"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde		 Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Friday, May 16, 2008

Do they think no one will notice?
Posted by Jill | 7:00 AM
I'd like to believe that all those who have smugly been raking in the cash in their Wall Street jobs for the last decade and now find themselves either unemployed or in danger of being unemployed learn that they are just so much flotsam and jetsam to their employers:

Thousands are losing their jobs as hard-pressed banks cut deep. But while layoffs are nothing new in the financial industry (they come with almost every downturn), this round seems different: it is eerily quiet.

So quiet, in fact, that people refer to these cuts as stealth layoffs. Some bosses hardly say a word after people are fired. At Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, for example, the first clue that someone is gone can be e-mail messages that are returned to senders from a former colleague’s inactivated corporate address.

[snip]

The idea that banks will slowly wield the knife again and again unnerves many employees. People know the cuts are coming — they just don’t know when or where.

“Nobody knows who is coming in; nobody knows who is going out,” said JoAnne Kennedy, who was laid off by JPMorgan Chase this year. “They want to keep it all as quiet as possible.”

To some bank workers, one round of layoffs seems to blur into the next. At Goldman Sachs, low performers were dismissed from January through March. A few weeks later, the bank quietly began letting more people go. All told, Goldman is axing about 8 percent of its work force, although incoming employees this summer will make up for some of that loss.

At Merrill Lynch, 1,100 people were laid off early this year, mostly in mortgage-related businesses. But in April, the firm announced 2,900 more cuts.

JPMorgan Chase said last fall that it would lay off 100 people in its fixed-income division and then followed up with several smaller rounds of cuts in other parts of the bank. The casualties will keep mounting as JPMorgan melds with Bear Stearns, the troubled investment bank it is buying.

Starting at the top, JPMorgan executives are eliminating jobs at their own bank, redeploying some people to other divisions and replacing others with Bear Stearns workers. As many as 5,500 Bear Stearns employees and 4,000 JPMorgan workers could lose their jobs before it is over.

The steady drumbeat of bad news on Wall Street is sapping morale. Wendi S. Lazar, a partner at the employment law firm of Outten & Golden, said companies are usually better off being open about cutting jobs.

“You’re seeing a very, very inconsistent message to employees,” Ms. Lazar said. “It’s, ‘I don’t know when it’s going to happen, it may be tomorrow, it may be next month; we may be able to keep you, we may not.’ ”

Layoffs are always difficult, but some of the recent cutbacks have been messier than usual. Some JPMorgan employees learned that people from Bear Stearns would get their jobs before the bosses said anything. JPMorgan clients told them first.

Some Lehman Brothers investment bankers found out their jobs were in peril when they saw cardboard boxes and dumpster bins in the hallways in March.

And when Bank of America dismissed some bankers recently, it told them that their annual bonuses had been almost wiped out and that their personal belongings would arrive in the mail. The bank announced many of the layoffs on Feb. 13, two days before many employees would be able to start cashing out stock options.

In January, when Ms. Kennedy was temporarily out of the office at JPMorgan because of surgery, her boss called to say her job had been eliminated. She did not return to her office and ended up asking the bank to send her the photos of her son that she kept on her desk.


I'd like to believe that our society won't be tempted again by the siren song of McMansions and luxury SUVs, but I remember the other times Wall Street headed down this road, and as soon as things get better, people go flocking.

Still, I don't think you can underestimate the damage that layoffs, even stealth layoffs like this, cause to employees. Corporate executives seem to think fear is a motivator, but there's only so long you can work with a sword over your head before you start wanting it to just drop already and put you out of your misery.

Labels:

2 comments
Bookmark and Share
2 Comments:
Blogger Yashmak said...
Unfortunately, I suspect the ones who have been "smugly raking in the cash" are the ones doing the firing, not the ones being fired.

The ones being fired are most likely working stiffs, like most of us.
5/16/08, 3:37 PM  
Blogger Citizen Carrie said...
Jill, I can't help but think of some good posts you've done in the past about the links between stress, obesity and other serious health conditions. I laugh when I think of some of the companies pushing these expensive fancy wellness programs when they would do better just by improving working conditions.

That's interesting how Wall Street is handling the layoffs. You're right. Layoffs used to be announced with great fanfare, and there would be this mass exodus of people leaving their buildings with all of their gear in boxes. I used to think that stealth layoffs were performed because companies had something to hide, e.g., they didn't want the public to know they were outsourcing their staff, or, they didn't want the public to know their company was suffering financially.

I wonder if there is some sort of collusion to mask the layoffs so the public won't think unemployment is an issue? I also wonder if there is some sort of law in effect where if there's a mass layoff they have to let people know a certain amount of time in advance?
5/17/08, 11:18 AM  
Post a Comment
<< Home