"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, April 18, 2009

If the wingnuts want to pearl-clutch over something to do with veterans, how about they start with this
Posted by Jill | 1:00 PM
There is a house in my town that has had a sign in its front window dedicated to a family member who is a Marine in Iraq. I've been seeing that sign every day for over a year, and every time I saw it, I found myself hoping for this family's sake that "Caleb" gets home in one piece. And so it was the other day when I saw said house festooned with balloons and banners, joyfully announcing to all and sundry that "Caleb" is home, that I felt a kind of joy out of all proportion to my connection with this family, which is to say none. I don't know these people, but I was so happy their loved one is finally home and safe.

It is in this context that I sat down to write this morning about the disgusting spectacle of Joe Scarborough screeching the other day, and the other lunatics who followed, about how DARE Janet Napolitano impugn the patriotism of Our Military Heroes™. But it was 6 AM, I had only one cup of Angry Chef Happy Coffee under my belt, and I didn't know quite what to write. It's the curse of the hobby blogger -- there's so little time to construct a coherent entry about hot-button subjects like whether soldiers who have been abused by the Bush Administration in the form of repeated stop-loss orders, victimized by electrocution and tainted water at the hands of Dick Cheney's cronies, being nickel and dimed on pay raises -- need I go on? -- and now coming home into an economy decimated also at the hands of their former commander-in-chief just might make them a bit angry -- and therefore susceptible to recruitment by groups of angry wingnuts looking for scapegoats.

This doesn't mean that all returning soldiers are lining up to join up with secessionists and those threatening violence against the President and Congress -- sentiments that have suddenly become regarded on the right as "patriotic" by the same people who, as Gail Collins noted today, recently had their Underoos in a twist over whether a guy whose middle name was Hussein and who didn't always wear a flag pin was sufficiently in love with his country to lead it:
Have you ever noticed that the states where anti-tax sentiment is strongest are frequently the same states that get way more back from the federal government than they send in? Alaska gets $1.84 for every tax dollar it sends to Washington, which is a rate of return even Bernard Madoff never pretended to achieve. Yet there they were in Ketchikan waving “Taxed Enough Already!” signs and demanding an end to federal spending.

Also, have you noticed how places that pride themselves on being superpatriotic seem to have the most people who want to abandon the country entirely and set up shop on their own?

[snip]

And what about my country, right or wrong? Weren’t there complaints, some from Texan quarters, during the last election that Barack Obama seemed insufficiently up front about his love of country? Isn’t threatening to dissolve the union over the stimulus package a little less American than failure to wear a flag pin?

Remember the time when Michelle Obama said, in a moment she spent an entire campaign trying to take back, that 2008 was the first time she could remember ever feeling really proud of her country? Can you imagine how the conservative base would have reacted if she said that it was the first time she didn’t feel like renouncing her citizenship?

And how, by the way, can you stand at a rally waving the American flag while yelling “Secede”? It’s like an employer handing out “worker of the week” certificates to employees who just learned that he was moving the plant to Mexico.


But as Charles Blow also wrote in the New York Times today, the numbers don't lie when it comes to these attempts at recruitment by the same wingnut groups who didn't give a rat's ass about the Constitution, or even about taxation, when it was Republicans spending their children into oblivion on wars without justification and funnelling billions of dollars into their campaign contributors' pockets:
Their argument seeks to suppress and subjugate two rather unfortunate facts: while only a tiny number of conservatives and veterans are members of hate groups, nearly all hate groups do indeed follow far-right ideology. And they covet members with military experience.

A report issued last summer by former President Bush’s F.B.I. entitled “White Supremacist Recruitment of Military Personnel since 9/11” said that “military experience is found throughout the white supremacist extremist movement” and that these groups “have attempted to increase their recruitment of current and former U.S. military personnel.”

So, which soldiers are most vulnerable? According to the Homeland Security report, it would probably be those “facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities.” This could be a large group because far too many soldiers come back from war broken men. According to a RAND study released on Friday, 300,000 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan reported some sign of post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression. It said that only about half of those will seek help and only half of those seeking it will receive “minimally adequate” treatment.

These soldiers could prove fertile ground for men hoping to prey on their fear, loneliness and dispossession.

And those extremist leaders may be able to connect more easily with some of these soldiers because many were soldiers themselves. According to the F.B.I. report, “although individuals with military backgrounds constitute a small percentage of white supremacist extremists, they frequently occupy leadership roles.”

Because many know firsthand the value of military experience, they not only recruit those leaving the military, they send recruits into it. According to Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center, “Many white supremacists over the years have pushed their followers to join the military and enter either the special forces, where the training is judged to be the best in the world, or the infantry, where you will learn the skills necessary to fight the coming race war.”

The only debate we should be having is about the best way to protect our newest veterans from falling prey to this handful of military apostates.


A-friggin-men. And of course it is things like free college for veterans, about which Barack Obama spoke during the campaign, which could help alleviate such fears of alienation, as well as prevent the Fox Newsification of returning veterans in danger of becoming like the intellect-challenged teabagger interviewed on CNN whose answer to "How is Barack Obama a fascist?" was "He just is."

But if Joe Scarborough wants to get outraged at something having to do with veterans, he might start here:
Three patients exposed to contaminated medical equipment at Veterans Affairs hospitals have tested positive for HIV, the agency said Friday. Initial tests show one patient each from VA medical facilities in Murfreesboro, Tenn.; Augusta, Ga.; and Miami has the virus that causes AIDS, according to a VA statement.

The three cases included one positive HIV test reported earlier this month, but the VA didn't identify the facility involved at the time.

The patients are among more than 10,000 getting tested because they were treated with endoscopic equipment that wasn't properly sterilized and exposed them to other people's body fluids.

Vietnam veteran Samuel Mendes, 60, said he was surprised to learn of an HIV case linked to the Miami facility, where he had a colonoscopy. He was told he wasn't among those at risk.

"I was hoping and expecting to not get anyone contaminated like that," he said. "It's probably a little worse than we thought."

The VA also said there have been six positive tests for the hepatitis B virus and 19 positive tests for hepatitis C at the three locations.

There's no way to prove patients were exposed to the viruses at its facilities, the agency said.

"These are not necessarily linked to any endoscopy issues and the evaluation continues," the statement said.

The VA has said it does not yet know if veterans treated with the same kind of equipment at its other 150 hospitals may have been exposed to the same mistake before the department had a nationwide safety training campaign.


And in case Joe Scarborough and the other looneytune fucklewits who were standing outside like the Twinings version of Minnie Pearl on Wednesday are thinking that this is a case of Black President Is Deliberately Infecting Our Military Heroes With HIV, they might consider actually reading the article, which states that this has been going on FOR FIVE FUCKING YEARS. Yes, for five years, VA staff were not being trained properly in simple medical sanitary practices, and as a result, veterans, some of them from George W. Bush's wars, have been infected with HIV. It is only NOW that we have a President who regards these guys as something other than expendable cannon fodder, that something is being done about it.

So all you teabaggers and ignorant morons out there, you bloodsuckers from states that get MY tax money (since I live in a state that gets 47 cents back for every dollar we put into the Federal government) which is why your state and local taxes are lower, if you want to get up in arms about something, and if you want to show you care about returning soldiers, how about supporting expenditure for veterans benefits? And you know what pays for those? TAX DOLLARS.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Barack Obama on how you do not support the troops by denying them opportunities at home
Posted by Jill | 6:08 AM
Speech on veterans' affairs in West Virginia yesterday:





"The young men and women who choose to serve are defending the very rights and freedoms that allow Americans to speak out against government actions we oppose. They deserve our admiration, respect and enduring gratitude.

"At the same time, we must never forget that honoring this service and upholding these ideals requires more than saluting our veterans as they march by on Veterans Day or Memorial Day. It requires marching with them for the care and benefits they have earned It requires standing shoulder-to-shoulder with our veterans and their families after the guns fall silent and the cameras are turned off. At a time when we’re facing the largest homecoming since the Second World War, the true test of our patriotism is whether we will serve our returning heroes as well as they’ve served us.

"We know that over the last eight years, we’ve already fallen short of meeting this test. We all learned about the deplorable conditions that were discovered at places like Fort Bragg and Walter Reed. We’ve all walked by a veteran whose home is now a cardboard box on a street corner in the richest nation on Earth. We’ve all heard about what it’s like to navigate the broken bureaucracy of the VA – the impossibly long lines, or the repeated calls for help that get you nothing more than an answering machine. Just a few weeks ago, an 89-year-old World War II veteran from South Carolina told his family, “No matter what I apply for at the VA, they turn me down.” The next day, he walked outside of an Outpatient Clinic in Greenville and took his own life.

"How can we let this happen? How is that acceptable in the United States of America? The answer is, it’s not. It’s an outrage. And it’s a betrayal – a betrayal – of the ideals that we ask our troops to risk their lives for.

[snip]

"There is no reason we shouldn’t pass the 21st Century GI Bill that is being debated in Congress right now. It was introduced by my friend Senator Jim Webb, a Marine who served as Navy Secretary under President Ronald Reagan.. His plan has widespread support from Republicans and Democrats. It would provide every returning veteran with a real chance to afford a college education, and it would not harm retention.

"I have great respect for John McCain’s service to this country and I know he loves it dearly and honors those who serve. But he is one of the few Senators of either party who oppose this bill because he thinks it’s too generous. I couldn’t disagree more. At a time when the skyrocketing cost of tuition is pricing thousands of Americans out of a college education, we should be doing everything we can to give the men and women who have risked their lives for this country the chance to pursue the American Dream.

"The brave Americans who fight today believe deeply in this country. And no matter how many you meet, or how many stories of heroism you hear, every encounter reminds that they are truly special. That through their service, they are living out the ideals that stir so many of us as Americas – pride, duty, and sacrifice."


My father was able to go to graduate school because of the G.I. Bill. My late father-in-law, who fought in the Battle of the Bulge, was able to buy a house because of the G.I. Bill. My generation grew up in a land of prosperity because people like my father, who grew up poor in the Bronx, or my father-in-law, who grew up poor in Jersey City, were thanked by their country for their service. The very politicians who are still trying to punish people who advocate for peace, or when peace isn't possible, war as a last resort instead of a first, oppose a new G.I. Bill because it's "too generous." John McCain, that most cynical of cynical politicians, thinks if you offer too many ways to say "Thank you for your service", the military will have retention issues instead of a bunch of kids who keep re-upping because they have nowhere else to go and nothing else to do. To John McCain, a military stocked with young men and women whose future in parts of America where the job base has long since been sent overseas so that corporate executives can get ever-bigger compensation packages looks bleak is a docile military full of kids that won't complain when asked to be deployed three, four, five, six, even seven times -- or until they're killed, whichever comes first.

John McCain can't have it both ways. He can't pose as the Ultimate Supporter of the Troops (when in reality he seems to believe it's All About Him and HIS experience as a POW, rather than the reality today's troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are enduring) and want to cut them off at the knees when they return home. John McCain seems to believe that the presidency is his Just Reward for having endured five years in a Hanoi prison. Only this kind of narcissism, a narcissism on a par with that of George W. Bush, would make a veteran, someone who KNOWS how difficult active combat duty is, decide that a comprehensive package of veterans' benefits is "too generous."

UPDATE: Paul Reickhoff has more.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, April 05, 2007

The human toll of the Iraq war that we don't see
Posted by Jill | 6:53 AM
I can't even express how my heart hurts that after not learning the lessons of Vietnam, we are going to have yet another damaged generation of young men:


Blinded and disabled on the 54th day of the war in Iraq, Sam Ross returned home to a rousing parade that outdid anything this small, depressed Appalachian town had ever seen. “Sam’s parade put Dunbar on the map,” his grandfather said.

That was then.

Now Mr. Ross, 24, faces charges of attempted homicide, assault and arson in the burning of a family trailer in February. Nobody in the trailer was hurt, but Mr. Ross fought the assistant fire chief who reported to the scene, and later threatened a state trooper with his prosthetic leg, which was taken away from him, according to the police.

The police locked up Mr. Ross in the Fayette County prison. In his cell, he tried to hang himself with a sheet. After he was cut down, Mr. Ross was committed to a state psychiatric hospital, where, he said in a recent interview there, he is finally getting — and accepting — the help he needs, having spiraled downward in the years since the welcoming fanfare faded.

“I came home a hero, and now I’m a bum,” Mr. Ross, whose full name is Salvatore Ross Jr., said.

The story of Sam Ross has the makings of a ballad, with its heart-rending arc from hardscrabble childhood to decorated war hero to hardscrabble adulthood. His effort to create a future for himself by enlisting in the Army exploded in the desert during a munitions disposal operation in Baghdad. He was 20.

He was also on his own. Mr. Ross, who is estranged from his mother and whose father is serving a life sentence for murdering his stepmother, does not have the family support that many other severely wounded veterans depend on. Various relatives have stepped in at various times, but Mr. Ross, embittered by a difficult childhood and by what the war cost him, has had a push-pull relationship with those who sought to assist him.

Several people have taken a keen interest in Mr. Ross, among them Representative John P. Murtha, the once-hawkish Democrat from Pennsylvania. When Mr. Murtha publicly turned against the war in Iraq in 2005, he cited the shattered life of Mr. Ross, one of his first constituents to be seriously wounded, as a pivotal influence.

Mr. Murtha’s office assisted Mr. Ross in negotiating the military health care bureaucracy. Homes for Our Troops, a nonprofit group based in Massachusetts, built him a beautiful log cabin. Military doctors carefully tended Mr. Ross’s physical wounds: the loss of his eyesight, of his left leg below the knee and of his hearing in one ear, among other problems.

But that help was not enough to save Mr. Ross from the loneliness and despair that engulfed him. Overwhelmed by severe symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, including routine nightmares of floating over Iraq that ended with a blinding boom, he “self-medicated” with alcohol and illegal drugs. He finally hit rock bottom when he landed in the state psychiatric hospital, where he is, sadly, thrilled to be.

“Seventeen times of trying to commit suicide, I think it’s time to give up,” Mr. Ross said, speaking in the forensic unit of the Mayview State Hospital in Bridgeville. “Lots of them were screaming out cries for help, and nobody paid attention. But finally somebody has.”


But Jobn Murtha can't be there for all of them; all the tens of thousands of walking and non-walking wounded; all those who may seem fit on the outside but their psyches are shattered. These soldiers have a commander-in-chief who doesn't hesitate to exploit them as props for political purposes, but these are also men trained to be tough, and tough guys have a very hard time admitting they need help.

What the military needs to do is provide active outreach to every returning soldier. Find a way to fund it somehow. But every returning soldier should receive a phone call or a visit once a month "just to see how you're doing and if you need anything." The military breaks a soldier down to turn him into a killing machine. It has an obligation to put him back together if he's lucky enough to make it home.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, March 10, 2007

The reality of war
Posted by Jill | 5:43 PM
Do you think George W. Bush and his neocon apologists have ever seen these photos? And if they have, does it touch them in any way?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, March 08, 2007

Whack-a-Mole
Posted by Jill | 6:35 AM
The glorious surge:

Insurgents have sought to intensify attacks during a Baghdad security crackdown and additional U.S. forces will be sent to areas outside the capital where militant groups are regrouping, the new commander of U.S. forces in Iraq said Thursday.

U.S. Gen. David Petraeus said the troop buildups outside Baghdad will focus on Diyala province northeast of Baghdad, a growing hotbed for suspected Sunni extremists fleeing the U.S.-Iraqi security operation in Baghdad.

But Petraeus stressed that military force alone is "not sufficient" to end the violence in Iraq and political talks must eventually include some militant groups now opposing the U.S.-backed government.

"This is critical," Petraeus said in his first news conference since taking over command last month. He noted that such political negotiations "will determine in the long run the success of this effort."

Petraeus listed a series of high-profile attacks since U.S. and Iraqi forces began the security sweep three weeks ago, including a suicide blast at a mostly Shiite university and an assassination attempt against one of Iraq's vice presidents.

The Pentagon has pledged 17,500 combat troops to the capital. Petraeus has said the full contingent should not be in place until early June. He declined to say how many U.S. forces will be deployed to Diyala, which the group al-Qaida in Iraq has made one its main staging grounds.

Military officials believe many insurgents have shifted from Baghdad to Diyala to escape the security operation.


Unless this Administration is willing to institute a true draft and send massive numbers of U.S. soldiers all over Iraq -- in perpetuity -- to quell the violence, no effort consisting of less is going to work. This is not an endorsement of such a course, it's just the reality. Why the Administration refuses to consider a draft, given its lame duck status, is puzzling, given Bush's repeated assertion that "it has to work." After all, it's not as if he gives a rat's ass about the soldiers and their families who will be affected.

Bob Herbert:


Why in the world is anyone surprised that the Bush administration has not been taking good care of wounded and disabled American troops?

Real-life human needs have never been a priority of this administration. The evidence is everywhere — from the mind-bending encounter with the apocalypse in Baghdad, to the ruined residential neighborhoods in New Orleans, to the anxious families in homes across America who are offering tearful goodbyes to loved ones heading off to yet another pointless tour in Iraq.

The trial and conviction of Scooter Libby opened the window wide on the twisted values and priorities of the hawkish operation in the vice president’s office. No worry about the troops there.

And President Bush has always given the impression that he is more interested in riding his bicycle at the ranch in Texas than in taking care of his life and death responsibilities around the world.

That whistling sound you hear is the wind blowing across the emptiness of the administration’s moral landscape.

U.S. troops have been treated like trash since the beginning of Mr. Bush’s catastrophic adventure in Iraq. Have we already forgotten that soldier from the Tennessee National Guard who dared to ask Donald Rumsfeld why the troops had to go scrounging in landfills for “hillbilly armor” — scrap metal — to protect their vehicles from roadside bombs?

[snip]

Have we forgotten that while most Americans have sacrificed zilch for this war, the mostly uncomplaining soldiers and marines are being sent into the combat zones for two, three and four tours? Multiple combat tours are an unconscionable form of Russian roulette that heightens the chances of a warrior being killed or maimed.

In the old days, these troops would have been referred to as cannon fodder. However you want to characterize them now, their casually unfair treatment is an expression of the belief that they are expendable.

[snip]

There is something profoundly evil about a country encouraging young men and women to go off and fight its wars and then shortchanging them on medical care and other forms of assistance when they come back with wounds that will haunt them forever.



Iraq is FUBAR no matter what we do, and George W. Bush, because of his need to prove that his dick is bigger than Poppy's, is at fault, along with Dick Cheney's greed. The question is whether Iraq is going to be FUBAR with additional American casualties or without them, and how many Americans must we sacrifice before we have somehow atoned for allowing this president to do this.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, March 05, 2007

Just so much cannon fodder
Posted by Jill | 6:45 AM
In case you thought that Walter Reed was just an isolated case of a military medical care facility that's going to be shut down anyway being neglected, guess again:

Ray Oliva went into the spare bedroom in his home in Kelseyville, Calif., to wrestle with his feelings. He didn't know a single soldier at Walter Reed, but he felt he knew them all. He worried about the wounded who were entering the world of military health care, which he knew all too well. His own VA hospital in Livermore was a mess. The gown he wore was torn. The wheelchairs were old and broken.

"It is just not Walter Reed," Oliva slowly tapped out on his keyboard at 4:23 in the afternoon on Friday. "The VA hospitals are not good either except for the staff who work so hard. It brings tears to my eyes when I see my brothers and sisters having to deal with these conditions. I am 70 years old, some say older than dirt but when I am with my brothers and sisters we become one and are made whole again."

Stories of neglect and substandard care have flooded in from soldiers, their family members, veterans, doctors and nurses working inside the system. They describe depressing living conditions for outpatients at other military bases around the country, from Fort Lewis in Washington state to Fort Dix in New Jersey. They tell stories -- their own versions, not verified -- of callous responses to combat stress and a system ill equipped to handle another generation of psychologically scarred vets.

[snip]

Sandy Karen was horrified when her 21-year-old son was discharged from the Naval Medical Center in San Diego a few months ago and told to report to the outpatient barracks, only to find the room swarming with fruit flies, trash overflowing and a syringe on the table. "The staff sergeant says, 'Here are your linens' to my son, who can't even stand up," said Karen, of Brookeville, Md. "This kid has an open wound, and I'm going to put him in a room with fruit flies?" She took her son to a hotel instead.

"My concern is for the others, who don't have a parent or someone to fight for them," Karen said. "These are just kids. Who would have ever looked in on my son?"

Capt. Leslie Haines was sent to Fort Knox in Kentucky for treatment in 2004 after being flown out of Iraq. "The living conditions were the worst I'd ever seen for soldiers," he said. "Paint peeling, mold, windows that didn't work. I went to the hospital chaplain to get them to issue blankets and linens. There were no nurses. You had wounded and injured leading the troops."

Hundreds of soldiers contacted The Washington Post through telephone calls and e-mails, many of them describing their bleak existence in Medhold.


For the last four years, The Bush Administration, Congressional Republicans, and their mindless, grinning supporters have succeeded in painting those of us who disagreed with their policies as "unpatriotic", "treasonous", and "not supporting the troops." Even now, such accusations from Republicans have cowed Democrats as a few of them attempted to actually do something about this president's misadventure in Iraq, saying that disallowing funding for the "surge" demonstrated lack of "support for the troops."

Even now, more troops are being fed into this misadventure of a war, and once again there is no Plan B:


During a White House meeting last week, a group of governors asked President Bush and Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about their backup plan for Iraq. What would the administration do if its new strategy didn't work?

The conclusion they took away, the governors later said, was that there is no Plan B. "I'm a Marine," Pace told them, "and Marines don't talk about failure. They talk about victory."

In the weeks since Bush announced the new plan for Iraq -- including an increase of 21,500 U.S. combat troops, additional reconstruction assistance and stepped-up pressure on the Iraqi government -- senior officials have rebuffed questions about other options in the event of failure. Eager to appear resolute and reluctant to provide fodder for skeptics, they have responded with a mix of optimism and evasion.


It is time for Washington Democrats to get off their knees, stop internalizing these false accusations, and finally act as watchdogs for the military, because God knows that Republicans don't give a shit about these kids. Republicans have made perfectly clear that they regard the young men and women who serve in the military as expendable -- just so much cannon fodder to be used for political advantage, put in harm's way without adequate equipment and then sent home under cover of night -- invisibly -- in body bags. Those who survive are an embarrassment to the Administration, so they must be hidden away in filthy and inadequate VA facilities, away from prying eyes that might question the cause for which they lost their limbs and faculties and being treated with inadequate care, lest it become necessary for corporate CEOs to perhaps have to pay a few more taxes for their care.

In the 2008 campaigns, from the Congressional level on up, Republicans are once again going to try to paint Democrats as weak on security, as not supportive of the troops. Democrats should hang photographs of the conditions at Walter Reed and other VA facilities around these necks, weighted down with anvils. Because this is what Republican policies that take the wealth of this country and stuff it into the pockets of wealthy campaign cronies and corporate executives do. This is American Republicanism in full flower. Let voters finally see what it looks like.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, March 01, 2007

Walter Reed: the military scandal no one was supposed to know about
Posted by Jill | 7:27 AM
I don't ever again want to hear another Republican accuse anyone of not "supporting the troops". It is the Republicans who have looked the other way while returning wounded veterans lived in squalor. It is the Republicans who want to cut veterans' medical benefits to continue to feed the corporate war machine. It is the Republicans who regard these kids as just so much breathing carrion -- nameless, faceless (except when needed for a photo op), expendable.

The Army's own surgeon general knew about conditions at Walter Reed -- and did nothing:

Top officials at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, including the Army's surgeon general, have heard complaints about outpatient neglect from family members, veterans groups and members of Congress for more than three years.

A procession of Pentagon and Walter Reed officials expressed surprise last week about the living conditions and bureaucratic nightmares faced by wounded soldiers staying at the D.C. medical facility. But as far back as 2003, the commander of Walter Reed, Lt. Gen. Kevin C. Kiley, who is now the Army's top medical officer, was told that soldiers who were wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan were languishing and lost on the grounds, according to interviews.

Steve Robinson, director of veterans affairs at Veterans for America, said he ran into Kiley in the foyer of the command headquarters at Walter Reed shortly after the Iraq war began and told him that "there are people in the barracks who are drinking themselves to death and people who are sharing drugs and people not getting the care they need."

"I met guys who weren't going to appointments because the hospital didn't even know they were there," Robinson said. Kiley told him to speak to a sergeant major, a top enlisted officer.


Every day there is another horror story about this Administration's callousness where the men and women who fight is completely gratuituos wars are concerned. Every day hey give lip service to patriotism and supporting the troops, and every day they show that these kids mean no more to them than the kid in the rat-infested tenement does. And through cuts in edcation, in Pell grants, in health care; though policies that encourage plant closings and outsourcing, they are making damn sure that the kid in the rat-infested tenement grows up with no other options but to be cannon fodder for them. It would be one thing if these kids really were being sent to defend their country. But it's criminal when they are being sent to fight corporate wars -- and then neglected when they are wounded in the line of duty.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, February 19, 2007

More on how the Bush Administration and their Republican lackeys "support the troops"
Posted by Jill | 9:54 AM
If Anne Hull and Dana Priest don't win a Pulitzer for this, there truly is no justice in the world:

The conflict in Iraq has hatched a virtual town of desperation and dysfunction, clinging to the pilings of Walter Reed. The wounded are socked away for months and years in random buildings and barracks in and around this military post.

[snip]

Mologne House is afloat on a river of painkillers and antipsychotic drugs. One night, a strapping young infantryman loses it with a woman who is high on her son's painkillers. "Quit taking all the soldier medicine!" he screams.

Pill bottles clutter the nightstands: pills for depression or insomnia, to stop nightmares and pain, to calm the nerves.

[snip]

Bomb blasts are the most common cause of injury in Iraq, and nearly 60 percent of the blast victims also suffer from traumatic brain injury, according to Walter Reed's studies, which explains why some at Mologne House wander the hallways trying to remember their room numbers.

Some soldiers and Marines have been here for 18 months or longer. Doctor's appointments and evaluations are routinely dragged out and difficult to get. A board of physicians must review hundreds of pages of medical records to determine whether a soldier is fit to return to duty. If not, the Physical Evaluation Board must decide whether to assign a rating for disability compensation. For many, this is the start of a new and bitter battle.

Months roll by and life becomes a blue-and-gold hotel room where the bathroom mirror shows the naked disfigurement of war's ravages. There are toys in the lobby of Mologne House because children live here. Domestic disputes occur because wives or girlfriends have moved here. Financial tensions are palpable. After her husband's traumatic injury insurance policy came in, one wife cleared out with the money. Older National Guard members worry about the jobs they can no longer perform back home.

While Mologne House has a full bar, there is not one counselor or psychologist assigned there to assist soldiers and families in crisis -- an idea proposed by Walter Reed social workers but rejected by the military command that runs the post.

[snip]

Dell and Annette's weekdays are spent making the rounds of medical appointments, physical therapy sessions and evaluations for Dell's discharge from the Army. After 19 years, he is no longer fit for service. He uses a cane to walk. He is unable to count out change in the hospital cafeteria. He takes four Percocets a day for pain and has gained 40 pounds from medication and inactivity. Lumbering and blue-eyed, Dell is a big ox baby.
Annette puts on makeup every morning and does her hair, some semblance of normalcy, but her new job in life is watching Dell.

"I'm worried about how he's gonna fit into society," she says one night, as Dell wanders down the hall to the laundry room.

The more immediate worry concerns his disability rating. Army doctors are disputing that Dell's head injury was the cause of his mental impairment. One report says that he was slow in high school and that his cognitive problems could be linked to his native intelligence rather than to his injury.


Anything to avoid paying a disability claim.

I can't even begin to describe how angry this makes me. Every day I am at the computer at 6 AM, documenting the horrors of the day as perpetrated by the evil men who run this country. Every day there's something else to make your brain scream, "No more!" But few things I've read of late make me this angry.

It's isn't that these are Americans and so are somehow more important than the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi casualties that our leaders have created as they crow about the sanctity of fetal life here at home. It's because for five years we have been bludgeoned with messages of "supporting the troops", both by Republican leaders and the assholes with their ribbon magnets we encounter on a daily basis. You know, the ones who would key your car and slash your tires if you dared put a bumper sticker that said "Support the troops -- bring them home" on your own car. It's this notion that in order to make sure that over 3000 Americans like the ones portrayed in this WaPo series didn't die in vain, we have to send another few thousand to die in vain.

And what's worse is that the ones who die are the lucky ones, because they are at least out of their pain and not having to face a government that writes them off the minute they are no longer acceptable cannon fodder while using them as a political sledgehammer. Republicans seek to make tax cuts for the wealthy permanent while their leader's budget cuts veterans' health care funding as a way of cooking the books enough to tout a balanced budget by 2012. The VA has a backlog of 600,000 disability claims. In Bush's home state of Texas, the VA office in El Paso says that more than 21% of the claims are over six months old. And a veterans clinic in Texarkana is forced to cancel appointments because they don't have adequate staffing.

When I posted on the first article in this series, I said that everyone -- EVERYONE -- who still supports this war, who supports this "surge"; every Senator who voted for this war and refuses to admit that it was wrong, everyone still driving around with those fucking yellow ribbon magnets -- they are ALL worthy of nothing but disgust and contempt. There was a time when we could say that there's no crime in wanting to believe that the government is truly acting for what it believes is the good of the country. But when you have the kind of proof that we have seen, over and over and over again, that this government is out for its own enrichment, for its own power, for its own greed, and that our leaders don't give a shit about ANY Americans, particularly those who are supposed to be serving this country and are entitled to thanks, there is no longer an excuse for that continued delusion.

It's time for the 28-odd percent of morons who still cling to their delusions about this president to wake the fuck up. Meanwhile, the rest of us have to start fighting for those stuck in the hell that is the VA medical system. Becuase damn it, someone has to, and the greedy Republicans in Congress won't, and the cowardly Democrats who are STILL afraid of being branded "soft on terror" sure as hell won't.

UPDATE: The intrepid Pam wades into the mile-high pile of human waste that is the collective posters at Frei Republik, so you don't have to. Go see what the wingnuts are saying...if you want to be positively ill. And Roxanne reprints a comment she received from an actual soldier -- as opposed to the armchair warriors who think we should just keep sending more kids over to die.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, February 17, 2007

You know what REALLY sends "the wrong message to our troops"?
Posted by Jill | 9:17 PM
Treating them like this when they're wounded:

Behind the door of Army Spec. Jeremy Duncan's room, part of the wall is torn and hangs in the air, weighted down with black mold. When the wounded combat engineer stands in his shower and looks up, he can see the bathtub on the floor above through a rotted hole. The entire building, constructed between the world wars, often smells like greasy carry-out. Signs of neglect are everywhere: mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches, stained carpets, cheap mattresses.

This is the world of Building 18, not the kind of place where Duncan expected to recover when he was evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from Iraq last February with a broken neck and a shredded left ear, nearly dead from blood loss. But the old lodge, just outside the gates of the hospital and five miles up the road from the White House, has housed hundreds of maimed soldiers recuperating from injuries suffered in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The common perception of Walter Reed is of a surgical hospital that shines as the crown jewel of military medicine. But 5 1/2 years of sustained combat have transformed the venerable 113-acre institution into something else entirely -- a holding ground for physically and psychologically damaged outpatients. Almost 700 of them -- the majority soldiers, with some Marines -- have been released from hospital beds but still need treatment or are awaiting bureaucratic decisions before being discharged or returned to active duty.

They suffer from brain injuries, severed arms and legs, organ and back damage, and various degrees of post-traumatic stress. Their legions have grown so exponentially -- they outnumber hospital patients at Walter Reed 17 to 1 -- that they take up every available bed on post and spill into dozens of nearby hotels and apartments leased by the Army. The average stay is 10 months, but some have been stuck there for as long as two years.

Not all of the quarters are as bleak as Duncan's, but the despair of Building 18 symbolizes a larger problem in Walter Reed's treatment of the wounded, according to dozens of soldiers, family members, veterans aid groups, and current and former Walter Reed staff members interviewed by two Washington Post reporters, who spent more than four months visiting the outpatient world without the knowledge or permission of Walter Reed officials. Many agreed to be quoted by name; others said they feared Army retribution if they complained publicly.

[snip]

On the worst days, soldiers say they feel like they are living a chapter of "Catch-22." The wounded manage other wounded. Soldiers dealing with psychological disorders of their own have been put in charge of others at risk of suicide.

Disengaged clerks, unqualified platoon sergeants and overworked case managers fumble with simple needs: feeding soldiers' families who are close to poverty, replacing a uniform ripped off by medics in the desert sand or helping a brain-damaged soldier remember his next appointment.

"We've done our duty. We fought the war. We came home wounded. Fine. But whoever the people are back here who are supposed to give us the easy transition should be doing it," said Marine Sgt. Ryan Groves, 26, an amputee who lived at Walter Reed for 16 months. "We don't know what to do. The people who are supposed to know don't have the answers. It's a nonstop process of stalling."


For the last few years, Republicans have given lip service to supporting the troops while cutting funding for their armor, their equipment, and their medical care. American citizens have been slapping ribbon magnets made in China on their SUVs and saying it's how they show their support. And when our troops are wounded, they come home and are put into a facility that is more like the weird hospital scenes in the film Jacob's Ladder than like the kind of state-of-the-art recuperative facility these young men and women deserve.

This Administration, Congressional Republicans, Joe Lieberman, and any American that still supports this war are worthy of nothing but our contempt and disgust. You want to talk about genocide and brutality towards an entire group of people? The Republicans in Washington are committing genocide against an entire class of Americans -- those idealistic, or foolish, enough to believe that when they volunteered to serve their country, their Commander-in-Chief would give a shit about them.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Maybe it's time to revive the notion of "competence"
Posted by Jill | 6:52 AM
Remember 1988, when Michael Dukakis was ridiculed for talking about "competence"? Maybe that notion wasn't so ridiculous after all. When you look at Iraq, spiralling debt, and everything else the Bush Administration has touched, competence looks pretty damn appealing. But even if you support bankrupting the country in perpetuity to finance the Iraq War, you've got to be a bit perturbed about a government that wants ever more of your information at the same time as it can't handle what it has:

Three or four FBI laptop computers are lost or stolen each month and many times the agency doesn't know whether information on the machines is sensitive or classified, the Justice Department's inspector general said in a report Monday.

Inspector General Glenn Fine said the FBI is reducing thefts and disappearances of weapons and laptop computers, but the bureau acknowledged in a statement Monday that "more needs to be done."


Gee, ya think?


The Boston field office reported a stolen laptop containing software for creating identification badges. The laboratory division at Quantico, Va., said a stolen laptop had names, addresses and phone numbers of FBI personnel.

"Perhaps most troubling, the FBI could not determine in many cases whether the lost or stolen laptop computers contained sensitive or classified information," the report said. "Such information may include case information, personal identifying information or classified information on FBI operations."

Of the 160 laptops lost or stolen over a 44-month period, 10 contained sensitive or classified information. The bureau did not have records on whether 51 others had such data.


Meanwhile, the Veterans Affairs Department of the Support Our Troops Adminstration -- you know, the one that cut funds for veterans' health care and sends them to war with inadequate equipment -- is as cavalier about their information as it is about their lives:


The Department of Veterans Affairs began notifying 1.8 million veterans and doctors Monday that their personal and business information could be on a portable hard drive that has been missing from an Alabama hospital for nearly three weeks.

The hard drive may have contained Social Security numbers and other personal information from about 535,000 individuals and billing information on 1.3 million doctors nationwide, the VA said. That's more than 37 times more people than authorities initially believed were affected.

An employee at the VA medical center in Birmingham reported the external hard drive missing on Jan. 22. The drive was used to back up information on the employee's office computer. It may have contained data from research projects, the department said.

U.S. Rep. Artur Davis (news, bio, voting record) questioned why it took the agency so long to begin sending out notification letters.

"I certainly understand that the VA wanted to get a handle on the facts. But it became very apparent very early on that they had a breach of security," said Davis, a Democrat from Birmingham.

Veterans Affairs officials said they were moving as quickly as they could. "We are providing information as we learn it from an investigation," said spokesman Matt Burns in Washington.

The VA first publicly revealed the equipment was missing 11 days after it was reported, saying then that personal information on as many as 48,000 veterans may have been stolen.

The VA said Monday it doesn't have any reason to believe anyone has misused data from the hard drive, which is also at the center of a criminal investigation. The agency offered a year of free credit monitoring to anyone whose information is compromised.

Davis said the department told him that the missing storage unit included the Social Security numbers and names of about 10,000 people, plus another 525,000 Social Security numbers. The information on doctors includes names and Medicare billing codes, he said.


Free credit monitoring. Well, that's damn nice of them. How about taking care of the fucking data correctly in the first place?

This is what happens when you have a government that is completely technologically illiterate. You can export an entire database now to a flat file that you can take out of a facility on a flash drive that fits in your pocket. These drives are easily lost. I ought to know, I've lost four of them. But all four were mine, none of them contained sensitive information, unless you call chapters from my unfinished novel "sensitive", and all four are probably in my house under a piece of furniture somewhere.

It's one thing if this happens once, because unless you're prepared to search employees on their way out of the building, you're not going to be able to 100% guarantee that no sensitive information leaves the building. However, I'd be interested in knowing how many people who have lost such information and placed the entire financial lives of those whose information they've lost at risk have faced consequences.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share