"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Friday, July 29, 2011

Is MSNBC deliberately trying to taint its own brand?
Posted by Jill | 6:39 AM
Pundits whose brains are incapable of holding two thoughts at the same time think that MSNBC is "the left's Fox News". But while most (not all) of MSNBC's news/commentary shows lean to the left of what passes for the center these days (which really resembles 1964 Goldwater conservatism more than anything else), there is one characteristic of MSNBC's hosts that does not apply to Fox: With the exception of Joe Scarborough, who's still living in a delusional Republicanland where idiotic mouth-frothing teabagger lunatics don't control his party, MSNBC hosts don't just pull lies out of their asses and pass them off as demonstrable fact. And especially now that they've unwisely jettisoned the oh-too-confrontational Cenk Uygur, MSNBC represents the genteel left. Like it or not, you're never going to see Lawrence O'Donnell (who admirably fought bravely on as Joey "What ABOUT Lori Klausutis, anyway?" the Scar tried to filibuster him yesterday morning) call Rep. Peter King an asshole on the air. And even Rachel Maddow, who is now completely free to do pretty much whatever she wants, as MSNBC's reigning star, tends to wield tiny poison darts at those she demolishes rather than of carrying a big stick -- and doing it all with a smile. It's a successful formula that has managed to survive, and even thrive, in the post-Olbermann era, even as people like me have returned to the Olbermann fold, preferring to watch "The Last Word" as time permits the next day.

But aside from the factual differences between MSNBC's coverage of current events and that of Fox, MSNBC's point of pride is hat it hasn't acted as the propaganda arm of a political party the way Fox News does. O'Donnell is a bit too much of an Obama cheerleader for my taste; obviously still subscribing to the 11-dimensional chess theory of Obama rather than what increasingly looks like the reality -- that at best Obama is twisting himself into pretzels to appeal to and appease the right because of his unique childhood baggage, while at worst he really IS a moderate-right conservative. At least O'Donnell has arrived at his views through a coherent thought proess and is prepared to argue his points rather than just spouting talking points. But as we found out with the jettisoning of Cenk Uygur, MSNBC is first and foremost about access, and when opinion interferes with that access, Phil Griffin steps in.

The best spin on the decision to replace Uygur with Al Sharpton, despite strong ratings, is to add more diversity to MSNBC's all-white lineup (though it seems to me that with Muslims and gays being the hated minorities of choice on the right these days, a lineup that has an out lesbian in Rachel Maddow as its public face, the British-of-Pakistani-origins Martin Bashir on in the afternoon and Uygur, who was born in Turkey to Sunni Muslim parents, is more diverse than ANY on other news channel). So when MSNBC decided to replace Cenk Uygur with Al Sharpton at 6 PM, I had to scratch my head. Sharpton? Yes, Sharpton can be incisive and even funny when talking off-the-cuff, and he stole the show at the 2004 presidential debates, but even cable news is not journalism school. And for a sizable portion of the population, the name "Al Sharpton" is still far too closely associated with the image of Tawana Brawley insisting that "No one manipsnates (sic) me or my family."

Sharpton is a bright guy and has been a media star, or at the very least a media figure, for a long time; and even Rachel Maddow had that deer-in-the-headlights look for a few weeks in the beginning as she became more comfortable with a teleprompter. I'm sure that once he's more comfortable, we'll see the witty side of Sharpton come out, but demeanor isn't Sharpton's only problem. As Glenn Greenwald notes, Sharpton really IS the left's equivalent of a Fox News host -- to the detriment of the MSNBC brand:
On Sunday, Cenk Uygur was interviewed by CNN's Howard Kurtz about Uygur's departure from MSNBC, and Ugyur claimed that Al Sharpton -- widely reported to be his replacement -- vowed in a 60 Minutes interview never to criticize President Obama under any circumstances.  When I first heard Ugyur make this claim, I assumed it was hyperbole -- until I watched the video and read the transcript of the Sharpton interview.  The 60 Minutes segment was aired on May 19, 2011, and chronicles what it calls Sharpton's "metamorphosis: today he's down right tame. So much so, that he has made his way into the establishment."  It includes this:

Sharpton told us that having a black president is a challenge: if he finds fault with Mr. Obama, he'd be aiding those who want to destroy him. So he has decided not to criticize the president about anything -- even about black unemployment, which is twice the national rate.

The segment also described Sharpton as "now a trusted White House adviser" and recounts that "given his loyalty and his change from confrontational to accommodating, the administration is rewarding him with access and assignments."

How can a media outlet such as MSNBC that purports to be presenting political journalism possibly employ someone as a journalist -- even an opinion journalist -- who publicly and categorically pledges never to criticize the President of the United States under any circumstances?  That would be like hiring a physician who vows never to treat any diseases, or employing an auto mechanic who pledges never to fix any cars, or retaining a pollster who swears never to make any findings about public opinion.  Holding people in political power accountable is the prime function -- the defining feature -- of a journalist, including a pundit; if you expressly and publicly vow never to do that, how can you possibly be credibly presented as being one?  And how can the political analysis of someone who takes this pledge possibly be trusted as sincerely held, let alone accurate?  Note that this vow was not from three years ago; it was from two months ago.

There's an ongoing battle going on over at the Great Orange Satan about how much to criticize Barack Obama. And even here, I see comments every now and then telling me to STFU about Obama, that to criticize Obama is to want Mitt Romney to be president (speaking of not being able to hold two thoughts in one's head at the same time). But when we are seeing play out before our very eyes what happens when people put rigid ideology (and in the case of criticism of Obama, keeping one's mouth shut isn't even about ideology) or party loyalty ahead of the national good, it's difficult to justify keeping silent while President Obama time after time proceeds to blow whatever chance he had at being the transformational leader he could have been. It does the nation no favors, and in Al Sharpton's case, it taints whatever journalistic cred he's trying to build.

So here is MSNBC, a network that's established a niche, that can even point to the high morning ratings of Joey What Happened To Lori Klausutis as showing diverse points of view and Andrea Mitchell and Chris Matthews as the faces of "traditional journalism", that genuinely CAN be described as "fair and balanced" for the most part, getting rid of some of its most formidable talent for speaking too much to power and replacing one of them with a guy who has steamer trunks of credibility-tainting baggage.

It makes me wonder if Sharpton was hired specifically so that if he doesn't get Cenk's ratings, it will be deemed an excuse to abandon its even vaguely left-of-lunatic-right leanings and again try the "Let's Be Like Fox" tactic.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Anonymous Anonymous said...
That one had me scratching my head as well. Al is shifty and has street smarts but is not in any way capable of being on the first team at that level. I too remember Tawana Brawley and how Al gave a bad name to demagoguery. People's lives were ruined because he wanted to get his name out there. A cause, any cause will bring him faster than flies to excrement. Maddow and O'Donnel are excellent but Al is painful to watch.

Blogger Jill said...
Actually, Anon, the whole purpose of the post started out to be a plea for Melissa Harris-Perry to have, or at least share, that 6 PM spot. She's been subbing for Rachel this week and doing a great job. But somehow I never got there in the post; other things took over.

Anonymous mandt said...
MSNBC is a GE corporate tool and their lineup of fake liberals a joke----particularly Rachel Maddow, whose chirrpy head-girl routine is getting beyond stale. Obots are easily hackled and do not except any criticism of Hopey Changey. Barbara Obrien's 'progressive' blog Magablog is typical.

Blogger Pangolin said...
The pretense that the Democrats have equal access to the media has to be maintained but it also has to be kept a pretense.

You will NEVER see unabashed progressives commenting on a prime-time news show. Like Cenk, they get fired or pushed out.

The 2000 and 2004 presidential elections were clearly stolen and there's evidence that the 2008 democratic primaries were tampered with.

We only pretend we live in a free country.

Blogger Ramonas Voices said...
I have to admit I was never a Cenk fan. There is a kind of snarky teen-age bombast about him that turned me off. But I'm old enough to be his grandmother so it may just be a generational thing.

Lawrence's lecturing can get tiresome, but I like the inside stuff I get from him. He worked in the senate for years and understands the dynamics there better than anybody else reporting on Washington.

Tweety still can't keep his mouth shut when his guests are trying to talk, but I'm liking his abject hatred for the lying Tea Party mob.

I really can't watch Sharpton for long, not so much because of what he says but how he says it. He's shouting from the pulpit, e-n-u-n-c-i-a-t-i-n-g e-v-e-r-y w-o-r-d, until I want to scream.

But unless there's breaking non-political news of major importance, I'm usually watching MSNBC.

And you've got my vote for Melissa Harris Perry. She was superb this week.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
This is an updated list of President Obama's achievements that may be of some use. http://pleasecutthecrap.typepad.com/main/what-has-obama-done-since-january-20-2009.html

Anonymous fourmorewars (misteraleinlb@yahoo.com) said...
Not a fan of Sharpton (although, am I not, really? His push-back-y speech at the playing-it-too-safe '04 convention I much admired). But isn't that last paragraph a little unfair, absent at least a small gathering of anecdotes that show him stretching the truth, over his tenure as an MSNBC sub, half as many times as the avg. Foxbot does in the course of your avg. hour?

Sidenote: mandt, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Rachel, apart from being as brilliant a political pundit as anyone I've ever seen, has NEVER been shy about taking the role of gentle, or edging-toward-not-so=gentle, chider of this administration. You're mistaking urbane, subtle remonstration for some kind of brainless cheerleading. Or maybe you're just full of shit.

Blogger Ramonas Voices said...
Wow, I forgot to mention Rachel! She is brilliant at what she does. She's the best thing on opinion TV, ever. She does her homework and rarely makes a mistake. If she does, she's on the next night fixing it and apologizing for it. She has a crack staff working with her, and she makes the most mundane or esoteric stuff entertaining. I've been around a long time, but I learn from her and appreciate her efforts. She's a "can't miss" at our house.

And yes, anyone who has listened to her knows she holds Obama's feet to the fire consistently. She does it with the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. No hyperbole there.

Anonymous mandt said...
Sidenote: MandT would be the first to acknowledge that fetishist propaganda trolls are no doubt experts on shit and projection.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Ha ha, you said "taint."