"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007
"Next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be president of the United States, please pay attention." -- Molly Ivins, 1944-2007

Over 7000 8000(!!!) Posts and over 1,000,000 pages served

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata
"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.
Monday, June 07, 2010

Dispatch from Idiot America
Posted by Jill | 9:38 PM
Memo to Russell Hesch: Dexter Morgan is a FICTIONAL character:
A 73-year-old Michigan man and his son who lives in Colorado have been accused of sending U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak a letter threatening to spill the blood of the congressman and his family for his vote in favor of the health care reform legislation in March.

In 2007, a letter from Hesch was published in the Ogemaw County Herald in which he criticized Stupak for his support of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Supporting Pelosi was akin to voting to “abandon the American concept of victory over our enemies and to emberace defeat,” the letter states.

“In light of America’s enemies joyfully embracing and encouraging you and Pelosi along with the entire Democrat Party…do you intend to continue to support position that can only be regarded as seditious at best?”

The letter is signed, Russell J. Hesch, LTC USA (Ret), and several West Branch area officials and residents said today he was well known and mostly respected within the community.

[snip]

FBI Special Agent Travis Lloyd, in a court affidavit, said Russell Hesch provided authorities a signed statement last Friday indicating he had written the threatening letter to Stupak and sent it to his son in Colorado with instructions to mail it from Denver so it couldn’t be traced back to either of them.

The letter was sent in an envelope that said “Stupak family” and was titled “Your Vote for National Health Care.” In it, the author accused Stupak of having “sold your sole (sic) to the devil.”

“Actions and decisions carry consequences,” it went on to say, naming Stupak’s wife and son by name. It then referenced the Showtime show “Dexter,” in which a police employee is also a serial killer, murdering those he believes should die.

This is the same kind of mindset that thinks Sarah Palin is winking at them and that George W. Bush would be a good buddy to have. It's a mindset that thinks Jack Bauer is real; a mind so limited that it thinks there are people living inside their TVs.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

George W. Mengele
Posted by Jill | 9:04 PM
When we have evidence that George W. Bush authorized experimentation on detainees in his so-called War On Terror, is it OK to post the above headline now?
In the most comprehensive investigation to date of health professionals’ involvement in the CIA’s “enhanced” interrogation program (EIP), Physicians For Human Rights has uncovered evidence that indicates the Bush administration apparently conducted illegal and unethical human experimentation and research on detainees in CIA custody. The apparent experimentation and research appear to have been performed to provide legal cover for torture, as well as to help justify and shape future procedures and policies governing the use of the “enhanced” interrogation techniques. The PHR report, Experiments in Torture: Human Subject Research and Evidence of Experimentation in the ‘Enhanced’ Interrogation Program, is the first to provide evidence that CIA medical personnel engaged in the crime of illegal experimentation after 9/11, in addition to the previously disclosed crime of torture.

(via)

This evidence indicating apparent research and experimentation on detainees opens the door to potential additional legal liability for the CIA and Bush-era officials. There is no publicly available evidence that the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel determined that the alleged experimentation and research performed on detainees was lawful, as it did with the “enhanced” techniques themselves.

“The CIA appears to have broken all accepted legal and ethical standards put in place since the Second World War to protect prisoners from being the subjects of experimentation,” said Frank Donaghue, PHR’s Chief Executive Officer. “Not only are these alleged acts gross violations of human rights law, they are a grave affront to America’s core values.”

[snip]

Physicians for Human Rights demands that President Obama direct the Attorney General to investigate these allegations, and if a crime is found to have been committed, prosecute those responsible. Additionally, Congress must immediately amend the War Crimes Act (WCA) to remove changes made to the WCA in 2006 by the Bush Administration that allow a more permissive definition of the crime of illegal experimentation on detainees in US custody. The more lenient 2006 language of the WCA was made retroactive to all acts committed by US personnel since 1997.

“In their attempt to justify the war crime of torture, the CIA appears to have committed another alleged war crime – illegal experimentation on prisoners,” said Nathaniel A. Raymond, Director of PHR’s Campaign Against Torture and lead report author. “Justice Department lawyers appear to never have assessed the lawfulness of the alleged research on detainees in CIA custody, despite how essential it appears to have been to their legal cover for torture.”

PHR’s report, Experiments in Torture, is relevant to present-day national security interrogations, as well as Bush-era detainee treatment policies. As recently as February, 2010, President Obama’s then director of national intelligence, Admiral Dennis Blair, disclosed that the US had established an elite interrogation unit that will conduct “scientific research” to improve the questioning of suspected terrorists. Admiral Blair declined to provide important details about this effort.

“If health professionals participated in unethical human subject research and experimentation they should be held to account,” stated Scott A. Allen, MD, a medical advisor to Physicians for Human Rights and lead medical author of the report. “Any health professional who violates their ethical codes by employing their professional expertise to calibrate and study the infliction of harm disgraces the health profession and makes a mockery of the practice of medicine.”

Of course what else would you expect from a guy who does this:
"We were terrible to animals," recalled Mr. Throckmorton, laughing. A dip behind the Bush home turned into a small lake after a good rain, and thousands of frogs would come out.

"Everybody would get BB guns and shoot them," Mr. Throckmorton said. "Or we'd put firecrackers in the frogs and throw them and blow them up."

Perhaps this is why the right is so bound and determined to paint Barack Obama as the antichrist. It's just projection of their worship for his predecessor -- a sociopath just like them.

Special Bonus Link: Connecting the Oil Dots.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Ironie ist Verboten.

In a sane world sensible to irony, intolerant of hypocrisy and stupidity, one that vilifies cruelty, prejudice and needless paranoia, people such as Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter would be reduced to standing on the street corners of America's inner cities holding up tattered, feces-stained cardboard signs proclaiming "Teh End is NEER!!"

However, these people and many others are among the richest and most influential people in the media today. How, we naive liberals ask daily, do these people thrive and how do they get national platforms?

Well, we live in a theoretical democracy in which one of the strongest laws is called the First Amendment. As well as guaranteeing us the right to peaceful assembly, to petition and to worship free from persecution, the First Amendment also gives us invaluable freedoms such as the right to free speech and a free press.

OK, class, simmer down and stop sniggering. I already know that the emerging fascist state in our government and nation had long ago already adroitly circumvented every one of those rights and made them conditional. Petitions don't have to be accepted, the right to assemble can also be denied at the whims of police chiefs and anyone who's ever been circumscribed in a "free speech zone" or was penned behind barbed wire chain link fences ironically named "freedom cages" and watched by snipers during the 2004 Democratic Convention in Boston can tell you the exact limits of two of our most cherished constitutional protections.

Still, you get one freebie: Why do people like Glenn Beck get not only one free pass after another but why is he also among the wealthiest people on Fox Spews when by all rights he would've been hounded out of Rupert Murdoch's Castle Frankenstein by a screaming mob a la James Whale?

Well, America, you have only to blame yourselves for the emergence of people like Glenn Beck. You ever heard of the bedrock economic principle of "supply and demand"?

You see, kiddies, long ago Jabba the Hutt Roger Ailes decided that the nation provided him with a still largely untapped reservoir of conspiracy theory lunacy. It's perhaps no coincidence that Fox Spews was launched by a Republican operative at the midway point of the Clinton presidency. Still branded to this day as a liberal, the right wing dictator-coddling, Godfather of NAFTA provided Republican conspiracy theorists of all stripes to finally connect and to denounce our 42nd president while remaining strangely blase and nonchalant about his fascist successor.

Yet, you would think that even the First Amendment would protect people like Glenn Beck only so far and that even the irony-challenged pod people who make up Fox's hard core would realize that something's seriously wrong when their hero Beck goes on his radio program to publicly laud one of America's most rabid anti-Semitic cranks, Elizabeth Dilling.

To those of you who have forgotten Dilling, you can be forgiven. Long since dismissed by evil liberals as the hysterical crank that she was, the anti-Semitic movement's answer to the cat lady with head-high stacks of Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and given a wide berth even on Halloween, Dilling was largely forgotten by her death in 1966.

But in her day, as a contemporary of Father Coughlin, Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, Ezra Pound and other Jew-baiters of note in the first third of this century, Dilling also was more than philosophically sympathetic to the same Nazi Party of whose growing emergence in the Age of Obama Glenn Beck is hoarsely warning us. That would be the same Glenn Beck who, like all good Republicans, loves Israel but denigrates its religion.

Irony, thy name is Fox.

So what do we infer from Beck's championing yet another paranoid conspiracy tome of antiquity, this time Dilling's The Red Network?

Well, we're supposed to just ignore Dilling's politically-incorrect anti-Semitism for her politically-correct pro-Nazism, which is not at all synonymous with anti-Semitism. Plus, in encouraging his listeners to think for themselves, Beck diplomatically elects not to condemn Dilling for her hatred of Jews. That's up to Beck's listeners.

Likewise, we're also not supposed to remember or learn on our own that under Communist rule, Soviet Russia was almost as virulently anti-Semitic as Nazi Germany. Dilling was such a Jew hater she wouldn't even give brownie points to the Commies for interning millions of Russian Jews in their gulags.

Likewise, we're also not supposed to remember or learn that, while Karl Marx was a Jew, the kind of Communism he was thinking of wasn't the same kind that was hijacked by Lenin and Stalin. Communism, under Marx and Engel, was supposed to empower the workers of the world. Under Lenin and Stalin, workers were more impoverished than ever and were hardly what you'd call empowered.

Sort of like in the latter-day United States.

But thematically intact, cogent, logically-consistent arguments was never Beck's forte and that explains his appeal to those who are similarly crippled and hobbled by whatever intellectual bastinado that'd been visited on them by shoddy parenting and the public school system.

Because pining for the days of Joe McCarthy and tacitly glorifying fascism, in resurrecting the biggest mistakes and blackest parts of human history is the legacy of latter-day conservatism. No crime, no atrocity is too great to be permanently put to rest. In short, you can't keep a good right wing tyrant down forever.

And you have their apologists, the muckrakers of Fox Spews to thank for stirring up these fascist elements.

Noted antisemite Ezra Pound was incarcerated at St. Elizabeth's Hospital in Washington, DC largely for his antisemitism and pro-fascist broadcasts from Europe. It was obvious that Pound was deranged even as far as Nazi apologists went. He wouldn't get released until 1958, 13 years after the war ended.

But then, that was during a time when we had a better handle on what elements were dangerous in our society. Eventually, people like Pound and Father Coughlin were hounded off the air waves and fringe lunatics like Skousen and Dilling were rightfully relegated to the obscurity they deserved.

Today's system not only takes up and resurrects their causes, its right wing pundits even enrich themselves beyond the original lunatics' wildest dreams of avarice.
Bookmark and Share

Wow...this is cool
Posted by Jill | 6:14 AM
A few weeks ago we had a neighborhood garage sale, which resulted in somewhat anemic sales for just about everyone involved. It occurred to me that much of the kind of crap people put out at garage sales -- cheap toys, old cookware, old glassware and sichses -- can now be purchased just as cheaply at the local dollar store. There are still the earlybirds who come around looking for treasures. But as tchotchkes and cultural effluvia of the first half of the twentieth century no longer have a place in our cultural memory, items from that time languish at garage sales, a casualty of the reality that during the heyday of "Antiques Roadshow", more Americans began to be savvy about just what they had. The days when I could go into a flew market for an animal shelter and get there just in time to see someone donating a supermarket bag FULL of vintage Steiff animals and buy the whole bag for twenty-five bucks are over.

A family friend once gave me a huge box of really old sheet music dating from about 1905 to 1918. Some of the covers are beautiful. I sold what I could on Ebay after she died, most of it generating about $1-$5 each, and donated the proceeds to breast cancer research. I've kept a few of the nicest remaining pieces, sold a couple at our LAST garage sale, Freecycled a few stacks of it, and still have about three dozen pieces. No one wants this stuff. Even an original Cab Calloway recording of "Blues in the Night" on the Okeh label can be had on Ebay for five bucks now.

So I guess no one but silent movie buffs and cinephiles will be interested in the treasure trove of previously "lost" silent films that were just found in New Zealand, of all places:
A late silent feature directed by John Ford, a short comedy directed by Mabel Normand, a period drama starring Clara Bow and a group of early one-reel westerns are among a trove of long-lost American films recently found in the New Zealand Film Archive.

Among the discoveries are several films that underline the major contribution made by women to early cinema. “The Girl Stage Driver” (1914) belongs to a large subgenre that Mr. Abel has identified as “cowboy girl” pictures; “The Woman Hater” (1910) is an early vehicle for the serial queen Pearl White; and “Won in a Cupboard” (1914) is the earliest surviving film directed by Normand, the leading female star of Mack Sennett’s Keystone comedies. The Clara Bow film “Maytime” (1923), presents the most famous flapper of the 1920s in an unusual costume role.

Getting the films, which were printed on the unstable, highly inflammable nitrate stock used until the early 1950s, to the United States hasn’t been easy. “There’s no Federal Express for nitrate out of New Zealand,” said Annette Melville, the director of the foundation. “We’re having to ship in U.N.-approved steel barrels, a little bit at a time. So far we’ve got about one third of the films, and preservation work has already begun on four titles.”

As the films arrive, they are placed in cold storage to slow further degeneration. “We’re triaging the films,” Ms. Melville said, “so we can get to the worst case ones first. About a quarter of the films are in advanced nitrate decay, and the rest have good image quality, though they are badly shrunken.”

As funds permit, the repatriated films will be distributed among the five major nitrate preservation facilities in the United States — the Library of Congress, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, George Eastman House, the U.C.L.A. Film & Television Archive and the Museum of Modern Art — where the painstaking work of reclaiming images from material slowly turning to muck will be performed.

Sony, the corporation that currently owns the Columbia library, has assumed the costs for “Mary of the Movies,” a 1923 comedy that is now the earliest Columbia feature known to survive. And 20th Century Fox, a descendant of the studio that made “Upstream,” has taken responsibility for preservation of that title. If all goes well, the restored “Upstream” will be receive its repremiere at the Academy in September.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Nice work, Israel
Posted by Jill | 5:44 AM
There's always been this nasty stereotype of the crafty, cunning, sneaky Jew. I never knew where this came from, because as someone who's from parents who were self-styled Jewish intellectuals, it always seemed that we wore our intelligence on our sleeve. So it's hard to fathom, how even as paranoid as Bibi Netanyahu is, he could be so fucking stupid as to not figure out that if you're going to attack a ship from one of your few Muslim ally states in the Middle East, they're going to get pissed off:
The women wore veils. The men donned green Hamas headbands with swirling Arabic script. They gathered by the thousands in a sunny, working-class plaza in Istanbul, bellowing: "Damn Israel!"

The Saturday demonstration seemed incongruous with the image Turkey has long had in the West as a secular friend of Israel and the United States.

But in recent days, public anger has flared over Israel's bloody seizure of a Turkish-flagged aid ship headed to the Gaza Strip, which is under an Israeli blockade. The incident occurred as Turkey has been strengthening ties with Muslim governments in the region -- becoming more vocally pro-Palestinian and trying to head off new U.N. sanctions on Iran.

That has prompted worried speculation at home and abroad: Is Turkey turning away from the West?

The article goes on to take a more reassuring tone about the Turkish government, but if faced with relentless anti-Israel demonstrations in the streets, how long is it going to take before the pro-western secular government is overthrown? And THEN what happens?

American policy has always been staunchly pro-Israel on the grounds that Israel is our only truly reliable ally in the Middle East. But how much of an ally is a country that insists on behaving like a lone wolf? Israel's paranoia may be justified by the fact that there are those who want it wiped off the map, but I'd like someone to tell me just how sixty-plus years of this has done anything to stop that threat.

I know that there are many American Jews who will support everything the Israeli government decides to do, right or wrong. And they vote. And politicians, particularly Democratic ones, are terrified of losing that vote, particularly to a party whose tubthumping for Israel is based on the apocalyptic delusions of their own religious fanatical base. You'd think that American Jews would be smart enough to know that the so-called pro-Israel sentiment of the Christofascist Zombie Brigade isn't based on love for the Jews, but on the promise of being able to sit on the couch with Jesus, chowing down on nachos and watching unconverted Jews burn. But Israel is such a blind spot that sometimes Israel policy drives everything.

If poor little Israel can't survive without American support and money, don't you think we ought to have some input in how it conducts itself as part of the world community?

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

In case you didn't already think BP was one of the worst corporations in the world
Posted by Jill | 5:28 AM
Is there nothing this company doesn't want to wreck?
The massive BP oil refinery in Whiting, Ind., is planning to dump significantly more ammonia and industrial sludge into Lake Michigan, running counter to years of efforts to clean up the Great Lakes.

Indiana regulators exempted BP from state environmental laws to clear the way for a $3.8 billion expansion that will allow the company to refine heavier Canadian crude oil. They justified the move in part by noting the project will create 80 new jobs.

Under BP's new state water permit, the refinery -- already one of the largest polluters along the Great Lakes -- can release 54 percent more ammonia and 35 percent more sludge into Lake Michigan each day. Ammonia promotes algae blooms that can kill fish, while sludge is full of concentrated heavy metals.

The refinery will still meet federal water pollution guidelines. But federal and state officials acknowledge this marks the first time in years that a company has been allowed to dump more toxic waste into Lake Michigan.

[snip]

The company will now be allowed to dump an average of 1,584 pounds of ammonia and 4,925 pounds of sludge into Lake Michigan every day. The additional sludge is the maximum allowed under federal guidelines.

Company officials insisted they did everything they could to keep more pollution out of the lake.

"It's important for us to get our product to market with minimal environmental impact," said Tom Keilman, a BP spokesman. "We've taken a number of steps to improve our water treatment and meet our commitments to environmental stewardship."

If you believe that, you probably believed that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, June 06, 2010

How to Clean a Pelican
Posted by Jill | 2:07 PM
These people should get extra bonus points from Goddess for doing this:



International Bird Rescue Research Center is using existing funds to pay for the current cleanup effort, but if you want to fund future operations, you can do so here, or adopt a pelican (not necessarily a Gulf bird) here.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Aren't you glad you don't have friends like Sally Quinn?
Posted by Jill | 12:41 PM
Who the hell cares what Sally Quinn has to say, anyway? All she is, is an aging mean girl who fucked her way into marrying then-Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee, and set herself up as arbiter of Washington social life -- you know, the Washington social life that all too often drives journalists instead of, say, what's going on that's actually important.

But be thankful that you don't have friends who go on TV to speculate about your marriage:

I mean please. That much of Teh Stoopid and Teh Petty is more than I can take. Someone. Make it stop.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Can we please stop putting people into food boxes?
Posted by Jill | 8:29 AM
Amanda blogged the other day about a University of Washington study showing that people who shop at low-end supermarkets tend to be more obese than those who shop at high-end markets like Whole Foods.

There's this thing going on in the progressive blogosphere, where we think about things like this, that the quality of what people eat is solely based on socioeconomic status, and that because we are good little progressives who go to gyms and read labels and go to local farmers' markets, and walk to the market that's a mile away to get a half-gallon of organic instead of getting into the car. We want to fight the good fight about getting things like fresh produce into low-income neighborhoods. All these are worthy things to do and worthy goals, but while embarking on a quest to make the perfect loaf of bread might make good fodder for a book, how many of us, even at higher income levels, have time for this?

One of the things that grieves me about the schedule I currently keep is that I feel sometimes as if I don't even know how to cook anymore. It isn't that I don't like to cook; I enjoy cooking. I'm a good cook. But when I'm up at 5 AM, out the door by 7:15 at the latest, and don't get home till 7 PM most nights, who the heck has time?

Mr. Brilliant and I eat dinner together most nights. It's important, I think, that we do this, because we really don't get much time together during the week. Just because we don't have kids doesn't mean that "together-time" isn't important. It would be very easy to tell him to just get lunch instead (since he tends to only eat once a day) and I'll get one of the healthy options at the company cafeteria, and the hell with it. Mr. B isn't a cook. He doesn't much like to cook. But because he gets home much earlier than I do, the cooking, such as it is, falls into his lap. He can grill things, and saute some frozen green beans in garlic, and make pasta with meat sauce. I taught him how to halve a pint of grape tomatoes, saute them in garlic, toss in some frozen chopped spinach and a splash of white wine and serve it over some packaged tortellini. But frankly, for the most part, Trader Joe's has really saved us on weeknights. The problem is, it gets a bit dull after a while. And while Trader Joe's food may be less processed than some others, it's still packaged food. It's multigrain pilaf in a pouch and pre-sliced roast real turkey with gravy and mashed potatoes with the aforementioned green beans; it's their pork roast florentine and prepackaged salads. So while it's better than eating Kraft macaroni and yellow powder and chicken nuggets and frozen non-food, it's still not something you made fresh.

On weekends we usually go out, so that we both get some time off. And again, it's being able to sit at a table together and chat and enjoy a meal. Sometimes on a nice evening we get takeout from the Greek place or thin-crust pizza and go sit in the park. Or we go here, where the we get plates of whole wheat linguini with chicken, broccoli rabe and fresh tomato. Or any of a number of places. The biggest minefield is the Tom Sawyer Diner, about which I've written before, which has amazingly good food, but if you stray from the salads, the excellent chicken souvlaki, or the surprisingly fresh and well-prepared seafood, you're likely to end up with something like the "Tom's Mex", which is a 15" plate piled with chili & cheese nachos, slices of chorizo, taquitos filled with con queso, 4 grilled shrimp, cheese quesadilla wedges, and for some strange reason, nuggets of what appear to be breaded fried macaroni and cheese. It's a heart attack on a plate, even if a well-prepared one.

So I navigate these places, choosing the fish and the whole wheat pasta and the bifteki, which is less meat than the gyro, and the veggie pizza. But it's still not the quinoa salad with organic arugula and fresh bell pepper that I might make if I had the time and if I didn't feel that on the weekends I just want to clean my house and otherwise slack off.

So where I'm going with all this, is that Amanda makes the point that cooking is often time-consuming, requires advance thought, and is difficult for some people -- even those who are not low income, to plan and prepare fresh meals week in and week out for twenty or thirty or so years. I'd love to clip recipes and sit with the grocery circulars and plan meals for seven days a week and lovingly prepare them at my leisure. But when you're in the kitchen at 8:30 at night chopping carrots and onions so that you can throw it in the crockpot inthe morning before you leave at 6:15 AM for a 7 AM conference call, you're going to start answering the siren song of Trader Joe and Tom Sawyer ever-more-frequently.

While it's all well and good to have the goal of eating locally where possible, and providing access to better-quality food for low income neighborhoods, we also have to look at the high-stress lives of most Americans. Either we are working ourselves to death in jobs we already have, sometimes multiples of them, or we are out of work and have gnawing terror of the future. Either way, we're not not making the quinoa salad.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

As I said before, it's almost enough to make you think they did it on purpose
Posted by Jill | 5:36 AM
Last week I posted about how the Deepwater Horizon disaster seemed almost too convenient as a way to completely derail the rest of Barack Obama's presidency. I mean, it isn't as if oil companies and the politicians they own give a fig about the environment, other than to the extent that it might interfere with tourism dollars. Do you think that Haley Barbour cares about the people in his state who are losing their livelihoods? Do you think Bobby Jingles cares? These are guys who live solely for their own political careers. They've been touting free unfettered corporatism, and the result is washing up on their shores now. Barbour is out there saying the beaches are completely safe, and Jingles is just whining for more money from the federal government he'd like to dismantle if elected president.

But for Barbour and Jingles, both still touted as 2012 presidential hopefuls, the best thing that could happen is for Barack Obama to continue to seem apathetic and hapless in the face of this disaster (not that Obama can actually DO much of anything, and he's not the tear-in-his-eye, suck-in-the-lower-lip kind of guy that Clinton was). And that is why my tinfoil started tingling just a bit last week when the meme of derailing Obama's agenda found its way into the New York Times.

But while that's a bit far-fetched, you have to start wondering what's going on when you find out that BP CEO Tony Hayward sold a whole bunch of company stock just weeks before his company murdered the Gulf of Mexico:
Tony Hayward cashed in about a third of his holding in the company one month before a well on the Deepwater Horizon rig burst, causing an environmental disaster.

Mr Hayward, whose pay package is £4 million a year, then paid off the mortgage on his family’s mansion in Kent, which is estimated to be valued at more than £1.2 million.

There is no suggestion that he acted improperly or had prior knowledge that the company was to face the biggest setback in its history.

His decision, however, means he avoided losing more than £423,000 when BP’s share price plunged after the oil spill began six weeks ago.

Of course there's no suggestion. Just like there was no suggestion when military planes were ordered to stand down on 9/11/01 and unusual safety drills were held at the World Trade Center two weeks before that day, that it meant any foreknowledge of what was to happen. They have to say that.

But someone ought to be asking Tony Hayward exactly what it was that prompted him to sell his stock. George Bush received a briefing on August 6, 2001. Tony Hayward had the BP Regional Oil Spill Response Plan for the Gulf of Mexico in June 2009. Karen Dalton Beninato at NewOrleans.com went through the whole thing, which is 600 pages of convoluted organization charts (the better to say "Not me, him"), flow charts, and other typical corporate boilerplate, and summarizes:
1) In the worst case discharge scenario (on chart below), an oil leak was expected to come ashore with highest probability in Plaquemines Parish within 30 days (see map above from the Advance Response Plan). This makes it clear that BP could have stored adequate boom there before a rig failure like the Deepwater Horizon, and workers could have been mobilized to apply the boom in the 30 days that the response plan predicted oil would hit our wetlands.

[snip]

2) Spokespersons were advised never to assure the public that an ecosystem would be back to normal after the worst case scenario, which we are now living through. "No statements shall be made concerning any of the following: promises that property, ecology, or anything else will be restored to normal." Even in BP CEO Tony Hayward's new television commercial his assurance is an ambiguous, "We will make this right," which does not specifically address preserving or restoring America's Wetlands.

[snip]

3) Corexit oil dispersant toxicity has not been tested on ecosystems, according to the Oil Spill Response Plan. "Ecotoxilogical effects: No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product." It is contradictory that the question and answer section discusses the choice of a dispersant with: "Have environmental tradeoffs of dispersant use indicated that use should be considered? Note: This is one of the more difficult questions" and "Has the overflight to assure that endangered species are not in the application area been conducted?" Brown pelicans and sea turtles would have been the answer to the latter.
Bookmark and Share
Saturday, June 05, 2010

I'm sorry, but South Carolina really IS the stupidest fucking place on the entire planet
Posted by Jill | 8:27 AM
As if Mark Sanford hiking the Appalachian Trail wasn't bad enough, now we have this:
With a bead of sweat rolling down the side of his face outside a Columbia bar, Republican S.C. Sen. Jake Knotts called Lexington Rep. Nikki Haley, an Indian-American Republican woman running for governor, a “raghead” several times while explaining how he believed she was hiding her true religion from voters.

“She’s a f#!king raghead,” Knotts said.

He later clarified his statement. He did not mean to use the F-word.

Knotts says he believed Haley has been set up by a network of Sikhs and was programmed to run for governor of South Carolina by outside influences in foreign countries. He claims she is hiding her religion and he wants the voters to know about it.

“We got a raghead in Washington; we don’t need one in South Carolina,” Knotts said more than once. “She’s a raghead that’s ashamed of her religion trying to hide it behind being Methodist for political reasons.”

President Obama’s father is from Africa. His mother is a white woman from Kansas.

On her website, Haley says, “Being a Christian is not about words, but about living for Christ every day.”

Knotts, a former boxer and cop from West Columbia, said he wasn’t worried about being called a racist for the remarks he made. He says he was elected to the Senate to represent his constituents which he says he does well. He says many of his supporters are black.

“This is Jakie Knotts trying to let the people know,” he said about his motivations for leveling the inflammatory charges against a minority Republican frontrunner for governor just days before the June 8 primary elections. He says he’s called her a raghead before.

Knotts is backing Republican Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer for governor.

Bauer this week fired one of his lead consultants, Columbia lobbyist Larry Marchant, for what he called “inappropriate conduct.” Marchant told the media shortly after that he’d had sex with Haley at a conference in Utah while they were both married. The claim comes after blogger Will Folks said he’d also had a relationship with Haley in early 2007.

Knotts showed up unexpectedly at the Flying Saucer bar in Columbia’s Vista for a live taping of the online political talk show Pub Politics, which is co-hosted by Senate Republican Caucus political director Wesley Donehue and his Democratic counterpart, Phil Bailey. Democratic S.C. Rep Boyd Brown of Fairfield County was a guest.

Knotts initially made the racial slur on the show.

Neither Donehue, Bailey nor Brown challenged Knotts on his remark during or after the broadcast.

“I was floored,” Donehue said after the cameras were off.

“Senator Knotts took it a step too far,” Bailey said afterward. “I don’t agree with it … [but] it’s not my job to question Jakie Knotts.”

After the broadcast, Knotts stood in a corner on the deck of the bar and defended his remarks.

“This isn’t the first time I’ve said it,” Knotts said. “I’m not on a crusade to downgrade her, but if someone asks me I’ll tell ‘em. And look here, someone wants to vote for her knowing the truth, vote for her.”

Knotts said that South Carolina is a religious community.

“We need a good Christian to be our governor,” he said. “She’s hiding her religion. She ought to be proud of it. I’m proud of my god.”

Sorry, Jakie, but your God thinks you are a shandeh.

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Caturday
Posted by Jill | 8:19 AM
No kittens were harmed in the making of this popcorn:


Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Saturday YouTubing: Crying Boys, Pop Music, and Subliminal Mind Control
Posted by Jill | 6:21 AM
After months of a FUBAR DSL line that barely loaded pages, let alone videos, we are finally back to normal. Of course this means that The Big FIOS Decision has to be made sooner or later (and the sticking points are a) that $350 cancellation penalty for the triple play, which the tech insisted has been eliminated, and the allegedly sucky FIOS DVR, which from what I hear doesn't have the beauty of the Dish 722 that we have. You see, we record A LOT of stuff. Just the other night we sat and watched about six "Colbert Report"s in a row. If you don't think that messes with your mind, try it sometime. But the Dish DVR is a beautiful thing, with disk capacity so huge you can record enough stuff that you'll be dead before you have time to watch it, and the ability to record two things at once. The Verizon tech assured me that now Verizon's DVR does too, though I'm still skeptical.

The other thing is that Dishies tend to be almost cultish about their TV provider. Charlie Ergen operates in kind of a vacuum...sort of like Cheney only without the malevolence, death, and murder. While Cablevision is always fighting with various programming providers, Ergen does all his stuff behind the scenes. It's probably like making sausage; you don't want to know how he does it. But while Dish is still the only provider that carries FSTV, many of the Dirty Fucking Hippie channels we like -- things like Veria (until we realized they have had no new programming since 2008), Planet Green, Current, Ovation, and Palladia -- are now on FIOS as well. So while we love and are grateful to our beloved Dish for having made it possible to tell Cablevision to go fuck itself for lo these many years, the Evil V Empire may be making us an offer we can't refuse.

Anyway, now that I have the ability to watch videos, I was finally able to watch that video posted by Jesse a month ago, of the little boy in the car who's devastated because his dad tells him he can't be a single lady like Beyoncé. I must be the only person in the known universe who finds this video tragic instead of cute. Over 3 million people have viewed this video, and the family has joined that couple with the wedding dance at the confluence of YouTube notoriety and Weekday Morning Show hype. But the fact remains that at the time this occurred, the little boy's joy at being able to move to a bouncy song took second place to "OMIGOD He thinks he's a single lady...that means he must be GAY!!!!" in his father's instinctive reaction. Because even though the father quickly backtracks, the damage is done, and at the end of the video, the kid may not be actively crying, but he's clearly learned a lesson that he shouldn't have had to learn.

I kind of wish I hadn't watched it, becuase that fucking song is so catchy I can't seem to get it out of my head. But if you have to watch a video of a little kid bopping to a song that has a beat that's, as Jerry Garcia once said, "down where even white people can find it" (and there seem to be a kazillion of them, which makes me wonder what kind of weird subliminal mind control is in that song), I prefer this one:


This one has over THIRTEEN MILLION views. And I have to admit, that vaguely Bollywood-influenced dancing in the video is pretty cool. But I'm a little bit concerned about the kid in this video, because his parents are much better marketers than those of Crying Boy.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

If you think the shrimpers in the Gulf will ever see a dime from BP, guess again
Posted by Jill | 6:06 AM
Those in Alaska whose livelihoods were ruined by Exxon have yet to be paid:

Many would assume that BP—the company responsible for the Gulf Coast disaster—will cover the entire cost of cleanup. But we learned from the Exxon Valdez spill that the reality is very different:


The Exxon Valdez tanker spilled more than 11 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound, which eventually contaminated approximately 1,300 miles of shoreline. The total costs of Exxon Valdez, including both cleanup and also “fines, penalties and claims settlements,” ran as much as $7 billion. Cleanup of the affected region alone cost at least $2.5 billion, and much oil remains.


Yet Exxon made high profits even in the aftermath of the most expensive oil spill in history. They made $3.8 billion profit in 1989 and $5 billion in 1990. And this occurred while Exxon disputed cleanup costs nearly every step of the way.



Exxon fought paying damages and appealed court decisions multiple times, and they have still not paid in full. Years of fighting and court appeals on Exxon’s part finally concluded with a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2008 that found that Exxon only had to pay $507.5 million of the original 1994 court decree for $5 billion in punitive damages. And as of 2009, Exxon had paid only $383 million of this $507.5 million to those who sued, stalling on the rest and fighting the $500 million in interest owed to fishermen and other small businesses from more than 12 years of litigation.


Twenty years later, some of the original plaintiffs are no longer alive to receive, or continue fighting for, their damages. An estimated 8,000 of the original Exxon Valdez plaintiffs have died since the spill while waiting for their compensation as Exxon fought them in court.



Side note: If you aren't following "BPGlobalPR" on Twitter, you should be. "Leroy Stick" is on a roll these days.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 04, 2010

Shimes explains it all for you
Posted by Jill | 9:40 PM
My old buddy Shimes from my movie reviewing days was a voice sorely lacking for a few years while he attended taxidermy (law) school. But recently he's back, and not just talking about movies, either. You see, Shimes has the singular misfortune of being a Kansas City Royals fan, so he's in a unique position to examine the video of The Blown Call Heard Round the World as if it were the Zapruder film.

While you're over at Movie Day at the Court, bookmark it. Because when he really gets souced, Shimes writes like, well, James Joyce. No, the OTHER one.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Another step in the systematic and deliberate elimination of the middle class
Posted by Jill | 8:03 PM
If the teabaggers would stop getting their views from Fox News and Glenn Beck and look at what's around them, they'd see that the very corporations they defend under the Rich People Create Jobs Doctrine are the ones actually screwing them over.

In August 2008 I walked out the door for the last time of a job I'd held for eight years; one I'd hoped to remain in until I retired. It's not that it was a dream job; my boss had issues with me for reasons I will never understand, particularly since on that last day he said "I wish we could have done right by you." But it was close to home, the pay was good, and the benefits were fantastic. I was 53 years old. It was the scariest day of my life.

For the rest of that day, I teetered between exhilaration at what would certainly come next and sheer terror. After all, I might be 53 and fat, but I write a mean resume, I have "soft skills" up the wazoo, a master's degree, drive, guts, and moxie. On the other hand, I was a 53-year-old web developer without ASP or C# or PHP.

When I interviewed for my current job, I didn't hide that I'd been laid off. When you work on grants, if the grants run out, heads get chopped. My references were impeccable, and I actually made money on the deal, since I started work 4 weeks after my last day at the old job and had been hoarding vacation time for three years so I'd been paid for six weeks of unused vacation.

I was lucky. If I were in the same situation today, I probably wouldn't be so lucky, becauae now companies seem to be deciding that no matter why you are out of work, no matter if it wasn't your fault, no matter if your employer's management ran the company into the ground, or if the grants weren't renewed, or the company just couldn't weather the downturn, these companies don't care. To them, you are untouchable:
Still waiting for a response to the 300 resumés you sent out last month? Bad news: Some companies are ignoring all unemployed applicants.

In a current job posting on The People Place, a job recruiting website for the telecommunications, aerospace/defense and engineering industries, an anonymous electronics company in Angleton, Texas, advertises for a "Quality Engineer." Qualifications for the job are the usual: computer skills, oral and written communication skills, light to moderate lifting. But red print at the bottom of the ad says, "Client will not consider/review anyone NOT currently employed regardless of the reason."

In a nearly identical job posting for the same position on the Benchmark Electronics website, the red print is missing. But a human resources representative for the company confirmed to HuffPost that the The People Place ad accurately reflects the company's recruitment policies.

"It's our preference that they currently be employed," he said. "We typically go after people that are happy where they are and then tell them about the opportunities here. We do get a lot of applications blindly from people who are currently unemployed -- with the economy being what it is, we've had a lot of people contact us that don't have the skill sets we want, so we try to minimize the amount of time we spent on that and try to rifle-shoot the folks we're interested in."

There are about 5.5 people looking for work for every job available, according to the latest data from the Labor Department.

Sony Ericsson, a global phone manufacturer that recently announced that it would be bringing 180 new jobs to the Buckhead, Ga. area, also recently posted an ad for a marketing position on The People Place. The add specified: "NO UNEMPLOYED CANDIDATES WILL BE CONSIDERED AT ALL." When asked about the ad, a spokeswoman said, "This was a mistake, and once it was noticed it was removed."

Ads asking the unemployed not to apply are easy to find. A Craigslist ad for assistant restaurant managers in Edgewater, N.J. specifies, "Must be currently employed." Another job posting for a tax manager at an unnamed "top 25 CPA firm" in New York City contains the same line in all caps.

Most of the jobs created last month were census jobs -- temporary jobs. Businesses are just not hiring. It's not that their taxes are too high; George Bush cut taxes on businesses for eight years. It's greed, plain and simple. They are either working their existing employees to death or outsourcing the jobs to other countries. It's all part of the plan to restore this nation to what it was at the turn of the 20th centuries -- a small, preposterously wealthy "elite", and the rest of us all rabble, scrambling around for scraps.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

In a Word...

...suck my rosy red, Irish shillelagh, you fucking Limey sociopath.

Same thing goes for Lloyd Blankfein, John Thain, Jamie Dimon and every Wall Street scumbag including the "late" Ken Lay just in case he is, as I deeply suspect, sipping piña coladas in the Bush's South American hideaway in Paraguay and getting his withered knob polished by some dark-skinned 14 year-old twink.

It's some cold comfort to know that Wall Street sociopaths and other captains of industry (as in Captain Bligh) disrespect members of Congress as much as they do us. All we need do is remember the dog and pony shows more commonly referred to as Congressional testimony involving oil, auto, war profiteering and banking CEOs. One need only think back a few years to recall Erik Prince's smirk and stealing the nameplate with his own name on it and the blatant disrespect shown to senior members of Congress, most recently from the arrogantly-squinting Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs.

The BP oil spill that FDL's Michael Whitney uncharitably reminds us cruelly interrupted Tony Hayward's life (and, oh yeah, the lives of thousands of fishermen along the Gulf coast) is now virtually a planetary event, one that will very likely adversely affect roughly a quarter of the southern shoreline of the continental United States.


Yet, despite this Biblical-class fuckuppery, all BP, Transocean and Halliburton can do is act like a sandlot team pointing at everyone else when a neighbor wants to know who put a baseball through his window. Then, to show you how insatiable their greed is, they then have the nerve to petition the Canadian parliament to lift their ban on drilling in the Arctic because they don't wanna pay $100,000,000 to build the backup system that could've prevented the Gulf oil spill.

Despite overwhelming evidence that Goldman Sachs' ultra Gecko-class greed has further hollowed out what was once a prosperous nation, cost us at least 8,000,000 jobs and millions of mortgages, what does it all boil down to? "How dare you question much less threaten our capacity to grab and hoard as much money as possible?"

So, we're now almost (not quite but almost) at the tipping point where the Gorton Fisherman, Rosie the Riveter, John Q. Public, John Doe and Joe Sixpack are finally getting the message that these little freaks that have metaphorically sprung from the ossified cunt of Ayn Rand are really out to kill us or, at the very least, our deaths will be merely incidental and will not cost them one z as they snooze on fine French linen.

So what will happen when we finally do reach that tipping point and take to open rebellion, when the sheer tonnage of screaming humanity will press on their gated communities, knock down those wrought iron gates and we rip their mansions apart with our bare hands?

No one will be home because they have all that covered.

Via Mark Ames of the Smirking Chimp (they're in desperate trouble, btw, and need as much moolah as possible) is a story of cowardly greed on such a level that it reads like something out of an Ian Fleming novel rewritten by the aforementioned Ayn Rand.

Answers Ames to my question,
We finally have the answer, and you're not going to like it: a new fleet of castles that float in the oceans. The super-wealthy are already building their first floating castle, a billion-dollar-plus luxury liner that offers permanent multimillion-dollar housing with the best protection of all: moats made of oceans, keeping the land-based Americans they've plundered at a safe distance.

That's right. To paraphrase a line from The Simpsons, They'll be getting away... very slowly.

The oddly-named Utopia is the first of these private ocean liners that's being built through a consortium of sociopaths that number among its ranks the almost admirably oleaginous Frank Carlucci of CIA infamy, cyber swinger Patri Friedman, grandson of platinum medal-winning douchebag Milton Friedman, and Paypal founder Peter Thiel. Throw in some other galactic-class douchebags deeply involved in a little company that used to employ a Bush and some bin Ladens and you have the blueprint for a massive escape plan for the unlanded gentry when the long-awaited Rapture finally hits.

This ocean liner will be almost 1000 feet long. Try to imagine a slightly shorter version of a Trident-class sub or three NFL football fields and you'll get an idea of the sheer scale of the number of scumbags who will be floating away like perfumed whale shit once the planet descends into an oily, smokey, flaming, cratered nest of homicidal humanity.


It's perhaps no coincidence that this deal is being put together by some of the most sociopathic scumbags this nation's ever produced. Think of the late Dennis Hopper's character The Deacon in Waterworld, his "Smokers" safely sequestered onboard the Exxon Valdez. Now imagine twice the sociopathy only in much more opulent surroundings.

Well, Tony Hayward and every other oil CEO on the planet earth is the Deacon, intent on blotting up for himself and his Randian Remainders every last fucking drop of oil just as Goldman Sachs will not rest until they've snatched every sticky, tarnished penny from every sugar jar in America.

Then they will take off with their ill-gotten swag in floating townships that will be virtually self-sufficient. These aren't luxury yachts we're talking about here, folks, but privately-owned ocean liners that make the largest yachts bought by billionaire sheiks look like glorified tugboats. The largest yachts in the world top out at about 170 meters or roughly 525 feet and cost perhaps $330 million. These will be almost twice that length and will cost over a billion dollars.

Why would anyone spend that much loot on a ship unless they were planning on spending the rest of their lives on it? A ship that size could virtually support its own economy with a permanent servant class that could accommodate a compliment of thousands of only the wealthiest 1/10th of the wealthiest 1%. And several of these are being built.

Imagine the Titanic minus the thousands of poor Irish in steerage. Then imagine Spartacus starring the servant class and you have the ultimate revenge tale. So, if you want a piece of this piratical plunder, start scanning Craigslist for some ocean liner jobs in the next year or two.
Bookmark and Share

It can be hard to step outside your own baggage, but sometimes it's necessary
Posted by Jill | 6:40 AM
When you grow up in a family where you're not "the pretty one", and you learn early on that "pretty" is more valuable currency than "smart" or "funny", especially when "pretty" is also "musically talented" and "just as smart as you are", it can be hard to step outside that particular little dance.

I was estranged from my sister for many, many years. I don't even know why anymore, except that I knew she was "the pretty one", and through the filter of my own short, constantly weight-challenged misery, things always seemed to be so easy for her. Of course like most filters, it distorted the truth, and in many ways she was more unhappy than I was. But in the currency which so often matters to the exclusion of all else -- the realm of male attention -- it was easy for her.

In the last ten years we've often had opportunities to talk this out, and it will pain me to my grave that she spent all those years with hurt feelings that she always felt (sometimes rightly) that I hated her and she never knew why. I hope she reads this and knows how much I regret those lost years.

One of the things about aging, provided you aren't obsessed about beating a clock that can't be beat, is that it's the great equalizer. No matter how much Botox or plastic surgery you have, you are going to get old. If you have too much of it, you end up like Joan Rivers, who looks neither young nor old, but just masque-like. At some point we have to become comfortable in our own skins.

But when you're young, if every time you WALK PAST a bakery, even without going in, y ou gain five pounds, "pretty girls" just piss you off. And the problem with this is that the way extremely attractive women are treated is, in its own way, just as bad as the way we "funny ones" are treated.

Take the case of Debrahlee Lorenzana, who is filing suit against Citibank, alleging that she was fired for being "too attractive." The fourteen-year-old that still lives in my head sometimes wants to think "I wish I had such problems," until I remember that the fact that I am under five feet tall and more often in my life overweight than not has never prevented me from getting jobs, and that I have only been harassed in anything approaching this way once in my life (and it was the catalyst that got me out of the hell of retail department management).

But while invisibility may not seem like a blessing when you're young, reading about Debbie Lorenzana makes me think it wasn't so bad after all:
This is the way Debbie Lorenzana tells it: Her bosses told her they couldn't concentrate on their work because her appearance was too distracting. They ordered her to stop wearing turtlenecks. She was also forbidden to wear pencil skirts, three-inch heels, or fitted business suits. Lorenzana, a 33-year-old single mom, pointed out female colleagues whose clothing was far more revealing than hers: "They said their body shapes were different from mine, and I drew too much attention," she says.

As Lorenzana's lawsuit puts it, her bosses told her that "as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly 'too distracting' for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear."

"Men are kind of drawn to her," says Tanisha Ritter, a friend and former colleague who also works as a banker and praises Lorenzana's work habits. "I've seen men turn into complete idiots around her. But it's not her fault that they act this way, and it shouldn't be her problem."

Because Citibank made Lorenzana sign a mandatory-arbitration clause as a condition of her employment, the case will never end up before a jury or judge. An arbitrator will decide. Citibank officials won't comment on the suit.

Her attorney, Jack Tuckner, who calls himself a "sex-positive" women's-rights lawyer, is the first one to say his client is a babe. But so what? For him, it all boils down to self-control. "It's like saying," Tuckner argues, "that we can't think anymore 'cause our penises are standing up—and we cannot think about you except in a sexual manner—and we can't look at you without wanting to have sexual intercourse with you. And it's up to you, gorgeous woman, to lessen your appeal so that we can focus!"

This isn't your typical sexual-harassment lawsuit, if there is such a thing. For one thing, such suits often claim that women are coerced into looking more sexy or are subjected to being pawed. Lorenzana claims that her bosses basically told her she was just too attractive. And when she raised hell and refused to do anything about it—as if there was anything she really could do about it—she lost her job.

[snip]

Citibank does have a dress-code policy, which says clothing must not be provocative, but does not go into specifics, and managers have wide discretion. But Lorenzana points out that, unlike her, some of the tellers dressed in miniskirts and low-cut blouses. "And when they bend down," Lorenzana says, "anyone can see what God gave them!"

Then the managers gave her a list of clothing items she would not be allowed to wear: turtlenecks, pencil skirts, and fitted suits. And three-inch heels. "As a result of her tall stature, coupled with her curvaceous figure," her suit says, Lorenzana was told "she should not wear classic high-heeled business shoes, as this purportedly drew attention to her body in a manner that was upsetting to her easily distracted male managers."

"I couldn't believe what I was hearing," Lorenzana recalls. "I said, 'You gotta be kidding me!' I was like, 'Too distracting? For who? For you? My clients don't seem to have any problem.' "

The managers instructed her to wear looser clothing. Lorenzana refused. "I don't have the money to buy a new wardrobe," she says, referring to her work outfits. "I shop where everyone else shops—at Zara!" Lorenzana recalls leaving the meeting feeling humiliated. Other female employees "were able to wear such clothing because they were short, overweight, and they didn't draw much attention," she later wrote in a letter describing the meeting to Human Resources, "but since I was five-foot-six, 125 pounds, with a figure, it wasn't 'appropriate.' " She was also furious. "Are you saying that just because I look this way genetically, that this should be a curse for me?"

Based on this article, which is admittedly Lorenzana's side only, it does seem that because men at Citibank are creatures so primitive that they can't get their brains out of their dicks for even eight hours a day while at work, someone who does a perfectly good job was unable to keep it. This is something I have never had to deal with, and after reading this article, I feel fortunate that I haven't.

Yes, I've had to deal with more-attractive women getting better projects and being favored by the boss. I've also seen more-attractive women in the same place being treated less well than I was. I work with a woman, now in her mid-thirties, whom I've known for ten years. We worked together in a previous job. When she started at our current place of employment, it was as if Angelina Jolie had joined the company. And watching men talk to her, they look ridiculous much of the time. But she frets constantly about her looks, and the fretting becomes more intense as she gets older. I'm kind of glad I never had to go through that.

Our culture's obsession with how women look is about more than primitive biology worming its way into the culture. As long as thin women are encouraged to feel superior to fat ones, or older women feel threatened by younger ones, or attractive women feel threatened by men who can't keep their brains in their craniums where they belong, women will remain at war with each other. And with us being 52% of the population, it behooves the existing power structure to keep us that way. Because if we ever realized that the issues we face are often two sides of the same coin, there'd be no stopping us.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, June 03, 2010

And this guy is supposed to be a potential presidential candidate?
Posted by Jill | 9:37 PM
I'd be tempted to say that the people of Mississippi deserve Haley Barbour, because enough of them voted for him to elect him. But I'm not sure ANYONE, even the most willfully ignorant Fox News dittohead deserves THIS much of a nitwit scumbag corporatist oil-engorged whore:

"This is the first significant amount of oil residue to hit Mississippi since the Deepwater Horizon explosion six weeks ago," Gov. Haley Barbour said. "While it's the first, it won't be the last."

During a news conference in Jackson on Tuesday, Barbour said this is no reason for "anybody to panic." The state's beaches and ports remain open, and Barbour said, "We're told that it's not toxic."

"But it is a reason for everybody to remember that there is a likelihood that there is going to be more intrusion of some form of depleted oil, tar balls, tar mats, emulsified oil, that's going to reach the barrier islands," Barbour said.

Barbour said it appears the strand broke off Sunday from a patch of emulsified sheen situated some 11 miles off Mississippi's Horn Island.

The strand that came ashore Petit Bois had sunk slightly below sea level, and it went undetected in flyovers on Monday, he said.

Barbour said state officials have asked the Coast Guard to increase the number of vessels testing for oil sheens below the surface.

"I'm not blaming anybody or criticizing anybody," Barbour said of the fact it was not detected before washing onto Petit Bois, the easternmost of Mississippi's barrier islands, located near the Alabama border.

"We all understand that we should have found that this oil had broken off from the rest before this (Tuesday) morning," the governor said.


Yeah, Haley. Just keep adding more cowbell to drown out reality. That'll do it.




(via)

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

The Day in Crazy
Posted by Jill | 8:52 PM
Today's crazy comes from new Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle, who has taken the lead over Sue "Chicken" Lowden. Angle, an avid tea partier, has all but threatened assassination of the President by one of her frothing, mindless minions (emphasis mine):
"We're called as Americans to be vigilant to protect our liberty," she said in a recent interview. "At some point in each of our lives, we're called to service to defend and protect our Constitution."

In Angle's eyes, the country is under attack and she's willing to go to battle.

"What is a little bit disconcerting and concerning is the inability for sporting goods stores to keep ammunition in stock," she said. "That tells me the nation is arming. What are they arming for if it isn't that they are so distrustful of their government? They're afraid they'll have to fight for their liberty in more Second Amendment kinds of ways?

"That's why I look at this as almost an imperative. If we don't win at the ballot box, what will be the next step?"

What indeed. Why don't you tell us, Sharron? We're all ears.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Now she's the Chicken and Soft-Core Porn lady
Posted by Jill | 6:08 AM
Sue Lowden, the woman who romanticizes a past not even her grandmother remembers when people would trade chickens for medical treatment (which often as not at that time probably involved leeches and poultices), is now the face behind this soft-coreish ad that's obsessed with coddling prisoners:



The mind of a Republican is a very scary place

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Today's post you must read
Posted by Jill | 5:59 AM
"Gaius Publius" has almost singlehandedly made Americablog readable again. It's fortunate, because I for one got rather sick of Chris Ryan's relentless "blame the Boomers" rants. I mean, Ryan has a really nice life in Paris, something of which he reminds us all the time, so I have no idea where his bitterness comes from. But this new guy (or gal, as the case may be), ought to be required reading for every teabagger who gets his or her opinions from Fox News.

Today "Gaius" writes about the relationship between state and capitalism -- and makes the case why what we have right now is dangerously close to "The F Word".

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

It's almost enough to make you think the rig was blown up on purpose
Posted by Jill | 5:24 AM
After reading this article in today's New York Times, I'm almost wondering if the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion was somehow deliberate. After all, how better to hijack a Democratic President's agenda:
Mr. Obama had hoped to spend his summer creating jobs, passing financial reform, promoting his health care program, getting a Supreme Court justice confirmed and an arms control treaty with Russia ratified, pressing for international sanctions against Iran and jump-starting the troubled Middle East peace process. While not abandoning any of those goals, Mr. Obama now must find ways to continue pushing them while demonstrating to the nation that he is concentrating on a spill he has called “our highest priority.”

“This has hijacked his entire legislative agenda,” said Douglas Brinkley, a historian at Rice University who has written about Jimmy Carter, whose presidency was consumed by the Iran hostage crisis. “The White House felt they were on a roll. They were looking to be a new New Deal or new Great Society and they were just getting momentum going. Something this awful has sidetracked the agenda.”

Sara Taylor Fagen, White House political director under President George W. Bush, said the failure to contain the spill would make it hard for Mr. Obama to accomplish anything this year. “He’ll likely be managing the fallout for years to come,” she said. “Not until his re-election campaign will he have an opportunity to press reset.”

Republicans couldn't have asked for something politically better for themselves if they, well, planned for it.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Wednesday, June 02, 2010

A big Christmas gift wrapped in shiny paper and a bow, from BP
Posted by Jill | 2:40 PM
In the worsT case scenario (which given BP's track record so far, seems increasingly likely, oil will be gushing from the wreck of the Deepwater Horizon rig until CHRISTMAS:
BP Plc’s failure since April to plug a Gulf of Mexico oil leak has prompted forecasts the crude may continue gushing into December in what President Barack Obama has called the greatest environmental disaster in U.S. history.

BP’s attempts so far to cap the well and plug the leak on the seabed a mile below the surface haven’t worked, while the start of the Atlantic hurricane season this week indicates storms in the Gulf may disrupt other efforts.

“The worst-case scenario is Christmas time,” Dan Pickering, the head of research at energy investor Tudor Pickering Holt & Co. in Houston, said. “This process is teaching us to be skeptical of deadlines.”

Ending the year with a still-gushing well would mean about 4 million barrels of oil spilled into the Gulf, based on the government’s current estimate of 12,000 to 19,000 barrels leaking a day. That would wipe out marine life deep at sea near the leak and elsewhere in the Gulf, and along hundreds of miles of coastline, said Harry Roberts, a professor of Coastal Studies at Louisiana State University.

So much crude pouring into the ocean may alter the chemistry of the sea, with unforeseeable results, said Mak Saito, an Associate Scientist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.

Somehow I don't think "clean water and healthy sea life" is one of those results. What's unforeseeable is whether BP has singlehandedly destroyed the world's entire marine ecosystem or just most of it.

Meanwhile, Wasilla, Alaska's designated Village Idiot, Evita Mooselini continues to say "Drill, baby drill":
Extreme Greenies:see now why we push"drill,baby,drill"of known reserves&promising finds in safe onshore places like ANWR? Now do you get it?

I recommend we drill right in her backyard. You know, next to the fence she built to keep out Big Bad Joe McGinniss.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Pray for the Rachel Corrie

Considering how peppy and alert the Israelis have proven to be regarding the dangerous peace activists, perhaps we ought to hire them to intercept the oil spill off the Gulf Coast. After all, if they could intercept seven ships well outside their 68 mile exclusion zone, they should've had no problem stopping an oil slick that began only 40 miles from Louisiana. All we have to do is convert New Orleans' mostly Baptist residents to Judaism and Israel will be there in a flash.

There's another showdown brewing off the coast of Gaza between the Rachel Corrie MV, the sole ship in the flotilla that was carrying 10 tons of aid to the Palestinians, and the US-funded Israeli terrorist network. Undeterred and more determined than ever, the ship carrying Malaysian and Irish aid workers are moving their way toward the Gaza strip in defiance of Israel's brutal and possibly even illegal embargo of relief supplies.

And in spite of nearly universal international condemnation, the Israeli terrorists have vowed to be even more brutal when they intercept the Rachel Corrie. Meanwhile, Turkey has promised to dispatch two more aid ships to Palestine except this time, they'll be accompanied by Turkish naval vessels.

We now know the Israeli Marines who rappelled onto the boats like wouldbe ninjas began firing on the flotilla and the hands aboard it even before they boarded. We know that the Israelis disabled the communications satellite, thereby jamming cell phones and preventing the besieged aid workers from calling for help.

We now know that 19 aid workers (not one or two or nine, but 19) were murdered and at least 60 were injured in the predawn invasion of the flotilla in which six ships and several hundreds of men, women and children were apprehended and taken hostage to Ashdod. During their detention, the prisoners complained that they were denied food, water, sleep and even bathroom facilities.

Yet to hear the "liberal" media talk about it, Jewish journalists like Joshua Mitnick and Amy Teibel have described Israel's release of their hostages as "expelling" and "deporting" the "activists".

In fact, Teibel even engages in a daring bit of revisionist history by informing us that "Hamas militants violently seized power in June 2007", not that they were lawfully elected during Palestine's elections. Oy vey. No pro-Israel bias there, folks.

What Mitnick and Teibel fail to adequately explain is how it's possible to deport from Israel hundreds of aid workers who were on their way not to Israel but the Gaza Strip on a humanitarian aid mission and were apprehended more than 68 miles from Israel's shores (well outside the exclusion zone, in international waters) and forcibly held in detention facilities. As of now, despite the release of hundreds of prisoners, well over 100 aid workers remain behind bars simply for trying to do the right thing by countering Israeli thuggery and genocide.

We could do the right thing and support the Turkish navy and help the aid workers by dispatching our own naval vessels. But of course Obama won't do that because the out-of-control Zionist zombies running the Knesset will consider that an act of war. It's an unspoken rule in Washington: Israel dictates our foreign policy in the Middle East, always has and always will. It's a classic case of the pint-sized bully, overcompensating for prior abuse, running the playground.

However, the Turks are one of Israel's few Muslim allies yet they've shown the intestinal fortitude to get their military involved. Many nationalities were represented in the flotilla and we also had our own people on board. In fact, one of them was Ann Wright, a former US diplomat.

To give you an idea of how insane Israel is, even the equally draconian Egyptian government, they of the torture palaces, actually relaxed their embargo and had briefly opened their borders to Palestinians wishing to flee or seek medical aid. Here's a partial list of some the relief supplies banned by Israel (It seems to be anything beginning with the letter "C"): Coriander. Coffee. Chocolate.

And Cement.

According to David Frum, cement has been rightfully banned because it could be used to (gasp) make bunkers (presumably the coffee would keep them up all night making those evil bunkers and the coriander and chocolate would make it a tastier, more pleasant experience). And we all know that the Palestinians shouldn't have any cause to fear their Israeli friends, don't we?

Labels: , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Mr. Kirk, your pants are on fire
Posted by Jill | 5:53 AM
His military record appears to not be the only thing about which Mark Kirk is lying.

(Oh spare me your "hearsay" nonsense. This is what Mike Rogers does. And he has not been wrong yet.)

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, June 01, 2010

Maybe this is why women's sports get no respect
Posted by Jill | 1:36 PM
Because women make men look like boors.

This morning I received from a friend one of those forwarded e-mails that we all hate. You know, the ones in 36-point type that tell some story (which usually turns out to be false or at best apocryphal) that's supposed to warm your heart and guilt you into forwarding it along to your own e-mail list, thereby perpetuating the spam forever. It's a lovely story, but it may or may not even be true. Parables are fine, but parables sold as truth are something else entirely.

But sometimes we don't need to rely on the One Percent Doctrine to get all warm and fuzzy. Sometimes the stories are true:
We live in a world where Peyton Manning walks off the Super Bowl field without shaking anybody's hand. Where Tiger Woods leaves the Masters without a word of thanks to the fans or congratulations to the winner. Where NFL lineman Albert Haynesworth kicks a man's helmetless head without a thought.

So if you think sportsmanship is toast, this next story is an all-you-can-eat buffet to a starving man.

It happened at a junior varsity girls' softball game in Indianapolis this spring. After an inning and a half, Roncalli was womanhandling inner-city Marshall Community. Marshall pitchers had already walked nine Roncalli batters. The game could've been 50-0 with no problem.

It's no wonder. This was the first softball game in Marshall history. A middle school trying to move up to include grades 6 through 12, Marshall showed up to the game with five balls, two bats, no helmets, no sliding pads, no cleats, 16 players who'd never played before, and a coach who'd never even seen a game.

One Marshall player asked, "Which one is first base?" Another: "How do I hold this bat?" They didn't know where to stand in the batter's box. Their coaches had to be shown where the first- and third-base coaching boxes were.

That's when Roncalli did something crazy. It offered to forfeit.

Yes, a team that hadn't lost a game in 2½ years, a team that was going to win in a landslide purposely offered to declare defeat. Why? Because Roncalli wanted to spend the two hours teaching the Marshall girls how to get better, not how to get humiliated.

"The Marshall players did NOT want to quit," wrote Roncalli JV coach Jeff Traylor, in recalling the incident. "They were willing to lose 100 to 0 if it meant they finished their first game." But the Marshall players finally decided if Roncalli was willing to forfeit for them, they should do it for themselves. They decided that maybe -- this one time -- losing was actually winning.

That's about when the weirdest scene broke out all over the field: Roncalli kids teaching Marshall kids the right batting stance, throwing them soft-toss in the outfield, teaching them how to play catch. They showed them how to put on catching gear, how to pitch, and how to run the bases. Even the umps stuck around to watch.

More...

In a world where even the gentlest of sports uses metaphors for war, and one in which the arts and even academics often get short shrift in favor of men's school sports that favor players who believe not just in winning, but in pummeling the opposition into a pulp, here's a bunch of girls who take the idea that sports are about teamwork seriously.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Are the American people able to add 2 + 2 and get 4?
Posted by Jill | 6:13 AM
It would seem not.

Glendale, California:
Holiday travel on the rebound

DOWNTOWN — Thousands of area residents renewed travel regimens this Memorial Day weekend, pouring onto highways and into airports as the nation officially ushered in the summer travel season.

Be it falling gas prices, enticing hotel and car rental rates or a slight uptick in consumer confidence, the Southland was expected to see nearly an 8% increase in the number of residents traveling over the holiday weekend, according to the Automobile Club of Southern California.


Denver, Colorado:
Memorial Day weekend brings lower gas prices in Denver

Gas prices in Denver have dropped a few cents this week as motorists fuel up for Memorial Day weekend driving.

The price of a gallon of regular gas in Denver costs an average of $2.636 cents Friday, down from $2.68 a week earlier, according to the American Automobile Association's Daily Fuel Gauge Report.

Mid-grade gas averages $2.819 in Denver on Friday, while premium is $2.946 and diesel is $2.984 -- all a few cents below prices of a week ago.


Everett, Washington:

Expect heavier traffic during holiday weekend

Traffic for the entire holiday weekend is expected to increase compared to last year.

It’s the first time since 2005 that experts anticipate heavier Memorial Day weekend volumes on the region’s highways and roads.

About 4.3 million people say they plan to travel by automobile in the West Coast states, according to AAA of Washington.


Columbus, Ohio:

AAA forecast: Cheaper gas, more travelers over Memorial Day

The American Automobile Association is projecting Memorial Day weekend travel to increase by more than 5 percent this year, fueled by lower gas prices.

About 32 million Americans will travel over the weekend, compared with 30.5 million last year, AAA said. More than 1.1 million Ohioans will travel 50 miles or more, up from 1 million a year ago.

A recent decline in gas prices is a key factor in the expected upswing in drivers hitting the road, AAA said. Regular gas prices in the Columbus area on Friday averaged $2.48 a gallon, down from $2.76 a month ago and below $2.60 in the same weekend last year. Average gas prices across the state were at $2.55 a gallon, unchanged from a year ago.


New Jersey:

N.J. gasoline prices drop in time for Memorial Day weekend travels

New Jerseyans can travel to their picnics, beaches and Memorial Day ceremonies this weekend on fuel that is much less expensive than originally feared.

Despite dire predictions earlier in the year that gas would hit $3 a gallon this weekend — the unofficial start of summer — the average price for a gallon of regular gas in New Jersey fell 11 cents over the last three weeks, from $2.81 to $2.70.

That paralleled a national drop from $2.92 to $2.78.

Consequently, AAA of New Jersey is forecasting a 7.5 percent increase in the number of New Jerseyans traveling more than 50 miles from home this Memorial Day, compared to last year. At the same time, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority expects about a 2.5 percent traffic increase on both the Turnpike and Garden State Parkway.

"We have indications from our businesses that reservations are good," said Diane Wieland, Cape May County’s director of tourism. "It’s been one cold winter and we keep hearing that people can’t wait to get out and do something fun."


"...people can't wait to get out and do something fun."

Do you think THESE people are having fun?
Local shrimpers helping the cleanup effort in Louisiana are reporting health problems after a plane spraying chemical dispersants on the oil spill passed within a mile of their boats. They claim that despite attending classes on petroleum waste management, they were not given protective gear, and are still using their old fishing boots.
BP responded that it is conducting constant air quality studies, and they appear to be within safe limits.

Another group of relief workers were taken to a New Orleans hospital, after bouts of nausea, vomiting, and severe headaches, in spite of having been properly trained and wearing protective gear. The hospital said they had been exposed to some unknown irritant.


As is his wont, BP's chairman, Tony Blair lookalike Tony Hayward, who is rapidly replacing Lloyd Blankfein in the public consciousness as the poster child for corporate scumbaggery and who is sure to be played by Michael Sheen in the movie, blames the workers' illness on food poisoning.

Even Joey the Intern Killer Scarborough has been reduced to agreeing with Ed Schultz about this guy, who was quoted this weekend as saying that no one wants this situation resolved more than he does so he can "get his life back", noting that the shrimpers and fishermen of the Gulf coast will never, ever get THEIRS back.

But while Americans were going away with Lucille in the 21st century equivalents of their grandfathers' Merry Oldsmobiles, how many do you think put together the fuel they used going to the beach with what is happening in the Gulf of Mexico?

I graduated high school in the middle of the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo, and graduated college in the middle of the 1977 one. I remember waking up early on my odd or even day and waiting in line for an hour for gasoline. That was over thirty years ago, and despite that energy crisis, the Exxon Valdez, $4 gasoline two summers ago, thousands of dead American soldiers in the service of the Bush family's (and others') oil interests -- soldiers who were largely forgotten yesterday amidst the sun and surf and zeppoles and Kohls Frozen Custard -- we still insist that the gas pump will always be working and that nothing bad happens to get that petroleum from its source to the SUVs that far too many Americans still insist is their birthright to drive.

What will it take before we learn? I realize that stupidity is now regarded in this country as a virtue, as evidenced by the rise of the almost incomprehensibly idiotic Sarah Palin, but have we become so mindless that we can no longer even add 2 + 2?

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share