"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Sunday, July 27, 2008

Note to Barack Obama: You cannot be civilized with these people
Posted by Jill | 7:07 AM
Now do you understand that trying to bob and weave and dodge the poisoned darts that the Republicans are throwing at you; that shaking your head ruefully and speaking with great poise and dignity about how "disappointed" you are with McCain, is NOT the way to deal with these people?

How many elections of Democrats taking the high road and claiming that Americans are "too smart to fall for this" does it take before you realize that no, they aren't. Or even if they are, they CHOOSE to fall for it. They choose to fall for it the same way a sizable number have chosen to believe that you are a Muslim spy, that you aren't really a native-born American citizen (funny how that never bothered them during the Great Arnold-for-President frenzy of 2007), and now, apparently, that you have murdered untold numbers of people.

Republicans know what Americans will believe. They understand that small, mean, scared part of the human brain that Rod Serling so deftly pointed out in the classic Twilight Zone episode, "The Monsters are Due on Maple Street". They understand how when faced with a choice between more of the same, even if the same is bad, and a change that can in any way be portrayed as Really, Really Scary, more of the same wins every time. Because Americans hate risk, and we hate change, and we hate difference.

Look at how children are being raised today. Yesterday I wrote about the body armor and the car seats and the antibacterial wipes, but there's more. There are the kids who aren't allowed to play in their own yards because Mom is terrified after watching too much television news that predators lurk behind every tree, ready to take their children. There are the kids whose parents call every day because they're frantic with worry. And yet, these same parents push their kids into youth sports without caring about the backgrounds of the coaches or the lead leaching from the artificial turf that cronies of the local government put down. They feed them soda and Lunchables and fast food. They delude themselves that Fruit Roll-Ups are just as good as fruit. They're ignorant of the radiation emanating from their granite countertops in their gourmet kitchens. So it isn't about the safety, it's really about the fear.

And as we all know, fear works. And when you combine fear of change (new, not well-known, young) with racism (black) and ignorance (Muslim charges), and throw it into a media maw that has demonstrated quite clearly that its masters WILL have John McCain in the White House, you have the environment in which McCain can get away with this:

A new McCain ad that began airing Saturday in selected markets also chides Obama as disrespectful for making "time to go to the gym" during his European visit while at the same time canceling the visit with wounded troops.

"Seems the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras," according to the ad, which is being televised in Colorado, Pennsylvania and the Washington D.C. area. "John McCain is always there for our troops."

McCain himself joined in the rebuke, saying in an interview to be aired Sunday by ABC's "This Week" that "if I had been told by the Pentagon that I couldn't visit those troops, and I was there and wanted to be there, I guarantee you, there would have been a seismic event."


And because Charlie Gibson and George Suckupagus are firmly in the tank for McCain, you can bet that there will be absolutely no questioning about MCain's implication that NOTHING will get in the way of HIS photo-op -- not even the whether the use of “100 American soldiers, with three Blackhawk helicopters, and two Apache gunships overhead” is appropriate.

Senator, your campaign's pinky-in-the-air response:

"Senator McCain knows full well that Senator Obama strongly supports and honors our troops, which is what makes this attack so disingenuous. This politicization of our soldiers is exactly what Senator Obama sought to avoid,"


...is exactly what the Republicans expect from you. It is the presidential campaign equivalent of the Sternly Worded Letter from Congress™ -- and you see how far that's gotten the Senate and House in getting any cooperation from the Bush Administration.

If this is how your campaign is going to handle these outrages in the fall, then you might as well throw in the towel before the convention even happens. Because history has shown that whether you find it distasteful or not, and even whether Americans find it distasteful or not, when push comes to shove, they will vote for the sleazy, lying, dirty campaigner over the classy guy who think intelligent people of goodwill can disagree every single time.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
5 Comments:
Anonymous Anonymous said...
You are so right. The Republicans, who will appeal to the worst in us, cannot be treated with respect. Playing nice gets us nowhere and it loses elections.

As for those parents and children you describe? The ones that crack me up are the ones who won't let their kids play in the yard for fear that they'll be snatched are the same parents who put sports magnets bearing their child's first names on their SUVs and minivans.

If they want to make it easy for a potential predator to grab their kid - they make it easy by giving said predator their kids' first names.

Sheesh.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
No wonder that conservative Zealots and True Believers are holding stupidity as "virtuous," particularly where the Great Unwashed come into the equation.

Blogger Jennifer Briney said...
Hi Jill,

I obviously have no love for McCain and his comments are ridiculous, but I am confused about why Obama canceled a meeting with the troops in Germany. I'm positive that the guys stationed there must have been excited about meeting him, and then he cancels? For what? I know the reason he have was that he didn't want to go there while using campaign money but it seems to me that it just opened up this kind of predictable attack from McCain and left a base full of disappointed soldiers. Seemed like a pretty dumb move on Obama's part right from the start.

Blogger Jill said...
Jen, that someone as informed as you are is confused scares the bejeezus out of me...because what does that say for what's getting across to people who AREN'T paying attention?

The trip was cancelled because the PENTAGON told him a visit would be perceived as a political event.

More here.

To the extent that Obama (or more likely, his staff who coordinated the whole thing) is at fault here, it's in not anticipating a Pentagon roadblock; in assuming that the Pentagon was above this kind of partisanship (a partisanship that you can bet would not be directed at John McCain). And that is my beef with the Obama campaign and indeed with Obama himself. He/they STILL do not understand how the Republicans and the media are ready and waiting to pounce on every little thing. And the problem is that it works. YOU'RE troubled by the cancellation, even though it was done with the best of intentions and an attempt to take the high road. Obama didn't want to go the Bush/McCain route of using wounded soldiers as political props -- and he's getting blasted for it.

Anonymous Anonymous said...
Absolutely!! The Democratic candidate simply cannot allow himself to be put on the defensive. He has to go on the offensive against McCain's sick-fuck right-wing wackaloon scumbag bona fides. Rope-a-dope worked for Ali, but it has never worked for Democrats in presidential elections.