Imagine is one of the worst, most pretentious pieces of claptrap ever composed.
Today is John Lennon's 70th birthday, if he were still with us. As the musicians with whom I grew up start to wane into their late sixties and approach seventy, it simply serves as a reminder that even though having no children lets you kid yourself for a long time that you're staying in one place and not getting older yourself, time marches on.
I have to wonder how Lennon would have been viewed had he not been murdered that night in 1980. Because with all the unreleased tracks and all the biographies and all the recollections of Lennon's life and music both with and without the Beatles that have appeared over the last few years, and from the vantage point of time, it becomes more clear every day that Lennon/McCartney was greater than the sum of its parts. Looking at both John Lennon's and Paul McCartney's post-Beatles careers, we can see how desperately these two guys needed each other to do what they did. Without Paul McCartney to temper Lennon's tendency towards pompous self-importance, Lennon's music veered off into pretentious self-indulgence. Without John Lennon to temper McCartney's tendency toward sappiness, McCartney is more like a Tin Pan Alley pop composer than an influential musician.
The irony is that the most interesting post-Beatles career was had by the late George Harrison, whom it turns out may have been the most gifted Beatle of all.
There will be much typing done today and conversation about the greatness of John Lennon, but while there's no denying how influential he was, that influence was as part of a duo. I mean seriously:
If that were not John Lennon, would anyone have listened to it?
I remember driving over to the nursing home to see my mother for her last Mother's Day - she would die about a month later - and Lennon's "Mother" (first solo album) came on and almost had me in tears. No great lyrics, but his emotion was in them.
George was my favorite Beatle, but aside from "Something", "Here Comes The Sun", "I Me Mine", and "Savoy Truffle" (and maybe "Taxman"), I would be hard-pressed to think of anything he'd done that came up to the standard set by John and Paul.
Mind you, I was in college in the first few post-breakup years, so I was able to listen to each's albums repeatedly and without distractions - I'd really get to know the albums. Now, I'm lucky to give a new album a complete listen before switching back to some oldies I know and love! :)
P.S. Love your blog - I read it every morning!
I went to a party to listen to the The White Album. Twice through and me and the Beatles were quits.
George was the only one that I paid any attention to when the official group broke up. Still feel he was underrated.
Crazy talk, albeit conventional wisdom. The very same year that Lennon released his comeback album, which was full of sentimental material like "(Just Like) Starting Over" and "Beautiful Boy," McCartney released an album that essentially consisted of him farting around with home recording equipment and sequencers, and contained such weirdness as "Coming Up," "Temporary Secretary" and "Frozen Jap."
Sure, I've probably heard She Loves You, I Want to Hold Your Hand and Love Me Do more than enough times...but if one pops up on oldies radio and I haven't heard it in a while, I still get goosebumps. My favorites among the earliest work are the ones that haven't been played to death, like Little Child, Don't Bother Me, From Me To You.
Among the later - and solo - material, some I like, some I dont. And I do like 'Jealous Guy.'
After McCartney's first post-Beatles album, I really don't like much of it. Wing? Eh.
But I do notice lately a Beatles backlash, even among people of my generation. And I don't get it. I remember when the Dave Clark Five was gonna crush the Fab Four.
Certainly there have been other great artists, with great material, but that doesn't mean you have to diss those boys from Liverpool.
http://www.slate.com/id/2267342/entry/2267343
So simpering, so pathetic... to think that the man who once sang "You Can't Do That" would be whining "I was feeling insecure" so annoyingly just a few years later.
John wrote stuff that made you think, and about the experience of life, and wrote more and more of it was that way the older he got.
I like most of what John wrote, as much of his stuff as nearly any other artist that I've heard. You're entitled to your opinion. So what?
Of the two of them, I'd much rather stick with John, a much better writer, a much better human, and a much more interesting person.