"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Monday, November 12, 2012

Note to Republicans: You can't do it
Posted by Jill | 5:21 AM
So here we are, in the aftermath of an election which saw the candidate backed by racists and closeted homophobes and slut-shamers defeated by the dark-skinned incumbent who backs gay marriage and immigration reform, with the Republicans wondering what they have to do in order to reclaim the Immunity Idol.

NYT:

¶ Now the Republicans find their divisions newly revealed in the raw. By exposing the party’s vulnerability to potent demographic shifts, the 2012 results have set the stage for a struggle between those determined to rebrand the Republicans in a softer light and those yearning instead for ideological purity.

But before acceptance comes denial. And the party’s first challenge, it seems in the immediate aftermath, is to find common ground simply in diagnosing the problem. Though some leaders argued that basic mathematics dictates that the party must find new ways to talk about issues like immigration, abortion and same-sex marriage, others attributed Republican losses to poor candidate choice, messaging missteps and President Obama’s superior political operation.

“We continually crank out moderate loser after moderate loser,” said Joshua S. Treviño, a speechwriter in George W. Bush’s administration who now works for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a conservative group. He said Mitt Romney was part of a “pattern” of Republican nominees, preceded by John McCain, Bob Dole and George H. W. Bush, who were rejected by voters because of “perceived inauthenticity.”

By contrast, Ralph Reed, the longtime Republican strategist and chairman of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, said he would redouble efforts over the next four years to recruit women, Latinos and young people as grass-roots organizers.

“I certainly get the fact that your daddy’s Republican Party cannot win relying singularly on white voters and evangelicals alone — as critical as I believe those voters are to a majority coalition,” Mr. Reed said. “The good news for conservatives is there are many of those who have not always felt welcome in our ranks who share our values.”


Oh, really? And who, pray tell, are they? Those Latinos whom you continue to paint with a broad brush while insisting that you can trot out the Cuban-descended Marco Rubio and the Mexicans you've been demonizing for eight years will vote for them because they're Catholic? Young women who are just clamoring for mandatory transvaginal ultrasounds when the contraception to which you do not want them to have access fails? People who attend African-American churches who have heard you and your media flacks talk for the last four years about "food stamp president" and call this president "lazy" and wish he would "learn to be an American"? Which of these groups do you think is going to want to hear you couch your racism and your misogyny and your dream of returning to the world of Season 1 of Mad Men?

You want to know how to become a viable party again? Kick out the Galtians and the Krazy Kristians trying to work out their own childhood issues on the backs of sane Americans. You know who I'm talking about -- the billionaire CEOs in their 40,000 square foot houses who will cut jobs rather than absorb or pass on the fourteen cents on a pizza it would cost to provide health insurance. The radio "personalities" with the $400 million contracts who insist that wanting access to contraception as part of an overall health care plan makes you a slut and insist that the only thing black people want is food stamps. Fetophile congressmen who want abortion to be a crime for others but who press their own extramarital paramours to get abortions. Divorced legislators who oppose gay marriage on the grounds that marriage is sacred. Presidential nominees whose wives insist that shoving their religion in the face of people in other countries is exactly the same as putting your ass on the line in a minefield in Afthanistan.

Oh, wait. If you do that you won't have anyone left to buy your "I Got Mine And Fuck You" doctrine.

One thing that you develop when you have been the target of the white Christian male patriarchy's attempts to sustain power at all costs, is a pretty good horseshit detector. And you, Republican Party, are delusional if you think there's any way to put lipstick and a party dress on your hate-filled, social Darwinian ideology and make it palatable to the people you've been demonizing for two generations. It it looks like horseshit and it smells like horseshit, then it damn well IS horseshit. And we will call you on it with every attempt you make to call it otherwise. Because here in the reality-based community, you DON'T get to create your own reality.

Karl Rove discovered this on election night. The rest of you had better learn to deal with it. Because yeah, THAT's reality.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, November 06, 2012

Around the Blogroll and Elsewhere: Brief Republican Vote Suppression Edition
Posted by Jill | 6:01 AM
Brad Friedman on the unverified "mystery software patch" installed in 39 counties in Ohio, and the last-minute lawsuit hoping to stop it.

Digby: Disenfranchisement is a feature, not a bug.

Charlie Pierce on Sandy's secondary disaster.

No surprise here: So-called "True the Vote" forged signatures on their applications to be election observers in Ohio.

SemDem at DKos: Rick Scott is in a class by himself. All he's missing is the dogs and firehoses.

TBogg. 'nuff said.

You know, my good friend and blogbuddy jurassicpork and I disagree o what to do today. JP lives in Massachusetts, so he has the luxury of a protest vote. I disagree that a vote for a Green Party candidate, even as good a candidate as Jill Stein, will send a message to the Democratic Party. If Ralph Nader 2000 didn't send a message, nothing will. Third parties have to start at the local level and work their way up, not the other way around. I respect JP's decision and even agree with his reasons, even though I disagree with it. I disagree with it if for no other reason than I look at all the young women in this country and I see America's future -- a future that a bunch of grey-faced men want to take away from them, regarding them as little more than vessels -- incubators for producing enough white people to keep people like Willard Rmoney in power forever. If you think there's no difference between the two candidates on drones, or war, or banks, or multinational corporations, fine. But in my view, a protest vote in a state that could swing either way does nothing for those being murdered overseas, but does consign the next generations of American women to less-than-human status.

And the last word (heh) on the stakes today comes from, of all people, Tweety:



Yeah. What he said.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, September 24, 2012

Can he possibly be this stupid?
Posted by Jill | 9:18 PM
Willard Rmoney's grocery scanner moment:

On Monday, Mitt Romney offered a remedy to the problem that caused his wife’s airplane to land prematurely last week: Allow passengers to roll down the airplane windows.

Ann Romney’s plane was grounded Friday after the main cabin filled with smoke. The small electrical fire caused no injuries, but apparently did cause the Presidential candidate to forget the dangers of altitude.

“When you have a fire in an aircraft, there’s no place to go, exactly,” he told the LA Times. “And you can’t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don’t open. I don’t know why they don’t do that. It’s a real problem.”

Air crafts do not open windows because the cabins are pressurized to fly safely at an altitude of tens of thousand feet. Opening a window in an airplane would seriously sicken the passengers and crew.



***headdesk***

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, September 17, 2012

Greetings from one of the people Willard Rmoney just labeled a moocher.
Posted by Jill | 9:58 PM
"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax...my job is is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives." -- Willard Rmoney, Republican nominee for the Presidency of the United States


Hello, everyone. You know me, sort of. You haven't seen much of me lately, because I've been working. My timesheet the last couple of weeks has contained numbers like 67 hours, 71 hours, 78 hours. You haven't read much of my writing because I haven't had a complete day off since July 6, not even weekends. And even during that July 4 week when I burned four vacation days (the very existence of which makes me a "taker", not a "maker"), I spent the equivalent of about 2-1/2 days working.

I work for a giant multinational corporation. I started there in 2008, a month after I was laid off from my previous job, where I was paid essentially through government research grants. So I guess during those eight years I really WAS just a sucker at the government teat, just like Willard says. But today I work for a giant multinational corporation.

They seem to think pretty well of me. I have a nice little lucite plaque that says "Special Recognition Award" on it, and affixed to this plaque are three little badges. One of them says "Teamwork", one says "Delivering results", and the third says "Overcoming complexity." Last year the word "Senior" was put in front of my title, which has nothing to do with age, but did have to do with a reasonably sizable raise and a better bonus target. (No, it is not a financial firm, so the bonus is take-a-nice-vacation or add-a-deck-to-the-house size, not put-a-down-payment-on-a-Hamptons-house size.) Part of the reason I am being worked to death on the most difficult projects is because they know I'll put in the effort and move mountains to get it done. I may not like having no life, but I do like the work that I do.

I get paid every two weeks. I have pretty good benefits too, because the company I work for is not headquartered in the US and the countries it operates in tend to have strong worker protections and generous benefits. I'm lucky, because I carried the box of eight years of stuff out to my car on August 30, 2008 -- barely a month before the entire economy landed in the crapper. Two weeks later I had an offer from the company I work for now. Like I said -- lucky. Without this, I would probably still be an over-55 Cold Fusion web developer, still looking for a job. Or maybe I'd be in the Proofread College Essay business. You never know. But instead I was lucky -- luckier than most people my age. I remind myself of this on days like the one last week when I nearly had a stress meltdown in the office and pleaded sick so I could go home and work there the rest of the day -- and I drove home 14 miles down a New Jersey highway, screaming at the top of my lungs at no one.

I don't have consumer debt at the moment. I pay the mortgage on time. I've been married to the same man for twenty-six years. I have no police record. I've never been arrested. I don't litter, I donate to charity, I try to pay my main writer, and I'm nice to elderly people and small children. I pay a higher percentage of my income in taxes than Willard Rmoney does.

But in Willard Rmoney's world, I am a loser, a parasite, a "taker", not a "maker". Why? Because I'm going to vote for Barack Obama in November. It's not that I think he's done a spectacular job. Like many others, including some who write on this very blog, I'm bitterly disappointed by him. But he's about the best we've got, and the thought of a Republican-dominated government with an entitled, condescending jackass like Willard Rmoney is just too appalling and frightening to even contemplate.

David Corn has the entire ugly video here. Send it to your friends who think their lives will be better if they just elect an entitled sociopath to the presidency.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, August 29, 2012

No, they're not racist at all
Posted by Jill | 6:43 AM
Nope. Nosirree Bob, they're not. No racism whatsoever in this.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 19, 2012

Can This Nation Survive This Much Stupid?
Posted by Jill | 10:41 PM
We always knew there were yahoos out there. Us left-wing, communist, Jewish, homosexual pornographers in the Godless Heathen Liberal Northeast especially have always had images of guys with no teeth living in shacks with cars up on blocks in the front yard, a houn' dawg on the porch, and a whole messa guns. Or at least that's what the right thinks we think. They don't bother to explain this:



We expect guys like this to be out there in pockets of the hinterlands where they still refer to the Civil War as the War of Northern Aggression. But in the last few years they've been tempted by the siren song of K Street money and their Christian Crusade and started sending guys just like them to Washington. And as long as there were only a few of them, like Louie Gohmert (otherwise known as The Stupidest Fucking Moron Ever To Sit In Congress), we could point at them and laugh. But now, they're starting to make inroads into the upper house of Congress, and there's a very real chance that Democratic sellout Claire McCaskill may be booted out in favor of this guy:



Would someone please tell me what a "legitimate" rape is?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, May 21, 2012

Republicans sure do like that divine right of kings thing, don't they
Posted by Jill | 5:54 AM
And the Bushes are their royal family:
Jeb Bush’s name keeps floating up in discussions about candidates to run on the ticket with Mitt Romney, despite Bush’s efforts to douse the talk.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says Bush would most help Romney.

“He’d be an outstanding pick. It’s up to Gov. Romney but if I had to recommend a single person it would be Jeb,” Graham told The Hill. Graham urged his party to unify behind Romney last month after Rick Santorum exited the GOP presidential primary. Graham is a close friend of Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the 2008 Republican presidential nominee.

Most of the focus has been on Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who are thought to be the leading contenders on Romney’s short list. But chatter is picking up on Capitol Hill that Bush could be a dark horse.

Senior political strategists think Bush could deliver Florida for Romney and help him among Hispanic and Catholic voters.

[snip] “I can’t conceive of Jeb Bush being the vice president of anything. I see him being a presidential candidate, not this go-round but in the future,” said Don Gaetz, the incoming president of the Florida Senate, who has been a friend of Bush’s for more than a decade. Gaetz said “having him on the ticket would be the best chance to carry Florida” but thinks Bush is more likely to take a page out of Ronald Reagan’s playbook and tour the country.

“He might follow the path of Ronald Reagan and travel the country, make more contacts than he already has — and he has many — and articulate his message of economic and educational reform,” said Gaetz.

Gaetz noted that Bush is often asked to endorse candidates and as he has done so his collection of political IOUs has grown, which would be helpful to a future presidential run.

State Sen. John Thrasher, co-chairman of Romney’s campaign in Florida and another Bush ally, said he does not think Bush would accept an invitation to serve as running mate.

“I know him pretty well and I take him at his word. He says he’s not going to do it. I think he’s serious about not doing it,” said Thrasher, who spent time on the campaign trail with Romney Thursday.

Because princes don't play second fiddle to anyone, especially scions of families who believe THEY have a right to the Iron Throne.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, April 23, 2012

I think you already know the answer to that question, Mr. Krugman
Posted by Jill | 6:24 AM
Paul Krugman, NYT, today:
Just how stupid does Mitt Romney think we are? If you’ve been following his campaign from the beginning, that’s a question you have probably asked many times. But the question was raised with particular force last week, when Mr. Romney tried to make a closed drywall factory in Ohio a symbol of the Obama administration’s economic failure. It was a symbol, all right — but not in the way he intended. First of all, many reporters quickly noted a point that Mr. Romney somehow failed to mention: George W. Bush, not Barack Obama, was president when the factory in question was closed. Does the Romney campaign expect Americans to blame President Obama for his predecessor’s policy failure?
Yes, it does, and yes, it's going to work. All I have to do is walk around my own neighborhood in my little Republican-leaning town to know that it's going to work. In previous springs, you'd see contractor signs on every street, the skeletons of add-a-levels rising from what used to be the roofs of 1950's ranch and cape cod houses. This year, we see the green stains of moss on the sides of the vinyl siding that was put on the add-a-levels of years past. Down the street is a foreclosure with some kind of paper sign in the window. It used to be a cute, well-maintained cape, but finally went into foreclosure after two years in the process. I'm told that the basement was flooded during Hurricane Irene last year and the bank didn't do anything about it. Down the street is a house that had its add-a-level built only about four years ago. The "For Sale" sign now has an "under contract" addendum, because they listed it for about $150K than it would have in 2006. Speculation is that it's either a divorce or someone lost a job and they can't afford to pay the second mortgage for the add-a-level anymore.

The through streets that attract tractor-trailers looking for shortcuts to the waste facility in the next town are chewed up and not even quick asphalt tamp-down patches are being done. We have a strip mall that serves as a downtown. It's 1/3 empty, and the restaurant and two take-out places that are the only two businesses to open there in the last three years have had to resort to placing signs in front of the shopping center. And yet residents of this town are gung-ho to spend $1.8 million putting artificial turf on the sports fields, to make them the "crown jewel" of our town.

Americans got used to instant gratification during the Bush years, as they bought McMansions and turned postwar tract housing into ersatz ones. They took leases on SUVs so they could drive more vehicle than they could afford to buy and fancied themselves to be adventurers. They pulled their kids out of school in mid-year to take them on Caribbean vacations. People in towns like mine saw Louis Vuitton and the newly-plastic Coach handbags as their due. Then it all came crashing down, and someone must be blamed. And if the person to blame feeds into the sub-surface racism of this town that is still, even in this decade, 96% white, even better.

Americans have forgotten, or never quite realized, just how close we came to global economic collapse in 2008. You don't dig out of a hole that quickly. The crisis occurred just as George W. Bush was getting ready to leave office, and while the incoming administration knew things were bad, I'm not sure even they knew just how bad until they took office.

There are still millions of Americans unemployed. There are hundreds of thousands of people who have lost their homes, and more who still will. But it is better. It's infinitesimally better, but it's better. It could have been even better were it not for intransigent Republicans whose verbalized, stated agenda from January 20, 2009 has been to ensure that Barack Obama is a one-term president, and for this president's pathological insistence that he can somehow do business with such people. These are the people who have a vested interest in keeping the economy weak through the November election. And yet, almost half of Americans want to give power back to these people. They don't like the liver and onions, so they're willing to eat the pile of dogshit, just because it's something different. Yes, Mr. Krugman, the Romney campaign does expect Americans to blame President Obama. Because we live in a nation of idiots, and they will.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, April 20, 2012

Meet Mr. Romney's new BFF
Posted by Jill | 6:43 AM
For those of you who are not familiar with the Ted Nugent oeuvre, let me give you a brief introduction:

Ive got no inhibitions
So keep your keys out of your ignition
I steal a car like I got the curse
I cant resist the old lady's purse
Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know Ive got to have you in a matter of time

Well I dont care if youre just thirteen
You look too good to be true
I just know that youre probably clean
Theres one lil' thing I got do to you

Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know Ive got to have you in a matter of time

So tell your mama that Im back in town
She likes us boys when its time to get down
Shes got this craving for the underage
I just might be your mama's brand new rage

Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know I got to have you in a matter of time

Honey you you you look so nice
Shes young shes tender
Wont you please surrender
She's so fine shes mine
All the time, all mine mine
Its all right baby
Its quite all right I asked your mama
Wait a minute officer
Dont put those handcuffs on me
Put them on her and Ill share her with you

Nice, huh? Just for the record, Ted Nugent was thirty-three years old when this song was released in 1981. Just another good Christian family-values Republican, right?

(Hell yeah, there's plenty more here.)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 27, 2012

It's not just about abortion...OR birth control. They just hate women and want a legally-enforced patriarchy. Period.
Posted by Jill | 6:22 AM
I've been saying for years that the minute the right is successful in having abortion made a capital crime, they'll go after birth control. I was right about that, but even I never dreamed that as much as the GOP wants to codify patriarchy and the subjugation of women through government, they'd stoop to this in ANY state, let alone New Hampshire:
Since the 1970s, New Hampshire police have operated under a progressive policy for handling domestic violence cases that has saved countless lives. Under current law the presumption is that an arrest will be made when police observe evidence of abuse. They have a large degree of discretion and don’t need to witness the assault firsthand or obtain a legal warrant before they can separate the alleged attacker from his victim.

All that will change if Republicans get their way. The state’s GOP legislators are pushing two bills that will reverse a half century of progress, the Concord Monitor reports:


Domestic violence is no longer taken lightly legally or by society. That’s the way it should be, but two bills under consideration by this most unusual of legislatures, would undo that progress and put lives in danger. Both deserve a speedy defeat.


House Bill 1581 would turn the clock back 40 years to an age when a police officer could not make an arrest in a domestic violence case without first getting a warrant unless he or she actually witnessed the crime. That’s an exceedingly dangerous change. Consider the following scenario, one outlined for lawmakers by retired Henniker police chief Tim Russell:


An officer is called to a home where she sees clear evidence that an assault has occurred. The furniture is overturned, the children are sobbing, and the face of the woman of the house is bruised and bleeding. It’s obvious who the assailant was, but the officer arrived after the assault occurred. It’s a small department, and no one else on the force is available to keep the peace until the officer finds a judge or justice of the peace to issue a warrant. The officer leaves, and the abuser renews his attack with even more ferocity, punishing his victim for having called for help. [...]

It’s impossible to say how many lives the policy, in place since the 1970s, has saved or how many injuries it’s prevented. If they adopt House Bill 1581, lawmakers might find out, but the price paid could be extraordinarily high.


The other bill Republicans have proposed, HB 1608, limits judges’ ability to order the arrest of someone who has violated a domestic violence restraining order by contacting or abusing the person named in the order. It would also prevent judges from ordering defendants to surrender their weapons or block them from buying guns.

Because as far as Republicans are concerned, if the bitch won't obey, you can slap her around. And if she still won't obey, you can shoot her to death. It's all good with them.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, September 17, 2011

This is what "Let him die" looks like
Posted by Jill | 3:55 PM
Bookmark and Share
Thursday, September 15, 2011

And just when you thought Mitt Romney was the only Republican presidential candidate who isn't batshit crazy
Posted by Jill | 9:14 PM
I guess he just looked sane when compared to Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry. Because what else other than batshittery explains this:
Mitt Romney yesterday praised former Vice President Dick Cheney, saying he would seek a running mate who shared many traits of longtime, and often controversial, political figure.

At a town hall meeting in a retirement community in Arizona, Romney was asked whether he would name a Tea Party person as his vice presidential nominee. He didn’t answer directly, instead saying that his “overwhelming critera” was that they be ready to become president.

“I think it was last weekend I was watching C-SPAN, and I saw Vice President Dick Cheney and he was being asked questions about a whole host of issues -- following 9/11, the affairs in various countries in the world,” Romney said, according to MSNBC . “And I listened to him speak and said whether you agree or disagree with him, this is a man of wisdom and judgment, and he could have been president of the United States.”

“That’s the kind of persona I’d like to have – a person of wisdom and judgment,” he added.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, September 13, 2011

It's all so disheartening...
Posted by Jill | 5:36 AM
Let's face it. We all know just as sure as we're sitting here that Barack Obama's "jobs bill" is going to be gutted by the house so that it includes nothing but tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, the Senate will mewl ineffectually, and it will go to Obama's desk as a tax cut bill, where he will sign it and tell us that it's a bipartisan triumph. We've read this script so many times before it's a wonder that they don't just skip the kabuki theatre and go right to the mass execution of everyone who isn't a CEO.

So it's not like many of us see voting Democratic as any kind of an alternative or brake on the sheer meanness that is today's Republican Party.

But some of the reactions of the teabagger audience at last night's Clown Car Debate O'Hate makes us fearful for what a nation under someone like Rick Perry is going to look like.

Here the audience applauds the idea that if someone doesn't, or can't afford to, buy health insurance, we should just let them die if they get sick (and remember...these people also tend to regard themselves as "pro-life" where feti are concerned):



I only wish Blitzer had then asked the question again with the person in need of emergency care being a child.


I don't want to hear anyone complaining about when Alan Grayson said the Republican health care plan was "Don't get sick, and if you get sick, die quickly." There's nothing he said that wasn't true.

And this crowd is ready to string Ben Bernanke up from a tree:



And here's the debate in only 100 seconds of your time, for those of us who felt that the remaining time in our lives is too valuable to spend listening to the ravings of the insane. Note the opening montage, in which CNN treats the campaign for leader of the free world as if it were WWF wrestling:



And one of these people will in all likelihood be the next president.

Gee, thanks, Mr. Obama. Thanks for nothing.

(TPM liveblogged the whole thing, intrepid souls that they are.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, September 09, 2011

All you need to know about the Republican candidates
Posted by Jill | 6:53 AM
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Best. Freudian. Slip. Ever.
Posted by Jill | 7:41 PM
Give a Republican enough of an opportunity, and he'll reveal himself every time. Listen carefully to what Rick Perry says 16 seconds into this video:



Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 14, 2011

Around the Blogroll and Elsewhere: Special Republican Clown Car edition
Posted by Jill | 6:33 AM
Before I proceed to the linkitude, I want to congratulate my and longtime friends Gabriel (my original blogbrother) and Dennis on 19 years of showing those irresponsible, hedonistic red staters what love and commitment look like.

Now, our shirts are clean and pressed and our haircuts are precise, so let's start the show:

Tom Degan, who can always be relied on for some damn fine rantin', makes me want to go downstairs and dig out Mr. Brilliant's copy of "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail" for some summer reading now that I have a brief breather of living like a normal person.

Addicting Info has the Bachmann/corn dog photo you've all been waiting for. And Down With Tyranny has even more fun photos from Crazytown, Iowa.

More hilarious Iowa Straw Poll photographs at Princess Sparkle Pony's photo blog. Nothing like people with a million dollar line of credit at Tiffany's pretending to be Just Like Iowa Farm Folks.

Batocchio: Thou Shalt Not Question Supply-Side Jesus.

Beeryblog identifies America's dummy belt.

At Driftglass, a Photoshop job that should give you nightmares. Especially since the homonculus you're looking at is going to be the next president.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, July 14, 2011

Well, Mr. Bolling, that's because you are an idiot.
Posted by Jill | 5:29 AM
Warning: Your cranium may combust at this:



Oh yes he did (1:31 in):
"We can certainly say between 2000 and 2008, I don't remember ANY terrorist attacks on U.S. soil during that period of time."

Mr. Bolling, let me refresh your memory:



Oh yes, I forgot. In Super Magic Fox News Revisionist History Collapse Time, that happened on Clinton's watch. (So did the Iraq War. And I think the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby may have as well. Super Magic Fox News Revisionist History Collapse Time works that way.)

(h/t)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, July 06, 2011

Ohio isn't leaving anything to chance in 2012
Posted by Jill | 6:09 AM
Ohio Governor John Kasich and his legislature of Republican goons is doing an even better job than Ken Blackwell did in 2004 to make sure that Ohio goes 100% Republican in 2012:
A sweeping overhaul of Ohio's election laws passed the Senate on a party-line vote yesterday, and a bill requiring Ohio voters to present a photo ID before casting a ballot is now on track to move next week.

After a day filled with heated rhetoric and shifting plans, majority Republicans pushed through House Bill 194, which moves the 2012 presidential primary from March to May.

The bill, which the House is likely to send to Gov. John Kasich next week after approving Senate changes, would let Ohioans register to vote or change their addresses online and reduce early voting from 35 days before an election to 21 days by mail and 17 in person - which eliminates the so-called "golden week" when people could register and vote on the same day.

Bob Fitrakis:
Under the direction of GOP Governor John Kasich---himself the beneficiary of a dubious vote count in 2010---the Ohio Republicans are clearly determined to make it as difficult as possible for traditional Democrats to register, vote or get their votes counted in future elections.

Since 2000, the Republicans have eliminated more than a 1.5 million voters from the Buckeye state voter rolls. The purges have been centered on urban voters. Moreover, in 2004 hundreds of thousands of additional Ohio voters were disenfranchised by orchestrated bottlenecks at polling places that forced people to wait seven hours and more in line. The lines were most evident in the heavily Democratic urban areas of Cincinnati, Columbus and Cleveland.

But in 2008, because the Democrats controlled the legislature and state house, voters were allowed to cast their ballots up to 35 days before election day. The lines disappeared. Polling places were voter-friendly, with election workers giving voters clear directions on how to proceed.

Now the GOP is intent on ending all that. Ohio HB 194 slashes the timeframe for early in-person voting from 35 days to 16. The new law also prohibits Ohio’s 88 counties from mailing absentee ballots to all voters, or to pay the return postage. (In 2004, thousands of absentee ballots never made it to the county boards of elections because they had a pre-printed space for one stamp when they actually required two, and most voters only put on one stamp).

The HB 194 law also prohibits local board of elections officials from designing systems that best meet the needs of their community. For example, it forbids the county boards of elections from setting up off-site early voting locations. Banning voter-friendly practices such as pre-paid postage for absentee ballots and convenient places for citizens to vote, the law mandates practices design to lower turnouts as much as possible.

In perhaps the Bill’s most shocking provision, pollworkers are prohibited from helping voters find the right precinct line at the polling site. They are actually barred from answering questions or providing directions to voters.

In the 2004 election, then-Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, the co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign in Ohio, directed that any voter in the right polling place but in the wrong precinct, could not have his or her vote counted. Prior to Blackwell, Ohioans would have had all of their votes counted in that case, except for the rare precinct-level vote which would usually be about alcohol sales.

Now the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Ohio has written the legislature to ask: “Why else would we expend scarce taxpayer dollars on training and paying pollworkers? Ohio should not pass legislation that tells pollworkers not to do their job.”

HB 194 also overrides an the existing law---passed after the 2004 debacle---that required pollworkers to direct voters to the correct precinct. As the ACLU puts it: “Pollworkers will not be allowed to direct voters to the correct precinct or help them fill out forms correctly, both of which are required for a ballot to be counted. This will lead to more ballots that are not counted, and likely more lawsuits.”

The ACLU adds that HB 194 “…shifts responsibility for fair elections off of taxpayer-paid election officials whose job it is to administer elections, and on to the voters, who have a constitutional right to vote.”

The intent of Governor Kasich and the Republican-dominated legislature in Ohio is clear. Whatever minor detail they can find will be used to prevent Ohioans from voting. As the ACLU puts it, voters are "guilty until proven innocent, by assuming that all errors are voters' errors.”

In a separate bill---House Bill 159 (see Free Press Article) the Republicans will disenfranchise an estimated 900,000 Ohio voters, primarily Democrats, by requiring a photo ID to vote. Under the bill, an Ohio voter must produce either an Ohio driver's license, or an Ohio state ID card, military ID, or U.S. passport. IDs with photos and address provided by Ohio colleges or universities are prohibited as well as any ID provided by a county board of elections.

In a courageous move, Republican Secretary of State John Husted has come out against HB 159. In a speech to the League of Women Voters of Ohio, Husted said “I believe if you have a government-issued check, a utility bill in your name with your address on it, that no one made that up, they didn’t call AEP and establish utilities in their name to commit voter fraud. Let’s be clear about this. There are some other forms that are legitimate.”

The League of Women Voters, the American Association of Retired People of Ohio (AARP), Project Vote, and the ACLU all join Husted in opposing House Bill 159. But its passage seems all but assured.

And taken in tandem with HB 194 and the rest of the GOP assault on the ability of working Ohioans to vote, the day when Democrats had any chance of carrying any or all of swing state Ohio may be long gone.

It's tempting to think that presentation of a photo ID isn't all that much to ask, except that anyone who has ever spent the better part of the morning at a motor vehicle department knows how much time it can take to deal with officialdom. Students who must attend class and low-income workers who are paid by the hour, punch a time clock, and do not have the luxury of taking time off to stand in line waiting for a photo ID are going to be disproportionately affected by this new law -- and that's precisely the point. The low-income citizens of Ohio who cannot take time off work to get a photo ID, the elderly who are not able to stand for hours on end waiting for the gears of officialdom to grind out a photo ID -- these are voters who tend to vote Democratic. And of course that's precisely the point.

In the face of ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that there is any kind of systemic problem with people who are ineligible to vote going to the polls, the Republicans are attempting to disenfranchise as many people as possible who might be unlikely to vote in their direction. They're doing it with onerous voting laws, they're doing it with redistricting, they're doing it any way they can. There won't be another Florida 2000 happening, because Republican governors are making damn sure that no vote will ever be close enough to warrant any scrutiny in the future.

Republicans know that they cannot win on ideas, because they have none, other than elminiating Social Security and Medicare, and cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans and corporations. So they're making sure that their policies don't hurt them at the ballot box by keeping away anyone who might dare question them.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 03, 2011

What do you expect when you elect a criminal to the governorship?
Posted by Jill | 6:30 AM
No, I'm not talking about Chris Christie, who is being nominated for sainthood on Morning Schmoe even as I speak for writing a check to reimburse the state of New Jersey, a state in which everyone is being called upon to sacrifice, for taking a state police chopper to his son's baseball game and then having a limo waiting to drive him 100 yards to his seat.

No, I'm talking about Rick Scott of Florida, for whom questions are finally being raised in the mainstream press (thank you, Rachel Maddow, for embarrassing them into covering this) about his penchant for drug testing the immediate world -- and his own financial interest in such drug testing:
One of the more popular services at Solantic, the urgent care chain co-founded by Florida Gov. Rick Scott, is drug testing, according to Solantic CEO Karen Bowling.

Given Solantic's role in that marketplace, critics are again asking whether Scott's policy initiatives - this time, requiring drug testing of state employees and welfare recipients - are designed to benefit Scott's bottom line.

The Palm Beach Post reported in an exclusive story two weeks ago that while Scott divested his interest in Solantic in January, the controlling shares went to a trust in his wife's name.

This raised a groundswell of concern and questions about his health policy initiatives, especially his push to move Medicaid into private HMOs. Solantic does not take Medicaid but does business with private Medicaid HMOs. The questions are growing louder with Scott's executive order on drug testing.

Gee, ya think?

This is today's Republican governance -- populated by greedy rich bastard/crooks like Rick Scott, and I-Got-Mine-And-Fuck-You grifter/suckers at the public teat like Chris Christie.

And you want to give power back to these people? Are you f***ing kidding me?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

This may not be as silly as it looks on the surface
Posted by Jill | 5:29 AM
After all, Republicans have been able to claim, with some success, that the 9/11 attacks were Bill Clinton's fault, that TARP (instituted in 2008) was Barack Obama's program, that George W. http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifBush'shttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif presidency was a success, and that Bush deserves the credit for capturing Osama Bin Laden.

So with their ability and willingness to rewrite history, why WOULDN'T Newt Gingrich run as a devout, devoted husband to his lovely wife Callista, whom he was fucking on the side while married to his second wife, whom he was fucking while married to his first? http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Still in her 20s when they met, Ms. Bisek had been raised in a town of 1,500, the only child of a meat packer and a secretary. A churchgoing Roman Catholic, she had attended a Lutheran college where she practiced piano five hours a day. “Is this the wisest course for you to be taking?” Karen Olson, her best friend, recalled asking.

Today, Ms. Bisek is Mrs. Gingrich, married for 11 years, but perhaps best remembered for the six-year affair that contributed to her husband’s political downfall. His critics cast Mr. Gingrich, the former House speaker, as a hypocrite who sought to impeach a president over infidelity while engaging in it himself with Ms. Bisek, who was a Congressional aide.

Yet in a curious tale of Washington reinvention, the onetime congressman from Georgia is counting on the third Mrs. Gingrich for his political redemption.


As he prepares for a Republican presidential primary run — he said Monday that he would formally declare his intentions on Wednesday — Mr. Gingrich is presenting himself as a family man who has embraced Catholicism and found God, with his wife as a kind of character witness. Depending on one’s point of view, she is a reminder of his complicated past, or his secret political weapon.

Barely a sentence goes by without Mr. Gingrich uttering the words “Callista and I.” They are constantly together — at the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast in Washington, at conservative political conferences, at book signings and screenings of their documentary films. She is the voice on his audio books; her face is all over his 2012 Web site, where visitors can read “A Note from Newt & Callista.”

At Villanova University on a recent Thursday night, Mrs. Gingrich warmed up the audience for a showing of the couple’s movie about Pope John Paul II by signing books and DVDs in her left-handed curlicue. But when asked whether she is ready for the scrutiny a campaign would bring, she smiled tightly and grew silent.

Mr. Gingrich answered for her. “Seems to be,” he said, with uncharacteristic tentativeness. “We’ve talked about it for a year. It’s difficult.”

Mr. Gingrich is well aware that social conservatives are skeptical of him because he did not emphasize their issues in Congress, but also because of his two divorces and admission of infidelity. He has been meeting with religious leaders around the country to address their concerns.


What concerns could they possibly have? After all, didn't Jesus die on the cross so that Newt Gingrich could fuck whoever he wants? Isn't that what Gingrich means when he talks about his belief in a "forgiving God"? That HE's allowed to do whatever he wants to because a Jewish guy some two thousand and some-odd years ago went through unspeakable agony so he could do it?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share