"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Saturday, January 24, 2009

Dear President Obama:
Posted by Jill | 7:53 AM
I apologize.

There, I said it, which is more than your predecessor did about all of the horrors he perpetrated upon his country.

But you can hardly blame me. After all, look at how ineffectual our party has been for the last eight years. Look at how frightened our party leaders in Congress have been, what with Harry Reid's whining that he doesn't have a majority so he can't try to fight, even if it's just for principle and to get opposition into the public record. Even after the Democrats won the midterm elections in 2006, he whined that he doesn't have a filibuster-proof majority. Never once did he consider that perhaps allowing the Republicans to filibuster everything might be a good idea in painting them as the party of obstruction. Look at what our party, led by YOUR chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, did to Howard Dean in 2004, because Rahmmy believed that John Kerry the war hero would be a better candidate. Do you think Howard Dean would have sat by and let a bunch of chickenhawks call him a wuss? I think not. And now even you have decided that with Dean's strategy having finally reached fruition in getting you to the White House, you've put a guy in charge of the DNC who seems to already be getting wobbly on the 50-state strategy.

And as for you, well, you're the one who had Joe Lieberman as your Senatorial mentor when you first went to Washington. It's all well and good to talk about reaching across the aisle. Tip O'Neill used to do it all the time. But today's Republicans aren't like the Republicans of the 1960's. They've purged as many moderates as they could out of the party, and now it's run by people like John Weepers Boehner and David Diapers Vitter and John Cornyn -- mean-spirited, hypocritical, greedy bastards who seem to truly believe that God has chosen them to purge the country of that pesky middle class. And likely as not, reaching across the aisle to them means you'll pull back a well-gnawed, bloody stump.

So with your history, you can't really blame me for looking at the gestures you made towards the Republicans -- throwing everyone who sweated blood to get you elected under the bus in favor of these assholes and guys like Rick Warren; leaving the Bushite Robert Gates on as Secretary of Defense; talking about compromise with people for whom compromise is a dirty word. Oh, I know there were people at Daily Kos talking about how it was all a head fake, that you knew what you were doing and that you were simply reaching out to the Republicans, knowing full well what they would do, and then after giving them a chance to work with you, you would pummel them into the ground. But let's face it -- there are those over there who were as messianic about you as the Twenty-Seven Percenters STILL are about George W. Bush. And mindless worship is no more attractive or intellegent when it comes from our side.

But ever since noon on Tuesday, it seems that this is no longer just a funny lolphoto:




SOMEONE in our party has needed to do this for a long time:
President Obama warned Republicans on Capitol Hill today that they need to quit listening to radio king Rush Limbaugh if they want to get along with Democrats and the new administration.

"You can't just listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done," he told top GOP leaders, whom he had invited to the White House to discuss his nearly $1 trillion stimulus package.

One White House official confirmed the comment but said he was simply trying to make a larger point about bipartisan efforts.

"There are big things that unify Republicans and Democrats," the official said. "We shouldn't let partisan politics derail what are very important things that need to get done."


Closing Gitmo. Rescinding the global gag rule. A pay freeze on the highest paid staffers. Overturning Bush's sealing of presidential records. Reviewing detainee policy. White House staff ethics pledge. And now saying what has been obvious ever since the Clinton administration, that Republicans should stop taking their marching orders from a drug-addicted radio talk show host?

Somebody pinch me.

Labels:

7 comments
Bookmark and Share
7 Comments:
Blogger Bob said...
Also reversing the Bush rule on providing aid to organizations that include abortion as an option for reproductive choice. This doesn't increase abortion - it'll have the opposite effect, as was proven during the Clinton years. Obama is asserting that he defines the center now, & polls overwhelmingly support that assertion. His voters do not get their views & news from Limbaugh, & even McCain doesn't get his views from Limbaugh.
1/24/09, 11:13 AM  
Blogger D. said...
*pinch*
1/24/09, 12:18 PM  
Blogger Rhode Island Rules said...
Here's the thing. One of the biggest reasons the Dems were soooo ineffective under Bush is that they were spied on. (See Tice, Andrew...NSA whistleblower).

Don't think for a second that Bush and Cheney didn't have something to blackmail most of them with. That's how they keep the GOP in line as well, mostly through threatening to oust the closet cases. Again and again they capitulated. Why? They were scared to death...literally (See Wellstone, Paul)

These are ruthless people who care not about anything but themselves and their own power (not even about the kind of world they will leave their own children and grandchildren). Why do you think so many of the threats against Capitol Hill (anthrax, suspected bombings) came when they were trying to resist?

Don't forget Poppy Bush was long involved with the CIA before becoming its director.

Now, if the Dems didn't have anything to hide....they couldn't be blackmailed, but that's another story.
1/24/09, 6:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...
One of the biggest reasons the Dems were soooo ineffective under Bush is that they were spied on.

Maybe, even probably.

But don't overlook the fact that the Democrats in Congress abdicated their oversight role because they were complicit. Feinstein and Reid are conservatives and authoritarians, and not averse to war and torture. Harman and Pelosi and Rockefeller signed on for the excesses of the War On Terror, and so can't now investigate for fear of discovering themselves.
1/24/09, 7:34 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...
I'm glad you like your new president. So far (although admittedly it's early) I like him too.

That alone is something. For a Chief Executive to get a thumbs-up from you and me both must mean he's doing a pretty damn good job. Or, it could just be that conservatives are by and large not engaging in the 8-year temper tantrum that libs have done since 2000. I don't know. Either way, I like this better. The next 4 to 8 will be interesting.
1/24/09, 8:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Dissent is a temper tantrum, huh?

Congratulations, Barry. You've flunked freshman civics.
1/24/09, 10:27 PM  
Blogger Distributorcap said...
a certain level of accomodation is okay but........
1/25/09, 6:20 AM  
Post a Comment
<< Home