This is hardly a surprise, but the House Judiciary Committee voted yesterday against adopting a resolution demanding that Bush agencies turn over all credentialing information related to Gannonguckert. In one of the most preposterous statements of reality creation in an Administration that gets more preposterous on this front daily, Sen. James Sensenbrenner (R-Moral Relativism) said he felt that "the Administration, in my opinion, has substantially investigated this matter.
Just for the record, for those who want to write to excoriate or thank their Congresscritters, here's how the vote went down.
Voting in favor (all Democrats):
Rep. Conyers
Rep. Berman
Rep. Scott
Rep. Watt
Rep. Jackson-Lee
Rep. Waters
Rep. Meehan
Rep. Schiff
Rep. Sanchez
Rep. Van Hollen
Voting against (all Republicans):
Rep. Sensenbrenner
Rep. Coble
Rep. (Lamar) Smith
Rep. Gallegly
Rep. Goodlatte
Rep. Chabot
Rep. Lungren
Rep. Jenkins
Rep. Cannon
Rep. Bachus
Rep. Inglis
Rep. Hostettler
Rep. Green
Rep. Keller
Rep. Issa
Rep. Flake
Rep. Pence
Rep. Forbes
Rep. King
Rep. Franks
Rep. Gohmert
Not voting:
Democrats:
Rep. Boucher
Rep. Nadler
Rep. Lofgren
Rep. Delahunt
Rep. Wexler
Rep. Weiner
Rep. (Adam) Smith
Republicans: Rep. Hyde
Rep. Feeney
(via
Raw Story)
So the logical conclusion is that morality depends on with what political party you're affiliated, and how much you worship Jesus H. Bush. If you're a Republican and you believe Bush is God, you can pretty much do what you want, even if you're gay. But if you're a heathen Democrat, you can want to pledge undying devotion to your partner, pledge to be faithful from this day forward and raise a family, you're a moral degenerate.
Can someone tell me in what kind of universe this sort of thinking would make sense?