"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Monday, November 19, 2012

The stupidest fucking article ever written by someone not named "Peggy Noonan"
Posted by Jill | 3:07 PM
If I hadn't checked the authorship of this, I'd have sworn it was penned by Rich Lowry.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, September 24, 2012

Can he possibly be this stupid?
Posted by Jill | 9:18 PM
Willard Rmoney's grocery scanner moment:

On Monday, Mitt Romney offered a remedy to the problem that caused his wife’s airplane to land prematurely last week: Allow passengers to roll down the airplane windows.

Ann Romney’s plane was grounded Friday after the main cabin filled with smoke. The small electrical fire caused no injuries, but apparently did cause the Presidential candidate to forget the dangers of altitude.

“When you have a fire in an aircraft, there’s no place to go, exactly,” he told the LA Times. “And you can’t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don’t open. I don’t know why they don’t do that. It’s a real problem.”

Air crafts do not open windows because the cabins are pressurized to fly safely at an altitude of tens of thousand feet. Opening a window in an airplane would seriously sicken the passengers and crew.



***headdesk***

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 19, 2012

Can This Nation Survive This Much Stupid?
Posted by Jill | 10:41 PM
We always knew there were yahoos out there. Us left-wing, communist, Jewish, homosexual pornographers in the Godless Heathen Liberal Northeast especially have always had images of guys with no teeth living in shacks with cars up on blocks in the front yard, a houn' dawg on the porch, and a whole messa guns. Or at least that's what the right thinks we think. They don't bother to explain this:



We expect guys like this to be out there in pockets of the hinterlands where they still refer to the Civil War as the War of Northern Aggression. But in the last few years they've been tempted by the siren song of K Street money and their Christian Crusade and started sending guys just like them to Washington. And as long as there were only a few of them, like Louie Gohmert (otherwise known as The Stupidest Fucking Moron Ever To Sit In Congress), we could point at them and laugh. But now, they're starting to make inroads into the upper house of Congress, and there's a very real chance that Democratic sellout Claire McCaskill may be booted out in favor of this guy:



Would someone please tell me what a "legitimate" rape is?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, August 12, 2012

The reaction from Florida
Posted by Jill | 6:52 AM
When I want to know what's going on in Florida, or the reaction to Willard Rmoney's pick of The Man Who Would Steal The Rest Of The Social Security Trust Fund And Take Away My Father's Chemotherapy And My Mother's Pulmonologist Don't Kid Yourself That This Is Just For The Under 55 Set, I go to the comments sections of the newspaper sites.

First, some samples from the Naples News. Naples in in Southwest Florida. It's not dominated by seniors the way the east cost is, but it's so wingnutty that liberals tiptoe around the topic of politics at parties, lest fights break out. The word from the local populace:

"This is the beginning of the end of the homosexual takeover of America!"

(Are you sure of that? Paul Ryan IS very dapper and does P90X....

"Lets hope that Connie Mack and Bill Nelson are yesterdays news!! Vote out all incumbents!!"

(You DO know, don't you, that Connie Mack is running AGAINST Bill Nelson, right?)

"Never heard of Paul Ryan but he looks like Anthony Wiener's twin. Perhaps a gambit by Romney to round up the women and perv vote. Who knows? A warning to young men, unless you thrive on nightmares and sexual confusion, avoid the image of Wasserman Schultz."

I feel the republicans made the best choice they could from a very weak group of candidates........What bothers me is Ryan's Career choice before entering politics.......... He took young boys on overnight camping trips for a living...... Let us hope none of the wee laddies snitch him out..... He does have the look of a young beady eyed Jerry Sandusky.......

(The above commenter posts as "ISPEAKFORGOD")

"Romney picks Paul Ryan for VP.

Ryan advocates the end of Medicare as we know it to be replaced with "Coupons" to use at the doctor.

He wants to Privatize Social Security and put that money in the stock market, just when you should be reducing risk.

Ryan wants to lower taxes on the wealthy, raise taxes on the middle class and poor.

His Ryan Plan has been condemned by his own Catholic Church as it relates to the poor.

Even Romney immediately distanced himself from The Ryan Plan.

Ryan is a member of the House of Representatives from Wisconsin. He has never even run in a state election and 54% of the people never heard of him.

Is this the level of expertise we want in the White House?

Romney just shot himself in the foot.

But, hey, it takes the attention away from Romney's lack of transparency and his refusal to release his tax returns.

At least for a few days.

Mitt, enjoy the weekend."

(The above must be one of my father's friends)

"It is believed that Sodomites and Muslims are the two riders of the Pale Horse of the Apocalypse: Death and Hades (Rev. 6:7-9).

Once Sodomites control the West and Muslims control the East (both near completion), these two minions of Satan will turn against each other and conflagrate the earth, bringing the Apocalypse.

Then, the righteous will be taken to their glory in the Kingdom, and the unrighteous will be “cast into the furnace of fire, where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth” (Matt. 13:42)."

(And that, my friends, is your "***headdesk***" moment of the day.)


Now over to the Palm Beach Sun-Sentinel:

"-Shades of 2008. It is almost classic how similar the situation is! A WEAK republican candidate for president of the United States is in trouble in the polls. He's sinking, and he knows that he cannot do anything about it. He needs a spark- His campaign needs a catalyst. He makes the decision to go radical- He picks an outsider with little experience but a big mouth.....
And we all know how THAT one turned out!
The moment I heard that McCain had picked Sarah Palin as VP candidate in 2008, I knew Barack Obama had won the presidency. And last night when I read that they throught that Romney[Swiss bank accounts] was going to pick Paul Ryan...I instantly knew that it was GAME OVER!
The Democrats and Barack Obama are now going to add one more MAJOR demographic to the pile that they already basically own: Senior citizens. Paul Ryan wants to GUT medicare, and all they have to do is point this out to the public. Since over 90% of seniors vote in EVERY election....this choice for VP is about 50 more nails in the Romney campaign's coffin....."

"WHAT A BEAUTIFUL IS TO RECEIVE THE ADVERTISING BY MAIL EVERY SINGLE DAY AND SEE THE BACKGROUNDS OF ALL THOSE RUNNERS FOR ELECTED POSITIONS....FROM THE LOWERS TO THE HIGHER ARE SPECIAL IN SOME WAYS,THEY SEEM TO BE EGOCENTRICS, THEY ARE THE BEST PEOPLE,THE BEST PARENTS,THE BEST FRIENDS THE BEST HUSBANDS THE BEST IN EVERYTHING,AT THE SAME TIME THEY ATTEND TO EVERY WORSHIP AND THEY ARE DOING THEIR BEST TO MAKE THIS COUNTRY THE BEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.BESIDE THEY NEVER EVER HAVE HAD ANY TROUBLE AT LAW,NO EVEN A TRAFFICS TICKET.ALL OF THEM ASSURED ME THEY ARE MY BEST FRIEND , PALS AND ALL OF THEM PROMISE MY TO DO ALL THE POSSIBLE THINGS FOR A BETTER LIVE FOR ME
NOW I AM THE MOST HAPPY AMERICAN CITIZEN COUNTING ON AL THOSE NEW FRIENDS THAT THE ONLY THING THEY ARE LOOKING FROM MY IS MY VOTE ,IT MAKES MY A VERY IMPORTANT PEOPLE.AT LEAST THEY SEND TO ME GREETINGS IN THE VOTING SEASON. I APPRECIATE IT. I THANK TO GOD BECAUSE ALL THE CANDIDATES ARE TELLING ME THE TRUE"

"Republican agenda revealed -
If the presidency is won then the plundering and pillaging of the middle class will continue. Rob from the poor to give to the rich.
If the presidency is lost then John "Boner" (Speaker of the House) will continue on his evil mission to play games and tie up congress so that nothing gets accomplished, and force the American people to vote Republican if they want things to get moving again. But it will just be back to the same old BS that got us in this mess in the first place."

"Rubio wanted to work with dems - wrong move if you are a "Tea Partier" whatever that means"

"to all of those believing that Romney paid no tax.... he I am sure is going to display all of his checks to the IRS he wrote for estimated Federal tax quarterly payments. Just to shut all the liars up. No high figure income earner goes without scrutiny by the IRS.... I am sure he took every possible deduction allowed by law. What is wrong with thst... ???Poor folks get deductions for earned income tax credit, dependents, etc. Many times the IRS actually pays low earners instead of low earners paying taxes."


How indicative this is of how Florida will go in November, I have no idea. Either seniors, near-seniors, or those who figure on living long enough to become seniors someday are dumber than I thought, or else the wingnuts are just more likely to take the internet class at the local library. The Miami Herald has some polling numbers from America's Dick and in a state where Obama should be trouncing Romney by double digits, the numbers aren't all that impressive -- yet. We'll have to see how it looks after William Saletan's orgasm is finished and Mark Halperin gets medical attention and the thrill leaves Chris Matthews' leg and the media that actual people watch start looking more closely at Ryan's actual positions.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, June 26, 2012

But of course THEIR government subsidy is deserved, unlike all those "undeserving" recipients, right?
Posted by Jill | 6:17 AM
It seems that when Willard Rmoney appeared on Face the Nation last Sunday to rail against government spending, he did so against a backdrop of a farm that gets a nice fat chunk of federal farm subsidies. What makes this interesting is that the owners of the farm see no inconsistency between their own raking in of six figures of federal cash and their insistence that the government needs to "cut spending":
Jeff and Karen Zuck, who own the 160-acre, 117-head dairy farm that was Romney’s chosen backdrop for the rare non-Fox interview, have collected $195,631 in federal subsidies since 1995. The $44,549 in grants they got in 2009, Barack Obama’s first year in office, was almost twice their previous high in 2002, and was a consequence of the heightened subsidies the Obama administration rushed to deliver as milk prices plummeted in the recession. Only 20 farms in subsidy-rich Lebanon County, Penn., received more federal aid than the Zucks in 2009, and only 30 exceeded the Zuck subsidy over the prior decade and a half. But the farm didn’t even appear on the top 50 list in George W. Bush’s final year in office, when they received a measly $1,177 in subsidies, less than three percent of what Obama gave them the next year. Regardless, Karen Zuck told The Daily Beast that she and her husband back Romney. “I haven’t liked Obama since before he was president,” said Zuck, who had a hard time pinpointing exactly what she likes about Romney, other than her belief that he’s “going to do more” about “keeping regulations down.” Acknowledging that 2009 and 2010 were their “darkest years,” Zuck admitted that “maybe we did get something from it,” a reference to the Dairy Economic Loss Assistance Program (DELAP) that Obama jump-started in 2009 ($10,243 for the Zucks), and the Milk Income Loss Contract Payment Program that Obama infused with new funding ($34,944 for the Zucks). “We get enough,” said Zuck. “But we’d rather not,” she added, insisting that she’d prefer to let milk prices rise on their own.
Yeah, right. Because these are just principled conservatives who are willing to sacrifice that nice fat check in the name of "cutting spending", right? Isn't that funny, then, that they went right ahead and cashed the checks.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, May 26, 2012

What does "running government like a business" even MEAN?
Posted by Jill | 6:37 AM
We've heard a lot over the last decade about how the federal government should be "run like a business". It's that particular meme that now has 58% of "financially struggling whites" believing that Willard Rmoney (sic) will do more to advance the economic interests of their families than Barack Obama would. How much of this is because these people believe that if they Just Work Hard Enough™ they will be allowed into the Rich Guys Club, how much of it is a residual sense among some in this group that "Democrats give everything to the lazy ni---rs" (a sentiment held by Mr. Brilliant's own father until late in his life when his frequent hospitalizations and resulting care by black nurses made him change his tune somewhat), and how much of it is buy-into this notion of "He will run government like a business, I don't know. But the notion of "government-as-business" is as ridiculous as "the federal budget should be run the way you run your own budget."

So what are some of the things businesses do these days, anyway?

Well, for one thing, the raison d'être for a business is to generate profits to be distributed to shareholders. (Note: It is NOT to generate jobs.) These shareholders might be the owners, or a small group of executives, or stockholders of publicly-held companies. Of course these days, profits of even publicly-held companies are largely distributed to a small group of executives through stock-heavy compensation plans, but I digress.

When capacity is insufficient to meet demand, businesses expand by investing in plant and equipment. Somehow, when Republicans like Mitt Rmoney talk about running the government like a business, they leave out this investment part. If government were run like a business, it SHOULD invest in roads, railroads, bridges, education, nutrition programs for children, and other things that are the government equivalent of plant and equipment. But instead, they advocate running a kind of business where your employees are still developing new applications in COBOL on IBM mainframes running DOS-VSE because you're not yet "certain" that this desktop computing thing is going to take off.

When there aren't enough employees to meet demand, companies have a couple of options. You can either hire people, or work the ones you have even harder. When all of your fellow business owners are choosing the latter, your own employees will go along with it because they can't do better anyone else. Of course after about sixty hours a week the law of diminishing returns kicks in, but at least the cost part of your ledger doesn't increase (especially if you've given your employees titles which allow them to be paid a fixed salary as exempt employees). What DO "demand and supply" mean when you run government "like a business"?

Now what happens when business slows down and you don't need as many employees as you have? You COULD cut hours temporarily. You could say that you'll pay 80% of salary for a 32-hour week. But in the US, most companies just get rid of people through layoff. If government is run like a business, what does this "laying people off" look like? Is it ending all government programs to help them and their families? Or does it mean lining them up against the wall and shooting them? What does "downsizing" or "right-sizing" government look like where its "employees" (i.e. citizens) are deemed to be superfluous?

Somewhere along the line, the Republicans forgot just who is the employer and who is the employee in our system of government. If they're going to "run government like a business", they ought to remember that. The problem is that we have a media that is all too happy to regurgitate six-word sound bites like "run government like a business" over and over and over again without explaining what that looks like.

All those financially struggling white people who think government should be run like a business should take a good, close look at Willard Rmoney's "business" career. It's one in which good-paying jobs with pensions are replaced by minimum-wage jobs without benefits -- just before the companies go into bankruptcy, but not before Mitt Romney and his Bain Capital peers shovel a bunch of money in fees into their pockets.

Rmoney likes to trot out Staples as an example of his acumen in creating jobs, even though most of Staples' growth occurred after he resigned from the company's board to run for Massachusetts governor in 1994. Here are some better examples of Mitt Romney's business record, from a Vanity Fair excerpt from The Real Romney, by Michael Kranish and Scott Helman:
Romney had come to Drexel to obtain financing for the $300 million purchase of two Texas department-store chains, Bealls and Palais Royal, to form Specialty Retailers, Inc. On September 7, 1988, two months after Bain hired Drexel to issue junk bonds to finance the deal, the S.E.C. filed a complaint against Drexel and Milken for insider trading. Romney had to decide whether to close a deal with a company ensnared in a growing clash with regulators. The old Romney might well have backed off; the newly assertive, emboldened Mitt decided to press ahead.

Romney’s deal with Drexel turned out well for both him and Bain Capital, which put $10 million into the retailer and financed most of the rest of the $300 million deal with junk bonds. The newly constituted company, later known as Stage Stores, refocused in 1989 on its small-town, small-department-store roots. Seven years later, in October 1996, the company successfully sold shares to the public at $16 a share. By the following year, the stock had climbed to a high of nearly $53, and Bain Capital and a number of its officers and directors sold a large part of their holdings. Bain made a $175 million gain by 1997. It was one of the most profitable leveraged buyouts of the era.

Romney sold at just the right time. Shares plunged in value the next year amid declining sales at the stores. The department-store company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in 2000, struggling with $600 million in debt, and a reorganized company emerged the following year. So ended the story of a deal that Romney would not be likely to cite on the campaign trail: the highly leveraged purchase, financed with junk bonds from a firm that became infamous for its financial practices, of a department-store company that had subsequently gone into bankruptcy. But on the Bain balance sheet, and on Romney’s, it was a huge win.

Not every deal worked out so well for Romney and his investors. Bain invested $4 million in a company called Handbag Holdings, which sold pocketbooks and other accessories. When a major customer stopped buying, the company failed and 200 jobs were lost. Bain invested $2.1 million in a bathroom-fixtures company called PPM and lost nearly all of it. An investment in a company called Mothercare Stores also didn’t pan out; the firm had eliminated a hundred jobs by the time Bain dumped it. Fellow Bain partner Robert White said Bain lost its $1 million and blamed “a difficult retail environment.”

In some cases, Bain Capital’s alternative strategy of buying into companies also ended in trouble. In 1993, Bain bought GST Steel, a maker of steel-wire rods, and later more than doubled its $24 million investment. The company borrowed heavily to modernize plants in Kansas City and North Carolina—and to pay out dividends to Bain. But foreign competition increased and steel prices fell. GST Steel filed for bankruptcy and shut down its money-losing Kansas City plant, throwing some 750 employees out of work. Union workers there blamed Bain, then and now, for ruining the company, upending their lives, and devastating the community.

Then, in 1994, Bain invested $27 million as part of a deal with other firms to acquire Dade International, a medical-diagnostics-equipment firm, from its parent company, Baxter International. Bain ultimately made nearly 10 times its money, getting back $230 million. But Dade wound up laying off more than 1,600 people and filed for bankruptcy protection in 2002, amid crushing debt and rising interest rates. The company, with Bain in charge, had borrowed heavily to do acquisitions, accumulating $1.6 billion in debt by 2000. The company cut benefits for some workers at the acquired firms and laid off others. When it merged with Behring Diagnostics, a German company, Dade shut down three U.S. plants. At the same time, Dade paid out $421 million to Bain Capital’s investors and investing partners.

The amount of money now being earned at Bain Capital was skyrocketing, and much of it came from a handful of giant deals. During Romney’s 15 years there, the firm invested about $260 million in its 10 top deals and reaped a nearly $3 billion return. That was about three-quarters of its overall profit on roughly 100 transactions during Romney’s tenure. In one of his most specific explanations of how he made his fortune, in his autobiography, Turnaround, Romney wrote that most of the companies he invested in were ones that “no one has heard of—TRW’s credit services, the Yellow Pages of Italy.” Those weren’t just any two deals. They were two of the most lucrative of Romney’s career, and luck played a big part in both. A mere seven weeks after buying TRW, Romney and his partners flipped the company. Bain’s $100 million investment returned at least $300 million. The second deal cited by Romney took longer but involved even more good timing and luck. It began with a renowned Italian investor named Phil Cuneo, who had the idea of buying the Italian version of the Yellow Pages. It seemed a solid investment in a firm with a staid and stable business model. But mere months after closing the deal, Cuneo and his Bain associates realized that they had acquired a company that might benefit from the surging interest in dot-com businesses; the Yellow Pages company owned a Web-based directory that had the potential to be the Italian version of America Online or Yahoo. In just under three years, in September 2000, the partners sold the investment, earning a windfall that far exceeded anyone’s initial expectations. Bain’s $51.3 million investment in the Italian Yellow Pages returned at least $1.17 billion, according to a Romney associate familiar with the deal. There is no public documentation of how the profits were distributed, but at that time at least 20 percent of the return would have gone to Bain Capital. Of that, Romney’s typical payout was then 5 to 10 percent. That means this one obscure deal would have given him a profit of $11 million to $22 million. If Romney made a side investment in the deal, as was standard among Bain partners, he would have made even larger gains. One Romney associate said Romney’s total profit could have been as much as $40 million. (A Romney spokesman did not respond to questions about the deal.)

It was those kinds of deals that enabled Bain Capital to report the highest returns in the business in the 1990s. Romney’s own net worth would grow to at least $250 million, and maybe much more, a trove that would enable him to foot a large part of the bill for his 2008 presidential campaign. Asked about a report that his wealth at one point reached as high as $1 billion, Romney said, “I’m not going to get into my net worth. No estimates whatsoever.”

I almost can't wait to see what these "financially struggling whites" are going to do when they find out exactly what Willard has in store for them.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, April 23, 2012

I think you already know the answer to that question, Mr. Krugman
Posted by Jill | 6:24 AM
Paul Krugman, NYT, today:
Just how stupid does Mitt Romney think we are? If you’ve been following his campaign from the beginning, that’s a question you have probably asked many times. But the question was raised with particular force last week, when Mr. Romney tried to make a closed drywall factory in Ohio a symbol of the Obama administration’s economic failure. It was a symbol, all right — but not in the way he intended. First of all, many reporters quickly noted a point that Mr. Romney somehow failed to mention: George W. Bush, not Barack Obama, was president when the factory in question was closed. Does the Romney campaign expect Americans to blame President Obama for his predecessor’s policy failure?
Yes, it does, and yes, it's going to work. All I have to do is walk around my own neighborhood in my little Republican-leaning town to know that it's going to work. In previous springs, you'd see contractor signs on every street, the skeletons of add-a-levels rising from what used to be the roofs of 1950's ranch and cape cod houses. This year, we see the green stains of moss on the sides of the vinyl siding that was put on the add-a-levels of years past. Down the street is a foreclosure with some kind of paper sign in the window. It used to be a cute, well-maintained cape, but finally went into foreclosure after two years in the process. I'm told that the basement was flooded during Hurricane Irene last year and the bank didn't do anything about it. Down the street is a house that had its add-a-level built only about four years ago. The "For Sale" sign now has an "under contract" addendum, because they listed it for about $150K than it would have in 2006. Speculation is that it's either a divorce or someone lost a job and they can't afford to pay the second mortgage for the add-a-level anymore.

The through streets that attract tractor-trailers looking for shortcuts to the waste facility in the next town are chewed up and not even quick asphalt tamp-down patches are being done. We have a strip mall that serves as a downtown. It's 1/3 empty, and the restaurant and two take-out places that are the only two businesses to open there in the last three years have had to resort to placing signs in front of the shopping center. And yet residents of this town are gung-ho to spend $1.8 million putting artificial turf on the sports fields, to make them the "crown jewel" of our town.

Americans got used to instant gratification during the Bush years, as they bought McMansions and turned postwar tract housing into ersatz ones. They took leases on SUVs so they could drive more vehicle than they could afford to buy and fancied themselves to be adventurers. They pulled their kids out of school in mid-year to take them on Caribbean vacations. People in towns like mine saw Louis Vuitton and the newly-plastic Coach handbags as their due. Then it all came crashing down, and someone must be blamed. And if the person to blame feeds into the sub-surface racism of this town that is still, even in this decade, 96% white, even better.

Americans have forgotten, or never quite realized, just how close we came to global economic collapse in 2008. You don't dig out of a hole that quickly. The crisis occurred just as George W. Bush was getting ready to leave office, and while the incoming administration knew things were bad, I'm not sure even they knew just how bad until they took office.

There are still millions of Americans unemployed. There are hundreds of thousands of people who have lost their homes, and more who still will. But it is better. It's infinitesimally better, but it's better. It could have been even better were it not for intransigent Republicans whose verbalized, stated agenda from January 20, 2009 has been to ensure that Barack Obama is a one-term president, and for this president's pathological insistence that he can somehow do business with such people. These are the people who have a vested interest in keeping the economy weak through the November election. And yet, almost half of Americans want to give power back to these people. They don't like the liver and onions, so they're willing to eat the pile of dogshit, just because it's something different. Yes, Mr. Krugman, the Romney campaign does expect Americans to blame President Obama. Because we live in a nation of idiots, and they will.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, April 20, 2012

Meet Mr. Romney's new BFF
Posted by Jill | 6:43 AM
For those of you who are not familiar with the Ted Nugent oeuvre, let me give you a brief introduction:

Ive got no inhibitions
So keep your keys out of your ignition
I steal a car like I got the curse
I cant resist the old lady's purse
Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know Ive got to have you in a matter of time

Well I dont care if youre just thirteen
You look too good to be true
I just know that youre probably clean
Theres one lil' thing I got do to you

Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know Ive got to have you in a matter of time

So tell your mama that Im back in town
She likes us boys when its time to get down
Shes got this craving for the underage
I just might be your mama's brand new rage

Jailbait you look so good to me
Jailbait wont you set me free
Jailbait you look fine fine fine
I know I got to have you in a matter of time

Honey you you you look so nice
Shes young shes tender
Wont you please surrender
She's so fine shes mine
All the time, all mine mine
Its all right baby
Its quite all right I asked your mama
Wait a minute officer
Dont put those handcuffs on me
Put them on her and Ill share her with you

Nice, huh? Just for the record, Ted Nugent was thirty-three years old when this song was released in 1981. Just another good Christian family-values Republican, right?

(Hell yeah, there's plenty more here.)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, April 19, 2012

And just what do these people think a Mitt Romney regime will do for them?
Posted by Jill | 5:31 AM
Sorry about no posting this week. I've been working like a fiend and I'm totally spent at the end of the day. And yes, the parade of daily fresh horrors has been kind of overwhelming. How do you write about what the right-wing vision of this country is without losing one's sanity, anyway?

I had started two posts earlier this week -- one about the Mets, the other about the Mommy Wars. But the Mets have reverted to Mets form, and the Mommy Wars are already a spent force (or so we can hope). You snooze, you lose, as they say.

But I have been paying attention, and one of the things I've been paying attention to is what Mitt Romney has been saying. It's hard to imagine that after eight years of watching the mean-spirited scion of a political family whose sense of entitlement has him thinking he hit a triple when he was born on third base, this country would be willing to endure another, greedier one with an even greater sense of entitlement and a wife who's already measuring the drapes in the East Room.

Does this guy have anything to say about what this country under Mitt Romney would look like? I'll admit that I've had only so much time to pay attention this week, but from what I've heard, Romney wants to cut HUD and the Department of education, or maybe he doesn't. He's been saying for a year that President Obama has made the recession worse, then said he didin't. He's said he'd get rid of Planned Parenthood, or maybe he wouldn't. He spouts what he thinks the base wants to hear, and then his people backtrack. His aides can't say whether he supports the Lilly Ledbetter equal pay act.

What we DO know is that he's an adherent to the Ayn Rand fantasies of Eddie Munster Paul Ryan, whose draconian plans for the economy would probably consign millions of elderly and children to an early death and dramatically change this country to provide even MORE benefit to guys like Mitt Romney -- guys who fancy themselves to be real-life Francisco D'Anconias who get to fuck real-life Dagny Taggarts (except that these guys couldn't handle a real-life Dagny Taggart, choosing instead docile helpmeets who will give them many, many heirs). I wonder how many Americans have actually thought about what a Romney/Ryan Randian utopia would look like.

It doesn't seem to matter, though, because in this nation of American Idiots, people smell a New York Prime strip steak grilling in the kitchen and their mouths are watering. But it's not quite ready yet and they're hungry. They currently have in front of them a plate of calves' liver and plate with a pile of dogshit. They've already tasted the calves' liver and they don't like the taste enough to let it ease their hunger. And they refuse to wait for the steak. So they've decided that since they didn't like the taste of the calves' liver, the dogshit MUST be an improvement ( NYT link):

A rising number of Americans see improvement in the economy, but a persistent wariness about their own financial circumstances is allowing Mitt Romney to persuade voters that he could improve their economic prospects more than President Obama, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

Even as the nation rebounds from the recession, its lingering effects are reflected in the adversities facing families. Nearly two-thirds of people are concerned about paying for their housing, the poll found, and one in five people with mortgages say they are underwater.

Four in 10 parents say they have had to alter expectations for the type of college they can afford for their children. And more than one-third of respondents said high gas prices had created serious financial hardships.

The general election match between Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney is opening with evidence that economic conditions are providing ammunition for both candidates. For Mr. Obama, there is a gradually growing perception that the general outlook is turning brighter, and for Mr. Romney, there are those individuals who still do not feel substantial improvement in their own lives.

The poll found that the two men are locked in a tight race, with each gathering 46 percent of the support. Nearly an equal number of voters say they are as confident in Mr. Romney’s ability to make the right decisions on the economy and to be commander in chief as express confidence in Mr. Obama.

As many voters thought they would do better under Mr. Romney as under Mr. Obama, but slightly more said they would do worse if the president was re-elected.

I'd love to know on what basis people are saying that they'd do better under Mitt Romney. Do they think that the guys with whom Mitt pals around -- the NASCAR team owners and the horsey set and owners of NFL teams and other guys with more money than they can spend in 100 lifetimes -- are somehow going to magically create jobs when Mitt Romney lowers their taxes yet again? Do they think that the thirty major corporations who pay no taxes, some of whom get REFUNDS BACK from the government every year, are going to magically "create jobs" out of the goodness of their hearts if their taxes are cut just a little bit more? Is this the corollary of the Just Work Hard Enough doctrine -- that if you Just Give Rich Guys enough, they'll share?

Think about the elementary school bully you knew. Picture you're in a kindergarten class with him. Now envision a cake -- a big, rich, gooey chocolate cake. With lots of butter cream flowers on it. There's plenty of cake for everyone in the class. But this bully has pulled a knife on the teacher once already, and the administration has done nothing about this kid. (Let's forget for a moment that there are schools where six-year-olds who act up are led out in handcuffs.) The teacher cuts half the cake -- the half with ALL the butter cream roses on it, and gives it to the bully. Do you honestly believe that a bully of this magnitude is going to be content with half the cake when he sees that the othr kids get even a sliver of cake? Hardly. He's going to beat the crap out of those other kids just to get the rest. Even if he vomits it all up afterwards, He. Is. Going. To. Get. All. The. Cake. Because it's his due. Because he bestrides the world like a colossus.

That bully is Mitt Romney's compatriots in the one percent. And dammit, they are going to get all that cake.

So just what do these people think Mitt Romney is going to do to make his friends decide they really do have enough cake? Do they really think the dogshit will taste better? One person quoted in in the above-excerpted article seems to think so:

“I want to give the business guy a chance,” said Craig Lemoine, 47, a Republican from Las Vegas who drives a U.P.S. truck. “No one wants to put the C.E.O. in there. Everyone thinks he’ll just make the rich people richer and the poor people poorer. “But how do you know if you don’t give him a chance?”


Lucy, Charlie Brown, football, etc.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Meanwhile, back in racist Amerikkka...
Posted by Jill | 7:06 PM
Charles Johnson waded into the fetid swamp of Fox News' comment section to see what the hatemongers are saying today about Trayvon Martin...so you don't have to.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, March 11, 2012

Should these people have disproportionate influence on our political system?
Posted by Jill | 9:21 AM
Don't we deserve better than to give people like this control over a political party, let alone a country?



This is who the Republican party has chosen to represent, to the exclusion of all others. For commentary, I'll leave it to the great Driftglass, from whom I poached this video:
This is the monster in the Conservative basement that Liberals have been sounding the alarm about for the last four decades.

This is the monster in the Conservative basement that America's leading Conservative public intellectuals have spent virtually their entire professional lives pretending did not exist.

The entire focus of the modern American Conservative Movement has been to give goon like these enough political power to completely fuck up my country.

The last time these goons were given a free hand to fuck up my country, it took over two million Union soldiers and four years of bloody civil war to convince them it was a bad idea.

Maybe someone could ask leading America's Conservative intellectuals like Andrew Sullivan, David Frum and David Brooks to quantify the level of effort it took to hold themselves, year after year, willfully ignorant of fact that these goons are the bedrock on which their Movement was built.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, February 18, 2012

**headdesk**
Posted by Jill | 7:45 PM
What can one even SAY about this:
"I’m here to save America from communism,” the former "Saturday Night Live" cast member and Tea Party activist Victoria Jackson said at the Conservative Political Action Conference last weekend in Washington. As she walked the corridors she was treated like a rock star by CPAC attendees who raised their fists to her, shook her hand and thanked her for her far-Right political activism.

"The people of California voted that they did not believe that gay marriage -- no gay marriage," she explained to HuffPost Gay Voices. "They voted that. A judge, probably gay, activist judge, overturned that. That’s what I’m talking about -- communism."

She explained further that it could lead to living in pods. "Do you know what the housing is going to be like when we all live in a pod?" she asked. "And we all take public transit? It's going to be Russia. It's going to be Cuba."

As CPAC attendees who passed by expressed their gratitude to her for, as one described it, "speaking the truth," Jackson offered her thoughts on Barack Obama: "This president was raised marxist. His parents, his grandparents, his college professors, his whole life, he’s been immersed in marxism, even his church. Jeremiah Wright did not preach Christianity. He preached black liberation theology, which is marxism disguised as religion."

And she’s not happy with the Republican field either: "Republicans and the Democrats are looking the same these days. Newt Gingrich and Mitt are socialists. I think Santorum is the only conservative."

Labels: , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, December 04, 2011

Why the right should be pointed to and laughed at -- in one sentence.
Posted by Jill | 6:03 AM
In a Pew survey last spring, 75 percent of staunch conservatives, 63 percent of libertarians, and 55 percent of so-called Main Street Republicans said there was no solid evidence of global warming.


NOW can we stop taking any of them seriously?

((source)

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, November 04, 2011

I really should leave this to the professionals.
Posted by Jill | 5:37 AM
David Brooks has become almost too easy a target, but when he comes up with an opinion of this level of idiocy, I just can't keep quiet. The only thing I can tell you is to keep your eye on Driftglass, TBogg, and John Cole today, as they are the Holy Trinity of Brooksiana.

Brooks is recognized among those who still have gray matter in their crania as being perhaps the most unfairly still employed man in America. I heard a colleague tell the other day of someone she used to work with -- a Ph.D. researcher -- who is working at a Target because there are no jobs for scientists. While visiting family in North Carolina recently, we encountered a wonderful waitress who is a veterinarian who can't find full-time work in her field, so she works part time in her field and supplements her income by waiting tables. She's back where she was in college, before spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on education. These are people whose talents are being wasted -- thrown away by a Washington establishment that is willing to throw them in the garbage in their pursuit of absolute power (Republicans) or corporate campaign cash (Democrats).

But Brooks is still getting paid to write stuff like this:
The U.S. now seems to possess a 100-year supply of natural gas, which is the cleanest of the fossil fuels. This cleaner, cheaper energy source is already replacing dirtier coal-fired plants. It could serve as the ideal bridge, Amy Jaffe of Rice University says, until renewable sources like wind and solar mature.

Already shale gas has produced more than half a million new jobs, not only in traditional areas like Texas but also in economically wounded places like western Pennsylvania and, soon, Ohio. If current trends continue, there are hundreds of thousands of new jobs to come.

Chemical companies rely heavily on natural gas, and the abundance of this new source has induced companies like Dow Chemical to invest in the U.S. rather than abroad. The French company Vallourec is building a $650 million plant in Youngstown, Ohio, to make steel tubes for the wells. States like Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York will reap billions in additional revenue. Consumers also benefit. Today, natural gas prices are less than half of what they were three years ago, lowering electricity prices. Meanwhile, America is less reliant on foreign suppliers.

All of this is tremendously good news, but, of course, nothing is that simple. The U.S. is polarized between “drill, baby, drill” conservatives, who seem suspicious of most regulation, and some environmentalists, who seem to regard fossil fuels as morally corrupt and imagine we can switch to wind and solar overnight.

The shale gas revolution challenges the coal industry, renders new nuclear plants uneconomic and changes the economics for the renewable energy companies, which are now much further from viability. So forces have gathered against shale gas, with predictable results.

The clashes between the industry and the environmentalists are now becoming brutal and totalistic, dehumanizing each side. Not-in-my-backyard activists are organizing to prevent exploration. Environmentalists and their publicists wax apocalyptic.

Like every energy source, fracking has its dangers. The process involves injecting large amounts of water and chemicals deep underground. If done right, this should not contaminate freshwater supplies, but rogue companies have screwed up and there have been instances of contamination.

The wells, which are sometimes beneath residential areas, are serviced by big trucks that damage the roads and alter the atmosphere in neighborhoods. A few sloppy companies could discredit the whole sector.

These problems are real, but not insurmountable. An exhaustive study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded, “With 20,000 shale wells drilled in the last 10 years, the environmental record of shale-gas development is for the most part a good one.” In other words, the inherent risks can be managed if there is a reasonable regulatory regime, and if the general public has a balanced and realistic sense of the costs and benefits.

"A reasonable regulatory regime"? And just where in his Republican dreamland -- the one that's going to take place next November no matter what people who are actually allowed to use a voting machine decide, is this reasonable regulatory regime going to happen? And what is a "realistic sense of the costs and benefits" when one of the costs is this:
Two small earthquakes near Blackpool in northwest England earlier this year were probably caused by hydraulic fracturing, a technique of grinding underground rocks to extract natural gas.

It’s “highly probable” that fracking, as the process is known, at the Preese Hall-1 site caused the quakes, U.K.-based shale explorer Cuadrilla Resources Ltd. said in a report published today. The geological circumstances were “rare” and the strongest possible tremor, of a magnitude of 3, wouldn’t be a risk to safety or property on the surface, it said.

Do YOU want to rely on a Republican regulatory climate in the face of this:



Look, I live in a town where my neighbors finally got their power back yesterday. I have colleagues from Connecticut who aren't expected to have their electricity back until Sunday. I understand how dependent we are on energy. But risking mass contamination of drinking water and relying on corporate executives' assessments of safety should hardly give us confidence in their assessment of long-term and short-term risks of this practice.

Fracking is being done by corporations, one of them being Halliburton. Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy? It shouldn't. These companies are about making a profit, and energy companies in particular have shown little inclination to have concerns about safety. Just like the rest of the companies that are determined to suck everything they can out of this country, then leave a polluted, smoking shell behind and find someplace else to plunder, these companies should not be trusted.

That David Brooks think they should is just another example of why no one should take him seriously.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 24, 2011

Rick Perry is starting to make George W. Bush look like Stephen Hawking by comparison
Posted by Jill | 5:57 AM
Just when you thought Rick Perry couldn't seem any dumber, he comes up with this gem in PARADE, the throwaway rag chock full of ads for cheap slippers and "Amish-made" electric heater enclosers that comes with your Sunday newspaper:

Governor, do you believe that President Barack Obama was born in the United States?
I have no reason to think otherwise.

That’s not a definitive, “Yes, I believe he”—
Well, I don’t have a definitive answer, because he’s never seen my birth certificate.

But you’ve seen his.
I don’t know. Have I?

You don’t believe what’s been released?
I don’t know. I had dinner with Donald Trump the other night.

And?That came up.

And he said?
He doesn’t think it’s real.

And you said?I don’t have any idea. It doesn’t matter. He’s the President of the United States. He’s elected. It’s a distractive issue.


Now I know that PARADE is hardly the reading of people with significant amounts of gray matter in their crania, and I know that it's taken seriously by exactly the kind of people who buy reverse mortgages from Fred Thompson on late-night TV, but for Lynn Sherr, who used to be an actual journalist, to bring up the birther issue is even more beyond the pale than for Rick Perry to leave the door open. I mean seriously, is he afraid he might lose the Orly Taitz vote?

Oh wait....never mind.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, September 05, 2011

Dear Rick Perry: God is not interested in your prayers.
Posted by Jill | 12:43 PM
As far back as 2007, I was quoting the old Jewish joke that you can find in Leo Rosten's The Joys of Yiddish, the punch line of which is "Because day after day after day, all you do is mutsche me!" On a less humorous note, Matthew 6.5 says:

And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

Funny how when Rick Perry talks about throwing up his hands and saying, "OK, God, YOU fix this mess", and holds his massive stadium prayergasms, he forgets this one passage from his precious Bible.

Well, if he's left Texas in God's hands, God is telling Rick Perry just what He thinks of Texas and about how day after day, all Perry does is mutsche him:
Dozens of wildfires continues to burn out of control across tinder-dry Texas on Monday as calls went out for off-duty firefighters around the region to report for duty.

The Texas Forest Service reported 56 separate fires on Sunday that had burned some 30,000 acres. Neighborhoods across eastern and central parts of the state were reporting widespread damage.

Authorities said the fires were propelled partly by the high winds brought by Tropical Storm Lee. A late-summer cool front brought winds of 30 to 40 mph to the region, which is already gripped by one of the worst droughts in history.

The National Weather Service said South, Central and East Texas were all under "red flag" warnings for critical fire conditions until late Sunday night.

If Irene is God's punishment for the Godless heathen homosexual socialist Jewish commie Northeast, then what of the Texas wildfires?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, August 27, 2011

So whose button will this guy be wearing, Bachmann's or Perry's?
Posted by Jill | 11:52 AM
Meet your average Republican:
A 24-year-old Oregon man — who told police that he was a “Christian warrior” — has been charged with a hate crime for allegedly firebombing a mosque last November.

Cody Crawford faces 10 to 30 years if convicted of firebombing the Salman Alfarisi Islamic Center, which is about 200 feet from his house. Although his DNA has been connected to the crime scene, Crawford has maintained that he’s “100 percent innocent.”

In an unrelated incident, Crawford had ranted to police about Muslims, according to court documents.

“You look like Obama,” he said to a McMinnville officer in December. “You are a Muslim like him. Jihad goes both ways. Christians can jihad too.”

The documents reveal that Crawford also told authorities that “only Christians could understand him, that he was a Christian warrior that they were persecuting.”

“You will never know the truth about the mosque,” he allegedly said.

The firebombing came just two days after Mohamed Osman Mohamud, who had occasionally attended the mosque, was arrested in connection with a plot to bomb a Christmas tree lighting ceremony Portland.

Mohamud’s plot was reportedly uncovered with help from the Muslim community.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Expect a massive shitstorm over this
Posted by Jill | 5:37 AM
Not that it will make a difference to the teabagger population which has already turned its back on actual science, but the Institute of Medicine has advocated that insurance companies be mandated to provide contraception coverage in the interest of having better-spaced pregnancies to foster healthier mothers and healthier babies (NYT link):
A leading medical advisory panel recommended on Tuesday that all insurers be required to cover contraceptives for women free of charge as one of several preventive services under the new health care law.

[snip]

Administration officials, who say they hope to act on the recommendations by Aug. 1, are receptive to the idea of removing cost as a barrier to birth control — a longtime goal of advocates for women’s rights and experts on women’s health.

But the recommendations immediately reignited debate over the government’s role in reproductive health. Women’s groups and medical professionals applauded the recommendations while the Roman Catholic Church raised strenuous objections.

Why does the Catholic Church get to dictate national policy? If we're grandstanding about sharia law, how about we put Papal law under the same category?
In addition to contraceptive services for women, the panel recommended that the government require health plans to cover screening to detect domestic violence; screening for H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS; and counseling and equipment to promote breastfeeding, including the free rental of breast pumps.

The panel also said all insurers should be required to cover screening for gestational diabetes in pregnant women; DNA testing for the human papillomavirus as part of cervical cancer screening; and annual preventive-care visits. Such visits could include prenatal care and preconception care, to make sure women are healthy when they become pregnant.

Defending its recommendations on contraceptive coverage, the panel said that nearly half of all pregnancies in the United States were unintended, and that about 40 percent of unintended pregnancies ended in abortion. Thus, it said, greater use of contraception would reduce the rates of unintended pregnancy, teenage pregnancy and abortion.

Gee, ya think? Of course the objections of thd denizens of wingnuttia to contraception have nothing to do with babies or life and everything to do with punishing the dirty sluts living in poverty. Check out these comments that were posted on MSNBC.com's article yesterday:
"Here is a birth controll method that will work:

•No welfare after the first child.
•No welfare after 2 years lifetime.
"

"I don't understand why birth control is a cost that needs to be covered by the government. People don't choose to get sick, you can choose to have unpredicted sex and get pregnant. I know you don't choose to get pregnant but it turns out if you don't have sex you will get pregnant 0% of the time, there isn't another medical condition that can boost that kind of prevention rate."

We already have a no-copay birth control---say NO

Maybe we shouldn't pay for welfare for people that can't adhere to simple birth control practice... see how many pregnancies happen when these girls (and guys) know that there will be no help for them in they are stupid enough to have unpredicted sex and get knocked up

And the single most idiotic comment of them all:
m of two minds about this. On the one hand, it's cheaper to pay for the birth control then for a pregnancy and/or abortion. On the other hand, I don't use birth control and see no reason why my premiums should go up to pay for everybody else's, when it's an expense they ought to be able to factor in. I think the definition of insurance is to pay for something unexpected. I have no problem with the yearly preventatives because in comparison those are lower in price and save more money in the long run.

I'll bet that last commenter has never had a blood transfusion, or a stent installed, or a coronary bypass, either. But I'll bet she's not sitting up at night grinding her teeth in rage about having to pay permiums to cover these procedures in other people.

What comes through in these comments (and the many others I haven't quoted) is the way contraception is linked with "sluttishness" ("Just say no") and the fundamental inconsistencies of wanting women who have sex to be punished by pregnancy, and at the same time have no help with said pregnancy. And it's this dichotomy, which we hear verbalized over and over again by those who profess to only be concerned with TEH BAYBEEEEZZZZZ, that shows them to less concerned with America's children than with thinking Eve wasn't punished enough for eating that apple.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, July 14, 2011

Well, Mr. Bolling, that's because you are an idiot.
Posted by Jill | 5:29 AM
Warning: Your cranium may combust at this:



Oh yes he did (1:31 in):
"We can certainly say between 2000 and 2008, I don't remember ANY terrorist attacks on U.S. soil during that period of time."

Mr. Bolling, let me refresh your memory:



Oh yes, I forgot. In Super Magic Fox News Revisionist History Collapse Time, that happened on Clinton's watch. (So did the Iraq War. And I think the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby may have as well. Super Magic Fox News Revisionist History Collapse Time works that way.)

(h/t)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Businesses I Wish I'd Started
Posted by Jill | 8:01 PM
Why can't I have an enterprising mind like this?

Your Pets Will Not Be Flagged For Removal By Jesus During the Rapture





Date: 2008-06-19, 3:59PM CDT

[snip]

FLAGGERS: Over half the United States population has legitimate concerns about what will happen to their pets after the rapture occurs. Please respect their faith and allow this service to remain posted, just as the waste removal and grooming posts remain posted. Again, over half of the US population feels that this is a concern to them. If there is a specific problem with the ad, please email me. Thank you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"No one knows when that day or hour will come. Even the angels in heaven and the Son don't know. Only the Father knows."
(Matthew 24:36)

"For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord."
(1 Thessalonians 4:15�17)


Have you ever thought about what will happen to your pets after Jesus comes back to claim the souls of the saved during the Rapture and deliver them to heaven to enjoy ever lasting life? The bible clearly teaches that only those that have accepted Jesus as their savior will enter heaven (John 14:6, Romans 3:23), and we all know that pets do not have the cognitive ability to do this, so what will happen to your beloved pets? Surely without you there, they would be stuck inside your empty house, starving to death with no one to feed them, let them out to potty, or clean their litter box. This is probably not what you envision for your pets after you are gone. This is where I come in.

I am here to offer you pet care service for after the rapture. As an atheist, I will surely still be here on this earth post rapture and would love to look after your pets for a small fee and make sure they are still well taken care of after you and your family have been raptured. You will be able to look down on them from heaven and see them being well cared for by me and living happy, healthy lives. Do not let my atheism scare you! I am a moral and loving pet owner and would never do harm to any animal.

For a small deposit of only $50, you can be assured that your pets will be well cared for from the time that you are raptured until the end of their natural life. They will get adequate amounts of food, water, and shelter as well as plenty of exercise and socialization as I would imagine there will be a lot of pets that will be abandoned by Jesus the pet hater that will need to be cared for.
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
If interested, please email me for my PayPal address (you can also send me a check if you prefer) so you can assure that your pets will be taken care of after Jesus comes to take your soul to heaven. $50 is only a small price to pay to know that while you are enjoying everlasting bliss, your pets will be cared for until their end days. Thanks and have a great day!

Please do not flag this ad. It is very serious.

Remember, folks, according to Harold Camping, there are only 11 shopping days until the Rapture. Book your pet care now!

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share