"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast" -Oscar Wilde |
"The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself." -- Proverbs 11:25 |
Catherine Crabill, a homeschooling mom and realtor who says "our Second Amendment rights were to guard against tyranny" and believes that the U.S. government was responsible for the Oklahoma City bombing, is challenging incumbent Republican U.S. Congressman Rob Wittman.
[snip]
When contacted by the Washington Post in 2009, Crabill also defended remarks she made 15 years ago about the Oklahoma City bombing being orchestrated by the U.S. Federal government. Crabill was a member of "a militia known as the New Mexico Citizens Action Association", and had told the Washington Times "this heinous act of violence was the work of our government," which will "use it as an excuse to aggressively attack the growing militia movement across the country."
[snip]
"But Crabill also reiterated her view yesterday that the U.S. government was behind the Oklahoma City bombing, saying her views found support in a report by retired Brig. General Benton K. Pardin arguing that on the April 1995 bombing could not have happened without the assistance of internally placed demolition charges. She said the idea of her own government deliberately killing its citizens seemed farfetched even to her until the tragedy at Waco and the violent confrontation with Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge in the 1990s."It would have been unbelievable if we hadn't seen [former Attorney General] Janet Reno destroy all those innocent people in Waco," Crabill said."
Labels: bigotry, domestic terrorism, militias, right-wing hatemongers
well you know
You are obviously not old enough to remember, or else you would realize how ridiculous these analogies are.
There's another reason they're ridiculous: Mainstream Democrats never, ever, ever lauded anything that these radical organizations said, nor did the media treat them as "justifiably angry people" the way even Chuck Todd is doing with the teabaggers. The violent rhetoric of the teabag movement has been adopted by Republicans including at least one possible Presidential candidate. The entire party is in thrall to these people, unlike what the Democratic did with the radical groups in the 60's, which was to shun them.
At least the radical leftist groups of the 1960's, as misguided and counterproductive as they were, made no secret of their aims to overthrow the government, unlike the teabaggers, who pour gasoline on a fire and then say they didn't intend for the fire to get bigger so they weren't responsible for it.