"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Monday, March 09, 2009

Everyone's a critic
Posted by Jill | 5:28 AM
I kind of liked it better when Bill Gates was someone you could hate -- hate for his ruthless business practices and his company's buggy software that despite its ricketiness always became the industry standard. But there's been no getting around the fact that Bill Gates has done what preposterously wealthy men used to do with their money instead of buying 47 megamansions and five-figure wastebaskets: he's turned to philanthropy. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation doesn't pursue just pipe-dreamy stuff like giving laptops to kids while their families have nothing to eat. The Foundation works on projects like helping communities in developing countries grow food, treating and eradicating malaria, and creating schools in these countries. From a January 2009 Foundation press release:

“I believe that the wealthy have a responsibility to invest in addressing inequity. This is especially true when the constraints on others are so great,” says Gates. He added that if investments are not made, "we will come out of the economic downtown in a world even more unequal, with greater inequities in health and education and fewer opportunities for people to improve their lives. There is no reason to accept that, when we know how to make huge gains over the long term.”

Contrast this notion to Rick Santelli standing in a room full of stock traders screaming about "loser mortgages." Contrast this notion to the bonuses and trips and junkets that zombie banks and AIG have been doling out with taxpayer money.

Say what you will about the company he ran, but it would be hard to fault what he's done with the money he's made, but someone always finds a way.

Today it's Joseph Romm, who at Salon today makes the case that it's somehow Gates' responsibility to address global warming:
Now, you might think a foundation focusing on third-world "sustainable" development would devote some significant portion of its resources toward preventing catastrophic global warming. After all, on our current emissions path, we will have destroyed a livable climate by 2100. Most every independent scientific and economic analysis says the developing world will suffer horribly. This goes double for the region Gates is focusing much of the foundation's resources on -- Africa, a continent facing climate-driven desertification in the north and the south, a continent with huge coastal populations.

But, in fact, the Gates Foundation has no program to help prevent global warming. Back in 2006, when Gates first announced that he planned to spend most of his time running the foundation, Newsweek raised the climate change issue in an interview:


Q: I know you're concerned about global warming. Will the foundation become involved with that?

A: I'm already reading some books on energy and the environment, but I will read a lot more two years from now and think whether there's something the foundation should do in those areas. The angle I'll have when I'll look at most things is, What about the 4 billion poorest people? What about energy and environmental issues for them?

Here's what Gates should have learned by now about the key energy and environmental issues facing the 4 billion poorest people. Using a "middle of the road" greenhouse gas emissions scenario, a study in Science found that for the more than 5 billion people who will be living in the tropics and subtropics by 2100, growing-season temperatures "will exceed the most extreme seasonal temperatures recorded from 1900 to 2006." The authors conclude: "Half of world's population could face climate-driven food crisis by 2100."

A study led by MIT economists found that "the median poor country's income will be about 50 percent lower than it would be had there been no climate change." And that was based on a 3-degree C warming by 2100, about half the warming we are currently on track to reach. A further study led by scientists from the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that several regions would see rainfall reductions "comparable to those of the Dust Bowl era." Worse, unlike the Dust Bowl, which lasted a decade or two, this climate change would be "largely irreversible for 1,000 years after emissions stop."


Perhaps soo, as the governor of Alaska would say. But when a fire requires a thousand gallons of water to put out, and you have two gallons of water that would do nothing to put out the fire when everyone else who has water is looking the other way and pretending there's no fire, or give your two gallons to a small group of children who will die within hours of dehydration, what are you going to do?

Global warming requires a global response. Gates may be late to the table on this, but so is everyone else. I recognize that we are, or perhaps have, already run out of time. But until the rest of the world, and certainly the United States, gets fully on board with sustainable, renewable energy that does not contribute to the problem, it's hard to point the finger at Bill Gates and say "YOU Do something about it."

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, March 26, 2008

21-Gun Salute for H-1B Visas
All of the Big Guns are firing the battle cry for increasing the numbers of H-1B visas being issued, as dictated by Bill Gates in his Committee of One testimony in front of Congress. The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, The New York Times, and others dutifully lined up to spout out the same, tired old high tech industry party line. (Yawn!) More foreign guest workers are needed in order to remain competitive, and American jobs will disappear if the visa cap is not raised.

Network World came up with this innovative solution for working within the current 65,000 H-1B visa cap:

One option that eliminates the need to work with immigration lawyers is rooting out potential candidates for the open position already on staff. For many hiring and IT managers, training in house technical employees on skills that are considered critical going forward is a better option that [sic] looking outside the company for talent.

"Managers can look for internal talent that may need a little more training or need to work in a different style," says Albert Porco, CIO at Kings County Medical Center in New York. "There are times when the most talented person is two or three levels down in the organization. Also at times, you don't need superstars, you need staff that can get the job done."

Talk about thinking outside the box! That ranks right up with the unusual idea of having a company set up a booth at a career fair to recruit recent college graduates!

How's this for particularly hateful commentary:

Kamal Jain, Director of Operations and Customer Service at Auraria Networks in Boxborough, Mass., agrees saying if IT hiring managers exhaust options outside of the company, then they need to look at the pool of talent already producing at the company.

"Consider career-changers who have the right attitude, intelligence, demeanor, etc. to fit your needs and then take some chances on training and development," Jain says. "It’s not a good way to get senior people, but it can bring in a great pool of talent which can free up enough experienced people to allow them to grow into the senior roles you may need filled."

I can write an entire post about this statement alone, but notice how the concept of hiring IT staff that have already reached "senior" status is completely missing.

Finally, (buckle your seat belts - you won't be ready for this one.)

Digitas' Russell says that her team and the company’s management is using a new mantra when it comes to hiring external or internal candidates that involves considering a broader range of qualified candidates.

"Management and recruiting is pushing people to consider what could be trained. If a candidate has 80% of the skills needed, we can hire them and we can teach the other 20% of skills," she says.

A company willing to look at a candidate who is not a 100% match for the position? I thought I'd never see that happening again.

The Washington Post waited a while, but they finally came up with "Visas Needed" in their Editorials section. According to Vdare, Norm Matloff at UC-Davis has put out the call to bombard the Post with letters protesting this story. He reminds us that Mrs. Bill Gates sits on the paper's board. Matloff advises us to "Let your draft sit for at least an hour, then revise it with a clearer head, before submitting."

(Phooey! I want to write it while my blood pressure is still elevated.)

Finally, here's a pretty good Op-Ed piece I found in Newsblaze that gives the other side of the H-1B story. In "The Current H-1B Visa Program Must Be Abolished or Reformed", John Wallace points out that:
The H-1B visa program was originally created to assist American employers who were having trouble finding American high-tech workers for their businesses. It allowed a fixed number of foreign workers come to the United States to "temporarily" fill those positions while the American companies and the federal government invested time and money in upgrading the training of American workers to meet the new skill levels required.
Here's how the H-1B program really works:
The H-1B work visa program was supposed to be used to bolster the U.S. economy by helping American-owned companies. Under the program, American companies can use the speciality visa to hire foreign software programmers or computer scientists with rare skills in order to encourage innovation and improving competitiveness. Instead, foreign companies such as Infosys and Wipro are using our own government program to undermine the American economy by wiping out American jobs. These foreign-owned companies are bringing low-cost workers into the U.S., training them in the offices of American business clients, and then rotating them back home after a year or two so they can provide low cost, out-sourced tech services that causes American IT workers to lose their jobs. How is this helping American workers and American businesses?
Notice how Wallace's story can only be printed in a media outlet that hardly anyone has ever heard of (as TooTruthy points out in the end of her blog post).

(Cross-posted at Carrie's Nation.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, March 14, 2008

Like Clockwork
On Wednesday, March 12, 2008, the Committee of One, Bill Gates, testified in front of Congress that the H-1B visa limit of 65,000 for "highly skilled" guest workers (plus 20,000 for advanced degree holders) needed to be raised. His speech, which I've provided in the link above, is absolutely breathtaking as he talks about science and computing and networking and how many computers we have and how computers and its [Microsoft] software affects just about every aspect of our lives.

(For the uninitiated, letting in foreign skilled workers seems like a good way to address critical shortages that may crop up in the scientific, engineering and computer science fields. What I, and many other people object to, is the fact that employment opportunities and salaries for American technical workers have plummeted since the beginning of the H-1B program in 1990. We are repeatedly told that the United States needs more high tech workers. Oddly enough, both recent college graduates and experienced technical workers have difficulty finding employment in their career fields, despite the fact that high tech companies are supposedly begging for qualified workers. Most companies have impossible-to-meet standards for American workers, yet those standards seem to disappear altogether for lower-paid foreign workers. Even more amazing, American workers are forced to train their foreign replacements in order to receive severance packages. At the end of the cycle, the foreign workers head back overseas, taking their jobs with them. Predictably, enrollment in computer science programs and other technical fields are declining at fast rates.)

Back to Bill Gates' testimony. Skim through the pages where he talks about how the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, through its largesse, will make everything that is already good in this world even better. You'll find it didn't take long for him to get to what's really eating him.
  • We're a nation of dunces.
  • We need more foreign guest workers.
  • Taxpayers need to foot the bill for basic research and training more high tech workers.
  • High tech companies need more tax breaks.

Despite what Gates said in the rest of the pages of his speech, it all boiled down to, We Need More Foreign Guest Workers. If You Don't Give Us More Foreign Guest Workers, We'll Show You Who's Boss By Sending These Jobs Overseas.

Several members of Congress practically tripped over each other as they lined up to profess their fawning admiration for Bill Gates. Why shouldn't they, when so much money for potential campaign contributions and from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is at stake? Representative Bart Gordon, (D-Tennessee), said, "Bill Gates embodies both the American spirit of innovation and the theological virtue of charity. … I can think of no other witness better suited to share his insights with this committee."

A few Representatives had the guts to ask some tough questions. Dana Rohrbacher (R-California), asked if:

..........H-1B workers were driving down U.S. wages or replacing "B and C students" from the United States. Gates said no, citing a study released Monday by the pro-immigration think tank the National Foundation for American Policy, saying that for every H-1B position applied for, companies create an additional five jobs.

[Note from Carrie: How convenient that report came out just a few days before Gates' testimony.]

"The top people are going to be [paid] higher," Gates said. "It's just a question of what country they're working in."

For more good discussions on the National Foundation for American Policy report, you can read Rob Sanchez' and Norman Matloff's newsletters. Please also see Patrick Thibodeau's article at Computerworld for another good recap. (For some reason, I'm having a devil of a time trying to link to his article. If motivated, look for his article "Gates: U.S. Puts Tech Jobs at Risk by Capping Foreign Workers" dated March 12, 2008 under the "Government" section.)

Another member of Congress spoke up:

Rep. Laura Richardson, a California Democrat, challenged Microsoft and other tech companies to fund scholarships for science and engineering students with the money they use to recruit workers and apply for visas.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provides scholarships for 14,000 minority students, Gates noted. But more scholarships won't solve the problem of a lack of U.S. science and engineering students, he said.

"Scholarships can be helpful, but I'm not sure that alone would drive the shift we need," Gates said.

Predictably, by late Thursday afternoon, Gabrielle Giffords, (D-Arizona) introduced the Innovation Employment Act that would double the number of H-1B's being issued from 65,000 to 130,000 per year. A number of safeguards are supposed to be included in this bill, such as:

  • increasing the penalties for H-1B fraud
  • rejecting applications for "clear indicators of fraud"
  • prohibiting companies from hiring H-1B workers and then immediately outsourcing them to other companies
  • prohibiting companies "with more than 50 employees that have more than half of their staff as H-1B workers from hiring more H-1Bs"
  • prohibiting employers from advertising their jobs as being exclusively for H-1B workers

I say these "safeguards" are little more than window dressing. However, that will be another post for another day.

Many pundits admit that Congress will have a tough time passing legislation for higher numbers of H-1B workers during an election year, when people are finally reaching a consensus that unemployment rates are going higher while the economy is going sour. However, just for extra insurance, Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced the catchy-sounding Strengthening United States Technology And Innovation Now (or Sustain) Act, which would triple the number of H-1B visas being issued for 2008 and 2009.

(Cross-posted at Carrie's Nation.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Crocuses, Daffodils and ....Bill Gates?
As part of the annual Rite of Spring, Bill Gates will be heading from the state of Washington to Washington, D.C. to beg for an increase in the number of foreign workers who will be allowed in the United States. As Patrick Thibodeau in his March 3rd ComputerWorld article points out:

The topic of the hearing is familiar ground for Gates on Capitol Hill. But what makes his scheduled appearance on March 12 potentially explosive is its timing, less than three weeks before the start of the annual application rush for H-1B visas.

April 1 is the first day that U.S. immigration authorities will begin accepting H-1B applications for the federal government's 2009 fiscal year, which begins in October. Last year, the government stopped taking applications after receiving about 150,000 in a single day — far more than enough to exhaust the annual cap of 65,000 regular visas and 20,000 set aside for foreign nationals who have advanced degrees from U.S. universities.

Like last year, Bill Gates will be expected to be the only person to appear before Congress to address this issue. He will testify that Americans are too simple-minded for technical work and that only foreign workers have the talent and ability to take on these jobs. Also like last year, people like Kim Berry from The Programmers Guild are expected to rebut each and every charge, and declare that the only shortages Microsoft, Cisco, and Oracle et al are facing is a shortage of Americans who will do the work at substandard wages.

For a look at the ideal employee Gates has in mind, watch this video taken at the Microsoft Canada Development Center in Vancouver. Remember, this is the development center Microsoft claims they were forced to open to skirt the limits on foreign workers allowed in our country.

I see their point. The United States is definitely lacking in young programmers who don't like to work particularly hard and are champion Foosball players.

Naturally, there are intriguing events leading up to the drama. Job Destruction's Rob Sanchez reported on the behind-the-scenes machinations staged by Nancy Pelosi to try to increase the cap on H-1B and other guest worker visas, in addition to trying to (of course) offer another amnesty for illegal aliens. Far away from the big players in Washington D.C., I reported on the suspicious timing of a job fair where Michigan recruiters are trying to (don't laugh - this is so quaint) match up engineering students with local venture capitalists and their startup firms.

Patrick Thibodeau, the hard-working staff member of Computerworld who I find myself linking to more and more, posted this story of how Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) issued a letter describing even more abuses of the H-1B system:

"Everyday we're learning more and more, but it appears that most H-1B visas are going to foreign-based companies," said Grassley, in a statement. "U.S. businesses that need highly skilled workers are getting the short end of the stick."

In regard to the leasing of H-1B workers, Grassley, in his letter to Chertoff, charged that "hundreds" of foreign workers are "standing by, waiting for work" and are being offered for lease by their employers. The information about this practice came from a constituent in Iowa, not identified in the letter, who was being "bombarded" by these requests to lease H-1B workers, wrote Grassley.

"My constituent even said one company went so far to require him to sign a memorandum of understanding that helps the H-1B "factory firm" justify to the federal government that they have adequate business opportunity that requires additional visa holders," wrote Grassley. "It's a complete falsification of the market justification for additional H-1B workers."

I nominate this story for the annual March Surprise, where the important-sounding National Foundation for American Policy (which, according to Rob Sanchez, is merely a front for H-1B cheerleader Stuart Anderson), issued a report claiming that 5 to 7.5 jobs are created for Americans for every H-1B worker hired. I have some severe doubts as to the cause and effect of jobs magically appearing for Americans every time an H-1B visa is issued, and so does Rob Sanchez. He should have one of his Newsletters devoted to this issue showing up in his archives within the next few days.

In the meantime, MainStreamMedia and industry mouthpieces are dutifully running the story at InformationWeek, PCWorld, the Washington Post, InfoWorld, the National Association of Manufacturers Blog, and CNET News. Be sure look at the comments section on these sites, which are often more informative than the main articles.

(Cross-posted at Carrie's Nation.)

UPDATE: Here is the link announcing Bill Gates' appearance in front of the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Science and Technology.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Bill Gates Road Show
Is Microsoft's Bill Gates even relevant anymore? He just finished up a 6-university tour where he's still trying to browbeat students into majoring in information technology. It remains to be seen whether his speeches will inspire anyone to change their career field.

The first paragraph of this article from eSchool News was enough to make me puke:

A widespread shortage of information technology (IT) graduates across North America is forcing Microsoft Corp. and other software companies to look to developing countries such as China to meet their needs, Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates says.

“When we want to hire lots of software engineers, there is a shortage in North America—a pretty significant shortage,” Gates said in an interview with The Associated Press. “We have this tough problem: If you can’t get the engineers, then you have to have those other jobs be [relocated to] where the engineers are.”

Trust Gates to try to blame the American public for causing this "problem". According to Bill Gates and his Strong American Schools and Skills Commission cohorts, we are a nation of drooling idiots who weren't smart enough to keep our jobs during the dot-com bust, and aren't able to handle anything much above simple arithmetic when we graduate from high school. In reality, the only "problem" was the public relations fiasco suffered by Gates and other tech company CEO's when forced to confront the fact that the disappearance of IT workers and graduates was part of an elaborate plan to drastically lower labor costs. If you can downsize an entire generation of IT workers and scare their kids from any sort of technical career fields, it will be easier to contract the work out to lower-paid H-1B or L-1 visa workers, or offshore the jobs to lower cost overseas labor markets altogether. From Gates' point of view, things probably couldn't be better.

Could Bill Gates and others hire older workers who are still roaming our streets since the dot-com bust? Hmmh. It doesn't seem possible. According to David Vaskevitch, Microsoft's Senior Vice-President and Chief Technical Officer,
....younger workers have more energy and are sometimes more creative. But he adds there is a lot they don't know and can't know until they gain experience. So he says his company recruits aggressively for fresh talent on university campuses and for highly experienced engineers from within the industry. One is not at the expense of the other, he insists. For him, it is all about hiring the best and brightest—age and nationality are not important. He acknowledges that the vast majority of Microsoft hires are young, but that is because older workers tend to go into more senior jobs and there are fewer of those positions to begin with.
In other words, Microsoft needs an almost endless supply of college graduates, and needs a black hole to shovel the older workers into when they start demanding pay raises.

Why bother touring the universities and telling kids to major in IT fields? It's probably just an elaborate dog and pony show set up to convince us that Microsoft products should be appearing in every facet of our lives, and we need to be educated to use these products. As long as we keep up with our skills, and as long as he keeps nagging us that we're falling behind if we're not using all of his software, we'll keep buying his products. He can then devote his philanthropic life to destroying public schools and giving millions of dollars to private schools to make sure there are enough children who know enough about Microsoft products to keep his company afloat.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, January 30, 2007

The head of the Evil Empire guests on The Daily Show
Posted by Jill | 6:52 PM
Now this is completely surreal.

Part I:



Part II:




Here's what I want to know: How the hell does the richest man in the world still look like a college student? And what is he going to do to Comedy Central as punishment for using Macromedia Flash for its videos?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share