"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata

"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.

"I came here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum." -- "Rowdy" Roddy Piper (1954-2015), They Live
Friday, July 27, 2007

It doesn't matter; Bush will pardon Gonzo anyway
Posted by Jill | 5:29 AM
Of course Bush will pardon Gonzales if the latter is impeached in Congress. That's what the Bush Crime Family does -- they take care of their good loyal soldiers.

Doesn't mean Congress shouldn't make him do it.

Yesterday FBI Director Robert Mueller testified that the infamous 2004 confrontation WAS, in fact, about the NSA spying program:

The director, Robert S. Mueller III, told the House Judiciary Committee that the confrontation was about the National Security Agency’s counterterrorist eavesdropping program, describing it as “an N.S.A. program that has been much discussed.” His testimony was a serious blow to Mr. Gonzales, who insisted at a Senate hearing on Tuesday that there were no disagreements inside the Bush administration about the program at the time of those discussions or at any other time.

The director’s remarks were especially significant because Mr. Mueller is the Justice Department’s chief law enforcement official. He also played a crucial role in the 2004 dispute over the program, intervening with President Bush to help deal with the threat of mass resignations that grew out of a day of emergency meetings at the White House and at the hospital bedside of John Ashcroft, who was then attorney general.

In a separate development, Senate Democrats, who were unaware of Mr. Mueller’s comments, demanded the appointment of a special counsel to investigate whether Mr. Gonzales committed perjury in his testimony on Tuesday about the intelligence dispute. The Senate Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, issued a subpoena to Karl Rove, the White House senior political adviser, and another presidential aide, J. Scott Jennings, for testimony about the dismissal of federal prosecutors, another issue that has dogged Mr. Gonzales.

White House officials said the Democrats had engaged in political gamesmanship.

“What we are witnessing is an out-of-control Congress which spends time calling for special prosecutors, starting investigations, issuing subpoenas and generally just trying to settle scores,” said Scott M. Stanzel, a White House spokesman. “All the while they fail to pass appropriations bills and important issues like immigration reform, energy and other problems go unanswered.”

The conflict underscored how Mr. Gonzales’s troubles have expanded beyond accusations of improper political influence in the dismissal of United States attorneys to the handling of the eavesdropping program, in which Mr. Gonzales was significantly involved in his previous post as White House counsel.

“I had an understanding that the discussion was on a N.S.A. program,” Mr. Mueller said in answer to a question from Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, Democrat of Texas, in a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.

Asked whether he was referring to the Terrorist Surveillance Program, or T.S.P., he replied, “The discussion was on a national N.S.A. program that has been much discussed, yes.”

Which means that either Gonzales perjured himself, or else there is ANOTHER spying program even more secret, and presumably even worse, than the already-illegal NSA program.

So why was this man smirking during his testimony? In all likelihood, as Jon Ponder says, it's because Gonzales knows that he will never spend a minute in jail -- that all he needs to do is remain loyal to The Family, and he'll be pardoned. Still, this should not dissuade Congress from doing the right thing. It's highly unlikely that Bush will be impeached, and that even if impeachment articles are drawn up, and even if they are sent on to the Senate by the House, he won't be convicted because Senate Republicans have put the American people on notice that to them, party loyalty trumps everything -- even the rule of law, even the United States Constitution. The best we can hope for is to ensure that the history books put on record that the 43rd president was a criminal who pardoned all the men who fell on their swords for him.


Bookmark and Share