"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Thursday, November 03, 2011

Blogrolling In Our Time
Posted by Jill | 5:32 AM
Say hello to Fukushima Diary. Then go read what is going on at Fukushima these days. It's bad, and you'll never hear about it on the news here.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 17, 2011

But the only stories deemed newsworthy by our media are Anthony Weiner's weiner and Dead White Child
Posted by Jill | 5:05 AM
The other day the lead stories on Good Morning America were:

1) Anthony Weiner's weiner
2) Candy Spelling's mansion
3) The Casey Anthony trial

So now the media and the Democrats have gotten the scalp they wanted and Anthony Weiner has resigned...but last night Chris Matthews insisted on devoting most of his show to this faux "scandal" anyway. At least now we know that the whole thing was just because the media's sole reason for being is becuase they like to make dick jokes. Maybe Trey Parker and Matt Stone really ARE America's greatest humorists after all. So if Mr. Weiner expects the whole thing to go away now that he's capitulated and left Congress, he'd better guess again. Because nothing gets in the way of print and broadcast media people with the sexual maturit of a nine-year-old and their weiner jokes.

But in the news that is actual news and ISN'T being covered, there's this:
A fire in Nebraska's Fort Calhoun nuclear power plant briefly knocked out the cooling process for spent nuclear fuel rods, ProPublica reports.

The fire occurred on June 7th, and knocked out cooling for approximately 90 minutes. After 88 hours, the cooling pool would boil dry and highly radioactive materials would be exposed.

On June 6th, the Federal Administration Aviation (FAA) issued a directive banning aircraft from entering the airspace within a two-mile radius of the plant.

"No pilots may operate an aircraft in the areas covered by this NOTAM," referring to the "notice to airmen," effective immediately.

Since last week, the plant has been under a "notification of unusual event" classification, becausing of the rising Missouri River. That is the lowest level of emergency alert.

The OPPD claims the FAA closed airspace over the plant because of the Missouri River flooding. But the FAA ban specifically lists the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant as the location for the flight ban.

The plant is adjacent to the now-flooding river, about 20 minutes outside downtown Omaha, and has been closed since April for refueling.

WOWT, the local NBC affiliate, reports on its website:

"The Ft. Calhoun Nuclear Facility is an island right now but it is one that authorities say is going to stay dry. They say they have a number of redundant features to protect the facility from flood waters that include the aqua dam, earthen berms and sandbags."

OPPD spokesman Jeff Hanson told Business Insider that the nuclear plant is in a "stable situation." He said the Missouri River is currently at 1005.6" above sea level, and that no radioactive fuel had yet been released or was expected to be released in the future.

Asked about the FAA flight ban, Hanson it was due to high power lines and "security reasons that we can't reveal." He said the flight ban remains in effect.

Sandbags and berms -- and a wing and a prayer. That is a nuclear plant right here at home. Oh, and by the way, you haven't heard a peep about the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, lately, have you? After all, what is a nuclear plant meltdown in terms of newsworthiness compared to a Congressman's salacious tweets? But here's what's going on there, in news the media refuses to cover because they'd so much rather just titillate:

Gov't to designate new evacuation spots near Fukushima plant


Tech companies to begin cleaning water at Japan nuclear plants (Sorry, but I just don't buy that nuclear waste can be turned into glass and that we won't see it in food containers in a store near you.)

Radiation "hotspots" hinder Japan response to nuclear crisis

Radioactive caesium found in whales

Greenpeace finds radioactive sea life off Japan

But hey...Anthony Weiner sent naked photos!

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, May 29, 2011

In non-Sarah Palin-related news...
Posted by Jill | 11:49 AM
Meanwhile, in news NOT related to Sarah Palin's bus tour (and there is some, though you'd never know it from the teevee), Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant may be in more trouble:
Officials from the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) are apologizing in advance for the fact that the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant is not ready for the high winds and heavy rain of Typhoon Songda, a massive storm that could make landfall in Japan as early as Monday.

The BBC quotes a TEPCO official as saying, "We have made utmost efforts, but we have not completed covering the damaged reactor buildings. We apologize for the lack of significant measures against wind and rain."

Buildings housing the plant's nuclear reactors are still standing open in the wake of crippling hydrogen explosions that followed Japan's March 11 earthquake and tsunami. The approaching storm could scatter highly radioactive materials into the air and sea. Plant operators are currently spreading "anti-scattering agents" around the buildings housing reactors one and four.

I don't know about you, but my days of eating wild Pacific salmon are over.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Monday, April 11, 2011

FUBAR.
Posted by Jill | 9:18 PM
Not a surprise, but a shock nonetheless:
The Japanese government's nuclear safety agency has decided to raise the crisis level of the Fukushima Daiichi power plant accident from 5 to 7, the worst on the international scale.

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency made the decision on Monday. It says the damaged facilities have been releasing a massive amount of radioactive substances, which are posing a threat to human health and the environment over a wide area.

The agency used the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, or INES, to gauge the level. The scale was designed by an international group of experts to indicate the significance of nuclear events with ratings of 0 to 7.

On March 18th, one week after the massive quake, the agency declared the Fukushima trouble a level 5 incident, the same as the accident at Three Mile Island in the United States in 1979.

Level 7 has formerly only been applied to the Chernobyl accident in the former Soviet Union in 1986 when hundreds of thousands of terabecquerels of radioactive iodine-131 were released into the air. One terabecquerel is one trillion becquerels.


I have colleagues in Osaka. The distance from Osaka to Fukushima as the crow flies is 332.18 miles. That's a little less than the distance from my house to Richmond, Virginia.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, March 19, 2011

For the media, nuclear catastrophe cannot hope to compete with a Muslim boogeyman
Posted by Jill | 8:20 AM
Isn't it peculiar how our news media cannot seem to cover two major news stories at once? Besides, how can nuclear catastrophe, which is SO last week, hope to compete with the latest Muslim boogeyman-du-jour? Especially when one thing makes General Electric look really, really bad, and the other, in the context of a revived so-called war on terror, stands to make the company (a major defense contractor) a whole bunch of money.

So while the talking heads of the news have been diverted to the shiny new bauble of an expanded war in the middle east, we are starting to learn just how bad the disaster at the Fukushima nuclear plant really is (photos can be seen at linked article):

Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency admitted that the disaster was a level 5, which is classified as a crisis causing 'several radiation deaths' by the UN International Atomic Energy.

Officials said the rating was raised after they realised the full extent of the radiation leaking from the plant. They also said that 3 per cent of the fuel in three of the reactors at the Fukushima plant had been severely damaged, suggesting those reactor cores have partially melted down.

After Tokyo Electric Power Company Managing Director Akio Komiri cried as he left a conference to brief journalists on the situation at Fukushima, a senior Japanese minister also admitted that the country was overwhelmed by the scale of the tsunami and nuclear crisis.

He said officials should have admitted earlier how serious the radiation leaks were.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano said: 'The unprecedented scale of the earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan, frankly speaking, were among many things that happened that had not been anticipated under our disaster management contingency plans.

'In hindsight, we could have moved a little quicker in assessing the situation and coordinating all that information and provided it faster.'

Nuclear experts have been saying for days that Japan was underplaying the crisis' severity.

It is now officially on a par with the Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania in 1979. Only the explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 has topped the scale.

Deputy director general of the NISA, Hideohiko Nishiyama, also admitted that they do not know if the reactors are coming under control.

[snip]

Meanwhile, workers at the devastated power station are continuing their desperate battle to prevent a complete meltdown which some fear could be as bad as Chernobyl.

The latest pictures show a whole wall missing from the building housing reactor number four. Inside, a green crane normally used to move spent fuel rods into the storage pool can be seen. Underneath the crane, but not seen in the picture, is the 45ft-deep spent fuel storage pool which has boiled dry.

Officials at Fukushima are rapidly running out of options to halt the crisis. Military trucks are spraying the reactors for a second days with tons of water arcing over the facility.

Engineers are trying to get the coolant pumping systems knocked out by the tsunami working again after laying a new power line from the main grid.

And they today admitted that burying reactors under sand and concrete - the solution adopted in Chernobyl - may be the only option to stop a catastrophic radiation release.

It was the first time the facility operator had acknowledged burying the sprawling 40-year-old complex was possible, a sign that piecemeal actions such as dumping water from military helicopters or scrambling to restart cooling pumps may not work.

'It is not impossible to encase the reactors in concrete. But our priority right now is to try and cool them down first,' an official from the plant operator, Tokyo Electric Power Co, told a news conference.

But some experts warned that even the concrete solution was not without risks.

'It's just not that easy,' Murray Jennex, a professor at San Diego State University in California, said when asked about the so-called Chernobyl option for dealing with damaged reactors, named after the Ukrainian nuclear plant that exploded in 1986.


And for those who claim that people exposed to radiation at Chernobyl were not harmed because they weren't fried instantly, there's this:
The risk of thyroid cancer among people who were exposed as children to the nuclear fallout at Chernobyl has not declined nearly 25 years after the disaster, said a study released on Thursday in the United States.

The National Institutes of Health-led study examined more than 12,500 people who were under 18 at the time of the Chernobyl accident on April 26, 1986, and who lived near the accident site in one of three parts of Ukraine.

Each person's thyroid radioactivity levels were measured within two months of the accident, and they were screened for thyroid cancer four times, beginning as early as 12 years after the disaster and continuing for 10 years.

Sixty-five of those in the study were diagnosed with thyroid cancer.

When researchers examined the cancer risk in relation to how much exposure to radioactive iodine-131 (I-131) each person received, they found a two-fold increase for each additional gray, an international unit of absorbed radiation.

“The researchers found no evidence, during the study time period, to indicate that the increased cancer risk to those who lived in the area at the time of the accident is decreasing over time,” said the study.

Overall, the “clear dose-response relationship, in which higher absorption of radiation from I-131 led to an increased risk for thyroid cancer... has not seemed to diminish over time,” it said.


As for the area around the plant itself? Here's what it looks like today.

But where's the sexy story potential of the possibility of a sizable part of the world's third largest economy becoming uninhabitable for generations when compared to the delicious prospect of whipping Peter King into a frenzy over yet another Middle Eastern dictator?

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, March 12, 2011

Still think it's not our problem?
Posted by Jill | 8:36 AM
Hey, folks: The image that I posted here a few days ago, purporting to be from the Australian Radiation Services, appears to be a hoax and so I've removed it. The ARS says it did not produce such a map, and I regret jumping to the gun on this.

However, the BEST scenario right now is a series of controlled releases of radioactive steam over the next weeks or months. The article linked to also notes that radioactive particles have been detected up to sixty miles away from the damaged reactor SO FAR.

As for whether radioactive contamination could reach the US, consider things like global travel and global trade. Consider also that California's two nuclear plants are built near the San Andreas Fault, that there is a 88% chance of a magnitude 6.7 earthquake occurring in California in the next thirty years with a 46% chance of 7.5 or greater -- the maximum intensity that the state's nuclear plants are built to handle.

In all the talk about energy, most of the conversation still revolves around oil, coal, and wind -- three things that can only be harnessed by major corporations and sold. The sun and wind and geothermal energy are there for everyone who can spring for the five figures for the equipment, which makes them unlikely to receive much Federal funding. After all, if it doesn't benefit campaign contributors, our government isn't going to do a thing with it.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Everything is relative
Posted by Jill | 7:25 AM
Awful:




Unfathomable:






I suppose it's easy for me to say, when my house is dry and I do not live near a river that's going to crest at four feet above flood stage today. But for those of us who are dealing with the kinds of suckitude that mark life in 21st century America -- religious witch hunts, unemployment in our families, a lack of jobs and rampant age discrimination in those that are out there, high fuel prices, John Boehner advocating for nuclear power here in the US even as the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan approaches meltdown -- the nightmare unfolding in Japan ought to put our own problems into perspective, at least temporarily.

Because I have work colleagues in Japan (Osaka, not Tokyo), my first thought upon hearing of the earthquake in Japan was for them -- for M., who greets me in e-mail as "Dear Jill-san" and whose charming formality and cheerful demeanor mask a disciplined and detailed mind; for Y., he of the endless patience with the raucous American women he has to deal with regularly, who loves the Yankees and who just got married a few months ago; and for A., who is an avid scuba diver and takes photographs of astonishing beauty. As at turns out, some were in Tokyo for a conference, but managed to get out on the bullet train between the quake and the tsunami. A disaster like this is something we watch on television. Brackish mud and water overflows a neat row of greenhouses that look from the helicopters taking the footage like cigarettes neatly lined up on a table. Our minds simply cannot fathom what is unfolding in front of us. We've seen scenes like this done with CGI any number of times in the movies, but this is no movie. And yet, we watch with a kind of detachment, because such things just don't seem possible. In A Clockwork Orange, Alex says, "It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen" Real disasters play out in real time and we watch them from our living room sofas as spectators. We empathize but can't actually FEEL that it's real.

I'm not sure what there even is to say at this point. I can't recall anything like this ever happening before during my lifetime. It's enough to make you think the 2012 kooks are on to something.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share