Rachel gives the Democrats hell about their spinelessness in not disciplining Holy Joe Lieberman:
Rachel is absolutely right. Joe Lieberman has become so much of a Republican in heart and soul that he would take great joy in crossing over to vote with them to filibuster Democratic legislation that he, Joe Lieberman, doesn't want to see passed. To allow this vile man to keep his seniority and his committee chairmanship is to give him control over the entire Senate. Harry Reid might retain the title of Senate Majority Leader, but it is Joe Lieberman who would actually "run t'ings". You have to ask yourself why the Democrats are so willing to turn over control to a guy who said he feared for our future if our president-elect were elected. Is it just sheer cowardice, or in his love affair with the Republicans during their time in power in the executive branch, has Holy Joe, with the help of his friends in the White House, compiled a little dossier from
that little switch room in San Francisco?
Labels: Joe Lieberman, scumbaggery
- refusing to accept your defeat in a primary and running against your party in a general election
- speaking actively against your party's presidential candidate to the point of saying the nation would be "in grave danger" if he were elected
- speaking at the Republican National Convention against the Democratic nominee
- actively campaigning for Republicans in downticket races
...constitutes "loyalty to the Dems"? Lieberman may have made Reid majority leader, but Reid owes him no loyalty -- not after Holy Joe's disgraceful behavior this year.
I see no reason to let the results of this election stop me from that.