"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Thursday, July 28, 2005

Just wondering
Posted by Jill | 7:06 AM

If I go apply for a job, I have to provide information about my past experience, and if I am being considered seriously, I often have to take a drug test and undergo a full background check, including a credit check. I'll be judged not just for my skills, but also for how I'll "fit in" to the environment. And all this is for a job in which I would have no guarantee of continued employment.

So why should a Supreme Court nominee be exempt from having to provide any information whatsoever about his qualifications and views for a job that's a lifetime appointment?
Bookmark and Share