"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast" -Oscar Wilde |
"The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself." -- Proverbs 11:25 |
There should be financial accountability for the man who led Bear Stearns as it gorged on dubious subprime securities to boost its profits and share price, helping to set up one of the biggest financial collapses since the savings-and-loan crisis in the 1980s. Some might argue that he should have lost it all.
But that’s not how it works. The ongoing bailout of the financial system by the Federal Reserve underscores the extent to which financial barons socialize the costs of private bets gone bad. Not a week goes by that the Fed doesn’t inaugurate a new way to provide liquidity — meaning money — to the financial system. Bear Stearns isn’t enormous. It doesn’t take deposits from the public. Yet the Fed believed that letting it implode could unleash a domino effect among other banks, and the Fed provided a $30 billion guarantee for JPMorgan to snap it up.
Compared to the cold shoulder given to struggling homeowners, the cash and attention lavished by the government on the nation’s financial titans provides telling insight into the priorities of the Bush administration. It’s not simply a matter of fairness, though. The Fed is probably right to be doing all it can think of to avoid worse damage than the economy is already suffering. But if the objective is to encourage prudent banking and keep Wall Street’s wizards from periodically driving financial markets over the cliff, it is imperative to devise a remuneration system for bankers that puts more of their skin in the game.
Financiers, of course, dispute that they are being insufficiently penalized. “I received no bonus for 2007, no severance pay, no golden parachute,” E. Stanley O’Neal, the former chief executive of Merrill Lynch, told a House committee recently. That doesn’t seem like much of a blow to Mr. O’Neal, who was removed earlier this year following gargantuan subprime-related losses.
[snip]
Bankers operate under a system that provides stellar rewards when the investment strategies do well yet puts a floor on their losses when they go bad. They might have to forgo a bonus if investments turn sour. They might even be fired. Their equity might become worthless — or not, if the Fed feels it must step in. But as a rule, they won’t have to return the money they made in the good days when they were making all the crazy bets that eventually took their banks down.
Labels: Barack Obama, economic death watch, hack journalism, racism
As if the questionable Iraqi contracts weren't enough, now we have him simply opening the vaults and inviting his buddies in to help themselves...
"Get it while it's still worth something, fellas!"
I wonder if 2-cent dollars was on the original agenda, or if he truly did screw up this time???
Or is there something in worthless dollars that I'm not seeing??
Remember, those bundled* sub-prime securities were sold for cash by someone. As is usual with any Ponzi scheme, the last ones in hold an empty bag. The first ones in are always elusive.
This same scenario existed with the S&L debacle in the late 80's. Estimates of anywhere from $600 - $900 billion just.....disappeared!
And, gee, wasn't there a Bush bro involved with that one too?
You can be sure that in another 10-20 years, it'll happen all over again cause Wall Street don't need no stinkin' regulations.
Bundling: The financial equivalent of hiding a haystack in a needle.
An honest, but probably lengthy, search could easily find the money in the pockets of the usual suspects. [Did you hear that a mutual fund run by Carlyle -- ie, the Bush boys -- went bust!? Wonder where THAT money went??]
But as someone said not too long ago, it's impossible to get it back because "the crooks always spend it!"
but he went on and on about the grandmother -- and he keeps draping himself in his own putrid patriotism --
as long as the media is complicit in so many things - illegal wars and now race baiting -- for their own self interest (ratings).. we have no chance
even if obama doesnt ever make it to the WHite house -- he has done something for this country that Scarborough (who is just a nicer Limbaugh) could never do --- address issues upfront and without remorse or without tiptoeing... and not wrap it up in smugness and arrognace. he says he admires obama but then makes the grandmother story into the proverbial mountain out of a molehill
FU scarborough for being what is SO wrong with america