I'm sure many if not all of you have heard of Good Samaritan laws
that protect wouldbe guardian angels from being sued if they save the
life of a victim of a heart attack. I've heard stories of people who'd
actually sued their life-saving benefactors for cracking their ribs
while doing chest compressions or crimping their ascot or some such
nonsense. Good Samaritan laws were then put in place to curb the rise of
frivolous and audacious tort lawsuits so that health care givers coming
across victims are given immunity from lawsuits and in some cases even
exonerated from not offering life-saving aid.
We need such a
law, an Act of Congress, actually, one that prohibits rapacious Wall
Street behemoths from suing the federal government who'd, through us,
bailed out the biggest and quite possibly most corrupt insurance giant
in the country to the tune of $182,000,000,000. Yet this is what AIG's
executive board will vote on tomorrow morning. They're actually thinking of suing Uncle Sam
for the $25,000,000,000 they claim their shareholders lost during the
bailout that saved their asses at a time when 60% of their share price
tanked in one day over four years ago.
AIG's shareholders want to launch this
lawsuit for about half what Bill Gates' fortune is because they claim
the bailout that obviously saved the company cost them tens of billions.
Obviously, they were compensated to some degree and I seriously doubt
if any of those shareholders took a big enough hit so they had to weigh
the value of single vs double ply toilet paper. Just as obviously, they
wouldn't have gotten dog shit if We the People hadn't involuntarily
stepped in to bail out their fat, corrupt asses.
private lawsuit was already filed two years ago by the 87 year-old former
AIG chief Maurice Greenberg, who automatically wins the Henry Potter
Prize for the most rapacious and avaricious octogenerarian on earth.
Greenberg's hope is that AIG's board will tomorrow join in with his
lawsuit because their corrupt investors are owed fealty by the board of
directors. It's hard to fathom how much of that $25,000,000,000
Greenberg thinks he'll live long enough to spend but one thing remains
clear: Just when you think the federal government is filled with more
grasping, self-centered, ungrateful sociopaths than any entity on earth,
a Wall Street firm like AIG comes out of nowhere to claim their place
on the mantle.
This is the equivalent of throwing a life
preserver to a drowning man who then sues you because the guests on his
boat were detained by your act of heroism and made late for dinner at a 5
star restaurant. Obviously, this will have a chilling effect on any
other Wall St. firm that needs bailing out in the future (even though Section 6 of the TARP bailout
allows the incumbent Treasury Secretary to buy up another
$700,000,000,000 of corporate debt without any oversight). If this sets
such a precedent, the federal government will think twice before bailing
out these sociopaths. Which would be a very, very bad thing for Wall
Street, not so bad for the Main Street that would be forced to fund
So this goes out to Greenberg and the AIG board: Please, proceed, ladies and gentlemen.
Try and sue the government and see what happens next time your
corruption catches up to you and your precious shareholders. Then maybe
Congress will get smart and allow you go the way of Lehman Brothers and
Bear Stearns by relegating you to the shit hill of corporate history.