"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast" -Oscar Wilde |
"The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself." -- Proverbs 11:25 |
Hours after calling the Obama administration's contraceptives compromise a "first step," the Catholic bishops said Friday night they have "two serious objections" to the new policy and will fight its enactment.First, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said the administration’s plan still includes a “nationwide mandate of insurance coverage of sterilization and contraception, including some abortifacients.”
“This is both unsupported in the law and remains a grave moral concern,” the bishops said in their statement. “We cannot fail to reiterate this, even as so many would focus exclusively on the question of religious liberty.And while President Barack Obama’s new plan allows religious-affiliated employers to refrain from paying for contraceptive coverage — insurers would be obligated to provide the coverage for free — the bishops said the change doesn’t go far enough.
“It would still mandate that all insurers must include coverage for the objectionable services in all the policies they would write,” the bishops said. “At this point, it would appear that self-insuring religious employers, and religious insurance companies, are not exempt from this mandate.”
The bishops said the president’s plan will require “careful moral analysis” and may still change.
But they made it clear that a “lack of clear protection for key stakeholders — for self-insured religious employers; for religious and secular for-profit employers; for secular non-profit employers; for religious insurers; and for individuals — is unacceptable and must be corrected. And in the case where the employee and insurer agree to add the objectionable coverage, that coverage is still provided as a part of the objecting employer's plan, financed in the same way as the rest of the coverage offered by the objecting employer. This, too, raises serious moral concerns.”
A senior administration official told POLITICO on Saturday that the White House didn't expect to win the support of the bishops with Friday's updated policy. Instead, the official said, the administration was focused on achieving a balance of respecting religious beliefs and ensuring women had access to preventive services.
Obama should have just said "No." It's a cave without substance when the majority of the people were already with him.
That has completely taken the wind out of the sails of the issue (which had been growing into a real problem given the opinions of some catholic Dems).
The fact that the bishops and some on the right want to continue the fight is pure gold for us. The country is overwhelmingly behind Obama's position on this, so it is a very big losing issue for the right if they actually pursue it.
Especially if it is framed as them fighting for the right of any employer to deny any employee any coverage simply on the basis of what the employer considers his "morality".
With all the potential lines of attack against Obama that the GOP could be using - if O manages to get them to invest their time pursuing this issue, then he is a political genius. This will be a big win for the forces of light.
Hard to imagine why you cannot see that.
We are witness to the full turgid horror of the Conference of Bishops and the right-wingers whoclaim religious liberty for the church while blithely rolling back women's rights to the 15th century.
Before the American revolution a Quaker visitor to Massachusetts had his ears lopped off for...being a Quaker.
Also today - well just look at the brouhaha over the conversion of an old loft building in Manhattan into a mosque that looks like a loft building, only a block away (although not in sight of) Ground Zero.
Did I mention – nope I guess I didn't – that there was once a street in Greenwich Village named Reason Street after Tom Paine's "The Age Of Reason," one of the books that inspired the American revolution. The street name was changed to Barrow Street after it came out that Tom Paine was a deist, (O, the shame of it!) not an Anglican Protestant.
Nothing has changed except the power of publicity.
Yours very crankily,
The New York Crank