"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, June 08, 2008

The Test of the 50-State Strategy
Posted by Jill | 11:51 AM
When Howard Dean became the head of the Democratic National Committee, he was committed to implementing his presidential campaign's 50-state strategy as the party's policy, upending the Terry McAuliffe method of only fighting districts that were guaranteed wins.

The McAuliffe path, which was followed by Hillary Clinton, has always had a subtext of "We can't get to these people, so why try?". Instead of asking WHY the so-called "Reagan Democrats" vote against their own interests time after time, when a progressive message of opportunity and a strong middle class ought to appeal to them, the Democratic Party took the easy way out -- running to the right and refusing to contest states that have in recent decades voted Republican. But there's an admission of weakness in claiming that your policies can't be sold to a significant chunk of the population -- a weakness that Republicans have exploited.

Howard Dean and Joe Trippi (and others) may have come up with the 50-state strategy, but it was not for them to reap the reward. It was for them to lay the groundwork to allow someone else to do so. What up-and-coming political staffers learned from 2004, they are applying to 2008 in working with Barack Obama. And it looks like they are up to the task:

Senator Barack Obama’s general election plan calls for broadening the electoral map by challenging Senator John McCain in typically Republican states — from North Carolina to Missouri to Montana — as Mr. Obama seeks to take advantage of voter turnout operations built in nearly 50 states in the long Democratic nomination battle, aides said.

On Monday, Mr. Obama will travel to North Carolina — a state that has not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate in 32 years — to start a two-week tour of speeches, town hall forums and other appearances intended to highlight differences with Mr. McCain on the economy. From there, he heads to Missouri, which last voted for a Democrat in 1996. His first campaign swing after securing the Democratic presidential nomination last week was to Virginia, which last voted Democratic in 1964.

With Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton now having formally bowed out of the race and thrown her backing to him, Mr. Obama wants to define the faltering economy as the paramount issue facing the country, a task probably made easier by ever-rising gasoline prices and the sharp rise in unemployment the government reported on Friday. Mr. McCain, by contrast, has been emphasizing national security more than any other issue and has made clear that he would like to fight the election primarily on that ground.

Mr. Obama has moved in recent days to transform his primary organization into a general election machine, hiring staff members, sending organizers into important states and preparing a television advertisement campaign to present his views and his biography to millions of Americans who followed the primaries from a distance.

In one telling example, he is moving to hire Aaron Pickrell, the chief political strategist of Gov. Ted Strickland of Ohio — who helped steer Mrs. Clinton to victory in that state’s primary — to run his effort against Mr. McCain there. In another, aides said, he has tapped Dan Carroll, an opposition researcher who gained fame digging up information on opponents’ records for Bill Clinton in 1992, to help gather information about Mr. McCain. That is the latest evidence that, for all the talk on both sides about a new kind of politics, the general election campaign is likely to be bloody.

Mr. Obama’s campaign is considering hiring Patti Solis Doyle, a longtime associate of Mrs. Clinton who was her campaign manager until a shake-up in February, the first of what Mr. Obama’s aides said would be a number of hires from the Clinton campaign.

Recognizing the extent to which Republicans view Michelle Obama’s strong views and personality as a potential liability for her husband, Mr. Obama’s aides said they were preparing to bring aboard senior operatives from previous Democratic presidential campaigns to work with her, a clear departure from the typical way the spouse of a candidate is staffed. Mrs. Obama’s operation would include senior aides devoted to responding to attacks and challenges to her, particularly if she continues to campaign as much as she has so far.

To counter persistent rumors and mischaracterizations about his background, Mr. Obama’s advisers said they would also begin using television advertising and speeches in a biographical campaign to present his story on his terms. But they suggested that their research had found that voters were not that well acquainted with Mr. McCain, either, signaling that the next few months will see a scramble by the two campaigns to define the rival candidate.

“Even though Senator McCain has been on the scene for three decades, there are a lot of people who don’t know a lot about him — and there are a lot of people who don’t know about us,” said David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s senior strategist. “Both campaigns are about to begin filling in the gaps.”

Mr. Obama has sought in recent weeks to deal pre-emptively with issues that shadowed him in the primary and on which Mr. McCain has already challenged him. At a speech to Jewish leaders in Washington, he markedly toughened his statements about how he would deal with Iran after coming under attack for his pledge to meet with its leader; he now almost always wears an American flag pin on his lapel after Republicans sought to raise questions about his patriotism by pointing to the absence of one.

While the lengthy, contentious Democratic primary fight against Mrs. Clinton exposed vulnerabilities in Mr. Obama that the Republicans will no doubt seek to exploit, it also allowed him to build a nearly nationwide network of volunteers and professional organizers. While early assertions by presidential campaigns that they intend to expand the playing field are often little more than feints intended to force opponents to spend time and money defending states that they should have locked up, Mr. Obama’s fund-raising success gives his campaign more flexibility than most to play in more places.

Mr. Obama’s aides said some states where they intend to campaign — like Georgia, Missouri, Montana and North Carolina — might ultimately be too red to turn blue. But the result of making an effort there could force Mr. McCain to spend money or send him to campaign in what should be safe ground, rather than using those resources in states like Ohio.

Mr. Obama’s campaign manager, David Plouffe, said that the primary contest had left the campaign with strong get-out-the-vote operations in Republican states that were small enough that better-than-usual turnout could make a difference in the general election. Among those he pointed to was Alaska, which last voted for a Democrat in 1964.

“Do we have to win any of those to get to 270?” Mr. Plouffe said, referring to the number of electoral votes needed to win the election. “No. Do we have reason to think we can be competitive there? Yes. Do we have organizations in those states to be competitive? Yes. This is where the primary was really helpful to us now.”

Mr. Plouffe also pointed to Oregon and Washington, states that have traditionally been competitive and where Mr. Obama defeated Mrs. Clinton, as places the campaign could have significant advantages .

Still, the Republican Party has a history of out-hustling and out-organizing the Democratic Party in national elections. The question is whether the more organically grown game plans that carried Mr. Obama to victory in Democratic primaries and caucuses can match the well-oiled organizations Republicans have put together.


This is not a campaign that's going to be blindsided by anything, the way the 2004 Kerry campaign was by the Swift Boat Liars. It's actually to the good that the racist e-mails and the hysteria of Sean Hannity and talk of the mythican "Whitey tape" have started so early. This campaign knows how the Republicans are going to run. It's one thing to be a Senator of several decades, married to a wealthy wife, with an impeccable war record. It's easy to see how Kerry could have had false confidence that he was impervious to whatever crap the Republicans would throw at him. But Barack Obama, who has been surrounded by Secret Service agents since early on in his campaign as a result of death threats, has no illusions about what's coming. He knows, his campaign knows, and now a unified party has his back.

So go ahead, you racist, ugly, mean-spirited Republican bastards; sling your shit. We're ready for you.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
6 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...
So go ahead, you racist, ugly, mean-spirited Republican bastards; sling your shit. We're ready for you.

Yeah! Bring it on! Let's fight them over there, so we don't have to fight them here!

Err, umm, never mind.

Blogger Jennifer Briney said...
You left one factor out: election fraud. It happened in 2000, was worse in 2004, and there has been no justice or oversight (mainly because the Justice Department is now 100% full of "loyal Bushies"). Fraud is going to be a factor, possibly a big one, and Obama will need to get a big enough turnout to overwhelm the votes that will be lost.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Somehing worthwhile to ask for once among such among the weird and unwholesome questioning the Loyalties and True Patriot Love of Barack Obama.

Which amounts to common sense, does it not?

Blogger Bob said...
Obama said back in January, "Watch how I manage my campaign." Which was his challenge to those doubting his executive experience.

He understood that his goal was to win enough delegates & the nomination, not to prove he could defeat Hillary in every Dem demographic. He understood that so-called "Reagan Democrats" are unreliable Democrats, & that he didn't need a majority of them for the nomination, so he could go back to work on them in the general campaign when he was competing with a Repug, not a Democrat. I'm intrigued by how Obama believes he can win. This guy is not John Kerry.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Amen.

Now, of course I have concerns about voting fraud, and allegations of "voter" fraud (I just deleted enough stuff about that to write a post). Frankly, I think that is why President Bush seemed so contrite directly after the 2006 elections: if there really was the fraud many people think there was, then there were also enough D votes to overcome the Diebold boxes, there must have been an overwhelming margin of victory.

Blogger jurassicpork said...
Obama's more ambitious. He has a 57 state strategy.