and that the WHITE people will have to bow to you F*** THAT."

John W Hickenlooper, the Democrat Mayor of Denver, confirmed that he was aware of threats against Obama from white supremacists and other racist groups.

He added that the Denver Police Department was working closely with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Secret Service. He said: "We are looking at every possibility and making sure that we have prepared for every conceivable contingency. If someone is threatening violence we will go to great lengths to deal with that."

The federal government is providing Denver – and St Paul, Minnesota, where the Republicans are staging their convention at the start of next month – with $50m (£26m) each to cover the security costs of staging the conventions.

The Denver Police Department will nearly double in size, bringing in an additional 1,500 police officers from communities throughout Colorado and beyond. National Guard specialists trained to deal with biological, chemical, nuclear and radiological weapons will also be available.


And you'll be able to rely on people like Dana Milbank to declare Obama to be "presumptuous" (which is the new "uppity") because there is this much security around someone that American white racists, fueled by Republican-borne poverty, racism, beer, and guns, have vowed to terminate.

Oh, and while were on the subject of death threats against Democrats? House Minority leader John Boehner (R - Oil) has exhorted Americans to execute Nancy Pelosi.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

It's too bad that TV ads can only be 15 or 30 seconds
Posted by Jill | 7:29 AM
Because I think this, at just over three minutes, would be very effective:





It's an ad that would be effective even to those "hard working Americans....white Americans" that Hillary Clinton talked about, because, let's face it, it's a white guy in front of the camera. It's a white guy who's young, smart, well-spoken, and polite -- the kind of guy those "hard working white Americans" would be proud to have as a son. He doesn't go negative, he doesn't resort to inflammatory rhetoric, and he explains Obama's positions in a way even an idiot can understand.

The problem is -- how do you get this out there? Well, I'm trying to do my part.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share