"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, October 07, 2007

John Edwards Slaps Tim Russert Silly
Posted by Jill | 11:10 PM
I hope you all got to see John Edwards on Press the Meat this morning. Tim Russert's absolute, sit-bolt-upright-at-night-screaming terror of a John Edwards nomination was palpable. He was bug-eyed, sweating with fear and practically yelling his questions -- and John Edwards was utterly unflappable.

If you didn't see it, the video is up at the show's site, here. Watch Timmeh have apoplexy as he fails utterly to trip Edwards up.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Whats Up? Whats New? Whats Happening? Maron and Seder-a-thon!!
Posted by Melina | 4:53 PM
Here in the new south of Fairfield County, we're sweltering in a heat wave, and in the half hour before the Sam Seder Show, complete with the Sammy Cam (!!) I'm looking at whats coming up this week and...yeah, its Columbus day tomorrow which is another opportunity for me to sleep late (8 AM, big-whoop) and then I can rail about how much I hate Columbus Day and all it stands for; and I don't mean Italian-American pride either. I think they should just rename the whole shebang Italian-American Day, and call it a...uh...day!
Take back your pox blankets boys...put your scurvy teeth back in your smelly head, and vamoose. I'm sure that Columbus was a brave guy, and I know that its human nature to explore, migrate, to and take over other lands...we are warlike creatures and the only way to survive is to appropriate the resources that are out there. But, do we have to celebrate it? Give the Italians a day of their own, and give it a rest...

In great news for the liberal voice, (besides that Sam is about to be on, streaming here, or...good luck finding a terrestrial signal,) Marc Maron will be guest hosting the Rachel Maddow Show on Monday and Tuesday, October 8th and 9th; then he will be appearing at Comix Friday and Saturday, October 12th and 13th; then, on Sunday the 14th, at Union Hall in Brooklyn (for a short set,) and THEN Monday at Mo' Pickin's House of Satisfaction on the lower east side of Manhattan/Ave A. For those of you who were hopeful that this might mean something in the way of the Greens/AAR suits being smart enough to offer him a show, no such luck right now....Though I'm sure that your cards and letters and email couldn't hurt.

This guy is one of the hardest working men in showbiz, and if HBO-Showtime-FX or the like, don't give him his own talk show soon, there is no justice in the world... which there actually isn't, so there you have it....a perfectly Maron equation...
For those of us on the east coast who were sorta getting used to having that guy living amongst us, lo those couple-a years, we unfortunately are not gonna get him here in person for a whole extra week before his Comix gig. He is apparently taping the Maddow show from sunny LA-LA...and the quickly evolving Marc-Sammy VodCast that is offered live HERE every Tuesday at 11 AM, EST, can be done, on Marc's end, from anywhere...but is also being taped from LA. Just refresh the page a few times if you don't see both screens. Its a great show and its going to be really fun to watch it develop.

In the embarrassment of riches department of this coming week, Sam Seder is filling in for Mike Malloy at Nova M, Monday to Friday from 9PM to midnight, EST. Its almost like the good old days....but unfortunately AAR can't see the forest OR the trees...

As if THAT wasn't enough, Elizabeth: The Golden Age is opening on Friday!

Bird News: My lil' parrotlets laid 2 eggs...and they are tiny. Think of smaller than a mini marshmallow....and my second frizzle baby is still holding on in the incubator but I'm a little worried about that one. Its also really little!...Why do birds make me happy? I don't know...but I'm holding on to whatever happiness I can get my hands on these days...


and yes...theres more...theres always more...

Cross posted at RIPCoco with pictures!

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, October 06, 2007

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time
Posted by Jill | 2:16 PM
My better nature thinks it's bad form to be happy when someone sees no way out but suicide. But in this case, I'll make an exception:

A federal prosecutor who was arrested in an Internet sex sting after he allegedly traveled to Michigan from Florida to have sex with a 5-year-old girl hanged himself in a Michigan federal prison Friday morning, Detroit television station WDIV-TV reported.

John D.R. Atchison, 53, was put on suicide watch after he used a bed sheet in an attempted suicide in September.

Detroit police confirmed Atchison's suicide death at 10:14 a.m. Friday. They have not released any details.

Atchison was a married father of three and a respected figure who coached girls' softball and basketball in a park a few blocks from his home in a well-to-do Florida beach community.

Atchison had been communicating with an undercover sheriff's detective from Macomb County, Mich., who was posing online as the fictitious girl's mother and arranged for him to have sex with the child, police said.

He was arrested carrying presents for her, including a doll and earrings, and sexual materials, officials said.

"There were no red flags. He was normal. He went to work at the courthouse Monday through Friday. It's not like he carried dolls to the ballpark," said police Lt. Rick Hawthorne, who knew Atchison for more than 10 years.


I first wrote about this piece of human excrement here.

Good riddance, asshole.

Side note: I really wish that news coverage of cases like this didn't refer to "having sex" with the child. One does not "have sex" with children. It's called rape.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Another goodie from Brave New Films
Posted by Jill | 9:58 AM
Robert Greenwald is to Rudy Giuliani as gnats are to Joba Chamberlain:





You know things are bad when Mike Huckabee is the only Republican candidate who isn't completely loathsome.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The wrong Roberts is named "Oral"
Posted by Jill | 7:59 AM
Sorry, but I just couldn't resist.

It looks like Richard Roberts, son of evangelist Oral Roberts and president of the university that bears the old man's name, is in a bit of hot water....and so is his wife:

Richard Roberts is accused of illegal involvement in a local political campaign and lavish spending at donors' expense, including numerous home remodeling projects, use of the university jet for his daughter's senior trip to the Bahamas, and a red Mercedes convertible and a Lexus SUV for his wife, Lindsay.

She is accused of dropping tens of thousands of dollars on clothes, awarding nonacademic scholarships to friends of her children and sending scores of text messages on university-issued cell phones to people described in the lawsuit as "underage males."

Richard Roberts, according to the suit, asked a professor in 2005 to use his students and university resources to aid a county commissioner's bid for Tulsa mayor. Such involvement would violate state and federal law because of the university's nonprofit status. Up to 50 students are alleged to have worked on the campaign.

The professors also said their dismissals came after they turned over to the board of regents a copy of a report documenting moral and ethical lapses on the part of Roberts and his family. The internal document was prepared by Stephanie Cantese, Richard Roberts' sister-in-law, according to the lawsuit.

An ORU student repairing Cantese's laptop discovered the document and later provided a copy to one of the professors.

It details dozens of alleged instances of misconduct. Among them:

A longtime maintenance employee was fired so that an underage male friend of Mrs. Roberts could have his position.

Mrs. Roberts — who is a member of the board of regents and is referred to as ORU's "first lady" on the university's Web site — frequently had cell-phone bills of more than $800 per month, with hundreds of text messages sent between 1 a.m. to 3 a.m. to "underage males who had been provided phones at university expense."

• The university jet was used to take one daughter and several friends on a senior trip to Orlando, Fla., and the Bahamas. The $29,411 trip was billed to the ministry as an "evangelistic function of the president."

• Mrs. Roberts spent more than $39,000 at one Chico's clothing store alone in less than a year, and had other accounts in Texas and California. She also repeatedly said, "As long as I wear it once on TV, we can charge it off." The document cites inconsistencies in clothing purchases and actual usage on TV.

• Mrs. Roberts was given a white Lexus SUV and a red Mercedes convertible by ministry donors.

• University and ministry employees are regularly summoned to the Roberts' home to do the daughters' homework.

• The university and ministry maintain a stable of horses for exclusive use by the Roberts' children.

• The Roberts' home has been remodeled 11 times in the past 14 years.

Tim Brooker, one of the professors who sued, said he fears for the university's survival if certain changes aren't made.

"All over that campus, there are signs up that say, `And God said, build me a university, build it on my authority, and build it on the Holy Spirit,'" Brooker said. "Unfortunately, ownership has shifted."


Unless you want to say that the Holy Spirit is infused with the spirit of George W. Bush and has decided that Bush's admonition to go shopping or the terrorists win is what God would want too.

As for Mrs. Roberts' pursuit of underage males, well, what would YOU do if you were married to a sanctimonious hypocrite?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Lyre, Lyre, Pantz & Fier
Do you remember the YouTube video giving annotated highlights of a seminar put on by the immigration lawyers at Cohen & Grigsby PC? The goal of the seminar was to advise employers on the legal framework in which to hire foreign workers and guide them through the PERM Green Card process. You may also remember the famous bombshell from attorney Lawrence Lebowitz, ""Our goal is clearly not to find a qualified and interested U.S. worker."

I just found a cute, but informative, link in the Comments section at Patrick Thibodeau's ComputerWorld article from October 5, 2007, "Hiring Video's Aftermath: Law Firm says Words Ill-Chosen, But Advice Proper." The folks at Job Destruction.info put together a fake website for the equally fake law firm of Lyre, Lyre, Pantz & Fier, advertising the firm's expertise in lowering your company's costs by helping you replace your expensive American employees with lower cost workers from overseas. But remember, "So hurry and get your piece of the pie before it's gone. If you don't, someone else will. "

The real beauty to this website is the link to the original footage of the now infamous Cohen & Grigsby seminar. We can now judge for ourselves as to whether the doctored-up YouTube video misrepresented the law firm's presentation or instead showed a factual representation of the highlights of the seminar.

According to the ComputerWorld article, the law firm is desperately trying to back off of their original statements by stressing the legality of their advice. I'm sure it's all perfectly legal, and Cohen & Grigsby, PC are doing an excellent job in representing both the letter and the spirit of the law. Americans need to realize that there is no fraud being committed by anyone. Stepped up enforcement of the law to eliminate "abuse" will not do any good and may even be counterproductive. Only a comprehensive overhaul of the entire Visa and Green Card processes will eliminate this current rate of job destruction for American workers.

(Cross-posted at Carrie's Nation.)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Friday, October 05, 2007

Somewhere in the Great Beyond, Steve Gilliard is laughing
Posted by Jill | 9:54 PM



A good Christian boy like Andy Pettite must have thought it was one of the seven plagues of Revelation, as a swarm of gnats took over the infield out at Jacobs Field in Cleveland. It wasn't locusts, but it might as well have been, as the swarms tormented the Yankees' much-touted rookie reliever Joba Chamberlain. No matter how much I would love to see the Yankees get swept in four games, I had to feel badly for Chamberlin. My neck was itching just watching all those gnats alight on his neck. I just hope the fans don't give him too much shit in game 3 about looking more like Nuke Laloosh out there than the Heir Apparent to Mariano's Throne.

This was the wildest eighth and ninth innings I've ever seen not played by guys in blue-and-orange hats. And in the end, Luis Vizcaino gave up the winning run to Cleveland in the 11th.

Eff the effing Yankees.

Phillies and Yankers both come home down two games to none in their division series. Sweet. I'm rooting for a Rockies/Indians World Series, myself.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Things You Shouldn't Miss
Posted by Jill | 9:28 PM
John Edwards, the Democratic candidate the mainstream media want to pretend doesn't exist, will be on Press the Meat on Sunday. Check your local listings.

What do Marc Maron and Peter Jackson have in common? Both seem to be softening their stances towards employers who done them wrong.

Entertainment Weekly reports that Bob Shaye at New Line Pictures is realizing that a Jackson-helmed The Hobbit has the potential for too many Benjamins to be ignored while Jackson realizes that he is as tied to the Tolkien oeuvre as anyone in Tolkien's own family, and the thought of Sam Raimi directing Bilbo Baggins' story is too awful to even contemplate.

And Marc Maron, who severed his ties with Air America after the Green brothers refused to pay the money owed him by the previous owners, is subbing for Rachel Maddow on Monday and Tuesday next week. The funny is back -- if even for just two days. You can stream the show at Air America's site from 6-8 PM Eastern time. And if you're in New York, plan to pop on down to Comix next weekend and watch Marc Maron rage against the Bush Administration, the Christofascist Zombie Brigade, and the horror that is life in America in the Bush years. And he might even talk about his cats.

...next Friday and Saturday night, October 12 and 13, at 8:30 and 10:45 PM. Buy tickets here.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Friday Cat Blogging
Posted by Jill | 8:02 AM
Because if Melina is blogging chickens, I'd better get back in the saddle.

This week, Maggie utterly refuses to sing for the camera:



Labels:

Bookmark and Share

The legacy of Lee Atwater: Making America safe for mean-spiritedness
Posted by Jill | 6:52 AM
The coarsened political environment that pundits decry and then perpetuate is the legacy of Republican strategist Lee Atwater, who helped Ronald Reagan implement his "I Got Mine and Fuck You" economic policies with a smile. But underneath the smiles and the geniality lay a profound sense of entitlement; that the wealthy were that way because they were simply better people than the poor. The middle class was there only to manipulate, to pull them over to the side of the wealthy with rhetoric about shining cities on a hill and false promises that if you only worked as hard as they did, you too could enter the club. This served, and continues to serve to this day, to make sure that the middle class shared their loathing of the unfortunate and allow punitive economic policy to become a reality. In the Reagan years it was welfare queens with Cadillacs. Today it's immigrants. Either way, it's manipulating people into loathing what they fear most.

The problem is that after nearly thirty years of uninterrupted Republican and DLC rule, the middle class is finally realizing that the door to the country club is padlocked. A health care system reliant on employer-provided insurance now has ever-fewer employers offering health insurance. Private insurance is prohibitively expensive, as is the COBRA coverage to which laid-off workers are entitled for eighteen months, because the latter involves the employee paying the entire premium, something one is ill-equipped to do while on unemployment compensation. My own insurance, which covers Mr. Brilliant and me, would cost us $13,000/year on COBRA. Let's not even get into the fact that for-profit insurance is about denying rather than paying for care.

Health insurance costs for working families are rising four times faster than wages, and American workers find themselves increasingly in a low-wage economy, as high-paying jobs move overseas.

But inside the beltway, American workers dealing with lower pay, fewer benefits, and spiralling health insurance costs are the new welfare queens. For those whose jobs are not in any danger of being outsourced and whose benefits are secure, that those Americans who haven't bought into the I Got Mine And Fuck You Doctrine is hysterically funny.

Paul Krugman:

Here’s what Reagan said in his famous 1964 speech “A Time for Choosing,” which made him a national political figure: “We were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry each night. Well, that was probably true. They were all on a diet.”

Today’s leading conservatives are Reagan’s heirs. If you’re poor, if you don’t have health insurance, if you’re sick — well, they don’t think it’s a serious issue. In fact, they think it’s funny.

On Wednesday, President Bush vetoed legislation that would have expanded S-chip, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, providing health insurance to an estimated 3.8 million children who would otherwise lack coverage.

In anticipation of the veto, William Kristol, the editor of The Weekly Standard, had this to say: “First of all, whenever I hear anything described as a heartless assault on our children, I tend to think it’s a good idea. I’m happy that the president’s willing to do something bad for the kids.” Heh-heh-heh.

Most conservatives are more careful than Mr. Kristol. They try to preserve the appearance that they really do care about those less fortunate than themselves. But the truth is that they aren’t bothered by the fact that almost nine million children in America lack health insurance. They don’t think it’s a problem.

“I mean, people have access to health care in America,” said Mr. Bush in July. “After all, you just go to an emergency room.”

And on the day of the veto, Mr. Bush dismissed the whole issue of uninsured children as a media myth. Referring to Medicaid spending — which fails to reach many children — he declared that “when they say, well, poor children aren’t being covered in America, if that’s what you’re hearing on your TV screens, I’m telling you there’s $35.5 billion worth of reasons not to believe that.”

It’s not just the poor who find their travails belittled and mocked. The sick receive the same treatment.

Before the last election, the actor Michael J. Fox, who suffers from Parkinson’s and has become an advocate for stem cell research that might lead to a cure, made an ad in support of Claire McCaskill, the Democratic candidate for Senator in Missouri. It was an effective ad, in part because Mr. Fox’s affliction was obvious.

And Rush Limbaugh — displaying the same style he exhibited in his recent claim that members of the military who oppose the Iraq war are “phony soldiers” and his later comparison of a wounded vet who criticized him for that remark to a suicide bomber — immediately accused Mr. Fox of faking it. “In this commercial, he is exaggerating the effects of the disease. He is moving all around and shaking. And it’s purely an act.” Heh-heh-heh.

[snip]

Mark Crispin Miller, the author of “The Bush Dyslexicon,” once made a striking observation: all of the famous Bush malapropisms — “I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family,” and so on — have involved occasions when Mr. Bush was trying to sound caring and compassionate.

By contrast, Mr. Bush is articulate and even grammatical when he talks about punishing people; that’s when he’s speaking from the heart. The only animation Mr. Bush showed during the flooding of New Orleans was when he declared “zero tolerance of people breaking the law,” even those breaking into abandoned stores in search of the food and water they weren’t getting from his administration.

What’s happening, presumably, is that modern movement conservatism attracts a certain personality type. If you identify with the downtrodden, even a little, you don’t belong. If you think ridicule is an appropriate response to other peoples’ woes, you fit right in.


William Kristol is the son of one of the founding fathers of the neoconservative movement, Irving Kristol. He went to a fancy prep school. He was able to establish The Weekly Standard with fellow neocon scion John Podhoretz with the help of family friend Rupert Murdoch. Presumably he is insured by either the Standard, Fox News, the American Enterprise Institute, or Harvard University, where he is a visiting professor. Not exactly a guy who pulled himself up by his bootstraps and pays for health insurance on the open market.

We all know about George W. Bush, and how his cowboy rancher persona is just that. His wealth is estimated in the $20 million range. He is the beneficiary of health insurance paid for by the taxpayers. He comes from a family whose matriarch made her donations for Hurricane Katrina relief contingent on the funds going to her son Neil's educational software company and said that for those dispossessed living in the Houston Astrodome:

And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them."


Both of these guys think it's funny when families can't afford what they take for granted.

This is the modern conservative movement. These are rich guys who were, as Ann Richards once said of George H.W. Bush, "born on third base and think they hit a triple." There's no sense of noblesse oblige here. The overarching philosophy of modern conservatism is "I got mine and fuck you."

And this is what they want to spread around the world.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, October 04, 2007

Not even I could make this up
Posted by Jill | 8:49 PM
I've talked a lot about how after the Christofascist Zombie Wingnut Brigade gets rid of abortion they're going after birth control in their effort to control women. But it goes beyond even that.

They want to take away your right to vote.

You heard me.

This one, from....well, who's the nuttiest wingnut you can think of...at World Nut Daily, comes to us courtesy of Dave at Seeing the Forest:

According to a recent poll of women voters commissioned by "Lifetime Television" ("Television for Women"!) women are complaining again. Over a third of the women respondents say none of the presidential candidates are addressing their concerns.

According to the summary provided by the "Lifetime Television" web page, the top concerns of half or more of the respondents are these: the "insufficient effort to cure breast cancer," gun control, medical benefits, childcare, the rising cost of a college education, the connection between pollution and health risks, violence against women, and equal pay.

Nearly three-fourths believe it is more important for the government to shore up the Social Security Ponzi scheme than to bother with those silly tax cuts.

These could only be the poll results of people who have nothing to do with the creation of wealth. They sit home waiting for their husbands to bring home the money, or toil away at little jobs dreamed up to assuage the egos of bourgeois women living in the suburbs.

[snip]

As a class, women have never borne collective responsibility for work, they have never learned how to store food for the winter, and they have not generated economic growth.


If you needed further proof that Ann Coulter is really a man, look no further. Only a man who's uncomfortable as either a man OR a woman could hate women this much.

And don't give me the usual pablum about how Ann Coulter doesn't represent conservatives. You guys on the right want to decide that one ad that some people found tasteless by Moveon.org represents all liberals AND the Democratic Party, then this lunatic harpy represents all of you.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Making terroristic threats is OK if you're a Republican too
Posted by Jill | 9:23 AM
Remember when Jesse Helms said that if Bill Clinton were to show his face in Helms' home state of North Carolina, he should watch his back? No law enforcement officials said a word about that.

You can't wear an "Impeach Bush" T-shirt on an airplane, but Rep. Darrell Issa can say this to Henry Waxman on Washington Journal:




"If Henry Waxman today wants to go to Iraq and do an investigation, Blackwater will be his support team. His protection team. Do you think he really wants to investigate directly?"


...and that's perfectly OK. No, Issa isn't threatening Waxman with bodily harm done by himself, but he is saying that Blackwater security officers might retaliate against Waxman if he goes to Iraq to investigate the company -- and he seems to think this isn't a problem.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

A Death in Toontown
Posted by Jill | 6:08 AM
Back in 2005, I wrote about dealing with the deaths of fictional characters. This was in response to the end of Six Feet Under and what looked at the time, and proved not to be the imminent demise of Wally in the Funky Winkerbean comic strip from an errant land mine in Afghanistan.

If Funky author Tom Batiuk copped out of having to blow Wally to smithereens via the most unlikely mine disarming ever, when it comes to beleagured character Lisa Crawford Moore, Batiuk let her have it with both barrels.

Lisa has been a staple in the strip for much of its run -- as a pregnant teenager in the strip's earlier incarnation who gave up her baby for adoption and finished high school. Later, after Batiuk fast-forwarded the strip, she went on to go to law school and establish a thriving practice, marry her best friend -- Funky's dorky sidekick Les, battle breast cancer successfully and produce a daughter, only to find herself with a recurrence of cancer earlier this year.

Batiuk has taken a lot of flack over the last few years for dealing with topics like alcoholism, the war in the Middle East, and Lisa's cancer. But for those of us who for some strange reason find ourselves drawn (heh) first to the "storyline" strips like Funky and For Better or Worse, the storylines are what have kept us coming back.

Early on in Lisa's cancer struggle, Batiuk took on the health care industry, writing about Les and Lisa's struggles with their HMO, "DenialCare." This time the industry was curiously absent and it was the health care delivery system that screwed up, mixing up Lisa's scans with those of another patient. This is hardly a far-fetched concept, given the news from Long Beach, NY this morning of a woman suing a medical lab for mixing up test results which resulted in her having a double mastectomy when she turned out not to have cancer at all.

Over the last few months, Batiuk, a cancer survivor himself, hasn't shrunk from presenting the devastation of cancer. He's packed the storyline with content, with Lisa testifying before Congress for more cancer research funding, finding that the son she gave up years before (who turned out to be another character in the strip), and making the decision to stop the radiation and chemotherapy that was making her feel awful and live whatever time she had left, and he hasn't shied away from presenting late-stage cancer in all its devastation. In Monday's heartbreaking strip, the cancer, now metastasized to Lisa'a brain, took her eyesight, thus ensuring that she would not, as she'd wished, see the leaves turn one more time.

Against a backdrop in which a presidential candidate's wife is also battling a recurrence of breast cancer, Lisa's storyline seems to be a slap in the face of the millions of women battling breast cancer today. But for someone in Lisa's position, with an aggressive form of cancer that has spread beyond medicine's ability to do much more than throw a bunch of chemicals at it and see if anything at least slows it down, choosing to let nature take its course rather than live a sick and miserable few weeks longer, can be just as courageous a decision as the one to keep fighting a futile battle. My point is that everyone with cancer is different, their cancers are different, and Lisa's choice is not about "giving up" but about choosing how you want to make the cancer journey.

Today, Batiuk finally and mercifully ends Lisa's struggle after wisely choosing to end the graphic depiction of end-stage cancer. He shows Lisa'a death as taking place in a kind of halfway point between life and death, in which the cancer patient sees herself as she was when she was healthy in a netherworld with no context and no background, as if it were some kind of demented Duck Amuck sequel. But rather than prolong the reader's agony by showing us Les and daughter Summer's long grieving process, he's going to flash-forward the strip ten years, beginning on Sunday, October 21st.

During this compelling storyline, which had readers scratching their heads about how much they were grieving the imminent demise of a person who isn't even played by an actor, and isn't even three-dimensional, one anonymous blogger has provided such a community in which Funky fans can read the strips along with snarky commentary (which has grown markedly less snarky as Lisa's disease has progressed), so if you don't read the strip and want to follow the storyline, you still can. One ingenious Funky fan has dealt with the strange emotion of grieving for a pen-and-ink character by imagining the strip as a show in which the characters are portrayed by actors with the same names. Because one needs to laugh even in the face of tragedy, I was able to obtain permission from the author (who, alas, has no site to link to and wishes to be identified only as "Ash") to reprint in its entiretythis seriously funny "interview" with "Lisa Crawford", who plays Lisa in the strip:

When reality gets a bit too heavy for me to deal with, in this case for example, I always end up thinking about the death of Bill the Cat. If you are not familiar with Bloom County, there was a particular episode that dealt with Bills death. Obviously, everything was screwball and comedy, since frankly I was never quite sure if Bill fit the definition of alive. Anyway, there is a part where various comic strip characters are being interviewed about the life and death of Bill. I believe in one panel, Charlie Brown, in silhouette, talks about Bill drinking all his root beer and trashing his Hollywood bungalow.

I see Lisa Crawford, who plays the character Lisa Crawford Moore on the comic strip Funky Winkerbean sitting down and doing an interview about her departure from Funky Winkerbean.

Lisa, thanks for taking the time to speak with us today.

Lisa: You are so welcome. I'm happy to be interviewed.

Lisa, you have been a character in Funky Winkerbean (FW) for decades. We saw your character grow from an awkward teenager to a successful lawyer, marrying your best friend and having a child with him. How do you feel about your departure from FW?

Lisa: Wow, there are just so many emotions going through my head right now. Obviously sadness and loss is the primary emotion I'm feeling. I have loved working on FW. I practically grew up on the set of FW. I am personally close to most of the cast and I hope to see them regularly after this.

I'm also partially happy. I think it's time I move on. I have had offers to appear in other strips. I may have a small part on For Better or Worse, as a predatory home wrecker, trying to break up Michael's marriage. I still do not know if I will take the part, but it would be a challenge.

More importantly, I'm going to go home and eat and eat and eat. I had to lose 45lbs this last 6 months! I need to gain back 20lbs (laughter).

Was the idea of killing of your character, strictly Tom Batiuk's (TB) idea, or did you have any input?

Lisa: Well, I have a small ranch in Texas that I spend the winters at. In fact, my neighbor is Thomas Haden Church. That man should have his OWN strip, let me tell you! Anyway, I was out riding horseback when I see Tom pull up to the fence. I'm thinking, what the hell is Tom doing out here?? This was down time for all of us on the strip.

I ride to the fence gate, let Tom in, he gets out of his rented car and tells me he has made an important decision and he and I have to talk.

Tom and I have always had our differences. I do believe I have slapped him on at least two occasions, with little regret on my part. But I love Tom, both professionally and personally. He told me what he had planed for my character. I slapped him for the third occasion.

Tom and I spent two of the most heart wrenching two days working out what would happen to Lisa. I made peace with Tom and understood where he was going with the character. I didn't quite like it, but I understood.

I also made peace with my character Lisa last winter too. There is a small grave on a hill on the ranch, under an old mesquite tree that represents my time on FW. The grave has a maternity dress I wore during the whole teen pregnancy episode, a Robin costume I wore when I married Les, a pink ribbon I got during breast cancer awareness month walkathon and a whole bunch of mud from my tears.

You and Les Moore have had a professional and personal relationship for years. You both seemed like the perfect couple. What happened and where are you two now?

Lisa: Boy, where to star with that? Les and I have been friends from day one. I have always adored Les as a friend. I believe it all started to change some time in the late 80's. In fact, I know the precise moment and it involved Tina Yothers. About two weeks before, that said "moment" Les and I were at a party in New York. I think we were helping Tom sell one of his books and we had appeared on the Today show. Anyway, Les and I get invited to this glitzy party for a movie premier, I don't even remember which. Being in the comic strip industry and being invited to a movie premier is a big deal. In the entertainment world, we are slightly ahead of Soap Opera celebrity. Slightly more famous, less cash. Them's the breaks. Anyway, while we were there, Les got the idea that he is going to go introduce himself to Winnona Ryder. He offers her a drink and introduces himself. She offers him a $40 tip, thinking he is a polite waiter. Oh the wretched look on Les's face. I felt so bad for him that night. It wasn't like Les is Brad DeGroot from Luann. That's another story which needs a shot of tequila to tell. I grabbed Les by the arm before he embarrassed himself even further and explained that we had an even bigger party we needed to attend. He and I spent the rest of the night at some coffee house in Greenwich talking and laughing and I was thinking Winnona really lost out that night.

Fast forward two weeks and who do I see Les with on the set? That's right, Tina Yothers from Family Ties. I don't know the full story, but an episode of Family Ties was going to involve Tina stuck up a rope in gym and Les was going to make a guest appearance, stuck up another rope, right by her. Lazy writers at the time, I guess. I didn't know that feelings for Les I had, had grown to the extent I was feeling at that moment. I was fuming. I was absolutely f***ing livid. I was about as angry and jealous as I think I have ever been. I wanted to take a fresh, steaming hot Montoni pepperoni pizza and smash it right in Tina's face.

You know, you spend a lot of time with someone, you sometimes don't recognize feelings that sneak up on you. I really thought I thought of Les as a brother, honestly. A good friend, a buddy even. But more than that? If you would have told me I would end up falling for Les, I would have told you that was about as likely as Charles Schultz writing in that Charlie Brown actually kicks the football from Lucy and then goes and actually kicks Lucy's ass.

A year passed and as many of my fans know, Les and I ended up getting married and we have two wonderful children together. Reality sat in about 5 years down the road and unlike the comics, Les and I changed and it was not in a way that made us grow closer. Towards the end of our marriage, things got so ugly, I almost had to quit the strip. I really pushed Tom into writing that difficult time into the strip. You know, Les falls for one of his students. Gets arrested. Thrown in jail, beaten and only occasionally seen in the comic. Tom didn't go for it, said it could be a good plot line, but it would be hard to bring in any comedy in it. Comedy. Cancer? Sure. Les's character getting busted with jail-bait and thrown into state prison, not so much. It was just the anger in me talking, but still. Gets me worked up just talking about it.

The rumors about Funky and me are just that, rumors. It didn't take anyone else to come between us, we did that all on our own. Les and I came to an understanding. I had to come to realization that I could not change Les, and Les could not change who me. Les will always be, in my opinion, much like his comic strip character; a great listener and a good friend with a good heart and of course, a bit of a dork. Unlike his comic character, Les has almost no ability to commit to a relationship. I truly believe that Les would shrivel up and die if there were no women for him to seduce on an almost monthly basis. Myself? I had no desire to put up with it. Les was and is a great friend and a fantastic father. He unfortunately, made a lousy husband. Having children together, we managed to work things out as far as being friends with each other. Sometimes, he even listens to the fairly good advice I give him. Sometimes I think he should accidentally get shoved into one of the pizza ovens in the comic strip.

We know about your relationship with Les, how about your relationship with the other cast members?

Lisa: As I mentioned, I'm fairly close to most of the cast, especially the ones that have been there for a while. I have a home in Ohio, where the main set is and I do believe that almost everyone in FW has come over on several occasions. Funky and Holly come over to the ranch quite often, actually.

Is there any particular cast member you have or had a rocky relationship with?

Lisa: Other than Les? No, not really. I sometimes was a bit distant with Mr. Dinkle and to this day, I still call him Mr. Dinkle. It may not seem like it, but he is just so intense. So focused. So in character at all times. I learned so much of my craft from him, but never got to know him on anything other than a professional level.

Lisa, I want to clarify a rumor for us. Did you and Cindy ever have a lesbian affair?

Lisa:(nervous laughter) OH my! Where did that rumor come from?

It's been an urban legend for years and is quite a popular item to speculate about on the internet.

Lisa: (laughter) The internet. Of course. It's a series of tubes!

Well, I can say, I did have a wild side when I was younger. The whole teen pregnancy thing was actually not that far off from really happening. Cindy however?

Well, I'll end this rumor right now. No lesbian affair.

(giggling) But we made out on at least two occasions! We were teenagers and peppermint schnapps does strange things to me. Cindy was and is a hottie, can you blame me?

In 1992, Tom had you all age by 10 years, how did you all manage that?

Lisa: Well, the same way this upcoming jump will be handled. Lots and lots of make up. In 1992 it was such a relief to stop playing a teenager. I had to stoop to make myself look smaller and had to wear this girdle that made me have a figure only slightly more busty and curvy than a teenage boy. It was a nightmare. Most of us had had enough at that point. Tom may have said it was his idea, but frankly, most of the "teenagers" almost walked off for good.

How do you feel about the next 10 year jump, with your departure from FW?

Lisa: Well, I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned, but I will be in a few strips, mostly as flash backs and on video. Everyone else will just need to spend a little bit more time with make up and prosthetics here and there.

Also, a lot of the kids currently on the strip are being, well fired. I mean, in a way, it's a good thing. Growing up as a 6 year old, your entire life on a comic strip is too much. Look at what happened to those Family Circus kids. I mean, each one is in their 50's and they have to be digitally altered to still fit the strip. How many times has Billy been arrested for his "child" like behavior outside the strip? I'm sure there is only so much a judge is going to put up with and roaming around the neighborhood, jumping on peoples cars, walking through their houses and messing with their property may be cute for a 7 year old, but not a crazed 52 year old.

Autumn, who plays my daughter Summer is just a sweetie. Wise beyond her years. She actually will be on the ranch next year as I really have grown to think of her as a daughter.

The young lady that will be the new teenage Summer has already been hired. Apparently she was going to be in a new Spider-Girl strip, as the teenage daughter of Peter and Mary Jane Parker, but that didn't work out.

As far as character development? Who knows. I don't really know where Tom will be taking some of these characters. I heard that Wally Winkerbean does not have a contract yet, so maybe Tom still has some thinning of the heard to do. (points her finger in the shape of a pistol at a picture of Wally and her on her wall)

Is there anything you would like to say to FW fans before to end the interview?

Lisa: I would just like to thank them all for their support. I have seen the final strip with my character already. It's hard to watch yourself in a strip like that. The whole time, I was thinking of all the memories I have about FW. The laughter, the tears, the depression, the absolute joy. Those memories just came swelling back and it hit me like a real death would.

I think it's important to remember, that FW, like life has a whole grab bag of events that happen to the characters. We may not like the sadness, but it helps define laughter. We may not like the ugliness that sometimes life offers up, but it makes the beauty in life, that much more beautiful.

Lisa was a character in a comic strip called Funky Winkerbean. She loved and laughed. She cried and even hated, just like all of us. She was a geek who feel in love with another geek and that love was everlasting, as corny as that may sound. She had a child that no mother could love any more strongly. She died on her terms against an impossible fight. Yet, she lives on...every time you see Summer. Every time you think of her as a pregnant teenager trying to figure things out. Every time you think of her and Les being married on Halloween as Batman and Robin. Every time you think of her fighting and winning against breast cancer. Every time you think of her, Lisa is very much alive. It is your own comic strip in your own mind, it is your story of Lisa that matters. If you don't close the page on her memory, she will never be gone.

Lisa, thank you again for letting us interview you.

Lisa: It was my pleasure. And just to let you know, I'm going to have a book out by summer. Tentatively titled "Confessions of a Comic Strip Starlet: The Lisa Crawford Biography". I have several publishers who want the rights, but I have not picked one yet. Keep a look for it on Amazon.com and my subsequent tour to promote the book!


"Ash" isn't the only one who's gone meta on Lisa's story. The University Hospitals Ireland Cancer Center in Cleveland, Ohio, has set up "Lisa's Legacy Fund". Lisa's Story: The Other Shoe has just been published by Kent State University Press.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Who killed Ciara Durkin?
Posted by Jill | 7:21 PM
A young lesbian joins the Army National Guard. She is sent to Afghanistan in a desk job working with financial information. While on home leave, she says to her family, "If something happens to me in Afghanistan, don't let it go without an investigation." A month later she is found dead behind a building on Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, with a single bullet wound to the head. The military tells her family first that she died in combat, then changes their story to the death being attributable to "non-combat-related injuries."

Her sister later reveals that during that home leave, Ciara Durkin expressed concern that she had "seen things that she didn’t like and she had raised concerns that had annoyed some people."

The family has not received autopsy results. They have requested an independent autopsy, but the military has not responsed to their request. The military has refused to make Durkin's paperwork available so the family can determine her wishes as to her funeral.

Massachusetts Sens. John Kerry and Edward M. Kennedy have been in touch with Defense Secretary Robert Gates to try to get to the bottom of the case.

We all remember Pat Tillman, who also was said to have been killed by enemy fire and it turned out he was fragged by his own guys. Ciara Durkin was on a secure base and found dead with a single bullet wound to the head as if shot execution-style. Was Durkin killed because she was gay? And if not, what did she find out in the financial information that crossed her desk that someone in the military decided should never see the light of day?

Stay tuned.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Sometimes the hypocrisy just takes your breath away
Posted by Jill | 12:35 PM
George W. Bush, two days ago, in a White House Proclamation in honor of Child Health Day:

Our Nation is committed to the health and well-being of our youth. On Child Health Day, we reaffirm our commitment to helping children develop good nutrition habits and active lifestyles, so that they can grow into healthy and productive adults.

[snip]

On this day it is also appropriate to recognize the important role the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) has played in helping poor children stay healthy . To preserve that role and ensure that poor children can get the coverage they need, SCHIP should be reauthorized.

The Congress, by a joint resolution approved May 18, 1928, as amended (36 U.S.C. 105), has called for the designation of the first Monday in October as "Child Health Day" and has requested the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this day.


George W. Bush today, in his veto of SCHIP:

I am returning herewith without my approval H.R. 976, the "Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007," because this legislation would move health care in this country in the wrong direction.

[snip]


This bill would shift SCHIP away from its original purpose and turn it into a program that would cover children from some families of four earning almost $83,000 a year. In addition, under this bill, government coverage would displace private health insurance for many children. If this bill were enacted, one out of every three children moving onto government coverage would be moving from private coverage.


I'd say it's unbelievable, but it's all too believable for this president. As usual, we have a Republican claiming that all that is not forbidden is mandatory. I don't buy for a minute that those with private insurance already are going to rush their kids into a government program.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Liar!
Posted by Melina | 10:31 AM
The "water carrier" Limbaugh is weakly protesting his disgusting comments, meant to shut down discourse by our soldiers, and what is he doing on Armed Forces radio anyway?
As much as I don't like the tit for tat senate time waste of debating this crap, I think that we should all speak out against the brand of hate speech that Rush Limbaugh is the daddy of.
Like Dave Johnson, I too am shocked and awed at how deftly the neocon talking heads have managed to twist this thing into a Rush-as-victim scenario, all the fuckin' way up to and including the NY Times!
As Brad says this morning, the NY Times Petraeus ad wouldn't have even be seen by many people outside of NYC if not for the Right's screaming protest at the entity that put the ad up. Of course, in a fight that is really about MoveOn having balls enough to raise some money and run and ad, and Rush having the constant platform of a national radio show that spews venom at everyone who doesn't agree with him, AND which is broadcast on Armed Forces Radio, when we know that they are not exactly getting fair and balanced, much less equal coverage of both sides of the debate in America, there is no comparison.
This is not tit for tat, its about 2 groups using their free speech on their own audience, but one is much more far reaching and reaches, in fact, to the captive audience of the people that he is telling to shut up.
And what can we say about a guy like Rush who use their own free speech to try to shut others down? I don't know. Its an insidious problem that he can even get the ratings to stay on the air when he wont honestly talk to opposing side or do anything that is not carefully controlled from his cocoon.
This is something that I like about the Sam Seders and Marc Marons of the world; they welcome conservative voices because they want to try to understand them and argue with them too. Its such better radio when you have an honest debate as opposed to a producer screening your calls to make sure that only certain types of callers get through.
The thing is that when the conservative callers call in to Sam's show, (Marc is currently on the air in a new video-cast with Sam that is live on Tuesdays at 11AM EST here,)their knowledge seems to consist of the very line of crap spewed by the likes of Rush and O'Reilly, and their brethren....and the logic, information, lies, and pressure points are often what we see in the White House daily briefing room and via the "talking points" that we know are sent out to certain conservative operatives to make sure that they are all on the same message. My question has always been, what are they so freakin' afraid of? If they are right about all of this, then what is the problem with some upstarts who have different ideas? isn't that what this country was founded on anyway? If Rush and his ilk were actually as patriotic as they claim to be, they would welcome dissent and other voices. As it is
How did the media world get to be so one sided?...Oh yeah...the fairness doctrine used to make it sort of lawful to present both sides...and not so much in separate shows and on other networks either...
I'm tired of Rush Limbaugh in his locked world telling everyone to do as he says and not as he does. I think that from what is going on in the republican party, its clear that the underbelly of that line is usually pretty sordid. And, when in doubt, its safe to say, that the gentleman doth protesteth too much.
So who is the victim here? The soldiers who have to rely on limited news sources and who might feel cowed into not speaking their minds...and us...the American public should not have to spend a minute on this crap. But apparently we do in order to remind everyone that there are two sides out there, and that THEY are not controlling the information anymore.

RIPCoco

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

"People... Do Stupid Things Sometimes."
There’s an old saying that when one is faced with two diametrically-opposed versions of a story, the truth is usually to be found somewhere in the middle. Unless, of course, one side is stuck to by a Republican, holy-roller psychopath such as Blackwater USA founder and chairman Eric Prince.

In his testimony to Congress yesterday, Prince denied that his latter-day gunslingers acted inappropriately when they went berserk and killed 17 Iraqis and wounding two dozen more in a firefight in Baghdad last September 16th. Here’s an example of how appropriately Prince’s fine mercenaries conducted themselves:

A man was driving toward Nisour Sq. when a bullet crashed through his windshield. Instantly killed, the man’s foot stayed on the accelerator, giving Blackwater goons another opportunity to shoot the car, killing the driver’s mother as she was cradling her son and screaming.

At least one Blackwater helicopter appeared out of nowhere and strafed the cars from above, even the ones that were trying to flee the scene. Despite bullet holes being found in the roofs of several cars, Eric Prince had the audacity to deny that Blackwater helicopters were ever used.

  • Fleeing Iraqis were shot in the back.

  • A boy was killed.

  • Only the Blackwater murderers were armed.

  • One Blackwater mercenary had to train his gun on his own colleagues and shout at them to stop firing.

    These are but some of the facts as we know them after an exhaustive investigation by the Iraqi national police who had interviewed a dozen Iraqis and one American. Yet the best Eric Prince could come up with by way of an explanation before Congress yesterday was a sociopathic, "We have 1,000 guys out in the field. People make mistakes, they do stupid things sometimes."

    No, lighting the wrong end of a cigarette is stupid. Putting the toothpaste on the wrong side of your toothbrush is stupid. Shooting up a busy public square when a bomb goes off, killing civilians who are trying to flee, getting air support to strafe the cars and doing this without being shot at once isn’t stupid: It’s psychotic.

    Casually dismissing the deaths of those 17 innocents and rationalizing the wounding of 24 others as mere “mistakes”, as if it’s a mere management failure on a par with not Fed-Exing a package in time is something one would expect of a sociopath. I wish to God someone in Congress had told Prince that.

    Henry Waxman said, “Privatizing is working exceptionally well for Blackwater. The question for this hearing is whether outsourcing to Blackwater is a good deal to the American taxpayer.” But Waxman’s obviously missing the bigger, more important point, which is how good a deal Blackwater is to the countless Iraqi men, woman and children murdered by them over the years.

    Naturally, the problems involving life and death, too, was quickly drawn along party lines, as vividly exemplified by North Carolina Congressman Patrick McHenry (God, I hope he’s not your congressman, Susan) who spoon-fed Prince this talking point: “Your client is the State Department. The State Department has a contract with you to provide protective service for their visitors. And you’ve had zero individuals under your care and protection killed.”

    Not a word, you’ll note, about the women and babies killed by Prince’s Blackwater thugs, including the ones killed on the September 16th shootout in question. And even more forgotten was the fact that we’re primarily there, say the Powers That Be, to safeguard and liberate the Iraqis, not state department officials, from cruelty.

    But let's not forget the more important issue here, folks: No American state department officials have died on your watch. Plenty of Iraqis, sure, but no American fatalities, so that's what we should be concerned with, here. Translation: American lives are vastly more important than Iraqi lives.

    Yet Blackwater is still in Iraq, on the taxpayer dole, murdering innocents, men, women and children, in your good name, with your hard-earned money, while their boss cooly denies to Congress that anything inappropriate happened.

    Iraq has become a massive live-action video game, with a sociopathic monster like Eric D. Prince holding the master control.
  • Bookmark and Share

    Sure if "loyal American" means using civilians for target practice
    Posted by Jill | 6:40 AM
    Blackwater's Christofascist Zombie CEO, Erik Prince, has one redeeming quality that sets him apart from most corporate executives: he's loyal to his own employees. But despite the facts that a) the company received a no-bid contract and overbilled the government; there were not one but two civilian shooting incidents involving Blackwater personnel on September 16, and the company's personnel have been involved in almost 200 civilian shootings since 2005, not only has the government given Blackwater a nice shiny new contract, Prince defends his employees, saying “People make mistakes; they do stupid things sometimes.”

    This is like stabbing someone on the back and saying "Shit happens." "Shit happens" is when a tree falls on your house, and "People do stupid things sometimes" is drinking too much or using a chain saw on a ladder when you've never used one before, not a consistent pattern of using civilians for target practice.

    Erik Prince is the Brownie of privatized Iraqi security: greedy, ignorant, connected, and completely out of touch with reality:

    Mr. Prince, who comes from a wealthy and prominent Republican family in Michigan, said his company’s phenomenal rise came from competence, not connections. He said he had not personally lobbied the White House or Congress to get federal contracts.

    Asked if his sister-in-law, Betsy DeVos, a major Bush fund-raiser, former Michigan Republican Party chairwoman and wife of the party’s 2006 nominee for governor, had interceded on Blackwater’s behalf, he smiled and shook his head. “No,” he said.

    The company had less than $1 million of federal government contracts in 2001. Last year, the company took in nearly $600 million in federal money, most of it under contract with the State Department to provide bodyguards for diplomats and visiting dignitaries, including the dozens of members of Congress who travel to Iraq each year.

    [snip]

    Mr. Prince said he was proud of his employees, who have conducted thousands of escort missions in the most dangerous parts of central Iraq without death or serious injury to any of the people they are assigned to protect. Thirty Blackwater workers have been killed in Iraq, he said.

    He said Blackwater guards strictly followed rules of engagement set by the State Department, which call for gradual escalation of force before any shots are fired.

    The House committee staff found that Blackwater employees had fired their weapons 195 times since early 2005 and in a vast majority of incidents used their weapons before taking any hostile fire. The report also said that in most cases Blackwater guards fired from fast-moving vehicles and immediately fled the scene of any confrontation.


    On Monday, Pam posted about the kind of shining Americans Blackwater hires. But if you think that this is the kind of person needed in a war zone, don't forget that Blackwater thugs were deployed in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 -- presumably because the Louisiana National Guard was too busy being fed into a meat grinder in Iraq. And the company has opened "training centers" in Illinois (to the chagrin of local residents) and California (to the chagrin of local residents).

    Does anyone actually think these guys will behave any differently as the neocons' Praetorian Guard than they do in Iraq?

    Labels: ,

    Bookmark and Share
    Tuesday, October 02, 2007

    Around the Blogroll and Elsewhere
    Posted by Jill | 9:52 PM
    Because there's a lot of good stuff you should read:

    From the "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" file, Eli at Firedoglake lays out the case that Hillary Clinton favors war with Iran.

    Cernig is waiting for a Senate resolution comdemning The American Conservative for calling Gen. David Petraeus a sycophant.

    We live in one hell of a misogynistic society, folks. Kate fills us in on how the American Male's favorite radio duo, Opie and Anthony, think rape is hilarious. That these two assholes get paid, even by XM rather than terrestrial radio, while the brilliant and funny and GROWN-UP Marc Maron and Sam Seder are Andy Hardying their way into a regular subscription webcast, is a fucking crime.

    Marisacat has a good compendium of information about Burma.

    Yes, he DID refer to "phony soldiers." And it's time to take Rush Limbaugh off of Armed Forces Radio. Sign Wesley Clark's petition to fire his anal cysted ass.

    Chiron Boy on Billo: Because anyone who works nadsat slang into a blog title deserves your support.

    Bitch Ph.D. gives her Pseudonymous Kid a life lesson, accompanied by an awesome video from Dove, a company from whom I'm determined to buy more and more body wash, because I don't give a shit what they're selling, someone who puts together their ads at least, Gets It. And I hope someone reading this is in a position to thank them.

    Clammyc doesn't buy Rahm Emmanuel's horsepuckey about Waiting for Godot To Be Elected President as a Democrat either.

    Bill Scher on how Bush's promotion of freedom in the world and support of pro-democracy movements is strangely selective -- and mostly talk.

    And finally, from the "I'm Going To Go Stick An Icepick In My Own Forehead Now" file, Dave at Seeing the Forest has another shining example of Your Liberal Media At Work.

    Labels:

    Bookmark and Share

    America the Bush Fiefdom
    Posted by Jill | 9:27 PM
    As far back as 1988, I was saying that the Bush family regards the entire country as a fiefdom for their family and friends to enrich themselves. I was right all along. Take a gander at this little tidbit:

    Turns out Joseph Schmitz, COO & general counsel of the Prince Group, Blackwater's parent company, is married to one Lucila Garnica Gallo, Colomba Bush's sister (Jeb Bush's wife).


    More about Joseph Schmitz here.

    Labels: , ,

    Bookmark and Share

    Digby
    Posted by Jill | 3:18 PM
    Bookmark and Share

    If they won't do the people's bidding, the people need to vote them out
    Posted by Jill | 6:47 AM
    We already know who the Republicans in Congress represent, and it isn't the majority of the American people. But whom do the Democrats represent? Methinks it's not the American people either.

    In the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, Captain Codpiece is sitting with a 33% approval rating and only 27% of Americans (presumably the hardest-core kool-aid drinkers who wouldn't let go of the George Bush is Jesus notion even if he were caught sodomizing and exterminating small children and enjoying them with fava beans and a nice chianti) favor full funding of the Iraq occupation. 55% of Americans want Congressional Democrats to more forcefully challenge Bush's Iraq policies. Only about a quarter want Congress to fully fund Bush's latest request for an additional $190 billion for the war.

    So what do the Democrats do? Authorize another $150 billion in funding. The vote: 92-3.

    The three who voted against the funding? Robert Byrd (D-VA), Tom Coburn, of all people (R-OK), and the always reliable Russ Feingold (D-WI)

    Weaseling out of the vote entirely, and therefore unworthy of being taken seriously the next time they get up on a podium and talk about ending the war:

    Hillary Clinton
    Barack Obama
    Chris Dodd
    Joe Biden
    John McCain

    Last Friday night on Real Time with Bill Maher, Rahm Emmanuel all but said that if the war isn't funded, George W. Bush will leave the troops in Iraq without it (about six minutes into this video segment:






    Maher: So why don't you just not bring up a finding bill? You're the only ones who can bring up the bill. Why don't you just do that?

    Emmanuel: Well, if the question is why don't we just not bring up the funding, first of all, that's not the way to get the kids out of there. Bill, that might sound good and be a good sound bite, but the fact is...I have constituents there. Let me tell you what's part of this. OK? And this is a very tough call for a lot of members of Congress; at least the number of us who oppose this war. $48 billion of the recent request is for the best humvee now to protect kids. We made .. a real argument when this war started that we had kids go over there with no kevlar vests; parents were buying their own kevlar vests for the United States Army. Humvees that were not protected. These are the best humvees. You have constituents over there, their kids are over there, they're serving....

    Maher: [starts to interrupt]

    Emmanuel: No, wait a second. Do you not get that humvee there that can save a life?

    [Audience member shouts out; pandemonium]

    Emmanuel: No, wait a second. I'm all for bringing 'em home. You know how you bring 'em home? We need a new president because this president will not [unintelligible].


    So what Emmanuel is saying is that the funding is to provide better protection for the troops because if we don't, their commander-in-chief will leave them there indefinitely without it. When he says that what we need is a new president, he all but seals the deal.

    So if in fact the truth is that House and Senate Democrats know, or even fear, that this sociopath of a president is so tied to his Iraq policy that he will allow 130,000 Americans to be sitting ducks without food, clothing, or armor, unless his war is funded, then let them come out and say so. If this president has essentially kidnapped his own military and is holding them hostage to his narcissism -- funding or no funding, then Democrats in Congress have an OBLIGATION to let the American people know that this is what the President of the United States is doing.

    Labels: , ,

    Bookmark and Share

    Enron has risen from the grave
    Posted by Jill | 6:03 AM
    Well, not literally. But if you thought corporate governance was back in style after the Enron debacle and trials, guess again.

    If you watch cable TV at night, you already know that despite the mortgage mess, Countrywide is still advertising refinance loans with the ferocity of 2005. On Sunday the New York Times business section ran an article on how Countrywide's ruthless business practices are forcing people from their homes. Today Paul Krugman explains how Countrywide's CEO largely cashed out right before the company began to go south:

    You can’t especially single out Countrywide for the failure of investors to realize how much risk they were taking on — that’s a failure with many fathers, including everyone from Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, which were far too free with their AAA ratings, to Alan Greenspan, who assured us that while there might be a bit of “froth,” there was no national housing bubble.

    But Countrywide made more questionable loans than anyone else — and its postbubble behavior does stand out. As Ms. Morgenson reported in yesterday’s Times, Countrywide seems peculiarly unwilling to work out deals that might let borrowers hold on to their homes — even when such a deal, by avoiding the costs of foreclosure, would actually work to the benefit of both sides.

    Why block mutually beneficial deals? As the article points out, Countrywide can make money from the fees it charges on foreclosures, while the losses from mortgages that could have been saved, but weren’t, are borne by others.

    Last but not least, since it may be the key to the whole story, is the victimization of Countrywide’s own stockholders.

    Last year Mr. Mozilo’s huge compensation drew a protest from a group of shareholders including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Pension Plan. But the worst was yet to come.

    In late 2006, even as Countrywide began using shareholders’ money to buy back its own stock at more than $40 a share — it’s now worth only $19 — Mr. Mozilo was selling. Between November 2006 and August 2007 — that is, during the months before investors fully realized the extent to which his company would be hurt by the subprime mortgage crisis — he unloaded $138 million worth of Countrywide’s stock.

    Again, unless the stock sales lead to insider-trading charges, there’s nothing in this story that involves illegality. Still, how can it be that so soon after Enron, WorldCom and other scandals rocked the business world, we’re once again hearing about executives cashing in just before their companies are revealed as less successful than advertised? The answer, of course, is that we never dealt properly with those scandals.


    If like me, you're the kind of homeowner who did the research and read the fine print, refused to succumb to the siren song of mortgage companies telling you that you qualified for a far bigger loan than you were asking to take, did the calculations and only bought what you could afford on a monthly basis even in the event of a temporary financial setback, and bought at the bottom of the market, it may be difficult to sympathize with people who ought to have known that you can't afford a $600,000 house on a $40,000 salary, no matter what the mortgage company is telling you. But in this country, the yearning for homeownership is strong, and as prices skyrocketed from 2000 to 2005, it's equally difficult to blame homebuyers for wanting to believe the man on the other side of the desk (or on the other side of the internet) who said that by taking a option interest-only ARM, you could actually afford that house of which you've dreamt for so long. After all, most of us don't do the math, don't read the fine print, and often don't understand everything about what we're signing -- and aren't encouraged to. After all, the people who handle the transaction are the experts, right? Why not believe them; they know more than we do, right?

    So once again, we have the privatization of reward and the socialization of risk, with executives at best skirting the edges of legality and plunging right into the Pool of Corporate Scumbaggery™, with working- and middle-class Americans as the collateral damage.

    I wonder how long it's going to take Americans to realize that Corporations Are Not Your Friend.

    (UPDATED to correct Krugman link.)

    Labels: , , , ,

    Bookmark and Share
    Monday, October 01, 2007

    The disappeared
    Posted by Jill | 7:19 PM
    We all now know that the ever-changing rationale for the Iraq war has now settled on a loose hybrid of the "establishing democracy" rationale and the "liberating the
    Iraq people from a tyrant" rationale.

    Now we're hearing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad being elevated in status to that of "the new Hitler", and the Administration is gearing up for "regime change" in Iran.

    Funny how the only tyrants the Bush Administration cares about are in countries awash with petroleum.

    In Darfur, the genocide and violence has been going on for years, with over 200,000 dead and over a million homeless at the hands of the Janjaweed and their backers in the Sudanese government. And the U.S. sits by, giving lip service to sanctions and disapproval. Last Saturday ten African Union peacekeepers were massacred at their camp. And a State Department spokesman calls for sanctions.

    Today we found out that the rebellion in Burma has been squelched through mass killing of those who opposed the ruling regime, with thousands dead, including hundred of Buddhist monks executed. And again what we hear from the U.S. is a call for sanctions.

    I'm not saying the U.S. should get involved militarily in every country's conflict. But with the Iraq occupation now being painted by the Administration as, depending on the day, a humanitarian mission to implement democracy and rebuild the country we shattered, or a fight to the death against terrorists; and George Bush's stubborn clinging to the notion that it was necessary to depose the tyrant ruling Iraq, the fact that we leave people in countries not awash in oil to fend for themselves makes the American president's view of himself as the architect of freedom everywhere in the world seem to be just a wee bit disingenuous.

    Labels:

    Bookmark and Share

    Blogger Guilt Trips
    Posted by Jill | 7:14 AM
    At some point in every blogger's life, someone is going to ask you why you do it. For some bloggers, particularly the proprietors of the larger blogs, it's a career. They make a living (such as it is) from advertising, or donations, or other revenue streams. Those are the lucky ones who, because they aren't sitting at a desk in an office building someplace, can cover all the important stories. For the rest of us, we have to pick and choose. And what we pick and choose depends on why we blog.

    Like most political bloggers, I also dream of blogging being a second career (especially since my first career is so dependent on grant funding and my skill set tends to be ignored in anyone over the age of 40). But since at this point, that's a dream, I can't aspire to the kind of comprehensive coverage of every story that some other bloggers do. And because B@B is primarily a political blog, but also has elements of "Whatever The Hell I Feel Like Writing", sometimes there are Big Stories that I don't cover.

    Another aspect of Big Stories is that they require a fair amount of analysis and understanding -- and sometimes we just don't have enough time during the hour in the morning we have free to read the news, look at other blogs, and try to write something coherent, to get every important story.

    For a "serious" blogger, there are two big stories which warrant more coverage and which I admit to having neglected, and those are the Jena 6 case and the demonstrations in Burma/Myanmar. Pam has castigated the white blogger community for being missing in action on the Jena 6 story, and Jon Swift smacks down the progressive blogger community for falling down on the Myanmar story.

    On these I plead guilty on both counts. It's logical that these stories would have warranted some attention here, certainly as much as the Mets' collapse, or musings on whether New Jersey's dependence on the pharmaceutical industry makes it the Michigan of tomorrow, or a cute ad from Honda. But one of the problems my co-bloggers have had is in determining what fits and what doesn't, because my tendency is to Potter Stewart the question: I can't define it, but I know it when I see it. Certainly an uprising involving Buddhist monks and one of the ugliest racial cases in this country in recent years should have warranted some attention here. But I'll be honest about why I haven't covered these: because I came into the story right in the middle.

    When I sit down to write in the morning, I'm not a newspaper editor considering what the most newsworthy stories of the day might be. When I started this blog three years ago, it was for two reasons: one was because if I didn't find another outlet for my ranting, I was going to drive Mr. Brilliant out of his mind; and the other was to call the attention of family and friends to stories that I thought they might miss elsewhere, stories I thought were important.

    I have a friend who doesn't follow politics. She is aware that things are very wrong in this country and she worries about her children's and grandchild's future, but doesn't get involved in politics. Last week she forwarded me a variation on the "Don't buy Petro Express gasoline because they're selling Citgo products and Citgo is owned by Hugo Chavez who hates our military, hates our president, and hates America. e-mail. I'm not sure why she does this; she knows I don't go for this kind of jingoistic crap. I'm not convinced she reads them before she sends them. She's one of the reasons I write.

    There is certainly an argument to be made that both the Jena 6 case and the Burmese conflict warrant more attention than they've been given in the blogosphere. But I'm not sure that laying guilt trips on bloggers who haven't given them the attention they deserve is going to accomplish anything. None of us can cover everything. If there's a story you think I should cover, e-mail me -- especially if it's a story you've been covering in-depth. I'd be happy to link to your coverage. It makes a lot more sense to do that than do a half-assed job that re-invents the wheel and doesn't inform as well as someone who's put the time and effort into covering a story in depth. The notion of "blogwhoring" is viewed with much disfavor in Blogtopia (™ Skippy), but doesn't it make sense to not only promote your work, but ensure that the news you feel is important gets seen by more people?

    Labels:

    Bookmark and Share