"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast" -Oscar Wilde |
"The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself." -- Proverbs 11:25 |
Calling around to a couple of Public Affairs Officers (PAO) who would be handling the flow of information about Track and his unit, VoteVets.org found out that, first, Track is not deploying on September 11. He may be part of a deployment ceremony that day, before going to Kuwait, though one Public Affairs Officer said that any details of the upcoming ceremony hadn't been made public yet by the military.
Governor Palin may have spilled the beans on that one, while showing she doesn't know the difference between a soldier deploying to Iraq vs. one preparing to deploy to Iraq. And while not illegal, if she really did believe that's when he's deploying to Iraq, then she didn't know enough to keep quiet about that to keep from violating OPSEC - something a potential Commander in Chief should know.
But, more disturbing, and definitely in violation of security, are an explosion of stories that say specifically where in Iraq Track is deploying to, which have been dutifully eaten up by right wing websites, and reprinted. I will not reprint it here, because I would only be compounding the issue. But, unfortunately, it is very easy to find on the web at this point.
It is simply impossible that any reporter could figure this out on their own. Just by knowing Track's name and the date he is heading to Kuwait, one could not figure out specifically where Track and his company would be going in Iraq. There's a reason it's impossible to figure that out - because the military doesn't want that information out there. It only serves to aid the enemy to know where are troops are moving.
Did the Pentagon release that information to the press?
No, according to another PAO that VoteVets.org talked with. In fact, this PAO said, the military was actively trying to quash this story, and keep reporters from repeating all these details, because it was a clear OPSEC violation. The PAO was adamant that the military has no idea how these details got out there and doesn't want them out there.
So where is this information coming from, if not the military? Certainly not the Obama campaign, which would not gain anything by promoting Track's service. The only people who I can think of would be those in the McCain-Palin campaign.
If the McCain-Palin campaign has disclosed details about Track's company's movements to gain stories in the press about it, they will have put many American lives in danger - not the least of which would be Track's.
Labels: dumbassery, hypocrisy, John McCain, Sarah Palin
How many Brewster Jennings "employees" were put at risk -- not counting the money and effort that went down the tubes when the "business" closed -- when Mr Cheney outed Ms Plame?
Putting a military unit or two, who haven't even been deployed yet and could easily be reassigned, at risk would seem to be small stuff to that bunch.
You might think that McCain -- he's ex military and a POW after all and, by his own continuing statements, imminently qualified as CIC -- would know better, but this is Rove's doing. McSame hasn't been in charge of anything since his plane went down... And given his flying record, even that could be questioned.
Palin was obviously resorting to the G911iani technique by stating that her son was going to be deployed on 9/11. That date only jives with a ceremonies date, and even Soltz admits it "probably wasn't illegal".
I was first concerned about this whole deployment-of-sonsgate stuff when Biden did it. As a former Marine, I thought at the time - not smart. Remember Prince Harry?
Obviously, two wrongs don't make a right, but with so much stuff going on out there over this new kid on the block from a state most of us know little about it might be best to sift the flour thoroughly before baking.
Yeah, she's beating the patriot drum, as is her partner. So was Biden. It's a wash.