"Only dull people are brilliant at breakfast"
-Oscar Wilde
Brilliant at Breakfast title banner "The liberal soul shall be made fat, and he that watereth, shall be watered also himself."
-- Proverbs 11:25
"...you have a choice: be a fighting liberal or sit quietly. I know what I am, what are you?" -- Steve Gilliard, 1964 - 2007
"Next time I tell you someone from Texas should not be president of the United States, please pay attention." -- Molly Ivins, 1944-2007

Over 7000 8000(!!!) Posts and over 1,000,000 pages served

"For straight up monster-stomping goodness, nothing makes smoke shoot out my ears like Brilliant@Breakfast" -- Tata
"...the best bleacher bum since Pete Axthelm" -- Randy K.
Wednesday, October 07, 2009

If the Republicans keep this up there won't be anyone left to support them
Posted by Jill | 9:28 PM
Let's see, they've alienated Black and Latino Americans already, and today they may have just eliminated the women:
“General Pelosi has no problem sacrificing her own credibility as the Obama administration and liberals in Congress attempt to walk back a strategy they strongly advocated just months ago,” said NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain. “Nancy Pelosi continues to make party politics a higher priority than our national security. Rather than listening to a four-star general’s assessments on Afghanistan, General Pelosi somehow believes she is better suited to craft our country’s military policy.”

If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.

Yes, folks, this is the Republicans' new theme song for its female outreach:


Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Al Franken: Good Senator, or GREAT Senator?
Posted by Jill | 5:17 AM
I can't help but compare the early days of Senator Al Franken to the early days of Senator Barack Obama. Barack Obama sat on his hands rather than stand up for the black citizens of Ohio who were denied the chance to vote in the 2004 election and chose Joe Lieberman has his mentor. Yesterday Al Franken spoke about his amendment to the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act that would:
prohibit the use of funds for any Federal contract with Halliburton Company, KBR, Inc., any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, or any other contracting party if such contractor or a subcontractor at any tier under such contract requires that employees or independent contractors sign mandatory arbitration clauses regarding certain claims.



Franken's amendment specifically removes the free pass that the Cheney Administration gave to the company in which former Vice President had a significant financial interest. The amendment passed 68-30 yesterday.

One of the "Nay" votes came from Mr. Maverick himself, John McCain, who obviously thinks that KBR should be able to electrocute soldiers and give them tainted water, and allow its male employees to rape its female employees.

(h/t)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Every now and then, MoDo makes some sense...and then blows it
Posted by Jill | 4:49 AM
The tragedy of Maureen Dowd is that underneath that veneer of "prettiest girl in high school" that she usually affects, which makes her seem far too often like the Norma Desmond of op-ed columnists, there's actually a smart, incisive social commentator in there.

I haven't commented on the whole David Letterman foofarah, because there's a certain "man bites dog" quality to the whole thing: rich, powerful, famous man beds younger women who work for him. This is news?

Why isn't this story about Joe Halderman, the 48 Hours producer who blackmailed Letterman? Why is extortion given a free pass? Why is having sex regarded as the real crime here?

I read somewhere once, and it's always stuck with me, that David Letterman gives the impression of someone who doesn't exist outside of his TV show. For all that he used to have his mother on the show fairly often, there was always a Max Headroom quality to Letterman. And perhaps that's why there's this obsession now with his sex life -- it's like finding out that your parents have sex; except that instead of responding with "Ew!", the press leans in and says "Tell me more..."

To say that a famous person's sex life is none of my business is not to excuse or condone it. But there's a certain "goes with the territory" aspect to the parade of Men Behaving Badly, whether it's Wade Boggs taking his mistress on the road with the Red Sox, or A-Rod "reading Kaballah" with Madonna, or, well, David Letterman fucking his staffers. I would say that the vapors being had over men like Mark Sanford and John Ensign are preposterous too, were it not for these men setting themselves up as the moral arbiters of the sexual behavior (and consequences of that behavior) of others while demanding a free pass for himself. Men like John Edwards and Newt Gingrich are in a class by themselves for the sheer scumminess of cheating on a cancer-stricken wife. But for the rest? Yeah, it sucks to be the wife, but unfortunately, the world is and always has been full of groupies of both sexes.

But today MoDo is right that equating consensual sex between two adults with drugging and raping every orifice of a thirteen-year-old says something extremely creepy about our attitude towards women; far more creepy than anything David Letterman did:
After David Letterman acknowledged that he’d had flings with young assistants, some commentators talked about it in the same breath as Roman Polanski, who drugged and sodomized a 13-year-old. That’s outrageous.

Sexual harassment entails pressuring or penalizing a staffer or making the office atmosphere hostile. Despite the blustering of the attorney of the alleged execrable extortionist, Joe Halderman, there’s no evidence yet that Letterman was guilty of that.

Working for a boss as anti-social and self-critical as Letterman, whose world is circumscribed by his show, would not be easy. (The man is obviously not joking when he goes off on his self-loathing shticks; otherwise, he would have dated some of those gorgeous actresses flirting with him on air over the decades.)

But we haven’t heard that the curmudgeonly comedian, who has never lost his streak of Midwest primness, forced any staffers to listen to tales of pubic hairs on Cokes or Long Dong Silver.

From what we know so far, and that may not be everything, the women who got involved with Letterman were not pressured. One former intern, Holly Hester, said she had wanted to marry him but that he broke it off because of their age disparity.

Stephanie Birkitt, his former lover and assistant, described herself as his best friend. She was not punished but rewarded with a recurring on-air starring role — despite the fact that she wasn’t funny or charming. As usual, Letterman was living out loud on the show, showing the audience his crush. His company footed the tab for Birkitt to go to law school, a loan she has now paid back; it says it did the same for some other staffers who wanted to pursue higher education.

On Monday night, when Letterman joked that he might be the first talk-show host to be impeached, Birkitt’s name was still listed in the show credits.

Of course then she goes on to end the piece with yet another swipe at Bill Clinton, her obsession with whom goes back nearly two decades, as if she's still mad at him for not thinking she's the cutest girl around. But her point about trusting the bond with the public to tell the truth has little to do with how one handles such matters. As Letterman ruefully pointed out the other night, he may end up as the first talk show host to be impeached. But there is a difference between being an entertainer with an active, if sleazy, private life and being a president, or an aspiring one. The presidency comes with a certain moral authority, or at least it's supposed to. Yes, morality involves more than where a man puts his dick, but the American desire for the Beer Buddy President hasn't yet entirely precluded our desire to be able to look up to him. No one, least of all David Letterman himself, would ever advise telling children to be just like him.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, October 06, 2009

It's about time someone took Betsey McCaughey to task
Posted by Jill | 9:22 PM
For months Betsy McCaughey has been doing the talk show circuit, armed with her Big Book and her voice training that allows her to filibuster just about anyone. She filibustered Jon Stewart into the ground. Take a look at Dylan Ratigan and Rep. Anthony Weiner debunking every bogus claim this insurance industry lobbyist makes, while she screeches "Unfair!" and plays the damsel in distress card:



This woman has never let anyone else get a word in edgewise when she appears on talk shows. She speaks with authority and filibusters and thinks that if she just spouts her crap loudly enough and long enough, it will be come truth. As Michelle Cottle notes at The New Republic:
Yes, McCaughey professes to have read the legislation currently circulating, and, as in 1994, she brandishes that fact like a talisman that can dispel any conflicting viewpoint. But, also as in 1994, she spins out an indefensibly sinister, apocalyptic translation of the text that no amount of countervailing evidence can shake. Thus, health care adviser Emanuel's theoretical writings about how to allocate scarce resources, such as human organs, morph into McCaughey's conviction that Obama's "deadly doctor" advocates denying treatment to the elderly and infirm on cost-benefit grounds. Likewise, a database to coordinate information on which treatments work best for which patients--an initiative supported by wonks across the political spectrum--is seen by McCaughey as the first step toward government-programmed computers ordering doctors how to do their jobs. Within the self-styled empiricist resides the mind of a pathological alarmist.

Asked why her analysis bears no resemblance to that of other experts regardless of ideology, McCaughey consistently responds, "My reading of the bills is correct." Even when it is pointed out that her interpretation is clearly hyperbolic--e.g., her fantastic assertion on Fred Thompson's radio show that "Congress would make it mandatory, absolutely require, that, every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner"--she will not budge. Ironically, her familiarity with the data, combined with her unrecognizable interpretation of it, makes it nearly impossible to combat McCaughey's claims in a traditional debate. Her standard m.o. (as "Daily Show" host Jon Stewart recently experienced) is to greet each bit of contradictory evidence by insisting that her questioner is poorly informed and should take a closer look at paragraph X or footnote Z. When those sections don't support her interpretation, she continues to throw out page numbers and footnotes until the mountain of data is so high as to obscure the fact that none of the numbers add up to what she has claimed. "It's impossible to keep up with the quantity of misinformation," laments Henry Aaron. "It's like being sprayed with muddy water."

And so far it's worked for her -- until today. Dylan Ratigan may be a bully, but Betsy McCaughey is his equal in bullying, except that Ratigan is trying to get a truthful answer out of this purveyer of horseshit, and McCaughey is trying equally hard to avoid giving one -- and to protect the industry she so dearly loves against the marauding hordes of ordinary American citizens.

More from Michael Stickings and Kate Harding.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

I'm starting to really like Germany
Posted by Jill | 5:02 AM
As regular readers know, I made 2 trips to Germany this summer on business. These were my first transatlantic journeys -- something I'm not proud of given that I am over 50. But for decades, my attitude towards vacation was that I didn't want to spend it shlepping around, I wanted to sit on a balcony and drink coffee and read and look at water and swim and eat fresh food in a tropical setting. Now that I'm older, and bathing suits are more of an issue than ever, this model of travel has become less appealing and now I'm starting to want to see things as part of my bucket list. So I was fortunate to be able to travel to Cologne and Berlin this summer.

Because these are work trips which involve a fair amount of time spent with German colleagues, I've been able to learn more about the country's mindset than I would otherwise. But even in the touristy things I've been able to do, what strikes me most about Germany is how it has come to terms with the less savory aspects of its history in a way the U.S. probably never will. You are unlikely to ever see a "slavery museum" in the south, for all that there is an effort to create one in Washington, DC; one you don't hear much about and probably never will. When you look at the embrace of the Confederate flag in much of the south, it's hard to imagine that there will ever be a building containing oral histories from freed slaves about how they were treated. I'm not sure that even Roots would be made today without a great deal of hue and cry from the Usual Suspects in Congress. And when Glenn Beck is paid millions of dollars to spew the bile of slavery revisionist W. Cleon Skousen over the airwaves, we are a long way from coming to terms with slavery in the U.S.

And for all that there is a museum of sorts to the Topaz internment camp in Utah, commemorating the Japanese internment during World War II, there is hardly a national effort, despite George H.W. Bush's apology to the camps' survivors in 1991, to keep the Japanese internment in the national consciousness.

Germany's Holocaust memorial is right there in Berlin -- the country's capital -- right by the Reichstag. This is not a country that's flinching from its history. And yet, Germans don't define themselves by that history. I used to think, in my ignorance, that there was something in the German temperament that made them somehow more susceptible to the kind of leader that would create the Third Reich, with the ordered society in which you can get a ticket for jaywalking, no one crosses against the light even if there is no oncoming traffic, and the 8:37 S6 train really DOES show up at the Köln Hauptbahnhof at 8:37. But I think we've seen throughout history, and there are even pockets among the extreme right in our country, that when people's economic condition goes downhill, it's human, rather than German, nature to respond with fear and loathing and scapegoating. It is to Germany's credit that they keep a reminder around -- just in case.

In a smaller and less significant context of Things Germany Does That Just Seem Right comes this story about a popular German women's magazine whose publishers have decided that they are no longer going to use anorexic models that don't look like any of its readers:
"From 2010 we will not work with professional models any more," said Andreas Lebert, editor-in-chief, adding that he was "fed up" with having to retouch pictures of underweight models who bore no resemblance to ordinary women.

"For years we've had to use Photoshop to fatten the girls up," he said. "Especially their thighs, and decolletage. But this is disturbing and perverse and what has it got to do with our real reader?"

He said the move was a response to complaints by readers who said they had no connection with the women depicted in fashion features and "no longer wanted to see protruding bones".

"Today's models weigh around 23% less than normal women," Lebert said. "The whole model industry is anorexic."

Brigitte, which is Germany's best-selling women's title with more than 700,000 copies, offers readers a familiar diet of fitness, lifestyle, recipes and sex, which tends to appeal to upwardly mobile younger career women.

Lebert said the magazine would call on German women to put themselves forward as models for fashion and makeup articles.

Recently a plus-size model (she's a size 12-14, hardly a sumo wrestler) named Lizzie Miller dared to be photographed for Glamour magazine showing a belly pooch, and you'd have thought the world was coming to an end. And there's no sea change afoot, look at the kind of image Ralph Lauren's ad agency thinks is attractive. (Put down the pen device, and close up Photoshop, dude, and nobody gets hurt.)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

And herein lies the problem with the private insurance model
Posted by Jill | 4:42 AM
The New York Times reports that the goals of coverage and affordability in health insurance may be mutually exclusive (in other news, sun expected to rise in east today):
As Democrats prepare to take up health care legislation on the floor of the Senate and the House, they are facing tough choices about two competing priorities. They want people to pay affordable prices for health insurance policies, but they want those policies to offer comprehensive health benefits.

These goals collide in the bills moving through Congress. The different versions of the legislation would all require insurance companies to provide coverage more generous than many policies sold in the individual market today. That is good for consumers, Democrats say.

But Republicans say the new requirements would mean added costs for some consumers and for the government, which would help pay premiums for millions of low- and middle-income people.

That tension between keeping costs low and improving coverage is just one of many challenges facing Congress and the Obama administration as they head toward the final stages of the effort to pass health care legislation.

Under the legislation, the government would not only require insurers to accept all applicants. It would also define the acceptable levels of coverage.

Senator Jeff Bingaman, Democrat of New Mexico, said the federal government had to specify coverage levels because the benefits under many existing insurance policies were inadequate.

“We have more than 46 million people who are uninsured,” Mr. Bingaman said. “We also have a substantial number who are underinsured. Although they have coverage, it is so bad or so inadequate that if they really get sick, they find they cannot afford the health care they need.”

But the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, Jon Kyl of Arizona, said it was “an act of hubris” for Congress to prescribe the permissible coverage.

“For the life of me,” Mr. Kyl said, “I don’t see why Washington has to dictate what kind of insurance you get to buy. Why not let the consumer decide?”

Perhaps because more often than not, the policies the consumer buys are worth about as much for providing health care as the products sold by Ryan O'Neal's door-to-door bible salesman in Paper Moon, as Dawn Smith found out:



Is everyone who is denied payment of claims going to be able to get his or her story in front of people the way Dawn Smith has? Of course not. And that's what the insurance companies are relying on -- the millions of people who fight with these companies every day in order to get medical care that is supposed to be covered under their plans paid.

This is why when I hear talk of "coverage" in the context of health care reform I cringe. Because "coverage" is what's on paper. But absolutely nothing is being said on Capitol Hill about actually paying claims. And that's why I'm desperately afraid that what comes out of Congress is going to be far worse than what we have now. At least now those who cannot afford "market-based" insurance aren't paying up to $15,000/year for family coverage that covers very little. What Congress is talking about is forcing them to buy "coverage" -- and doing nothing to address the hoops that these companies make people jump through in order to actually get their care paid.

The answer, of course, is not to do nothing, or to stand on a street corner holding a picture of Barack Obama with a Hitler mustache. The answer is not "government-run health care." The answer is a single-payer plan in which everyone receives REAL coverage for health care, not promises from for-profit companies which they have no intention to fulfill.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share
Monday, October 05, 2009

Al Franken: A better senator than we could have imagined in our most liberal dreams
Posted by Jill | 7:11 PM
From Blue Girl:
Senator Al Franken is proving his mettle as a United States Senator and leaving no doubt that he is absolutely cut out for the job and is doing it for the right reasons and the right people - the American people, not corporations.

To that end, he has offered an amendment to the annual Defense Appropriations bill that would prohibit the DoD from using contractors and subcontractors that requite their employees to resolve Title VII and sexual assault tort claims via forced arbitration.

Senator Franken's amendment is limited in scope, covering only Title VII and sexual assault cases, but if it passes the amendment will cover a major portion of employment cases that are brought by workers and would be an extremely important precedent for blocking forced arbitration of claims filed by employees.

The Amendment is set to come to the floor for a vote tomorrow afternoon. Call the Senate Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and ask to be connected to your Senator's office and tell your Senators that you want to support Senator Franken's amendment.

Mandatory arbitration of employee-brought cases is pure evil, denying access to the courts to people who need it most. I find it especially galling when a woman who has volunteered to go work in a war zone as a medic or a firefighter or in any other capacity is sexually assaulted by a coworker in a war zone should not be doubly victimized by a system that denies her access to the courts, the only method of redress she has.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Rachel Maddow keeps 'em honest
Posted by Jill | 6:13 AM
When Rachel Maddow is on the Press the Meat panel, it becomes something other than a cocktail-weenie circle jerk:



It's interesting to note the conservatives on this panel and elsewhere insisting that the extreme right is not driving the party, as if wishing would make it so.

My one beef with Maddow is that she seems to go along with the idea that Alan Grayson in five minutes on the House floor, while he was recognized according to House rules to speak, is somehow equal to a relentless drumbeat of "Democrats want to kill grandma." But kudos to her for noting that Sarah Palin's book is associated with white supremacists and that it says something very telling about Sarah Palin that this is who she chose.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Bu..bu...but they told him he was SPECIAL and CHOSEN!
Posted by Jill | 6:01 AM
Mark Sanford simply won't go away:


Gov. Mark Sanford said he was a broken man after admitting an extramarital affair in June, a revelation that required him to pick up the pieces of his administration and fend off efforts to remove him from office.

In the 100 days since he returned from his secret trip to Argentina to acknowledge his affair, Sanford's schedule shows - and observers agree - the Republican governor has turned his focus to the state's moribund economy.

But that new focus came only after weeks of vacations and apologies and a campaign to defend Sanford from questions about his use of state planes.

[snip]

What has Sanford done over the last 100 days?

- He has been on out-of-state trips or vacations a fifth of the time.

- He has spent another 16 days traveling the state to speak to civic and community groups, generally opening his speeches with an apology.

- He has toured a handful of state manufacturing plants and small businesses and also visited with job-creation and technical school programs.

- He moved, by an executive order, a program for developmentally challenged infants and toddlers to First Steps, an early education program created by his Democratic predecessor.

Sanford's official schedule typically contains no more than three or four items a week.

The never-ending Mark Sanford saga is interesting not just because it demonstrates a man with one hell of a pathological narcissism monkey on his back, but also one whose very belief system has been shaken to its core. It's easy to understand why pathological narcissists would be attracted to the doctrine put forth by "The Family" (of which Sanford is a member), because it elevates "clean slate Christianity" to an entirely new plane, one where there is an even smaller "elite" than the huge number of worldwide Christians, one that is, according to David Coe, heir apparent to the group's founder Douglas Coe, exempt from the rules of conduct according to which the rest of us are obligated to live.

Jeff Sharlet, in an excerpt from his book:
Attempting to explain what it means to be chosen for leadership like King David was -- or Mark Sanford, according to his own estimate -- he asked a young man who'd put himself, body and soul, under the Family's authority, "Let's say I hear you raped three little girls. What would I think of you?" The man guessed that Coe would probably think that he was a monster. "No," answered Coe, "I wouldn't." Why? Because, as a member of the Family, he's among what Family leaders refer to as the "new chosen." If you're chosen, the normal rules don't apply.

The article linked above is worth reading in its entirety, because it is a portrait of a man who has yet to believe that his spiritual leaders have lied to him when they said he was part of a special elite for whom the rules don't apply. If you thought Mark Sanford had already had his complete breakdown, you haven't seen anything yet.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

Monday Morning Blues
Posted by Jill | 5:02 AM
John Lee Hooker, Hobo Blues, 1965:


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, October 04, 2009

Sunday Night Comedy:
Posted by Jill | 9:32 PM
Tonight one of the local UHF channels that sits at the bottom of the Dish Network channel guide ran a documentary about the Smothers Brothers' battles with the CBS censors during the late 1960s. For all that my everyday speech is still littered with expressions I picked up from The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour, I'd forgotten just how subversive and edgy that show was.

I wonder sometimes if Tom and Dick Smothers would have been able to get away with more if they didn't look like the clean-cut college-boy singing duos and trios and quartets that dotted the music landscape in the early 1960s. They looked like college kids and played folk songs like the Kingston Trio, and Tommy Smothers had that whole Village Idiot thing nailed down. But what Smothered - The Censorship Struggles of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour reminded me is that for all that television has changed a big deal, and for all that without shows like the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour and the all-but-forgotten Great American Dream Machine, there would be no Daily Show or Colbert Report.

Watch these excerpts of segments by the hilariously deadpan Pat Paulsen, lampooning politics in general, health care, Social Security and gun control, and weep at how little has changed:


A lot of talent contributed to the writing of the show, including this guy:


...and some guy who's the very image of Dhani Harrison stopped by once:



Seasons 2 and 3 are out on DVD. You can quick-click to them from the left sidebar.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

American Police Force

(Major tip o’ the tinfoil hat to Libby Spenser, The Impolitic.)

My personal opinion: Montanans don't post this type of misinformation on the internet, we post pictures of things we kill.” -Al Peterson, the Two Rivers Authority.

“American Police Force.” Kind of sounds like a Steve Gutenberg movie, doesn’t it? American Police Force: Mercenary Citizens on Patrol. Except this isn’t Hollywood fiction and this is less funny than even a Gutenberg comedy.

Justin Elliot at TPMMuckraker reported,
A shadowy private security company that has no known clients but claims to have helped foreign governments combat terrorism and will protect anything from cruise ships to Pakistani convoys has taken over a jail in a small Montana town, with plans to build a law enforcement training facility on the property.

The state legislature is looking into the matter and residents of Hardin, MT, were alarmed last week when executives from the firm, American Police Force, showed up in the town, which does not have its own police department, with Mercedes SUVs bearing "City Of Hardin Police Department" decals.

Since we know that impersonating a police officer is a felony offence, one has to wonder why these imposters weren’t arrested and charged. Perhaps the answer to that is because the “city” of 3384 residents doesn’t have a police force. Add to the absurdity of American Police Force’s name is the fact that America doesn’t have a national police force, either (not even the FBI identifies itself as such).

By the way, the deserted jail would've accommodated 464 inmates from other states and, ostensibly, Guantanamo Bay detainees. 464 inmates in a “city” of 3384 is equal to 13.71% of Hardin’s population.



The creepily-named CEC/Civigenics, the Halliburton of private prisons (a sleazy outfit that seems to have sprung right out of the Jane Hamsher-produced movie Natural Born Killers), that had built the Two Rivers Correctional Facility has been embroiled in one scandal after another going back to at least last year. Among their legal troubles was a CLEAT investigation looking into possible criminal improprieties between CEC/Civigenics and county officials. Indeed, McLennan County officials had done a remarkable turnaround in August last year just four weeks after rejecting CEC/Civigenics’ bid to build an 871 bed prison by authorizing the facility. The Texarkana, Texas-based company is notorious for understaffing its prisons and for hiring kids as young as 18 as correctional officers (one such employee was busted for carrying contraband into a CEC-run prison for inmate use while another guard, this one a 20 year-old woman, was charged with bringing illegal drugs into another CEC prison).

But CEC/Civigenics is out of the picture, now. This isn’t about them. This is about American Police Force, a suspiciously well-financed Xe-like outfit that drives around in Mercedes SUVs and, according to its own website, does business with the federal government and in all 50 states, even though those claims have been called into question. Indeed, the company was founded just last March.

Al Peterson of the TRA defended APF and took to task residents who were circulating rumors of forced incarcerations, traffic stops and the confiscation of their firearms. But it seems the most outlandish claims put on the internet is by APF. Their sudden appearance in Hardin in three Mercedes SUVs masquerading as a nonexistent police force had prompted Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock to investigate APF for possible violations of the state's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act. By the way, their website, until recently, played Ravel’s Bolero.


Now, if you think that a well-funded mercenary outfit taking over a small town’s $27,000,000 empty county jail with a ten year agreement and a local reporter suddenly quitting her job to become the company’s spokesperson is strange, you haven’t heard anything, yet. After a little skullduggery on the part of press outlets such as the AP, it appears as if the head of APF, one “Michael Hilton”, started out in life as a small-time grifter straight out of Paper Moon. Hilton, a native of Montenegro and, despite having put more appearances in courtrooms than Perry Mason, is suddenly running a well-financed outfit that won’t reveal the source of their contracts. This jailbird’s aliases include Miodrag Dokovich, Miodrag Djokich, Miodrag Djokovich and Hristian Djokich, all Serbian names that’s very much in keeping with the company’s Serbian-inspired logo of the crowned double-headed eagle on Serbia-Montenegro’s coat of arms.

It’s also never been established that “Hilton” actually has any military history.

Now, while reading the first paragraph of Justin Elliot’s TPM article, the first thing that came to mind was, “Now, this wouldn't be Blackwater, would it?” No, this is American Police Force, which apparently is a Blackwater wannabe, However, while it’s never been conclusively proven that Blackwater/Xe is actually the company barging its way into Montana, one fact stands out:

Their website boasts of “our extensive tactical firearms training facility, the U.S. Training Center” as if they own it. But the U.S. Training Center is owned and operated by Blackwater. And Blackwater’s already had to fend off allegations of their connection with APR.

Yet the question remains: How can a petty crook and swindler who’s spent time in jail and had received multiple convictions of passing bad checks suddenly re-emerge as head of a multi-million dollar company that landed a shady $27 million deal taking over an empty county jail, a company that can afford to parade around in Mercedes SUVs, especially since it’s obvious that even the industrious Mr. Hilton/Dokovich/Djokich/Djokovich couldn’t possibly land contracts with the federal and foreign governments and all 50 states in less than 6 months?

I, for one, wouldn't be a bit surprised to find out that APF is a front company and/or a wholly-owned subsidiary of the embattled Blackwater/Xe.
Bookmark and Share

Corporate America in Two Minutes Fifteen Seconds
Posted by Jill | 7:00 PM
I really need to start watching Sesame Street...I'd forgotten how snarky they can be.




(via Oliver Willis)

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

And as we tell the 2009 Mets "Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya"...
Posted by Jill | 7:52 AM
...along comes Rachel Maddow with a baseball story to let us long-suffering Mets fans, many of us going through a crisis of confidence as to whether we should at long last join the Dark Side of the Force which inhabits the Bronx, something basebally to smile about:




(h/t)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Saturday, October 03, 2009

Movie Review- Capitalism: A Love Story
Michael Moore's new film, Capitalism: A Love Story comes almost on the heels of 2007's SiCKO. While SiCKO proved to be a very efficacious film that exposed the evils of the health care industry, in telling stories and showing surveillance footage of patients getting dumped off at free clinics courtesy of cab rides kindly paid by hospitals such as Kaiser Permanente, Capitalism may not prove to be as catalytic as Fahrenheit 9/11 or even Bowling For Columbine.

Moore's latest effort, while it features flashes of the beloved liberal activist we've come to know and love, plainly wasn't going for as many laughs as usual yet it suffers from a lack of focus and inspiration that made him the most successful and wealthiest documentarian in Hollywood history.

Capitalism starts off with home video footage of a North Carolina family getting evicted from their home, to be followed up by an Illinois family suffering the same fate. Moore traces our ongoing, if soured, love affair with the capitalism that's been hyped up by corporate titans as something in which we can all share.

Citing his personal experience with America the way it was during the post war boom of the Eisenhower years, Moore reminds us how life in America used to be: The husband and father going to work while Mom stayed home. If she wanted to work, she could but not because she had to. Dad worked his way toward a pension and could look forward to his golden years without anxiety.

Then about thirty years ago, something happened: That something was Ronald Reagan, a union-busting, New School Republican who proved to be the antithesis of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the last Republican president we ever had who not only had good, populist ideas but one who actually took his nation's prosperity to heart.

While Nixon, Kaiser and Ehrlichman were fingered in SiCKO as being the culprits in the disastrous privatization of the health care industry, Reagan came in with Regan and his axe man David Stockman and finished what Nixon only started. In short order, Reagan smashed PATCO and other unions, cut the income tax rate in half for the very wealthiest and started a deregulatory orgy that transformed America from a three-tiered economy to a two-tiered economy: The wealthy and the poor.

No doubt, Capitalism will stir some anger and resentment, especially when Moore goes into the specifics of the bailout bill. But Moore for once merely rehashes over what well-informed liberals already know, such as all the Goldman Sachs alumni who'd eventually come to infest the Treasury Dept. Even worse, Moore continues to insist that the bailout bill was the "mere" $700 billion that the MSM dutifully and robotically tells us it was. The total bailout, when one factors in the trillions more poured into foreign and domestic banks by the Federal Reserve, which alone could easily support a two hour Moore documentary, brings the total taxpayer tab to several trillions more.

He takes a few swipes at George W. Bush, former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. He even briefly mentions the FOA sweetheart deals given to senior senators such as Christopher Dodd courtesy of Angelo Mozillo. Then the movie ends, with all the implicated players seemingly let off the hook.

Capitalism, as stated before, isn't played for laughs, although there are a few moments of dark humor aided by Moore's trademark usage of public domain file footage. At one point, Moore is even stopped about 70 feet from the lobby of a bailed-out bank by an overzealous security officer who kept putting his hand over the camera lens.

Moore, to his credit, doesn't end his documentary on a hopeless note. He returns to the Republic Door Factory in Chicago that was taken over by recently laid off workers who were rooked out of their severance pay by Bank of America when they yanked Republic's line of credit. He showed us the Cook County sheriff who refused to evict people from their homes in that same city and even showed us the successful efforts of a family squatting in their own foreclosed home.

But the well-informed already know this. Moore's appeal and popularity had always depended on being one step ahead of us and ingeniously synthesizing hard investigative journalism, a keen eye for history with entertainment no matter how grim the news or dire the results. There's little of that in Capitalism and those who see it may derive the sense that it will prove to be far less efficacious than his earlier, more successful efforts.

And let's not forget, Michael Moore has a miserable track record in terms of efficacy. GM still filed for bankruptcy and people lost their jobs, gun sales are still going through the roof, George W. Bush was able to steal another election and we're no closer to getting actual health care reform today than we've been over the last 45 years.

The toll on Moore is showing. At the end of the movie he wearily says, "I can't do this anymore," and called for his fans to get more involved, a theme that we've been hearing from Moore for weeks. This could easily be Michael Moore's last documentary. If that's true, it's a shame that he couldn't go out with a bigger bang.
Bookmark and Share

I hope Alan Grayson isn't limited to just 15 minutes of fame
Posted by Jill | 12:51 PM
This is a dream Democrat out of central casting:
Already Grayson is one of the most targeted incumbents in the country, having defeated four-term Republican Ric Keller, and his re-election bid embodies the challenge Democrats face in holding control of Congress as the president's approval rating falls.

But a leading opponent has not yet emerged and Grayson, the 12th-wealthiest member of Congress, has resources to defend himself. He spent $2 million of his own money on the 2008 campaign. (The "die quickly" speech has triggered $150,000 in contributions, his office says.) And his district has shifted from slightly Republican to slightly Democratic.

"It's no coincidence the National Republican Congressional Committee has named me as the No. 1 target next year," Grayson said. "We're working hard, getting things done."

Swagger courses through Grayson's every word, delivered in the accent of his Bronx upbringing and with the exacting nature of a lawyer who first made his name taking on — and taking down — contractors and war profiteers in Iraq.

"I don't need the job for income or satisfaction," said Grayson, sitting on a bench outside the House chamber in between votes. "The truth is, it's really a hardship. I took an enormous pay cut to take the job. Every week, I leave five young children and my wife to come up here.

"I don't owe anything to anyone here. I don't owe anything to lobbyists. I don't owe anything to leadership. The only thing I owe to anybody is the well-being of 800,000 people who depend on me."

[snip]

Grayson's life story has the makings of a Horatio Alger novel. He grew up in a cramped Bronx tenement, the asthma-inflicted son of public school educators. Sickness and death are common themes.

As a boy, a bully threw him under a moving bus but he pulled himself free just in time. In Sri Lanka in 1984, he sat under a 2,200-year-old tree, a sacred Buddhist site, where guerrillas later slaughtered 200 people. He used to wake up in the middle of the night covered in his own blood, for no apparent reason. He was nearly killed in a car accident.

You wonder if he's putting you on, but he does not flinch. "I seem to have nine lives," Grayson said. "I've given a lot of thought to what I wanted to do in life."

Grayson got into Harvard and to cover expenses worked as a night watchman and cleaned toilets. He finished in three years, "and pretty close to the top of my class." He went on to work as an economist but returned to Harvard for a law degree and master's in public policy. Took him four years. "And I was working at the time." Then, he said, he went on to work for some of the titans of the legal field — Ginsberg, Bork, Scalia.

In 1990, Grayson and a college friend rented space over a funeral home in the Bronx and founded IDT Corp., a telecommunications company. Grayson did not stay long but made a fortune and said he invested smartly in airlines and Kentucky Fried Chicken. Today he has a net worth of $31 million, according to financial disclosure forms, though he lost $34 million in a Ponzi investment scheme this year.

Grayson met his first wife at a Halloween party in Boulder in the early 1980s. He dressed as a Catholic priest (he's Jewish). He remarried in 1990 and he and his wife, Lolita, have five children under age 15, all with names beginning with 'S:' Skye, Star, Sage and twins Storm and Stone. They live not far from Disney World.

Working full time as a lawyer until joining Congress, Grayson made a name filing whistle­blower lawsuits on contractor fraud and war profiteering in Iraq. The cases, involving big names like Halliburton and Custer Battles, were met with resistance from the Bush administration. Grayson said he was subjected to gag orders and stalling tactics.

[snip]

Routine questions elicit deeply philosophical responses. Asked where he got his political leanings, Grayson's answer ran eight minutes.

"There are now over 6 billion of us," he said. "When I buy something, I'm buying the fruits of someone else's labor. When I watch TV, I'm seeing things that other people have created. We are all highly specialized and highly independent and the only way to make everyone better off is if everyone is better off. My political philosophy is to see that that happens."


And that, aside from his outspokenness and startling physical resemblance to Luca Brasi in The Godfather:

(and yes, I'm aware of what happened to Luca Brasi and hopefully Grayson's smarts will prevent him from sleeping with the fishes)

...is why the Republicans have their knickers in a twist about Alan Grayson. Here's a guy who doesn't need to rely on the health insurance industry for campaign money, who's a tough Bronx boy, who's beholden to no one except his own innate sense of decency, and who hasn't forgotten from whence he came.

Republicans save their worst venom for self-made men like Alan Grayson. In their worldview, you're supposed to pull up the ladder behind you if you make it out from a modest beginning. Someone who doesn't adopt the "I got mine and fuck you" doctrine is a profound threat to their well-established order. We can only hope that Grayson doesn't have any John Edwards-ish skeletons in his closet, because so far at least, it sounds like he's the fire-breathing progressive populist we need right now.

(The Rude Pundit has more.)

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

Chris Rock cuts through the bullshit on Polanski
Posted by Jill | 8:45 AM
When you look at the names on the petition suggesting that 30 years in European "exile" is sufficient punishment for a guy who raped a thirteen-year-old, it's almost enough to make you sign on with the wingnuts decrying Hollywood liberals for their advocacy of immorality. I'm quite lefty, I reviewed movies for eight years, and I even gave a glowing review to The Pianist. But even I can wrap my mind around the idea that however masterful a director Roman Polanski may be, and however horrific it was that his wife was murdered by Susan Atkins, that doesn't excuse raping a thirteen-year-old.

We're living in a time in which we're being told that the lies and death perpetrated by the previous administration are something we should just look past and get over and move on. By this logic, a bank robber (or child rapist, for that matter) can say five seconds after the crime, "Oh, well, that's in the past. Let's move on and forget about it." And to see respected arthouse and mainstream A-listers like Pedro Almodovar, Wes Anderson, Natalie Portman, Kristin Scott Thomas, Darren Aronofsky, Julian Schnabel. Martin Scorsese (!!!), Tilda Swinton,Penelope Cruz, Harrison Ford, Jeremy Irons, Stephen Soderbergh, John Landis, and Wong Kar-Wai unable to wrap their heads around the idea of separating the work from the man is pretty damn disheartening. I'm told the Roman emperor Nero was a pretty fair violinist, too. So what?

As that OTHER Jill points out at Feministe, this isn't about Hollywood Liberals vs. Real Christian Americans™. It's about right and wrong, and you don't have to believe in a great white alpha male in the sky to recognize that drugging a kid barely into puberty and then raping every orifice of her body is not the act of a misunderstood Holocaust survivor, but a sick, sick crime. To excuse this crime by invoking the Holocaust is an insult to every other survivor of the Nazi camps.

Perhaps, as Jill says, you'll never work in this town again if you speak out against Polanski and that's why it's up to those whose job it seems to be to poke Hollywood and other examples of American hypocrisy with a stick to speak out...people like Chris Rock:


Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Friday, October 02, 2009

Scared Tom

“You will defund ACORN, ya hear, boy?!” “Yassa, Massa Legree!”

That’s one of many possible anagrams for the word “Democrats.” They’re scared of a minority that’s on its figurative knees and have become the Uncle Toms of Congress. And the persecution of ACORN is the epitome of Democratic cowardice.

Let’s put their capitulation into perspective: Imagine latter-day African Americans bowing, scraping and running for cover in the middle of Watts or Harlem at the sight of a few Klansman, and ones not in mufti, walking down the street. Or imagine today’s empowered, independent and competitive women, using, for instance, female role models such as Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, suddenly acknowledging that a Republican crustacean such as John Derbyshire is right, after all, and set about cleaning his house? Imagine if these two large and empowered demographics unaccountably and for no reason whatsoever gave up all the civil rights won for them by their forebears.

This is pretty much what Democrats have done with our empowerment of them. Congress has become Uncle Tom’s Rotunda, the House That Ruthlessness Built. And, despite his obvious intelligence and eloquence, President Barack Obama, sad to say, is the biggest Uncle Tom of all, the tuxedo-wearing butler who enjoys a little more status than the rest but, from time to time, is still reminded of his place.

Otherwise why would Obama, who was once deeply affiliated with ACORN, say on national television that ACORN “deserves to be investigated”? If it was merely another instance of Obama throwing a former ally under the wheels of the bus in order to tamp down the unquenchable racist fires of the Far Right, it would be lamentable enough. Yet once Democrats realized that Obama would not stand up to defend ACORN from allegations from those who also don’t believe he’s an American and that there are still death panels, they broke their necks to join Republicans in defunding ACORN, with only seven Democrats in the Senate (including Durbin and Burris of Illinois) backing the community activist organization.

Where was this Democratic outrage over electoral fraud in the wake of the 2000 elections? On, appropriately, April Fool’s Day last year, Art Levine of The American Prospect wrote an article entitled, The Republican War on Voting in which he simply but ingeniously compared the largely law-abiding, sternly self-auditing ACORN with the various Republican mechanisms that were found guilty of throwing out Democratic registration forms, ballot-dumping and engaging in vote-caging to keep non-Republicans from the polls.

Somehow, despite us living in an electronic age in which good information and knowledge is at our fingertips, we the people persist in believing that voter fraud is a much more serious and endemic problem than Republican electoral fraud.

States, including Florida, had been plausibly accused, as have other red states, of throwing out Democratic voter registration forms and ballots yet no one in Congress proposed touching their federal funding. Do a Google search using the key words, “2000, registrations, thrown out, Republican” and you will get 2,090,000 hits. It’s not as if it hasn’t been established in the mainstream media that the biggest advantage to Republicans for the last three decades has been to suppress the vote and those who seek to get out the vote among the poor and disenfranchised who only get to wield their tiny power once every 730 days.

How soon we’ve forgotten the prescient words of Reagan goon Paul Weyrich when he said back in 1980, “I don't want everybody to vote. . . . As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.” So who’s next in the crosshairs? ACORN’s erstswhile partner, Project Vote? And will Democrats, in true Uncle Tom fashion, be the spotter for Republican snipers?

We’ve seen Democratic capitulation more times than unearthed Republican scandals in the relatively brief time since the Democrats took control of Congress and, later, the White House. Time and again, we’ve seen, through the jihad against Moveon.org and their “General Betray us” ad down to the Salem witch hunt of ACORN, a majority party that’s too cowed by the spindly-legged Simon Legree as he cross hatches their backs with a whip to realize that they’re the ones who are large and in charge, scared Toms too stupid and crazed with fear to realize that they will always get such treatment from the vastly outnumbered master no matter how hard they try to be good and remember their place.
Bookmark and Share

"America is sick of you, Republican Party. You are a LIE FACTORY - that's all you ever do."
Posted by Jill | 7:43 AM
Alan Grayson isn't giving any ground, nor should he:



I don't like Ed Schultz, but Grayson is awesome. He looks like an extra from The Sopranos, but he's smart as a whip, and he will not sit down and he will not shut up or be cowed by the likes of Michael Steele and Eric Cantor and the rest of the Republican fainting couchers. The Republicans ARE a lie factory, and their hypocrisy is positively jaw dropping. This is a party that has embraced the "birthers" and other crazies; a party whose own representatives have perpetuated the myth set forth by their Designated Idiot, Sarh Palin, that the government is going to exterminate old people...and now they're got their panties in a twist because a Democratic Congressman FINALLY has the balls to call them on their bullshit?

This should be a lesson to ALL Washington Democrats: When you actually challenge these bullies, they crumple like a Yugo.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share
Thursday, October 01, 2009

A Slobbering Love Affair Gone Sour

(A Brilliant at Breakfast exclusive.)

A few days ago, the notorious Bernie Goldberg, author of a certain book that labeled in McCarthyite fashion America's top 100 public enemies, went off the rails on The O'Reilly Factor. The author of Regnery's A Slobbering Love Affair, subtitled "The True (And Pathetic) Story of the Torrid Romance Between Barack Obama and the Mainstream Media", started out docilely enough, rolling over and getting his pasty belly rubbed when Bill O began whining about how the Big, Bad lib'ral MSM is beating up on Fox.

Eventually, Goldberg slipped his leash and began joining in in the chewing. While not having the guts to name names (although we all know the usual suspects), Goldberg then took some Fox talking heads to task for presenting themselves as journalists when they're plainly not and for stating as facts things that are not factual.

It wasn't much but considering the ironclad discipline for which Fox and the GOP are infamous, this chink in the armor is significant. Sure, Bernie could've gone all out and completely laid out Fox like Alan Grayson on a 'roid rage but the very fact that he called them out for their lies is huge.

Bill O obviously was getting uncomfortable with the dissidence from one of his own shock troops and he lamely tried to compare the racist tea parties with Earth Day. Of course, you won't see Keith Olbermann beating the drums and mobilizing the masses, with one of his producers goosing the crowd and standing passively by while Earth Day hippies advocate killing the president.

Beyond that, same thing, really.

But with Goldberg's temporary defection and Alan Grayson's warpath, we're seeing signs that people on both sides of the ideological Great Divide are getting heartily sick and tired of the spin, lies and outright racism that's propagated on shows like the O'Reilly Factor.
Bookmark and Share

Now we know who the Scott Garrett voters are
Posted by Jill | 10:15 AM
The South makes an easy target for progressives these days, what with Mark Sanford's escapades, and the lunatic asylum that is the state of Florida. But while I was in Berlin, there was a "pot, kettle" moment that I missed, when Public Policy Polling released the results of a survey which showed that almost one in five New Jersey conservatives is at least inclined to believe that Barack Obama is the Antichrist.

Here in Middle Whitelandia, where voters are getting ready to express their disgust with the council's long refusal to deal with our corrupt, alcoholic ex-mayor by electing a member from that very same council to be the new mayor, I know there are pockets of Christofascist Zombieism, given the preponderance of "John 3:16" signs that show up on lawns now more often than contractor signs. But while we like to pride ourselves here in the Land of Blueberries And Tank Farms on being at least marginally less crazy than our southern brethren, in those pockets lies some first-class lunacy:

Do you think Barack Obama is the Anti-Christ?
If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If you’re not
sure, press 3.
Yes ................................................................. 8%
No................................................................... 79%
Not Sure.......................................................... 13%

Do you think Barack Obama was born in the
United States? If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If
you’re not sure, press 3.
Yes ................................................................. 64%
No................................................................... 21%
Not Sure.......................................................... 16%

Do you think the federal government should be
eliminated? If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If
you’re not sure, press 3.
Yes ................................................................. 6%
No................................................................... 83%
Not Sure.......................................................... 11%

Do you think that public education should be
eliminated? If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If
you’re not sure, press 3.
Yes ................................................................. 5%
No................................................................... 90%
Not Sure.......................................................... 5%

The Obama birthplace question doesn't tabulate for those who do not know that Hawaii is a state, but I'm not sure that would make a whole lot of difference. But however small the lunatic numbers seem to be, the idea that one in ten New Jerseyans either favors or is open to the idea that public education should be eliminated, that one in six either favors or is open to the idea of eliminating the federal government entirely, and that about one in five thinks Obama is the Antichrist shows that Teh Crazy is not limited to the parts of the country south of the Mason-Dixon line.

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

Lost in the hoopla over the public option...
Posted by Jill | 6:49 AM
While the news media were covering the defeat of two public option proposals in the Senate and whether Alan Grayson is a big old meanie who should apologize to the wee sensitive frail souls in the Republican Party, the Senate Finance Committee -- yes, the one chaired by Max "Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Of The Insurance Industry" Baucus, voted to restore funding for abstinence-only education.

Yes, folks, while Republicans scream about pork and about wise expenditures of federal tax money, they're voting to teach kids "Just Don't Do It." Republicrats Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas) and Kent Conrad (North Dakota) voted with the pearl-clutchers on the right -- you know, the ones who embrace the moral family values of David Vitter and John Ensign while telling teenagers not to fuck.

There's no excuse for continuing these programs, which have shown to be ineffective in preventing teen sexual activity, other than the Republican obsession with teen sex -- perhaps because their own sexual maturity level is about at the level of your average 15-year-old boy:
A long-awaited national study has concluded that abstinence-only sex education, a cornerstone of the Bush administration's social agenda, does not keep teenagers from having sex. Neither does it increase or decrease the likelihood that if they do have sex, they will use a condom.

Authorized by Congress in 1997, the study followed 2000 children from elementary or middle school into high school. The children lived in four communities -- two urban, two rural. All of the children received the family life services available in their community, in addition, slightly more than half of them also received abstinence-only education.

By the end of the study, when the average child was just shy of 17, half of both groups had remained abstinent. The sexually active teenagers had sex the first time at about age 15. Less than a quarter of them, in both groups, reported using a condom every time they had sex. More than a third of both groups had two or more partners.

"There's not a lot of good news here for people who pin their hopes on abstinence-only education," said Sarah Brown, executive director of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, a privately funded organization that monitors sex education programs. "This is the first study with a solid, experimental design, the first with adequate numbers and long-term follow-up, the first to measure behavior and not just intent. On every measure, the effectiveness of the programs was flat."

They sure spend a lot of time obsessing about teen sex, these Republicans. Perhaps that's why they can't be bothered working to come up with some kind of viable health care reform -- they're too busy getting in touch with their own inner Roman Polanski.

Labels:

Bookmark and Share

Thursday Big Blue Smurf Blogging: What Alan Grayson said
Posted by Jill | 5:45 AM
OK, it's at the Great Orange Satan, but there's no getting around the fact that GOS is the go-to place for Washingtonians looking to reach the greatest number of progressives in one place. But it's definitely worth a read.

Money quote:
Unlike Joe Wilson, I didn't break a rule of the House. And unlike Joe Wilson, I actually told the truth.  Every single year, over forty-four thousand people in America die because they don't have health insurance.  Read this Harvard study.  That is the plain truth.


And now the Republicans claim they are going to introduce a resolution "disapproving" of my behavior.


What is this, junior high school?  Do they think my feelings are hurt?  Just what do these people think health care means?  It's not some abstract "issue", we're talking about life and death!  And the Republicans, who ran the government in full or in part from 2001-2009, chose to let those 44,000 people die, every single year when they were in power.  And George W. Bush, whom the Republicans somehow pretend was not President for the last eight years, just let them die.  He even vetoed health care for poor children.


So apologize?  I don't think so.



Here's Alan Grayson on Rachel Maddow's show last night, and Rachel's documentation of how the Republican outrage is less about decorum than it is about bullies crying "no fair!" when the opposition fights back:



And if you needed any further proof that the news media are 100% in the tank with Republican bullies, here you go -- Grayson takes on the pearl-clutchers at CNN yesterday:



Grayson needs to know that we've got his back, and his fellow Democrats need to know that this is what we want from our representatives in Washington. You can tell him right here:







My contribution: $





Labels:

Bookmark and Share