"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, January 13, 2013

Hounded to death?
Posted by Jill | 12:25 PM


We are so numbed to death these days that sometimes it seems the only time human loss affects us if it's either someone in our immediate circle, or the mass slaughter of innocents.

Perhaps it's a function of still being emotionally raw after having spent most of the holiday season going through old photographs and throwing away hundreds of photographs of my mother's entire life over the years from 1972 to 2000, keeping only the best photographs and representative photos of her various and sundry dogs. But reading yesterday of the suicide of Aaron Swartz at the age of twenty-six just knocked me flat.

It isn't that I knew Aaron Swartz personally. In fact, I had no idea who he was until I started seeing the above photograph everywhere I looked; a photograph that at one time my mother would have showed me and said, "See? Now someone like THAT would be a nice boy for you." But part of what I've been going through while looking at the documentation of my mother's life is seeing photographs of her in her teens and early twenties, and then thinking about the wreckage she made of herself, of her second marriage and her life after her husband's passing, and wanting to take that girl from the late 1940's and knock some sense into her. And after reading who Aaron Swartz was, I want to smack him across the face too and say, "SCHMUCK!! You're a fucking genius! How DARE you take that mind away from this world!

For my fellow unitiated, here's who Aaron Swartz was, from Cory Doctorow over at BoingBoing:

I met Aaron when he was 14 or 15. He was working on XML stuff (he co-wrote the RSS specification when he was 14) and came to San Francisco often, and would stay with Lisa Rein, a friend of mine who was also an XML person and who took care of him and assured his parents he had adult supervision. In so many ways, he was an adult, even then, with a kind of intense, fast intellect that really made me feel like he was part and parcel of the Internet society, like he belonged in the place where your thoughts are what matter, and not who you are or how old you are.

[snip]

Aaron had powerful, deeply felt ideals, but he was also always an impressionable young man, someone who often found himself moved by new passions. He always seemed somehow in search of mentors, and none of those mentors ever seemed to match the impossible standards he held them (and himself) to.

This was cause for real pain and distress for Aaron, and it was the root of his really unfortunate pattern of making high-profile, public denunciations of his friends and mentors. And it's a testament to Aaron's intellect, heart, and friendship that he was always forgiven for this. Many of us "grown ups" in Aaron's life have, over the years, sat down to talk about this, and about our protective feelings for him, and to check in with one another and make sure that no one was too stung by Aaron's disappointment in us. I think we all knew that, whatever the disappointment that Aaron expressed about us, it also reflected a disappointment in himself and the world.

Aaron accomplished some incredible things in his life. He was one of the early builders of Reddit (someone always turns up to point out that he was technically not a co-founder, but he was close enough as makes no damn), got bought by Wired/Conde Nast, engineered his own dismissal and got cashed out, and then became a full-time, uncompromising, reckless and delightful shit-disturber.


There's more, from one of the people actually qualified to write about this young man.

But in case the utter waste of a fine mind doesn't make you angry enough, go read about how the Federal government had decided that because he broke into MIT and used his laptop to release hundreds of subscription-firewall scientific documents, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

I'm no advocate for lawbreaking or piracy or anything else. I used to use BugMeNot.com to get around subscription firewalls like most people did, until I was laid off in 2008 and deluded myself for about five minutes that I should actually get paid for writing and realized the inconsistency of trying to get around revenue streams. But ten felony counts? Seriously? While Jamie Dimon, Vikram Pandit, Angelo Mozilio, and Lloyd Blankfein walk free? A kid in his early twenties is an adherent to the "Information wants to be free" movement and you want to put him in prison for fifty years while the men who architected a global near-economic-collapse are free to do the same shit again? And this wasn't under George W. Bush's Total Information Awareness Big Brotherism; this is Barack Obama's and Eric Holder's Justice Department that did this, and in the course of doing so, arguably hounded a twenty-six-year-old genius to death.

And they say they want this country to be more educated.

Labels:

4 comments
Bookmark and Share
Friday, January 28, 2011

The Kill Switch
Posted by Bob | 11:53 PM
Who says it can't happen here?
Egypt Flips Internet Kill Switch. Will the U.S.? by Dan Costa, PC Magazine

The legislation was first introduced last summer by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), and the former has promised to bring it to the floor again in 2011. It isn't called anything as obvious as the Internet Kill Switch, of course. It is called the "Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act." Who could be against that? Anyone who's watching the news on TV today, that's who.

The proposal calls for the Department of Homeland Security to establish and maintain a list of systems or assets that constitute critical cyber-infrastructure. The President would be able to be able to control those systems. He or she would have ability to turn them off. The kicker: none of this would be subject to judicial review. This is just a proposal, mind you, but it certainly warrants concern. Particularly given the heavy-handed example being provided by Egypt.

Reports of Egypt's grand disconnection came first from James Cowie of Renesys, a New Hampshire-based firm that tracks Internet Traffic. As he watched Egypt drop off the grid, Cowie wrote:

"Every Egyptian provider, every business, bank, Internet cafe, website, school, embassy, and government office that relied on the big four Egyptian ISPs for their Internet connectivity is now cut off from the rest of the world."

Keeping citizens off the Internet is becoming standard operating procedure during civil unrest. The Iranian government slowed Internet access to a crawl during last year's civil unrest, but the country online. Myanmar has a little more success blocking its citizens. Egypt's move, however, is unprecedented in its scope.

Labels: , ,

0 comments
Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, October 03, 2007

Who killed Ciara Durkin?
Posted by Jill | 7:21 PM
A young lesbian joins the Army National Guard. She is sent to Afghanistan in a desk job working with financial information. While on home leave, she says to her family, "If something happens to me in Afghanistan, don't let it go without an investigation." A month later she is found dead behind a building on Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan, with a single bullet wound to the head. The military tells her family first that she died in combat, then changes their story to the death being attributable to "non-combat-related injuries."

Her sister later reveals that during that home leave, Ciara Durkin expressed concern that she had "seen things that she didn’t like and she had raised concerns that had annoyed some people."

The family has not received autopsy results. They have requested an independent autopsy, but the military has not responsed to their request. The military has refused to make Durkin's paperwork available so the family can determine her wishes as to her funeral.

Massachusetts Sens. John Kerry and Edward M. Kennedy have been in touch with Defense Secretary Robert Gates to try to get to the bottom of the case.

We all remember Pat Tillman, who also was said to have been killed by enemy fire and it turned out he was fragged by his own guys. Ciara Durkin was on a secure base and found dead with a single bullet wound to the head as if shot execution-style. Was Durkin killed because she was gay? And if not, what did she find out in the financial information that crossed her desk that someone in the military decided should never see the light of day?

Stay tuned.

Labels: , ,

1 comments
Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, September 18, 2007

The Manchurian Candidate
Posted by Anonymous | 7:42 AM

Jonathan Demme’s ill-timed adaptation of The Manchurian Candidate didn't do too well when it was originally released. Armed with vision, intellect, chutzpah and a well-earned paranoia, Demme created a scary, tough-minded movie that paid respect to the original while having a strong identity of its own. Unfortunately, audiences didn't like the film. The Manchurian Candidate had a soft opening weekend, so-so reviews, and it was ignored until it went away.

It's too bad, because I believe Demme's film was damned good and that it has even more relevance now than it did then.

The Manchurian Candidate is the mean, crazy old grandfather of the Big Secret Conspiracy That Controls Everything genre. Whether it’s films like The Parallax View or episodes of 24, Alias, and The X-Files, you can see the fingerprints of John Frankenheimer’s brilliant movie. But in spite of walking down a very familiar and well-used road, Demme never stumbles into the potholes of being too derivative, too cynical or too dumb. He’s smart enough to keep what works in Frankenheimer’s masterpiece and has the confidence to throw away what doesn’t.

For example, the simplistic psychobabble that mesmerized audiences in 1962 would come across like Brainwashing for Dummies today, so it was junked. Denzel Washington and Liev Schreiber are much better actors than Frank Sinatra and Lawrence Harvey were, so there’s a tragic poignancy to their characters that wasn’t there before. Meryl Streep has a cool, elegant malevolence as Mrs. Shaw, a charming psychopath who would lovingly tuck a napkin underneath your chin to catch the blood before neatly cutting your throat. No, Streep won’t scare the bejeezus out of you like Angela Lansbury did, but she’s damned close. (There's a brilliant sequence in the film where Streep's Mrs. Shaw bullies a room full of cynical pols into giving her son the presidential nomination without even breaking a sweat) More importantly, the doomed soldiers in The Manchurian Candidate aren't bloodless figures as flat as an Army recruitment poster. What happens to them is heartbreaking.

And with a new McDonalds opening up in downtown Beijing, the villains obviously aren’t those dirty commie rats from China this time. Instead, the bad guys are a mysterious global organization named the Manchurian Corporation. As Walt Kelly’s Pogo famously observed (but, as usual, nobody paid any attention to him), “We have met the enemy and he is us.”

Jonathan Demme hasn’t “stolen” The Manchurian Candidate from John Frankenheimer. However, this version carries a deeper emotional resonance for me because the characters living in this world feel more real. Hell, the world in this remake feels more real, because as cynical as Frankenheimer's film was, it wasn't cynical enough. Back then, I don't think the original film could have imagined Haliburton, or a treacherous government that ruthlessly exploits its people because it's good business. It's not "Us" vs. "Them" anymore.

It's "Us" vs. "Us".

Labels: , ,

0 comments
Bookmark and Share