"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Monday, June 09, 2008

OK, so how do we get these people to realize that John McCain is not going to make their lives any better?
Posted by Jill | 6:24 AM
Last night I posted my favorite clip from Blazing Saddles, and it's tempting to post it again today, but I'm not going to. Because while it's a lot more fun to ridicule people who keep voting for people who screw them over every time as idiots, this year the stakes are so high that we need to find out WHY they keep doing this, and what we can do to reach them -- because they are bearing the brunt of the deliberate strategy of the Bush Administration's and the petroleum industry cabal of producers and traders to turn this country into a land of the disgustingly rich and the grindingly poor:

Across broad swaths of the South, Southwest and the upper Great Plains, the combination of low incomes, high gas prices and heavy dependence on pickup trucks and vans is putting an even tighter squeeze on family budgets.

Here in the Mississippi Delta, some farm workers are borrowing money from their bosses so they can fill their tanks and get to work. Some are switching jobs for shorter commutes.

People are giving up meat so they can buy fuel. Gasoline theft is rising. And drivers are running out of gas more often, leaving their cars by the side of the road until they can scrape together gas money.

The disparity between rural America and the rest of the country is a matter of simple home economics. Nationwide, Americans are now spending about 4 percent of their take-home income on gasoline. By contrast, in some counties in the Mississippi Delta, that figure has surpassed 13 percent.

As a result, gasoline expenses are rivaling what families spend on food and housing.

“This crisis really impacts those who are at the economic margins of society, mostly in the rural areas and particularly parts of the Southeast,” said Fred Rozell, retail pricing director at the Oil Price Information Service, a fuel analysis firm. “These are people who have to decide between food and transportation.”

A survey by Mr. Rozell’s firm late last month found that the gasoline crisis is taking the highest toll, as a percentage of income, on people in rural areas of the South, New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming and North and South Dakota.

With the exception of rural Maine, the Northeast appears least affected by gasoline prices because people there make more money and drive shorter distances, or they take a bus or train to work.

But across Mississippi and the rural South, little public transit is available and people have no choice but to drive to work. Since jobs are scarce, commutes are frequently 20 miles or more. Many of the vehicles on the roads here are old rundown trucks, some getting 10 or fewer miles to the gallon.

The survey showed that of the 13 counties where people spent 13 percent or more of their family income on gasoline, 5 were located in Mississippi, 4 were in Alabama, 3 were in Kentucky and 1 was in West Virginia.


How about that -- the counties where people spend over 10% of their income now on gasoline are located in the most reliable Republican-voting states in the country. You wonder why they keep doing it. And it's the job of the Democratic Party to find out why -- and convince them that while changing the way they've always voted may seem scary, their future under John McCain is going to be far worse than anything they can imagine under Barack Obama.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
3 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Jill,
You obviously haven't spent much time in the South. Else, you wouldn't ask this question.
[I grew up in "the south" and have spent many years working in portions of the "new south -- mostly Georgia. It ain't changed that much. There are pockets of "modern", but overall I don't detect that much difference. And the further you get from "the city" the more it remains the same ole same ole!]

I need not remind you that Mississippi and its neighbors consistently place in the bottom five states in all things "progressive", including especially educational attainment. They all do a very good job competing for wages with Mexico.

Those people have spent their ENTIRE lives, and back generations, putting down the "black man". He is the definition of 'evil'. Asking these poor -- in so many ways -- people to suddenly decide that black is white and education is good is going way too far. Especially when there are so many other things -- the things you mentioned plus so many others -- that are of such immediate concern to them....

But at an entirely different level, you could ask why women stay with abusive men. I've always figured it was because they were taught that men were like that and it will never change...

Likewise our poor Mississippian: It's always been that way. They've always been at the bottom and nothing they can do will change it... And as long as their overlords keep telling them that.....

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Good projection Ted

Anonymous Anonymous said...
I suspect the big western state drivers actually have greater distances to drive, but they also make more income.

The South is full of right-to-work laws, much of Mississippi is a third world nation that'd shock visitors from both coasts, so they will of course pay higher percentages of their meager earnings.

I'm not sure why they don't tie the politics to their personal economics there, but lousy education systems and fundie religionists may be part and parcel of the foundation that deflects political heat to simplistic anger at Big Oil.