"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Monday, July 21, 2008

This doesn't sound like a move by someone who's planning to leave next January
Posted by Jill | 6:44 AM
Think what you will about this, but there's something disturbing about the notion that a president who is expected to leave office next January 20 deems it vital that he be able to lock up anyone at any time solely on his say-so:

Last year, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, based in Richmond, Virginia, declared that the government could not hold al-Marri, or any other civilian, simply on the president's orders. If it wanted to prosecute him, the court ruled, it could do so in the civilian court system.

That was the right answer. Unfortunately, last week the full 4th Circuit reversed the decision, and with a tangle of difficult-to-decipher opinions, upheld the government's right to hold al-Marri indefinitely. The court ruled that al-Marri must be given greater rights to challenge his detention. But this part of the decision is weak, and he is unlikely to get the sort of procedural protections necessary to ensure that justice is done.

The implications are breathtaking. The designation "enemy combatant," which should apply only to people captured on a battlefield, can now be applied to people detained inside the United States. Even though al-Marri is not a U.S. citizen, the court's reasoning appears to apply equally to citizens.

Equally troubling, the ruling supports President George W. Bush's ludicrous argument that when Congress authorized the use of force against those responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks, it gave the president essentially unlimited powers. If a president ever wants to round up Americans on vague charges and detain them indefinitely, this ruling gives him a dangerous green light.


With this administration's history of viewing the American people as enemies and threats to government power, requiring constant surveillance, it's difficult to imagine that this is about national security, or anything other than the continued consolidation of absolute power.

Labels: , ,

2 comments
Bookmark and Share
2 Comments:
Blogger D. said...
Cheap shot: Remember Chancellor Palpatine?

Non-cheap shot: Eternal vigilance being the price of liberty, it's time for yelling and klieg lights. And perhaps the REMINDER that REPUBLICANS were behind the 22nd Amendment and have not called for repeal.

Also, let's book the moving van for 1/1/2009 with particular attention to the basement.
7/21/08, 11:04 AM  
Blogger Steve said...
With this administration's history of viewing the American people as enemies and threats to government power, requiring constant surveillance, it's difficult to imagine that this is about national security, or anything other than the continued consolidation of absolute power.

This is precisely why we need someone who has 5 1/2 years of POW camp experience to run this ol' United Gulag of America!

This should have been obvious from the gitgo.
7/21/08, 11:56 AM  
Post a Comment
<< Home