"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, April 27, 2008

This is the correct way to answer horseshit questions
Posted by Jill | 2:05 PM




THIS is the guy they're painting as the elitist? What about the guy who won't release his $100 million wife's tax returns because their finances are 100% totally, utterly separate, but he's using her corporate jet?

Meanwhile, the woman who in a sane world would be hale and hearty and SHE would be the first woman president, had some things to say about the coverage of the Democrats:

The problem today unfortunately is that voters who take their responsibility to be informed seriously enough to search out information about the candidates are finding it harder and harder to do so, particularly if they do not have access to the Internet.

Did you, for example, ever know a single fact about Joe Biden’s health care plan? Anything at all? But let me guess, you know Barack Obama’s bowling score. We are choosing a president, the next leader of the free world. We are not buying soap, and we are not choosing a court clerk with primarily administrative duties.

What’s more, the news media cut candidates like Joe Biden out of the process even before they got started. Just to be clear: I’m not talking about my husband. I’m referring to other worthy Democratic contenders. Few people even had the chance to find out about Joe Biden’s health care plan before he was literally forced from the race by the news blackout that depressed his poll numbers, which in turn depressed his fund-raising.

And it’s not as if people didn’t want this information. In focus groups that I attended or followed after debates, Joe Biden would regularly be the object of praise and interest: “I want to know more about Senator Biden,” participants would say.

But it was not to be. Indeed, the Biden campaign was covered more for its missteps than anything else. Chris Dodd, also a serious candidate with a distinguished record, received much the same treatment. I suspect that there was more coverage of the burglary at his campaign office in Hartford than of any other single event during his run other than his entering and leaving the campaign.

Who is responsible for the veil of silence over Senator Biden? Or Senator Dodd? Or Gov. Tom Vilsack? Or Senator Sam Brownback on the Republican side?

The decision was probably made by the same people who decided that Fred Thompson was a serious candidate. Articles purporting to be news spent thousands upon thousands of words contemplating whether he would enter the race, to the point that before he even entered, he was running second in the national polls for the Republican nomination. Second place! And he had not done or said anything that would allow anyone to conclude he was a serious candidate. A major weekly news magazine put Mr. Thompson on its cover, asking — honestly! — whether the absence of a serious campaign and commitment to raising money or getting his policies out was itself a strategy.

[snip]

Watching the campaign unfold, I saw how the press gravitated toward a narrative template for the campaign, searching out characters as if for a novel: on one side, a self-described 9/11 hero with a colorful personal life, a former senator who had played a president in the movies, a genuine war hero with a stunning wife and an intriguing temperament, and a handsome governor with a beautiful family and a high school sweetheart as his bride. And on the other side, a senator who had been first lady, a young African-American senator with an Ivy League diploma, a Hispanic governor with a self-deprecating sense of humor and even a former senator from the South standing loyally beside his ill wife. Issues that could make a difference in the lives of Americans didn’t fit into the narrative template and, therefore, took a back seat to these superficialities.

[snip]

News is different from other programming on television or other content in print. It is essential to an informed electorate. And an informed electorate is essential to freedom itself. But as long as corporations to which news gathering is not the primary source of income or expertise get to decide what information about the candidates “sells,” we are not functioning as well as we could if we had the engaged, skeptical press we deserve.

And the future of news is not bright. Indeed, we’ve heard that CBS may cut its news division, and media consolidation is leading to one-size-fits-all journalism. The state of political campaigning is no better: without a press to push them, candidates whose proposals are not workable avoid the tough questions. All of this leaves voters uncertain about what approach makes the most sense for them. Worse still, it gives us permission to ignore issues and concentrate on things that don’t matter. (Look, the press doesn’t even think there is a difference!)

[snip]

If voters want a vibrant, vigorous press, apparently we will have to demand it. Not by screaming out our windows as in the movie “Network” but by talking calmly, repeatedly, constantly in the ears of those in whom we have entrusted this enormous responsibility. Do your job, so we can — as voters — do ours.


And if you have friends like Nash McCabe, a casualty of the Bush economy, who doesn't have a job but worries about Barack Obama not wearing a flag pin because if she can focus on something trivial like that she won't have to worry about what she's going to do if she can't find a job, demand that they look at the real world around them, and base their votes on that, not on ridiculous non-issues cooked up by the press to fill the 24 x 7 news cycle.

Labels:

2 comments
Bookmark and Share
2 Comments:
Blogger adam k. said...
It really is quite sicking to watch the media try to destroy the one candidate left in this race who's not a total bullshit artist. And it's so obvious watching full, unedited clips of him speak that he's real and he's honest and he's trying to do good work. But these clips can be cut into anything you want.

I'm just feeling very powerless and "bitter" about the state of our politics and media culture. What a mess.

My favorite was when Hillary basically admitted to blatantly lying about Bosnia and said "can't we just move on now? it's over, we all make mistakes, just let it go". And then they moved on to the flag pin thing as if it were just as legitimate, if not moreso.

And Barack let her off SO easy, too... he could easily have said "well, Hillary, I personally don't think we need a president who makes those kinds of mistakes" or better yet, "Hillary, you LIED to the American people, that's a legimitate issue" but he completely let her off the hook, cause he's a nice guy.

And what does she do in return? Twists the knife, calls him a pussy, says he can't close the deal. And we're not allowed to call her a bitch, cause that's sexist? Oy.

Her husband's a bitch, too.
4/27/08, 7:21 PM  
Blogger Distributorcap said...
jill
as an associate member of the media

i nominate you to run the place...

there is no more news, just britney and entertainment ---- to keep the masses occupied while the fox is raiding the hen house......

and it is working.
4/28/08, 9:40 PM  
Post a Comment
<< Home