"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, November 14, 2010

Your Liberal Media
Posted by Jill | 11:51 AM
Here in northern NJ, the newspaper of record is named, appropriately, The Record. This paper takes a fair amount of heat from the Usual Suspect for its "liberal bias", which translates to "not marching in lockstep with Republicans."

My part of Bergen County falls into New Jersey's fifth Congressional district. This district sits like a hat on top of New Jersey, encompassing the bedroom communities of Outer Whitelandia, and the more rural parts of Sussex and Warren Counties, or as those parts are known in some circles, "out where they marry their sisters."

The Fifth District was represented in the House for 25 years by Marge Roukema, an Olympia Snowe-type moderate Republican, more-or-less fiscally conservative but with a laissez-faire attitude towards social. You know, the kind that the Tea Partiers are trying to expunge from the party. In 2002, after running against Roukema twice in the Republican primary and coming dangerously close in 2000, Garrett finally won the seat after Roukema retired. Garrett is a Trojan Horse of a Congressman, making regular use of his franking privileges to send campaign-style letters to his constituents while consistently voting against programs that would help his district. To Scott Garrett, ideology trumps all.

A series of progressively weaker candidates has run against Garrett each year -- weak because the troubled Bergen County Democratic Organization, which has yet to recover from decades of corrupt leadership, refuses to put any skin in the game. The national Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee refuses to even acknowledge that the district exists. So every two years, we're left with someone no one has ever heard of, trying to win a Congressional seat with five figures worth of cash and a small army of mostly college-age volunteers.

This year The Record endorsed the Democratic candidate, Tod Theise -- a Republican-turned-Democrat from Warren County, who seemed OK except for a troubling tendency to talk about how his faith informs his decision=making. Theise had even less money than other candidates, and the newspaper's endorsement didn't buy him uch.

Three weeks before the general election, after endorsing Garrett's opponent, the paper delivered on its front page a journalistic blowjob to Scott Garrett, titled "GOP Outsider finally in vogue". Yes, that old Scott Garrett -- ahead of his time.

Today, almost two weeks AFTER the election, the paper's Washington correspondent, who wrote the puff piece before the election, pens a front-page story that might have been helpful for voters to have BEFORE the election about Garrett's questionable campaign finance relationship with a large hedge fund in Georgia:
Twelve donors tied to one of the nation’s biggest hedge funds contributed more than $150,000 to a political committee in Georgia controlled by Rep. Scott Garrett, the North Jersey Republican likely to have increased power over financial regulations next year.

The Scott Garrett Victory Committee was created in July and registered in Athens, Ga. In August and September, the donations came in from employees, or spouses of employees, of Elliot Management Corp., manager of a $17 billion hedge fund that specializes in distressed debt.

Two of the donors gave more than $35,000 each. That’s far above the limit of $2,400 per election that individuals could give to candidates, but the contributions were legal because the Garrett committee was a joint entity with several other political action committees, including the National Republican Congressional Committee, which has much higher limits.

Garrett transferred less than $10,000 of those contributions to the campaign fund for his own reelection race, which he won with 65 percent of the vote on Nov. 2. Nearly all of the rest — 83 percent of the money raised — went to the NRCC to maintain or expand Garrett’s influence with fellow House members, or to Republican candidates and committees in Garrett’s district and around New Jersey.

When a Democrat does this, it's called "bribery" or "influence-peddling." When a Republican does it, everyone looks the other way. Yes, I wrote to the paper about it. We'll see if they publish it this time.

Labels: , ,

0 comments
Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 04, 2010

It's not a cost, it's rainbows and puppies -- because Rand Paul says so
Posted by Jill | 5:16 AM
These people truly ARE delusional:
This morning, on Fox News Sunday, Paul said that his focus in the Senate would be reducing the “mountains and mountains of debt.” But when asked to square that with his desire to spend trillions of dollars on tax cuts, he replied that, when it comes to extending Bush’s tax cuts, “I’m not seeing it as a cost to government”:

Q: You said at the very beginning, the first issue you mention was the national debt. If you’re so concerned about the national debt, how are you going to pay for a $4 trillion loss of revenue from the tax cuts.

PAUL: I think, first of all you look at whose money it is. It’s the people’s money, who earned the money; we give up some to pay taxes, so I’m not seeing it as a cost to government.


Watch it:


Paul later promised to “introduce legislation that will reduce spending,” but when Fox News’ Chris Wallace noted “there’s no way you’re going to get $4 trillion by spending cuts,” Paul simply reiterated that he would cut spending without laying out any specifics.

Of course not. Because if he laid out any specifics, no one in his/her right mind would vote for this clown. Those who want to know what the magical candyland envisioned by teabaggers would look like need look no further than Ernie Scott Garrett, who represents New Jersey's Fifth Congressional District, which is alas the one in which I live. Garrett in just one week voted AGAINST a fund to benefit those workers who risked their health in the Ground Zero cleanup; voted AGAINST imposing import tariffs on nations that deliberately devalue their currency to increase sales in the US; and voted AGAINST funding NASA's space shuttle and International Space Station programs. That's just last week. Here's his record for all of 2010, and he's been at this since January of 2003. Appropriations for HUD and the Department of Transportation? No dice. Amending the IRS Code of 1986 to create jobs through increased investment in infrastructure and eliminate loopholes which encourage companies to move operations offshore? No dice. Unemployment compensation extension for the unemployed in his district? Uh-uh. Flood insurance reform? Nope -- not even when a good chunk of his district got deluged last week. No on supplemental appropriations for disaster relief. No on the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009.

No and no and no and no and no.

But when it comes to lobbyists, even those from governments known to be sponsors of international terrorism, being barred from donating to political campaigns (including his)? He refused to make a commitment on that one and didn't even show up.

Soctt Garrett was teabag before tea was the flavor of the moment. We here in NJ-5 have already seen what Rand Paul's America looks like, we've been looking at it for nearly a decade. And what's tragic is that most people in this district aren't even paying attention.

Labels: ,

1 comments
Bookmark and Share