Let's get one thing straight: I never liked Chuck Hagel. I was never
impressed about him volunteering to fight in a clearly unjust war in
Southeast Asia. He's a typical right wing homophobe and Obama nominating
him to head up the Pentagon is just another wearisome sign that he will
never wean himself from the right wing douchebags that have largely
gotten us into the seemingly insoluble fix we're in. Tolerating Chuck
Hagel when he was in the Senate was like tolerating getting Hepatitis B
because it's still better than having Hepatitis C.
But, speaking as a bisexual liberal in semi-permanent exile, the Log Cabin Republicans'
sudden opposition to Hagel largely if not entirely because of
an antigay remark
he'd made almost 15 years ago (and for which he's subsequently
apologized) reveals their loathsome double standards and
conveniently-timed pro-LGBT stance. It's an inexplicable move
condemned
by even the moronic Chris Barron, the co-founder of GOProud, another
right wing gay rights group, one that was barred from last year's CPAC. They'd gone as far as to take out obviously expensive full-page ads in the
Washington Post and the
New York Times.
It ought to be mentioned, although I get the dry heaves at the thought
of even typing out his name, that Mitt Romney, the virulently anti-gay
former Governor of my state, enjoyed their endorsement. This is a guy
who sought to block gay marriage in Massachusetts both before and after
its ratification and, after avoiding them for weeks, listened to gay
rights activists with sociopathic indifference to their concerns and was
actually surprised to hear some gay couples had families. And yet the
Log Cabin Repubs thought they'd get a better deal with a typically
homophobic, Mormon psychopath than an incumbent who'd endorsed marriage
equality (albeit belatedly and only after Joe Biden painted him into a
corner). Really, now, guys?
These self-loathing morons might as well have taken out their full-page ad in the
Washington (Moonie)
Times.
When are they going to realize they will never be embraced by the
conservative establishment (such as it is) EVER? I don't recall them
ever bitching and moaning about homophobes being appointed to one post
after another during the Bush years. But a 15 year-old remark by a
former senator is now suddenly relevant? Aren't these the same right
wing lunatics who keep telling us, "It's old news", "Respect our
privacy" and "Let's turn the page"? I guess the rules change according
to the letter after the president's name.
Note to the Log
Cabin Republicans: You will NEVER be accepted in the embrace of the
homophobic GOP, even among those who have yet to come out. These are the
same people who'd barred GOProud from last year's CPAC and will surely
do so again next month. And you have many more allies among liberals
than you EVER will in conservative circles.
And it utterly
mystifies us liberals who support the equal rights for all LGBT people,
including, yes, conservatives, why you persist in hitching your wagon to
a political party that would love nothing more than to sever ties with
you. You are loathed by your political brethren, ignored by even outed
and closeted gay Republicans and as a whole, the entire conservative
movement would love nothing more than to see you consigned to the flames
of Hell once promised by Jonathan Edwards.
No one's saying
you can't hang on to your core conservative beliefs. But you need to
wean yourselves from a political party that's notoriously hostile to you
and has, at the very least, worked tirelessly and fought tooth and nail
to deny you those rights pursued in your convenient, erstwhile gay rights agenda.
And anything other than completely and permanently separating
yourselves from what's obviously a toxic political party does not make
the slightest bit of sense and makes you just as screechingly incoherent
as the GOP that loathes you as much as it does liberals and Democrats.