We won't finally get on the road back to reality until Karl Rove is
made the manager of the bargain bin at a Houston K-Mart offering .99
¢ discounted books by the likes of Sarah Palin, Brad Thor and Pam Gellar before they get sent to their publishers' shredders.
If on Super Tuesday 2012 the American public got fed up with the
Republican Party's constant lies, scandals, racism, misogyny, ignorance,
hostility and overall dysfunction and policies that are more unpopular
than an outbreak of AIDS on Fire Island, then why haven't we similarly
gotten fed up with the mainstream media and tanked subscriptions,
Nielson and Arbitron ratings?
The
return on the ongoing investments the MSM make on the likes of Karl
Rove, who had gotten it consistently wrong about 2006, 2008 and most of
all 2012 and Dick Morris, who's the anti-Nostradamus, would never fly
outside the reality bubble in which the Professional Right (or Professional Wrong, depending on your fidelity to the truth) comfortably lives and into which they wind up dragging a good percentage of us.
In the real world, a consultant with a track record as abysmal as
Rove's and Morris' would, over a period of a few years, eventually not
get contracted to provide services, especially if they invariably made
their benefactors and erstwhile employers look silly. In the real world,
if you don't do your job correctly and show a stunning lack of
ignorance in the commission of your duties, you get fired, plain and
simple.
But this is not the real
world. We live a Bizarro World in which popular incumbents and
candidates, we're told even up until hours before the polls close, will
lose to an unspecified whackjob who turns out be to less appealing and
electable than a dead gerbil.
To be
sure, not all of them are delusional. Republicans crunch poll numbers
just like the Democrats and a canny, observant pundit (such as Nate
Silver) can detect trends and see minute but telling shifts in campaign
strategies such as Mitt Romney pulling millions of dollars of ads from
Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (all states he lost) and diverting
the funds to other states in which he thought he had a chance.
But what does a candidate or incumbent do if the pollsters are wrong
such as Gallup's and Rasmussen's now-infamous pratfalls just before
Election Day? And these men and women who wear expensive business suits
on television, these stupendously accomplished and erudite experts
who've worked for presidential administrations, why they can't possibly
be wrong! They must know something we don't!
At least that's the image and the myth that the MSM advances and
everything depends upon this manufactured credibility and consensus.
Just as war profiteers and other corporations create markets that didn't
exist only to corner those markets when demand is artificially created,
so the MSM, their tin-plated pundits and the corporate sponsors they
all serve literally manufacture truth. As someone (almost indisputably
Karl Rove) once told Ron Suskind in 2004, "we create our own reality. And while you're studying that
reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new
realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out."
That may be de rigueur and uncomfortably accepted by the proletariat in presidential policy-making
in which the "actors" and "architects" are gone anywhere from one to
eight years. But it's fatal, or one would think fatal, for a mainstream
media that's around for longer than that, often decades. There was a
reason why Walter Cronkite was "the most trusted man in America", a
mantle that's never been reasonably assumed by anyone that's come along
since his retirement from CBS's main news desk over three decades ago.
Read my lips: We need to stop PR welfare. We need to stop paying
pill-popping child molester Rush Limbaugh tens of millions of dollars a
year even while his employer, Clear Channel, lays off hundreds
so they can keep covering his checks so he can lose over 130 sponsors
and squirt diarrhea at women, liberals who plainly know more than him
and minorities.
And we need to stop
parading on television so-called experts and pundits who are plainly
subverting the electoral process to exclusively benefit Republican
psychopaths who wind up getting voted out after one term. Dick Morris,
to name just one egregious example, was not only wrong about Mitt
Romney, he was very wrong, predicting that Romney would get well over 300 electoral votes (even the most slanted and hopeful polls by the likes of Rasmussen
"showed" Romney ahead of the president by one point going into Election
Day) and win by the landslide that the president won by in the
Electoral College.
But the MSM will
never learn anything and we'll see the likes of Rove and Morris back on
TV in another three or four years even as the GOP harvests another
bumper crop of delusional right wing assclowns for our collective,
condescending amusement, predicting that one of them will win the White
House and that they'll take the Senate.
Because manufacturing a neck-and-neck horse race when a landslide will
surely occur, instead, and lying to the American public in order to sell
commercial time at the highest possible rates is certainly more
important than listening to Nate Silver.
If every liberal who was unhappy with Obama had listened to you and voted third-party, Romney could have won and made people like Karl Rove look like experts regarding how to win elections.
Thank goodness very few people took your advice; most held their feelings of "moral superiority" in check and voted for the ONLY candidate who could prevent Romney from winning -- and they, thereby, left all those rightwing king-makers sucking their thumbs and looking incompetent.
You, on the other hand, didn't do anything to defeat Romney and his rightwing pals.
If enough people had taken my advice, Jill Stein would've won and we'd finally be able to move forward in this country. Frankly, I think it's disingenuous of you to cede only a certain amount of votes for third party candidates in a hypothetical election, enough to act as a spoiler for Obama. I'd think the electoral college results were clear: Romney had about as much chance of winning this election as Rush Limbaugh winning a platinum medal in women's figure skating. In my own quiet way, I was every bit as right as Nate Silver. He just showed his work with solid numbers.
And I'm also as sick and tired of having to defend my vote for Jill Stein as I am seeing so-called liberals twist themselves in logical and moral pretzels justifying their own vote for Obama in exactly the same manner as right wingers had when they "reelected" George W. Bush. Everything I've written about Obama is absolutely, incontrovertibly the God's unflyblown truth and I challenge anyone to prove me wrong. I don't do just commentary. Over the last eight years, I've also sourced and double-sourced my facts and generally do a better job of it than most of the MSM and most bloggers.
And if we cannot use our own moral judgment before casting a vote we get to use only once every 48 months, then what better compass can you offer? Political expediency? Fear? Settling? Brainless partisanship?
Sorry, my compass is a moral one and I would've been deeply ashamed of myself if I'd done this year what I had in 2008. I'm very happy with my decision in voting for Jill Stein and not for some child-killing, drone-happy, DINO corporate fuckstick like Barack Obama. And when the nightmare deepens and the neofascism really emerges (protesting near a federal building or anywhere near the4 Secret Service is already against the law), think what I've been saying since 2008 and especially what I'm saying now.
"If enough people had taken my advice, Jill Stein would've won" ? ? ?
Surely, you jest. You cannot possibly believe she had ANY chance of winning. And furthermore, none of the third-party candidacies caused even a notice in the opinions expressed after the election. Those third-party candidacies had no more chance than a (you know what) in a windstorm.
As for all the bad things Obama did (and probably will do again), I do NOT need lessons from you as I have been writing about Obama's broken promises and broken pledges for more than four years and had (during the primaries) WARNED people not to vote for him, since his record in Illinois and in the U.S. senate did NOT support what he was promising to be. I was NEVER fooled about him and am not fooled about him now.
The larger point -- and the point you seem to be unable to grasp -- is that Romney would have done ALL of those same things AND a hundred more of his own evil devising.
Get off your high horse; you just look silly.
Well, thanks for being honest, Anon. But it seems to me that you wasted your vote.
It also confirms what JP has been saying about Obama and the Dems.
True, Romney lost the election, but don't think that he and the rest of the 0.1 percent don't stand to benefit financially from Obama's second term. They already have from Obama's first term. And Clinton's two terms before that.
That shows what the Dems are about.
Neither JP nor anyone who voted third party has to apologize for anything.
Anyone who voted third party WASTED his or her vote.
Or don't you grasp that?
Your previous posts, Anon, would indicate that you know more about them than most.
Although I don't wish to see it happen, I'm afraid that you and many other Dem voters will be singing the same tune in 2016 when faced with a choice between "bad" and "even worse".